Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 11/2017

12.06.2017 | Breast Oncology

Breast-Specific Sensuality and Sexual Function in Cancer Survivorship: Does Surgical Modality Matter?

verfasst von: Jennifer S. Gass, MD, Michaela Onstad, MD, Sarah Pesek, MD, Kristin Rojas, MD, Sara Fogarty, DO, Ashley Stuckey, MD, Christina Raker, ScD, Don S. Dizon, MD

Erschienen in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Ausgabe 11/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

More early-staged breast cancer patients are choosing mastectomy. No studies have addressed breast-specific sensuality (BSS), defined as the breast’s role during intimacy. We explored BSS among women undergoing lumpectomy (L), mastectomy alone (M), or with reconstruction (MR) and analyzed the association of surgical modality with sexual function.

Methods

Women undergoing breast cancer surgery between 2000 and 2013 were eligible for survey using investigator-generated questions and the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI). Demographic and surgical data were collected by chart review. The Kruskal–Wallis test was used to analyze FSFI scores, and χ 2 or Fisher’s exact tests were used for categorical data.

Results

Of 453 invited participants, 268 (59%) completed the survey. Of these, 69.4, 22.4, and 8.2% underwent L, MR, or M, respectively. The importance of the breast/chest wall during intimacy declined significantly regardless of surgical modality (L 83–74%, p = 0.0006; M 95–47%, p = 0.003; MR 93–77%, p = 0.002). No difference in sexual function was found between L, MR, and M (median FSFI score 28.2, 27.5, 25.9, respectively; p = 1.0). Comparing L versus MR, higher FSFI scores resulted with appearance satisfaction (29.0 vs. 22.6 p = 0.002) and preserved BSS as pleasurable breast caress (28.8 vs. 26.5, p = 0.04) and the breast as part of intimacy (28.8 vs. 24.8, p = 0.1).

