Keywords
bone regeneration, bone marrow derived mesenchymal stem cells, platelet rich fibrin.
bone regeneration, bone marrow derived mesenchymal stem cells, platelet rich fibrin.
Several biomaterials are used to treat bone deficiencies1. Autologous bone graft limitations are related to harvesting process including the quality and quantity of grafted bone and complications at the second surgical site, while allogenic bone grafts carry the risk of disease transmission and immunological rejection. Hence, there are considerable motivations for developing alternative solutions for bone regeneration2. The use of tissue engineering approaches has proven to be effective in inducing bone formation by applying mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs)3 or platelet-rich fibrin (PRF)4. The capacity of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BM-MSCs) for bone repair has been well reported in vivo with promising results; BM-MSCs remain the most widely used source of osteogenic cells in bone tissue engineering studies5–7 MSCs are undifferentiated cells capable of replication8 that have the potential to differentiate along multiple cell lineages, giving rise to cells that form mesenchymal tissues, including bone, cartilage and muscle9. PRF is a second-generation platelet-rich biomaterial10. PRF is derived from a natural and slowly progressive polymerization process occurring during centrifugation, which increases incorporation of the circulating cytokines and growth factors in the fibrin mesh and prevents them from undergoing proteolysis11. In addition, the PRF fibrin matrix provides an optimal support for MSCs which constitute the determining elements responsible for real therapeutic potential12,13. Platelets are active growth factor-secreting cells that initiate wound-healing, connective tissue healing and cell proliferation14. Therefore, PRF is considered as an inexpensive autologous fibrin scaffold prepared in approximately one minute and hence no cost for membrane and bone graft15. In the present research, rats were used as they are easy to handle and less expensive. In addition, breeding cycles are substantially shorter, providing enough animals in a reasonable amount of time16. Research on bone tissue engineering is focused on the development of alternatives to autologous bone grafts for bone reconstruction. Although multiple stem cell-based products and biomaterials are currently being examined, comparative studies are rarely achieved to evaluate the most appropriate approach in this context. The purpose of this study was to compare the regenerative capacity of bone marrow (BM)-MSCs and PRF implanted in surgically induced bone defects in rats’ tibiae.
The study protocol was approved by the Research ethics committee of Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University (151031).
A total of 36 male Wistar rats weighing 175–200 g, aged 12–14 weeks-old were used in this study. The animals were obtained from and housed in the Animal house, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University. The animals were randomly placed in separate cages under controlled room temperature 25±2°C with 12/12 h light/dark cycle and were fed food and water ad libitum.
BM-MSCs were isolated from the femurs of 6 Wistar donor (6-weeks-old male) rats (100±20 g), BM-MSCs isolation and propagation occur in 14 days before experimental procedures under aseptic conditions as previously described17. Briefly, bone marrow was harvested by flushing the femurs with Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM, GIBCO/BRL) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine medium (GIBCO/BRL). Cells were isolated with a density gradient [Ficoll/Paque (Pharmacia)] and cultured in culture medium supplemented with 1% penicillin-streptomycin (GIBCO/BRL) at 37°C in a humidified 5% CO2 incubator. When large colonies developed (80–90% confluence), cultures were washed twice with phosphate buffer saline (PBS) and cells were trypsinized with 0.25% trypsin in 1 mM EDTA (GIBCO/BRL) for 5 minutes at 37°C. After centrifugation (at 2400 rpm for 20 minutes), cells were re-suspended with serum-supplemented medium and incubated in 50 cm2 culture flask Falcon. On day 14, the adherent colonies of cells were trypsinized, and counted.17. Cultures confluence was monitored by inverted light microscope (Olympus, USA) with a digital camera (Nikon, Japan).
