Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 13/2014

01.12.2014 | Gastrointestinal Oncology

Utility of the Proximal Margin Frozen Section for Resection of Gastric Adenocarcinoma: A 7-Institution Study of the US Gastric Cancer Collaborative

verfasst von: Malcolm H. Squires III, MD, MS, David A. Kooby, MD, Timothy M. Pawlik, MD, MPH, PhD, Sharon M. Weber, MD, George Poultsides, MD, Carl Schmidt, MD, Konstantinos Votanopoulos, MD, Ryan C. Fields, MD, Aslam Ejaz, MD, Alexandra W. Acher, BS, David J. Worhunsky, MD, Neil Saunders, MD, Linda X. Jin, MD, Edward Levine, MD, Clifford S. Cho, MD, Mark Bloomston, MD, Emily Winslow, MD, Kenneth Cardona, MD, Charles A. Staley III, MD, Shishir K. Maithel, MD

Erschienen in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Ausgabe 13/2014

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

The proximal gastric margin dictates the extent of resection for gastric adenocarcinoma (GAC). The value of achieving negative margins via additional gastric resection after a positive proximal margin frozen section (FS) is unknown.

Methods

The US Gastric Cancer Collaborative includes all patients who underwent resection of GAC at seven institutions from 2000–2012. Intraoperative proximal margin FS data and final permanent section (PS) data were classified as R0 or R1, respectively; positive distal margins were excluded. The primary aim was to evaluate the impact on local recurrence of converting a positive proximal FS-R1 margin to a PS-R0 final margin by additional resection. Secondary endpoints were recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS).

Results

Of 860 patients, 520 had a proximal margin FS and 67 were positive. Of these, 48 were converted to R0 on PS by additional resection. R0 proximal margin was achieved in 447 patients (86 %), PS-R1 in 25 (5 %), and converted FS-R1-to-PS-R0 in 48 (9 %). The median follow-up was 44 months. Local recurrence was significantly decreased in the converted FS-R1-to-PS-R0 group compared to the PS-R1 group (10 vs. 32 %; p = 0.01). Median RFS was similar between the FS-R1-to-PS-R0 and PS-R1 cohorts (25 vs. 20 months; p = 0.49), compared to 37 months for the PS-R0 group. Median OS was similar between the FS-R1-to-PS-R0 conversion and PS-R1 groups (36 vs. 26 months; p = 0.14) compared to 50 months for the PS-R0 group. On multivariate analysis, increasing T-stage and N-stage were associated with worse OS; the FS-R1-to-PS-R0 proximal margin conversion was not significantly associated with improved RFS (p = 0.68) or OS (p = 0.44).

