Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 8/2016

10.03.2016 | Colorectal Cancer

Patterns of Referral for Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Stage II and III Colon Cancer: A Population-Based Study

verfasst von: Gursimran Chandhoke, MD, Xuejiao Wei, MSc, Sulaiman Nanji, MD, PhD, James Biagi, MD, Yingwei Peng, PhD, Monika Krzyzanowska, MD, William J. Mackillop, MBChB, Christopher M. Booth, MD

Erschienen in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Ausgabe 8/2016

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

Reasons for variable utilization of adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) for colon cancer have not been well described. We report medical oncology (MO) referral patterns and subsequent use of ACT.

Methods

Treatment records were linked to the population-based Ontario Cancer Registry to describe MO referral and ACT use among 5289 patients with stage II–III colon cancer treated in 2002–2008. Modified Poisson regression was used to analyze factors associated with MO referral and ACT use. Multilevel modeling was used to explore the proportion of variation in practice attributable to providers.

Results

There was wide geographic variation in MO referral rates for stage II (range 37–80 %, p < 0.001) and stage III disease (range 77–98 %, p < 0.001). Use of ACT among referred patients varied across regions for stage II (range 12–49 %, p < 0.001) but not stage III (range 67–79 %, p = 0.353). For both stages, younger patients (p < 0.001) with less comorbidity (p < 0.010) were more likely to be referred to MO and treated with ACT. Applying the fitted regression model to nonreferred stage III patients suggests that 38 % had >50 % probability of having ACT if they had seen a MO. Among stage III patients, 15 % percent of the variance in MO referral rate and 6 % of the variance in ACT utilization rate is attributable to the surgeon and MO respectively.

