Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 11/2011

01.10.2011 | American Society of Breast Surgeons

Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy for Breast Cancer and Risk-Reducing Surgery: The Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center Experience

verfasst von: Paulo de Alcantara Filho, MD, Deborah Capko, MD, John Mitchel Barry, MD, Monica Morrow, MD, Andrea Pusic, MD, Virgilio S. Sacchini, MD

Erschienen in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Ausgabe 11/2011

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) has been gathering increased recognition as an alternative to more traditional mastectomy approaches. Initially, questions concerning its oncologic safety limited the use of NSM. Nevertheless, mounting evidence supporting the practice of NSM for both prophylactic and oncologic purposes is leading to its more widespread use and broadened indications.

Methods

Using a prospectively maintained database, we reviewed our experience of 353 NSM procedures performed in 200 patients over the past 10 years.

Results

The indications for surgery were: 196 prophylactic risk-reduction (55.5%), 74 ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) (20.8%), 82 invasive cancer (23.2%), and 1 phyllodes tumor (0.5%). The nipple areolar complex (NAC) was entirely preserved in 341 mastectomies (96.7%). There were 11 patients (3.1%) who were found to have cancer at the nipple margin, warranting further excision. A total of 69 breasts (19.5%) had some degree of skin desquamation or necrosis, but only 12 (3.3%) required operative debridement, of which 3 breasts (1%) necessitated removal of a breast implant. Also, 6 patients (2%) were treated for infection. Of the 196 prophylactic NSMs, 11 specimens (5.6%) were found to harbor occult cancer (8 DCIS and 3 invasive cancers). One patient who underwent NSM for invasive ductal carcinoma in 2006 developed metastatic disease to her brain. No other recurrences are attributable to the 353 NSMs.