Surface antigens CD90 and CD34 were detected by flow cytometry to allow identification of BM-MSCs as follows. Following blocking in 0.5% BSA and 2% FBS in PBS, 100,000 cells were incubated in the dark at 4°C for 20 min with the following monoclonal antibodies; FITC CD 90 (PN IM1839U; Beckman Coulter), PE CD 34 (PN IM1871U; Beckman Coulter, USA). Mouse isotype PE antibody (Beckman Coulter, USA) were used as controls (dilution of all antibodies, 1:1500). Cells were washed and suspended in 500 µl fluorescence activated cell sorting (FACS) buffer and analyzed using a Cytomics FC 500 flow cytometer (Beckman Coulter, USA) using CPX software version 2.2. BM-MSCs osteogenic differentiation was induced by StemPro osteogenic induction medium; incubation for 7 days at the third passage, 1 × 103 cells/each well by osteocyte StemPro osteogenesis differentiation kit (Gibco, Life Technology) at concentration 300 µl of osteogenic medium (stempro medium) and identified by alizarin red staining (Sigma-Aldrich) for 30 min at room temprature, the mineralized nodules were stained and monitored using inverted light microscope (Olympus, USA) with a digital camera (Nikon, Japan). The results were presented by descriptive analysis.
The surgical approach was under general anaesthesia via intramuscular injection of 50-75 mg/kg ketamine chlorohydrate (Amoun CO) and 20 mg/ Kg body weight xylazine HCL (Xyla-Ject®, PhoenixTM, Pharmaceutical Inc.) in the proximal–medial area of each tibia. While blood samples were being prepared, a 3-mm diameter bone defect was created using a round surgical bur3 under constant irrigation with saline solution in both tibiae of the same animal (split-body design) to avoid selection bias and neutralize any confounders that may affect the outcomes of both treatments. Experimental groups were standardized among all the animals: group A, left tibia defect received PRF clot immediately placed by sterile tweezers in the defect; Group B, right tibia of the same animal received BM-MSCs seeded on chitosan scaffold then implanted in the tibial bone defect using sterile spatula. Both groups were randomly sub-divided according to time of euthanasia into three sub-groups (1, 2 and 3); at 3, 10 days and 3 weeks, respectively (n = 12) (Table 1). Postoperatively, periosteum flaps and skin were sutured. Anti-inflammatories and antibiotics were applied on the skin and injected for 3 days. Each animal received IM 10 mg/kg flumox (Eipico, Egypt) to avoid secondary bacterial infection, 10 mg/kg cataflam (Novartis, Egypt) to relieve postoperative pain and topical antibiotic spray; Bivatracin (Egyptian Company For Advanced Pharma, Egypt) to avoid local infection. The animals were euthanized by intra-cardiac overdose of sodium thiopental (80 mg/kg).
To obtain a porous chitosan scaffold to deliver BM-MSCs into the defect, 1 g chitosan (Merck Germany) was dissolved in 200 µl 0.2% M acetic acid , stored for 1 day at room temperature, poured into a 3-mm diameter stainless steel circular mould, stored in deep freezer at −70°C for 5 days, then lyophilized for 3 days as follows. In the lyophiliser (Thermo Fisher Scientific), there were three phases of preparation. The first phase was freezing phase, where the sample was exposed to −40°C in a vacuum for 10 min. The second phase was warm up vacuum pump phase, where sample was exposed to −15°C in a vacuum for 20 min. The third phase was main drying phase, where sample was exposed to 30°C in a vacuum for 3 days; after the 3 days, a blank porous chitosan scaffold was prepared18,19.
Prior to cell seeding, the lyophilized scaffolds were immersed in absolute ethanol for sterilization. Hydration was accomplished by sequential immersion in serially diluted ethanol solutions of 70, 50, and 25%, during intervals of 30 min each. Scaffolds were finally equilibrated in PBS followed by standard culture medium (30 min; 3 times), and then placed in tissue culture plates ready to be seeded. BM-MSCs were seeded at a density of 2.5x106 cells/scaffold under static conditions, by means of a cell suspension. The seeded scaffold was then placed in the defect to deliver the stem cells to the defect, which was then sutured closed.
