Sommer CA and Wilcox CM. Pancreatico-pericardial fistula as a complication of chronic pancreatitis [version 1; peer review: 2 approved]. F1000Research 2014, 3:31 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.3-31.v1)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
1Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, BDB 380, USA
OPEN PEER REVIEW
REVIEWER STATUS
Abstract
Pancreatico-pericardial fistula is an extremely rare complication of chronic pancreatitis. We present a case of a 58-year-old man who presented with syncope. Transthoracic echocardiogram revealed a pericardial effusion with tamponade physiology. Pericardiocentesis and pericardial fluid analysis demonstrated a lipase level of 2321 U/L. Subsequently, an endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) was performed, confirming the presence of a pancreatico-pericardial fistula (PPF) from the distal body of the pancreas. A pancreatic duct stent was placed across the duct disruption on two separate occasions; however, despite stent placement, the patient continued to re-accumulate pericardial fluid and deteriorated. While rare, PPFs may complicate chronic pancreatitis, may not respond to pancreatic duct stenting and may portend a poor prognosis.
Pancreatic fistulas are a well-recognized complication of pancreatitis. They result from leakage of pancreatic enzymes from a disrupted pancreatic duct associated with acute or chronic pancreatitis, partial pancreatectomy, or injury to the pancreatic duct during surgery. Other causes include pancreatic biopsy and blunt abdominal trauma. Fluid collections develop from persistent leakage of pancreatic enzymes with subsequent erosion through the wall of the bowel and into a nearby hollow viscus (colon, duodenum, stomach, or esophagus), where they communicate with peritoneal or pleural cavities causing effusions in the pleural space, mediastinum, lesser sac, retroperitoneum, or perihepatic space. We report a rare case of pancreatico-pericardial fistula (PPF) presenting as syncope in a patient with chronic alcoholic pancreatitis.
Case report
A 58 year-old black male presented with syncope related to orthostatic hypotension. He had sustained a laceration and multiple facial fractures involving the zygomatic arch and right orbit. He reported feeling weak with dyspnea on minimal exertion for several days prior to this syncopal event. He denied any abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting or chest pain. He had a history of delirium tremens post alcohol cessation and previous episodes of acute pancreatitis over the last two years. Prior surgical history was notable for an exploratory laparotomy in 1985 after sustaining a gunshot wound to the abdomen. He was on no medications on admission. He had an ongoing history of alcohol dependence (3 glasses of whisky daily) and was drinking earlier on the day of his presentation (ethanol level 178 mg/dl). He denied any family history of pancreatic disease.
On admission, his vital signs were normal without tachycardia or hypotension. Facial trauma was evident. On auscultation he had rales at both lung bases. There were no abnormalities noted on his cardiovascular exam. He had moderate ascites with an obvious fluid wave but no hepatosplenomegaly. Pertinent laboratory findings included: hemoglobin 7.7 g/dL (normal range 14–18 g/dl) and hematocrit 23.5% (normal range 40–54%). The remainder of his blood count was normal. His total bilirubin was 1.3 mg/dl (normal range 0.3–1.2 mg/dl), aspartate aminotransferase (AST) 130 U/L (normal range 15–46 U/L) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) was 28 U/L (normal range 11–66 U/L) with albumin of 2.2 g/dl (normal range 3.5–5 g/dl). Alkaline phosphatase (ALP) was within normal limits. Electrolytes on admission were also normal. Prothrombin time (PT) and INR were 22.9 seconds (normal <12.5s) and 2.08 (normal <1.11), respectively. His serum amylase concentration the day after admission was 386 U/L (normal range 30–110 U/L). He was admitted to the Medicine Intensive Care Unit for treatment of syncope, pancreatitis, and anemia.
Computed tomography (CT) of his head revealed multiple fractures involving the right posterior lateral wall of the right maxillary sinus, zygomatic arch and lateral wall of the right orbit, without intracranial hemorrhage. The admission chest X-ray demonstrated cardiomegaly without evidence of pneumonia or pulmonary edema. Overnight, the patient became confused and tachypneic and his oxygen saturation fell to 85%. A transthoracic echocardiogram was subsequently performed on the day after admission to evaluate for dilated cardiomyopathy or pericardial effusion. A large pericardial effusion was seen with systolic right atrial collapse, diastolic right ventricular collapse and left atrial collapse. Pericardiocentesis was performed with removal of 4.2 liters of straw-colored fluid and resolution of the tamponade. Fluid analysis showed: red blood cell count 573/mm3, white blood cell count 13/mm3, amylase 633 μ/L, and lipase 2321 μ/L. Despite pericardiocentesis, a repeat chest X-ray on the day after admission showed worsening cardiomegaly and a repeat echocardiogram showed re-accumulation of the fluid and an additional 1800 cc was drained over the next two days; a pericardial drain was subsequently placed.
