Skip to main content
Download PDF

Effects of different forms of yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae on growth performance, intestinal development, and systemic immunity in early-weaned piglets

Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology volume 6, Article number: 47 (2015) Cite this article

Abstract

The present study was conducted to determine effects of different forms of yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae, strain Y200007) on the growth performance, intestinal development, and systemic immunity in early-weaned piglets. A total of 96 piglets (14-d old, initial average body weight of 4.5 kg) were assigned to 4 dietary treatments: (1) basal diet without yeast (Control); (2) basal diet supplemented with 3.00 g/kg live yeast (LY); (3) basal diet supplemented with 2.66 g/kg heat-killed whole yeast (HKY); and (4) basal diet supplemented with 3.00 g/kg superfine yeast powders (SFY). Diets and water were provided ad libitum to the piglets during 3-week experiment. Growth performance of piglets was measured weekly. Samples of blood and small intestine were collected at days 7 and 21 of experiment. Dietary supplementation with LY and SFY improved G:F of piglets at days 1-21 of the experiment (P < 0.05) compared to Control group. Serum concentrations of growth hormone (GH), triiodothyronine (T3), tetraiodothyronine (T4), and insulin growth factor 1 (IGF-1) in piglets at day 21 of the experiment were higher when fed diets supplemented with LY and SFY than those in Control group (P < 0.05). Compared to Control group, contents of serum urea nitrogen of piglets were reduced by the 3 yeast-supplemented diets (P < 0.05). Diets supplemented with LY increased villus height and villus-to-crypt ratio in duodenum and jejunum of piglets (P < 0.05) compared to other two groups at day 7 of the experiment. Feeding diets supplemented with LY and SFY increased (P < 0.05) serum concentrations of IgA, IL-2, and IL-6 levels in piglets compared to Control. The CD4+/CD8+ ratio and proliferation of T-lymphocytes in piglets fed diets supplemented with LY were increased compared to that of Control group at day 7 of the experiment (P < 0.05). In conclusion, dietary supplementation with both LY and SFY enhanced feed conversion, small intestinal development, and systemic immunity in early-weaned piglets, with better improvement in feed conversion by dietary supplementation with LY, while dietary supplementation with SFY was more effective in increasing systemic immune functions in early-weaned piglets.

Introduction

Weaning is a critical time in current pig production systems. Weaning piglets have to undergo many challenges such as low feed intake, acute diarrhea and body weight loss, which are caused by nutritional, immunological and psychological disruptions [1, 2]. Nutritional strategies such as dietary supplementation of probiotics are used for improving intestinal development and immune function in weaned piglets [3, 4]. Yeast is one of the most commonly used probiotics in pig production. It has been reported that some strains (Saccharomyces cerevisiae, strain CNCM I-4407) and components of yeasts can improve growth performance and immune function in weaned piglets [5–7]. Dietary supplementation with live yeast had a positive effect on performance and health in weaned piglets through stimulating the immune system and maintaining a favorable intestinal environment [6]. Administration of live yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae significantly increased the villus heights and IgA levels in the ileum [3, 4] and enhanced some immunological indices in the serum of piglets [7], and thus helped reduce postweaning diarrhea after enterotoxigenic E. coli infection. However, the effect of heat-killed yeast on growth performance, intestine development and immune function of weaned piglets remained unknown.

Moreover, previous studies have shown that the nucleotides extracted from yeast were shown to reduce occurrence of diarrhea in early-weaned pigs [8], while its cell wall products extracted from yeast were proved to improve the growth performance and health status of piglets [9]. However, it is difficult and expensive to extract the cell wall components from yeast [10]. Superfine grinding technology is a useful tool for preparing superfine powder with prominent quality in solubility, dispersion, adsorption, chemical reactivity and fluidity [11]. Studies have shown that superfine pulverization significantly enhanced the absorption efficiency of traditional Chinese medicine in rats [12]. Nevertheless, there are relatively few data regarding the comparison effects of live, heat-killed, and superfine yeasts on the intestinal development and postweaning systemic immunity in weaned piglets. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to evaluate how different forms of yeast supplementation influence the growth performance, development of the small intestine and systemic immunity in early-weaned piglets.

