Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 9/2017

30.05.2017 | Pancreatic Tumors

Induction Chemotherapy Followed by Resection or Irreversible Electroporation in Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer (IMPALA): A Prospective Cohort Study

verfasst von: Jantien A. Vogel, MD, MSc, Steffi J. Rombouts, MD, Thijs de Rooij, MSc, Otto M. van Delden, MD, PhD, Prof, Marcel G. Dijkgraaf, MSc, PhD, Thomas M. van Gulik, MD, PhD, Prof, Jeanin E. van Hooft, MD, PhD, MBA, Hanneke W. van Laarhoven, MD, PhD, Prof, Robert C. Martin, MD, PhD, Prof, Annuska Schoorlemmer, MSc, Johanna W. Wilmink, MD, PhD, Krijn P. van Lienden, MD, PhD, Olivier R. Busch, MD, PhD, Prof, Marc G. Besselink, MD, MSc, PhD

Erschienen in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Ausgabe 9/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Following induction chemotherapy, both resection or irreversible electroporation (IRE) may further improve survival in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC). However, prospective studies combining these strategies are currently lacking, and available studies only report on subgroups that completed treatment. This study aimed to determine the applicability and outcomes of resection and IRE in patients with nonprogressive LAPC after induction chemotherapy.

Methods

This was a prospective, single-center cohort study in consecutive patients with LAPC (September 2013 to March 2015). All patients were offered 3 months of induction chemotherapy (FOLFIRINOX or gemcitabine depending on performance status), followed by exploratory laparotomy for resection or IRE in patients with Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1 nonprogressive, IRE-eligible tumors.

Results

Of 132 patients with LAPC, 70% (n = 93) started with chemotherapy (46% [n = 61] FOLFIRINOX). After 3 months, 59 patients (64%) had nonprogressive disease, of whom 36 (27% of the entire cohort) underwent explorative laparotomy, resulting in 14 resections (11% of the entire cohort, 39% of the explored patients) and 15 IREs (11% of the entire cohort, 42% of the explored patients). After laparotomy, 44% (n = 16) of patients had Clavien–Dindo grade 3 or higher complications, and 90-day all-cause mortality was 11% (n = 4). With a median follow-up of 24 months, median overall survival after resection, IRE, and for all patients with nonprogressive disease without resection/IRE (n = 30) was 34, 16, and 15 months, respectively. The resection rate in 61 patients receiving FOLFIRINOX treatment was 20%.

