Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 8/2010

01.08.2010 | Gastrointestinal Oncology

Can Superextended Lymph Node Dissection be Justified for Gastric Cancer with Pathologically Positive Para-aortic Lymph Nodes?

verfasst von: Masanori Tokunaga, MD, Shigekazu Ohyama, MD, PhD, Naoki Hiki, MD, PhD, Tetsu Fukunaga, MD, PhD, Susumu Aikou, MD, PhD, Toshiharu Yamaguchi, MD, PhD

Erschienen in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Ausgabe 8/2010

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

The prognosis of patients with gastric cancer and para-aortic lymph node (PALN) metastasis is poor. Recent Japanese randomized trials concluded that prophylactic PALN dissection is not effective for curable advanced gastric cancer. However, the value of curative resection in patients with pathologically positive PALN is not determined yet.

Methods

We retrospectively identified 178 patients with pathologically positive PALN who underwent curative resection at the Cancer Institute Hospital from 1980 to 2004. Patient characteristics were analyzed and independent prognostic factors for death were identified by Cox proportional hazard model.

Results

Partial gastrectomy was the most frequently performed procedure (142 of 178). Postoperative morbidity and mortality rates were 30 and 2%, respectively, with a 5-year survival rate of 13.0%. Multivariate analysis revealed the total number of positive nodes (hazard ratio, 1.804; 95% confidence interval, 1.221–2.665) and macroscopic type (hazard ratio, 1.697; 95% confidence interval, 1.138–2.530) as independent prognostic factors, while age, sex, histology, pathological tumor depth, and degree of PALN dissection were not statistically significant. The 5-year survival rate increased to 28.6% in patients with ≤15 positive nodes and macroscopic type other than type 4.

