Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 2/2012

01.02.2012 | Gynecologic Oncology

A Risk Model for Secondary Cytoreductive Surgery in Recurrent Ovarian Cancer: An Evidence-Based Proposal for Patient Selection

verfasst von: Wen-Juan Tian, MD, Dennis S. Chi, MD, Jalid Sehouli, MD, PhD, Claes G. Tropé, MD, PhD, Rong Jiang, MD, Ali Ayhan, MD, Gennaro Cormio, MD, PhD, Yan Xing, MD, PhD, MSc, Georg-Peter Breitbach, MD, PhD, Elena Ioana Braicu, MD, Catherine A. Rabbitt, MMS, Halldis Oksefjell, MD, PhD, Christina Fotopoulou, MD, PhD, Hans-Gerd Meerpohl, MD, PhD, Andreas du Bois, MD, PhD, Jonathan S. Berek, MD, MMS, Rong-Yu Zang, MD, PhD, Philipp Harter, MD, PhD

Erschienen in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Ausgabe 2/2012

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

To develop a risk model for predicting complete secondary cytoreductive surgery (SCR) in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer.

Methods

Individual data of 1075 patients with recurrent ovarian cancer undergoing SCR from 7 worldwide centers were pooled and analyzed. The risk model was developed based on the factors impacting on SCR surgical outcome. Additional data on 117 patients who were not included in the development of the model were used for external validation and to assess the discrimination of the model.

Results

Of the 1075 patients, 434 (40.4%) underwent complete resection. Complete secondary cytoreduction was associated with six variables: FIGO stage (odds ratio [OR] = 1.32, 95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 0.97–1.80), residual disease after primary cytoreduction (OR = 1.69, 95% CI: 1.26–2.27), progression-free interval (OR = 2.27, 95% CI: 1.71–3.01), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (OR = 2.23, 95% CI: 1.45–3.44), CA125 (OR = 1.85, 95% CI: 1.41–2.44), and ascites at recurrence (OR = 2.79, 95% CI: 1.88–4.13). These variables were entered into the risk model and assigned scores ranging from 0 to 11.9. Patients with total scores of 0–4.7 were categorized as the low-risk group, in which the proportion of complete cytoreduction was 53.4% compared with 20.1% in the high-risk group (OR = 4.55, 95% CI: 3.43–6.04). In external validation, the sensitivity and specificity was 83.3% and 57.6%, respectively. Area under the curve of the receiver-operating characteristics for predicting complete SCR was 0.68 (95% CI: 0.60–0.79).