Conclusions

A substantial proportion of non-referred patients with stage III colon cancer may have been offered ACT if they had seen MO. A small proportion of variance in referral rate and ACT treatment is attributable to providers.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Labianca R, Nordlinger B, Beretta GD, et al.: Early colon cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 24(Suppl 6):vi64–vi72, 2013.CrossRefPubMed Labianca R, Nordlinger B, Beretta GD, et al.: Early colon cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 24(Suppl 6):vi64–vi72, 2013.CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat National Comprehensive Cancer Network: NCCN Guidelines Colon Cancer, 2015. National Comprehensive Cancer Network: NCCN Guidelines Colon Cancer, 2015.
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Jonker DJ, Spithoff K, Maroun J: Adjuvant systemic chemotherapy for Stage II and III colon cancer after complete resection: an updated practice guideline. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 23:314–322, 2011.CrossRef Jonker DJ, Spithoff K, Maroun J: Adjuvant systemic chemotherapy for Stage II and III colon cancer after complete resection: an updated practice guideline. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 23:314–322, 2011.CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Chagpar R, Xing Y, Chiang YJ, et al.: Adherence to stage-specific treatment guidelines for patients with colon cancer. J Clin Oncol 30:972–979, 2012.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Chagpar R, Xing Y, Chiang YJ, et al.: Adherence to stage-specific treatment guidelines for patients with colon cancer. J Clin Oncol 30:972–979, 2012.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Sanoff HK, Carpenter WR, Sturmer T, et al.: Effect of adjuvant chemotherapy on survival of patients with stage III colon cancer diagnosed after age 75 years. J Clin Oncol 30:2624–2634, 2012.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Sanoff HK, Carpenter WR, Sturmer T, et al.: Effect of adjuvant chemotherapy on survival of patients with stage III colon cancer diagnosed after age 75 years. J Clin Oncol 30:2624–2634, 2012.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Winget M, Hossain S, Yasui Y, et al.: Characteristics of patients with stage III colon adenocarcinoma who fail to receive guideline-recommended treatment. Cancer 116:4849–4856, 2010.CrossRefPubMed Winget M, Hossain S, Yasui Y, et al.: Characteristics of patients with stage III colon adenocarcinoma who fail to receive guideline-recommended treatment. Cancer 116:4849–4856, 2010.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Murphy CC, Harlan LC, Lund JL, et al.: Patterns of Colorectal Cancer Care in the United States: 1990–2010. J Natl Cancer Inst 107(10):djv198, 2015.CrossRefPubMed Murphy CC, Harlan LC, Lund JL, et al.: Patterns of Colorectal Cancer Care in the United States: 1990–2010. J Natl Cancer Inst 107(10):djv198, 2015.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Luo R, Giordano SH, Freeman JL, et al.: Referral to medical oncology: a crucial step in the treatment of older patients with stage III colon cancer. Oncologist 11:1025–1033, 2006.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Luo R, Giordano SH, Freeman JL, et al.: Referral to medical oncology: a crucial step in the treatment of older patients with stage III colon cancer. Oncologist 11:1025–1033, 2006.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Luo R, Giordano SH, Zhang DD, et al.: The role of the surgeon in whether patients with lymph node-positive colon cancer see a medical oncologist. Cancer 109:975–982, 2007.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Luo R, Giordano SH, Zhang DD, et al.: The role of the surgeon in whether patients with lymph node-positive colon cancer see a medical oncologist. Cancer 109:975–982, 2007.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Rayson D, Urquhart R, Cox M, et al.: Adherence to clinical practice guidelines for adjuvant chemotherapy for colorectal cancer in a Canadian province: a population-based analysis. J Oncol Pract 8:253–259, 2012.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Rayson D, Urquhart R, Cox M, et al.: Adherence to clinical practice guidelines for adjuvant chemotherapy for colorectal cancer in a Canadian province: a population-based analysis. J Oncol Pract 8:253–259, 2012.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Baldwin LM, Dobie SA, Billingsley K, et al.: Explaining black-white differences in receipt of recommended colon cancer treatment. J Natl Cancer Inst 97:1211–1220, 2005.CrossRefPubMed Baldwin LM, Dobie SA, Billingsley K, et al.: Explaining black-white differences in receipt of recommended colon cancer treatment. J Natl Cancer Inst 97:1211–1220, 2005.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Davidoff AJ, Rapp T, Onukwugha E, et al.: Trends in disparities in receipt of adjuvant therapy for elderly stage III colon cancer patients: the role of the medical oncologist evaluation. Med Care 47:1229–1236, 2009.CrossRefPubMed Davidoff AJ, Rapp T, Onukwugha E, et al.: Trends in disparities in receipt of adjuvant therapy for elderly stage III colon cancer patients: the role of the medical oncologist evaluation. Med Care 47:1229–1236, 2009.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Clarke EA, Marrett LD, Krieger N: Cancer registration in Ontario: A computer approach., in Jenson OM, Parkin DM, MacLennan R (eds): Cancer Registration Principles and Methods. Lyon,France, IARC, 1991, pp 246–257. Clarke EA, Marrett LD, Krieger N: Cancer registration in Ontario: A computer approach., in Jenson OM, Parkin DM, MacLennan R (eds): Cancer Registration Principles and Methods. Lyon,France, IARC, 1991, pp 246–257.
15.
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Mackillop WJ, Zhang-Salomons J, Groome PA, et al.: Socioeconomic status and cancer survival in Ontario. J Clin Oncol 15:1680–1689, 1997.PubMed Mackillop WJ, Zhang-Salomons J, Groome PA, et al.: Socioeconomic status and cancer survival in Ontario. J Clin Oncol 15:1680–1689, 1997.PubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Deyo RA, Cherkin DC, Ciol MA: Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative databases. J Clin Epidemiol 45:613–619, 1992.CrossRefPubMed Deyo RA, Cherkin DC, Ciol MA: Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative databases. J Clin Epidemiol 45:613–619, 1992.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Kankesan J, Shepherd FA, Peng Y, et al.: Factors associated with referral to medical oncology and subsequent use of adjuvant chemotherapy for non-small-cell lung cancer: a population-based study. Curr Oncol 20:30–37, 2013.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kankesan J, Shepherd FA, Peng Y, et al.: Factors associated with referral to medical oncology and subsequent use of adjuvant chemotherapy for non-small-cell lung cancer: a population-based study. Curr Oncol 20:30–37, 2013.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Snijders T.A.B, Bosker RJ: Multilevel Analysis: An introduction to basic and advacned multilevel modelling. 2 ed. London: Sage Publishers, 2011. Snijders T.A.B, Bosker RJ: Multilevel Analysis: An introduction to basic and advacned multilevel modelling. 2 ed. London: Sage Publishers, 2011.
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Mackillop WJ: Health services research in radiation oncology. In: Gunderson LL, Tepper JE, editors. Clinical radiation oncology, 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Churchill Livingstone, 2012, p. 203–222.CrossRef Mackillop WJ: Health services research in radiation oncology. In: Gunderson LL, Tepper JE, editors. Clinical radiation oncology, 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Churchill Livingstone, 2012, p. 203–222.CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Krzyzanowska MK, Regan MM, Powell M, et al.: Impact of patient age and comorbidity on surgeon versus oncologist preferences for adjuvant chemotherapy for stage III colon cancer. J Am Coll Surg 208:202–209, 2009.CrossRefPubMed Krzyzanowska MK, Regan MM, Powell M, et al.: Impact of patient age and comorbidity on surgeon versus oncologist preferences for adjuvant chemotherapy for stage III colon cancer. J Am Coll Surg 208:202–209, 2009.CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Booth CM, Mackillop WJ: Translating new medical therapies into societal benefit: the role of population-based outcome studies. JAMA 300:2177–2179, 2008.CrossRefPubMed Booth CM, Mackillop WJ: Translating new medical therapies into societal benefit: the role of population-based outcome studies. JAMA 300:2177–2179, 2008.CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Patterns of Referral for Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Stage II and III Colon Cancer: A Population-Based Study
verfasst von
Gursimran Chandhoke, MD
Xuejiao Wei, MSc
Sulaiman Nanji, MD, PhD
James Biagi, MD
Yingwei Peng, PhD
Monika Krzyzanowska, MD
William J. Mackillop, MBChB
Christopher M. Booth, MD
Publikationsdatum
10.03.2016
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Ausgabe 8/2016
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Elektronische ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-016-5181-8

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 8/2016

Annals of Surgical Oncology 8/2016 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

CME: 2 Punkte

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht, PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske Das Webinar S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“ beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.