Materials and methods

The experimental procedures performed in this study were approved by Animal Care and Use Committee at Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences.

Preparation of different forms of yeasts

The preparations of live yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae (strain CCTCC Y200007) were obtained by high cell density fermentation in a 30 L-fermentor (B. Braun Biotech International GmbH, Melsungen, Germany). The fermentation liquor was subjected to freeze-drying to produce live yeast (LY) with viable yeast cells of 4.3 × 109 CFU/g. Heat-killed yeast (HKY) was prepared by heating LY for 4 h at 105 °C. Superfine powder of yeast (SFY) was prepared from LY by using superfine grinding pulverizer (Jinan Billion Powder Technology Engineering Co., Ltd. China) at 4 °C and immediate screening through a 300 mesh sieve. Different forms of yeasts (LY, HKY, and SFY) were made from the same number of live yeast cells. Viable cells in LY, HKY, and SFY were detected by alkaline methylene blue staining [13] and examined with a Zeiss AxioScope A1 microscope (Carl Zeiss).

Animals, diet, and management

Ninety-six Duroc × Landrace × Yorkshire piglets weaned at 14 d of age (initial average body weight at 4.5 kg) were randomly allotted to 4 treatments: (1) basal diet (Control), without yeast supplement (Table 1); (2) basal diet supplemented with 3.00 g/kg LY; (3) basal diet supplemented with 2.66 g/kg HKY; (4) basal diet supplemented with 3.00 g/kg SPY. There were 4 replicates (pens) for each treatment with 3 males and 3 females per replicate. The experiment lasted for 3 weeks. Body weight of piglet after overnight fasting and feed consumption per replicate was recorded at days 1, 7, 14, and 21 of the experiment to calculate the ADG, ADFI, and G: F accordingly.

Table 1 Composition and nutrients level of the basal diet
Full size table

Sample collections

At days 7 and 21 of the experiment, one piglet of each replicate (n = 4 per treatment) was randomly selected for blood samples collection via the anterior vena cava puncture after overnight fast. Serum samples were separated by centrifugation at 4 °C for 5 min (3,000× g) and stored at -20 °C until analysis. After collection of blood and injection of sodium pentobarbital (50 mg/kg BW, Sigma), one piglet (n = 4 per treatment) with similar BW to average pen weight was chosen from each replicate for sacrifice to collect intestinal tissues. Intestinal segments were defined as duodenum (to about 10 cm distal to the pylorus), jejunum (the middle portion of the small intestine), and ileum (from about 5 cm proximal to the ileocecal junction) according to the methods as previous described [14].

Determinations of serum biochemical parameters

Concentrations of growth hormone (GH), triiodothyronine (T3), tetraiodothyronine(T4), insulin-like growth factors-1 (IGF-1), IL-2, and IL-6 in serum were determined by commercially available ELISA kits (Groundwork Biotechnology Diagnosticate, San Diego, CA). Serum urea nitrogen and IgA concentrations were determined with an automatic biochemical analyzer (CX-5, Beckman, Los Angeles, CA) following the instruction of the commercial kits from Beckman. Meanwhile, flow cytometry was used for detection of T lymphocyte subtype populations (CD4+/CD8+) in peripheral blood of piglets [15]. T-lymphocyte proliferation in peripheral blood of piglets at day 7 of the experiment were assessed using the 3-(4,5-dimethyl-2-thiazolyl)-2,5-diphenyl-2-H-tetrazolium bromide (MTT) assasy according to the method described previously [16].

