Background
Breast cancer is the most common malignancies worldwide. Despite recent advances in diagnosis and treatment, it remains the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths among women [
1,
2]. Chemotherapy is one of the well-established strategies of breast cancer treatment. However, drug resistance is a major cause of cancer treatment failure and cancer-related death. Therefore, it is of great clinical significance to investigate the mechanisms underlying drug resistance.
14, 15-epoxyeicosatrienoic acid (14, 15-EET) is a lipid signaling molecule which regulates various physiological processes such as proliferation, migration and inflammation [
3,
4]. Recently, it has been reported that 14, 15-EET promoted tumor cell proliferation and metastasis [
5‐
7]. Epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) is the process that epithelial cells lose polarity and cell-cell adhesion, and acquire the characteristics of mesenchymal cells [
8,
9]. Cells undergoing EMT display reduced expression of epithelial cell markers (such as E-cadherin, ZO-1) and increased expression of mesenchymal molecules (such as N-cadherin, vimentin, snail, slug). EMT plays a critical role in tumor cell migration, metastasis and the acquisition of stem cell-like properties [
10‐
13]. Although the role of 14, 15-EET in tumor invasion and metastasis has been demonstrated in recent years, the mechanism underlying the role of 14, 15-EET in tumor cell EMT remains unclear.
Recently, EMT has received more and more attention for its role in cancer drug resistance. Several studies showed that the drug resistant cancer cells display features of EMT [
14,
15]. It has been found that inhibition of breast cancer cell EMT could suppress cancer drug resistance [
16]. These results suggested that EMT might be associated with cancer cell drug resistance. Given that 14, 15-EET promoted tumor invasion and metastasis by inducing tumor cell EMT, the role and mechanisms of 14, 15-EET in cancer cell drug resistance still remains largely unknown.
In the present study, we found that 14,15-EET induces breast cancer cell EMT, and demonstrated that 14, 15-EET up-regulates integrin αvβ3 expression, which leads to the activation of FAK/PI3K/AKT signaling. Furthermore, we revealed that integrin αvβ3 and FAK/PI3K/AKT activation is required for 14, 15-EET to induce tumor cell EMT and cisplatin resistance.
Methods
Patients
The study protocol was performed according to the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Ethics Committee of Wuhan No.1 Hospital of Tongji Medical College. All breast cancer patients gave their signed informed consent for the use of biological samples. Tumor tissues and noncancerous tissues were collected from 11 patients in the Wuhan No.1 Hospital of Tongji Medical College.
Cell line and animals
Human breast cancer cell MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 were purchased from the China Center for Type Culture Collection (Wuhan, China). BALB/c athymic nude (nu/nu) mice (6–8 weeks old) were obtained from SLAC Laboratory Animal Co. Ltd. (Shanghai, China). The mice were maintained in the accredited animal facility of Tongji Medical College, and used for studies approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of Tongji Medical College.
Antibodies and reagents
Rabbit anti-human antibodies against integrin αv and β3, FAK, p-FAK, PI3K, p-PI3K, AKT, p-AKT, E-cadherin, N-cadherin, vimentin, snail and LY294002 (PI3K inhibitor) were purchased from Cell Signaling (Danvers, MA, USA). slug and PF562271 were purchased from Abcam (Cambridge, MA, US). The small interfering RNAs (si RNAs) against integrin αv, integrin β3 and control for experiments using targeted siRNA transfection were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA). Lipofectamine 2000 was purchased from Invitrogen Life Technologies (Carlsbad, CA, USA). The 14, 15-EET and 14, 15-EEZE were purchased from Cayman chemical (Ann 152 Arbor, MI, USA).
Cell culture
MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 cells were cultured in flasks in DMEM growth medium supplemented with 5% FBS, 100 U/ml of penicillin, and 100 pg/ml of streptomycin. The cells were cultured at 37 °C in a humidified atmosphere of 95% air and 5% CO2.
Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)
A stable metabolite of 14, 15-EET, 14, 15-dihydroxyeicosatrienoic acid (14, 15-DHET) in peripheral venous blood from patients with breast cancer and healthy donors or in BC tissues and noncancerous tissues from breast cancer patients was measured with ELISA (14, 15-EET/DHET ELISA kit; Detroit R&D Inc., Detroit, MI, USA) according to the manual.
Measurement of cell proliferation
Cell viability was performed using an MTT assay. Cells were added to 96-well plates (5 × 103 cells per well) following to 24 h incubation. On the following day the media were removed and the cells were treated with or without 14, 15-EET and/or 14, 15-EEZE following an incubation for 72 h. After incubation of respective time 10% of an MTT solution (2 mg/mL) was added to each well and the cells were incubated for 4 h at 37 °C. The formazan crystals that formed were dissolved in DMSO (100 μ L/well) with constant shaking for 5 min. The absorbance of the plate was then read with a microplate reader at 540 nm. Three replicate wells were evaluated for each analysis.