Conclusion

Induction chemotherapy followed by IRE or resection in nonprogressive LAPC led to resection or IRE in 22% of all-comers, with promising survival rates after resection but no apparent benefit of IRE, despite considerable morbidity. Registered at Netherlands Trial Register (NTR4230).
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Ervik M, et al. GLOBOCAN 2012 v1.1, cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: IARC CancerBase No. 11. International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2014. Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Ervik M, et al. GLOBOCAN 2012 v1.1, cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: IARC CancerBase No. 11. International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2014.
2.
3.
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Ducreux M, Cuhna AS, Caramella C, et al. Cancer of the pancreas: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2015;26 Suppl 5:v56–68.CrossRefPubMed Ducreux M, Cuhna AS, Caramella C, et al. Cancer of the pancreas: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2015;26 Suppl 5:v56–68.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Petrelli F, Coinu A, Borgonovo K, et al. FOLFIRINOX-based neoadjuvant therapy in borderline resectable or unresectable pancreatic cancer: a meta-analytical review of published studies. Pancreas 2015;44:515–21.CrossRefPubMed Petrelli F, Coinu A, Borgonovo K, et al. FOLFIRINOX-based neoadjuvant therapy in borderline resectable or unresectable pancreatic cancer: a meta-analytical review of published studies. Pancreas 2015;44:515–21.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Suker M, Beumer BR, Sadot E, et al. FOLFIRINOX for locally advanced pancreatic cancer: a systematic review and patient-level meta-analysis. Lancet Oncol. 2016;17(6):801–10.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Suker M, Beumer BR, Sadot E, et al. FOLFIRINOX for locally advanced pancreatic cancer: a systematic review and patient-level meta-analysis. Lancet Oncol. 2016;17(6):801–10.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Rombouts SJ, Walma MS, Vogel JA, et al. Systematic review of resection rates and clinical outcomes after FOLFIRINOX-based treatment in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016;23(13):4352–60.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Rombouts SJ, Walma MS, Vogel JA, et al. Systematic review of resection rates and clinical outcomes after FOLFIRINOX-based treatment in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016;23(13):4352–60.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Rombouts SJ, Vogel JA, van Santvoort HC,et al. Systematic review of innovative ablative therapies for the treatment of locally advanced pancreatic cancer. Br J Surg. 2015;102:182–93.CrossRefPubMed Rombouts SJ, Vogel JA, van Santvoort HC,et al. Systematic review of innovative ablative therapies for the treatment of locally advanced pancreatic cancer. Br J Surg. 2015;102:182–93.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Sugar IP, Neumann E. Stochastic model for electric field-induced membrane pores electroporation. Biophys Chem. 1984;19:211–25.CrossRefPubMed Sugar IP, Neumann E. Stochastic model for electric field-induced membrane pores electroporation. Biophys Chem. 1984;19:211–25.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Beebe SJ, Fox PM, Rec LJ, et al. Nanosecond, high-intensity pulsed electric fields induce apoptosis in human cells. FASEB J. 2003;17:1493–5.PubMed Beebe SJ, Fox PM, Rec LJ, et al. Nanosecond, high-intensity pulsed electric fields induce apoptosis in human cells. FASEB J. 2003;17:1493–5.PubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Davalos RV, Mir IL, Rubinsky B. Tissue ablation with irreversible electroporation. Ann Biomed Eng. 2005;33:223–31CrossRefPubMed Davalos RV, Mir IL, Rubinsky B. Tissue ablation with irreversible electroporation. Ann Biomed Eng. 2005;33:223–31CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Miller L, Leor J, Rubinsky B. Cancer cells ablation with irreversible electroporation. Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2005;4:699–705CrossRefPubMed Miller L, Leor J, Rubinsky B. Cancer cells ablation with irreversible electroporation. Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2005;4:699–705CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Edd JF, Horowitz L, Davalos RV, et al. In vivo results of a new focal tissue ablation technique: irreversible electroporation. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2006;53:1409–15CrossRefPubMed Edd JF, Horowitz L, Davalos RV, et al. In vivo results of a new focal tissue ablation technique: irreversible electroporation. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2006;53:1409–15CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Maor E, Ivorra A, Mitchell JJ, Rubinsky B. Vascular smooth muscle cells ablation with endovascular nonthermal irreversible electroporation. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2010;21:1708–15.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Maor E, Ivorra A, Mitchell JJ, Rubinsky B. Vascular smooth muscle cells ablation with endovascular nonthermal irreversible electroporation. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2010;21:1708–15.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Maor E, Ivorra A, Leor J, Rubinsky B. The effect of irreversible electroporation on blood vessels. Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2007;6:307–12.CrossRefPubMed Maor E, Ivorra A, Leor J, Rubinsky B. The effect of irreversible electroporation on blood vessels. Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2007;6:307–12.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Narayanan G, Bhatia S, Echenique A, et al. Vessel patency post irreversible electroporation. Cardiovasc Interv Radiol. 2014;37:1523–9.CrossRef Narayanan G, Bhatia S, Echenique A, et al. Vessel patency post irreversible electroporation. Cardiovasc Interv Radiol. 2014;37:1523–9.CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Rubinsky B, Onik G, Mikus P. Irreversible electroporation: a new ablation modality–clinical implications. Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2007;6:37–48CrossRefPubMed Rubinsky B, Onik G, Mikus P. Irreversible electroporation: a new ablation modality–clinical implications. Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2007;6:37–48CrossRefPubMed