Small intestine morphology

Approximately 2-cm segments of the duodenum and jejunum at consistent locations were collected immediately, fixed in 10 % formalin, then subsequently embedded, sectioned and stained with hematoxylin and eosin by routine methods. Villus height, crypt depth, and villus-to-crypt ratio (V/C) of the small intestine were measured in approximately 10 microscopic fields using an image analysis system by a blinded investigator [17]. For determination of ultrastructure morphology of small intestine, the duodenum and jejunum samples at consistent locations were fixed in 2.5 % glutaric dialdehyde for 2 h and osmic acid for another 1 h. Samples were then dehydrated and embedded in resin, and cut intro ultrathin sections for staining with uranyl acetate. Samples were examined using a scanning electron microscopy (XL30ESEM) by a blinded investigator.

Statistical analysis

Replicate (pen) was considered as the experimental unit for all the measurements for statistical analyses. Data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA via SPSS 13.0 software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Results were presented as means with standard error (n = 4). Significant differences between groups were compared by Least-significant difference (LSD) for the post-hoc test. Differences were considered statistically significant at P < 0.05.

Results

Morphologies of different forms of yeast preparations

By applying the staining of methylene staining, we found that most of yeast cells were live in LY (Fig. 1a) but few yeast cells were live in HKY (Fig. 1b). There were more than 99 % small fragments of yeast cells in SFY by ultrafine grinding (Fig. 1c), while less than 0.1 % viable yeast cells according to the plate counting result.

Fig. 1
figure 1

The morphologies of different forms of yeast preparations. Different forms of yeasts, including LY (a), HKY (b), and SFY (c) were resuspended and stained with methylene blue, respectively. The samples were examined with a Zeiss AxioScope A1 microscope (Carl Zeiss) at 400 × magnification under visible light. Abbreviations: LY, live yeast; HKY, heat-killed whole yeast; SFY, superfine yeast powders

Full size image

Growth performance

During days 0 to 21 of the experiment, there was no significant difference in ADG and ADFI of piglets among dietary treatments (P > 0.05) (Table 2). However, dietary supplementation with LY improved the G: F (P > 0.05) of piglets at days 15-21 and days 0-21 relative to those fed basal diets and HKY-supplemented diets. There was no significant difference in G: F of piglets between SFY-supplemented group and other three groups (P > 0.05).

Table 2 Effects of different forms of yeasts Saccharomyces cerevisiae on growth performance of pigletsa
Full size table

Determinations of concentrations of serum urea nitrogen and hormones

As shown in Table 3, Serum urea nitrogen level of piglets was significantly reduced when fed the LY -supplemented and SFY-supplemented diets at both days 7 and 21 of the experiment in comparison to those in HKY-supplemented group (P < 0.001). Dietary supplementation with LY significantly increased serum concentrations of GH, T3, T4, and IGF-1 of piglets on day 21 of the experiment when compared with those in Control group (P < 0.05). Moreover, piglets fed diets supplemented with SPY had higher serum concentrations of GH, T3, and T4 than those in Control group (P < 0.05). Concentration of serum T3 and T4 in piglets from HKY-supplemented group were much higher than those from Control group on day 21 (P < 0.05).

Table 3 Effects of different forms of yeasts Saccharomyces cerevisiae on concentrations of serum urea nitrogen and hormones in pigletsa
Full size table

Small intestinal morphology

Villus height and villus-to-crypt ratio in both duodenum and jejunum were increased in piglets fed diets supplemented with LY or SFY when compared with those in Control group at days 7 and 21 of the experiment (P < 0.05) (Table 4 and Fig. 2). There were no differences in crypt depth of duodenum and jejunum in piglets, as well as villus height, crypt depth and villus-to-crypt ratio of ileum in piglets (data not shown) among dietary treatments at days 7 and 21 of the experiment (P > 0.05).

Table 4 Effects of different forms of yeasts Saccharomyces cerevisiae on the morphology of small intestine of pigletsa
Full size table
Fig. 2
figure 2

Analysis of intestinal ultrastructure morphology of piglets at days 7 and 21 by scanning electron microscopy. Duodenal and jejunal samples of piglets from (a) Control group, (b) LY-supplemented group, (c) HKY-supplemented group, and (d) SFY-supplemented group were examined with a scanning electron microscopy (XL30ESEM). Abbreviations: LY, live yeast; HKY, heat-killed whole yeast; SFY, superfine yeast powders

Full size image

Systemic immune parameters

Concentrations of IgA, IL-2 and IL-6 levels in the serum of piglets fed diets supplemented with LY or SPY were significantly increased compared to those in Control group at days 7 and 21 of the experiment (P < 0.05) (Table 5). There were no differences in serum concentrations of IgG, IgM, and TNF-α of piglets among dietary treatment at days 7 and 21 of the experiment (P > 0.05) (data not shown).