Conclusions

Breast cancer surgery is associated with lowered BSS. However, BSS and appearance satisfaction scores are better for L and appear to correlate with improved sexual function postoperatively. These data may guide surgical counseling and contribute to survivorship outcomes.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Fisher B. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2002;347(16):1233–1241.CrossRefPubMed Fisher B. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2002;347(16):1233–1241.CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Veronesi U. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized study comparing breast-conserving surgery with radical mastectomy for early breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2002;347(16):1227–1232.CrossRefPubMed Veronesi U. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized study comparing breast-conserving surgery with radical mastectomy for early breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2002;347(16):1227–1232.CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Kummerow KL. Nationwide trends in mastectomy for early-stage breast cancer. JAMA Surg. 2015;150(1):9–16.CrossRefPubMed Kummerow KL. Nationwide trends in mastectomy for early-stage breast cancer. JAMA Surg. 2015;150(1):9–16.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Rutter CE. Growing use of mastectomy for ductal carcinoma-in situ of the breast among young women in the United States. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22(7):2378–2386.CrossRefPubMed Rutter CE. Growing use of mastectomy for ductal carcinoma-in situ of the breast among young women in the United States. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22(7):2378–2386.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Rosenberg SM. Perceptions, knowledge, and satisfaction with contralateral prophylactic mastectomy among young women with breast cancer: a cross-sectional survey. Ann Intern Med. 2013;159(6):373–381.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Rosenberg SM. Perceptions, knowledge, and satisfaction with contralateral prophylactic mastectomy among young women with breast cancer: a cross-sectional survey. Ann Intern Med. 2013;159(6):373–381.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Fisher CS. Fear of recurrence and perceived survival benefit are primary motivators for choosing mastectomy over breast-conservation therapy regardless of age. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19(10):3246–3250.CrossRefPubMed Fisher CS. Fear of recurrence and perceived survival benefit are primary motivators for choosing mastectomy over breast-conservation therapy regardless of age. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19(10):3246–3250.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Fancher TT. A woman’s influence to choose mastectomy as treatment for breast cancer. J Surg Res. 2009;153(1):128–131.CrossRefPubMed Fancher TT. A woman’s influence to choose mastectomy as treatment for breast cancer. J Surg Res. 2009;153(1):128–131.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Matsen CB et al. Skin flap necrosis after mastectomy with reconstruction: a prospective study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016;23(1):257–64.CrossRefPubMed Matsen CB et al. Skin flap necrosis after mastectomy with reconstruction: a prospective study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016;23(1):257–64.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat El-Tamer MB et al. Morbidity and mortality following breast cancer surgery in women: national benchmarks for standards of care. Ann Surg. 2007;245(5):665–71.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral El-Tamer MB et al. Morbidity and mortality following breast cancer surgery in women: national benchmarks for standards of care. Ann Surg. 2007;245(5):665–71.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Schover, L.R et al. (1995) Partial mastectomy and breast reconstruction. A comparison of their effects on psychosocial adjustment, body image, and sexuality. Cancer. 1995; 75(1):54–64. Schover, L.R et al. (1995) Partial mastectomy and breast reconstruction. A comparison of their effects on psychosocial adjustment, body image, and sexuality. Cancer. 1995; 75(1):54–64.
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Avis NE, Crawford S, Manuel J. Psychosocial problems among younger women with breast cancer. Psychooncology. 2004;13(5):295–308.CrossRefPubMed Avis NE, Crawford S, Manuel J. Psychosocial problems among younger women with breast cancer. Psychooncology. 2004;13(5):295–308.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Knobf MT. The menopausal symptom experience in young mid-life women with breast cancer. Cancer Nurs. 2001;24(3):201–210; quiz 210–1CrossRefPubMed Knobf MT. The menopausal symptom experience in young mid-life women with breast cancer. Cancer Nurs. 2001;24(3):201–210; quiz 210–1CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Wilmoth MC. The aftermath of breast cancer: an altered sexual self. Cancer Nurs. 2001;24(4):278–86.CrossRefPubMed Wilmoth MC. The aftermath of breast cancer: an altered sexual self. Cancer Nurs. 2001;24(4):278–86.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Fobair, P et al. Body image and sexual problems in young women with breast cancer. Psychooncology. 2006;15(7):579–94.CrossRefPubMed Fobair, P et al. Body image and sexual problems in young women with breast cancer. Psychooncology. 2006;15(7):579–94.