Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Pattern of Postoperative Mortality After Esophageal Cancer Resection According to Center Volume: Results from a Large European Multicenter Study

  • Thoracic Oncology
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

High center procedural volume has been shown to reduce postoperative mortality (POM); however, the cause of POM has been poorly studied previously. The aim of this study was to define the pattern of POM and major morbidity in relation to center procedural volume.

Methods

Data from 2,944 consecutive adult patients undergoing esophagectomy for esophageal cancer in 30 centers between 2000 and 2010 were retrospectively collected. Data between patients who suffered 30-day POM were compared with those who did not. Factors associated with POM were identified using binary logistic regression, with propensity matching to compare low- (LV) and high-volume (HV) centers.

Results

The 30-day and in-hospital POM rates were 5.0 and 7.3 %, respectively. Pulmonary complications were the most common, affecting 38.1 % of patients, followed by surgical site infection (15.5 %), cardiovascular complications (11.2 %), and anastomotic leak (10.2 %). Factors that were independently associated with 30-day POM included American Society of Anesthesiologists grade IV, LV center, anastomotic leak, pulmonary, cardiovascular and neurological complications, and R2 resection margin status. Surgical complications preceded POM in approximately 30 % of patients compared to medically-related causes in 68 %. Propensity-matched analysis demonstrated LV centers were significantly associated with increased 30-day POM, and POM secondary to anastomotic leak, and pulmonary- and cardiac-related causes.

Conclusions

The results of this large, multicenter study provide further evidence to support the centralization of esophagectomy to HV centers, with a lower rate of morbidity and better infrastructure to deal with complications following major surgery preventing further mortality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sauvanet A, Mariette C, Thomas P, et al. Mortality and morbidity after resection for adenocarcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction: predictive factors. J Am Coll Surg. 2005;201:253–262.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Reames BN, Ghaferi AA, Birkmeyer JD, et al. Hospital volume and operative mortality in the modern era. Ann Surg. 2014;260:244–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Mariette C, Piessen G, Balon JM, et al. Surgery alone in the curative treatment of localised oesophageal carcinoma. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2004;30:869–876.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Markar SR, Schmidt H, Kunz S, et al. Evolution of standardized clinical pathways: refining multidisciplinary care and process to improve outcomes of the surgical treatment of esophageal cancer. J Gastrointest Surg. 2014;18:1238–1446.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Markar SR, Low DE. Physiology, not chronology, dictates outcomes after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: outcomes in patients 80 years and older. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20:1020–1026.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Luketich JD, Pennathur A, Awais O, et al. Outcomes after minimally invasive esophagectomy: review of over 1000 patients. Ann Surg. 2012;256:95–103.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Markar SR, Karthikesalingam A, Thrumurthy S, et al. Volume-outcome relationship in surgery for esophageal malignancy: systematic review and meta-analysis 2000–2011. J Gastrointest Surg. 2012;16:1055–1063.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Finks JF, Osborne NH, Birkmeyer JD. Trends in hospital volume and operative mortality for high-risk surgery. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:2128–2137.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Reames BN, Ghaferi AA, Birkmeyer JD, et al. Hospital volume and operative mortality in the modern era. Ann Surg. 2014;260:244–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Almoudaris AM, Mamidanna R, Bottle A, et al. Failure to rescue patients after reintervention in gastroesophageal cancer surgery in England. JAMA Surg. 2013;148:272–276.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Findlay JM, Gillies RS, Sgromo B, et al. Individual risk modeling for esophagectomy: a systematic review. J Gastrointest Surg. 2014;18:1532–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Takeuchi H, Miyata H, Gotoh M, et al. A risk model for esophagectomy using data of 5354 patients included in a Japanese nationwide web-based database. Ann Surg. 2014;260:259–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hamai Y, Hihara J, Taomoto J, et al. Effects of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy on postoperative morbidity and mortality associated with esophageal cancer. Dis Esophagus. Epub 11 Mar 2014. doi:10.1111/dote.12207.