Table 5 Effects of different forms of yeasts Saccharomyces cerevisiae on concentrations of IgA, IL-2, and IL-6 in the serum of pigletsa
Full size table

The CD4+/CD8+ ratio of T lymphocytes at day 7 of the experiment was significantly higher in piglets fed the LY -supplemented diets than those in other groups (P = 0.044) (Table 6). T-lymphocyte proliferation rate (LPR) in piglets fed diets supplemented with LY or SFY was significantly increased on day 7 of the experiment compared with that in Control group (P = 0.038). However, there were no differences in percentage of CD4+ T and CD8+ T lymphocytes of piglets among groups at days 7 and 21 of the experiment (P > 0.05). Moreover, LPR of piglets at day 21 of the experiment did not differ among dietary treatment (P > 0.05).

Table 6 Effects of different forms of yeasts Saccharomyces cerevisiae on lymphocyte subtype populations and proliferation of T-lymphocytes of piglets at day 7a
Full size table

Discussion

The present study was conducted to investigate the effect of different forms of yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae on growth performance, intestinal development, and systemic immunity in early-weaned piglets. Our findings showed that the dietary supplementation with LY, but not HKY or SFY improved feed conversion ratio of early-weaned piglets. The enhancement of feed conversion ratio of piglets observed in our study was in agreement with previously published reports on live yeasts [4, 6, 18, 19].

Serum concentrations of hormones and urea nitrogen reflected the metabolic status of animals [20]. Insulin growth factors (IGFs) are integral components of multiple systems controlling both growth and metabolism [21] and serum urea nitrogen could reflect protein metabolism and amino acid balance of animals [22]. In the present study, dietary supplementation with LY and SFY increased serum concentrations of GH, T3, T4, and IGF-1, and reduced serum concentration of serum urea nitrogen in weaned piglets. These results indicated that dietary supplementation with LY and SFY could possibly increase rates of protein synthesis and lower rate of amino acid catabolism in weaned piglets. The positive effect of SPY may be due to the exposure of cell wall components of yeast which is a complex polymer and composed of β-glucans, α-mannans, mannoproteins and a minor component of chitin [23] after superfine grinding.

Weaning leads to villus atrophy due to the increase of apoptosis and the decrease of replacement of enterocytes within the crypts. Villus height and crypt depth were indirect indicators of the maturity and functional capacity of enterocytes, and longer villi provided an increased absorptive area in the small intestine [24]. Previous study has demonstrated that villus height was decreased in weaning transition with a consequently impairment of nutrient absorption [25]. Probiotics has been proved to contribute to the gut health of weaning piglets by enhancing the intestinal epithelial barrier [26]. In the present study, villus height and villus-to-crypt ratio in duodenum and jejunum were increased in piglets fed diets supplemented with LY and SFY. The improvement of small intestinal morphology in piglets fed yeast-supplemented diets is consistent with the previous studies [4, 19, 27]. These results indicated that both live yeast and its cell wall components could help enhance the small intestine development and physical intestinal epithelial barrier of early-weaned piglets. This effect could be due to the possible stimulation of yeast to enhance the polyamines release in piglets in intestinal lumen, which increased the proliferation rate of intestinal epithelial cells [28].

