Skip to main content
Hauptrubriken
CME Facharzt-Training Webinare Zeitschriften Bücher e.Medpedia Podcast
Service
Jobbörse Info & Hilfe
Fachgebiete
Anästhesiologie Allgemeinmedizin Arbeitsmedizin Augenheilkunde Chirurgie Dermatologie Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe HNO Innere Medizin Kardiologie Neurologie Onkologie und Hämatologie Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie Pädiatrie Pathologie Psychiatrie Radiologie Rechtsmedizin Urologie Zahnmedizin
Themen
Klimawandel und Gesundheit Neues aus dem Markt COVID-19 Praxis und Beruf Seltene Erkrankungen GOÄ & EBM Panorama
Sammlungen
Kasuistiken Algorithmen & Infografiken Blickdiagnosen Arthropedia FlapFinder (für Dermatochirurgen) Videos Kongressberichterstattung Medizin für Apothekerinnen und Apotheker Für Ärztinnen und Ärzte in Weiterbildung Für Medizinstudierende

Live-Webinar: Aktuelle Leitlinien bei Herz-Kreislauf-Erkrankungen

Konkret geht es um den Diabetes-Patienten mit kardiovaskulären Erkrankungen oder Risiken, die Herzinsuffizienz sowie die kardiovaskuläre Primär- und Sekundärprävention. Sind Sie hier schon auf dem neuesten Stand? Unsere Experten beleuchten, wo und warum das bisherige Procedere geändert werden soll und was in der Praxis sinnvoll ist. Holen Sie sich Ihr Update und 2 CME-Punkte beim MMW-Webinar am 24. April von 17.30 bis 19 Uhr. 
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Annals of Surgical Oncology
Erschienen in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 13/2015

01.12.2015 | Reconstructive Oncology

Systematic Review: Aesthetic Assessment of Breast Reconstruction Outcomes by Healthcare Professionals

verfasst von: Saskia W. M. C. Maass, MD, Shaghayegh Bagher, MSc, Stefan O. P. Hofer, MD, PhD, Nancy N. Baxter, MD, PhD, Toni Zhong, MD, MHS

Erschienen in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Ausgabe 13/2015

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Achieving an aesthetic outcome following postmastectomy breast reconstruction is both an important goal for the patient and plastic surgeon. However, there is currently an absence of a widely accepted, standardized, and validated professional aesthetic assessment scale following postmastectomy breast reconstruction.

Methods

A systematic review was performed to identify all articles that provided professional assessment of the aesthetic outcome following postmastectomy, implant- or autologous tissue-based breast reconstruction. A modified version of the Scientific Advisory Committee’s Medical Outcomes Trust (MOT) criteria was used to evaluate all professional aesthetic assessment scales identified by our systematic review. The criteria included conceptual framework formation, reliability, validity, responsiveness, interpretability, burden, and correlation with patient-reported outcomes.

Results

A total of 120 articles were identified: 52 described autologous breast reconstruction, 37 implant-based reconstruction, and 29 both. Of the 12 different professional aesthetic assessment scales that exist in the literature, the most commonly used scale was the four-point professional aesthetic assessment scale. The highest score on the modified MOT criteria was assigned to the ten-point professional aesthetic assessment scale. However, this scale has limited clinical usefulness due to its poor responsiveness to change, lack of interpretability, and wide range of intra- and inter-rater agreements (Veiga et al. in Ann Plast Surg 48(5):515–520, 2002).

