Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Appraisal of 1 cm Hepatectomy Margins for Intrahepatic Micrometastases in Patients with Colorectal Carcinoma Liver Metastasis

  • Hepatic and Pancreatic Tumors
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

This study sought to clarify the distribution of intrahepatic micrometastases and elucidate an adequate hepatectomy margin for colorectal carcinoma liver metastases.

Methods

Intrahepatic micrometastases in resected specimens from 90 patients who underwent hepatectomy for colorectal carcinoma liver metastases were examined retrospectively. Intrahepatic micrometastases were defined as microscopic lesions spatially separated from the gross tumor. Distances from these lesions to the hepatic tumor borders were measured histologically, and the density of intrahepatic micrometastases (number of lesions/mm2) calculated relative to the advancing tumor border in a zone <1 cm from the border (close) or ≥1 cm away (distant). Median follow-up time was 127 months.

Results

A total of 294 intrahepatic micrometastases were detected in 52 (58%) patients; 95% of these occurred in the close zone. The density of intrahepatic micrometastases was significantly higher in the close zone (mean 74.8 × 10−4  lesions/mm2) than in the distant zone (mean 7.4 × 10−4  lesions/mm2; P < 0.001). Hepatectomy margin status was positive by 0 cm in 10 patients or negative by <1 cm in 51, and by ≥1 cm in 29 patients. The median survival times were 18, 33, and 89 months in patients with hepatectomy margins 0 cm, <1 cm, and ≥1 cm, respectively. Hepatectomy margin status independently influenced survival (P < 0.001) and disease-free survival (P < 0.001).

Conclusion

The currently recommended ≥1 cm hepatectomy margin should remain the goal for resections of colorectal carcinoma liver metastases, based on the distribution of intrahepatic micrometastases and survival risk.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Charnsangavej C, Clary B, Fong Y, et al. Selection of patients for resection of hepatic colorectal metastases: expert consensus statement. Ann Surg Oncol 2006; 13:1261–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Fong Y, Fortner J, Sun RL, et al. Clinical score for predicting recurrence after hepatic resection for metastatic colorectal cancer: analysis of 1001 consecutive cases. Ann Surg 1999; 230:309–18; discussion 318–21

    Google Scholar 

  3. Choti MA, Sitzmann JV, Tiburi MF, et al. Trends in long-term survival following liver resection for hepatic colorectal metastases. Ann Surg 2002; 235:759–66

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Pawlik TM, Scoggins CR, Zorzi D, et al. Effect of surgical margin status on survival and site of recurrence after hepatic resection for colorectal metastases. Ann Surg 2005; 241:715–24

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Korita PV, Wakai T, Shirai Y, et al. Intrahepatic lymphatic invasion independently predicts poor survival and recurrences after hepatectomy in patients with colorectal carcinoma liver metastases. Ann Surg Oncol 2007; 14:3472–80

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hughes KS, Simon R, Songhorabodi S, et al. Resection of the liver for colorectal carcinoma metastases: a multi-institutional study of indications for resection. Registry of Hepatic Metastases. Surgery 1988; 103:278–88

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ekberg H, Tranberg KG, Andersson R, et al. Determinants of survival in liver resection for colorectal secondaries. Br J Surg 1986; 73:727–31

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Cady B, Jenkins RL, Steele GD Jr, et al. Surgical margin in hepatic resection for colorectal metastasis: a critical and improvable determinant of outcome. Ann Surg 1998; 227:566–71

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Wray CJ, Lowy AM, Mathews JB, et al. The significance and clinical factors associated with a subcentimeter resection of colorectal liver metastases. Ann Surg Oncol 2005; 12:1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Shirabe K, Takenaka K, Gion T, et al. Analysis of prognostic risk factors in hepatic resection for metastatic colorectal carcinoma with special reference to surgical margin. Br J Surg 1997; 84:1077–80

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Altendorf-Hofmann A, Scheele J. A critical review of the major indicators of prognosis after resection of hepatic metastases from colorectal carcinoma. Surg Oncol Clin North Am 2003; 12:165–92, xi

    Google Scholar 

  12. Yamamoto J, Sugihara K, Kosuge T, et al. Prognostic support for limited hepatectomy in the treatment of liver metastases from colorectal cancer. Ann Surg 1995; 221:74–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Kokudo N, Miki Y, Sugai S, et al. Genetic and histological assessment of surgical margins in resected liver metastases from colorectal carcinoma: minimum surgical margins for successful resection. Arch Surg 2002; 137:833–40

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Nanko M, Shimada H, Yamaoka H, et al. Micrometastatic colorectal cancer lesions in the liver. Surg Today 1998; 28:707–13

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Sasaki A, Aramaki M, Kawano K, et al. Prognostic significance of intrahepatic lymphatic invasion in patients with hepatic resection due to metastases from colorectal carcinoma. Cancer 2002; 95:105–11