Many studies have demonstrated that supplementation with live yeast or polysaccharides from its cell walls may improve disease resistance and enhance performance through immunostimulation and maintenance of a favorable intestinal environment of animals [3, 9, 29, 30]. Previous study showed that when challenging with enterotoxinogenic E. coli, dietary supplementation with Saccharomyces cerevisiae boulardii increased intestinal IgA secretion and reduced bacterial translocation of piglets [3]. In the present study, dietary supplementation with LY and SFY increased serum IgA concentration in piglets than that in the Control group, which was in consistent with previous reports that live yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae, strain CNCM I-4407) increased piglet immunity during the postnatal period [5, 29]. Thus, the enhancement of systemic immunity by live yeast could possibly explain the improvement of growth performance of piglets when fed diets with supplementation of LY. Moreover, β-glucan from yeast with a thickness of ~115 nm [31], as a potent immunological activator [32–34], enhanced the functional activity of macrophages and activated antimicrobial activity of mononuclear cells and neutrophils [35, 36]. Dietary supplementation with β-glucans can modulate immune function and protect against pathogen infections [30, 37, 38]. Similarly, recent study demonstrated that yeast-derived microparticles (mainly cell walls) induced effective immune response against tumor cells in vivo, thus stimulating both humoral and cellular immunity [39]. Consistent with that, SFY used here was more effective than HKY in immunostimulation, possibly due to its smaller particle size of cell wall components in yeasts increasing the rate and extent of absorption or interaction with the enterocytes.

Conclusions

Collectively, the present study demonstrated that dietary supplementation with LY or SFY improved feed conversion, promoted immune responses, and enhanced development of the small intestine in early-weaned piglets. Further studies are still warranted to illuminate the mechanism of how dietary supplementation with live yeast cells or the cell wall components modulate growth performance and immune function of early-weaned piglets.

Abbreviations

BW:

body weight

CP:

crude protein

GH:

growth hormone

HKY:

heat-killed whole yeast

IGF-1:

insulin growth factor 1

LY:

live yeast

ME:

metabolizable energy

SFY:

superfine yeast powders

T3 :

triiodothyronine

T4 :

tetraiodothyronine

TNF-α:

tumor necrosis factor

References

  1. Lalles JP, Boudry G, Favier C, Le Floch N, Lurona I, Montagne L, et al. Gut function and dysfunction in young pigs: physiology. Anim Res. 2004;53:301–16.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Lallès JP, Bosi P, Smidt H, Stokes CR. Weaning-a challenge to gut physiologists. Livest Sci. 2007;108:82–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Lessard M, Dupuis M, Gagnon N, Nadeau E, Matte JJ, Goulet J, et al. Administration of Pediococcus acidilactici or Saccharomyces cerevisiae boulardii modulates development of porcine mucosal immunity and reduces intestinal bacterial translocation after Escherichia coli challenge. J Anim Sci. 2009;87:922–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Shen YB, Piao XS, Kim SW, Wang L, Liu P, Yoon I, et al. Effects of yeast culture supplementation on growth performance, intestinal health, and immune response of nursery pigs. J Anim Sci. 2009;87(8):2614–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Trckova M, Faldyna M, Alexa P, Sramkova Zajacova Z, Gopfert E, Kumprechtova D, et al. The effects of live yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae on postweaning diarrhea, immune response, and growth performance in weaned piglets. J Anim Sci. 2014;92:767–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Van Heugten E, Funderburke D, Dorton K. Growth performance, nutrient digestibility, and fecal microflora in weanling pigs fed live yeast. J Anim Sci. 2003;81:1004–12.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. White L, Newman M, Cromwell G, Lindemann M. Brewers dried yeast as a source of mannan oligosaccharides for weanling pigs. J Anim Sci. 2002;80:2619–28.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Martinez-Puig D, Manzanilla EG, Morales J, Borda E, Pérez JF, Piñeiro C, et al. Dietary nucleotide supplementation reduces occurrence of diarrhoea in early weaned pigs. Livest Sci. 2007;108:276–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Davis M, Maxwell C, Erf G, Brown D, Wistuba T. Dietary supplementation with phosphorylated mannans improves growth response and modulates immune function of weanling pigs. J Anim Sci. 2004;82:1882–91.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Brady D, Stoll A, Starke L, Duncan J. Chemical and enzymatic extraction of heavy metal binding polymers from isolated cell walls of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biotechnol Bioeng. 1994;44:297–302.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Wu GC, Zhang M, Wang YQ, Mothibe KJ, Chen WX. Production of silver carp bone powder using superfine grinding technology: suitable production parameters and its properties. J Food Eng. 2012;109:730–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ma PY, Fu ZY, Su YL, Zhang JY, Wang WM, Wang H, et al. Modification of physicochemical and medicinal characterization of Liuwei Dihuang particles by ultrafine grinding. Powder Technol. 2009;191:194–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Sami M, Ikeda M, Yabuuchi S. Evaluation of the alkaline methylene blue staining method for yeast activity determination. J Biosci Bioeng. 1994;78:212–6.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Yang KM, Jiang ZY, Zheng CT, Wang L, Yang XF. Effect of Lactobacillus plantarum on diarrhea and intestinal barrier function of young piglets challenged with enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli K88. J Anim Sci. 2014;92:1496-1503.