An abdominal ultrasound three days after admission showed mild ascites and a cirrhotic liver without portal vein thrombosis. The patient was also found to have hepatitis C by blood testing. A CT of the chest, abdomen and pelvis revealed a persistent large low-attenuating pericardial effusion with the pericardial drain entering the left paramedian subcostal region with the tip terminating at the level of the ascending aorta (Figure 1); large bilateral, left greater than right, pleural effusions were also present. Changes of chronic pancreatitis were present with irregular and dilated ducts with numerous calcifications (Figure 2). There was no evidence radiographically of acute pancreatitis. The pancreatic parenchyma was homogenously enhancing. There was a moderate amount of low-attenuating free intraperitoneal fluid but no discrete peripancreatic fluid collection or stranding.
Figure 1. CT Chest.
Large pericardial and pleural effusions. The tip of the drain is shown in the pericardial space.
Figure 2. CT Abdomen.
Calcifications within the pancreas are shown by arrows.
The patient continued to have a re-accumulating pericardial effusion with over 12 L removed over the ensuing several days. The cardiothoracic surgery service was consulted regarding a pericardial window, but the patient was felt to be a poor surgical candidate and too high-risk for the procedure given his co-morbidities. A technetium-labeled macro-aggregated albumin shunt study was performed five days after admission through the pericardial drain to evaluate for communication and there was no scintigraphic evidence for radiotracer communication from the pericardium into the abdomen or pelvis.
Despite a pericardioplasty, the patient continued to have persistent pericardial drainage. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatogram (ERCP) was performed for suspected PPF. A scout image showed numerous calcifications throughout the pancreas that were consistent with chronic pancreatitis. After biliary sphincterotomy, the pancreatic duct was selectively cannulated and revealed numerous small stones and a diffusely dilated pancreatic duct to the tail. A leak was observed in the distal pancreatic body just proximal to the pancreatic neck (Figure 3). The fistula was seen coursing cranially surrounding a circular structure, consistent with the pericardium (Figure 4). As the ERCP contrast agent was continually injected under fluoroscopy, cardiac contractions were observed. A 7-French × 15 cm pancreatic duct stent was placed to the tail, bridging the leak.
Figure 3. Calcifications consistent with chronic pancreatitis.
Pancreatic fistula is shown by the arrows.
Figure 4. Pancreaticopericardial fistula coursing cranially surrounded a circular sac, consistent with the pericardium.
Nevertheless, the patient continued to have 3 L of output from the pericardial drain daily. A repeat CT did not show any focal peripancreatic fluid collection or tract and no visible collection or tract was seen between the pancreas and diaphragm for percutaneous drain placement to be possible. A second ERCP was subsequently performed with exchange of the stent. The fistulous tract was again noted from the neck, tracking cranially, and a 7 Fr pancreatic stent was again placed bridging the leak.
The patient continued to decline despite maximal medical therapy. While hospitalized, over 50 L of fluid was removed from the pericardial drain. He did not respond to pericardial drainage nor to treatment of pansensitive Escherichia coli that was cultured from the pericardial fluid. He was also treated with antibiotics for concurrent pneumonia and a urinary tract infection. Eventually, the patient opted for a change in his goals of care to comfort care and was transferred to hospice and expired.
Discussion
Disruption of the pancreatic duct leads to leakage of pancreatic juice and formation of an acute fluid collection or pseudocyst. Communication to other structures can occur either indirectly, originating from a pseudocyst, or directly in the form of fistulas. Internal pancreatic fistulas result from erosion of pancreatic fluid into adjacent or distant organs whereas external fistulas drain into a defect in the skin. If the communication occurs anteriorly into the peritoneal cavity, pancreatic ascites may occur.
In most reported cases of internal pancreatic fistulas, thoracopancreatic communication occurs into the pleural space causing a pleural effusion and patients usually present with dyspnea1. Although there have been reports of mediastinal extension of pseudocysts2–5, to our knowledge only four cases of PPFs have been reported in the medical literature6–9.
The presenting symptoms can be variable depending on the location and size of the communication. Thus, patients may present with dyspnea, chest pain, palpitations, or dysphagia; sometimes with hemoptysis, acute respiratory compromise, or cardiogenic shock. Our patient presented with syncope and reported no chest or abdominal symptoms. It was only when his pericardial effusion was analysed and found to have elevated amylase and lipase concentrations that a pancreatic origin was suspected.
