Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 1/2014

01.01.2014 | Breast Oncology

Lymph Node Counts and Ratio in Axillary Dissections Following Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer: A Better Alternative to Traditional pN Staging

verfasst von: Sheng Chen, MD, Yin Liu, MD, Liang Huang, MD, Can-Ming Chen, MD, Jiong Wu, MD, Zhi-Ming Shao, MD

Erschienen in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Ausgabe 1/2014

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) for breast cancer might change the number of involved and detected nodes in axillary lymph node dissections (ALND). In this study, we analyzed whether the number of dissected nodes and the lymph node ratio (LNR, defined as the proportion of involved nodes in dissected nodes) would have a better prognostic value than traditional pN staging.

Methods

A total of 569 patients with stage II, III breast cancer were included in this retrospective study. All patients underwent a median of three cycles of NCT followed by mastectomy and ALND. Clinical and pathological variables were investigated using univariate and multivariate survival analyses.

Results

In post-NCT node-negative (LN−) patients, those with 4–9 dissected nodes experienced a significantly lower relapse-free survival (RFS) compared with those with 10 or more dissected nodes (hazard ratio = 0.19, 0.41, for 10–19 nodes, 20+ nodes, respectively; 4–9 nodes as the reference; P = 0.002). In post-NCT node-positive (LN+) patients, a lower LNR was correlated with a better RFS on multivariate analysis, and pN staging failed to show independent prognostic significance when the LNR was included in the Cox regression model (hazard ratio = 4.2, 2.97, 2.24, and 1.68 for LNR 81–100, 61–80, 41–60; and 21–40 %, respectively; LNR 0–20 % as the reference. P < 0.001). In addition, there were significant differences in the estimated 5-year RFS for pN1 (P = 0.043) and pN3 patients (P = 0.03) among the different LNR subgroups.