Conclusions

A “gold standard” professional aesthetic assessment scale needs to be developed to enhance the comparability of breast reconstruction results across techniques, surgeons, and studies to aid with the selection of procedures that produce the best aesthetic results from both the perspectives of the surgeon and patients.
Literatur
1.
Veiga DF, Neto MS, Garcia EB, et al. Evaluations of the aesthetic results and patient satisfaction with the late pedicled TRAM flap breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg. 2002;48(5):515–20.PubMed
2.
Eltahir Y, Werners LL, Dreise MM, et al. Quality-of-life outcomes between mastectomy alone and breast reconstruction: comparison of patient-reported BREAST-Q and other health-related quality-of-life measures. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;132(2):201e–9e.PubMed
3.
Haekens CM, Enajat M, Keymeulen K, Van der Hulst RR. Self-esteem and patients’ satisfaction after deep inferior epigastric perforator flap breast reconstruction. Plast Surg Nurs. 2011;31(4):160–6.PubMed
4.
Potter S, Harcourt D, Cawthorn S, et al. Assessment of cosmesis after breast reconstruction surgery: a systematic review. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011;18(3):813–23.PubMed
5.
Kim MS, Sbalchiero JC, Reece GP, Miller MJ, Beahm EK, Markey MK. Assessment of breast aesthetics. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;121(4):186e–94e.PubMedCentralPubMed
6.
Munshi A, Kakkar S, Bhutani R, Jalali R, Budrukkar A, Dinshaw KA. Factors influencing cosmetic outcome in breast conservation. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2009;21(4):285–93.PubMed
7.
Cohen M, Evanoff B, George LT, Brandt KE. A subjective rating scale for evaluating the appearance outcome of autologous breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005;116(2):440–9.PubMed
8.
Lowery JC, Wilkins EG, Kuzon WM, Davis JA. Evaluations of aesthetic results in breast reconstruction: an analysis of reliability. Ann Plast Surg. 1996;36(6):601–6; discussion 607.PubMed
9.
Lohr KN, Aaronson NK, Alonso J, et al. Evaluating quality-of-life and health status instruments: development of scientific review criteria. Clin Ther. 1996;18(5):979–92.PubMed
10.
Terwee CB, Bot SD, de Boer MR, et al. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007;60(1):34–42.PubMed
11.
Aaronson N, Alonso J, Burnam A, et al. Assessing health status and quality-of-life instruments: attributes and review criteria. Qual Life Res. 2002;11(3):193–205.PubMed
12.
Andresen EM. Criteria for assessing the tools of disability outcomes research. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2000;81(12 Suppl 2):S15–20.PubMed
13.
McDowell I. Measuring health: a guide to rating scales and questionnaires. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2006.
14.
Lundberg M, Grimby-Ekman A, Verbunt J, Simmonds MJ. Pain-related fear: a critical review of the related measures. Pain Res Treat. 2011;2011:494196.PubMedCentralPubMed
15.
Cano SJ, Browne JP, Lamping DL, Roberts AH, McGrouther DA, Black NA. The Patient Outcomes of Surgery-Head/Neck (POS-head/neck): a new patient-based outcome measure. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2006;59(1):65–73.PubMed
16.
Streiner DL, Norman GR. Health measurement scales: a practical guide to their development and use. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2008.
17.
Nunnally J, Bernstein I. Psychometric theory, 3rd edn. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1994.
18.
Guyatt GH, Deyo RA, Charlson M, Levine MN, Mitchell A. Responsiveness and validity in health status measurement: a clarification. J Clin Epidemiol. 1989;42(5):403–8.PubMed
19.
Baxter NN, Rothenberger DA, Lowry AC. Measuring fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum. 2003;46(12):1591–605.PubMed
20.
Vrieling C, Collette L, Bartelink E, et al. Validation of the methods of cosmetic assessment after breast-conserving therapy in the EORTC “boost versus no boost” trial. EORTC Radiotherapy and Breast Cancer Cooperative Groups. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1999;45(3):667–76.PubMed
21.
Fleiss JL. Statistical methods for rates and proportions. 2nd edn. New York: Wiley; 1981.
22.
Siegel S, Castellan NJ. Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1988.
23.
Schuster RH, Kuske RR, Young VL, Fineberg B. Breast reconstruction in women treated with radiation therapy for breast cancer: cosmesis, complications, and tumor control. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1992;90(3):445-52; discussion 453–4.PubMed
24.
Thomson HJ, Potter S, Greenwood RJ, et al. A prospective longitudinal study of cosmetic outcome in immediate latissimus dorsi breast reconstruction and the influence of radiotherapy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15(4):1081–91.PubMed
25.
Garbay JR, Rietjens M, Petit JY. Esthetic results of breast reconstruction after amputation for cancer. 323 cases. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 1992;21(4):405–12.PubMed
26.
Carlson GW, Losken A, Moore B, et al. Results of immediate breast reconstruction after skin-sparing mastectomy. Ann Plast Surg. 2001;46(3):222–8.PubMed
27.
Baker DG, Leith JT. Protection of the skin of mice against irradiation with cyclotron-accelerated helium ions by 2-mercaptoethylamine. Acta Radiol Ther Phys Biol. 1975;14(6):561–71.PubMed
28.
Spear SL, Baker JL, Jr. Classification of capsular contracture after prosthetic breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1995;96(5):1119–23; discussion 1124.PubMed
