Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 9/2010

01.09.2010 | Breast Oncology

Is there a Role for MRI in the Preoperative Assessment of Patients with DCIS?

verfasst von: Lisa R. Allen, MD, Claudia E. Lago-Toro, MD, Jenevieve H. Hughes, MD, Eduardo Careaga, MD, Anjeanette T. Brown, MD, Michael Chernick, MA, PhD, Andrea V. Barrio, MD, Thomas G. Frazier, MD

Erschienen in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Ausgabe 9/2010

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is used to identify residual and additional disease in patients with invasive carcinoma. The use of MRI in assessing extent of disease for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is less well defined. This study assessed the value of MRI in the preoperative evaluation of DCIS.

Materials and Methods

We identified 98 patients with DCIS in 2007. Of these, 63 underwent stereotactic biopsy, followed by MRI. There were 35 who underwent stereotactic biopsy alone. Concordance between MRI and histopathology was defined as the presence or absence of residual disease.

Results

There was no significant difference in mastectomy rates between the MRI and non-MRI group (20.3% vs 25.7%, P = .62). In patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery (BCS), there were fewer positive margins in the MRI versus the non-MRI group (21.2% vs 30.8%, P = .41). Of the 64 cases that underwent preoperative MRI, 43 (67.2%) were concordant. Also, 15 of 43 cases (34.8%) had MRI results that accurately predicted pathologic size. In 28 of 43 patients (65.2%), MRI overestimated disease in 20, by a mean of 1.97 cm. In patients with MRI tumor size >2 cm, MRI overestimated disease by a mean of 3.17 cm. Of the 64 cases, 21 (32.8%) were discordant. Also, 10 of 21 (47.6%) had a positive MRI and no residual disease on histopathology, and 11 of 21 (52.3%) had negative MRI and residual disease on pathology.

