Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 6/2014

01.06.2014 | Healthcare Policy and Outcomes

Impact of Hepatectomy Surgical Complexity on Outcomes and Hospital Quality Rankings

verfasst von: Jennifer L. Paruch, MD, Ryan P. Merkow, MD, MS, David J. Bentrem, MD, Clifford Y. Ko, MD, MS, MSHS, Mitchell C. Posner, MD, Mark E. Cohen, PhD, Karl Y. Bilimoria, MD, MS, Sharon M. Weber, MD, MS

Erschienen in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Ausgabe 6/2014

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

There is substantial variation in the surgical complexity of hepatectomy. Currently, the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) risk adjusts for hospital quality comparisons using only the primary procedure code. Our objectives were to (1) assess the association between secondary procedures and complications; (2) assess model performance with inclusion of surgical complexity adjustment; and (3) examine whether secondary procedures affect hospital quality rankings.

Methods

Using ACS NSQIP (2007–2012), patients undergoing hepatectomy were identified. Secondary procedure codes and total work relative value units (RVUs) were used to approximate procedural complexity. The effect of procedural complexity variables on outcomes and hospital quality rankings were examined using hierarchical models.

Results

Among 11,826 patients who underwent hepatectomy at 261 hospitals, 32.8 % underwent at least one secondary procedure. Serious morbidity occurred in 18.0 % of patients. Seven of nine secondary procedures were significantly associated with death or serious morbidity on multivariable analysis. Model performance improved when secondary procedure categories were included, and secondary procedure categories outperformed total RVUs. The C-statistic for death or serious morbidity was 0.689 in the standard NSQIP model, 0.703 when total RVU was included, and 0.718 when secondary procedure categories were included. Of the 26 hospitals that were poor performers for death or serious morbidity using the standard ACS NSQIP model, three became average performers when secondary procedure categories were included in the model.

