Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 1/2013

01.01.2013 | Breast Oncology

Effect of ASCO/CAP Guidelines for Determining ER Status on Molecular Subtype

verfasst von: Brenda Deyarmin, HT(ASCP), Jennifer L. Kane, HT(ASCP), Allyson L. Valente, BS, Ryan van Laar, PhD, Christopher Gallagher, MD, Craig D. Shriver, MD, Rachel E. Ellsworth, PhD

Erschienen in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Ausgabe 1/2013

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Determination of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status is standard for predicting prognosis and determining treatment options for patients with breast cancer. In 2010, the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) and College of American Pathologists (CAP) issued guidelines that tumors with ≥1 % positively staining cells should be considered ER positive. Here, we determined how this cutoff relates to molecular subtype.

Methods

Clinicopathological characteristics were compared between ER-negative, ER-positive, and low-ER-staining (1–10 %) tumors using chi-square analysis with P < 0.05 defining statistical significance. Gene expression data were generated for 26 low-ER-staining tumors, and their intrinsic subtype determined. Immunohistochemistry (IHC)-defined surrogate subtypes, using the threshold of positivity defined by ASCO/CAP guidelines, were compared with molecular subtypes.

Results

Low-ER-staining tumors were clinicopathologically more similar to ER-negative than to ER-positive tumors; 88 % of low-staining tumors were basal like or HER2 enriched. Only those tumors expressing 10 % ER-positive cells were classified as luminal A subtype.

