Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 2/2012

01.02.2012 | Breast Oncology

Do Reexcisions Impair Aesthetic Outcome in Breast Conservation Surgery? Exploratory Analysis of a Prospective Cohort Study

verfasst von: Joerg Heil, MD, Kathrin Breitkreuz, Michael Golatta, MD, Elena Czink, Julia Dahlkamp, Joachim Rom, MD, Florian Schuetz, MD, Maria Blumenstein, MD, Geraldine Rauch, PhD, Christof Sohn, MD

Erschienen in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Ausgabe 2/2012

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

Reexcision is a clinically relevant aspect of oncological breast conservation surgery. The influence of reexcision on aesthetic outcome is described differently in the literature. Our aim was to analyze this question in a well-defined cohort with standardized study instruments.

Methods

A total of 439 patients from a prospectively followed cohort were included in this analysis. Aesthetic results were assessed by the Breast Cancer Treatment Outcome Scale (BCTOS) aesthetic status. Dates of assessments were shortly after surgical interventions and before surgery. Group comparison was performed between patients with reexcisions (80 cases; 18%) and patients without reexcision (359 cases; 82%). We considered variables of differing distribution between the two groups that could hypothetically influence BCTOS aesthetic status in a nonparametric analysis of covariance (ANCOVA).

Results

The aesthetic status of patients with reexcisions was found to be significantly worse than for patients with a single breast conservation surgery (P < 0.0001) when tested by a nonparametric ANCOVA model. Because patients with reexcisions had more noninvasive tumors (25% vs. 8%, P = 0.0001) and tumors were larger in patients with reexcision (P = 0.01), we included these variables as possible covariates in the multivariate model. The model was adjusted for the BCTOS aesthetic status before and shortly after the first surgery.