Conclusions

Secondary procedures are associated with an increased risk of postoperative complications. Inclusion of secondary procedure code categories in research and risk prediction models should be considered for hepatectomy.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Hall BL, Hamilton BH, Richards K, Bilimoria KY, Cohen ME, Ko CY. Does surgical quality improve in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program: an evaluation of all participating hospitals. Ann Surg. 2009;250(3):363–76.PubMed Hall BL, Hamilton BH, Richards K, Bilimoria KY, Cohen ME, Ko CY. Does surgical quality improve in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program: an evaluation of all participating hospitals. Ann Surg. 2009;250(3):363–76.PubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Cohen ME, Ko CY, Bilimoria KY, et al. Optimizing ACS NSQIP modeling for evaluation of surgical quality and risk: patient risk adjustment, procedure mix adjustment, shrinkage adjustment, and surgical focus. J Am Coll Surg. 2013;217(2):336–346.e1. Cohen ME, Ko CY, Bilimoria KY, et al. Optimizing ACS NSQIP modeling for evaluation of surgical quality and risk: patient risk adjustment, procedure mix adjustment, shrinkage adjustment, and surgical focus. J Am Coll Surg. 2013;217(2):336–346.e1.
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Belghiti J, Hiramatsu K, Benoist S, Massault P, Sauvanet A, Farges O. Seven hundred forty-seven hepatectomies in the 1990s: an update to evaluate the actual risk of liver resection. J Am Coll Surg. 2000;191(1):38–46.PubMedCrossRef Belghiti J, Hiramatsu K, Benoist S, Massault P, Sauvanet A, Farges O. Seven hundred forty-seven hepatectomies in the 1990s: an update to evaluate the actual risk of liver resection. J Am Coll Surg. 2000;191(1):38–46.PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Chua HK, Sondenaa K, Tsiotos GG, Larson DR, Wolff BG, Nagorney DM. Concurrent vs. staged colectomy and hepatectomy for primary colorectal cancer with synchronous hepatic metastases. Dis Colon Rectum. 2004;47(8):1310–6.PubMedCrossRef Chua HK, Sondenaa K, Tsiotos GG, Larson DR, Wolff BG, Nagorney DM. Concurrent vs. staged colectomy and hepatectomy for primary colorectal cancer with synchronous hepatic metastases. Dis Colon Rectum. 2004;47(8):1310–6.PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Worni M, Mantyh CR, Akushevich I, Pietrobon R, Clary BM. Is there a role for simultaneous hepatic and colorectal resections? A contemporary view from NSQIP. J Gastrointest Surg. 2012;16(11):2074–85.PubMedCrossRef Worni M, Mantyh CR, Akushevich I, Pietrobon R, Clary BM. Is there a role for simultaneous hepatic and colorectal resections? A contemporary view from NSQIP. J Gastrointest Surg. 2012;16(11):2074–85.PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Shah R, Velanovich V, Syed Z, Swartz A, Rubinfeld I. Limitations of patient-associated co-morbidity model in predicting postoperative morbidity and mortality in pancreatic operations. J Gastrointest Surg. 2012;16(5):986–92.PubMedCrossRef Shah R, Velanovich V, Syed Z, Swartz A, Rubinfeld I. Limitations of patient-associated co-morbidity model in predicting postoperative morbidity and mortality in pancreatic operations. J Gastrointest Surg. 2012;16(5):986–92.PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Merkow RP, Bentrem DJ, Cohen ME, et al. Effect of cancer surgery complexity on short-term outcomes, risk predictions, and hospital comparisons. J Am Coll Surg. 2013;217(4):685–93.PubMedCrossRef Merkow RP, Bentrem DJ, Cohen ME, et al. Effect of cancer surgery complexity on short-term outcomes, risk predictions, and hospital comparisons. J Am Coll Surg. 2013;217(4):685–93.PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Bilimoria KY, Liu Y, Paruch JL, et al. Development and evaluation of the universal ACS NSQIP Surgical Risk Calculator: a decision aid and informed consent tool for patients and surgeons. J Am Coll Surg. 2013;217(5):833–42.e1-3. Bilimoria KY, Liu Y, Paruch JL, et al. Development and evaluation of the universal ACS NSQIP Surgical Risk Calculator: a decision aid and informed consent tool for patients and surgeons. J Am Coll Surg. 2013;217(5):833–42.e1-3.
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Khuri SF, Henderson WG, Daley J, et al. Successful implementation of the Department of Veterans Affairs’ National Surgical Quality Improvement Program in the private sector: the Patient Safety in Surgery Study. Ann Surg. 2008;248(2):329–36.PubMedCrossRef Khuri SF, Henderson WG, Daley J, et al. Successful implementation of the Department of Veterans Affairs’ National Surgical Quality Improvement Program in the private sector: the Patient Safety in Surgery Study. Ann Surg. 2008;248(2):329–36.PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Khuri SF, Daley J, Henderson W, et al. The Department of Veterans Affairs’ NSQIP: the first national, validated, outcome-based, risk-adjusted, and peer-controlled program for the measurement and enhancement of the quality of surgical care. National VA Surgical Quality Improvement Program. Ann Surg. 1998;228(4):491–507.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Khuri SF, Daley J, Henderson W, et al. The Department of Veterans Affairs’ NSQIP: the first national, validated, outcome-based, risk-adjusted, and peer-controlled program for the measurement and enhancement of the quality of surgical care. National VA Surgical Quality Improvement Program. Ann Surg. 1998;228(4):491–507.