Conclusions

MRI does not accurately predict extent of disease in patients with extensive DCIS. In patients with MRI tumor size ≤2 cm, MRI may assist in surgical planning. MRI results in patients with DCIS should be interpreted with caution; decision for mastectomy should not be made on MRI findings alone.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Swallow CJ, Van Zee KJ, Sacchini V, Borgen PI. Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: progress and controversy. Curr Probl Surg. 1996;33:553–608.CrossRefPubMed Swallow CJ, Van Zee KJ, Sacchini V, Borgen PI. Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: progress and controversy. Curr Probl Surg. 1996;33:553–608.CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Fisher B, Dignam J, Wolmark N, Mamounas E, Costantino J, Poller W, et al. Lumpectomy and radiation therapy for the treatment of intraductal breast cancer: findings from National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project B-17. J Clin Oncol. 1998;16:441–52.PubMed Fisher B, Dignam J, Wolmark N, Mamounas E, Costantino J, Poller W, et al. Lumpectomy and radiation therapy for the treatment of intraductal breast cancer: findings from National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project B-17. J Clin Oncol. 1998;16:441–52.PubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Holland R, Veling SH, Mravunac M, Hendriks JH. Histologic multifocality of Tis, T1-2 breast carcinomas: implications for clinical trials of breast conserving surgery. Cancer. 1985;56:979–90.CrossRefPubMed Holland R, Veling SH, Mravunac M, Hendriks JH. Histologic multifocality of Tis, T1-2 breast carcinomas: implications for clinical trials of breast conserving surgery. Cancer. 1985;56:979–90.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Bleicher RJ, Morrow M. MRI and breast cancer: role in detection, diagnosis, and staging. Oncology (Williston Park). 2007;21:1521–8. Bleicher RJ, Morrow M. MRI and breast cancer: role in detection, diagnosis, and staging. Oncology (Williston Park). 2007;21:1521–8.
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Menell JH, Morris EA, Dershaw DD, Abramson AF, Brogi E, Liberman L. Determination of the presence and extent of pure ductal carcinoma in situ by mammography and magnetic resonance imaging. Breast J. 2005:11;382–90.CrossRefPubMed Menell JH, Morris EA, Dershaw DD, Abramson AF, Brogi E, Liberman L. Determination of the presence and extent of pure ductal carcinoma in situ by mammography and magnetic resonance imaging. Breast J. 2005:11;382–90.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Hwang ES, Kinkel K, Esserman LJ, Lu Y, Weidner N, Hylton NM. Magnetic resonance imaging in patients diagnosed with ductal carcinoma in situ: value in the diagnosis of residual disease, occult invasion, and multicentricity. Ann Surg Oncol. 2003;10:381–8.CrossRefPubMed Hwang ES, Kinkel K, Esserman LJ, Lu Y, Weidner N, Hylton NM. Magnetic resonance imaging in patients diagnosed with ductal carcinoma in situ: value in the diagnosis of residual disease, occult invasion, and multicentricity. Ann Surg Oncol. 2003;10:381–8.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Hansen NM, Growney A. Breast cancer: pre- and postoperative imaging for staging. Surg Oncol Clin N Am. 2007;16:447–63.CrossRefPubMed Hansen NM, Growney A. Breast cancer: pre- and postoperative imaging for staging. Surg Oncol Clin N Am. 2007;16:447–63.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Gilles R, Zafrani B, Guinebretiere JM, Meunier M, Lucidarme O, Tardivon AA, et al. Ductal carcinoma in situ: MR imaging-histopathologic correlation. Radiology. 1995;196:415–9.PubMed Gilles R, Zafrani B, Guinebretiere JM, Meunier M, Lucidarme O, Tardivon AA, et al. Ductal carcinoma in situ: MR imaging-histopathologic correlation. Radiology. 1995;196:415–9.PubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Sardanelli F, Giuseppetti GM, Panizza P, Bazzocchi M, Fausto A, Simonetti G, et al. Sensitivity of MRI versus mammography for detecting foci of multifocal, multicentric breast cancer in fatty and dense breasts using the whole-breast pathologic examination as a gold standard. AJR Am J. Roentgenol. 2004;183:1149–57.PubMed Sardanelli F, Giuseppetti GM, Panizza P, Bazzocchi M, Fausto A, Simonetti G, et al. Sensitivity of MRI versus mammography for detecting foci of multifocal, multicentric breast cancer in fatty and dense breasts using the whole-breast pathologic examination as a gold standard. AJR Am J. Roentgenol. 2004;183:1149–57.PubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Harms SE, Flamig DP, Hesley KL, Meiches MD, Jensen RA, Evans WP, et al. MR imaging of the breast with rotating delivery of excitation off resonance: clinical experience with pathologic correlation. Radiology. 1993;187:493–501.PubMed Harms SE, Flamig DP, Hesley KL, Meiches MD, Jensen RA, Evans WP, et al. MR imaging of the breast with rotating delivery of excitation off resonance: clinical experience with pathologic correlation. Radiology. 