Conclusions

This model and scoring system may well predict the outcome of SCR and could potentially be useful in future clinical trials to determine which patients with recurrent ovarian cancer should have SCR as part of their management.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Winter WE 3rd, Maxwell GL, Tian C, Carlson JW, Ozols RF, Rose PG, et al. Prognostic factors for stage III epithelial ovarian cancer: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:3621–7.PubMedCrossRef Winter WE 3rd, Maxwell GL, Tian C, Carlson JW, Ozols RF, Rose PG, et al. Prognostic factors for stage III epithelial ovarian cancer: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:3621–7.PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat du Bois A, Reuss A, Pujade-Lauraine A, Harter P, Ray-Coquard I, Pfisterer J. Role of surgical outcome as prognostic factor in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: a combined exploratory analysis of 3 prospectively randomized phase 3 multicenter trials: by the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynaekologische Onkologie Studiengruppe Ovarialkarzinom (AGO-OVAR) and the Groupe d’Investigateurs Nationaux Pour les Etudes des Cancers de l’Ovaire (GINECO). Cancer. 2009;15:1234–44.CrossRef du Bois A, Reuss A, Pujade-Lauraine A, Harter P, Ray-Coquard I, Pfisterer J. Role of surgical outcome as prognostic factor in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: a combined exploratory analysis of 3 prospectively randomized phase 3 multicenter trials: by the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynaekologische Onkologie Studiengruppe Ovarialkarzinom (AGO-OVAR) and the Groupe d’Investigateurs Nationaux Pour les Etudes des Cancers de l’Ovaire (GINECO). Cancer. 2009;15:1234–44.CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Harter P, Bois AD, Hahmann M, Hasenburg A, Burges A, Loilbl S, et al. Surgery in recurrent ovarian cancer: the arbeitsgemeinschaft gynaekologische onkologie (AGO) DESKTOP OVAR Trial. Ann Surg Oncol. 2006;13:1702–10.PubMedCrossRef Harter P, Bois AD, Hahmann M, Hasenburg A, Burges A, Loilbl S, et al. Surgery in recurrent ovarian cancer: the arbeitsgemeinschaft gynaekologische onkologie (AGO) DESKTOP OVAR Trial. Ann Surg Oncol. 2006;13:1702–10.PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Zang RY, Zhang ZY, Li ZT, Chen J, Tang MQ, Liu Q, et al. Effect of cytoreductive surgery on survival of patients with recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer. J Surg Oncol. 2000,75:24–30.PubMedCrossRef Zang RY, Zhang ZY, Li ZT, Chen J, Tang MQ, Liu Q, et al. Effect of cytoreductive surgery on survival of patients with recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer. J Surg Oncol. 2000,75:24–30.PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Eisenkop SM, Friedman RL, Spirtos NM. The role of secondary cytoreductive surgery in the treatment of patients with recurrent epithelial ovarian carcinoma. Cancer. 2000;88:144–53.PubMedCrossRef Eisenkop SM, Friedman RL, Spirtos NM. The role of secondary cytoreductive surgery in the treatment of patients with recurrent epithelial ovarian carcinoma. Cancer. 2000;88:144–53.PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Salani R, Santillan A, Zahurak ML, Giuntoli RL 2nd, Gardner GJ, Armstrong DK, Bristow RE. Secondary cytoreductive surgery for localized, recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer: analysis of prognostic factors and survival outcome. Cancer. 2007;109:685–91.PubMedCrossRef Salani R, Santillan A, Zahurak ML, Giuntoli RL 2nd, Gardner GJ, Armstrong DK, Bristow RE. Secondary cytoreductive surgery for localized, recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer: analysis of prognostic factors and survival outcome. Cancer. 2007;109:685–91.PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Zang RY, Li ZT, Tang J, Cheng X, Cai SM, Zhang ZY, et al. Secondary cytoreductive surgery for patients with relapsed epithelial ovarian carcinoma: who benefits? Cancer. 2004;100:1152–61.PubMedCrossRef Zang RY, Li ZT, Tang J, Cheng X, Cai SM, Zhang ZY, et al. Secondary cytoreductive surgery for patients with relapsed epithelial ovarian carcinoma: who benefits? Cancer. 2004;100:1152–61.PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Chi DS, McCaughty K, Diaz JP, Huh J, Schwabenbauer S, et al. Guidelines and selection criteria for secondary cytoreductive surgery in patients with recurrent, platinum-sensitive epithelial ovarian carcinoma. Cancer. 2006;106:1933–9.PubMedCrossRef Chi DS, McCaughty K, Diaz JP, Huh J, Schwabenbauer S, et al. Guidelines and selection criteria for secondary cytoreductive surgery in patients with recurrent, platinum-sensitive epithelial ovarian carcinoma. Cancer. 2006;106:1933–9.PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Harter P, Sehouli J, Reuss A, Hasenburg A, Scambia G, Cibula D, et al. Prospective validation study of a predictive score for operability of recurrent ovarian cancer: the DESKTOP II study. A project of the AGO Kommission OVAR, AGO Study Group, NOGGO, AGO-Austria, and MITO. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2011;21:289–95.PubMedCrossRef Harter P, Sehouli J, Reuss A, Hasenburg A, Scambia G, Cibula D, et al. Prospective validation study of a predictive score for operability of recurrent ovarian cancer: the DESKTOP II study. A project of the AGO Kommission OVAR, AGO Study Group, NOGGO, AGO-Austria, and MITO. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2011;21:289–95.PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Zang RY, Harter P, Chi DS, Sehouli J, Trope CG, Ayhan A, et al. Secondary cytoreductive surgery based on an international cohort: redefining a new standard of care for patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer. In: 13th Biennial Meeting International Gynecologic Cancer Society; Prague; October 23–26, 2010. [abstract 103]. Zang RY, Harter P, Chi DS, Sehouli J, Trope CG, Ayhan A, et al. Secondary cytoreductive surgery based on an international cohort: redefining a new standard of care for patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer. In: 13th Biennial Meeting International Gynecologic Cancer Society; Prague; October 23–26, 2010. [abstract 103].
