Keywords
yellow fever, epidemics, Africa, Americas, Brazil, vector-borne disease, arbovirus,
This article is included in the Emerging Diseases and Outbreaks gateway.
yellow fever, epidemics, Africa, Americas, Brazil, vector-borne disease, arbovirus,
This new version considered the interesting comments of both reviewers regarding the situation of yellow fever in Brazil, and has been carefully revised and extended, attending all the suggestions. The data regarding the ongoing epidemiological, ecological and entomological scenario in Brazil has been updated, and its implications for expansion to other countries in the Americas.
See the authors' detailed response to the review by Paola Barato
See the authors' detailed response to the review by Jean-Paul J. Gonzalez and Juergen Richt
Yellow fever (YF) is a haemorrhagic viral, vector-borne disease with a high case fatality rate (CFR), spread by infected mosquitoes caused by the YF virus, an arbovirus belonging to the genus Flavivirus, family Flaviviridae. It has reappeared as a threat to global public health, evidenced by new epidemics in several countries in Africa and South America through autochthonous transmission, and in Asia with imported cases1. In Asia, but also Europe and North America, potential spreads beyond the borders of the endemic countries is a matter of global concern. Currently, there are around 1 billion people, from 49 endemic countries, that are considered at risk1,2. In this opinion article, we would like to express our concern regarding the expansion of YF in Latin America, beyond Brazil. In that country there is currently an epidemic situation, where, since the beginning of the outbreak in December 2016 up to 29 March 2017, there have been 1,987 cases of yellow fever reported (574 confirmed, 926 discarded, and 487 suspected under investigation). This included 282 deaths (187 confirmed, 24 discarded, and 71 under investigation) with a CFR of 33% among confirmed cases.
Although relatively wide scale YF vaccination has been applied, a growing number of outbreaks have been documented in several African countries in the last decade1–3. The most recent outbreak occurred in Angola, resulting in 7,344 suspected cases, 962 laboratory-confirmed cases and 137 deaths (with a CFR of 14.2%), and lasting from December 2015 to October 20162. In addition to spread of YF by autochthonous transmission, confirmed imported cases of YF were identified in China and Kenya1–3. Other countries, such as Chad, Ghana and Guinea have also reported outbreaks or sporadic cases not linked to the outbreak in Angola1–15. On Mar 12, 2016, the first imported case of YF was confirmed by China CDC. The patient was a 32 years old Chinese male who worked in Luanda and had fever and chills on Mar 8, 2016. He arrived to Beijing, where he was immediately hospitalized. Eleven imported cases of confirmed yellow fever occurred in China from March of 2016, prompting calls to strengthen surveillance systems at the border (http://www.who.int/csr/don/6-april-2016-yellow-fever-china/en/)16.
Even though no new cases have been confirmed since the last year in Angola, Africa, the global threat continues, indeed now with its epicentre in Brazil, South America. An ongoing outbreak of YF has started in Brazil since December 1, 2016. Up to February 22, 2017, a total of 1,336 cases of YF infection have been reported (292 laboratory confirmed, 920 suspected and 124 ruled out), resulting in 215 deaths (101 confirmed, 109 suspected, 5 ruled out) across six states of the country (Bahia, Espírito Santo, Minas Gerais, Rio Grande do Norte, São Paulo and Tocantins). The current CFR is 35% (from confirmed cases) and 12% (from suspected cases)3.
The geographical spread of the cases in Brazil has led to major concern, because cases are no longer being reported just in the jungle, but also in the most densely populated cities and states such as Minas Gerais and São Paulo. Fortunately, these regions have a long history of high YF vaccination coverage in young people (at least in urban areas), in contrast with the low vaccination rates in other major urban centres of Brazil4. Nevertheless, the lack of YF vaccination coverage was raised several times by the Brazilian provincial health authorities back in the early 2000s, but they were unable to reach the remote western zones of Minas Gerais.
Although the epidemiology and clinical manifestations of YF should be familiar to healthcare workers in endemic countries, where clinical manifestations can overlap with other acute viral haemorrhagic fevers and other etiologies of the febrile syndrome, a rapid spread of misinformation about this harmful disease in social media and a lack of online training for healthcare workers has been reported in the recent outbreak of 2016–2017 in the Americas5,6. In addition to limited health resources, this highlights that early identification could be a challenge in Latin America, as has been observed in the past with Zika and chikungunya virus outbreaks in this region, particularly in countries such as Brazil and Colombia7,8.
