Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 4/2017

24.10.2016 | Hepatobiliary Tumors

Robotic Versus Open Hepatectomy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Matched Comparison

verfasst von: Po-Da Chen, MD, Chao-Ying Wu, MD, Rey-Heng Hu, MD, PhD, Wei-Han Chou, MD, Hong-Shiee Lai, MD, PhD, Jin-Tung Liang, MD, PhD, Po-Huang Lee, MD, PhD, Yao-Ming Wu, MD, PhD

Erschienen in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Ausgabe 4/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Robotic hepatectomy has been suggested to be a safe and effective approach for liver disease; however, studies comparing robotic hepatectomy with the conventional open approach regarding oncologic outcomes for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are limited. Accordingly, we performed a matched comparison of surgical and oncological outcomes between robotic and open hepatectomy.

Methods

Between January 2012 and October 2015, a total of 183 patients underwent robotic hepatectomy and 275 patients underwent open hepatectomy by the same surgical team in our center. Eighty-one newly diagnosed HCC cases in each group were compared under propensity score matching (PSM) in a 1:1 ratio.

Results

With robotic hepatectomy, the conversion rate was 1.6 % and the complication rate was 4.4 %. On PSM, the groups had a comparable percentage of major liver resections (41.9 vs. 39.5 %) and liver cirrhosis (45.7 vs. 46.9 %). Compared with the open group, the robotic group required longer operation times (343 vs. 220 min), shorter hospital stays (7.5 vs. 10.1 days), and lower dosages of postoperative patient-controlled analgesia (350 vs. 554 ng/kg). The 3-year disease-free survival of the robotic group was comparable with that of the open group (72.2 % vs. 58.0 %; p = 0.062), as was the 3-year overall survival (92.6 vs. 93.7 %; p = 0.431).