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Shiloach M, Frencher SK Jr., Steeger JE, et al. Toward robust information: data quality and inter-rater reliability in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. J Am Coll Surg. 2010;210(1):6–16.PubMedCrossRef Shiloach M, Frencher SK Jr., Steeger JE, et al. Toward robust information: data quality and inter-rater reliability in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. J Am Coll Surg. 2010;210(1):6–16.PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Hsiao WC, Braun P, Dunn D, Becker ER, DeNicola M, Ketcham TR. Results and policy implications of the resource-based relative-value study. N Engl J Med. 1988;319(13):881–8.PubMedCrossRef Hsiao WC, Braun P, Dunn D, Becker ER, DeNicola M, Ketcham TR. Results and policy implications of the resource-based relative-value study. N Engl J Med. 1988;319(13):881–8.PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Hsiao WC, Yntema DB, Braun P, Dunn D, Spencer C. Measurement and analysis of intraservice work. JAMA. 1988;260(16):2361–70.PubMedCrossRef Hsiao WC, Yntema DB, Braun P, Dunn D, Spencer C. Measurement and analysis of intraservice work. JAMA. 1988;260(16):2361–70.PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Cohen ME, Bilimoria KY, Ko CY, Richards K, Hall BL. Variability in length of stay after colorectal surgery: assessment of 182 hospitals in the national surgical quality improvement program. Ann Surg. 2009;250(6):901–7.PubMedCrossRef Cohen ME, Bilimoria KY, Ko CY, Richards K, Hall BL. Variability in length of stay after colorectal surgery: assessment of 182 hospitals in the national surgical quality improvement program. Ann Surg. 2009;250(6):901–7.PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Merkow RP, Hall BL, Cohen ME, et al. Relevance of the c-statistic when evaluating risk-adjustment models in surgery. J Am Coll Surg. 2012;214(5):822–30.PubMedCrossRef Merkow RP, Hall BL, Cohen ME, et al. Relevance of the c-statistic when evaluating risk-adjustment models in surgery. J Am Coll Surg. 2012;214(5):822–30.PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Steyerberg EW, Vickers AJ, Cook NR, et al. Assessing the performance of prediction models: a framework for traditional and novel measures. Epidemiology. 2010;21(1):128–38.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Steyerberg EW, Vickers AJ, Cook NR, et al. Assessing the performance of prediction models: a framework for traditional and novel measures. Epidemiology. 2010;21(1):128–38.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Zimmitti G, Roses RE, Andreou A, et al. Greater complexity of liver surgery is not associated with an increased incidence of liver-related complications except for bile leak: an experience with 2,628 consecutive resections. J Gastrointest Surg. 2013;17(1):57–64;(discussion 64–55). Zimmitti G, Roses RE, Andreou A, et al. Greater complexity of liver surgery is not associated with an increased incidence of liver-related complications except for bile leak: an experience with 2,628 consecutive resections. J Gastrointest Surg. 2013;17(1):57–64;(discussion 64–55).
18.
Zurück zum Zitat IJitsma AJ, Appeltans BM, de Jong KP, Porte RJ, Peeters PM, Slooff MJ (2004) Extrahepatic bile duct resection in combination with liver resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma: a report of 42 cases. J Gastrointest Surg. 8(6):686–94.PubMedCrossRef IJitsma AJ, Appeltans BM, de Jong KP, Porte RJ, Peeters PM, Slooff MJ (2004) Extrahepatic bile duct resection in combination with liver resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma: a report of 42 cases. J Gastrointest Surg. 8(6):686–94.PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Raval MV, Cohen ME, Ingraham AM, et al. Improving American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program risk adjustment: incorporation of a novel procedure risk score. J Am Coll Surg. 2010;211(6):715–23.PubMedCrossRef Raval MV, Cohen ME, Ingraham AM, et al. Improving American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program risk adjustment: incorporation of a novel procedure risk score. J Am Coll Surg. 2010;211(6):715–23.PubMedCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Syed Z, Rubinfeld I, Patton JH Jr., et al. Using procedural codes to supplement risk adjustment: a nonparametric learning approach. J Am Coll Surg. 2011;212(6):1086–93.e1.CrossRef Syed Z, Rubinfeld I, Patton JH Jr., et al. Using procedural codes to supplement risk adjustment: a nonparametric learning approach. J Am Coll Surg. 2011;212(6):1086–93.e1.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Impact of Hepatectomy Surgical Complexity on Outcomes and Hospital Quality Rankings
verfasst von
Jennifer L. Paruch, MD
Ryan P. Merkow, MD, MS
David J. Bentrem, MD
Clifford Y. Ko, MD, MS, MSHS
Mitchell C. Posner, MD
Mark E. Cohen, PhD
Karl Y. Bilimoria, MD, MS
Sharon M. Weber, MD, MS
Publikationsdatum
01.06.2014
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Ausgabe 6/2014
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Elektronische ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-014-3500-5

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2014

Annals of Surgical Oncology 6/2014 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.