  15. Williams N, Stahly T, Zimmerman D. Effect of chronic immune system activation on the rate, efficiency, and composition of growth and lysine needs of pigs fed from 6 to 27 kg. J Anim Sci. 1997;75:2463–71.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Jiang ZY, Sun LH, Lin YC, Ma XY, Zheng CT, Zhou GL, et al. Effects of dietary glycyl-glutamine on growth performance, small intestinal integrity, and immune responses of weaning piglets challenged with lipopolysaccharide. J Anim Sci. 2009;87:4050–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Gao YY, Jiang ZY, Lin YC, Zheng CT, Zhou GL, Chen F. Effects of spray-dried animal plasma on serous and intestinal redox status and cytokines of neonatal piglets. J Anim Sci. 2011;89:150–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Mathew A, Chattin S, Robbins C, Golden D. Effects of a direct-fed yeast culture on enteric microbial populations, fermentation acids, and performance of weanling pigs. J Anim Sci. 1998;76:2138–45.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Bontempo V, Giancamill AD, Savoini G, Dell’Orto V, Domeneghini C. Live yeast dietary supplementation acts upon intestinal morpho-functional aspects and growth in weanling piglets. Anim Feed Sci Tech. 2006;129:224–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Etherton TD, Wiggins JP, Chung CS, Evock CM, Rebhun JF, Walton PE. Stimulation of pig growth performance by porcine growth hormone and growth hormone-releasing factor. J Anim Sci. 1986;63:1389–99.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Le Roith D, Bondy C, Yakar S, Liu JL, Butler A. The somatomedin hypothesis: 2001. Endocr Rev. 2001;22:53–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Malmlof K. Amino acid in farm animal nutrition metabolism, partition and consequences of imbalance. Swidish J Agri Res. 1988;18:191–3.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Spring P, Wenk C, Dawson K, Newman K. The effects of dietary mannaoligosaccharides on cecal parameters and the concentrations of enteric bacteria in the ceca of salmonella-challenged broiler chicks. Poult Sci. 2000;79:205–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Hampson D. Alterations in piglet small intestinal structure at weaning. Res Vet Sci. 1986;40:32–40.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Boudry G, Péron V, Huërou-Luron IL, Lallès JP, Sève B. Weaning induces both transient and long-lasting modifications of absorptive, secretory, and barrier properties of piglet intestine. J Nutr. 2004;134:2256–62.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Cheesman SE, Neal JT, Mittge E, Seredick BM, Guillemin K. Epithelial cell proliferation in the developing zebrafish intestine is regulated by the Wnt pathway and microbial signaling via Myd88. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108:4570–7.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Gao J, Zhang HJ, Yu SH, Wu SG, Yoon I, Quigley J, et al. Effects of yeast culture in broiler diets on performance and immunomodulatory functions. Poult Sci. 2008;87:1377–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Costalos C, Skouleri V, Gounaris A, Sevastiadou S, Triandafilidou A, Ekonomidou C, et al. Enteral feeding of premature infants with Saccharomyces boulardii. Early Hum Dev. 2003;74:89–96.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Jurgens M, Rikabi R, Zimmerman D. The effect of dietary active dry yeast supplement on performance of sows during gestation-lactation and their pigs. J Anim Sci. 1997;75:593–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Volman JJ, Ramakers JD, Plat J. Dietary modulation of immune function by β-glucans. Physiol Behav. 2008;94:276–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Soto ER, Ostroff GR. Characterization of multilayered nanoparticles encapsulated in yeast cell wall particles for DNA delivery. Bioconjug Chem. 2008;19:840–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Brown GD, Gordon S. Immune recognition: a new receptor for β-glucans. Nature. 2001;413:36–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Brown GD, Gordon S. Fungal β-glucans and mammalian immunity. Immunity. 2003;19:311–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Chen J, Seviour R. Medicinal importance of fungal β-(1 → 3), (1 → 6)-glucans. Mycol Res. 2007;111:635–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Tzianabos AO. Polysaccharide immunomodulators as therapeutic agents: structural aspects and biologic function. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2000;13:523–33.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Zekovic DB, Kwiatkowski S, Vrvic MM, Jakovljevic D, Moran CA. Natural and modified (1 → 3)-β-D-glucans in health promotion and disease alleviation. Crit Rev Biotechnol. 2005;25:205–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Saegusa S, Totsuka M, Kaminogawa S, Hosoi T. Candida albicans and Saccharomyces cerevisiae induce interleukin-8 production from intestinal epithelial-like Caco-2 cells in the presence of butyric acid. FEMS Immunol Med Mic. 2004;41:227–35.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Manicassamy S, Ravindran R, Deng J, Oluoch H, Denning TL, Kasturi SP, et al. Toll-like receptor 2-dependent induction of vitamin A-metabolizing enzymes in dendritic cells promotes T regulatory responses and inhibits autoimmunity. Nat Med. 2009;15:401–9.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Pan Y, Li XP, Kang TY, Meng H, Chen ZL, Yang L, et al. Efficient delivery of antigen to DCs using yeast-derived microparticles. Sci Rep. 2015;5:10687.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was financially supported by grants from China Agriculture Research System (CARS-36), the Special Fund for Agro-scientific Research in the Public Interest (No. 201403047), National Basic Research Program of China (2013CB127301 and 2013CB127304) and Presidential Foundation of Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences (201312). We gratefully acknowledge W. B. Currie (Cornell University, Ithaca, NY) for statistical advice and for suggestions on presentation of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feed (South China), Ministry of Agriculture of China, State Key Laboratory of Livestock and Poultry Breeding, Guangdong Public Laboratory of Animal Breeding and Nutrition, Institute of Animal Science, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guangzhou, 510640, China

