Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

CYP2D6 Genotyping as an alternative to phenotyping for determination of metabolic status in a clinical trial setting

  • Published:
AAPS PharmSci Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The emerging application of pharmacogenomics in the clinical trial setting requires careful comparison with more traditional phenotyping methodologies, particularly in the drug metabolism area where phenotyping is used extensively. The research objectives of this study were 1) to assess the utility of cytochrome P450 2D6 (CYP2D6) genotyping as an alternative to traditional phenotyping as a predictor of poor metabolizer status; 2) to identify issues for consideration when implementing CYP2D6 genotyping in clinical trials; and 3) to outline the advantages and disadvantages of CYP2D6 genotyping compared with phenotyping. DNA samples obtained from 558 previously phenotyped individuals were blindly genotyped at the CYP2D6 locus, and the genotype-phenotype correlation was then determined. The CYP2D6 genotyping methodology successfully predicted all but 1 of the 46 poor metabolizer subjects, and it was determined that this 1 individual had a novel (presumably inactive) mutation within the coding region. In addition, we identified 2 subjects with CYP2D6 genotypes indicative of poor metabolizers who had extensive metabolizer phenotypes as determined by dextromethorphan/dextrorphan ratios. This finding suggests that traditional phenotyping methods do not always offer 100% specificity. Our results suggest that CYP2D6 genotyping is a valid alternative to traditional phenotyping in a clinical trial setting, and in some cases may be better. We also discuss some of the issues and considerations related to the use of genotyping in clinical trials and medical practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kroemer HK, Eichelbaum M. Molecular basis and clinical consequences of genetic cytochrome P450 2D6 polymorphism. Life Sciences. 1995;56: 2285–2298.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Nebert DW. Polymorphisms in drug-metabolizing enzymes: what is their clinical relevance and why do they exist? Am J Hum Genet. 1997; 60: 265–271.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Sachse C, Brockmöller J, Bauer S, Roots I. Cytochrome P450 2D6 variants in a caucasian population: allele frequencies and phenotypic consequences. Am J Hum Genet. 1997; 60: 284–295.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. West WL, Knight EM, Pradhan S, Hinds TS. Interpatient variability: genetic predisposition and other genetic factors. J Clin Pharmacol. 1997; 37: 635–648.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Lennard MS, Silas JH, Smith AJ, Tucker GT. Determination of debrisoquine and its 4-hydroxy metabolite in biological fluids by gas chromatography with flame ionization and nitrogen-selective detection. J Chromatogr. 1977; 133: 161–166..19

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Chen ZR, Somogyi AA, Bochner F. Simultaneous determination of dextromethorphan three metabolites in plasma and urine using high-performance liquid chromatography with application to their disposition in man. Ther Drug Monit. 1990; 12: 97–104.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Köhler D, Härtter S, Fuchs K, Sieghart W, Hiemke C. CYP2D6 genotype and phenotyping by determination of dextromethorphan and metabolites in serum of healthy controls and of patients under psychotropic medication. Pharmacogenetics. 1997; 7: 453–461.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Özdemir V, Naranjo CA, Hermann N, Reed K, Sellers EM, Kalow W. Paroxetine potentiates the central nervous system side effects of perphenazine: contribution of cytochrome P450 2D6 inhibition in vivo. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1997; 62: 334–347.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Gonzalez FJ, Skoda RC, Kimura S et al. Characterization of the common genetic defect in humans deficient in debrisoquine metabolism. Nature. 1988; 331: 442–446.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Gough AC, Miles JS, Spurr NK, et al. Identification of the primary gene defect at the cytochrome P450 CYP2D locus. Nature. 1990; 347: 772–775.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Saxena R, Shaw GL, Relling MV, et al. Identification of a new variant CYP2D6 allele with a single base deletion in exon 3 and its association with the poor metabolizer phenotype. Hum Mol Genet. 1994; 3: 923–926..20

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Daly AK, Brockmöller J, Broly F, et al. Nomenclature for human CYP2D6 alleles. Pharmacogenetics. 1996; 6: 193–201.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Sachse C, Brockmöller J, Batter S, Reum T, Roots I. A rare insertion in exon 1 of CYP2D6 causes a frameshift and is associated with the poor metabolizer phenotype: CYP2D6*15. Pharmacogenetics. 1996; 6: 269–272.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Yokoi T, Kosaka Y, Chida M et al. A new CYP2D6 allele with a nine base insertion in exon 9 in a Japanese population associated with poor metabolizer phenotype. Pharmacogenetics. 1996; 6: 395–401.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Linder MW, Prough RA, Valdes R Jr. Pharmacogenetics: a laboratory tool for optimizing therapeutic efficiency. Clin Chem. 1997; 43: 254–266.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lovlie R, Daly AK, Idle JR, Steen VM. Characterization of the 16+9 kb and 30+9 kb CYP2D6 XbaI haplotypes. Pharmacogenetics. 1997; 7: 149–152.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Marez D, Legrand M, Sabbagh N, et al. Polymorphism of the cytochrome P450 CYP2D6 gene in a European population: characterization of 48 mutations and 53 alleles, their frequencies and evolution. Pharmacogenetics. 1997; 7: 193–202..21