A total of 2 ml venous blood was drawn from the caudal vein of rats used in the experiment into a plain tube and immediately centrifuged at room temperature with a lab centrifuge (Electronic centrifuge 800, China) for 10 min at 3000 rpm20. In the middle of the tube, a fibrin clot was formed between the supernatant acellular plasma and the lower red corpuscles. The PRF clot was detached using sterile tweezers applied to the bone defect.
Tibiae were carefully dissected free from soft tissue; bone specimens of each group were sectioned using a disc in low speed hand piece under constant irrigation to include the entire defect sites. Specimens were placed in 2.5% buffered glutaraldehyde solution (pH 4.7) for 6 hours. Then, dehydrated in increasing concentrations of ethanol (50, 70, 85, 95 and 100%) for 10 minutes at each concentration. Finally, they were mounted on EM stubs and examined using SEM (Model Quanta 250 FEG FEI Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA, with accelerating voltage 30 K.V., magnification14–1,000,000× and resolution for Gun.1n). The EDX analysis system works as an integrated feature of SEM Quanta FEG 250 attached with EDX unit, (FEI Company, Netherlands). EDX analysis of the bone surfaces was performed, the elemental distribution of phosphorus and calcium (expressed as weight percentage) were determined. Composition scans were collected at randomly selected points in the bone surfaces of the defect using the backscattered electron mode. Data were obtained by calculating the mean of ten independent determinations21.
One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to compare different observation times within the same group. This was followed by Tukey’s post hoc test when the difference was found to be significant. A t-test was used to compare between both groups using IBM SPSS 18.0 version 21 for windows (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). The significance level was set at p ≤ 0.05.
Cells were rounded non-adhesive isolated bone marrow cells (Figure 1a). Adhesive cells started to get fusiform spindle shaped fibroblast like cells. Cell confluence was 30–40% (Figure 1b). Cells became adhesive fusiform spindle shaped fibroblast like cells. Cell confluence was 50–70% (Figure 1c). Cells were long and spindle-shaped, reaching the highest confluence (90%) at 14 days (Figure 1d). BM-MSCs were negative for CD34 and positive for CD90 (>98.7%) (Figure 2). BM-MSCs were positively stained with alizarin red (Figure 3).
Fibro-cellular tissue and traces of PRF material were seen in sub-group A1 (Figure 4). In sub-group A2, along the margins, bone was actively forming; blood vessels were seen to be emerging and inserted close to the newly formed bone. PRF remnants were observed in the defect centre (Figure 5). Sub-group A3 revealed spongy-like pattern with abundant non-remodelled vascular spaces containing fibro-cellular tissue. In addition, bone formation extended beyond the perimeter of the original defect site compared to sub-group A2 (Figure 6). In sub-group B1, numerous vessels appeared, along with dis-organized architecture of newly formed bone (Figure 7). The bone in sub-group B2 was nearly restored, with new bone extending partly beyond the perimeter of the defect (Figure 8). Sub-group B3 revealed more organized bone architecture; well-oriented thick and smooth interconnecting bone trabeculae with large-centred vascular space. Many blood vessels were noticed. The borders between the newly formed bone and the pre-existing old bone were almost remodeled; no longer detectable in most areas and cannot be distinguished from the cortical surroundings (Figure 9). Raw EDX data are shown in Dataset 122.
There was significant increase in the mean calcium and phosphorous weight percentage of group B relative to group A at all-time intervals. Moreover, calcium and phosphorus weight percent mean value increased by time in both groups (Figure 10 and Table 2–Table 5).
Bone regeneration using BMSCs was very well reported and standardized in many protocols, Donzelli et al., 2007 showed that the adult rat bone marrow was a suitable source for MSCs that can be easily induced to differentiate into an osteogenic lineage, so they are thought to be a promising candidate, supporting cells for bone reconstruction23. Most in vitro and many in vivo studies have proposed that MSCs possess the ability to increase osteoinduction and osteogenesis24–27.
