Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 11/2015

01.10.2015 | Reconstructive Oncology

Assessing Outcomes and Safety of Inpatient Versus Outpatient Tissue Expander Immediate Breast Reconstruction

verfasst von: Charles Qin, BA, Anuja K. Antony, MD, Apas Aggarwal, BA, Sumanas Jordan, MD, Karol A. Gutowski, MD, John Y. S. Kim, MD

Erschienen in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Ausgabe 11/2015

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

With the rising cost of healthcare delivery and bundled payments for episodes of care, there has been impetus to minimize hospitalization and increase utilization of outpatient surgery mechanisms. Given the increase in outpatient mastectomy and immediate tissue expander (TE)-based reconstruction and the paucity of data on its comparative safety to inpatient procedures, we sought to understand the risk for early postoperative complications in an outpatient model compared with more traditional inpatient status using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database.

Methods

NSQIP data files from 2005 to 2012 were queried to identify patients undergoing immediate TE-based breast reconstruction after mastectomy. Patients were stratified by whether they received outpatient or inpatient care and then propensity score matched based on preoperative baseline characteristics to produce matched cohorts. Multivariate regression analysis was used to determine whether outpatient versus inpatient status conferred differing risk for 30-days complications.

Results

Of the 2014 patients who met criteria, 1:1 propensity matching yielded 634 patients in each of the matched cohorts. Overall complications (5.2 vs. 5.4 %), overall surgical complications (4.3 vs. 3.9 %), overall medical complications (1.3 vs. 2.1 %), and return to the operating room (6.6 vs. 7.3 %) were similar between outpatient and inpatients cohorts (p > .2), respectively. There was a small, but significant increased risk of organ/space SSI in outpatients (1.9 vs. 0.5 %, p = .02) and trend for increased risk for pulmonary embolus (PE) and urinary tract infection (UTI) in inpatients (0.3 vs. 0 %, p = .16; 0.3 vs. 0 %, p = .16).