Conclusions

Under ASCO/CAP guidelines, tumors with 1–10 % ER staining would be classified as ER positive, yet most are basal like or HER2 enriched and have pathological features similar to ER-negative tumors. Clinical trials seeking to treat tumors of ER-negative basal-like and/or HER2-enriched subtypes should thus not preclude enrollment based solely on results of ER immunohistochemistry. As ER status is a critical element in the choice of treatments for patients with breast cancer, it is imperative that the most effective method for classifying tumors be developed.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Pietras RJ, Marquez-Garban DC. Membrane-associated estrogen receptor signaling pathways in human cancers. Clin Cancer Res. 2007;13:4672–6.PubMedCrossRef Pietras RJ, Marquez-Garban DC. Membrane-associated estrogen receptor signaling pathways in human cancers. Clin Cancer Res. 2007;13:4672–6.PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Aaltomaa S, Lipponen P, Eskelinen M, et al. Hormone receptors as prognostic factors in female breast cancer. Ann Med. 1991;23(6):643–8.PubMedCrossRef Aaltomaa S, Lipponen P, Eskelinen M, et al. Hormone receptors as prognostic factors in female breast cancer. Ann Med. 1991;23(6):643–8.PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Dunnwald LK, Rossing MA, Li CI. Hormone receptor status, tumor characteristics, and prognosis: a prospective cohort of breast cancer patients. Breast Cancer Res. 2007;9:R6.PubMedCrossRef Dunnwald LK, Rossing MA, Li CI. Hormone receptor status, tumor characteristics, and prognosis: a prospective cohort of breast cancer patients. Breast Cancer Res. 2007;9:R6.PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Early Breast Cancer Trialists’ Collaborative Group (EBCTCG). Tamoxifen for early breast cancer: an overview of the randomised trials. Lancet. 1998;351(9114):1451–67. Early Breast Cancer Trialists’ Collaborative Group (EBCTCG). Tamoxifen for early breast cancer: an overview of the randomised trials. Lancet. 1998;351(9114):1451–67.
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Regan MM, Viale G, Mastropasqua MG, et al. Re-evaluating adjuvant breast cancer trials: assessing hormone receptor status by immunohistochemical versus extraction assays. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2006;98(21):1571–81.PubMedCrossRef Regan MM, Viale G, Mastropasqua MG, et al. Re-evaluating adjuvant breast cancer trials: assessing hormone receptor status by immunohistochemical versus extraction assays. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2006;98(21):1571–81.PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Osborne CK. Steroid hormone receptors in breast cancer management. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 1998;51:227–38.PubMedCrossRef Osborne CK. Steroid hormone receptors in breast cancer management. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 1998;51:227–38.PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Engel KB, Moore HM. Effects of preanalytical variables on the detection of proteins by immunohistochemistry in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2011;135:537–43.PubMed Engel KB, Moore HM. Effects of preanalytical variables on the detection of proteins by immunohistochemistry in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2011;135:537–43.PubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Goldhirsch A, Glick JH, Gelber RD, et al. Meeting highlights: international expert consensus on the primary therapy of early breast cancer 2005. Ann Oncol. 2005;16(10):1569–83.PubMedCrossRef Goldhirsch A, Glick JH, Gelber RD, et al. Meeting highlights: international expert consensus on the primary therapy of early breast cancer 2005. Ann Oncol. 2005;16(10):1569–83.PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Hammond MEH, Hayes DF, Dowsett M, et al. American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guideline recommendations for immunohistochemical testing of estrogen and progesterone receptors in breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(16):2784–95.PubMedCrossRef Hammond MEH, Hayes DF, Dowsett M, et al. American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guideline recommendations for immunohistochemical testing of estrogen and progesterone receptors in breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(16):2784–95.PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat American Joint Committee on Cancer. AJCC Cancer Staging Manual, 7th ed. New York: Springer; 2010. American Joint Committee on Cancer. AJCC Cancer Staging Manual, 7th ed. New York: Springer; 2010.
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Bloom HJ, Richardson WW. Histological grading and prognosis in breast cancer. Br J Cancer. 1957;11:359–77.PubMedCrossRef Bloom HJ, Richardson WW. Histological grading and prognosis in breast cancer. Br J Cancer. 1957;11:359–77.PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Elston CW, Ellis IO. Pathological prognostic factors in breast cancer. I. The value of histological grade in breast cancer: experience from a large study with long-term follow up. Histopathology. 1991;19:403–10.PubMedCrossRef Elston CW, Ellis IO. Pathological prognostic factors in breast cancer. I. The value of histological grade in breast cancer: experience from a large study with long-term follow up. Histopathology. 1991;19:403–10.PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat van Laar R. Design and multiseries validation of a web-based gene expression assay for predicting breast cancer recurrence and patient survival. J Mol Diagn. 2011;13(3):297–304.PubMedCrossRef van Laar R. Design and multiseries validation of a web-based gene expression assay for predicting breast cancer recurrence and patient survival. J Mol Diagn. 