Conclusion

Conversion of a positive intraoperative proximal margin frozen section during gastric cancer resection may decrease local recurrence, but it is not associated with improved RFS or OS. This may guide decisions regarding the extent of resection.
Literatur
1.
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Shin D, Park SS. Clinical importance and surgical decision-making regarding proximal resection margin for gastric cancer. World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2013;5:4–11.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Shin D, Park SS. Clinical importance and surgical decision-making regarding proximal resection margin for gastric cancer. World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2013;5:4–11.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Bickenbach KA, Gonen M, Strong V, Brennan MF, Coit DG. Association of positive transection margins with gastric cancer survival and local recurrence. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20:2663–8.PubMedCrossRef Bickenbach KA, Gonen M, Strong V, Brennan MF, Coit DG. Association of positive transection margins with gastric cancer survival and local recurrence. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20:2663–8.PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Cascinu S, Giordani P, Catalano V, Agostinelli R, Catalano G. Resection-line involvement in gastric cancer patients undergoing curative resections: implications for clinical management. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 1999;29:291–3.PubMedCrossRef Cascinu S, Giordani P, Catalano V, Agostinelli R, Catalano G. Resection-line involvement in gastric cancer patients undergoing curative resections: implications for clinical management. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 1999;29:291–3.PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim SH, Karpeh MS, Klimstra DS, Leung D, Brennan MF. Effect of microscopic resection line disease on gastric cancer survival. J Gastrointest Surg. 1999;3:24–33.PubMedCrossRef Kim SH, Karpeh MS, Klimstra DS, Leung D, Brennan MF. Effect of microscopic resection line disease on gastric cancer survival. J Gastrointest Surg. 1999;3:24–33.PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Morgagni P, Garcea D, Marrelli D, et al. Resection line involvement after gastric cancer surgery: clinical outcome in nonsurgically retreated patients. World J Surg. 2008;32:2661–7.PubMedCrossRef Morgagni P, Garcea D, Marrelli D, et al. Resection line involvement after gastric cancer surgery: clinical outcome in nonsurgically retreated patients. World J Surg. 2008;32:2661–7.PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Sun Z, Li DM, Wang ZN, Huang BJ, Xu Y, Li K, Xu HM. Prognostic significance of microscopic positive margins for gastric cancer patients with potentially curative resection. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16:3028–37.PubMedCrossRef Sun Z, Li DM, Wang ZN, Huang BJ, Xu Y, Li K, Xu HM. Prognostic significance of microscopic positive margins for gastric cancer patients with potentially curative resection. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16:3028–37.PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Wang SY, Yeh CN, Lee HL, et al. Clinical impact of positive surgical margin status on gastric cancer patients undergoing gastrectomy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16:2738–43.PubMedCrossRef Wang SY, Yeh CN, Lee HL, et al. Clinical impact of positive surgical margin status on gastric cancer patients undergoing gastrectomy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16:2738–43.PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Woo JW, Ryu KW, Park JY, et al. Prognostic impact of microscopic tumor involved resection margin in advanced gastric cancer patients after gastric resection. World J Surg. 2014;38(2):439-446.PubMedCrossRef Woo JW, Ryu KW, Park JY, et al. Prognostic impact of microscopic tumor involved resection margin in advanced gastric cancer patients after gastric resection. World J Surg. 2014;38(2):439-446.PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Cho BC, Jeung HC, Choi HJ, et al. Prognostic impact of resection margin involvement after extended (D2/D3) gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer: a 15-year experience at a single institute. J Surg Oncol. 2007;95:461–8.PubMedCrossRef Cho BC, Jeung HC, Choi HJ, et al. Prognostic impact of resection margin involvement after extended (D2/D3) gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer: a 15-year experience at a single institute. J Surg Oncol. 2007;95:461–8.PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Ishikawa M, Kitayama J, Kaizaki S, et al. Prospective randomized trial comparing Billroth I and Roux-en-Y procedures after distal gastrectomy for gastric carcinoma. World J Surg. 2005;29:1415–21.PubMedCrossRef Ishikawa M, Kitayama J, Kaizaki S, et al. Prospective randomized trial comparing Billroth I and Roux-en-Y procedures after distal gastrectomy for gastric carcinoma. World J Surg. 2005;29:1415–21.PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Takiguchi S, Yamamoto K, Hirao M, et al. A comparison of postoperative quality of life and dysfunction after Billroth I and Roux-en-Y reconstruction following distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer: results from a multi-institutional RCT. Gastric Cancer. 