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Glehen O, Osinsky D, Cotte E, Kwiatowski F, Freyer G, Isaac S, et al. Intraperitoneal chemohyperthermia using a closed abdominal procedure and cytoreductive surgery for the treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis: morbidity and mortality analysis of 216 consecutive procedures. Ann Surg Oncol. 2003;10:863–9.PubMedCrossRef Glehen O, Osinsky D, Cotte E, Kwiatowski F, Freyer G, Isaac S, et al. Intraperitoneal chemohyperthermia using a closed abdominal procedure and cytoreductive surgery for the treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis: morbidity and mortality analysis of 216 consecutive procedures. Ann Surg Oncol. 2003;10:863–9.PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Schisterman EF, Perkins NJ, Aiyi L, Bondell H. Optimal cut-point and its corresponding Youden Index to discriminate individuals using pooled blood samples. Epidemiology. 2005,16:73–81.PubMedCrossRef Schisterman EF, Perkins NJ, Aiyi L, Bondell H. Optimal cut-point and its corresponding Youden Index to discriminate individuals using pooled blood samples. Epidemiology. 2005,16:73–81.PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Chmura Kraemer H. Evaluating medical tests: objective and quantitative guidelines. Newbury Park: SAGE; 1992. Chmura Kraemer H. Evaluating medical tests: objective and quantitative guidelines. Newbury Park: SAGE; 1992.
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Rubin DB. Multiple imputation for nonresponse in surveys. New York: Wiley; 1987.CrossRef Rubin DB. Multiple imputation for nonresponse in surveys. New York: Wiley; 1987.CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Graham JW. Missing data analysis: making it work in the real world. Ann Rev Psychol. 2009;60:549–76.CrossRef Graham JW. Missing data analysis: making it work in the real world. Ann Rev Psychol. 2009;60:549–76.CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Klebanoff MA, Cole SR. Use of multiple imputation in the epidemiologic literature. Am J Epidemiol. 2008;168:355–7.PubMedCrossRef Klebanoff MA, Cole SR. Use of multiple imputation in the epidemiologic literature. Am J Epidemiol. 2008;168:355–7.PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat He Y, Zaslavsky AM, Harrington DP, Catalano P, Landrum MB. Multiple imputation in a large-scale complex survey: a practical guide. Stat Methods Med Res. 2010;19:653–70.PubMedCrossRef He Y, Zaslavsky AM, Harrington DP, Catalano P, Landrum MB. Multiple imputation in a large-scale complex survey: a practical guide. Stat Methods Med Res. 2010;19:653–70.PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Gönen M. Analyzing receiver operating characteristic curves with SAS. Cary: SAS Press; 2007. Gönen M. Analyzing receiver operating characteristic curves with SAS. Cary: SAS Press; 2007.
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Sehouli J, Richter R, Braicu EI, Bühling KJ, Bahra M, Neuhaus P. Role of secondary cytoreductive surgery in ovarian cancer relapse: who will benefit? A systematic analysis of 240 consecutive patients. J Surg Oncol. 2011;29:242–8. Sehouli J, Richter R, Braicu EI, Bühling KJ, Bahra M, Neuhaus P. Role of secondary cytoreductive surgery in ovarian cancer relapse: who will benefit? A systematic analysis of 240 consecutive patients. J Surg Oncol. 2011;29:242–8.
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Tanner EJ, Chi DS, Eisenhauer EL, Diaz-Montes TP, Santillan A, Bristow RE. Surveillance for the detection of recurrent ovarian cancer: survival impact or lead-time bias? Gynecol Oncol. 2010;117:336–40.PubMedCrossRef Tanner EJ, Chi DS, Eisenhauer EL, Diaz-Montes TP, Santillan A, Bristow RE. Surveillance for the detection of recurrent ovarian cancer: survival impact or lead-time bias? Gynecol Oncol. 2010;117:336–40.PubMedCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Tian WJ, Jiang R, Cheng X, Tang J, Xing Y, Zang RY. Surgery in recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer: benefits on Survival for patients with residual disease of 0.1–1 cm after secondary cytoreduction. J Surg Oncol. 2010;101:244–50.PubMed Tian WJ, Jiang R, Cheng X, Tang J, Xing Y, Zang RY. Surgery in recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer: benefits on Survival for patients with residual disease of 0.1–1 cm after secondary cytoreduction. J Surg Oncol. 2010;101:244–50.PubMed
Metadaten
Titel
A Risk Model for Secondary Cytoreductive Surgery in Recurrent Ovarian Cancer: An Evidence-Based Proposal for Patient Selection
verfasst von
Wen-Juan Tian, MD
Dennis S. Chi, MD
Jalid Sehouli, MD, PhD
Claes G. Tropé, MD, PhD
Rong Jiang, MD
Ali Ayhan, MD
Gennaro Cormio, MD, PhD
Yan Xing, MD, PhD, MSc
Georg-Peter Breitbach, MD, PhD
Elena Ioana Braicu, MD
Catherine A. Rabbitt, MMS
Halldis Oksefjell, MD, PhD
Christina Fotopoulou, MD, PhD
Hans-Gerd Meerpohl, MD, PhD
Andreas du Bois, MD, PhD
Jonathan S. Berek, MD, MMS
Rong-Yu Zang, MD, PhD
Philipp Harter, MD, PhD
Publikationsdatum
01.02.2012
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Ausgabe 2/2012
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Elektronische ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-011-1873-2

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2012

Annals of Surgical Oncology 2/2012 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.