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Oscarson M, Hidestrand M, Johansson I, Ingelman-Sundberg M. A combination of mutations in the CYP2D6*17 (CYP2D6Z) allele causes alterations in enzyme function. Mol Pharmacol. 1997; 52: 1034–1040.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Daly AK, Fairbrother KS, Andreassen OA, London SJ, Idle JR, Steen VM. Characterization and PCR-based detection of two different hybrid CYP2D7P/CYP2D6 alleles associated with the poor metabolizer phenotype. Pharmacogenetics. 1996; 6: 319–328.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Chen S, Chou W-H, Blouin RA, et al. The cytochrome P450 2D6 (CYP2D6) enzyme polymorphism: screening costs and influence on clinical outcomes in psychiatry. Clin Pharm Ther. 1996; 60: 522–534.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Madsen H, Hansen TS, Brøsen K. Imipramine metabolism in relation to the sparteine oxidation polymorphism a family study. Pharmacogenetics. 1996; 6: 513–519.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Griese E-U, Zanger UM, Brudermanns U, et al. Assessment of the predictive power of genotypes for the catalytic function of CYP2D6 in a German population. Pharmacogenetics. 1998; 8: 15–26.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Sachse C, Brockmöller J, Hildebrand M, Müller K, Roots I. Correctness of prediction of the CYP2D6 phenotype confirmed by genotyping 47 intermediate and poor metabolizers of debrisoquine. Pharmacogenetics. 1998; 8: 181–185.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Brockmöller J, Kirchheiner J, Meisel C, Roots I. Pharmacogenetic diagnostics of cytochrome P450 polymorphisms in clinical drug development and in drug treatment. Pharmacogenomics. In press.

  25. Johansson I, Lundqvist E, Dahl M-L, Ingelman-Sundberg M. PCR-based genotyping for duplicated and deleted CYP2D6 genes. Pharmacogenetics. 1996; 6: 351–355.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Schmid B, Bircher J, Preisig R, Küpfer A. Polymorphic dextromethorphan metabolism: co-segregation of oxidative O-methylation with debrisoquine hydroxylation. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1985; 38: 618–624.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Johansson I, Oscarson M, Yue Q-Y, Bertilsson L, Sjöqvist F, Ingelman-Sundberg M. Genetic analysis of the Chinese cytochrome P4502D locus: characterization of variantCYP2D6 genes present in subjects with diminished capacity for debrisoquine hydroxylation. Mol Pharmacol. 1994; 46: 452–459.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Wang S-L, Lai M-D, Lai M-L, Huang J-d. R296C and other CYP2D6 mutations in Chinese. Pharmacogenetics 1995; 5: 385–388..23

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Aynacioglu AS, Sachse C, Bozkurt A, et al. Low frequency of defective alleles of cytochrome P450 enzymes 2C19 and 2D6 in Turkish population. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1999; 66: 185–192.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Kashuba ADM, Nafziger AN, Keams GL, et al. Quantification of intraindividual variability and the influence of menstrual cycle phase on CYP2D6 activity as measured by dextromethorphan phenotyping. Pharmacogenetics. 1998; 8: 403–410.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T. Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual. 2nd ed. Cold Spring Harbor. NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press: 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Steen VM, Andreassen OA, Daly AK, et al. Detection of the poor metabolizer-associated CYP2D6(D) gene deletion allele by long-PCR technology. Pharmacogenetics. 1995; 5: 215–223.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Douglas AM, Atchison BA, Somogyi AA, Drummer OH. Interpretation of a simple PCR analysis of CYP2D6(A) and CYP2D6(B) null alleles associated with the debrisoquine/sparteine genetic polymorphism. Pharmacogenetics. 1994; 4: 154–158..24

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Patrice M. Milos.

Additional information

Published: October 29, 2000.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

McElroy, S., Richmond, J., Lira, M. et al. CYP2D6 Genotyping as an alternative to phenotyping for determination of metabolic status in a clinical trial setting. AAPS PharmSci 2, 33 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1208/ps020433

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1208/ps020433

Key Words

Navigation