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Speer JJ et al. Study of sexual functioning determinants in breast cancer survivors. Breast J. 2005;11(6):440–7.CrossRefPubMed Speer JJ et al. Study of sexual functioning determinants in breast cancer survivors. Breast J. 2005;11(6):440–7.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Meyerowitz BE et al. Sexuality following breast cancer. J Sex Marital Ther. 1999;25(3):237–50.CrossRefPubMed Meyerowitz BE et al. Sexuality following breast cancer. J Sex Marital Ther. 1999;25(3):237–50.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Ganz PA et al. Life after breast cancer: understanding women’s health-related quality of life and sexual functioning. J Clin Oncol. 1998;16(2):501–14.CrossRefPubMed Ganz PA et al. Life after breast cancer: understanding women’s health-related quality of life and sexual functioning. J Clin Oncol. 1998;16(2):501–14.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Ganz PA et al. Predictors of sexual health in women after a breast cancer diagnosis. J Clin Oncol. 1999;17(8):2371–80.CrossRefPubMed Ganz PA et al. Predictors of sexual health in women after a breast cancer diagnosis. J Clin Oncol. 1999;17(8):2371–80.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Thors CL, Broeckel JA, Jacobsen PB. Sexual functioning in breast cancer survivors. Cancer Control. 2001;8(5):442–8.CrossRefPubMed Thors CL, Broeckel JA, Jacobsen PB. Sexual functioning in breast cancer survivors. Cancer Control. 2001;8(5):442–8.CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Rowland JH et al. Role of breast reconstructive surgery in physical and emotional outcomes among breast cancer survivors. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000;92(17):1422–9.CrossRefPubMed Rowland JH et al. Role of breast reconstructive surgery in physical and emotional outcomes among breast cancer survivors. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000;92(17):1422–9.CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Ganz PA et al. Quality of life at the end of primary treatment of breast cancer: first results from the moving beyond cancer randomized trial. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004;96(5):376–87.CrossRefPubMed Ganz PA et al. Quality of life at the end of primary treatment of breast cancer: first results from the moving beyond cancer randomized trial. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004;96(5):376–87.CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Engel J et al. Quality of life following breast-conserving therapy or mastectomy: results of a 5-year prospective study. Breast J. 2004;10(3):223–31.CrossRefPubMed Engel J et al. Quality of life following breast-conserving therapy or mastectomy: results of a 5-year prospective study. Breast J. 2004;10(3):223–31.CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Pozo C et al. Effects of mastectomy versus lumpectomy on emotional adjustment to breast cancer: a prospective study of the first year postsurgery. J Clin Oncol. 1992;10(8):1292–8.CrossRefPubMed Pozo C et al. Effects of mastectomy versus lumpectomy on emotional adjustment to breast cancer: a prospective study of the first year postsurgery. J Clin Oncol. 1992;10(8):1292–8.CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Yurek D, Farrar W, Andersen BL. Breast cancer surgery: comparing surgical groups and determining individual differences in postoperative sexuality and body change stress. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2000;68(4):697–709.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Yurek D, Farrar W, Andersen BL. Breast cancer surgery: comparing surgical groups and determining individual differences in postoperative sexuality and body change stress. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2000;68(4):697–709.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
25.
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Aerts L et al. Sexual functioning in women after mastectomy versus breast conserving therapy for early-stage breast cancer: a prospective controlled study. Breast. 2014;23(5):629–36.CrossRefPubMed Aerts L et al. Sexual functioning in women after mastectomy versus breast conserving therapy for early-stage breast cancer: a prospective controlled study. Breast. 2014;23(5):629–36.CrossRefPubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Rivadeneira, D.E et al. Skin-sparing mastectomy with immediate breast reconstruction: a critical analysis of local recurrence. Cancer J. 2000;6(5):331–335.PubMed Rivadeneira, D.E et al. Skin-sparing mastectomy with immediate breast reconstruction: a critical analysis of local recurrence. Cancer J. 2000;6(5):331–335.PubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Petit JY et al. When mastectomy becomes inevitable: the nipple-sparing approach. Breast. 2005;14(6):527–31.CrossRefPubMed Petit JY et al. When mastectomy becomes inevitable: the nipple-sparing approach. Breast. 2005;14(6):527–31.CrossRefPubMed
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Gerber B et al. Skin-sparing mastectomy with conservation of the nipple-areola complex and autologous reconstruction is an oncologically safe procedure. Ann Surg. 2003;238(1):120–7.PubMedPubMedCentral Gerber B et al. Skin-sparing mastectomy with conservation of the nipple-areola complex and autologous reconstruction is an oncologically safe procedure. Ann Surg. 2003;238(1):120–7.PubMedPubMedCentral
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Wang F et al. Total skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction: an evolution of technique and assessment of outcomes. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014;21(10):3223–30.CrossRefPubMed Wang F et al. Total skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction: an evolution of technique and assessment of outcomes. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014;21(10):3223–30.CrossRefPubMed