2011;13(3):297–304.PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Sabatier R, Finetti P, Cervera N, et al. A gene expression signature identifies two prognostic subgroups of basal breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2011;126(2):407–20.PubMedCrossRef Sabatier R, Finetti P, Cervera N, et al. A gene expression signature identifies two prognostic subgroups of basal breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2011;126(2):407–20.PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Perou CM, Sorlie T, Eisen MB, et al. Molecular portraits of human breast tumours. Nature. 2000;406(6797):747–52.PubMedCrossRef Perou CM, Sorlie T, Eisen MB, et al. Molecular portraits of human breast tumours. Nature. 2000;406(6797):747–52.PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Sorlie T, Perou CM, Tibshirania R, et al. Gene expression patterns of breast carcinomas distinguish tumor subclasses with clinical implications. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2001;98(19):10869–74.PubMedCrossRef Sorlie T, Perou CM, Tibshirania R, et al. Gene expression patterns of breast carcinomas distinguish tumor subclasses with clinical implications. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2001;98(19):10869–74.PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Kennecke H, Yerushalmi R, Woods R, et al. Metastatic behavior of breast cancer subtypes. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(20):3271–7.PubMedCrossRef Kennecke H, Yerushalmi R, Woods R, et al. Metastatic behavior of breast cancer subtypes. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(20):3271–7.PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Raghav KPS, Hernandez-Aya LF, Lei X, et al. Impact of low estrogen/progesterone receptor expression on survival outcomes in breast cancers previously classified as triple negative breast cancers. Cancer. 2012;118(6):1498–506.PubMedCrossRef Raghav KPS, Hernandez-Aya LF, Lei X, et al. Impact of low estrogen/progesterone receptor expression on survival outcomes in breast cancers previously classified as triple negative breast cancers. Cancer. 2012;118(6):1498–506.PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Ashworth A. A synthetic lethal therapeutic approach: poly(ADP) ribose polymerase inhibitors for the treatment of cancers deficient in DNA double-strand break repair. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:3785–90.PubMedCrossRef Ashworth A. A synthetic lethal therapeutic approach: poly(ADP) ribose polymerase inhibitors for the treatment of cancers deficient in DNA double-strand break repair. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:3785–90.PubMedCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Fong PC, Boss DS, Yap TA, et al. Inhibition of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase in tumors from BRCA mutation carriers. N Engl J Med. 2009;361(2):123–34.PubMedCrossRef Fong PC, Boss DS, Yap TA, et al. Inhibition of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase in tumors from BRCA mutation carriers. N Engl J Med. 2009;361(2):123–34.PubMedCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat O’Shaughnessy J, Osborne C, Pippen JE, et al. Iniparib plus chemotherapy in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2011;364(3):205–14.PubMedCrossRef O’Shaughnessy J, Osborne C, Pippen JE, et al. Iniparib plus chemotherapy in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2011;364(3):205–14.PubMedCrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Tutt A, Robson M, Garber JE, et al. Oral poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor olaparib in patients with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations and advanced breast cancer: a proof-of-concept trial. Lancet. 2010;376(9737):235–44.PubMedCrossRef Tutt A, Robson M, Garber JE, et al. Oral poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor olaparib in patients with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations and advanced breast cancer: a proof-of-concept trial. Lancet. 2010;376(9737):235–44.PubMedCrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Gelmon KA, Tischkowitz M, Mackay H, et al. Olaparib in patients with recurrent high-grade serous or poorly differentiated ovarian carcinoma or triple-negative breast cancer: a phase 2, multicentre, open-label, non-randomised study. Lancet Oncol. 2011;12(9):852–61.PubMedCrossRef Gelmon KA, Tischkowitz M, Mackay H, et al. Olaparib in patients with recurrent high-grade serous or poorly differentiated ovarian carcinoma or triple-negative breast cancer: a phase 2, multicentre, open-label, non-randomised study. Lancet Oncol. 2011;12(9):852–61.PubMedCrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Paik S. Is gene array testing to be considered routine now? Breast. 2011;20(Suppl 3):S87–91.PubMedCrossRef Paik S. Is gene array testing to be considered routine now? Breast. 2011;20(Suppl 3):S87–91.PubMedCrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Ellis MJ, Ding L, Shen, D, et al. Whole-genome analysis informs breast cancer response to aromatase inhibitors. Nature. 2012; 486(7403):353–60.PubMed Ellis MJ, Ding L, Shen, D, et al. Whole-genome analysis informs breast cancer response to aromatase inhibitors. Nature. 2012; 486(7403):353–60.PubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Carey LA, Perou CM, Livasy CA, et al. Race, breast cancer subtypes, and survival in the Carolina Breast Cancer Study. JAMA. 2006; 295(21): 2492–502.PubMedCrossRef Carey LA, Perou CM, Livasy CA, et al. Race, breast cancer subtypes, and survival in the Carolina Breast Cancer Study. JAMA. 2006; 295(21): 2492–502.PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Effect of ASCO/CAP Guidelines for Determining ER Status on Molecular Subtype
verfasst von
Brenda Deyarmin, HT(ASCP)
Jennifer L. Kane, HT(ASCP)
Allyson L. Valente, BS
Ryan van Laar, PhD
Christopher Gallagher, MD
Craig D. Shriver, MD
Rachel E. Ellsworth, PhD
Publikationsdatum
01.01.2013
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Ausgabe 1/2013
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Elektronische ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-012-2588-8

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2013

Annals of Surgical Oncology 1/2013 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.