A number of techniques may be used to establish the diagnosis of pancreatic fistula. Cross-sectional abdominal imaging by computed tomography may often be suggestive, especially if a pancreatic pseudocyst or peripancreatic fluid is observed. More recently, magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography has been used to delineate the pancreatic duct and even to identify the fistulous tract. A variety of radiologic imaging studies were performed on our patient, including abdominal ultrasound, transthoracic echocardiogram, CT, and a technetium-labeled macroaggregated albumin shunt study, none of which were able to detect or confirm the presence of the pancreatico-pericardial fistula. ERCP is the diagnostic test of choice and offers the potential for therapy for fistulas as stenting the disrupted duct is a viable and effective therapeutic option10–15.
The treatment of pancreatic fistulas is based primarily on case reports and small observational studies16. Optimizing nutritional status and limiting oral intake may be effective with small leaks. Octreotide, a potent inhibitor of pancreatic secretion, has also been used in some small studies with efficacy16. The therapy most commonly recommended, however, is endoscopic stenting by ERCP17,18. One randomized study in patients with pancreatic duct disruption associated with necrotizing pancreatitis, however, found no significant difference between conservative and endoscopic treatment17. In the study by Kozarek et al.19, of 18 patients with pancreatic duct leaks (14 of which had associated fluid collections) who were treated with transpapillary pancreatic duct drains or stents, 7 patients required surgery for ongoing pancreatic pain or residual/recurrent fluid collections. The complications were the result of exacerbated symptoms of pancreatitis and stent occlusion leading to recurrent pancreatitis or recurrent duct blowout with pseudocyst. Covered self-expanding metal stents have been successfully used in the main pancreatic duct to manage duct disruptions and leaks20. A retrospective study of those with pancreaticopleural fistula who underwent ERCP and stenting as the primary treatment found successful treatment in only one of eight cases, mostly due to abnormal or difficult anatomy21. Location of duct disruption has been the only suggested predictor of who would best benefit from stenting for pancreatic duct leak1. Despite identifying the ductal leak and stenting twice, the leak in our patient did not resolve. If the leak persists after 2–4 weeks of conservative and endoscopic therapy, surgery may be required depending on the site of the leak. In one patient, surgical detachment of the fistula and Roux-en-Y decompression of the pancreatic duct resulted in a cure of the condition6.
In the medical literature, there is a report that described the case of a 16 year-old male who was found to have tropical calcific pancreatitis and underwent a lateral pancreatico-jejunostomy with Roux-en-Y loop performed after initial pericardiocentesis and was reported to be doing well six months later7. Another report described an adult patient who underwent an elective Roux-en-Y pancreatico-jejunostomy without complication and remained symptom-free two years after surgery8. Unfortunately, our patient had untreated cirrhosis due to hepatitis C and alcohol misuse, and had continued to consume alcohol up until the day of admission, and was deemed a poor surgical candidate. Another more recent case describes a PPF diagnosed by ERCP in a patient with acute alcoholic pancreatitis with successful stent placement in a disrupted pancreatic duct. Prior to diagnosis, the patient had been treated with intrapericardial triamcinolone and octreotide, but the pericardial effusion reccurred9.
Pancreatico-pericardial fistula is a very rare complication of pancreatitis and rapid and accurate diagnosis of this life-threatening complication is crucial. As our case demonstrates, endoscopic therapy may not be effective.
Consent
As the patient died and it was not possible to locate the patient’s family, the authors obtained written permission for publication of clinical details and clinical images from Prof. Klaus Monkemuller, Chief of Endoscopy at the University of Alabama at Birmingham Hospital, where the patient was managed. Prof. Monkemuller has confirmed the absence of patient identifiers ensuring protection of any patient related information.
Author contributions
Camille Anne Sommer, M.D., and C. Mel Wilcox, M.D. M.S.P.H., wrote the manuscript, reviewed the figures and finalized the draft.
Competing interests
No competing interests were disclosed.
Grant information
The author(s) declared that no grants were involved in supporting this work.
Faculty Opinions recommended
References
1.
Iacono C, Procacci C, Frigo F, et al.:
Thoracic complications of pancreatitis.
Pancreas.
1989; 4(2): 228–236. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
2.
Ajmera AV, Judge TA:
Mediastinal extension of pancreatic pseudocyst--a case with review of topic and management guidelines.
Am J Ther.
2012; 19(5): e152–e156. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
3.
Imai Y, Taniguchi M, Tagawa K, et al.:
A case of chronic pancreatitis complicated by massive pericardial and right pleural effusion.
Gastroenterol Jpn.
1993; 28(5): 734–738. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
4.