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Didier F et al. Does nipple preservation in mastectomy improve satisfaction with cosmetic results, psychological adjustment, body image and sexuality? Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2009;118(3):623–33.CrossRefPubMed Didier F et al. Does nipple preservation in mastectomy improve satisfaction with cosmetic results, psychological adjustment, body image and sexuality? Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2009;118(3):623–33.CrossRefPubMed
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Levin R. The breast/nipple/areola complex and human sexuality. Sex Relation Ther. 2006;21(2):237–49.CrossRef Levin R. The breast/nipple/areola complex and human sexuality. Sex Relation Ther. 2006;21(2):237–49.CrossRef
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Levin R, Meston C. Nipple/breast stimulation and sexual arousal in young men and women. J Sex Med. 2006;3(3):450–4.CrossRefPubMed Levin R, Meston C. Nipple/breast stimulation and sexual arousal in young men and women. J Sex Med. 2006;3(3):450–4.CrossRefPubMed
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Turnbull OH et al. Reports of intimate touch: erogenous zones and somatosensory cortical organization. Cortex. 2014;53:146–54.CrossRefPubMed Turnbull OH et al. Reports of intimate touch: erogenous zones and somatosensory cortical organization. Cortex. 2014;53:146–54.CrossRefPubMed
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Robinson VC. Support for the hypothesis that sexual breast stimulation is an ancestral practice and a key to understanding women’s health. Med Hypotheses. 2015;85(6):976–85.CrossRefPubMed Robinson VC. Support for the hypothesis that sexual breast stimulation is an ancestral practice and a key to understanding women’s health. Med Hypotheses. 2015;85(6):976–85.CrossRefPubMed
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Rosen, R et al. The Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI): a multidimensional self-report instrument for the assessment of female sexual function. J Sex Marital Ther. 2000;26(2):191–208.CrossRefPubMed Rosen, R et al. The Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI): a multidimensional self-report instrument for the assessment of female sexual function. J Sex Marital Ther. 2000;26(2):191–208.CrossRefPubMed
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Baser RE, Li Y, Carter J. Psychometric validation of the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) in cancer survivors. Cancer. 2012;118(18):4606–18.CrossRefPubMed Baser RE, Li Y, Carter J. Psychometric validation of the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) in cancer survivors. Cancer. 2012;118(18):4606–18.CrossRefPubMed
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Mohammedi J. The Female Sexual Function Index [Fsfi]: Validation of the Iranian version. Payesh. 2008;7(3):269–78. Mohammedi J. The Female Sexual Function Index [Fsfi]: Validation of the Iranian version. Payesh. 2008;7(3):269–78.
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Wiegel M, Meston C, Rosen R. The female sexual function index (FSFI): cross-validation and development of clinical cutoff scores. J Sex Marital Ther. 2005;31(1):1–20.CrossRefPubMed Wiegel M, Meston C, Rosen R. The female sexual function index (FSFI): cross-validation and development of clinical cutoff scores. J Sex Marital Ther. 2005;31(1):1–20.CrossRefPubMed
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Bartula I, Sherman KA. The Female Sexual Functioning Index (FSFI): evaluation of acceptability, reliability, and validity in women with breast cancer. Support Care Cancer. 2015;23(9):2633–41.CrossRefPubMed Bartula I, Sherman KA. The Female Sexual Functioning Index (FSFI): evaluation of acceptability, reliability, and validity in women with breast cancer. Support Care Cancer. 2015;23(9):2633–41.CrossRefPubMed
41.
Zurück zum Zitat Meyer-Bahlburg, H.F., Dolezal C., The female sexual function index: a methodological critique and suggestions for improvement. J Sex Marital Ther. 2007;33(3):217–24.CrossRefPubMed Meyer-Bahlburg, H.F., Dolezal C., The female sexual function index: a methodological critique and suggestions for improvement. J Sex Marital Ther. 2007;33(3):217–24.CrossRefPubMed
42.
Zurück zum Zitat Hayes RD. Assessing female sexual dysfunction in epidemiological studies: why is it necessary to measure both low sexual function and sexually-related distress? Sex Health. 2008;5(3):215–8.CrossRefPubMed Hayes RD. Assessing female sexual dysfunction in epidemiological studies: why is it necessary to measure both low sexual function and sexually-related distress? Sex Health. 2008;5(3):215–8.CrossRefPubMed
44.
Zurück zum Zitat Hewitt M, Stovall E. From cancer patient to cancer survivor: lost in translation, 2006. Hewitt M, Stovall E. From cancer patient to cancer survivor: lost in translation, 2006.
45.
Zurück zum Zitat Harris J. Diseases of the breast. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2014. Harris J. Diseases of the breast. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2014.
46.
Zurück zum Zitat Langellier KM, Sullivan CF. Breast talk in breast cancer narratives. Qual Health Res. 1998;8(1):76–94.CrossRefPubMed Langellier KM, Sullivan CF. Breast talk in breast cancer narratives. Qual Health Res. 1998;8(1):76–94.CrossRefPubMed
47.
Zurück zum Zitat Young I. Breasted experience: the look and the feeling philosphy and medicine. 1992;43:215–230. Young I. Breasted experience: the look and the feeling philosphy and medicine. 1992;43:215–230.
