Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 2/2009

01.02.2009 | Breast Oncology

Breast Specimen Orientation

verfasst von: M. A. Molina, MD, S. Snell, MD, D. Franceschi, MD, M. Jorda, MD, PhD, C. Gomez, MD, F. L. Moffat, MD, J. Powell, MD, E. Avisar, MD

Erschienen in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Ausgabe 2/2009

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Lumpectomy specimens are commonly divided into six sides: superficial, deep, superior, inferior, medial, and lateral. Orienting stitches are placed on the specimen during surgery to allow reorientation by pathology. Despite those efforts, specimen disorientation may occur. The aim of this study was to assess the correlation in orientation between surgeons and pathologists. Lumpectomy specimens were routinely oriented. An additional Prolene suture was randomly placed by the surgeon on one side to be localized by pathology. The results were recorded and the disorientation rate calculated. Specimen size and presence of skin and/or muscle were also recorded. There were 122 lumpectomy specimens prospectively entered. Average specimen volume was 95.5 cm3. Twenty-four specimens had segments of skin or muscle. The additional sutures were evenly divided between the six sides. The overall disorientation rate was 31.1% (95% confidence interval, 23.1–40.2).The side-specific disorientation rates were 43%, 40%, 35%, 29%, 28%, and 14% for the deep, superficial, lateral, medial, superior, and inferior surfaces, respectively (no statistical difference). Presence of skin or muscle on the specimen did not contribute to better orientation. Specimen volumes, however, were highly associated with orientation. Specimens of <20 cm3 had a disorientation rate of 78%, while larger specimen had a disorientation rate of 20% (p < .001). Specimen orientation with stitches placed on two surfaces is associated with a high disorientation rate. Better orientation techniques are necessary to minimize the specimen disorientation.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Fisher B, Redmond C, Poisson R, et al. Eight-year results of a randomized clinical trial comparing total mastectomy and lumpectomy with or without irradiation in the treatment of breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 1989;320:822–8.PubMed Fisher B, Redmond C, Poisson R, et al. Eight-year results of a randomized clinical trial comparing total mastectomy and lumpectomy with or without irradiation in the treatment of breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 1989;320:822–8.PubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Veronesi U, Slavadori B, Luini A. Conservation treatment of early breast cancer: long-term results of 1,232 cases treated wit quadrantectomy, axillary dissection and radiotherapy. Ann Surg. 1990;211:250–9.PubMed Veronesi U, Slavadori B, Luini A. Conservation treatment of early breast cancer: long-term results of 1,232 cases treated wit quadrantectomy, axillary dissection and radiotherapy. Ann Surg. 1990;211:250–9.PubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Smitt MC, Nowels K, Carlson RW, et al. Predictors of reexcision findings and recurrence after breast conservation. Int J Radiat Oncol. 2003;57:979–85.CrossRef Smitt MC, Nowels K, Carlson RW, et al. Predictors of reexcision findings and recurrence after breast conservation. Int J Radiat Oncol. 2003;57:979–85.CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Gwin JL, Eisenberg BL, Hoffman JP, et al. Incidence of gross and microscopic carcinoma in specimens from patients with breast cancer after reexcision lumpectomy. Ann Surg. 1993;218:729–33.PubMedCrossRef Gwin JL, Eisenberg BL, Hoffman JP, et al. Incidence of gross and microscopic carcinoma in specimens from patients with breast cancer after reexcision lumpectomy. Ann Surg. 1993;218:729–33.PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Kearney TJ, Morrow M. Effect of reexcision on the success of breast-conserving surgery. Ann Surg Oncol. 1995;2:303–7.PubMedCrossRef Kearney TJ, Morrow M. Effect of reexcision on the success of breast-conserving surgery. Ann Surg Oncol. 1995;2:303–7.PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Early Breast Cancer Trialists Collaborative Group (EBCTCG). Effects of radiotherapy and differences in the extend of surgery for early breast cancer on local recurrence and 15 year survival. An overview of the randomized trial. Lancet. 2005;366:2087–106. Early Breast Cancer Trialists Collaborative Group (EBCTCG). Effects of radiotherapy and differences in the extend of surgery for early breast cancer on local recurrence and 15 year survival. An overview of the randomized trial. Lancet. 2005;366:2087–106.
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Fischer B, Anderson S, Bryant J, et al. Twenty year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2002;17;347:1233–41.CrossRef Fischer B, Anderson S, Bryant J, et al. Twenty year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2002;17;347:1233–41.CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Wazer DE, Schmidt-Ullrich RK, Schmid CH, et al. The value of breast lumpectomy margin assessment as a predictor of residual tumor burden. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1997;38:291–9.PubMed Wazer DE, Schmidt-Ullrich RK, Schmid CH, et al. The value of breast lumpectomy margin assessment as a predictor of residual tumor burden. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1997;38:291–9.PubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Chagpar A, Yen T, Sahin A, et al. Intraoperative margin assessment reduces reexcision rates in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ treated with breast-conserving surgery. Am J Surg. 2003;186:371–7.PubMedCrossRef Chagpar A, Yen T, Sahin A, et al. Intraoperative margin assessment reduces reexcision rates in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ treated with breast-conserving surgery. Am J Surg. 2003;186:371–7.PubMedCrossRef
10.
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Klimberg VS, Westbrook KC, Korourian S. Use of touch preps for diagnosis and evaluation of surgical margins in breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 1998;5:220–6.PubMedCrossRef Klimberg VS, Westbrook KC, Korourian S. Use of touch preps for diagnosis and evaluation of surgical margins in breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 1998;5:220–6.PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Balch GC, Mithani SK, Simpson JF, et al. Accuracy of intraoperative gross examination of surgical margin status in women undergoing partial mastectomy for breast malignancy. Am Surg. 2005;71:22–8.PubMed Balch GC, Mithani SK, Simpson JF, et al. Accuracy of intraoperative gross examination of surgical margin status in women undergoing partial mastectomy for breast malignancy. Am Surg. 2005;71:22–8.PubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Gibson GR, Lesnikoski B, Yoo J, et al. A comparison of ink-directed and traditional whole-cavity reexcision for breast lumpectomy specimens with positive margins. Ann Surg Oncol. 2001;8:693–704.PubMedCrossRef Gibson GR, Lesnikoski B, Yoo J, et al. A comparison of ink-directed and traditional whole-cavity reexcision for breast lumpectomy specimens with positive margins. Ann Surg Oncol. 2001;8:693–704.PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Hutson TL, Pigalarga R, Osborne MP, et al. The influence of additional surgical margins on the total specimen volume excised and the reoperative rate after breast conserving surgery. Am J Surg. 2006;192:509–12.CrossRef Hutson TL, Pigalarga R, Osborne MP, et al. The influence of additional surgical margins on the total specimen volume excised and the reoperative rate after breast conserving surgery. Am J Surg. 2006;192:509–12.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Breast Specimen Orientation
verfasst von
M. A. Molina, MD
S. Snell, MD
D. Franceschi, MD
M. Jorda, MD, PhD
C. Gomez, MD
F. L. Moffat, MD
J. Powell, MD
E. Avisar, MD
Publikationsdatum
01.02.2009
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Ausgabe 2/2009
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Elektronische ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-008-0245-z

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2009

Annals of Surgical Oncology 2/2009 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

CME: 2 Punkte

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht, PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske Das Webinar S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“ beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.