29.
Ramon Y, Ullmann Y, Moscona R, et al. Aesthetic results and patient satisfaction with immediate breast reconstruction using tissue expansion: a follow-up study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1997;99(3):686–91.PubMed
30.
Mukaka MM. Statistics corner: A guide to appropriate use of correlation coefficient in medical research. Malawi Med J. 2012;24(3):69–71.PubMedCentralPubMed
31.
Visser NJ, Damen TH, Timman R, Hofer SO, Mureau MA. Surgical results, aesthetic outcome, and patient satisfaction after microsurgical autologous breast reconstruction following failed implant reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;126(1):26–36.PubMed
32.
Gui GP, Tan SM, Faliakou EC, Choy C, A’Hern R, Ward A. Immediate breast reconstruction using biodimensional anatomical permanent expander implants: a prospective analysis of outcome and patient satisfaction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003;111(1):125–38; discussion 139–40.
33.
Nicholson RM, Leinster S, Sassoon EM. A comparison of the cosmetic and psychological outcome of breast reconstruction, breast conserving surgery and mastectomy without reconstruction. Breast. 2007;16(4):396–410.PubMed
34.
Rose MA, Olivotto I, Cady B, et al. Conservative surgery and radiation therapy for early breast cancer. Long-term cosmetic results. Arch Surg. 1989;124(2):153–7.PubMed
35.
Harris JR, Levene MB, Svensson G, Hellman S. Analysis of cosmetic results following primary radiation therapy for stages I and II carcinoma of the breast. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1979;5(2):257–61.PubMed
36.
Harris JR. Breast-conserving therapy as a model for creating new knowledge in clinical oncology. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1996;35(4):641–8.PubMed
37.
Preuss J, Lester L, Saunders C. BCCT.core—can a computer program be used for the assessment of aesthetic outcome after breast reconstructive surgery? Breast. 2012;21(4):597–600.PubMed
38.
Song AY, Fernstrom MH, Scott JA, Ren DX, Rubin JP, Shestak KC. Assessment of TRAM aesthetics: the importance of subunit integration. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;117(1):15–24.PubMed
39.
Shrout PE, Fleiss JL. Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull. 1979;86(2):420–8.PubMed
40.
Salgarello M, Farallo E. Immediate breast reconstruction with definitive anatomical implants after skin-sparing mastectomy. Br J Plast Surg. 2005;58(2):216–22.PubMed
41.
Chawla AK, Kachnic LA, Taghian AG, Niemierko A, Zapton DT, Powell SN. Radiotherapy and breast reconstruction: complications and cosmesis with TRAM versus tissue expander/implant. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2002;54(2):520–6.PubMed
42.
Cronbach LJ. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika. 1951;16(3):297–334.
43.
Gahm J, Edsander-Nord A, Jurell G, Wickman M. No differences in aesthetic outcome or patient satisfaction between anatomically shaped and round expandable implants in bilateral breast reconstructions: a randomized study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;126(5):1419–27.PubMed
44.
Fortin AJ, Cheang M, Latosinsky S. Cosmetic outcomes following breast conservation therapy: in search of a reliable scale. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2006;100(1):65–70.PubMed
45.
Jaeschke R, Singer J, Guyatt GH. Measurement of health status. Ascertaining the minimal clinically important difference. Control Clin Trials. 1989;10(4):407–15.PubMed
46.
Munhoz AM, Montag E, Arruda EG, et al. The role of the lateral thoracodorsal fasciocutaneous flap in immediate conservative breast surgery reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;117(6):1699–710.PubMed
47.
Pusic AL, Klassen AF, Scott AM, Klok JA, Cordeiro PG, Cano SJ. Development of a new patient-reported outcome measure for breast surgery: the BREAST-Q. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;124(2):345–53.PubMed
48.
Al-Ghazal SK, Blamey RW. Subcutaneous mastectomy with implant reconstruction: cosmetic outcome and patient satisfaction. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2000;26(2):137–41.PubMed
49.
Bacilious N, Cordeiro PG, Disa JJ, Hidalgo DA. Breast reconstruction using tissue expanders and implants in Hodgkin’s patients with prior mantle irradiation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002;109(1):102–7.PubMed
50.
Bassiouny MM, Maamoun SI, El-Shazly Sel D, Youssef OZ. TRAM flap for immediate post mastectomy reconstruction: comparison between pedicled and free transfer. J Egypt Natl Canc Inst. 2005;17(4):231–8.PubMed
51.
Crisera CA, Chang EI, Da Lio AL, Festekjian JH, Mehrara BJ. Immediate free flap reconstruction for advanced-stage breast cancer: is it safe? Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;128(1):32–41.PubMed
52.
Delay E, Gratadour AC, Jorquera F, Zlatoff P, Bremond A. Immediate autologous latissimus breast reconstruction after skin sparing mastectomy. Eur J Plast Surg. 1999;22(2/3):111–8.
53.
Delay E, Jorquera F, Pasi P, Gratadour AC. Autologous latissimus breast reconstruction in association with the abdominal advancement flap: a new refinement in breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg. 1999;42(1):67–75.PubMed
54.
Denewer A, Setit A, Farouk O. Outcome of pectoralis major myomammary flap for post-mastectomy breast reconstruction: extended experience. World J Surg. 2007;31(7):1382–6.PubMed