Conclusions

Our studies suggest that outpatient TE confers similar safety profiles to inpatient TE with regards to 30-day postoperative overall complications, medical and surgical morbidity, and return to the operating room. A slightly increased risk for surgical site infection must be balanced against potential risk for known inpatient-related complications such as UTI and PE.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Warren JL, Riley GF, Potosky AL, Klabunde CN, Richter E, Ballard-Barbash R. Trends and outcomes of outpatient mastectomy in elderly women. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1998;90:833–40.CrossRefPubMed Warren JL, Riley GF, Potosky AL, Klabunde CN, Richter E, Ballard-Barbash R. Trends and outcomes of outpatient mastectomy in elderly women. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1998;90:833–40.CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Case C, Johantgen M, Steiner C. Outpatient mastectomy: clinical, payer, and geographic influences. Health Serv Res. 2001;36:869–84.PubMedCentralPubMed Case C, Johantgen M, Steiner C. Outpatient mastectomy: clinical, payer, and geographic influences. Health Serv Res. 2001;36:869–84.PubMedCentralPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Ferrante, J, Gonzalez E, Pal N, Roetzheim R. The use and outcomes of outpatient mastectomy in Florida. Am J Surg. 2000;179:253–9; discussion 259–60. Ferrante, J, Gonzalez E, Pal N, Roetzheim R. The use and outcomes of outpatient mastectomy in Florida. Am J Surg. 2000;179:253–9; discussion 259–60.
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Kruper L, Xu XX, Henderson K, Bernstein L, Chen SL. Utilization of mastectomy and reconstruction in the outpatient setting. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20:828–35.CrossRefPubMed Kruper L, Xu XX, Henderson K, Bernstein L, Chen SL. Utilization of mastectomy and reconstruction in the outpatient setting. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20:828–35.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Bian J, Krontiras H, Allison H. Outpatient mastectomy and breast reconstructive surgery. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15:1032–9.CrossRefPubMed Bian J, Krontiras H, Allison H. Outpatient mastectomy and breast reconstructive surgery. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15:1032–9.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Simpson SA, Ying BL, Ross LA, et al. Incidence of complications in outpatient mastectomy with immediate reconstruction. J Am Coll Surg. 2007;205:463–7.CrossRefPubMed Simpson SA, Ying BL, Ross LA, et al. Incidence of complications in outpatient mastectomy with immediate reconstruction. J Am Coll Surg. 2007;205:463–7.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Xue DQ, Qian C, Yang L, Wang XF., Risk factors for surgical site infections after breast surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2012;38:375–81.CrossRefPubMed Xue DQ, Qian C, Yang L, Wang XF., Risk factors for surgical site infections after breast surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2012;38:375–81.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Shaikh-Naidu N, Preminger BA, Rogers K, Messina P, Gayle LB. Determinants of aesthetic satisfaction following TRAM and implant breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg. 2004;52:465–70; discussion 470.CrossRefPubMed Shaikh-Naidu N, Preminger BA, Rogers K, Messina P, Gayle LB. Determinants of aesthetic satisfaction following TRAM and implant breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg. 2004;52:465–70; discussion 470.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Gurunluoglu R, Gurunluoglu A, Williams SA, Tebockhorst S. Current trends in breast reconstruction: survey of American Society of Plastic Surgeons 2010. Ann Plast Surg. 2013;70:103–10.CrossRefPubMed Gurunluoglu R, Gurunluoglu A, Williams SA, Tebockhorst S. Current trends in breast reconstruction: survey of American Society of Plastic Surgeons 2010. Ann Plast Surg. 2013;70:103–10.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Cema, Y, Albornoz CR, Disa JJ, et al. A paradigm shift in U.S. breast reconstruction: Part 2. The influence of changing mastectomy patterns on reconstructive rate and method. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;131:320e–6e.CrossRef Cema, Y, Albornoz CR, Disa JJ, et al. A paradigm shift in U.S. breast reconstruction: Part 2. The influence of changing mastectomy patterns on reconstructive rate and method. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;131:320e–6e.CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Albornoz CR, Albornoz CR, Disa JJ, et al. A paradigm shift in U.S. Breast reconstruction: increasing implant rates. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;131:15–23.CrossRefPubMed Albornoz CR, Albornoz CR, Disa JJ, et al. A paradigm shift in U.S. Breast reconstruction: increasing implant rates. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;131:15–23.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Fischer JP, Nelson JA, Serletti JM, Wu LC. Peri-operative risk factors associated with early tissue expander (TE) loss following immediate breast reconstruction (IBR): a review of 9305 patients from the 2005-2010 ACS-NSQIP datasets. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2013;66:1504–12.CrossRefPubMed Fischer JP, Nelson JA, Serletti JM, Wu LC. Peri-operative risk factors associated with early tissue expander (TE) loss following immediate breast reconstruction (IBR): a review of 9305 patients from the 2005-2010 ACS-NSQIP datasets. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2013;66:1504–12.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Fischer JP, Wes AM, Tuggle CT 3rd, Serletti JM, Wu LC. Risk analysis of early implant loss after immediate breast reconstruction: a review of 14,585 patients. J Am Coll Surg. 2013;217:983–90.CrossRefPubMed Fischer JP, Wes AM, Tuggle CT 3rd, Serletti JM, Wu LC. Risk analysis of early implant loss after immediate breast reconstruction: a review of 14,585 patients. J Am Coll Surg. 2013;217:983–90.