Abstract

Using a computerized test system, we compared binocular and monocular visual optotype acuity, varying both contrast and contrast disparity between the two eyes. When contrast was the same in the two eyes, binocular acuity was better than best monocular acuity by an average of 0.045 log minimum angle of resolution, or 11%. When contrast differed in the two eyes, binocular acuity in most but not all cases was still better than the monocular acuity of the eye that received the higher contrast. This binocular advantage became smaller but remained significant as contrast disparity became larger. These results are most simply explained by threshold contrast summation of high-spatial-frequency letter components.

© 1993 Optical Society of America

Binocular summation in vernier acuity

Tom Banton and Dennis M. Levi
J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 8(4) 673-680 (1991)

Binocular contrast inhibition in subjects with age-related macular degeneration

Arne Valberg and Per Fosse
J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 19(1) 223-228 (2002)

Binocular visual performance and summation after correcting higher order aberrations

Ramkumar Sabesan, Len Zheleznyak, and Geunyoung Yoon
Biomed. Opt. Express 3(12) 3176-3189 (2012)

Comparison of binocular through-focus visual acuity with monovision and a small aperture inlay

Christina Schwarz, Silvestre Manzanera, Pedro M. Prieto, Enrique J. Fernández, and Pablo Artal
Biomed. Opt. Express 5(10) 3355-3366 (2014)

Binocular processes in vernier acuity

Alexander J. Mussap and Dennis M. Levi
J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 12(2) 225-233 (1995)