55.
Disa JJ, McCarthy CM, Mehrara BJ, Pusic AL, Cordeiro PG. Immediate latissimus dorsi/prosthetic breast reconstruction following salvage mastectomy after failed lumpectomy/irradiation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;121(4):159e–64e.PubMed
56.
Drucker-Zertuche M, Robles-Vidal C. A 7 year experience with immediate breast reconstruction after skin sparing mastectomy for cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2007;33(2):140–6.PubMed
57.
Drucker-Zertuche M, Bargallo-Rocha E, Zamora-Del RR. Radiotherapy and immediate expander/implant breast reconstruction: should reconstruction be delayed? Breast J. 2011;17(4):365–70.PubMed
58.
Fan LJ, Jiang J, Yang XH, et al. A prospective study comparing endoscopic subcutaneous mastectomy plus immediate reconstruction with implants and breast conserving surgery for breast cancer. Chin Med J (Engl). 2009;122(24):2945–50.PubMed
59.
Fayman MS, Potgieter E, Becker PJ. The pedicle tram flap: a focus on improved aesthetic outcome. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2006;30(3):301–8.PubMed
60.
Fersis N, Hoenig A, Relakis K, Pinis S, Wallwiener D. Skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction: incidence of recurrence in patients with invasive breast cancer. Breast. 2004;13(6):488–93.PubMed
61.
Hidalgo DA. Aesthetic refinement in breast reconstruction: complete skin-sparing mastectomy with autogenous tissue transfer. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1998;102(1):63–70; discussion 71–2.
62.
Ho AL, Tyldesley S, Macadam SA, Lennox PA. Skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate autologous breast reconstruction in locally advanced breast cancer patients: a UBC perspective. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19(3):892–900.PubMed
63.
Kroll SS, Baldwin B. A comparison of outcomes using three different methods of breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1992;90(3):455–62.PubMed
64.
Kroll SS, Schusterman MA, Reece GP, Miller MJ, Smith B. Breast reconstruction with myocutaneous flaps in previously irradiated patients. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1994;93(3):460–9; discussion 470–1.
65.
Kroll SS, Coffey JA, Jr., Winn RJ, Schusterman MA. A comparison of factors affecting aesthetic outcomes of TRAM flap breast reconstructions. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1995;96(4):860–4.PubMed
66.
Kronowitz SJ, Robb GL, Youssef A, et al. Optimizing autologous breast reconstruction in thin patients. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003;112(7):1768–78.PubMed
67.
Kronowitz SJ, Feledy JA, Hunt KK, et al. Determining the optimal approach to breast reconstruction after partial mastectomy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;117(1):1–11; discussion 12–4.
68.
Kuske RR, Schuster R, Klein E, Young L, Perez CA, Fineberg B. Radiotherapy and breast reconstruction: clinical results and dosimetry. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1991;21(2):339–46.PubMed
69.
Mosahebi A, Ramakrishnan V, Gittos M, Collier DS. Envelope mastectomy and immediate reconstruction (EMIR), improving outcome without oncological compromise. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2006;59(10):1025–30.PubMed
70.
Mosahebi A, Ramakrishnan V, Gittos M, Collier J. Aesthetic outcome of different techniques of reconstruction following nipple-areola-preserving envelope mastectomy with immediate reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;119(3):796–803.PubMed
71.
Munhoz AM, Aldrighi C, Montag E, et al. Optimizing the nipple-areola sparing mastectomy with double concentric periareolar incision and biodimensional expander-implant reconstruction: aesthetic and technical refinements. Breast. 2009;18(6):356–67.PubMed
72.
Munhoz AM, Aldrighi C, Montag E, et al. Periareolar skin-sparing mastectomy and latissimus dorsi flap with biodimensional expander implant reconstruction: surgical planning, outcome, and complications. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;119(6):1637–49; discussion 1650–2.
73.
Noguchi M, Saito Y, Mizukami Y, et al. Breast deformity, its correction, and assessment of breast conserving surgery. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 1991;18(2):111–8.PubMed
74.
Noguchi M, Saito Y, Taniya T, et al. Wide resection with latissimus dorsi muscle transposition in breast conserving surgery. Surg Oncol. 1992;1(3):231–6.PubMed
75.
Noguchi M, Earashi M, Ohta N, et al. Mastectomy with and without immediate breast reconstruction using a musculocutaneous flap. Am J Surg. 1993;166(3):279–83.PubMed
76.
Noguchi M, Minami M, Earashi M, et al. Oncologic and cosmetic outcome in patients with breast cancer treated with wide excision, transposition of adipose tissue with latissimus dorsi muscle, and axillary dissection followed by radiotherapy. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 1995;35(2):163–71.PubMed
77.
Papp C, Wechselberger G, Schoeller T. Autologous breast reconstruction after breast-conserving cancer surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1998;102(6):1932–6; discussion 1937–8.
78.
Roostaeian J, Pavone L, Da Lio A, Lipa J, Festekjian J, Crisera C. Immediate placement of implants in breast reconstruction: patient selection and outcomes. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;127(4):1407–16.PubMed
79.