Conclusions

Our study has provided new evidence that the number of dissected nodes (in LN− patients) and the LNR (in LN+ patients) might be a complementary or alternative method to traditional pN staging when evaluating disease after primary treatment.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Fisher B, Bryant J, Wolmark N, et al. Effect of preoperative chemotherapy on the outcome of women with operable breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 1998;16:2672–85.PubMed Fisher B, Bryant J, Wolmark N, et al. Effect of preoperative chemotherapy on the outcome of women with operable breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 1998;16:2672–85.PubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Kuerer HM, Newman LA, Smith TL, et al. Clinical course of breast cancer patients with complete pathologic primary tumor and axillary lymph node response to doxorubicin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol. 1999;17:460–9.PubMed Kuerer HM, Newman LA, Smith TL, et al. Clinical course of breast cancer patients with complete pathologic primary tumor and axillary lymph node response to doxorubicin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol. 1999;17:460–9.PubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Rastogi P, Anderson SJ, Bear HD, et al. Preoperative chemotherapy: updates of National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Protocols B-18 and B-27. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:778–85.PubMedCrossRef Rastogi P, Anderson SJ, Bear HD, et al. Preoperative chemotherapy: updates of National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Protocols B-18 and B-27. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:778–85.PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Guarneri V, Piacentini F, Ficarra G, et al. A prognostic model based on nodal status and Ki-67 predicts the risk of recurrence and death in breast cancer patients with residual disease after preoperative chemotherapy. Ann Oncol. 2009;20:1193–8.PubMedCrossRef Guarneri V, Piacentini F, Ficarra G, et al. A prognostic model based on nodal status and Ki-67 predicts the risk of recurrence and death in breast cancer patients with residual disease after preoperative chemotherapy. Ann Oncol. 2009;20:1193–8.PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Jones RL, Salter J, A’Hern R, et al. The prognostic significance of Ki67 before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2009;116:53–68.PubMedCrossRef Jones RL, Salter J, A’Hern R, et al. The prognostic significance of Ki67 before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2009;116:53–68.PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Colleoni M, Bagnardi V, Rotmensz N, et al. A risk score to predict disease-free survival in patients not achieving a pathological complete remission after preoperative chemotherapy for breast cancer. Ann Oncol. 2009;20:1178–84.PubMedCrossRef Colleoni M, Bagnardi V, Rotmensz N, et al. A risk score to predict disease-free survival in patients not achieving a pathological complete remission after preoperative chemotherapy for breast cancer. Ann Oncol. 2009;20:1178–84.PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Rouzier R, Pusztai L, Delaloge S, et al. Nomograms to predict pathologic complete response and metastasis-free survival after preoperative chemotherapy for breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:8331–9.PubMedCrossRef Rouzier R, Pusztai L, Delaloge S, et al. Nomograms to predict pathologic complete response and metastasis-free survival after preoperative chemotherapy for breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:8331–9.PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Symmans WF, Peintinger F, Hatzis C, et al. Measurement of residual breast cancer burden to predict survival after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:4414–22.PubMedCrossRef Symmans WF, Peintinger F, Hatzis C, et al. Measurement of residual breast cancer burden to predict survival after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:4414–22.PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Meric F, Mirza NQ, Buzdar AU, et al. Prognostic implications of pathological lymph node status after preoperative chemotherapy for operable T3N0M0 breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2000;7:435–40.PubMedCrossRef Meric F, Mirza NQ, Buzdar AU, et al. Prognostic implications of pathological lymph node status after preoperative chemotherapy for operable T3N0M0 breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2000;7:435–40.PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Truong PT, Berthelet E, Lee J, et al. The prognostic significance of the percentage of positive/dissected axillary lymph nodes in breast cancer recurrence and survival in patients with one to three positive axillary lymph nodes. Cancer. 2005;103:2006–14.PubMedCrossRef Truong PT, Berthelet E, Lee J, et al. The prognostic significance of the percentage of positive/dissected axillary lymph nodes in breast cancer recurrence and survival in patients with one to three positive axillary lymph nodes. Cancer. 2005;103:2006–14.PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Van Belle V, Van Calster B, Wildiers H, et al. Lymph node ratio better predicts disease-free survival in node-positive breast cancer than the number of positive lymph nodes. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:e150–1; author reply e152.PubMedCrossRef Van Belle V, Van Calster B, Wildiers H, et al. Lymph node ratio better predicts disease-free survival in node-positive breast cancer than the number of positive lymph nodes. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:e150–1; author reply e152.PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Vinh-Hung V, Verkooijen HM, Fioretta G, et al. Lymph node ratio as an alternative to pN staging in node-positive breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:1062–8.PubMedCrossRef Vinh-Hung V, Verkooijen HM, Fioretta G, et al. Lymph node ratio as an alternative to pN staging in node-positive breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:1062–8.PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Neuman H, Carey LA, Ollila DW, et al. Axillary lymph node count is lower after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Am J Surg. 2006;191:827–9.PubMedCrossRef Neuman H, Carey LA, Ollila DW, et al. Axillary lymph node count is lower after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Am J Surg. 2006;191:827–9.PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, et al. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer. 2009;45:228–47.PubMedCrossRef Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, et al. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer. 2009;45:228–47.PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Somner JE, Dixon JM, Thomas JS. Node retrieval in axillary lymph node dissections: recommendations for minimum numbers to be confident about node negative status. J Clin Pathol. 2004;57:845–8.PubMedCrossRef Somner JE, Dixon JM, Thomas JS. Node retrieval in axillary lymph node dissections: recommendations for minimum numbers to be confident about node negative status. J Clin Pathol. 2004;57:845–8.PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Belanger J, Soucy G, Sideris L, et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in invasive breast cancer results in a lower axillary lymph node count. J Am Coll Surg. 2008;206:704–8.PubMedCrossRef Belanger J, Soucy G, Sideris L, et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in invasive breast cancer results in a lower axillary lymph node count. J Am Coll Surg. 2008;206:704–8.PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim JY, Ryu MR, Choi BO, et al. The prognostic significance of the lymph node ratio in axillary lymph node positive breast cancer. J Breast Cancer. 2011;14:204–12.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Kim JY, Ryu MR, Choi BO, et al. The prognostic significance of the lymph node ratio in axillary lymph node positive breast cancer. J Breast Cancer. 2011;14:204–12.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Tausch C, Taucher S, Dubsky P, et al. Prognostic value of number of removed lymph nodes, number of involved lymph nodes, and lymph node ratio in 7502 breast cancer patients enrolled onto trials of the Austrian Breast and Colorectal Cancer Study Group (ABCSG). Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19:1808–17.PubMedCrossRef Tausch C, Taucher S, Dubsky P, et al. Prognostic value of number of removed lymph nodes, number of involved lymph nodes, and lymph node ratio in 7502 breast cancer patients enrolled onto trials of the Austrian Breast and Colorectal Cancer Study Group (ABCSG). Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19:1808–17.PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Wang F, He W, Qiu H, et al. Lymph node ratio and pN staging show different superiority as prognostic predictors depending on the number of lymph nodes dissected in Chinese patients with luminal A breast cancer. Clin Breast Cancer. 2012;12(6):404–11.PubMedCrossRef Wang F, He W, Qiu H, et al. Lymph node ratio and pN staging show different superiority as prognostic predictors depending on the number of lymph nodes dissected in Chinese patients with luminal A breast cancer. Clin Breast Cancer. 2012;12(6):404–11.PubMedCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Vinh-Hung V, Nguyen NP, Cserni G, et al. Prognostic value of nodal ratios in node-positive breast cancer: a compiled update. Future Oncol. 2009;5:1585–603.PubMedCrossRef Vinh-Hung V, Nguyen NP, Cserni G, et al. Prognostic value of nodal ratios in node-positive breast cancer: a compiled update. Future Oncol. 2009;5:1585–603.PubMedCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Woodward WA, Vinh-Hung V, Ueno NT, et al. Prognostic value of nodal ratios in node-positive breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:2910–6.PubMedCrossRef Woodward WA, Vinh-Hung V, Ueno NT, et al. Prognostic value of nodal ratios in node-positive breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:2910–6.PubMedCrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Keam B, Im SA, Kim HJ et al. Clinical significance of axillary nodal ratio in stage II/III breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2009;116:153–60.PubMedCrossRef Keam B, Im SA, Kim HJ et al. Clinical significance of axillary nodal ratio in stage II/III breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2009;116:153–60.PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Lymph Node Counts and Ratio in Axillary Dissections Following Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer: A Better Alternative to Traditional pN Staging
verfasst von
Sheng Chen, MD
Yin Liu, MD
Liang Huang, MD
Can-Ming Chen, MD
Jiong Wu, MD
Zhi-Ming Shao, MD
Publikationsdatum
01.01.2014
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Ausgabe 1/2014
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Elektronische ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-013-3245-6

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2014

Annals of Surgical Oncology 1/2014 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.