Adhesion assay
Tumor cells were added to 6-well plates (5 × 105 cells per well) which were pre-coated with fibronectin (Sigma). After 2 h incubation at 37 °C, non-adherent cells were harvested. Then, adherent cells were harvested by treatment with trypsin. The percentage of adherent cells was calculated. The results were expressed as A570 values. Each assay was tested in triplicate wells in three independent experiments.
Matrigel invasion assay
Cells (5 × 104) in serum-free media were seeded onto the upper chambers of modified Boyden chambers (Corning, NY, USA) in which the Transwell filter inserts were coated with Matrigel. In the lower chambers, 5% FBS was added as a chemoattractant. After incubation for 24 h, the membrane was washed briefly with PBS and fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde. The upper side of membrane was wiped gently with a cotton ball. The membrane was then stained using hematoxylin and removed. The magnitude of cells migration was evaluated by counting the migrated cells in six random clones under high-power (× 100) microscope fields. The average number of cells per field was calculated.
Cell transfection
For silencing specific gene expression, cells were treated with integrin αv siRNA or integrin β3 siRNA. Briefly, 5 × 105 MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 cells were seeded into 6-well plate with 2 ml antibiotic-free normal growth medium containing FBS. Transfection of integrin αv siRNA, integrin β3 siRNA or control siRNA was performed according to the manufacture’s protocol.
Quantitative RT-PCR
Total RNA was extracted from cells with TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). Quantitative real-time PCR analyses were performed by Applied Biosystems using SYBR Premix Ex Taq™ (TaKaRa, Japan). The mRNA of GAPDH was used as internal control. The primers were as follows: integrin αv, sense5’-CTCGGGACTCCTGCTACCTC-3′, antisense 5’-AAGAAACATCCGGGAAGACG-3′ integrin β3, sense 5’-CCGTGACGAGATTGAGTCA-3′ antisense5’-AGGATGGACTTTCCACTAGAA-3′ and GAPDH, sense 5’-TCATTGACCTCAACTACATGGTTT-3′, antisense 5’-GAAGATGGTGATGGGATTTC-3’.The relative expression of αv and β3 was calculated using 2-ΔΔCt method.
Western blot analysis
The whole-cell extracts were prepared using RIPA lysis buffer (Beyotime, China) with phenylmethanesulfonyl fluoride and protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche, USA). Cell lysates were separated by 8–12% SDS-PAGE and electro-transferred onto polyvinylidene difluoride membranes (Bio-Rad, USA). After being blocked using 5% non-fat milk for 1 h at room temperature, membranes were incubated with the indicated primary antibodies overnight at 4 °C and probed with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies (1:1000). The bands were visualized using a ChemicDocXRS system (Bio-Rad, USA).
Immunohistochemistry
Mice were inoculated i.m. in the right hind thigh with MDA-MB-231 cells (2 × 106). Tissue sections were prepared and subjected to immunohistochemical analysis. Anti-human Ki67 antibody, anti-human E-cadherin and anti-human vimentin antibody were used as primary antibodies. HRP-conjugated secondary Ab was used as secondary antibody. Images were obtained using an Olympus-IX71 microscope at 40 × 10 magnification.
For H&E staining, the tumor tissues were embedded in paraffin according to standard histological procedures. Sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin.
Mice xenograft models
To assay tumor cell arrest in lung during blood flow, MDA-MB-231 cells were labeled with CFSE, and injected into mice via tail vein (2 × 106 cells/mouse, n = 8 for each group). Lungs of mice were harvested 5 h or 24 h after the injection. Frozen sections were prepared and analyzed by fluorescence microscopy. Fluorescent spots were counted from 20 randomly chosen fields in sections of each mouse.
Nude mice were inoculated i.m. in the right hind thigh with MDA-MB-231 cells(2 × 106). The transplanted nude mice were randomly divided into 5 groups (n = 6 for each group). The mice were treated or untreated with14, 15-EET and/or 14, 15-EEZE (i.v. injection, 30 μg/kg/2d). The mice were treated with cisplatin (i.p. injection, 3.0 mg/kg/d) or PBS. All mice were examined every 2 days and sacrificed 35 days after tumor inoculation. Tumor volume (V) was monitored by measuring the length (L) and width (W) and calculated with the formula V = (L × W2) × 0.5.
Statistical analysis
The values given are means ± S.E.M. The significance of difference between the experimental groups and controls was assessed by Student’s t test. The difference was significant if the p value was < 0.05.