Conclusions

The trends demonstrate the increasing acceptance of NSM as a prophylactic procedure as well as for therapeutic purposes. Although NSM is not standard, our experience supports the selective use of NSM in both prophylactic and malignant settings.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Eldor L, Spiegel A. Breast reconstruction after bilateral prophylactic mastectomy in women at high risk for breast cancer. Breast J. 2009;15:S81–9.PubMedCrossRef Eldor L, Spiegel A. Breast reconstruction after bilateral prophylactic mastectomy in women at high risk for breast cancer. Breast J. 2009;15:S81–9.PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Lostumbo L, Carbine NE, Wallace J. Prophylactic mastectomy for the prevention of breast cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;(11):CD002748. Lostumbo L, Carbine NE, Wallace J. Prophylactic mastectomy for the prevention of breast cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;(11):CD002748.
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Morrow M, Mehrara B. Prophylactic mastectomy and the timing of breast reconstruction. Br J Surg. 2009;96:1–2.PubMedCrossRef Morrow M, Mehrara B. Prophylactic mastectomy and the timing of breast reconstruction. Br J Surg. 2009;96:1–2.PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Cucin RL, Guthrie RH, Jr, Luterman A, Shires GT, Goulian D, Jr. Transplantation of the cryopreserved nipple-areolar complex. Ann Plast Surg. 1980;4:391–5.PubMedCrossRef Cucin RL, Guthrie RH, Jr, Luterman A, Shires GT, Goulian D, Jr. Transplantation of the cryopreserved nipple-areolar complex. Ann Plast Surg. 1980;4:391–5.PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Rose JH, Jr. Carcinoma in a transplanted nipple. Arch Surg. 1980;115:1131–2.PubMed Rose JH, Jr. Carcinoma in a transplanted nipple. Arch Surg. 1980;115:1131–2.PubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Freeman BS. Subcutaneous mastectomy for benign breast lesions with immediate or delayed prosthetic replacement. Plast Reconstr Surg Transplant Bull. 1962;30:676–82.PubMedCrossRef Freeman BS. Subcutaneous mastectomy for benign breast lesions with immediate or delayed prosthetic replacement. Plast Reconstr Surg Transplant Bull. 1962;30:676–82.PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Freeman BS. Complications of subcutaneous mastectomy with prosthetic replacement, immediate or delayed. South Med J. 1967;60:1277–80.PubMedCrossRef Freeman BS. Complications of subcutaneous mastectomy with prosthetic replacement, immediate or delayed. South Med J. 1967;60:1277–80.PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Voltura AM, Tsangaris TN, Rosson GD, Jacobs LK, Flores JI, Singh NK, et al. Nipple-sparing mastectomy: critical assessment of 51 procedures and implications for selection criteria. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15:3396–401.PubMedCrossRef Voltura AM, Tsangaris TN, Rosson GD, Jacobs LK, Flores JI, Singh NK, et al. Nipple-sparing mastectomy: critical assessment of 51 procedures and implications for selection criteria. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15:3396–401.PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Garcia-Etienne CA, Cody HS, III, Disa JJ, Cordeiro P, Sacchini V. Nipple-sparing mastectomy: initial experience at the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center and a comprehensive review of literature. Breast J. 2009;15:440–9.PubMedCrossRef Garcia-Etienne CA, Cody HS, III, Disa JJ, Cordeiro P, Sacchini V. Nipple-sparing mastectomy: initial experience at the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center and a comprehensive review of literature. Breast J. 2009;15:440–9.PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Edge SB. Nipple-sparing mastectomy: how often is the nipple involved? J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:4930–2.PubMedCrossRef Edge SB. Nipple-sparing mastectomy: how often is the nipple involved? J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:4930–2.PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Crowe JP, Patrick RJ, Yetman RJ, Djohan R. Nipple-sparing mastectomy update: one hundred forty-nine procedures and clinical outcomes. Arch Surg. 2008;143:1106–10; discussion 10.PubMedCrossRef Crowe JP, Patrick RJ, Yetman RJ, Djohan R. Nipple-sparing mastectomy update: one hundred forty-nine procedures and clinical outcomes. Arch Surg. 2008;143:1106–10; discussion 10.PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Petit JY, Veronesi U, Orecchia R, Rey P, Martella S, Didier F, et al. Nipple sparing mastectomy with nipple areola intraoperative radiotherapy: one thousand and one cases of a five years experience at the European institute of oncology of Milan (EIO). Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2009;117:333–8.PubMedCrossRef Petit JY, Veronesi U, Orecchia R, Rey P, Martella S, Didier F, et al. Nipple sparing mastectomy with nipple areola intraoperative radiotherapy: one thousand and one cases of a five years experience at the European institute of oncology of Milan (EIO). Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2009;117:333–8.PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Gerber B, Krause A, Dieterich M, Reimer T, Kundt G. The oncological safety of skin sparing mastectomy with conservation of the nipple-areola complex and autologous reconstruction: an extended follow-up study. Ann Surg. 2009;249:461–8.PubMedCrossRef Gerber B, Krause A, Dieterich M, Reimer T, Kundt G. The oncological safety of skin sparing mastectomy with conservation of the nipple-areola complex and autologous reconstruction: an extended follow-up study. Ann Surg. 2009;249:461–8.PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Sacchini V, Pinotti JA, Barros AC, Luini A, Pluchinotta A, Pinotti M, et al. Nipple-sparing mastectomy for breast cancer and risk reduction: oncologic or technical problem? J Am Coll Surg. 2006;203:704–14.PubMedCrossRef Sacchini V, Pinotti JA, Barros AC, Luini A, Pluchinotta A, Pinotti M, et al. Nipple-sparing mastectomy for breast cancer and risk reduction: oncologic or technical problem? J Am Coll Surg. 2006;203:704–14.PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Brachtel EF, Rusby JE, Michaelson JS, Chen LL, Muzikansky A, Smith BL, et al. Occult nipple involvement in breast cancer: clinicopathologic findings in 316 consecutive mastectomy specimens. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:4948–54.PubMedCrossRef Brachtel EF, Rusby JE, Michaelson JS, Chen LL, Muzikansky A, Smith BL, et al. Occult nipple involvement in breast cancer: clinicopathologic findings in 316 consecutive mastectomy specimens. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:4948–54.PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Laronga C, Kemp B, Johnston D, Robb GL, Singletary SE. The incidence of occult nipple–areola complex involvement in breast cancer patients receiving a skin-sparing mastectomy. Ann Surg Oncol. 1999;6:609–13.PubMedCrossRef Laronga C, Kemp B, Johnston D, Robb GL, Singletary SE. The incidence of occult nipple–areola complex involvement in breast cancer patients receiving a skin-sparing mastectomy. Ann Surg Oncol. 1999;6:609–13.PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Verma GR, Kumar A, Joshi K. Nipple involvement in peripheral breast carcinoma: a prospective study. Indian J Cancer. 1997;34:1–5.PubMed Verma GR, Kumar A, Joshi K. Nipple involvement in peripheral breast carcinoma: a prospective study. Indian J Cancer. 1997;34:1–5.PubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Lagios MD, Gates EA, Westdahl PR, Richards V, Alpert BS. A guide to the frequency of nipple involvement in breast cancer. A study of 149 consecutive mastectomies using a serial subgross and correlated radiographic technique. Am J Surg. 1979;138:135–42.PubMedCrossRef Lagios MD, Gates EA, Westdahl PR, Richards V, Alpert BS. A guide to the frequency of nipple involvement in breast cancer. A study of 149 consecutive mastectomies using a serial subgross and correlated radiographic technique. Am J Surg. 1979;138:135–42.PubMedCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Menon RS, van Geel AN. Cancer of the breast with nipple involvement. Br J Cancer. 1989;59:81–4.PubMedCrossRef Menon RS, van Geel AN. Cancer of the breast with nipple involvement. Br J Cancer. 1989;59:81–4.PubMedCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Gulben K, Yildirim E, Berberoglu U. Prediction of occult nipple-areola complex involvement in breast cancer patients. Neoplasma. 2009;56:72–5.PubMedCrossRef Gulben K, Yildirim E, Berberoglu U. Prediction of occult nipple-areola complex involvement in breast cancer patients. Neoplasma. 2009;56:72–5.PubMedCrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Tuttle TM, Habermann EB, Grund EH, Morris TJ, Virnig BA. Increasing use of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy for breast cancer patients: a trend toward more aggressive surgical treatment. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:5203–9.PubMedCrossRef Tuttle TM, Habermann EB, Grund EH, Morris TJ, Virnig BA. Increasing use of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy for breast cancer patients: a trend toward more aggressive surgical treatment. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:5203–9.PubMedCrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Hartmann LC, Schaid DJ, Woods JE, Crotty TP, Myers JL, Arnold PG, et al. Efficacy of bilateral prophylactic mastectomy in women with a family history of breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 1999;340:77–84.PubMedCrossRef Hartmann LC, Schaid DJ, Woods JE, Crotty TP, Myers JL, Arnold PG, et al. Efficacy of bilateral prophylactic mastectomy in women with a family history of breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 1999;340:77–84.PubMedCrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Mislowsky A, Domchek S, Stroede C, Bergey MR, Sonnad SS, Wu L, et al. Breast cancer surgery trend changes since the introduction of BRCA1/2 mutation screening: a retrospective cohort analysis of 158 mutation carriers treated at a single institution. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011;18:745–51.PubMedCrossRef Mislowsky A, Domchek S, Stroede C, Bergey MR, Sonnad SS, Wu L, et al. Breast cancer surgery trend changes since the introduction of BRCA1/2 mutation screening: a retrospective cohort analysis of 158 mutation carriers treated at a single institution. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011;18:745–51.PubMedCrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Morimoto T, Komaki K, Inui K, Umemoto A, Yamamoto H, Harada K, et al. Involvement of nipple and areola in early breast cancer. Cancer. 1985;55:2459–63.PubMedCrossRef Morimoto T, Komaki K, Inui K, Umemoto A, Yamamoto H, Harada K, et al. Involvement of nipple and areola in early breast cancer. Cancer. 1985;55:2459–63.PubMedCrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Luttges J, Kalbfleisch H, Prinz P. Nipple involvement and multicentricity in breast cancer. A study on whole organ sections. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 1987;113:481–7.PubMedCrossRef Luttges J, Kalbfleisch H, Prinz P. Nipple involvement and multicentricity in breast cancer. A study on whole organ sections. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 1987;113:481–7.PubMedCrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Santini D, Taffurelli M, Gelli MC, Grassigli A, Giosa F, Marrano D, et al. Neoplastic involvement of nipple-areolar complex in invasive breast cancer. Am J Surg. 1989;158:399–403.PubMedCrossRef Santini D, Taffurelli M, Gelli MC, Grassigli A, Giosa F, Marrano D, et al. Neoplastic involvement of nipple-areolar complex in invasive breast cancer. Am J Surg. 1989;158:399–403.PubMedCrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Vyas JJ, Chinoy RF, Vaidya JS. Prediction of nipple and areola involvement in breast cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol. 1998;24:15–6.PubMedCrossRef Vyas JJ, Chinoy RF, Vaidya JS. Prediction of nipple and areola involvement in breast cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol. 1998;24:15–6.PubMedCrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Benediktsson KP, Perbeck L. Survival in breast cancer after nipple-sparing subcutaneous mastectomy and immediate reconstruction with implants: a prospective trial with 13 years median follow-up in 216 patients. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2008;34:143–8.PubMedCrossRef Benediktsson KP, Perbeck L. Survival in breast cancer after nipple-sparing subcutaneous mastectomy and immediate reconstruction with implants: a prospective trial with 13 years median follow-up in 216 patients. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2008;34:143–8.PubMedCrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Petit JY, Veronesi U, Rey P, Rotmensz N, Botteri E, Rietjens M, et al. Nipple-sparing mastectomy: risk of nipple-areolar recurrences in a series of 579 cases. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2009;114:97–101.PubMedCrossRef Petit JY, Veronesi U, Rey P, Rotmensz N, Botteri E, Rietjens M, et al. Nipple-sparing mastectomy: risk of nipple-areolar recurrences in a series of 579 cases. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2009;114:97–101.PubMedCrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Didier F, Radice D, Gandini S, Bedolis R, Rotmensz N, Maldifassi A, et al. Does nipple preservation in mastectomy improve satisfaction with cosmetic results, psychological adjustment, body image and sexuality? Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2009;118:623–33.PubMedCrossRef Didier F, Radice D, Gandini S, Bedolis R, Rotmensz N, Maldifassi A, et al. Does nipple preservation in mastectomy improve satisfaction with cosmetic results, psychological adjustment, body image and sexuality? Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2009;118:623–33.PubMedCrossRef
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Nahabedian MY, Tsangaris TN. Breast reconstruction following subcutaneous mastectomy for cancer: a critical appraisal of the nipple-areola complex. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;117:1083–90.PubMedCrossRef Nahabedian MY, Tsangaris TN. Breast reconstruction following subcutaneous mastectomy for cancer: a critical appraisal of the nipple-areola complex. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;117:1083–90.PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy for Breast Cancer and Risk-Reducing Surgery: The Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center Experience
verfasst von
Paulo de Alcantara Filho, MD
Deborah Capko, MD
John Mitchel Barry, MD
Monica Morrow, MD
Andrea Pusic, MD
Virgilio S. Sacchini, MD
Publikationsdatum
01.10.2011
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Ausgabe 11/2011
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Elektronische ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-011-1974-y

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 11/2011

Annals of Surgical Oncology 11/2011 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.