2012;15:198–205.PubMedCrossRef Takiguchi S, Yamamoto K, Hirao M, et al. A comparison of postoperative quality of life and dysfunction after Billroth I and Roux-en-Y reconstruction following distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer: results from a multi-institutional RCT. Gastric Cancer. 2012;15:198–205.PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim SY, Hwang YS, Sohn TS, et al. The predictors and clinical impact of positive resection margins on frozen section in gastric cancer surgery. J Gastric Cancer. 2012;12:113–9.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Kim SY, Hwang YS, Sohn TS, et al. The predictors and clinical impact of positive resection margins on frozen section in gastric cancer surgery. J Gastric Cancer. 2012;12:113–9.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Chen JD, Yang XP, Shen JG, Hu WX, Yuan XM, Wang LB. Prognostic improvement of reexcision for positive resection margins in patients with advanced gastric cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2013;39:229–34.PubMedCrossRef Chen JD, Yang XP, Shen JG, Hu WX, Yuan XM, Wang LB. Prognostic improvement of reexcision for positive resection margins in patients with advanced gastric cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2013;39:229–34.PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee JH, Ahn SH, Park do J, Kim HH, Lee HJ, Yang HK. Clinical impact of tumor infiltration at the transected surgical margin during gastric cancer surgery. J Surg Oncol. 2012;106:772–6.PubMedCrossRef Lee JH, Ahn SH, Park do J, Kim HH, Lee HJ, Yang HK. Clinical impact of tumor infiltration at the transected surgical margin during gastric cancer surgery. J Surg Oncol. 2012;106:772–6.PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat AJCC. American joint committee on cancer staging manual, 7th ed. Chicago, IL: Springer; 2010. AJCC. American joint committee on cancer staging manual, 7th ed. Chicago, IL: Springer; 2010.
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Lad NL, Squires MH, Maithel SK, et al. Is it time to stop checking frozen section neck margins during pancreaticoduodenectomy? Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20:3626–33.PubMedCrossRef Lad NL, Squires MH, Maithel SK, et al. Is it time to stop checking frozen section neck margins during pancreaticoduodenectomy? Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20:3626–33.PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240:205–13.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240:205–13.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Shen JG, Cheong JH, Hyung WJ, Kim J, Choi SH, Noh SH. Intraoperative frozen section margin evaluation in gastric cancer of the cardia surgery. Hepatogastroenterology. 2006;53:976–8.PubMed Shen JG, Cheong JH, Hyung WJ, Kim J, Choi SH, Noh SH. Intraoperative frozen section margin evaluation in gastric cancer of the cardia surgery. Hepatogastroenterology. 2006;53:976–8.PubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Papachristou DN, Agnanti N, D’Agostino H, Fortner JG. Histologically positive esophageal margin in the surgical treatment of gastric cancer. Am J Surg. 1980;139:711–3.PubMedCrossRef Papachristou DN, Agnanti N, D’Agostino H, Fortner JG. Histologically positive esophageal margin in the surgical treatment of gastric cancer. Am J Surg. 1980;139:711–3.PubMedCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Papachristou DN, Fortner JG. Local recurrence of gastric adenocarcinomas after gastrectomy. J Surg Oncol. 1981;18:47–53.PubMedCrossRef Papachristou DN, Fortner JG. Local recurrence of gastric adenocarcinomas after gastrectomy. J Surg Oncol. 1981;18:47–53.PubMedCrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat D’Angelica M, Gonen M, Brennan MF, Turnbull AD, Bains M, Karpeh MS. Patterns of initial recurrence in completely resected gastric adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg. 2004;240:808–16.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef D’Angelica M, Gonen M, Brennan MF, Turnbull AD, Bains M, Karpeh MS. Patterns of initial recurrence in completely resected gastric adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg. 2004;240:808–16.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Sano T, Mudan SS. No advantage of reoperation for positive resection margins in node positive gastric cancer patients? Jpn J Clin Oncol. 1999;29:283–4.PubMedCrossRef Sano T, Mudan SS. No advantage of reoperation for positive resection margins in node positive gastric cancer patients? Jpn J Clin Oncol. 1999;29:283–4.PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Utility of the Proximal Margin Frozen Section for Resection of Gastric Adenocarcinoma: A 7-Institution Study of the US Gastric Cancer Collaborative
verfasst von
Malcolm H. Squires III, MD, MS
David A. Kooby, MD
Timothy M. Pawlik, MD, MPH, PhD
Sharon M. Weber, MD
George Poultsides, MD
Carl Schmidt, MD
Konstantinos Votanopoulos, MD
Ryan C. Fields, MD
Aslam Ejaz, MD
Alexandra W. Acher, BS
David J. Worhunsky, MD
Neil Saunders, MD
Linda X. Jin, MD
Edward Levine, MD
Clifford S. Cho, MD
Mark Bloomston, MD
Emily Winslow, MD
Kenneth Cardona, MD
Charles A. Staley III, MD
Shishir K. Maithel, MD
Publikationsdatum
01.12.2014
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Ausgabe 13/2014
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Elektronische ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-014-3834-z

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 13/2014

Annals of Surgical Oncology 13/2014 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.