Roostaeian J, Sanchez I, Vardanian A, et al. Comparison of immediate implant placement versus the staged tissue expander technique in breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;129(6):909e–18e.PubMed
80.
Spear SL, Onyewu C. Staged breast reconstruction with saline-filled implants in the irradiated breast: recent trends and therapeutic implications. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000;105(3):930–42.PubMed
81.
Spear SL, Ducic I, Low M, Cuoco F. The effect of radiation on pedicled TRAM flap breast reconstruction: outcomes and implications. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005;115(1):84–95.PubMed
82.
Spear SL, Newman MK, Bedford MS, Schwartz KA, Cohen M, Schwartz JS. A retrospective analysis of outcomes using three common methods for immediate breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;122(2):340–7.PubMed
83.
Spear SL, Schwarz KA, Venturi ML, Barbosa T, Al-Attar A. Prophylactic mastectomy and reconstruction: clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;122(1):1–9.PubMed
84.
Spear SL, Slack C, Howard MA. Postmastectomy reconstruction of the previously augmented breast: diagnosis, staging, methodology, and outcome. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001;107(5):1167–76.PubMed
85.
Tallet AV, Salem N, Moutardier V, et al. Radiotherapy and immediate two-stage breast reconstruction with a tissue expander and implant: complications and esthetic results. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2003;57(1):136–42.PubMed
86.
Tzafetta K, Ahmed O, Bahia H, Jerwood D, Ramakrishnan V. Evaluation of the factors related to postmastectomy breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001;107(7):1694–701.PubMed
87.
Vrieling C, Collette L, Fourquet A, et al. The influence of patient, tumor and treatment factors on the cosmetic results after breast-conserving therapy in the EORTC ‘boost vs. no boost’ trial. EORTC Radiotherapy and Breast Cancer Cooperative Groups. Radiother Oncol. 2000;55(3):219–32.PubMed
88.
Clough KB, Cuminet J, Fitoussi A, Nos C, Mosseri V. Cosmetic sequelae after conservative treatment for breast cancer: classification and results of surgical correction. Ann Plast Surg. 1998;41(5):471–81.PubMed
89.
Clough KB, O’Donoghue JM, Fitoussi AD, Vlastos G, Falcou MC. Prospective evaluation of late cosmetic results following breast reconstruction: II. Tram flap reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001;107(7):1710–6.PubMed
90.
Cordeiro PG, McCarthy CM. A single surgeon’s 12-year experience with tissue expander/implant breast reconstruction: part II. An analysis of long-term complications, aesthetic outcomes, and patient satisfaction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;118(4):832–9.PubMed
91.
Elton C, Jones SE, Jones PA. Initial experience of intramammary prostheses in breast conservation surgery. Eur J Surg Oncol. 1999;25(2):138–41.PubMed
92.
Evans AA, Straker VF, Rainsbury RM. Breast reconstruction at a district general hospital. J R Soc Med. 1993;86(11):630–3.PubMedCentralPubMed
93.
Hayes AJ, Jenkins MP, Sandhu SS, Baum M. Subpectoral breast reconstruction using the biodimensional system. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1997;79(5):355–60.PubMedCentralPubMed
94.
Lossing C, Elander A, Gewalli F, Holmstrom H. The lateral thoracodorsal flap in breast reconstruction: a long-term follow up study. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 2001;35(2):183–92.PubMed
95.
McCarthy CM, Pusic AL, Disa JJ, McCormick BL, Montgomery LL, Cordeiro PG. Unilateral postoperative chest wall radiotherapy in bilateral tissue expander/implant reconstruction patients: a prospective outcomes analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005;116(6):1642–7.PubMed
96.
McKeown DJ, Hogg FJ, Brown IM, Walker MJ, Scott JR, Weiler-Mithoff EM. The timing of autologous latissimus dorsi breast reconstruction and effect of radiotherapy on outcome. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2009;62(4):488–93.PubMed
97.
Moran SL, Nava G, Behnam AB, Serletti JM. An outcome analysis comparing the thoracodorsal and internal mammary vessels as recipient sites for microvascular breast reconstruction: a prospective study of 100 patients. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003;111(6):1876–82.PubMed
98.
Nano MT, Gill PG, Kollias J, Bochner MA. Breast volume replacement using the latissimus dorsi miniflap. ANZ J Surg. 2004;74(3):98–104.PubMed
99.
Nano MT, Gill PG, Kollias J, Bochner MA, Malycha P, Winefield HR. Psychological impact and cosmetic outcome of surgical breast cancer strategies. ANZ J Surg. 2005;75(11):940–7.PubMed
100.
Raja MA, Straker VF, Rainsbury RM. Extending the role of breast-conserving surgery by immediate volume replacement. Br J Surg. 1997;84(1):101–5.PubMed
101.
Ringberg A, Tengrup I, Aspegren K, Palmer B. Immediate breast reconstruction after mastectomy for cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol. 1999;25(5):470–6.PubMed
102.
Spear SL, Parikh PM, Reisin E, Menon NG. Acellular dermis-assisted breast reconstruction. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2008;32(3):418–25.PubMed
103.
Carlson GW, Page AL, Peters K, Ashinoff R, Schaefer T, Losken A. Effects of radiation therapy on pedicled transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg. 2008;60(5):568–72.PubMed
104.
Denewer A, Setit A, Hussein O, Farouk O. Skin-sparing mastectomy with immediate breast reconstruction by a new modification of extended latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap. World J Surg. 2008;32(12):2586–92.PubMed