Conclusions

Our findings suggest that reexcision in breast conservation surgery impairs aesthetic outcome, at least when assessed shortly after surgery.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Clarke M, Collins R, Darby S, et al. Effects of radiotherapy and of differences in the extent of surgery for early breast cancer on local recurrence and 15-year survival: an overview of the randomised trials. Lancet. 2005;366(9503):2087–106.PubMed Clarke M, Collins R, Darby S, et al. Effects of radiotherapy and of differences in the extent of surgery for early breast cancer on local recurrence and 15-year survival: an overview of the randomised trials. Lancet. 2005;366(9503):2087–106.PubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Fisher B, Anderson S, Bryant J, et al. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:1233–41.PubMedCrossRef Fisher B, Anderson S, Bryant J, et al. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:1233–41.PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat van Dongen JA, Voogd AC, Fentiman IS, et al. Long-term results of a randomized trial comparing breast-conserving therapy with mastectomy: European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer 10801 trial. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000;92:1143–50.PubMedCrossRef van Dongen JA, Voogd AC, Fentiman IS, et al. Long-term results of a randomized trial comparing breast-conserving therapy with mastectomy: European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer 10801 trial. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000;92:1143–50.PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Kreike B, Hart AA, van de Velde T, et al. Continuing risk of ipsilateral breast relapse after breast-conserving therapy at long-term follow-up. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008;71:1014–21.PubMedCrossRef Kreike B, Hart AA, van de Velde T, et al. Continuing risk of ipsilateral breast relapse after breast-conserving therapy at long-term follow-up. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008;71:1014–21.PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Mannell A. Breast-conserving therapy in breast cancer patients—a 12-year experience. S Afr J Surg. 2005;43:28–30.PubMed Mannell A. Breast-conserving therapy in breast cancer patients—a 12-year experience. S Afr J Surg. 2005;43:28–30.PubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Aziz D, Rawlinson E, Narod SA, et al. The role of reexcision for positive margins in optimizing local disease control after breast-conserving surgery for cancer. Breast J. 2006;12:331–7.PubMedCrossRef Aziz D, Rawlinson E, Narod SA, et al. The role of reexcision for positive margins in optimizing local disease control after breast-conserving surgery for cancer. Breast J. 2006;12:331–7.PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Cabioglu N, Hunt KK, Sahin AA, et al. Role for intraoperative margin assessment in patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery. Ann Surg Oncol. 2007;14:1458–71.PubMedCrossRef Cabioglu N, Hunt KK, Sahin AA, et al. Role for intraoperative margin assessment in patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery. Ann Surg Oncol. 2007;14:1458–71.PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Chagpar AB, Martin RC 2nd, Hagendoorn LJ, Chao C, McMasters KM. Lumpectomy margins are affected by tumor size and histologic subtype but not by biopsy technique. Am J Surg. 2004;188:399–402.PubMedCrossRef Chagpar AB, Martin RC 2nd, Hagendoorn LJ, Chao C, McMasters KM. Lumpectomy margins are affected by tumor size and histologic subtype but not by biopsy technique. Am J Surg. 2004;188:399–402.PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Dillon MF, Hill AD, Quinn CM, McDermott EW, O’Higgins N. A pathologic assessment of adequate margin status in breast-conserving therapy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2006;13:333–9.PubMedCrossRef Dillon MF, Hill AD, Quinn CM, McDermott EW, O’Higgins N. A pathologic assessment of adequate margin status in breast-conserving therapy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2006;13:333–9.PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Kurniawan ED, Wong MH, Windle I, et al. Predictors of surgical margin status in breast-conserving surgery within a breast screening program. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15:2542–9.PubMedCrossRef Kurniawan ED, Wong MH, Windle I, et al. Predictors of surgical margin status in breast-conserving surgery within a breast screening program. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15:2542–9.PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Smitt MC, Horst K. Association of clinical and pathologic variables with lumpectomy surgical margin status after preoperative diagnosis or excisional biopsy of invasive breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2007;14:1040–4.PubMedCrossRef Smitt MC, Horst K. Association of clinical and pathologic variables with lumpectomy surgical margin status after preoperative diagnosis or excisional biopsy of invasive breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2007;14:1040–4.PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Margolis GJ, Goodman RL. Psychological factors in women choosing radiation therapy for breast cancer. Psychosomatics. 1984;25:464–6, 469. Margolis GJ, Goodman RL. Psychological factors in women choosing radiation therapy for breast cancer. Psychosomatics. 1984;25:464–6, 469.
