Skip to main content
Hauptrubriken
CME Facharzt-Training Webinare Zeitschriften Bücher e.Medpedia Podcast
Service
Jobbörse Info & Hilfe
Fachgebiete
Anästhesiologie Allgemeinmedizin Arbeitsmedizin Augenheilkunde Chirurgie Dermatologie Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe HNO Innere Medizin Kardiologie Neurologie Onkologie und Hämatologie Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie Pädiatrie Pathologie Psychiatrie Radiologie Rechtsmedizin Urologie Zahnmedizin
Themen
Klimawandel und Gesundheit Neues aus dem Markt COVID-19 Praxis und Beruf Seltene Erkrankungen GOÄ & EBM Panorama
Sammlungen
Kasuistiken Algorithmen & Infografiken Blickdiagnosen Arthropedia FlapFinder (für Dermatochirurgen) Videos Kongressberichterstattung Medizin für Apothekerinnen und Apotheker Für Ärztinnen und Ärzte in Weiterbildung Für Medizinstudierende

Live-Webinar: Aktuelle Leitlinien bei Herz-Kreislauf-Erkrankungen

Konkret geht es um den Diabetes-Patienten mit kardiovaskulären Erkrankungen oder Risiken, die Herzinsuffizienz sowie die kardiovaskuläre Primär- und Sekundärprävention. Sind Sie hier schon auf dem neuesten Stand? Unsere Experten beleuchten, wo und warum das bisherige Procedere geändert werden soll und was in der Praxis sinnvoll ist. Holen Sie sich Ihr Update und 2 CME-Punkte beim MMW-Webinar am 24. April von 17.30 bis 19 Uhr. 
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Annals of Surgical Oncology
Erschienen in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 12/2006

01.12.2006

Immunohistochemical Expression of p16INK4A, Ki-67, and Mcm2 Proteins in Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors: Prognostic Implications and Correlations with Risk Stratification of NIH Consensus Criteria

verfasst von: Hsuan-Ying Huang, MD, Wen-Wei Huang, MD, Ching-Nan Lin, MD, Hock-Liew Eng, MD, Shau-Hsuan Li, MD, Chien-Feng Li, MD, David Lu, MD, Shih-Chen Yu, BS, Ching-Yeh Hsiung, MD

Erschienen in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Ausgabe 12/2006

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Inactivation of p16INK4A promotes G1/S progression of cell cycle. Minichromosome maintenance protein-2 (Mcm2), a novel cell proliferation marker, is known to better correlate with clinical outcomes than Ki-67 in many carcinomas. Since gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) sometimes remains challenging in prognostication, we analyzed the utility of these three markers in GISTs.

Methods

Immunohistochemistry was performed in tissue microarrays of 277 primary GISTs and correlated with NIH consensus criteria and clinical outcomes.

Results

The increment of NIH risk levels significantly correlated with increasing labeling indices (LI) of both Ki-67 (P <.001) and Mcm2 (P <.001) and loss of p16INK4A expression (P <.035). However, the latter aberration did occur in 23% of very low/low-risk GISTs. The relationship between Mcm2 and Ki-67 LIs could be modeled as linear (P <.001, r = 0.697), while Mcm2 LI was considerably higher (P <.001) with a stepwise escalation related to risk levels. Ki-67 LI >5% (P <.0001) and Mcm2 LI >10% (P <.0001) were strongly predictive of inferior disease-specific survival (DSS), while aberrant loss of p16INK4A only reached a trend (P = .0954). In multivariate analyses, independent adverse factors of DSS were high-risk category (RR = 16.93, P <.0001), metastatic disease (RR = 4.12, P = .0015), Ki-67 LI >5% (RR = 3.55, P = .001), and presence of epithelioid histology (RR = 2.17, P = .0308).