  14. Bosch DJ, Muijs CT, Mul VE, et al. Impact of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy on postoperative course after curative-intent transthoracic esophagectomy in esophageal cancer patients. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014;21:605–611.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240:205–213.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Sobin LH, Gospodarowicz MK, Wittekind Ch. TNM classification of malignant tumours. 7th ed. Wiley; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Briez N, Piessen G, Bonnetain F, et al. Open versus laparoscopically-assisted oesophagectomy for cancer: a multicentre randomised controlled phase III trials. The MIRO trial. BMC Cancer. 2011;11:310.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Rosenbaum PR, Rubin DB. The central role of propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika. 1983;70:41–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Schieman C, Wigle DA, Deschamps C, et al. Patterns of operative morality following esophagectomy. Dis Esophagus. 2012;25:645–651.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Rutegard M, Lagergren P, Rouvelas I, et al. Intrathoracic anastomotic leakage and mortality after esophageal cancer resection: a population-based study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19:99–103.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Munashinge A, Markar SR, Mamidanna R, et al. Is it time to centralize high-risk cancer care in the United States? Comparison of outcomes of esophagectomy between England and the United States. Ann Surg. Epub 27 Jun 2014.

Download references

Conflicts of interest

None.

Funding Sources

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christophe Mariette PhD.

Additional information

On behalf of the FREGAT (French Eso-Gastric Tumors) Working Group – FRENCH (Fédération de Recherche EN CHirurgie) – AFC (Association Française de Chirurgie). The FREGAT working group – FRENCH – AFC Collaborators’ list is given in Appendix.

Appendices

Appendix 1

Surgical Complications

Anastomotic leak was defined as any esophagogastric anastomosis dehiscence that was clinically symptomatic (abscess, mediastinitis, digestive liquid externalizing drainage) or asymptomatic detected by contrast study. In case of doubt, the diagnosis was confirmed by gastroscopy without insufflation performed by an experienced physician.

Surgical site infection was defined as superficial pus expressed from the abdominal, thoracic, or drains incision sites, requiring surgical debridement and antibiotic treatment.

Chylothorax was suspected when a major pleural effusion was seen in the first postoperative week upon resumption of feeding, and was defined by the presence of pleural or abdominal fluid, rich in chylomicrons and lymphocytes.

Postoperative hemorrhage was defined as blood loss requiring endoscopic or surgical intervention.

Gastroparesis was defined as the occurrence of vomiting after removal of the nasogastric tube or distension of the gastric conduit on plain radiograph after day 5 postoperatively, requiring repositioning of the nasogastric tube despite prokinetic treatment.

Medical Complications

Pulmonary complications included bronchial congestion, disorders of ventilation, atelectasis, pneumonia, respiratory failure, and acute respiratory distress syndrome.

Cardiovascular complications included angina, myocardial infarction, arrhythmia, and cardiac insufficiency.

Thromboembolic complications included deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism.

Neurological complications included temporospatial disorientation, transient ischemic attack, and cerebrovascular accident.