Conclusions

This is the first oncological study comparing robotic liver resection for HCC with open resection. Robotic hepatectomy can be applied for challenging major resections in patients with cirrhotic liver disease with less postoperative pain and shorter hospital stays without compromising oncological outcomes.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Mendivil AA, Rettenmaier MA, Abaid LN, Brown JV 3rd, Micha JP, Lopez KL, et al. Survival rate comparisons amongst cervical cancer patients treated with an open, robotic-assisted or laparoscopic radical hysterectomy: a five year experience. Surg Oncol. 2016;25(1):66–71.CrossRefPubMed Mendivil AA, Rettenmaier MA, Abaid LN, Brown JV 3rd, Micha JP, Lopez KL, et al. Survival rate comparisons amongst cervical cancer patients treated with an open, robotic-assisted or laparoscopic radical hysterectomy: a five year experience. Surg Oncol. 2016;25(1):66–71.CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Allan C, Ilic D. Laparoscopic versus robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy for the treatment of localised prostate cancer: a systematic review. Urol Int. 2016;96(4):373–78.CrossRefPubMed Allan C, Ilic D. Laparoscopic versus robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy for the treatment of localised prostate cancer: a systematic review. Urol Int. 2016;96(4):373–78.CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee WJ, Wang W, Chen TC, Chen JC, Ser KH. Totally laparoscopic radical BII gastrectomy for the treatment of gastric cancer: a comparison with open surgery. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2008;18:369–74.CrossRefPubMed Lee WJ, Wang W, Chen TC, Chen JC, Ser KH. Totally laparoscopic radical BII gastrectomy for the treatment of gastric cancer: a comparison with open surgery. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2008;18:369–74.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Lim DR, Min BS, Kim MS, et al. Robotic versus laparoscopic anterior resection of sigmoid colon cancer: comparative study of long-term oncologic outcomes. Surg Endosc. 2013;27:1379–85.CrossRefPubMed Lim DR, Min BS, Kim MS, et al. Robotic versus laparoscopic anterior resection of sigmoid colon cancer: comparative study of long-term oncologic outcomes. Surg Endosc. 2013;27:1379–85.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Clavien PA, Barkun J. Consensus conference on laparoscopic liver resection: a jury-based evaluation. Ann Surg. 2015;261:630–31.CrossRefPubMed Clavien PA, Barkun J. Consensus conference on laparoscopic liver resection: a jury-based evaluation. Ann Surg. 2015;261:630–31.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Tranchart H, Diop PS, Lainas P, Pourcher G, Catherine L, Franco D, et al. Laparoscopic major hepatectomy can be safely performed with colorectal surgery for synchronous colorectal liver metastasis. HPB. 2011;13:46–50.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Tranchart H, Diop PS, Lainas P, Pourcher G, Catherine L, Franco D, et al. Laparoscopic major hepatectomy can be safely performed with colorectal surgery for synchronous colorectal liver metastasis. HPB. 2011;13:46–50.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Nomi T, Fuks D, Kawaguchi Y, Mal F, Nakajima Y, Gayet B. Learning curve for laparoscopic major hepatectomy. Br J Surg. 2015;102:796–804.CrossRefPubMed Nomi T, Fuks D, Kawaguchi Y, Mal F, Nakajima Y, Gayet B. Learning curve for laparoscopic major hepatectomy. Br J Surg. 2015;102:796–804.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Antoniou SA, Andreou A, Antoniou GA, et al. Volume and methodological quality of randomized controlled trials in laparoscopic surgery: assessment over a 10-year period. Am J Surg. 2015;210(5):922–29.CrossRefPubMed Antoniou SA, Andreou A, Antoniou GA, et al. Volume and methodological quality of randomized controlled trials in laparoscopic surgery: assessment over a 10-year period. Am J Surg. 2015;210(5):922–29.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Jackson NR, Hauch A, Hu T, Buell JF, Slakey DP, Kandil E. The safety and efficacy of approaches to liver resection: a meta-analysis. JSLS. 2015;19:e2014 00186.PubMed Jackson NR, Hauch A, Hu T, Buell JF, Slakey DP, Kandil E. The safety and efficacy of approaches to liver resection: a meta-analysis. JSLS. 2015;19:e2014 00186.PubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim H, Suh KS, Lee KW, et al. Long-term outcome of laparoscopic versus open liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: a case-controlled study with propensity score matching. Surg Endosc. 2014;28:950–60.CrossRefPubMed Kim H, Suh KS, Lee KW, et al. Long-term outcome of laparoscopic versus open liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: a case-controlled study with propensity score matching. Surg Endosc. 2014;28:950–60.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Han HS, Cho JY, Yoon YS, Hwang DW, Kim YK, Shin HK, et al. Total laparoscopic living donor right hepatectomy. Surg Endosc. 2015;29:184.CrossRefPubMed Han HS, Cho JY, Yoon YS, Hwang DW, Kim YK, Shin HK, et al. Total laparoscopic living donor right hepatectomy. Surg Endosc. 2015;29:184.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Nguyen KT, Gamblin TC, Geller DA. World review of laparoscopic liver resection - 2804 patients. Ann Surg. 2009;250:831–41.CrossRefPubMed Nguyen KT, Gamblin TC, Geller DA. World review of laparoscopic liver resection - 2804 patients. Ann Surg. 2009;250:831–41.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Yin Z, Fan X, Ye H, Yin D, Wang J. Short- and long-term outcomes after laparoscopic and open hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma: a global systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20:1203–15.CrossRefPubMed Yin Z, Fan X, Ye H, Yin D, Wang J. Short- and long-term outcomes after laparoscopic and open hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma: a global systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20:1203–15.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Giulianotti PC, Coratti A, Angelini M, Sbrana F, Cecconi S, Balestracci T, et al. Robotics in general surgery: personal experience in a large community hospital. Arch Surg. 2003;138:777–84.CrossRefPubMed Giulianotti PC, Coratti A, Angelini M, Sbrana F, Cecconi S, Balestracci T, et al. Robotics in general surgery: personal experience in a large community hospital. Arch Surg. 2003;138:777–84.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Liang JT, Lai HS. Surgical technique of robotic D3 lymph node dissection around the inferior mesenteric artery with preservation of the left colic artery and autonomic nerves for the treatment of distal rectal cancer. Surg Endosc. 