Background
Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic inflammatory skin disease that is associated with reduced quality of life (QoL), primarily due to itchy skin [
1‐
3]. The disease is characterised by reduced skin microbial diversity and overgrowth of
Staphylococcus (S.) aureus, a bacterium that can aggravate skin inflammation via the production of staphylococcal enterotoxins that stimulate the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines [
4‐
7]. However, the importance of
S. aureus colonisation in the complex pathogenesis, compared to the other genetic and immunologic factors involved, remains unclear.
Current treatment approaches for AD include topical treatment with emollients and anti-inflammatory therapy with (topical) immunosuppressive agents (corticosteroids and calcineurin inhibitors), according to the international guidelines [
8,
9]. Anti-staphylococcal therapy is only recommended in cases of fever or clinically infected skin [
8,
9]. Clinical studies that evaluated the added value of anti-staphylococcal therapy in non-infected AD, have shown contradictory results. Bath Hextall et al. performed a systematic review of 26 studies and showed that anti-staphylococcal agents reduced the amount of
S. aureus on the skin in AD. However, the bacteriological reduction did not translate into a decrease in clinical symptoms [
10]. These studies mainly investigated short-term therapies of less than one month duration and comprised small and poor-quality studies. As discontinuation of therapy after a short treatment period can result in quick regrowth of
S. aureus [
11], the results of this systematic review do not necessarily mean that anti-staphylococcal agents do not work. A more recent review by Brüssow et al. summarizes two intervention trials that reported significant reduction in disease severity in non-infected AD after 2 and 3 months of therapy with anti-staphylococcal therapy (bleach baths) [
12‐
14]. We hypothesize that long-term therapy may be needed to reduce
S. aureus overgrowth and maintain a stable and balanced skin microbial composition. Ultimately, this could result in disease improvement, prevention of AD flares and less need for (topical) immune suppression. However, long-term use of antibiotics can induce bacterial resistance [
15], and both the use of antibiotics and dilute bleach baths can cause unnecessary harm to the commensal flora, that is hypothesized to have anti-staphylococcal properties [
16].
In the context of the increasing incidence of bacterial resistance, the interest in bacteriophages and their endolysins as antibacterial therapy has been renewed [
17]. Staphefekt SA.100 is an engineered chimeric endolysin that specifically lyses the cell membrane of
S. aureus via endopeptidase and putative amidase activities [
18‐
20]. Long-term application of Staphefekt on the skin, targeting only
S. aureus and leaving skin commensals unharmed, may improve long-term AD outcomes, such as the number of disease flares, and may reduce the use of topical corticosteroids. Bacterial resistance to Staphefekt or other endolysins has not been observed and could not be induced, which enables us to study the effect of long-term anti-staphylococcal treatment in non-infected AD using this endolysin-based agent [
19,
21,
22].
The aim of this randomized controlled trial, the MAAS trial, is to evaluate the effect of 3-month anti-staphylococcal therapy with Staphefekt on the frequency and quantity of topical corticosteroid use, clinical symptoms and QoL in patients with moderate to severe AD. In addition, data on the growth characteristics of the skin microbiome, including S. aureus, will be collected, which will gain insight into the role of the microbiome as a factor in the pathophysiology of AD.
Discussion
The MAAS trial is a randomized, placebo-controlled trial that investigates the effect of 3-month anti-staphylococcal therapy with Staphefekt on topical corticosteroid use, clinical symptoms and QoL in adults with moderate to severe AD. Additionally, data will be collected about the growth characteristics of the skin microbiome, including S. aureus. Taking into consideration the current literature on anti-staphylococcal therapy, a study design using a long-term anti-staphylococcal intervention, measuring long-term outcomes was chosen.
Evidence for the clinical efficacy of Staphefekt, registered as a class 1 medical device in Europe, is based on in vitro studies and a case series [
18‐
20]. These in vitro studies showed that Staphefekt kills different strains of
S. aureus (also methicillin-resistant strains), without harming the commensal flora or inducing bacterial resistance [
19]. A case series describes clinical improvement in
S. aureus related symptoms, such as folliculitis and superinfected dermatitis, and no development of resistance during long-term daily treatment with Staphefekt based on the minimal inhibitory concentrations of the cultured
S. aureus strains over time [
35]. The lack of resistance induction can be expected, as bacterial killing by an endolysin is independent of the involvement of the bacterial metabolism. The co-evolution of bacteriophages and their host bacteria over millions of years, ensures that phage endolysins attack essential bonds in the bacterial cell wall that cannot be adapted by the host [
22]. Thereby, the lytic activity of exogenously applied endolysins results in lysis of the target cells within seconds, restricting the possibility to adapt and develop resistance. Furthermore, attacking several bonds of the bacterial wall simultaneously by the use of more than one enzymatically active domain in the Staphefekt molecule, makes resistance even less likely to develop [
18].
Because of the proteinaceous nature of endolysins, immunogenicity can be of concern. The literature shows the possibility of the formation of non-neutralizing antibodies against lysins other than Staphefekt [
22]. In a study in which the presence of anti-Staphefekt IgG was evaluated in serum from 21 Staphefekt-naive healthy human donors, pre-existent IgG antibodies recognizing Staphefekt epitopes were detected in all the donors (unpublished data). This can be explained, as humans are exposed daily to
S. aureus and therefore to bacteriophages and their lysins. However, Staphefekt is a large protein molecule (>50 kDa), making penetration through the skin and mucosa and subsequent antibody reactions unlikely [
36].
Calculation of the sample size for this study was hampered as no information was available about the effect of Staphefekt on corticosteroid use and clinical efficacy in AD. Therefore, the study should be considered as hypothesis generating, giving insight into effect sizes and distributions of clinical outcomes. Our expected effect size was based on a study of Hon et al. of the effect of bleach on corticosteroid use in AD. We chose a slightly higher effect size, because we expect the effect of Staphefekt that specifically targets
S. aureus to be more efficacious than bleach. We consider this effect size, a reduction in corticosteroid use of more than 1 day a week over 12 weeks, as clinically relevant because of the (low) risk of side effects and a general reluctance of patients to use corticosteroids, resulting in poor compliance and a lack of treatment efficacy [
37,
38].
No consensus has been reached yet on a standardized outcome for long-term AD control, the primary goal of our study. The Harmonising Outcome Measures for Eczema (HOME) initiative reached consensus on the use of EASI and POEM as doctor-based and patient-based measures of AD severity, both of which are included as secondary outcomes in this trial [
39]. According to the authors of HOME, measures of long-term control could include time to flare and the use of rescue medicine [
39]. Next to corticosteroid use, both these study outcomes were included in this study as secondary parameters.
In conclusion, this study will evaluate the effects of 3-month targeted anti-staphylococcal therapy with Staphefekt in moderate to severe AD. The lack of resistance induction allows long-term treatment with this anti-staphylococcal agent. This study will provide the first data on the use of anti-staphylococcal therapy with Staphefekt in AD and may provide new insights into the role of S. aureus in the pathophysiology of AD.
Trial status
The first patient was included in the study in July 2016. Patient recruitment is currently ongoing and the recruitment is expected to be completed by August 2017.