Appendix 2

List of Collaborators

Abdennahceur Dhahri, MD, PhD, Delphine Lignier, MD, Cyril Cossé, MD, Jean-Marc Regimbeau, MD, PhD, Department of Digestive Surgery Amiens, France; Denis Collet, MD, Department of Digestive Surgery, Bordeaux, France; Magalie Cabau, MD, Jacques Jougon, MD, PhD, Department of Thoracic Surgery, Bordeaux, France; Patrick Lozach, MD, Jean Pierre Bail, MD, Department of Digestive Surgery, Brest, France; Serge Cappeliez, MD, PhD, Issam El Nakadi, MD, PhD, Department of Digestive Surgery, Brussel ULB Erasme Bordet University, Brussel, Belgium; Gil Lebreton, MD, Arnaud Alves, MD, PhD, Department of Digestive Surgery, Caen, France; Renaud Flamein, MD, Denis Pezet, MD, PhD, Department of Digestive Surgery, Clermont-Ferrand, France; Federica Pipitone, MD, Bogdan Stan-Iuga, MD, Nicolas Contival, MD, Eric Pappalardo, MD, Simon Msika, MD, PhD, Department of Digestive Surgery, Louis Mourier University Hospital, Colombes, France; Styliani Mantziari, MD, Nicolas Demartines, Department of Digestive Surgery, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland; Flora Hec, MD, Marguerite Vanderbeken, MD, Williams Tessier, MD, Nicolas Briez, MD, Department of Digestive Surgery, Lille, France; Fabien Fredon, MD, Alain Gainant, MD, Muriel Mathonnet, MD, PhD, Department of Digestive Surgery, Limoges, France; Salim Mezoughi, MD, Christian Ducerf, MD, Jacques Baulieux, MD, Jean-Yves Mabrut, MD, PhD, Department of Digestive Surgery, Croix Rousse University Hospital, Lyon, France; Arnaud Pasquer, MD, Oussama Baraket, MD, Gilles Poncet, MD, Mustapha Adam, MD, PhD, Department of Digestive Surgery, Edouard Herriot University Hospital, Lyon, France; Delphine Vaudoyer, MD, Peggy Jourdan Enfer, MD, Laurent Villeneuve, MD, Olivier Glehen, MD, PhD, Department of Digestive Surgery, Lyon Sud University Hospital, Lyon, France; Thibault Coste, MD, Jean-Michel Fabre, MD, Department of Digestive Surgery, Montpellier, France; Frédéric Marchal, MD, Department of Digestive Surgery, Institut de cancérologie de Lorraine, Nancy, France; Romain Frisoni, MD, Ahmet Ayav, MD, PhD, Laurent Brunaud, MD, PhD, Laurent Bresler, MD, Department of Digestive Surgery, Nancy, France; Charlotte Cohen, MD, Olivier Aze, MD, Nicolas Venissac, MD, Daniel Pop, MD, Jérôme Mouroux, MD, Department of Thoracic Surgery, Nice, France; Ion Donici, MD, Michel Prudhomme, MD, PhD, Department of Digestive Surgery, Nîmes, France; Emanuele Felli, MD, Stéphanie Lisunfui, MD, Marie Seman, MD, Gaelle Godiris Petit, MD, Mehdi Karoui, MD, PhD, Christophe Tresallet, MD, PhD, Fabrice Ménégaux, MD, PhD, Jean-Christophe Vaillant, MD, Laurent Hannoun, MD, Department of Digestive Surgery, Pitié-Salpétrière University Hospital, Paris, France; Brice Malgras, MD, Denis Lantuas, MD, Karine Pautrat, MD, Marc Pocard, MD, PhD, Patrice Valleur, MD, Department of Digestive Surgery, Lariboisière University Hospital, Paris, France; Najim Chafai, MD, Pierre Balladur, MD, Magalie Lefrançois, MD, Yann Parc, MD, PhD, François Paye, MD, PhD, Emmanuel Tiret, MD, Department of Digestive Surgery, Saint-Antoine University Hospital, Paris, France; Marius Nedelcu, MD, Letizia Laface, MD, Thierry Perniceni, MD, Brice Gayet, MD, Department of Digestive Surgery, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris, France; Bernard Meunier, MD, Department of Digestive Surgery, Rennes, France; Alexandre Filipello, MD, Jack Porcheron, MD, Olivier Tiffet, MD, PhD, Department of Digestive Surgery, Saint-Etienne, France; Noémie Kamlet, MD, Rodrigue Chemaly, MD, Amandine Klipfel, MD, Patrick Pessaux, MD, PhD, Cecile Brigand, MD, PhD, Serge Rohr, MD, Department of Digestive Surgery, Strasbourg, France; Nicolas Carrère, MD, PhD, Department of Digestive Surgery, Toulouse, France; Chiara Da Re, MD, Frédéric Dumont, MD, Diane Goéré, MD, PhD, Dominique Elias, MD, Department of Digestive Surgery Institut Gustave-Roussy,Villejuif, France; Claude Bertrand, MD, Mont-Godinne University Hospital, Yvoir, Belgium.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Markar, S., Gronnier, C., Duhamel, A. et al. Pattern of Postoperative Mortality After Esophageal Cancer Resection According to Center Volume: Results from a Large European Multicenter Study. Ann Surg Oncol 22, 2615–2623 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-014-4310-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-014-4310-5

Keywords

Navigation