19.
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Choi JW, Lu DS, Osuagwu F, et al. Assessment of chronological effects of irreversible electroporation on hilar bile ducts in a porcine model. Cardiovasc Interv Radiol. 2014;37:224–30.CrossRef Choi JW, Lu DS, Osuagwu F, et al. Assessment of chronological effects of irreversible electroporation on hilar bile ducts in a porcine model. Cardiovasc Interv Radiol. 2014;37:224–30.CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Schoellnast H, Monette S, Ezell PC, et al. Acute and subacute effects of irreversible electroporation on nerves: experimental study in a pig model. Radiology. 2011;260:421–7.CrossRefPubMed Schoellnast H, Monette S, Ezell PC, et al. Acute and subacute effects of irreversible electroporation on nerves: experimental study in a pig model. Radiology. 2011;260:421–7.CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Schoellnast H, Monette S, Ezell PC, et al. The delayed effects of irreversible electroporation ablation on nerves. Eur Radiol. 2013;23:375–80.CrossRefPubMed Schoellnast H, Monette S, Ezell PC, et al. The delayed effects of irreversible electroporation ablation on nerves. Eur Radiol. 2013;23:375–80.CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat van Driel VJ, Neven K, van Wessel H, et al. Low vulnerability of the right phrenic nerve to electroporation ablation. Heart Rhythm. 2015;12:1838–44CrossRefPubMed van Driel VJ, Neven K, van Wessel H, et al. Low vulnerability of the right phrenic nerve to electroporation ablation. Heart Rhythm. 2015;12:1838–44CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Narayanan G, Hosein PJ, Arora G, et al. Percutaneous irreversible electroporation for downstaging and control of unresectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2012;23:1613–21.CrossRefPubMed Narayanan G, Hosein PJ, Arora G, et al. Percutaneous irreversible electroporation for downstaging and control of unresectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2012;23:1613–21.CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Mansson C, Bergenfeldt M, Brahmstaedt R, et al. Safety and preliminary efficacy of ultrasound-guided percutaneous irreversible electroporation for treatment of localized pancreatic cancer. Anticancer Res. 2014;34:289–93.PubMed Mansson C, Bergenfeldt M, Brahmstaedt R, et al. Safety and preliminary efficacy of ultrasound-guided percutaneous irreversible electroporation for treatment of localized pancreatic cancer. Anticancer Res. 2014;34:289–93.PubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Martin RC 2nd, Kwon D, Chalikonda S, et al. Treatment of 200 locally advanced (stage iii) pancreatic adenocarcinoma patients with irreversible electroporation: safety and efficacy. Ann Surg. 2015;262:486–94.CrossRefPubMed Martin RC 2nd, Kwon D, Chalikonda S, et al. Treatment of 200 locally advanced (stage iii) pancreatic adenocarcinoma patients with irreversible electroporation: safety and efficacy. Ann Surg. 2015;262:486–94.CrossRefPubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Belfiore MP, Ronza FM, Romano F, et al. Percutaneous CT-guided irreversible electroporation followed by chemotherapy as a novel neoadjuvant protocol in locally advanced pancreatic cancer: Our preliminary experience. Int J Surg. 2015;21 Suppl 1:S34–39CrossRefPubMed Belfiore MP, Ronza FM, Romano F, et al. Percutaneous CT-guided irreversible electroporation followed by chemotherapy as a novel neoadjuvant protocol in locally advanced pancreatic cancer: Our preliminary experience. Int J Surg. 2015;21 Suppl 1:S34–39CrossRefPubMed
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Martin RC 2nd, McFarland K, Ellis S, Velanovich V. Irreversible electroporation therapy in the management of locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma. J Am Coll Surg. 2012;215:361–9.CrossRefPubMed Martin RC 2nd, McFarland K, Ellis S, Velanovich V. Irreversible electroporation therapy in the management of locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma. J Am Coll Surg. 2012;215:361–9.CrossRefPubMed
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Martin RC, Philips P, Ellis S, et al. Irreversible electroporation of unresectable soft tissue tumors with vascular invasion: effective palliation. BMC Cancer. 2014;14:540.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Martin RC, Philips P, Ellis S, et al. Irreversible electroporation of unresectable soft tissue tumors with vascular invasion: effective palliation. BMC Cancer. 2014;14:540.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Kluger MD, Epelboym I, Schrope BA, et al. Single-institution experience with irreversible electroporation for T4 pancreatic cancer: first 50 patients. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016;23:1736–43.CrossRefPubMed Kluger MD, Epelboym I, Schrope BA, et al. Single-institution experience with irreversible electroporation for T4 pancreatic cancer: first 50 patients. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016;23:1736–43.CrossRefPubMed
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Callery MP, Chang KJ, Fishman EK, et al. Pretreatment assessment of resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer: expert consensus statement. Ann Surg Oncol 2009;16:1727–33CrossRefPubMed Callery MP, Chang KJ, Fishman EK, et al. Pretreatment assessment of resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer: expert consensus statement. Ann Surg Oncol 2009;16:1727–33CrossRefPubMed
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, et al. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer. 2009;45:228–47.CrossRefPubMed Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, et al. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer. 2009;45:228–47.CrossRefPubMed
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Tempero MA, Malafa MP, Behrman SW, et al. Pancreatic adenocarcinoma, version 2.2014: featured updates to the NCCN guidelines. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw. 2014;12:1083–93.CrossRef Tempero MA, Malafa MP, Behrman SW, et al. Pancreatic adenocarcinoma, version 2.2014: featured updates to the NCCN guidelines. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw. 2014;12:1083–93.CrossRef