105.
Denewer A, Farouk O. Can nipple-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction with modified extended latissimus dorsi muscular flap improve the cosmetic and functional outcome among patients with breast carcinoma? World J Surg. 2007;31(6):1169–77.PubMed
106.
Gerber B, Krause A, Dieterich M, Kundt G, Reimer T. The oncological safety of skin sparing mastectomy with conservation of the nipple-areola complex and autologous reconstruction: an extended follow-up study. Ann Surg. 2009;249(3):461–8.PubMed
107.
Gerber B, Krause A, Reimer T, et al. Skin-sparing mastectomy with conservation of the nipple-areola complex and autologous reconstruction is an oncologically safe procedure. Ann Surg. 2003;238(1):120–7.PubMedCentralPubMed
108.
Giacalone PL, Rathat G, Daures JP, Benos P, Azria D, Rouleau C. New concept for immediate breast reconstruction for invasive cancers: feasibility, oncological safety and esthetic outcome of post-neoadjuvant therapy immediate breast reconstruction versus delayed breast reconstruction: a prospective pilot study. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2010;122(2):439–51.PubMed
109.
Li FC, Jiang HC, Li J. Immediate breast reconstruction with implants after skin-sparing mastectomy: a report of 96 cases. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2010;34(6):705–10.PubMed
110.
Mori H, Umeda T, Osanai T, Hata Y. Esthetic evaluation of immediate breast reconstruction after nipple-sparing or skin-sparing mastectomy. Breast Cancer. 2005;12(4):299–303.PubMed
111.
Omranipour R, Bobin JY, Esouyeh M. Skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction (SSMIR) for early breast cancer: eight years single institution experience. World J Surg Oncol. 2008;6:43.PubMedCentralPubMed
112.
Salgarello M, Visconti G, Barone-Adesi L. Nipple-sparing mastectomy with immediate implant reconstruction: cosmetic outcomes and technical refinements. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;126(5):1460–71.PubMed
113.
Yueh JH, Houlihan MJ, Slavin SA, Lee BT, Pories SE, Morris DJ. Nipple-sparing mastectomy: evaluation of patient satisfaction, aesthetic results, and sensation. Ann Plast Surg. 2009;62(5):586–90.PubMed
114.
Berrino P, Campora E, Leone S, Zappi L, Nicosia F, Santi P. The transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flap for breast reconstruction in obese patients. Ann Plast Surg. 1991;27(3):221–31.PubMed
115.
Bogetti P, Cravero L, Spagnoli G, et al. Aesthetic role of the surgically rebuilt inframammary fold for implant-based breast reconstruction after mastectomy. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2007;60(11):1225–32.PubMed
116.
Cordeiro PG, Pusic AL, Disa JJ, McCormick B, VanZee K. Irradiation after immediate tissue expander/implant breast reconstruction: outcomes, complications, aesthetic results, and satisfaction among 156 patients. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004;113(3):877–81.PubMed
117.
Di G-H, Yu K-D, Wu J, et al. Immediate breast reconstruction with latissimus dorsi musculocutaneous flap: A suitable option for Chinese women after mastectomy. Chin J Cancer Res. 2006 2006;18(2):5.
118.
Dian D, Schwenn K, Mylonas I, Janni W, Jaenicke F, Friese K. Aesthetic result among breast cancer patients undergoing autologous breast reconstruction versus breast conserving therapy. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2007;275(6):445–50.PubMed
119.
Enajat M, Rozen WM, Whitaker IS, Smit JM, Van Der Hulst RR, Acosta R. The deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap for autologous reconstruction of large partial mastectomy defects. Microsurgery. 2011;31(1):12–7.PubMed
120.
Lee JW, Chang TW. Extended latissimus dorsi musculocutaneous flap for breast reconstruction: experience in Oriental patients. Br J Plast Surg. 1999;52(5):365–72.PubMed
121.
Tomita K, Yano K, Matsuda K, Takada A, Hosokawa K. Esthetic outcome of immediate reconstruction with latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap after breast-conservative surgery and skin-sparing mastectomy. Ann Plast Surg. 2008;61(1):19–23.PubMed
122.
Ueda S, Tamaki Y, Yano K, et al. Cosmetic outcome and patient satisfaction after skin-sparing mastectomy for breast cancer with immediate reconstruction of the breast. Surgery. 2008;143(3):414–25.PubMed
123.
Ziswiler-Gietz J, Makrodimou M, Harder Y, Banic A, Erni D. Outcome analysis of breast reconstruction with free transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous (TRAM) flaps. Swiss Med Wkly. 2008;138(7-8):114–20.PubMed
124.
Gendy RK, Able JA, Rainsbury RM. Impact of skin-sparing mastectomy with immediate reconstruction and breast-sparing reconstruction with miniflaps on the outcomes of oncoplastic breast surgery. Br J Surg. 2003;90(4):433–9.PubMed
125.
Adams WP, Jr., Rios JL, Smith SJ. Enhancing patient outcomes in aesthetic and reconstructive breast surgery using triple antibiotic breast irrigation: six-year prospective clinical study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;117(1):30–6.PubMed
126.
Aristei C, Falcinelli L, Bini V, et al. Expander/implant breast reconstruction before radiotherapy: outcomes in a single-institute cohort. Strahlenther Onkol. 2012;188(12):1074–9.PubMed
127.
Behranwala KA, Dua RS, Ross GM, Ward A, A’Hern R, Gui GP. The influence of radiotherapy on capsule formation and aesthetic outcome after immediate breast reconstruction using biodimensional anatomical expander implants. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2006;59(10):1043–51.PubMed