Through the current study, BM-MSCs and PRF promoted bone regeneration; where the newly formed bone was almost remodelled and integrated into the surrounding old bone with well-vascularized fibro-cellular tissue. In addition, evidence of osteogenesis was reflected by the presence of blood vessels. However, there was an improved bone regenerative capacity in defects treated with BM-MSCs compared to those treated with PRF. SEM-EDX analysis revealed a significant increase in the mean calcium and phosphorous weight percentage in the BM-MSCs group relative to the PRF group at all-time intervals.
Considering PRF, growth factors released are postulated to be promoters of tissue regeneration, tissue vascularity, mitosis of MSCs and osteoblasts and rate of collagen formation, playing a key role in the rate and extent of bone formation28. This would help explain the significant increase in calcium and phosphorus weight percentage in the PRF group through the experiment.
Accordingly, there was a marked drop in elemental analysis of calcium and phosphorous in sub-group A1, that increased gradually in sub-groups A2 and A3. This can be explained by the findings of a previous study on the pattern of growth factor release where PRF sustained long-term release of TGF-1 and PDGF-AB that peaked at day 14, which led to increase mineralization then decreased mildly but had a delayed peak of release11.
The BM-MSC-treated group exhibited more organized bone architecture than the PRF-treated group; sub-group B3 exhibited well-oriented thick and smooth interconnecting bone trabeculae filling the defect compared to sub-group A3; which revealed spongy-like pattern with abundant non-remodelled vascular spaces containing fibro-cellular tissue. The proposed mechanism through which BM-MSCs contribute to bone regeneration enhancement is via maturation into osteoblasts in vivo, or via an indirect pathway by paracrine effects on host stem or progenitor cells29. Notably, a significant increase in the mean calcium and phosphorus weight percentage was observed in BM-MSC-treated group at all time intervals throughout the experiment when compared with the corresponding PRF group. In accordance with the findings of a previous study, SEM/EDX analysis of osteogenic differentiated MSCs seeded on collagen scaffold demonstrated that calcium co-localized with phosphorous, with a gradual increase of both chemical elements observed from day 7 up to very high levels at day 2823. In conclusion, we confirmed that PRF yielded inferior bone formation to that by BM-MSCs after implantation in rat tibiae.
Dataset 1. Raw data for EDX analysis and flow cytometry gating graphs for identification of BM-MSCs. Also included are raw SEM images. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.15985.d21854822.
Views | Downloads | |
---|---|---|
F1000Research | - | - |
PubMed Central
Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.
|
- | - |
Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?
Yes
Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?
Yes
Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?
Yes
If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?
Yes
Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?
Yes
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?
Yes
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?
Yes
Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?
Yes
Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?
Yes
If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?
Yes
Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?
Yes
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?
Yes
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?
Yes
Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?
Yes
Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?
Yes
If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?
Yes
Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?
Yes
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?
Yes
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?
Yes
Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?
Yes
Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?
Yes
If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?
Yes
Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?
Yes
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?
Yes
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
Invited Reviewers | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |
Version 1 28 Sep 18 |
read | read | read | read |
Click here to access the data.
Spreadsheet data files may not format correctly if your computer is using different default delimiters (symbols used to separate values into separate cells) - a spreadsheet created in one region is sometimes misinterpreted by computers in other regions. You can change the regional settings on your computer so that the spreadsheet can be interpreted correctly.
Provide sufficient details of any financial or non-financial competing interests to enable users to assess whether your comments might lead a reasonable person to question your impartiality. Consider the following examples, but note that this is not an exhaustive list:
Sign up for content alerts and receive a weekly or monthly email with all newly published articles
Already registered? Sign in
The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.
You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.
To sign in, please click here.
If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.
You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.
To sign in, please click here.
If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.
If your email address is registered with us, we will email you instructions to reset your password.
If you think you should have received this email but it has not arrived, please check your spam filters and/or contact for further assistance.
Comments on this article Comments (0)