Discussion
To develop a novel and efficient therapy for human breast cancer treatment, it is necessary to elucidate the molecular mechanisms underlying tumor metastasis and drug resistance. Accumulating evidence have suggested that 14, 15-EET promotes tumor metastasis and progression in various cancers including breast cancer [
17,
18]. In the present study, we demonstrated that 14, 15-EET up-regulates integrin αvβ3 expression and results in FAK/PI3K/AKT activation. Furthermore, we found that 14, 15-EET induces breast cancer cells EMT and cisplatin resistance through integrin αvβ3 and its downstream FAK/PI3K/AKT/ signaling. Our finding provide an insight into the function of 14, 15-EET in regulating breast cancer cell EMT and cisplatin resistance.
EET has been reported to enhance tumor cell motility, invasion and metastasis [
7,
19]. Our previous study found that 14, 15-EET induced neutrophils infiltration and promoted tumor metastases [
17]. EMT is associated with tumor invasive and metastatic potential. However, the relationship between 14, 15-EET and breast cancer cell EMT has not been investigated. Our current study provide evidence that 14,15-EET induced breast cancer cells EMT, as demonstrated by the changed levels of EMT markers and cell morphology.
Recently, the molecular mechanisms of EMT have been extensively investigated, several signaling pathways that induce EMT have been discovered [
20‐
22]. Integrin αvβ3 has been shown to be frequently implicated in the metastasis of various tumor types [
23‐
25]. It has been reported that integrin αvβ3 is involved in tumor cell EMT [
26‐
28]. In the current study, we found that 14, 15-EET led to a significant increase in mRNA and protein level of integrins αv and β3. In contrast, treatment of its antagonist 14, 15-EEZE resulted in a reversal of the 14, 15-EET effects on integrin αvβ3 expression. To understand the mechanism of 14,15-EET-induced EMT, we silenced the breast cancer cells integrin αvβ3. We found knockdown of integrin αv and β3 reversed the effects of 14, 15-EET on the levels of EMT markers and cell morphology, these findings further confirm that integrin αvβ3 mediates breast cancer cells EMT induced by 14,15-EET.
Integrin signaling is depending on the formation of adhesion complexes including FAK, after activation of FAK by integrins, activated FAK phosphorylates the downstream PI3K and then activates Akt [
29]. Our previous study found that integrin αvβ3 activated FAK and promoted tumor invasion [
23]. Several studies have reported the role of FAK signaling in the induction of EMT [
30,
31]. 14, 15-EET has been reported to activate PI3K/AKT signaling [
32]. To further elucidate the molecular mechanism of 14,15-EET-induced EMT we focused on signaling pathway implicating FAK and the downstream PI3K/AKT signaling. We demonstrated that 14, 15-EET activates breast cancer cells FAK/PI3K/AKT signaling through up-regulating integrin αvβ3. Furthermore, we found that inhibiting FAK by a pharmacological inhibitor of FAK, PF-562271 reversed the EMT induced by 14,15-EET. Similar study was reported that FAK play a crucial role EMT through the activation of Akt signaling pathway [
30]. A recent study demonstrated that FAK/PI3K/AKT signaling mediates the hepatocellular carcinoma EMT [
26]. In our study, we found that PI3K/AKT signaling inhibitor, LY294002 abrogate 14,15-EET-induced breast cancer cells EMT.
It is becoming increasingly evident that EMT is frequently accompanied with cancer drug resistance in various cancer [
33‐
35]. Inhibition EMT reversed the drug resistance [
36,
37]. It has been reported that integrin β3 mediated tumor cell erlotinib resistance [
38]. In our present study, we demonstrated that 14, 15-EET enhanced breast cancer cisplatin resistance, knockdown of integrin αv and β3 abolished 14, 15-EET-induced cisplatin resistance. PI3K/AKT signaling activation may be involved in tumor cell resistance to sorafenib [
26]. It has been reported that activation of AKT signaling led to drug resistance in breast cancer and ovarian cancer [
39,
40]. Moreover, AKT was found to mediate the Twist2-induced cisplatin resistance [
41]. Here, we found that knockdown of integrin αv and β3 partially inhibits FAK/PI3K/AKT activation in 14, 15-EET-treated tumor cells. As expected, inhibition of FAK and PI3K/AKT activation by PF562271 or LY294002 substantially sensitized tumor cells to cisplatin.
As outlined above, both integrin αvβ3 and FAK/PI3K/AKT signaling have been involved in 14, 15-EET-induced breast cancer cells EMT and cisplatin resistance. Further study will be needed to refine our mechanistic model. The data on the intermediate factors connecting 14, 15-EET to integrin αvβ3 is little. In addition, knockdown of integrin αv and β3 only partially inhibited the activation of FAK/PI3K/AKT, suggesting that additional factors downstream of 14, 15-EET may also lead to 14, 15-EET-induced EMT and cisplatin resistance.