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Peled AW, Stover AC, Foster RD, McGrath MH, Hwang ES. Long-term reconstructive outcomes after expander-implant breast reconstruction with serious infectious or wound-healing complications. Ann Plast Surg. 2012;68:369–73.CrossRefPubMed Peled AW, Stover AC, Foster RD, McGrath MH, Hwang ES. Long-term reconstructive outcomes after expander-implant breast reconstruction with serious infectious or wound-healing complications. Ann Plast Surg. 2012;68:369–73.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Birkmeyer JD, Shahian DM, Dimick JB, et al. Blueprint for a new American College of Surgeons: National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. J Am Coll Surg. 2008;207:777–82.CrossRefPubMed Birkmeyer JD, Shahian DM, Dimick JB, et al. Blueprint for a new American College of Surgeons: National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. J Am Coll Surg. 2008;207:777–82.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Ingraham AM, Richards KE, Hall BL, Ko CY. Quality improvement in surgery: the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program approach. Adv Surg. 2010;44:251–67.CrossRefPubMed Ingraham AM, Richards KE, Hall BL, Ko CY. Quality improvement in surgery: the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program approach. Adv Surg. 2010;44:251–67.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Austin PC. Some methods of propensity-score matching had superior performance to others: results of an empirical investigation and Monte Carlo simulations. Biom J. 2009;51:171–84.CrossRefPubMed Austin PC. Some methods of propensity-score matching had superior performance to others: results of an empirical investigation and Monte Carlo simulations. Biom J. 2009;51:171–84.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Austin PC. Optimal caliper widths for propensity-score matching when estimating differences in means and differences in proportions in observational studies. Pharm Stat. 2011;10:150–61.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Austin PC. Optimal caliper widths for propensity-score matching when estimating differences in means and differences in proportions in observational studies. Pharm Stat. 2011;10:150–61.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Merkow RP, Bilimoria KY, Hall BL. Interpretation of the C-statistic in the context of ACS-NSQIP models. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011;18 Suppl 3:S295; author reply S296.CrossRefPubMed Merkow RP, Bilimoria KY, Hall BL. Interpretation of the C-statistic in the context of ACS-NSQIP models. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011;18 Suppl 3:S295; author reply S296.CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Paul P, Pennell ML, Lemeshow S. Standardizing the power of the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness of fit test in large data sets. Stat Med. 2013;32:67–80.CrossRefPubMed Paul P, Pennell ML, Lemeshow S. Standardizing the power of the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness of fit test in large data sets. Stat Med. 2013;32:67–80.CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Washer LL, Gutowski K. Breast implant infections. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2012;26:111–25.CrossRefPubMed Washer LL, Gutowski K. Breast implant infections. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2012;26:111–25.CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Khavanin N, Mlodinow A, Kim JY, Ver Halen JP, Antony AK, Samant S. Assessing safety and outcomes in outpatient versus inpatient thyroidectomy using the NSQIP: a propensity score matched analysis of 16,370 patients. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22:429–36.CrossRefPubMed Khavanin N, Mlodinow A, Kim JY, Ver Halen JP, Antony AK, Samant S. Assessing safety and outcomes in outpatient versus inpatient thyroidectomy using the NSQIP: a propensity score matched analysis of 16,370 patients. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22:429–36.CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Clayton JL, Bazakas A, Lee CN, Hultman CS, Halvorson EG. Once is not enough: withholding postoperative prophylactic antibiotics in prosthetic breast reconstruction is associated with an increased risk of infection. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;130:495–502.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Clayton JL, Bazakas A, Lee CN, Hultman CS, Halvorson EG. Once is not enough: withholding postoperative prophylactic antibiotics in prosthetic breast reconstruction is associated with an increased risk of infection. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;130:495–502.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Lu L, Fine NA. The efficacy of continuous local anesthetic infiltration in breast surgery: reduction mammaplasty and reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005;115:1927–34; discussion 1935–6.CrossRefPubMed Lu L, Fine NA. The efficacy of continuous local anesthetic infiltration in breast surgery: reduction mammaplasty and reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005;115:1927–34; discussion 1935–6.CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Pacik PT, Nelson CE, Werner C. Pain control in augmentation mammaplasty: safety and efficacy of indwelling catheters in 644 consecutive patients. Aesthet Surg J. 2008;28:279–84.CrossRefPubMed Pacik PT, Nelson CE, Werner C. Pain control in augmentation mammaplasty: safety and efficacy of indwelling catheters in 644 consecutive patients. Aesthet Surg J. 2008;28:279–84.CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Assessing Outcomes and Safety of Inpatient Versus Outpatient Tissue Expander Immediate Breast Reconstruction
verfasst von
Charles Qin, BA
Anuja K. Antony, MD
Apas Aggarwal, BA
Sumanas Jordan, MD
Karol A. Gutowski, MD
John Y. S. Kim, MD
Publikationsdatum
01.10.2015
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Ausgabe 11/2015
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Elektronische ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-015-4407-5

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 11/2015

Annals of Surgical Oncology 11/2015 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.