Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 10/2018

26.06.2018 | Breast Oncology

Treatment Outcomes for Pleomorphic Lobular Carcinoma In Situ of the Breast

verfasst von: Amita A. Desai, MD, Rafael E. Jimenez, MD, Tanya L. Hoskin, MS, Courtney N. Day, BS, Judy C. Boughey, MD, Tina J. Hieken, MD

Erschienen in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Ausgabe 10/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Pleomorphic lobular carcinoma in situ (PLCIS) is an uncommon high-grade in situ lesion that shares morphologic features of both classic lobular and ductal carcinoma in situ. Data on the natural history of pure PLCIS are limited, and no evidence-based consensus guidelines for management exist.

Methods

From our prospectively maintained institutional pathology and breast surgery databases, we identified all patients with a diagnosis of PLCIS on core needle biopsy (CNB) or excisional biopsy from 2004 to 2017. Patient, tumor, treatment, and outcome data were abstracted to analyze upstage rates and treatment outcomes.

Results

We identified 18 patients with pure PLCIS: 15 diagnosed on CNB, 2 diagnosed at operation for atypia on CNB, and 1 diagnosed after excisional biopsy without preceding CNB. Of the 15 patients with PLCIS on CNB, 3 (20%) were upgraded to invasive cancer on surgical excision. Overall, 7 patients were treated with mastectomy (all margin-negative) and 11 with lumpectomy (one with a focally positive margin). Eight patients received adjuvant therapy: six endocrine therapy, one radiation therapy, and one received both. Among patients with a final diagnosis of PLCIS, two ipsilateral recurrences were observed at follow-up: one invasive lobular carcinoma at 87 months and one PLCIS at 16 months postoperatively.