2014;28:1727–33.CrossRefPubMed Liang JT, Lai HS. Surgical technique of robotic D3 lymph node dissection around the inferior mesenteric artery with preservation of the left colic artery and autonomic nerves for the treatment of distal rectal cancer. Surg Endosc. 2014;28:1727–33.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Tsung A, Geller DA, Sukato DC, et al. Robotic versus laparoscopic hepatectomy: a matched comparison. Ann Surg. 2014;259:549–55.CrossRefPubMed Tsung A, Geller DA, Sukato DC, et al. Robotic versus laparoscopic hepatectomy: a matched comparison. Ann Surg. 2014;259:549–55.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Montalti R, Patriti A, Troisi RI. Robotic versus laparoscopic hepatectomy: what is the best minimally invasive approach? Ann Surg. 2015;262:e70.CrossRefPubMed Montalti R, Patriti A, Troisi RI. Robotic versus laparoscopic hepatectomy: what is the best minimally invasive approach? Ann Surg. 2015;262:e70.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Lai EC, Yang GP, Tang CN. Robot-assisted laparoscopic liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: short-term outcome. Am J Surg. 2013;205:697–702.CrossRefPubMed Lai EC, Yang GP, Tang CN. Robot-assisted laparoscopic liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: short-term outcome. Am J Surg. 2013;205:697–702.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Wu YM, Hu RH, Lai HS, Lee PH. Robotic-assisted minimally invasive liver resection. Asian J Surg. 2014;37:53–7.CrossRefPubMed Wu YM, Hu RH, Lai HS, Lee PH. Robotic-assisted minimally invasive liver resection. Asian J Surg. 2014;37:53–7.CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Giulianotti PC, Sbrana F, Coratti A, et al. Totally robotic right hepatectomy: surgical technique and outcomes. Arch Surg. 2011;146:844–50.CrossRefPubMed Giulianotti PC, Sbrana F, Coratti A, et al. Totally robotic right hepatectomy: surgical technique and outcomes. Arch Surg. 2011;146:844–50.CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim SR, Kim KH. Robotic liver resection: a single surgeon’s experience. Hepatogastroenterology. 2014;61:2062–7.PubMed Kim SR, Kim KH. Robotic liver resection: a single surgeon’s experience. Hepatogastroenterology. 2014;61:2062–7.PubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Ocuin LM, Tsung A. Robotic liver resection for malignancy: current status, oncologic outcomes, comparison to laparoscopy, and future applications. J Surg Oncol. 2015;112:295–301.CrossRefPubMed Ocuin LM, Tsung A. Robotic liver resection for malignancy: current status, oncologic outcomes, comparison to laparoscopy, and future applications. J Surg Oncol. 2015;112:295–301.CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Strasberg SM. Nomenclature of hepatic anatomy and resections: a review of the Brisbane 2000 system. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2005;12:351–5.CrossRefPubMed Strasberg SM. Nomenclature of hepatic anatomy and resections: a review of the Brisbane 2000 system. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2005;12:351–5.CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Buell JF, Cherqui D, Geller DA, et al. The international position on laparoscopic liver surgery: the Louisville Statement, 2008. Ann Surg. 2009;250:825–30.CrossRefPubMed Buell JF, Cherqui D, Geller DA, et al. The international position on laparoscopic liver surgery: the Louisville Statement, 2008. Ann Surg. 2009;250:825–30.CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240:205–13.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240:205–13.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Lin NC, Nitta H, Wakabayashi G. Laparoscopic major hepatectomy: a systematic literature review and comparison of three techniques. Ann Surg. 2013;257:205–13.CrossRefPubMed Lin NC, Nitta H, Wakabayashi G. Laparoscopic major hepatectomy: a systematic literature review and comparison of three techniques. Ann Surg. 2013;257:205–13.CrossRefPubMed
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Dagher I, Gayet B, Tzanis D, et al. International experience for laparoscopic major liver resection. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2014;21:732–6.CrossRefPubMed Dagher I, Gayet B, Tzanis D, et al. International experience for laparoscopic major liver resection. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2014;21:732–6.CrossRefPubMed
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Han XL, Wu WM, Wang MY, et al. Combination of intraoperative ultrasonography for localizing insulinoma under Da Vinci robotic surgical system: experience of a single center in 50 cases [in Chinese]. Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2016;54:30–3.PubMed Han XL, Wu WM, Wang MY, et al. Combination of intraoperative ultrasonography for localizing insulinoma under Da Vinci robotic surgical system: experience of a single center in 50 cases [in Chinese]. Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2016;54:30–3.PubMed
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Wakabayashi G, Cherqui D, Geller DA, et al. Recommendations for laparoscopic liver resection: a report from the second international consensus conference held in Morioka. Ann Surg. 2015;261:619–29.PubMed Wakabayashi G, Cherqui D, Geller DA, et al. Recommendations for laparoscopic liver resection: a report from the second international consensus conference held in Morioka. Ann Surg. 2015;261:619–29.PubMed
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Anvari M, Birch DW, Bamehriz F, Gryfe R, Chapman T. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2004;14:311–15.CrossRefPubMed Anvari M, Birch DW, Bamehriz F, Gryfe R, Chapman T. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2004;14:311–15.CrossRefPubMed
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Komatsu S, Brustia R, Goumard C, Perdigao F, Soubrane O, Scatton O. Laparoscopic versus open major hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma: a matched pair analysis. Surg Endosc. 2016;30(5):1965–74.CrossRefPubMed Komatsu S, Brustia R, Goumard C, Perdigao F, Soubrane O, Scatton O. Laparoscopic versus open major hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma: a matched pair analysis. Surg Endosc. 2016;30(5):1965–74.CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Robotic Versus Open Hepatectomy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Matched Comparison
verfasst von
Po-Da Chen, MD
Chao-Ying Wu, MD
Rey-Heng Hu, MD, PhD
Wei-Han Chou, MD
Hong-Shiee Lai, MD, PhD
Jin-Tung Liang, MD, PhD
Po-Huang Lee, MD, PhD
Yao-Ming Wu, MD, PhD
Publikationsdatum
24.10.2016
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Ausgabe 4/2017
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Elektronische ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-016-5638-9

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2017

Annals of Surgical Oncology 4/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.