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Dunki-Jacobs EM, Philips P, Martin RC 2nd. Evaluation of resistance as a measure of successful tumor ablation during irreversible electroporation of the pancreas. J Am Coll Surg. 2014;218:179–87.CrossRefPubMed Dunki-Jacobs EM, Philips P, Martin RC 2nd. Evaluation of resistance as a measure of successful tumor ablation during irreversible electroporation of the pancreas. J Am Coll Surg. 2014;218:179–87.CrossRefPubMed
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML, et al. The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg. 2009;250:187–96.CrossRefPubMed Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML, et al. The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg. 2009;250:187–96.CrossRefPubMed
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240:205–13CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240:205–13CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Verbeke CS, Leitch D, Menon KV, et al. Redefining the R1 resection in pancreatic cancer. Br J Surg. 2006;93:1232–7.CrossRefPubMed Verbeke CS, Leitch D, Menon KV, et al. Redefining the R1 resection in pancreatic cancer. Br J Surg. 2006;93:1232–7.CrossRefPubMed
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Ferrone CR, Marchegiani G, Hong TS, et al. Radiological and surgical implications of neoadjuvant treatment with FOLFIRINOX for locally advanced and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer. Ann Surg. 2015; 261:12–7CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Ferrone CR, Marchegiani G, Hong TS, et al. Radiological and surgical implications of neoadjuvant treatment with FOLFIRINOX for locally advanced and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer. Ann Surg. 2015; 261:12–7CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
41.
Zurück zum Zitat Kasumova GG, Conway WC, Tseng JF. The role of venous and arterial resection in pancreatic cancer surgery. Ann Surg Oncol. Epub 23 Nov 2016. Kasumova GG, Conway WC, Tseng JF. The role of venous and arterial resection in pancreatic cancer surgery. Ann Surg Oncol. Epub 23 Nov 2016.
42.
Zurück zum Zitat Klompmaker S, de Rooij T, Korteweg JJ, et al. Systematic review of outcomes after distal pancreatectomy with coeliac axis resection for locally advanced pancreatic cancer. Br J Surg. 2016;103(8):941–9CrossRefPubMed Klompmaker S, de Rooij T, Korteweg JJ, et al. Systematic review of outcomes after distal pancreatectomy with coeliac axis resection for locally advanced pancreatic cancer. Br J Surg. 2016;103(8):941–9CrossRefPubMed
43.
Zurück zum Zitat Andriulli A, Festa V, Botteri E, et al. Neoadjuvant/preoperative gemcitabine for patients with localized pancreatic cancer: a meta-analysis of prospective studies. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19:1644–62.CrossRefPubMed Andriulli A, Festa V, Botteri E, et al. Neoadjuvant/preoperative gemcitabine for patients with localized pancreatic cancer: a meta-analysis of prospective studies. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19:1644–62.CrossRefPubMed
44.
Zurück zum Zitat Gillen S, Schuster T, Zum Buschenfelde CM, et al. Preoperative/neoadjuvant therapy in pancreatic cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of response and resection percentages. PLoS Med. 2010;7:e1000267CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Gillen S, Schuster T, Zum Buschenfelde CM, et al. Preoperative/neoadjuvant therapy in pancreatic cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of response and resection percentages. PLoS Med. 2010;7:e1000267CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
45.
Zurück zum Zitat Conroy T, Paillot B, Francois E, et al. Irinotecan plus oxaliplatin and leucovorin-modulated fluorouracil in advanced pancreatic cancer: a Groupe Tumeurs Digestives of the Federation Nationale des Centres de Lutte Contre le Cancer study. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:1228–36CrossRefPubMed Conroy T, Paillot B, Francois E, et al. Irinotecan plus oxaliplatin and leucovorin-modulated fluorouracil in advanced pancreatic cancer: a Groupe Tumeurs Digestives of the Federation Nationale des Centres de Lutte Contre le Cancer study. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:1228–36CrossRefPubMed
46.
Zurück zum Zitat Marthey L, Sa-Cunha A, Blanc JF, et al. FOLFIRINOX for locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma: results of an AGEO multicenter prospective observational cohort. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22:295–01CrossRefPubMed Marthey L, Sa-Cunha A, Blanc JF, et al. FOLFIRINOX for locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma: results of an AGEO multicenter prospective observational cohort. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22:295–01CrossRefPubMed
47.
Zurück zum Zitat Paiella S, Butturini G, Frigerio I, et al. Safety and feasibility of irreversible electroporation (IRE) in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer: results of a prospective study. Dig Surg. 2015;32:90–7CrossRefPubMed Paiella S, Butturini G, Frigerio I, et al. Safety and feasibility of irreversible electroporation (IRE) in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer: results of a prospective study. Dig Surg. 2015;32:90–7CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Induction Chemotherapy Followed by Resection or Irreversible Electroporation in Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer (IMPALA): A Prospective Cohort Study
verfasst von
Jantien A. Vogel, MD, MSc
Steffi J. Rombouts, MD
Thijs de Rooij, MSc
Otto M. van Delden, MD, PhD, Prof
Marcel G. Dijkgraaf, MSc, PhD
Thomas M. van Gulik, MD, PhD, Prof
Jeanin E. van Hooft, MD, PhD, MBA
Hanneke W. van Laarhoven, MD, PhD, Prof
Robert C. Martin, MD, PhD, Prof
Annuska Schoorlemmer, MSc
Johanna W. Wilmink, MD, PhD
Krijn P. van Lienden, MD, PhD
Olivier R. Busch, MD, PhD, Prof
Marc G. Besselink, MD, MSc, PhD
Publikationsdatum
30.05.2017
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Ausgabe 9/2017
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Elektronische ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-017-5900-9

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 9/2017

Annals of Surgical Oncology 9/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.