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Curran D, van Dongen JP, Aaronson NK, et al. Quality of life of early-stage breast cancer patients treated with radical mastectomy or breast-conserving procedures: results of EORTC Trial 10801. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC), Breast Cancer Co-operative Group (BCCG). Eur J Cancer. 1998;34:307–14.PubMedCrossRef Curran D, van Dongen JP, Aaronson NK, et al. Quality of life of early-stage breast cancer patients treated with radical mastectomy or breast-conserving procedures: results of EORTC Trial 10801. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC), Breast Cancer Co-operative Group (BCCG). Eur J Cancer. 1998;34:307–14.PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Kiebert GM, de Haes JC, van de Velde CJ. The impact of breast-conserving treatment and mastectomy on the quality of life of early-stage breast cancer patients: a review. J Clin Oncol. 1991;9:1059–70.PubMed Kiebert GM, de Haes JC, van de Velde CJ. The impact of breast-conserving treatment and mastectomy on the quality of life of early-stage breast cancer patients: a review. J Clin Oncol. 1991;9:1059–70.PubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Nano MT, Gill PG, Kollias J, Bochner MA, Malycha P, Winefield HR. Psychological impact and cosmetic outcome of surgical breast cancer strategies. ANZ J Surg. 2005;75:940–7.PubMedCrossRef Nano MT, Gill PG, Kollias J, Bochner MA, Malycha P, Winefield HR. Psychological impact and cosmetic outcome of surgical breast cancer strategies. ANZ J Surg. 2005;75:940–7.PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Noguchi M, Saito Y, Nishijima H, et al. The psychological and cosmetic aspects of breast conserving therapy compared with radical mastectomy. Surg Today. 1993;23:598–602.PubMedCrossRef Noguchi M, Saito Y, Nishijima H, et al. The psychological and cosmetic aspects of breast conserving therapy compared with radical mastectomy. Surg Today. 1993;23:598–602.PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Wang HT, Barone CM, Steigelman MB, et al. Aesthetic outcomes in breast conservation therapy. Aesthet Surg J. 2008;28:165–70.PubMedCrossRef Wang HT, Barone CM, Steigelman MB, et al. Aesthetic outcomes in breast conservation therapy. Aesthet Surg J. 2008;28:165–70.PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Heil J, Holl S, Golatta M, et al. Aesthetic and functional results after breast conserving surgery as correlates of quality of life measured by a German version of the Breast Cancer Treatment Outcome Scale (BCTOS). Breast. 2010;19:470–4.PubMedCrossRef Heil J, Holl S, Golatta M, et al. Aesthetic and functional results after breast conserving surgery as correlates of quality of life measured by a German version of the Breast Cancer Treatment Outcome Scale (BCTOS). Breast. 2010;19:470–4.PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Heil J, Czink E, Golatta M, et al. Change of aesthetic and functional outcome over time and their relationship to quality of life after breast conserving therapy. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2011;37:116–21.PubMedCrossRef Heil J, Czink E, Golatta M, et al. Change of aesthetic and functional outcome over time and their relationship to quality of life after breast conserving therapy. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2011;37:116–21.PubMedCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Wazer DE, DiPetrillo T, Schmidt-Ullrich R, et al. Factors influencing cosmetic outcome and complication risk after conservative surgery and radiotherapy for early-stage breast carcinoma. J Clin Oncol. 1992;10:356–63.PubMed Wazer DE, DiPetrillo T, Schmidt-Ullrich R, et al. Factors influencing cosmetic outcome and complication risk after conservative surgery and radiotherapy for early-stage breast carcinoma. J Clin Oncol. 1992;10:356–63.PubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Fedorcik GG, Sachs R, Goldfarb MA. Oncologic and aesthetic results following breast-conserving therapy with 0.5 cm margins in 100 consecutive patients. Breast J. 2006;12:208–11.PubMedCrossRef Fedorcik GG, Sachs R, Goldfarb MA. Oncologic and aesthetic results following breast-conserving therapy with 0.5 cm margins in 100 consecutive patients. Breast J. 2006;12:208–11.PubMedCrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Waljee JF, Hu ES, Newman LA, Alderman AK. Predictors of breast asymmetry after breast-conserving operation for breast cancer. J Am Coll Surg. 2008;206:274–80.PubMedCrossRef Waljee JF, Hu ES, Newman LA, Alderman AK. Predictors of breast asymmetry after breast-conserving operation for breast cancer. J Am Coll Surg. 2008;206:274–80.PubMedCrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Cochrane RA, Valasiadou P, Wilson AR, Al-Ghazal SK, Macmillan RD. Cosmesis and satisfaction after breast-conserving surgery correlates with the percentage of breast volume excised. Br J Surg. 2003;90:1505–9.PubMedCrossRef Cochrane RA, Valasiadou P, Wilson AR, Al-Ghazal SK, Macmillan RD. Cosmesis and satisfaction after breast-conserving surgery correlates with the percentage of breast volume excised. Br J Surg. 2003;90:1505–9.PubMedCrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Heil J, Dahlkamp J, Golatta M, et al. Aesthetics in breast conserving therapy: do objectively measured results match patients’ evaluations? Ann Surg Oncol. 