Conclusions

Prognostic efficacy of NIH consensus criteria is substantiated. P16INK4A deregulation can occur early in GIST tumorigenesis and marginally correlates with patient survival. Despite Ki-67 LI being an independent prognosticator, simultaneous detection of Mcm2 is recommended as a prognostic adjunct of GISTs, given its better sensitivity and stepwise escalation with increasing risk levels.
Literatur
1.
Fletcher CD, Berman JJ, Corless C, et al. Diagnosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a consensus approach. Hum Pathol 2002; 33(5):459–65PubMedCrossRef
2.
Miettinen M, El-Rifai W, L HLS, Lasota J. Evaluation of malignancy and prognosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a review. Hum Pathol 2002; 33(5):478–83PubMedCrossRef
3.
Corless CL, Fletcher JA, Heinrich MC. Biology of gastrointestinal stromal tumors. J Clin Oncol 2004; 22(18):3813–25PubMedCrossRef
4.
Corless CL, Schroeder A, Griffith D, et al. PDGFRA mutations in gastrointestinal stromal tumors: frequency, spectrum and in vitro sensitivity to imatinib. J Clin Oncol 2005; 23(23):5357–64PubMedCrossRef
5.
Duensing A, Joseph NE, Medeiros F, et al. Protein kinase C theta (PKCtheta) expression and constitutive activation in gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs). Cancer Res 2004; 64(15):5127–131PubMedCrossRef
6.
Blay P, Astudillo A, Buesa JM, et al. Protein kinase C theta is highly expressed in gastrointestinal stromal tumors but not in other mesenchymal neoplasias. Clin Cancer Res 2004; 10(12 Pt 1):4089–95PubMedCrossRef
7.
Antonescu CR, Sommer G, Sarran L, et al. Association of KIT exon 9 mutations with nongastric primary site and aggressive behavior: KIT mutation analysis and clinical correlates of 120 gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Clin Cancer Res 2003; 9(9):3329–37PubMed
8.
Heinrich MC, Rubin BP, Longley BJ, Fletcher JA. Biology and genetic aspects of gastrointestinal stromal tumors: KIT activation and cytogenetic alterations. Hum Pathol 2002; 33(5):484–95PubMedCrossRef
9.
Martin J, Poveda A, Llombart-Bosch A, et al. Deletions affecting codons 557–558 of the c-KIT gene indicate a poor prognosis in patients with completely resected gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a study by the Spanish Group for Sarcoma Research (GEIS). J Clin Oncol 2005; 23(25):6190–8PubMedCrossRef
10.
Lasota J, Kopczynski J, Sarlomo-Rikala M, et al. KIT 1530ins6 mutation defines a subset of predominantly malignant gastrointestinal stromal tumors of intestinal origin. Hum Pathol 2003; 34(12):1306–12PubMedCrossRef
11.
Miettinen M, Sobin LH, Lasota J. Gastrointestinal stromal tumors of the stomach: a clinicopathologic, immunohistochemical, and molecular genetic study of 1765 cases with long-term follow-up. Am J Surg Pathol 2005; 29(1):52–68PubMedCrossRef
12.
Franquemont DW. Differentiation and risk assessment of gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Am J Clin Pathol 1995; 103(1):41–7PubMed
13.
Borden EC, Baker LH, Bell RS, et al. Soft tissue sarcomas of adults: state of the translational science. Clin Cancer Res 2003; 9(6):1941–56PubMed
14.
Ruas M, Peters G. The p16INK4a/CDKN2A tumor suppressor and its relatives. Biochim Biophys Acta 1998; 1378(2):F115–77PubMed
15.
Huang HY, Illei PB, Zhao Z, et al. Ewing sarcomas with p53 mutation or p16/p14ARF homozygous deletion: a highly lethal subset associated with poor chemoresponse. J Clin Oncol 2005; 23(3):548–58PubMedCrossRef
16.
El-Rifai W, Sarlomo-Rikala M, Andersson LC, Knuutila S, Miettinen M. DNA sequence copy number changes in gastrointestinal stromal tumors: tumor progression and prognostic significance. Cancer Res 2000; 60(14):3899–903PubMed
17.
Sabah M, Cummins R, Leader M, Kay E. Loss of heterozygosity of chromosome 9p and loss of p16INK4A expression are associated with malignant gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Mod Pathol 2004; 17(11):1364–71PubMedCrossRef
18.
Ricci R, Arena V, Castri F, et al. Role of p16/INK4a in gastrointestinal stromal tumor progression. Am J Clin Pathol 2004; 122(1):35–43PubMedCrossRef
19.
Schneider-Stock R, Boltze C, Lasota J, et al. Loss of p16 protein defines high-risk patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a tissue microarray study. Clin Cancer Res 2005; 11(2 Pt 1):638–45PubMed
20.
Schneider-Stock R, Boltze C, Lasota J, Miettinen M, Peters B, Pross M, Roessner A, Gunther T. High prognostic value of p16INK4 alterations in gastrointestinal stromal tumors. J Clin Oncol 2003; 21(9):1688–97PubMedCrossRef
21.
Nakamura N, Yamamoto H, Yao T, et al. Prognostic significance of expressions of cell-cycle regulatory proteins in gastrointestinal stromal tumor and the relevance of the risk grade. Hum Pathol 2005; 36(7):828–37PubMedCrossRef
22.
Carrillo R, Candia A, Rodriguez-Peralto JL, Caz V. Prognostic significance of DNA ploidy and proliferative index (MIB-1 index) in gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Hum Pathol 1997; 28(2):160–5PubMedCrossRef
23.
Hasegawa T, Matsuno Y, Shimoda T, Hirohashi S. Gastrointestinal stromal tumor: consistent CD117 immunostaining for diagnosis, and prognostic classification based on tumor size and MIB-1 grade. Hum Pathol 2002; 33(6):669–76PubMedCrossRef
24.
Rudolph P, Gloeckner K, Parwaresch R, Harms D, Schmidt D. Immunophenotype, proliferation, DNA ploidy, and biological behavior of gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a multivariate clinicopathologic study. Hum Pathol 1998; 29(8):791–800PubMedCrossRef
25.
Wong NA, Young R, Malcomson RD, et al. Prognostic indicators for gastrointestinal stromal tumours: a clinicopathological and immunohistochemical study of 108 resected cases of the stomach. Histopathology 2003; 43(2):118–26PubMedCrossRef
26.
Dudderidge TJ, Stoeber K, Loddo M, Atkinson G, Fanshawe T, Griffiths DF, Williams GH. Mcm2, Geminin, and KI67 define proliferative state and are prognostic markers in renal cell carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res 2005; 11(7):2510–7PubMedCrossRef