1993;187:493–501.PubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Bazzocchi M, Zuiani C, Panizza P, Del Frate C, Soldano F, Isola M, et al. Contrast-enhanced breast MRI in patients with suspicious microcalcifications on mammography: results of a multicenter trial. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006;186:1723–32.CrossRefPubMed Bazzocchi M, Zuiani C, Panizza P, Del Frate C, Soldano F, Isola M, et al. Contrast-enhanced breast MRI in patients with suspicious microcalcifications on mammography: results of a multicenter trial. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006;186:1723–32.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Schouten van der Velden AP, Boetes C, Bult P, Wobbes T. The value of magnetic resonance imaging in diagnosis and size assessment of in situ and small invasive breast carcinoma. Am J Surg. 2006;192:172–8.CrossRefPubMed Schouten van der Velden AP, Boetes C, Bult P, Wobbes T. The value of magnetic resonance imaging in diagnosis and size assessment of in situ and small invasive breast carcinoma. Am J Surg. 2006;192:172–8.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Katipamula R, Degnim AC, Hoskin TL, Boughey JC, Loprinzi C, Grant CS, et al. Trends in mastectomy rates at the Mayo Clinic Rochester: effect of surgical year and preoperative MRI. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:4082–8.CrossRefPubMed Katipamula R, Degnim AC, Hoskin TL, Boughey JC, Loprinzi C, Grant CS, et al. Trends in mastectomy rates at the Mayo Clinic Rochester: effect of surgical year and preoperative MRI. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:4082–8.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Bleicher RJ, Ciocca RM, Egleston BL, Sesa L, Evers K, Sigurdson ER, et al. Association of routine pretreatment magnetic resonance imaging with time to surgery, mastectomy rate, and margin status. J Am Coll Surg. 2009;209:180–7.CrossRefPubMed Bleicher RJ, Ciocca RM, Egleston BL, Sesa L, Evers K, Sigurdson ER, et al. Association of routine pretreatment magnetic resonance imaging with time to surgery, mastectomy rate, and margin status. J Am Coll Surg. 2009;209:180–7.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Sardanelli F, Bacigalupo L, Carbonaro L, Esseridou A, Giuseppetti GM, Panizza P, et al. What is the sensitivity of mammography and dynamic MR imaging for DCIS if the whole-breast histopathology is used as a reference standard? Radiol Med. 2008;113:439–51.CrossRefPubMed Sardanelli F, Bacigalupo L, Carbonaro L, Esseridou A, Giuseppetti GM, Panizza P, et al. What is the sensitivity of mammography and dynamic MR imaging for DCIS if the whole-breast histopathology is used as a reference standard? Radiol Med. 2008;113:439–51.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Onesti JK, Mangus BE, Helmer SD, Osland JS. Breast Cancer Tumor Size: Correlation between magnetic resonance imaging and pathology measurements. Am J Surg. 2008;196:844–50.CrossRefPubMed Onesti JK, Mangus BE, Helmer SD, Osland JS. Breast Cancer Tumor Size: Correlation between magnetic resonance imaging and pathology measurements. Am J Surg. 2008;196:844–50.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Berg WA, Gutierrez L, NessAiver MS, Carter WB, Bhargavan M, Lewis RS, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of mammography. Clinical examination, US, and MR Imaging of preoperative assessment of breast cancer. Radiology. 2004;233:830–49.CrossRefPubMed Berg WA, Gutierrez L, NessAiver MS, Carter WB, Bhargavan M, Lewis RS, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of mammography. Clinical examination, US, and MR Imaging of preoperative assessment of breast cancer. Radiology. 2004;233:830–49.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Orel SG, Mendonca MH, Reynolds C, Schnall MD, Solin LJ, Sullivan DC. MR Imaging of ductal carcinoma in situ. Radiology. 1997;202:413–20.PubMed Orel SG, Mendonca MH, Reynolds C, Schnall MD, Solin LJ, Sullivan DC. MR Imaging of ductal carcinoma in situ. Radiology. 1997;202:413–20.PubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Morris E, Liberman L. Breast MRI: diagnosis and intervention. New York: Springer Science and Business Media; 2005. Morris E, Liberman L. Breast MRI: diagnosis and intervention. New York: Springer Science and Business Media; 2005.
Metadaten
Titel
Is there a Role for MRI in the Preoperative Assessment of Patients with DCIS?
verfasst von
Lisa R. Allen, MD
Claudia E. Lago-Toro, MD
Jenevieve H. Hughes, MD
Eduardo Careaga, MD
Anjeanette T. Brown, MD
Michael Chernick, MA, PhD
Andrea V. Barrio, MD
Thomas G. Frazier, MD
Publikationsdatum
01.09.2010
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Ausgabe 9/2010
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Elektronische ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-010-1000-9

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 9/2010

Annals of Surgical Oncology 9/2010 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

CME: 2 Punkte

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht, PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske Das Webinar S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“ beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.