Tan MH, Kirk G, Archibold P, et al.:
Cardiac compromise due to a pancreatic mediastinal pseudocyst.
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol.
2002; 14(11): 1279–82. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
5.
Komtong S, Chanatrirattanapan R, Kongkam P, et al.:
Mediastinal pseudocyst with pericardial effusion and dysphagia treated by endoscopic drainage.
JOP.
2006; 7(4): 405–10. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
6.
Davidson ED, Horney JT, Salter PP 3rd:
Internal pancreatic fistula to the pericardium and pleura.
Surgery.
1979; 85(4): 478–80. PubMed Abstract
7.
Balasubramanian P, Jeyamani R, Govil S, et al.:
Pancreatico-pericardial fistula: a rare complication of chronic pancreatitis.
Indian J Gastroenterol.
2004; 23(1): 31–32. PubMed Abstract
8.
Ching SS, Rao MM, Ali A, et al.:
Chronic pancreatitis complicated by pancreaticopericardial fistula.
Surgical Practice.
2007; 11(3): 130–133. Publisher Full Text
10.
Schoonjans R, Vandewoude K, Cesmeli E, et al.:
Recurrent pericardial effusion as a result of chronic pancreatitis. Successful treatment with somatostatin.
J Clin Gastroenterol.
1996; 23(3): 224–7. PubMed Abstract
11.
Chebli JM, Gaburri PD, de Souza AF, et al.:
Internal pancreatic fistulas: proposal of a management algorithm based on a case series analysis.
J Clin Gastroenterol.
2004; 38(9): 795–800. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
13.
Garcia-Ricart F, Croizet O, El Riwini M, et al.:
Endoscopic management of a persistent pancreatopleural fistula.
Gastrointest Endosc.
1997; 46(4): 359–61. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
14.
Pai CG, Suvarna D, Bhat G:
Endoscopic treatment as first-line therapy for pancreatic ascites and pleural effusion.
J Gastroenterol Hepatol.
2009; 24(7): 1198–202. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
15.
Tanaka T, Kuroki T, Kitasato A, et al.:
Endoscopic transpapillary pancreatic stenting for internal pancreatic fistula with the disruption of the pancreatic ductal system.
Pancreatology.
2013; 13(6): 621–4. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
17.
Bakker OJ, van Baal MC, van Santvoort HC, et al.:
Endoscopic transpapillary stenting or conservative treatment for pancreatic fistulas in necrotizing pancreatitis: multicenter series and literature review.
Ann Surg.
2011; 253(5): 961–7. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
18.
de-Madaria E, Abad-González A, Aparicio JR, et al.:
The Spanish Pancreatic Club’s recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of chronic pancreatitis: Part 2 (treatment).
Pancreatology.
2013; 13(1): 18–28. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
19.
Kozarek RA, Ball TJ, Patterson DJ, et al.:
Endoscopic transpapillary therapy for disrupted pancreatic duct and peripancreatic fluid collections.
Gastroenterology.
1991; 100(5 Pt 1): 1362–70. PubMed Abstract
20.
Akbar A, Baron TH:
Covered self-expanding metal stent use in the pancreatic duct: a case series.
Endoscopy.
2012; 44(9): 869–73. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
KUMAR JAYANT, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
07 Feb 2014
Reader Comment
Good one, nicely presented, but few clarifications 1) Duration of drinking? 2) Incidence of fistula formation after blunt trauma abdomen and chronic pancreatitis?
Competing Interests:No competing interest.
Good one, nicely presented, but few clarifications 1) Duration of drinking? 2) Incidence of fistula formation after blunt trauma abdomen and chronic pancreatitis?
Good one, nicely presented, but few clarifications 1) Duration of drinking? 2) Incidence of fistula formation after blunt trauma abdomen and chronic pancreatitis?
Sommer CA and Wilcox CM. Pancreatico-pericardial fistula as a complication of chronic pancreatitis [version 1; peer review: 2 approved] F1000Research 2014, 3:31 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.3-31.v1)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
track
receive updates on this article
Track an article to receive email alerts on any updates to this article.
Share
Open Peer Review
Current Reviewer Status:
?