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ambiru S, Miyazaki M, Isono T, et al. Hepatic resection for colorectal metastases: analysis of prognostic factors. Dis Colon Rectum 1999; 42:632–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Yokoyama N, Shirai Y, Ajioka Y, et al. Immunohistochemically detected hepatic micrometastases predict a high risk of intrahepatic recurrence after resection of colorectal carcinoma liver metastases. Cancer 2002; 94:1642–7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Elias D, Cavalcanti A, Sabourin JC, et al. Results of 136 curative hepatectomies with a safety margin of less than 10 mm for colorectal metastases. J Surg Oncol 1998; 69:88–93

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Hamady ZZ, Cameron IC, Wyatt J, et al. Resection margin in patients undergoing hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastasis: a critical appraisal of the 1 cm rule. Eur J Surg Oncol 2006; 32:557–63

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Bodingbauer M, Tamandl D, Schmid K, et al. Size of surgical margin does not influence recurrence rates after curative liver resection for colorectal cancer liver metastases. Br J Surg 2007; 94:1133–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Figueras J, Burdio F, Ramos E, et al. Effect of subcentimeter nonpositive resection margin on hepatic recurrence in patients undergoing hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases: evidences from 663 liver resections. Ann Oncol 2007; 18:1190–5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Greene FL, Page DL, Fleming ID, et al. AJCC Cancer Staging Manual, 6th ed. New York: Springer-Verlag; 2002

    Google Scholar 

  23. Nagakura S, Shirai Y, Yamato Y, et al. Simultaneous detection of colorectal carcinoma liver and lung metastases does not warrant resection. J Am Coll Surg 2001; 193:153–60

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Nagakura S, Shirai Y, Suda T, et al. Multiple repeat resections of intra- and extrahepatic recurrences in patients undergoing initial hepatectomy for colorectal carcinoma metastases. World J Surg 2002; 26:141–7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Terminology Committee of the International Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association: Chairman, Strasberg SM. The Brisbane 2000 Terminology of Liver Anatomy and Resections. HPB 2000; 2:333–9

  26. Wakai T, Shirai Y, Sakata J, et al. Anatomic resection independently improves long-term survival in patients with T1-T2 hepatocellular carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 2007; 14:1356–65

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Taylor M, Forster J, Langer B, et al. A study of prognostic factors for hepatic resection for colorectal metastases. Am J Surg 1997; 173:467–71

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Therneau TM, Grambsch PM, Fleming TR. Martingale based residuals for survival models. Biometrika 1990; 77:147–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Cleveland WS. Robust locally weighted regression and smoothing scatterplots. J Am Stat Assoc 1979; 74:829–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Shirai Y, Wakai T, Ohtani T, et al. Colorectal carcinoma metastases to the liver. Does primary tumor location affect its lobar distribution? Cancer 1996; 77:2213–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Are C, Gonen M, Zazzali K, et al. The impact of margins on outcome after hepatic resection for colorectal metastasis. Ann Surg 2007; 246:295–300

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Busquets J, Pelaez N, Alonso S, et al. The study of cavitational ultrasonically aspirated material during surgery for colorectal liver metastases as a new concept in resection margin. Ann Surg 2006; 244:634–5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Gayowski TJ, Iwatsuki S, Madariaga JR, et al. Experience in hepatic resection for metastatic colorectal cancer: analysis of clinical and pathologic risk factors. Surgery 1994; 116:703–10

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Ohlsson B, Stenram U, Tranberg KG. Resection of colorectal liver metastases: 25-year experience. World J Surg 1998; 22:268–77

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. DeMatteo RP, Palese C, Jarnagin WR, et al. Anatomic segmental hepatic resection is superior to wedge resection as an oncologic operation for colorectal liver metastases. J Gastrointest Surg 2000; 4:178–84

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Yasui K, Shimizu Y. Surgical treatment for metastatic malignancies. Anatomical resection of liver metastasis: indications and outcomes. Int J Clin Oncol 2005; 10:86–96

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Kokudo N, Tada K, Seki M, et al. Anatomical major resection versus nonanatomical limited resection for liver metastases from colorectal carcinoma. Am J Surg 2001; 181:153–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Zorzi D, Mullen JT, Abdalla EK, et al. Comparison between hepatic wedge resection and anatomic resection for colorectal liver metastases. J Gastrointest Surg 2006; 10:86–94

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Finch RJ, Malik HZ, Hamady ZZ, et al. Effect of type of resection on outcome of hepatic resection for colorectal metastases. Br J Surg 2007; 94:1242–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Sugiura T, Nagino M, Oda K, et al. Hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases with macroscopic intrabiliary tumor growth. World J Surg 2006; 30:1902–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Okano K, Yamamoto J, Moriya Y, et al. Macroscopic intrabiliary growth of liver metastases from colorectal cancer. Surgery 1999; 126:829–34

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Toshifumi Wakai MD, PhD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wakai, T., Shirai, Y., Sakata, J. et al. Appraisal of 1 cm Hepatectomy Margins for Intrahepatic Micrometastases in Patients with Colorectal Carcinoma Liver Metastasis. Ann Surg Oncol 15, 2472–2481 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-008-0023-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-008-0023-y

Keywords

Navigation