48.
Zurück zum Zitat Gilbert E, Usher JM, Perz J. Sexuality after breast cancer: a review. Mauritius. 2010;66:397–407. Gilbert E, Usher JM, Perz J. Sexuality after breast cancer: a review. Mauritius. 2010;66:397–407.
49.
Zurück zum Zitat Spence J. Cultural sniping: the art of transgression. London: Sage, 1995. Spence J. Cultural sniping: the art of transgression. London: Sage, 1995.
50.
Zurück zum Zitat Moyer A. Psychosocial outcomes of breast-conserving surgery versus mastectomy: a meta-analytic review. Health Psychol. 1997;16(3):284–98.CrossRefPubMed Moyer A. Psychosocial outcomes of breast-conserving surgery versus mastectomy: a meta-analytic review. Health Psychol. 1997;16(3):284–98.CrossRefPubMed
51.
52.
Zurück zum Zitat Kwait R, Pesek S, Onstad M, Edmonson D, Ghandi C, Raker C, Stuckey A, Gass J. Preserving sexual function in breast cancer survivorship: does surgical modality matter? Ann Surg Oncol. 2016;23:93–94CrossRef Kwait R, Pesek S, Onstad M, Edmonson D, Ghandi C, Raker C, Stuckey A, Gass J. Preserving sexual function in breast cancer survivorship: does surgical modality matter? Ann Surg Oncol. 2016;23:93–94CrossRef
53.
Zurück zum Zitat Butler EC, Kwait R, Pesek S, Stuckey A, Gass JS. Appearance satisfaction in breast cancer survivorship: does time heal and does surgical modality matter? Poster Session presented at American Society of Breast Surgery Annual Meeting, Las Vegas, NV (2017) Butler EC, Kwait R, Pesek S, Stuckey A, Gass JS. Appearance satisfaction in breast cancer survivorship: does time heal and does surgical modality matter? Poster Session presented at American Society of Breast Surgery Annual Meeting, Las Vegas, NV (2017)
54.
Zurück zum Zitat Peled AW et al. Patient-reported outcomes and satisfaction after total skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate expander-implant reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg. 2014;72(Suppl 1):S48–52.PubMed Peled AW et al. Patient-reported outcomes and satisfaction after total skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate expander-implant reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg. 2014;72(Suppl 1):S48–52.PubMed
55.
Zurück zum Zitat Schlenz I et al. The sensitivity of the nipple-areola complex: an anatomic study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000;105(3):905–9.CrossRefPubMed Schlenz I et al. The sensitivity of the nipple-areola complex: an anatomic study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000;105(3):905–9.CrossRefPubMed
56.
Zurück zum Zitat Bresser PJ et al. Satisfaction with prophylactic mastectomy and breast reconstruction in genetically predisposed women. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;117(6):1675–1682; discussion 1683–4.CrossRefPubMed Bresser PJ et al. Satisfaction with prophylactic mastectomy and breast reconstruction in genetically predisposed women. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;117(6):1675–1682; discussion 1683–4.CrossRefPubMed
57.
Zurück zum Zitat Temple WJ et al. Conservation surgery for breast cancer as the preferred choice: a prospective analysis. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24(21):3367–73.CrossRefPubMed Temple WJ et al. Conservation surgery for breast cancer as the preferred choice: a prospective analysis. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24(21):3367–73.CrossRefPubMed
58.
Zurück zum Zitat Murthy V, Chamberlain R. Defining a place for nipple sparing mastectomy in modern breast care: an evidence based review. Breast J. 2013;9(6):571–81.CrossRef Murthy V, Chamberlain R. Defining a place for nipple sparing mastectomy in modern breast care: an evidence based review. Breast J. 2013;9(6):571–81.CrossRef
59.
Zurück zum Zitat Dossett L et al. Prospective evaluation of skin and nipple-areola sensation and patient satisfaction after nipple-sparing mastectomy. J Surg Oncol. 2016;114(1):11–6.CrossRefPubMed Dossett L et al. Prospective evaluation of skin and nipple-areola sensation and patient satisfaction after nipple-sparing mastectomy. J Surg Oncol. 2016;114(1):11–6.CrossRefPubMed
60.
Zurück zum Zitat Khan A, Zhang J, Sollazzo V, Mohammed K, Gui G. Sensory changes of the reconstructed breast envelope after skin-sparing mastectomy. EJSO. 2016;42:973–9.CrossRefPubMed Khan A, Zhang J, Sollazzo V, Mohammed K, Gui G. Sensory changes of the reconstructed breast envelope after skin-sparing mastectomy. EJSO. 2016;42:973–9.CrossRefPubMed
61.
Zurück zum Zitat Peled AW et al. Patient reported outcomes and satisfaction after total skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate expander-implant reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg. 2014;72:276–80.CrossRef Peled AW et al. Patient reported outcomes and satisfaction after total skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate expander-implant reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg. 2014;72:276–80.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Breast-Specific Sensuality and Sexual Function in Cancer Survivorship: Does Surgical Modality Matter?
verfasst von
Jennifer S. Gass, MD
Michaela Onstad, MD
Sarah Pesek, MD
Kristin Rojas, MD
Sara Fogarty, DO
Ashley Stuckey, MD
Christina Raker, ScD
Don S. Dizon, MD
Publikationsdatum
12.06.2017
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Ausgabe 11/2017
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Elektronische ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-017-5905-4

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 11/2017

Annals of Surgical Oncology 11/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.