Key to Reviewer Statuses
VIEWHIDE
ApprovedThe paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations
A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approvedFundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions
This is a well written case report about a patient presenting with syncope due to a pancreatic-pericardial fistula, a rare complication of chronic pancreatitis that has been reported for only a handful of patients in the literature. Multiple noninvasive diagnostic
... Continue reading
This is a well written case report about a patient presenting with syncope due to a pancreatic-pericardial fistula, a rare complication of chronic pancreatitis that has been reported for only a handful of patients in the literature. Multiple noninvasive diagnostic tests failed to detect the fistula. ERCP proved diagnostic, showing a leak of contrast from the distal pancreatic body coursing to and surrounding a circular structure in the chest. There are no controlled data or guidelines for management of pancreatic-pleural fistula but general treatment options include watchful waiting for spontaneous resolution, medical therapy (octreotide, nasojejunal feeding, total parenteral nutrition), or drainage internally or externally by endoscopic, percutaneous, or surgical approaches. The patient was too symptomatic from the pericardial effusion to offer observation alone and he was not fit for surgery due to his comorbid illnesses. Endoscopic stent placement is a very reasonable option and potentially a first-line therapy based on the excellent outcomes reported by case series for management of pancreatic-pleural fistula and in the single of 4 cases of pancreatic-pericardial fistula offered this treatment modality. It should be noted that those having a fistula between the pericardium and a (peri)pancreatic pseudocyst, which was absent in this case, may be offered endoscopic cystenterostomy. Unfortunately, this patient failed to respond to endoscopic stenting across the body of the pancreatic duct, based on having an unremitting, large pericardial drain output of approximately 3 Liters per day of pancreatic juice. Why this particular patient did not respond is unclear. It should be emphasized that the patient underwent stent change, essentially excluding a clogged or malpositioned stent as a cause for failed therapy. Moreover, we speculate that fistula pathophysiology and perhaps the response to transpapillary or bridging pancreatic duct stenting differs between pancreatic-pleural and pancreatic-pericardial types of fistula and that the extreme, high output fistula in this particular patient would doom any treatment modality that did not include surgery.
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
We confirm that we have read this submission and believe that we have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard.
This case report serves to remind us of a rare but potentially devastating complication of chronic pancreatitis, and one that unfortunately does not respond well to endoscopic management. Given the comorbities, this patient was not appropriate for surgical management.
The authors
... Continue reading
This case report serves to remind us of a rare but potentially devastating complication of chronic pancreatitis, and one that unfortunately does not respond well to endoscopic management. Given the comorbities, this patient was not appropriate for surgical management.
The authors also discuss the role of octreotide in the management of pancreatic fistulae. It would be interesting to know whether octreotide was used in conjunction with pancreatic duct stenting in this case. Given the drainage volume, I suspect it would have been of little benefit if used.
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard.
KUMAR JAYANT, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
07 Feb 2014
Reader Comment
Good one, nicely presented, but few clarifications 1) Duration of drinking? 2) Incidence of fistula formation after blunt trauma abdomen and chronic pancreatitis?
Competing Interests:No competing interest.
Good one, nicely presented, but few clarifications 1) Duration of drinking? 2) Incidence of fistula formation after blunt trauma abdomen and chronic pancreatitis?
Good one, nicely presented, but few clarifications 1) Duration of drinking? 2) Incidence of fistula formation after blunt trauma abdomen and chronic pancreatitis?
Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
Approved - the paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations -
A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approved - fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions
Adjust parameters to alter display
View on desktop for interactive features
Includes Interactive Elements
View on desktop for interactive features
Competing Interests Policy
Provide sufficient details of any financial or non-financial competing interests to enable users to assess whether your comments might lead a reasonable person to question your impartiality. Consider the following examples, but note that this is not an exhaustive list:
Examples of 'Non-Financial Competing Interests'
Within the past 4 years, you have held joint grants, published or collaborated with any of the authors of the selected paper.
You have a close personal relationship (e.g. parent, spouse, sibling, or domestic partner) with any of the authors.
You are a close professional associate of any of the authors (e.g. scientific mentor, recent student).
You work at the same institute as any of the authors.
You hope/expect to benefit (e.g. favour or employment) as a result of your submission.
You are an Editor for the journal in which the article is published.
Examples of 'Financial Competing Interests'
You expect to receive, or in the past 4 years have received, any of the following from any commercial organisation that may gain financially from your submission: a salary, fees, funding, reimbursements.
You expect to receive, or in the past 4 years have received, shared grant support or other funding with any of the authors.
You hold, or are currently applying for, any patents or significant stocks/shares relating to the subject matter of the paper you are commenting on.
Stay Updated
Sign up for content alerts and receive a weekly or monthly email with all newly published articles
1) Duration of drinking?
2) Incidence of fistula formation after blunt trauma abdomen and chronic pancreatitis?
1) Duration of drinking?
2) Incidence of fistula formation after blunt trauma abdomen and chronic pancreatitis?
1) Duration of drinking?
2) Incidence of fistula formation after blunt trauma abdomen and chronic pancreatitis?