27.
Gonzalez MA, Pinder SE, Callagy G, et al. Minichromosome maintenance protein 2 is a strong independent prognostic marker in breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2003; 21(23):4306–13PubMedCrossRef
28.
Tachibana KE, Gonzalez MA, Coleman N. Cell-cycle-dependent regulation of DNA replication and its relevance to cancer pathology. J Pathol 2005; 205(2):123–9PubMedCrossRef
29.
MacCallum DE, Hall PA. The location of pKi67 in the outer dense fibrillary compartment of the nucleolus points to a role in ribosome biogenesis during the cell division cycle. J Pathol 2000; 190(5):537–44PubMedCrossRef
30.
Blow JJ, Dutta A. Preventing re-replication of chromosomal DNA. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2005; 6(6):476–486PubMedCrossRef
31.
Kato H, Miyazaki T, Fukai Y, et al. A new proliferation marker, minichromosome maintenance protein 2, is associated with tumor aggressiveness in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. J Surg Oncol 2003; 84(1):24–30PubMedCrossRef
32.
Huang HY, Kang HY, Li CF, Eng HL, Chou SC, Lin CN, Hsiung CY. Skp2 overexpression is highly representative of intrinsic biological aggressiveness and independently associated with poor prognosis in primary localized myxofibrosarcomas. Clin Cancer Res 2006; 12(2):487–98PubMedCrossRef
33.
Powell EL, Leoni LM, Canto MI, et al. Concordant loss of MTAP and p16/CDKN2A expression in gastroesophageal carcinogenesis: evidence of homozygous deletion in esophageal noninvasive precursor lesions and therapeutic implications. Am J Surg Pathol 2005; 29(11):1497–504PubMedCrossRef
34.
Saund MS, Demetri GD, Ashley SW. Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs). Curr Opin Gastroenterol 2004; 20(2):89–94PubMedCrossRef
35.
Emory TS, Sobin LH, Lukes L, Lee DH, O’Leary TJ. Prognosis of gastrointestinal smooth-muscle (stromal) tumors: dependence on anatomic site. Am J Surg Pathol 1999;23(1):82–7PubMedCrossRef
36.
Miettinen M, Makhlouf H, Sobin LH, Lasota J. Gastrointestinal stromal tumors of the jejunum and ileum: a clinicopathologic, immunohistochemical, and molecular genetic study of 906 cases before imatinib with long-term follow-up. Am J Surg Pathol 2006; 30(4):477–89PubMedCrossRef
37.
Nilsson B, Bumming P, Meis-Kindblom JM, et al. Gastrointestinal stromal tumors: the incidence, prevalence, clinical course, and prognostication in the preimatinib mesylate era—a population-based study in western Sweden. Cancer 2005; 103(4):821–9PubMedCrossRef
38.
DeMatteo RP, Lewis JJ, Leung D, Mudan SS, Woodruff JM, Brennan MF. Two hundred gastrointestinal stromal tumors: recurrence patterns and prognostic factors for survival. Ann Surg 2000; 231(1):51–8PubMedCrossRef
39.
Cooper PN, Quirke P, Hardy GJ, Dixon MF. A flow cytometric, clinical, and histological study of stromal neoplasms of the gastrointestinal tract. Am J Surg Pathol 1992; 16(2):163–70PubMedCrossRef
40.
Feakins RM. The expression of p53 and bcl-2 in gastrointestinal stromal tumours is associated with anatomical site, and p53 expression is associated with grade and clinical outcome. Histopathology 2005; 46(3):270–9PubMedCrossRef
41.
Singer S, Rubin BP, Lux ML, Chen CJ, Demetri GD, Fletcher CD, Fletcher JA. Prognostic value of KIT mutation type, mitotic activity, and histologic subtype in gastrointestinal stromal tumors. J Clin Oncol 2002; 20(18):3898–905PubMedCrossRef
42.
Perrone F, Tamborini E, Dagrada GP, et al. 9p21 locus analysis in high-risk gastrointestinal stromal tumors characterized for c-kit and platelet-derived growth factor receptor alpha gene alterations. Cancer 2005; 104(1):159–69PubMedCrossRef
43.
Straume O, Sviland L, Akslen LA. Loss of nuclear p16 protein expression correlates with increased tumor cell proliferation (Ki-67) and poor prognosis in patients with vertical growth phase melanoma. Clin Cancer Res 2000; 6(5):1845–53PubMed
44.
Talve L, Sauroja I, Collan Y, Punnonen K, Ekfors T. Loss of expression of the p16INK4/CDKN2 gene in cutaneous malignant melanoma correlates with tumor cell proliferation and invasive stage. Int J Cancer 1997; 74(3):255–9PubMedCrossRef
45.
Salvesen HB, Das S, Akslen LA. Loss of nuclear p16 protein expression is not associated with promoter methylation but defines a subgroup of aggressive endometrial carcinomas with poor prognosis. Clin Cancer Res 2000; 6(1):153–9PubMed
46.
Klein WM, Hruban RH, Klein-Szanto AJ, Wilentz RE. Direct correlation between proliferative activity and dysplasia in pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PanIN): additional evidence for a recently proposed model of progression. Mod Pathol 2002; 15(4):441–7PubMedCrossRef
47.
Belinsky SA, Nikula KJ, Palmisano WA, et al. Aberrant methylation of p16(INK4a) is an early event in lung cancer and a potential biomarker for early diagnosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1998; 95(20):11891–6PubMedCrossRef
48.
Lee JH, Park SJ, Abraham SC, et al. Frequent CpG island methylation in precursor lesions and early gastric adenocarcinomas. Oncogene 2004; 23(26):4646–54PubMedCrossRef
49.
von Zeidler SV, Miracca EC, Nagai MA, Birman EG. Hypermethylation of the p16 gene in normal oral mucosa of smokers. Int J Mol Med 2004; 14(5):807–11
Metadaten
Titel
Immunohistochemical Expression of p16INK4A, Ki-67, and Mcm2 Proteins in Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors: Prognostic Implications and Correlations with Risk Stratification of NIH Consensus Criteria
verfasst von
Hsuan-Ying Huang, MD
Wen-Wei Huang, MD
Ching-Nan Lin, MD
Hock-Liew Eng, MD
Shau-Hsuan Li, MD
Chien-Feng Li, MD
David Lu, MD
Shih-Chen Yu, BS
Ching-Yeh Hsiung, MD
Publikationsdatum
01.12.2006
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Ausgabe 12/2006
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Elektronische ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-006-9188-4