128.
De Lorenzi F, Lohsiriwat V, Barbieri B, et al. Immediate breast reconstruction with prostheses after conservative treatment plus intraoperative radiotherapy. long term esthetic and oncological outcomes. Breast. 2012;21(3):374–9.PubMed
129.
Rietjens M, De Lorenzi F, Venturino M, Petit JY. The suspension technique to avoid the use of tissue expanders in breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg. 2005;54(5):467–70.PubMed
130.
Castello JR, Garro L, Najera A, Mirelis E, Sanchez-Olaso A, Barros J. Immediate breast reconstruction in two stages using anatomical tissue expansion. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 2000;34(2):167–71.PubMed
131.
Cocquyt VF, Blondeel PN, Depypere HT, et al. Better cosmetic results and comparable quality of life after skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate autologous breast reconstruction compared to breast conservative treatment. Br J Plast Surg. 2003;56(5):462–70.PubMed
132.
Hayes AJ, Garner JP, Nicholas W, Laidlaw IJ. A comparative study of envelope mastectomy and immediate reconstruction (EMIR) with standard latissimus dorsi immediate breast reconstruction. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2004;30(7):744–9.PubMed
133.
Hernanz F, Regano S, Redondo-Figuero C, Orallo V, Erasun F, Gomez-Fleitas M. Oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery: analysis of quadrantectomy and immediate reconstruction with latissimus dorsi flap. World J Surg. 2007;31(10):1934–40.PubMed
134.
Anderson PR, Hanlon AL, Fowble BL, McNeeley SW, Freedman GM. Low complication rates are achievable after postmastectomy breast reconstruction and radiation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004;59(4):1080–7.PubMed
135.
Baschnagel AM, Shah C, Wilkinson JB, Dekhne N, Arthur DW, Vicini FA. Failure rate and cosmesis of immediate tissue expander/implant breast reconstruction after postmastectomy irradiation. Clin Breast Cancer. 2012;12(6):428–32.PubMed
136.
Bassiouny M, El-Marakby HH, Saber N, Zayed SB, Shokry A. Quadrantectomy and nipple saving mastectomy in treatment of early breast cancer: feasibility and aesthetic results of adjunctive latissmus dorsi breast reconstruction. J Egypt Natl Canc Inst. 2005;17(3):149–57.PubMed
137.
Cassileth L, Kohanzadeh S, Amersi F. One-stage immediate breast reconstruction with implants: a new option for immediate reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg. 2012;69(2):134–8.PubMed
138.
Zaha H, Onomura M, Nomura H, Umekawa K, Oki M, Asato H. Free omental flap for partial breast reconstruction after breast-conserving surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;129(3):583–7.PubMed
139.
Fernandez Delgado JM, Martinez-Mendez JR, de Santiago J, Hernandez-Cortes G, Casado C. Immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) with direct, anatomic, extra-projection prosthesis: 102 cases. Ann Plast Surg. 2007;58(1):99–104.PubMed
140.
Hudson DA, Skoll PJ. Single-stage, autologous breast restoration. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001;108(5):1163–71; discussion 1172–3.
141.
Margulies AG, Hochberg J, Kepple J, Henry-Tillman RS, Westbrook K, Klimberg VS. Total skin-sparing mastectomy without preservation of the nipple-areola complex. Am J Surg. 2005;190(6):907–12.PubMed
142.
Sacchini V, Pinotti JA, Barros AC, et al. Nipple-sparing mastectomy for breast cancer and risk reduction: oncologic or technical problem? J Am Coll Surg. 2006;203(5):704–14.PubMed
143.
Spear SL, Davison SP. Aesthetic subunits of the breast. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003;112(2):440–7.PubMed
144.
Eriksen C, Lindgren EN, Frisell J, Stark B. A prospective randomized study comparing two different expander approaches in implant-based breast reconstruction: one stage versus two stages. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;130(2):254e–64e.PubMed
145.
Edsander-Nord A, Brandberg Y, Wickman M. Quality of life, patients’ satisfaction, and aesthetic outcome after pedicled or free TRAM flap breast surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001;107(5):1142–53; discussion 1154–5.
146.
Gahm J, Jurell G, Edsander-Nord A, Wickman M. Patient satisfaction with aesthetic outcome after bilateral prophylactic mastectomy and immediate reconstruction with implants. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2010;63(2):332–8.PubMed
147.
Cohen BE, Casso D, Whetstone M. Analysis of risks and aesthetics in a consecutive series of tissue expansion breast reconstructions. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1992;89(5):840–3; discussion 844–5.
148.
Lindegren A, Halle M, Docherty Skogh AC, Edsander-Nord A. Postmastectomy breast reconstruction in the irradiated breast: a comparative study of DIEP and latissimus dorsi flap outcome. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;130(1):10–8.PubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Systematic Review: Aesthetic Assessment of Breast Reconstruction Outcomes by Healthcare Professionals
verfasst von
Saskia W. M. C. Maass, MD
Shaghayegh Bagher, MSc
Stefan O. P. Hofer, MD, PhD
Nancy N. Baxter, MD, PhD
Toni Zhong, MD, MHS
Publikationsdatum
01.12.2015
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Ausgabe 13/2015
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Elektronische ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-015-4434-2