Given the current YF situation in Brazil, and the emergence of new cases in areas where YF has not occurred for several years, the Brazilian health policies have been oriented to continue efforts to detect, confirm, and adequately and timely treat cases of YF (http://portalsaude.saude.gov.br/index.php/o-ministerio/principal/secretarias/svs/febre-amarela). To this end, health care workers should be kept up to date and trained to detect and treat cases, especially in areas of known virus circulation. Furthermore, they should also take the necessary actions to keep travelers, heading to areas where YF vaccination is mandatory, informed and vaccinated.
There seems to be an almost imminent risk of YF outbreaks turning into a large epidemic9. Unvaccinated travelers heading to the affected states in Brazil are at risk of spreading the virus in to areas where YF risk factors (human susceptibility, prevalence of competent vector, and animal reservoirs) are present. The geographic area of human cases has expanded recently to Rio de Janeiro, São Paulo, and Pará states. Ecological factors and enzootics would promote the necessary spillover that would lead to an epidemic10–12, and unfortunately, nothing can be done to halt the infection of non-human primates in the affected areas. Moreover, the vast border of Brazil, with 10 neighboring countries/territories (Uruguay, Argentina, Paraguay, Bolivia, Peru, Colombia, Venezuela, Guyana, Suriname and French Guiana), the lack of efficient health policies and surveillance systems, and the distribution of Aedes vectors (as well the uncontrollable sylvatic vector species in the genus Haemagogus and Sabethes), raise the possibility of the widespread YF throughout the Americas, including the USA. The USA has suitable conditions for autochthonous cases in areas such as South Florida, where Aedes albopictus is present and has been linked to transmission of dengue virus (another flavivirus), chikungunya and possibly Zika. These entomological factors should strongly emphasize the risk of imported cases in temperate zones (i.e. Central and North Americas) during the boreal summer and Aedes spp. activity in Central and North America. It has been documented elsewhere for Dengue virus (New Mexico or Texas) and, even in the case of vectors for other diseases, such as Anopheles, the case of airport malaria in the US.
Mass vaccination of the at-risk population13, and public health awareness and preparedness is urgently needed to control the current 2016–2017 outbreak in Brazil and prevent a possible epidemic related to this deadly disease. Nevertheless, these recent outbreaks and the lack of YF vaccine stock piling (WHO) means that YF vaccine availability needs to be strategized by the countries health authorities and international community. Also, the lifelong protection of the vaccine, its innocuity and the reduction by 1/10 of the immunity dose are new and of extremely high importance for global and public health.
More studies, as well as new innovative strategies for vector control (e.g. involving community participation), early prevention (e.g. sampling in risk areas to look for asymptomatic subjects), warning and enhanced surveillance (using smart phones), are necessary in order to improve the scenario of this reemerging arboviral threat14,15. Mosquito biosurveillance is an important issue to control the epidemic risk. Haemagogus and Sabethes are specific for South America and have been well studied; the risk and ability of Aedes albopictus expansion to transmit the virus in the Americas needs to be assessed, and an entomological priority set up when needed (i.e. public health priority in at-risk areas).
Finally, another matter of concern that is also important to mention is the trans-border risk. Ultimately traveler’s to/from endemic areas need to be covered by a mandatory international certificate of vaccination to protect the borders (trans-border risk). The long-time mystery of the absence of YF in South East Asia up to 2016 is also an issue to keep in mind for the future - particularly in term of global risk, with new imported cases, for example those reported in China, now occurring.
YOM, AMPB and AJRM all participated in the writing and editing of the manuscript. All authors have agreed to the final content of this opinion article.
Views | Downloads | |
---|---|---|
F1000Research | - | - |
PubMed Central
Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.
|
- | - |
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Is the topic of the opinion article discussed accurately in the context of the current literature?
Yes
Are all factual statements correct and adequately supported by citations?
Partly
Are arguments sufficiently supported by evidence from the published literature?
Yes
Are the conclusions drawn balanced and justified on the basis of the presented arguments?
Yes
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Reviewer Expertise: Infectious diseases
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
Invited Reviewers | ||
---|---|---|
1 | 2 | |
Version 2 (revision) 25 Apr 17 |
read | |
Version 1 30 Mar 17 |
read | read |
Provide sufficient details of any financial or non-financial competing interests to enable users to assess whether your comments might lead a reasonable person to question your impartiality. Consider the following examples, but note that this is not an exhaustive list:
Sign up for content alerts and receive a weekly or monthly email with all newly published articles
Already registered? Sign in
The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.
You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.
To sign in, please click here.
If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.
You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.
To sign in, please click here.
If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.
If your email address is registered with us, we will email you instructions to reset your password.
If you think you should have received this email but it has not arrived, please check your spam filters and/or contact for further assistance.
Comments on this article Comments (0)