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 12/2006

Annals of Surgical Oncology 12/2006 Zur Ausgabe

OriginalPaper

REG I Expression Predicts Long-term Survival among Locally Advanced Thoracic Squamous Cell Esophageal Cancer Patients Treated with Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy Followed by Esophagectomy

OriginalPaper

Second Hepatectomy for Recurrent Colorectal Liver Metastasis: Analysis of Preoperative Prognostic Factors

OriginalPaper

Surgery in Recurrent Ovarian Cancer: The Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynaekologische Onkologie (AGO) DESKTOP OVAR Trial

OriginalPaper

Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy for Atypical Melanocytic Lesions with Spitzoid Features

OriginalPaper

Utilizing Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction to Evaluate Prostate Stem Cell Antigen as a Tumor Marker in Pancreatic Cancer

OriginalPaper

Perineal Small Bowel Fistula After Pelvic Exenteration for Cancer: Technical Guidelines for Perineal Fistula

Neu im Fachgebiet Chirurgie

19.04.2024 | EAU 2024 | Kongressbericht | Nachrichten

Ureterstriktur: Innovative OP-Technik bewährt sich

17.04.2024 | Postoperative nausea and vomiting | Nachrichten

Hochrisiko-Eingriffe für postoperative Übelkeit

16.04.2024 | HNO-Chirurgie | Nachrichten

HNO-Op. auch mit über 90?

16.04.2024 | DGIM 2024 | Nachrichten

Kein Abstrich bei chronischen Wunden ohne Entzündungszeichen!
weitere anzeigen

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Aktuelle BDC Leitlinien-Webinare

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom CME-Kurs
CME: 2 Punkte

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur CME-Kurs
CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht, PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske Das Webinar S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“ beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis CME-Kurs
CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.