Conclusion

PLCIS on CNB mandates surgical resection as 20% of patients may be upgraded to invasive cancer, and outcomes following pathologic margin-negative surgical resection were excellent with only one invasive recurrence observed. Larger-scale investigation with longer follow-up is needed to define a role for adjuvant therapy and to develop evidence-based treatment guidelines.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Frost AR, Tsangaris TN, Silverberg SG. Pleomorphic lobular carcinoma in situ. Pathol Case Rev. 1996;1:27–31.CrossRef Frost AR, Tsangaris TN, Silverberg SG. Pleomorphic lobular carcinoma in situ. Pathol Case Rev. 1996;1:27–31.CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Gomes DS, Porto SS, Rocha RM, Gobbi H. Usefulness and limitations of E-cadherin and beta-catenin in the classification of breast carcinomas in situ with mixed pattern. Diagn Pathol. 2013;8:114.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Gomes DS, Porto SS, Rocha RM, Gobbi H. Usefulness and limitations of E-cadherin and beta-catenin in the classification of breast carcinomas in situ with mixed pattern. Diagn Pathol. 2013;8:114.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Masannat YA, Baines SK, Pinder SE, Purushotham AD. Challenges in the management of pleomorphic lobular carcinoma in situ of the breast. Breast. 2013;22(2):194–6.CrossRefPubMed Masannat YA, Baines SK, Pinder SE, Purushotham AD. Challenges in the management of pleomorphic lobular carcinoma in situ of the breast. Breast. 2013;22(2):194–6.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. Breast Cancer 2018. Accessed 30 Mar 2018; Available at www.NCCN.org. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. Breast Cancer 2018. Accessed 30 Mar 2018; Available at www.​NCCN.​org.
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Pieri AJ, Harvey J, Bundred N. Pleomorphic lobular carcinoma in situ of the breast: can the evidence guide practice? World J Clin Oncol. 2014;5:546–53.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Pieri AJ, Harvey J, Bundred N. Pleomorphic lobular carcinoma in situ of the breast: can the evidence guide practice? World J Clin Oncol. 2014;5:546–53.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Blair SL, Emerson DK, Kulkarni S, Hwang ES, Malcarne V, Ollila DW. Breast surgeon’s survey: no consensus for surgical treatment of pleomorphic lobular carcinoma in situ. Breast J. 2013;19:116–8.CrossRefPubMed Blair SL, Emerson DK, Kulkarni S, Hwang ES, Malcarne V, Ollila DW. Breast surgeon’s survey: no consensus for surgical treatment of pleomorphic lobular carcinoma in situ. Breast J. 2013;19:116–8.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Blair SL, Thompson K, Rococco J, Malcarne V, Beitsch PD, Ollila DW. Attaining negative margins in breast-conservation operations: is there a consensus among breast surgeons? J Am Coll Surg. 2009;209:608–13.CrossRefPubMed Blair SL, Thompson K, Rococco J, Malcarne V, Beitsch PD, Ollila DW. Attaining negative margins in breast-conservation operations: is there a consensus among breast surgeons? J Am Coll Surg. 2009;209:608–13.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Sullivan ME, Khan SA, Sullu Y, Schiller C, Susnik B. Lobular carcinoma in situ variants in breast cores: potential for misdiagnosis, upgrade rates at surgical excision, and practical implications. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2010;134:1024–8.PubMed Sullivan ME, Khan SA, Sullu Y, Schiller C, Susnik B. Lobular carcinoma in situ variants in breast cores: potential for misdiagnosis, upgrade rates at surgical excision, and practical implications. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2010;134:1024–8.PubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Khoury T, Karabakhtsian RG, Mattson D, et al. Pleomorphic lobular carcinoma in situ of the breast: clinicopathological review of 47 cases. Histopathology. 2014;64:981–93.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Khoury T, Karabakhtsian RG, Mattson D, et al. Pleomorphic lobular carcinoma in situ of the breast: clinicopathological review of 47 cases. Histopathology. 2014;64:981–93.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Chen YY, Hwang ES, Roy R, et al. Genetic and phenotypic characteristics of pleomorphic lobular carcinoma in situ of the breast. Am J Surg Pathol. 2009;33: 1683–94.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Chen YY, Hwang ES, Roy R, et al. Genetic and phenotypic characteristics of pleomorphic lobular carcinoma in situ of the breast. Am J Surg Pathol. 2009;33: 1683–94.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Wazir U, Wazir A, Wells C, Mokbel K. Pleomorphic lobular carcinoma in situ: current evidence and a systemic review. Oncol Lett. 2016;12:4863–4868.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Wazir U, Wazir A, Wells C, Mokbel K. Pleomorphic lobular carcinoma in situ: current evidence and a systemic review. Oncol Lett. 2016;12:4863–4868.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
Zurück zum Zitat De Brot M, Koslow MS, Muhsen S, et al. Pleomorphic lobular carcinoma in situ of the breast: a single institution experience with clinical follow-up and centralized pathology review. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2017;165:411–420.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral De Brot M, Koslow MS, Muhsen S, et al. Pleomorphic lobular carcinoma in situ of the breast: a single institution experience with clinical follow-up and centralized pathology review. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2017;165:411–420.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Downs-Kelly E, Bell D, Perkins GH, Sneige N, Middleton LP. Clinical implications of margin involvement by pleomorphic lobular carcinoma in situ. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2011;135:737–43.PubMed Downs-Kelly E, Bell D, Perkins GH, Sneige N, Middleton LP. Clinical implications of margin involvement by pleomorphic lobular carcinoma in situ. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2011;135:737–43.PubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Fasola CE, Chen JJ, Jensen KC, Allison KH, Horst KC. Characteristics and clinical outcomes of pleomorphic lobular carcinoma in situ of the breast. Breast J. 2018;4:66–69.CrossRef Fasola CE, Chen JJ, Jensen KC, Allison KH, Horst KC. Characteristics and clinical outcomes of pleomorphic lobular carcinoma in situ of the breast. Breast J. 2018;4:66–69.CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Flanagan MR, Rendi MH, Calhoun KE, Anderson BO, Javid SH. Pleomorphic lobular carcinoma in situ: radiologic-pathologic features and clinical management. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22:4263–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Flanagan MR, Rendi MH, Calhoun KE, Anderson BO, Javid SH. Pleomorphic lobular carcinoma in situ: radiologic-pathologic features and clinical management. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22:4263–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Gradishar WJ, Anderson BO, Balassanian R, et al. Breast cancer, Version 4.2017, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2018;16:310–320.CrossRefPubMed Gradishar WJ, Anderson BO, Balassanian R, et al. Breast cancer, Version 4.2017, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2018;16:310–320.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Fisher B, Dignam J, Wolmark N, et al. Tamoxifen in treatment of intraductal breast cancer: National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project B-24 randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 1999;353:1993–2000.CrossRefPubMed Fisher B, Dignam J, Wolmark N, et al. Tamoxifen in treatment of intraductal breast cancer: National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project B-24 randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 1999;353:1993–2000.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Fisher B, Costantino JP, Wickerham DL, et al. Tamoxifen for prevention of breast cancer: report of the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project P-1 study. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1998;90:1371–88.CrossRefPubMed Fisher B, Costantino JP, Wickerham DL, et al. Tamoxifen for prevention of breast cancer: report of the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project P-1 study. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1998;90:1371–88.CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Treatment Outcomes for Pleomorphic Lobular Carcinoma In Situ of the Breast
verfasst von
Amita A. Desai, MD
Rafael E. Jimenez, MD
Tanya L. Hoskin, MS
Courtney N. Day, BS
Judy C. Boughey, MD
Tina J. Hieken, MD
Publikationsdatum
26.06.2018
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Ausgabe 10/2018
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Elektronische ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-018-6591-6

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 10/2018

Annals of Surgical Oncology 10/2018 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

CME: 2 Punkte

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht, PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske Das Webinar S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“ beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.