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 13/2015

Annals of Surgical Oncology 13/2015 Zur Ausgabe

Thoracic Oncology

Salvage Esophagectomy After Definitive Chemoradiotherapy for Patients with Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Who Really Benefits from this High-Risk Surgery?

Hepatobiliary Tumors

Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI) Predicts Tumor Recurrence of Very Early/Early Stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma After Surgical Resection

Colorectal Cancer

Immunohistochemical Evaluation of Minichromosome Maintenance Protein 7 (MCM7), Topoisomerase IIα, and Ki-67 in Diffuse Malignant Peritoneal Mesothelioma Patients Using Tissue Microarray

Gastrointestinal Oncology

Reconstruction Using a Pedunculated Gastric Tube with Duodenal Transection After Esophagectomy and Pharyngolaryngectomy

Hepatobiliary Tumors

Biphenotypic Primary Liver Carcinomas: Assessing Outcomes of Hepatic Directed Therapy

Breast Oncology

Prognostic Significance of Tumor-Positive Internal Mammary Sentinel Lymph Nodes in Breast Cancer: A Multicenter Cohort Study

Neu im Fachgebiet Chirurgie

17.04.2024 | Postoperative nausea and vomiting | Nachrichten

Hochrisiko-Eingriffe für postoperative Übelkeit

16.04.2024 | HNO-Chirurgie | Nachrichten

HNO-Op. auch mit über 90?

16.04.2024 | Infektiologie | Nachrichten

Kein Abstrich bei chronischen Wunden ohne Entzündungszeichen!

10.04.2024 | Postoperative Schmerztherapie | Nachrichten

Chronische Schmerzen nach Op. oft mit neuropathischer Komponente
weitere anzeigen

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Aktuelle BDC Leitlinien-Webinare

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom CME-Kurs
CME: 2 Punkte

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur CME-Kurs
CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht, PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske Das Webinar S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“ beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis CME-Kurs
CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.