2011;18:134–8.PubMedCrossRef Heil J, Dahlkamp J, Golatta M, et al. Aesthetics in breast conserving therapy: do objectively measured results match patients’ evaluations? Ann Surg Oncol. 2011;18:134–8.PubMedCrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Al-Ghazal SK, Fallowfield L, Blamey RW. Patient evaluation of cosmetic outcome after conserving surgery for treatment of primary breast cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol. 1999;25:344–6.PubMedCrossRef Al-Ghazal SK, Fallowfield L, Blamey RW. Patient evaluation of cosmetic outcome after conserving surgery for treatment of primary breast cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol. 1999;25:344–6.PubMedCrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Al-Ghazal SK, Blamey RW. Cosmetic assessment of breast-conserving surgery for primary breast cancer. Breast. 1999;8:162–8.PubMedCrossRef Al-Ghazal SK, Blamey RW. Cosmetic assessment of breast-conserving surgery for primary breast cancer. Breast. 1999;8:162–8.PubMedCrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Stanton AL, Krishnan L, Collins CA. Form or function? Part 1. Subjective cosmetic and functional correlates of quality of life in women treated with breast-conserving surgical procedures and radiotherapy. Cancer. 2001;91:2273–81. Stanton AL, Krishnan L, Collins CA. Form or function? Part 1. Subjective cosmetic and functional correlates of quality of life in women treated with breast-conserving surgical procedures and radiotherapy. Cancer. 2001;91:2273–81.
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Knoke JD. Nonparametric analysis of covariance for comparing change in randomized studies with baseline values subject to error. Biometrics. 1991;47:523–33.PubMedCrossRef Knoke JD. Nonparametric analysis of covariance for comparing change in randomized studies with baseline values subject to error. Biometrics. 1991;47:523–33.PubMedCrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Cardoso MJ, Cardoso J, Santos AC, et al. Factors determining esthetic outcome after breast cancer conservative treatment. Breast J. 2007;13:140–6.PubMedCrossRef Cardoso MJ, Cardoso J, Santos AC, et al. Factors determining esthetic outcome after breast cancer conservative treatment. Breast J. 2007;13:140–6.PubMedCrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Al-Ghazal SK, Blamey RW, Stewart J, Morgan AA. The cosmetic outcome in early breast cancer treated with breast conservation. Eur J Surg Oncol. 1999;25:566–70.PubMedCrossRef Al-Ghazal SK, Blamey RW, Stewart J, Morgan AA. The cosmetic outcome in early breast cancer treated with breast conservation. Eur J Surg Oncol. 1999;25:566–70.PubMedCrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Lindsey I, Serpell JW, Johnson WR, Rodger A. Cosmesis following complete local excision of breast cancer. Aust N Z J Surg. 1997;67:428–32.PubMedCrossRef Lindsey I, Serpell JW, Johnson WR, Rodger A. Cosmesis following complete local excision of breast cancer. Aust N Z J Surg. 1997;67:428–32.PubMedCrossRef
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Taylor ME, Perez CA, Halverson KJ, et al. Factors influencing cosmetic results after conservation therapy for breast cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1995;31:753–64.PubMedCrossRef Taylor ME, Perez CA, Halverson KJ, et al. Factors influencing cosmetic results after conservation therapy for breast cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1995;31:753–64.PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Do Reexcisions Impair Aesthetic Outcome in Breast Conservation Surgery? Exploratory Analysis of a Prospective Cohort Study
verfasst von
Joerg Heil, MD
Kathrin Breitkreuz
Michael Golatta, MD
Elena Czink
Julia Dahlkamp
Joachim Rom, MD
Florian Schuetz, MD
Maria Blumenstein, MD
Geraldine Rauch, PhD
Christof Sohn, MD
Publikationsdatum
01.02.2012
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Ausgabe 2/2012
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Elektronische ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-011-1947-1

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2012

Annals of Surgical Oncology 2/2012 Zur Ausgabe

Healthcare Policy and Outcomes

Ethical Considerations in Clinical Research

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

CME: 2 Punkte

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht, PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske Das Webinar S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“ beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.