Circulation Journal
Online ISSN : 1347-4820
Print ISSN : 1346-9843
ISSN-L : 1346-9843
Epidemiology
Comparison of Body Mass Index, Waist Circumference, and Waist-to-Height Ratio for Predicting the Clustering of Cardiometabolic Risk Factors by Age in Japanese Workers
– Japan Epidemiology Collaboration on Occupational Health Study –
Ai HoriAkiko NanriNobuaki SakamotoKeisuke KuwaharaSatsue NagahamaNoritada KatoKenji FukasawaKengo NakamotoMayumi OhtsuAki MatsuiTakeshi KochiMasafumi EguchiTeppei ImaiAkiko NishiharaKentaro TomitaTaizo MurakamiChii ShimizuMakiko ShimizuToshiaki MiyamotoAkihiko UeharaMakoto YamamotoTohru NakagawaShuichiro YamamotoToru HondaHiroko OkazakiNaoko SasakiKayo KurotaniNgoc Minh PhamIsamu KabeTetsuya MizoueTomofumi SoneSeitaro Dohifor the Japan Epidemiology Collaboration on Occupational Health Study Group
Author information
JOURNAL FREE ACCESS
Supplementary material

2014 Volume 78 Issue 5 Pages 1160-1168

Details
Abstract

Background: Waist-to-height ratio (WHtR) has been suggested as a better screening tool than body mass index (BMI) and waist circumference (WC) for assessing cardiometabolic risk. However, most previous studies did not consider age. Methods and Results: Participants were 45,618 men and 8,092 women aged 15–84 years who received periodic health checkups in 9 companies in Japan. Clustering of cardiometabolic risk factors was defined by the existence of 2 or more of high blood pressure, hyperglycemia, and dyslipidemia. In both men and women, unadjusted area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver-operating characteristic curve for WHtR in detecting the clustering of cardiometabolic risk factors was significantly higher than that for either BMI or WC; the AUCs for WHtR, BMI, and WC, respectively, were 0.734, 0.705, and 0.717 in men and 0.782, 0.762, and 0.755 in women. After adjustment for age, however, such differences were not observed; the corresponding values were 0.702, 0.701, and 0.696 in men. In women, the age-adjusted AUC for BMI was slightly higher than for other indices (WHtR, 0.721; BMI, 0.726; WC, 0.707). Conclusions: The screening performance of WHtR for detecting the clustering cardiometabolic risk factors was not superior to that of BMI.  (Circ J 2014; 78: 1160–1168)

Content from these authors
© 2014 THE JAPANESE CIRCULATION SOCIETY
Previous article Next article
feedback
Top