Conclusions

Prophylactic PALN dissection can not be justified in curable advanced gastric cancer. However, R0 resection including PALN retrieval might be beneficial in patients with pathologically positive PALN, providing patients are carefully selected and operations are performed safely.
Literatur
1.
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Hartgrink HH, van de Velde CJ, Putter H, et al. Extended lymph node dissection for gastric cancer: who may benefit? Final results of the randomized Dutch gastric cancer group trial. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22:2069–77.CrossRefPubMed Hartgrink HH, van de Velde CJ, Putter H, et al. Extended lymph node dissection for gastric cancer: who may benefit? Final results of the randomized Dutch gastric cancer group trial. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22:2069–77.CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Bonenkamp JJ, Songun I, Hermans J, et al. Randomised comparison of morbidity after D1 and D2 dissection for gastric cancer in 996 Dutch patients. Lancet. 1995;345:745–8.CrossRefPubMed Bonenkamp JJ, Songun I, Hermans J, et al. Randomised comparison of morbidity after D1 and D2 dissection for gastric cancer in 996 Dutch patients. Lancet. 1995;345:745–8.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Cuschieri A, Fayers P, Fielding J, et al. Postoperative morbidity and mortality after D1 and D2 resections for gastric cancer: preliminary results of the MRC randomised controlled surgical trial. The Surgical Cooperative Group. Lancet. 1996;347:995–9.CrossRefPubMed Cuschieri A, Fayers P, Fielding J, et al. Postoperative morbidity and mortality after D1 and D2 resections for gastric cancer: preliminary results of the MRC randomised controlled surgical trial. The Surgical Cooperative Group. Lancet. 1996;347:995–9.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Wu CW, Hsiung CA, Lo SS, et al. Nodal dissection for patients with gastric cancer: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2006;7:309–15.CrossRefPubMed Wu CW, Hsiung CA, Lo SS, et al. Nodal dissection for patients with gastric cancer: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2006;7:309–15.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Maruyama K, Okabayashi K, Kinoshita T. Progress in gastric cancer surgery in Japan and its limits of radicality. World J Surg. 1987;11:418–25.CrossRefPubMed Maruyama K, Okabayashi K, Kinoshita T. Progress in gastric cancer surgery in Japan and its limits of radicality. World J Surg. 1987;11:418–25.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Maruyama K, Gunven P, Okabayashi K, Sasako M, Kinoshita T. Lymph node metastases of gastric cancer. General pattern in 1931 patients. Ann Surg. 1989;210:596–602.CrossRefPubMed Maruyama K, Gunven P, Okabayashi K, Sasako M, Kinoshita T. Lymph node metastases of gastric cancer. General pattern in 1931 patients. Ann Surg. 1989;210:596–602.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Japanese Gastric Cancer A. Japanese classification of gastric carcinoma—2nd English edition. Gastric Cancer. 1998;1:10–24.CrossRef Japanese Gastric Cancer A. Japanese classification of gastric carcinoma—2nd English edition. Gastric Cancer. 1998;1:10–24.CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Maeta M, Yamashiro H, Saito H, et al. A prospective pilot study of extended (D3) and superextended para-aortic lymphadenectomy (D4) in patients with T3 or T4 gastric cancer managed by total gastrectomy. Surgery. 1999;125:325–31.PubMed Maeta M, Yamashiro H, Saito H, et al. A prospective pilot study of extended (D3) and superextended para-aortic lymphadenectomy (D4) in patients with T3 or T4 gastric cancer managed by total gastrectomy. Surgery. 1999;125:325–31.PubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Kunisaki C, Akiyama H, Nomura M, et al. Comparison of surgical results of D2 versus D3 gastrectomy (para-aortic lymph node dissection) for advanced gastric carcinoma: a multi-institutional study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2006;13:659–67.CrossRefPubMed Kunisaki C, Akiyama H, Nomura M, et al. Comparison of surgical results of D2 versus D3 gastrectomy (para-aortic lymph node dissection) for advanced gastric carcinoma: a multi-institutional study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2006;13:659–67.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Kulig J, Popiela T, Kolodziejczyk P, Sierzega M, Szczepanik A. Standard D2 versus extended D2 (D2+) lymphadenectomy for gastric cancer: an interim safety analysis of a multicenter, randomized, clinical trial. Am J Surg. 2007;193:10–5.CrossRefPubMed Kulig J, Popiela T, Kolodziejczyk P, Sierzega M, Szczepanik A. Standard D2 versus extended D2 (D2+) lymphadenectomy for gastric cancer: an interim safety analysis of a multicenter, randomized, clinical trial. Am J Surg. 2007;193:10–5.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Sasako M, Sano T, Yamamoto S, et al. D2 lymphadenectomy alone or with para-aortic nodal dissection for gastric cancer. N Engl J Med. 2008;359:453–62.CrossRefPubMed Sasako M, Sano T, Yamamoto S, et al. D2 lymphadenectomy alone or with para-aortic nodal dissection for gastric cancer. N Engl J Med. 2008;359:453–62.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Yonemura Y, Wu CC, Fukushima N, et al. Randomized clinical trial of D2 and extended paraaortic lymphadenectomy in patients with gastric cancer. Int J Clin Oncol. 2008;13:132–7.CrossRefPubMed Yonemura Y, Wu CC, Fukushima N, et al. Randomized clinical trial of D2 and extended paraaortic lymphadenectomy in patients with gastric cancer. Int J Clin Oncol. 2008;13:132–7.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Natsugoe S, Nakashima S, Matsumoto M, et al. Paraaortic lymph node micrometastasis and tumor cell microinvolvement in advanced gastric carcinoma. Gastric Cancer. 1999;2:179–85.CrossRefPubMed Natsugoe S, Nakashima S, Matsumoto M, et al. Paraaortic lymph node micrometastasis and tumor cell microinvolvement in advanced gastric carcinoma. Gastric Cancer. 1999;2:179–85.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Sobin LH, Wittekind D, editors. TNM classification of malignant tumors. 6th ed. New York: Wiley; 2002. Sobin LH, Wittekind D, editors. TNM classification of malignant tumors. 6th ed. New York: Wiley; 2002.
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Cervantes A, Rosello S, Roda D, Rodriguez-Braun E. The treatment of advanced gastric cancer: current strategies and future perspectives. Ann Oncol. 2008;19(Suppl 5):v103–7.CrossRefPubMed Cervantes A, Rosello S, Roda D, Rodriguez-Braun E. The treatment of advanced gastric cancer: current strategies and future perspectives. Ann Oncol. 2008;19(Suppl 5):v103–7.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Koizumi W, Narahara H, Hara T, et al. S-1 plus cisplatin versus S-1 alone for first-line treatment of advanced gastric cancer (SPIRITS trial): a phase III trial. Lancet Oncol. 2008;9:215–21.CrossRefPubMed Koizumi W, Narahara H, Hara T, et al. S-1 plus cisplatin versus S-1 alone for first-line treatment of advanced gastric cancer (SPIRITS trial): a phase III trial. Lancet Oncol. 2008;9:215–21.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Sakuramoto S, Sasako M, Yamaguchi T, et al. Adjuvant chemotherapy for gastric cancer with S-1, an oral fluoropyrimidine. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:1810–20.CrossRefPubMed Sakuramoto S, Sasako M, Yamaguchi T, et al. Adjuvant chemotherapy for gastric cancer with S-1, an oral fluoropyrimidine. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:1810–20.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Cunningham D, Allum WH, Stenning SP, et al. Perioperative chemotherapy versus surgery alone for resectable gastroesophageal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:11–20.CrossRefPubMed Cunningham D, Allum WH, Stenning SP, et al. Perioperative chemotherapy versus surgery alone for resectable gastroesophageal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:11–20.CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Macdonald JS, Smalley SR, Benedetti J, et al. Chemoradiotherapy after surgery compared with surgery alone for adenocarcinoma of the stomach or gastroesophageal junction. N Engl J Med. 2001;345:725–30.CrossRefPubMed Macdonald JS, Smalley SR, Benedetti J, et al. Chemoradiotherapy after surgery compared with surgery alone for adenocarcinoma of the stomach or gastroesophageal junction. N Engl J Med. 2001;345:725–30.CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Sasako M. Risk factors for surgical treatment in the Dutch Gastric Cancer Trial. Br J Surg. 1997;84:1567–71.CrossRefPubMed Sasako M. Risk factors for surgical treatment in the Dutch Gastric Cancer Trial. Br J Surg. 1997;84:1567–71.CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Can Superextended Lymph Node Dissection be Justified for Gastric Cancer with Pathologically Positive Para-aortic Lymph Nodes?
verfasst von
Masanori Tokunaga, MD
Shigekazu Ohyama, MD, PhD
Naoki Hiki, MD, PhD
Tetsu Fukunaga, MD, PhD
Susumu Aikou, MD, PhD
Toshiharu Yamaguchi, MD, PhD
Publikationsdatum
01.08.2010
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Ausgabe 8/2010
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Elektronische ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-010-0969-4

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 8/2010

Annals of Surgical Oncology 8/2010 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

CME: 2 Punkte

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht, PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske Das Webinar S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“ beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.