    Zongyong Jiang, Shaoyong Wei, Zhilin Wang, Shenglan Hu, Chuntian Zheng, Youjun Hu, Li Wang, Xianyong Ma & Xuefen Yang

  2. Agro-biological Gene Research Center, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guangzhou, 510640, China

    Zongyong Jiang, Cui Zhu & Zhuang Chen

Authors
  1. Zongyong Jiang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Shaoyong Wei
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Zhilin Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Cui Zhu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Shenglan Hu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Chuntian Zheng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Zhuang Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Youjun Hu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Li Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Xianyong Ma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Xuefen Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zongyong Jiang.

Additional information

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

ZYJ designed the whole experiment and wrote the manuscript. SYW participated in experimental design, animal feeding trial, and sample measurements. ZLW, CZ, SLH, LW, YJH, XYM, XFY, and ZC participated in tissue collections. ZLW, CZ, and SLH contributed to the manuscript revision. ZYJ, SYW, and CTZ performed the statistical analysis. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jiang, Z., Wei, S., Wang, Z. et al. Effects of different forms of yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae on growth performance, intestinal development, and systemic immunity in early-weaned piglets. J Animal Sci Biotechnol 6, 47 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40104-015-0046-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40104-015-0046-8

Keywords

Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology

ISSN: 2049-1891