Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Open Access

Peer-reviewed

Research Article

Platelet Function in Stored Heparinised Autologous Blood Is Not Superior to in Patient Platelet Function during Routine Cardiopulmonary Bypass

  • Rolf C. G. Gallandat Huet ,

    r.c.g.huet@anest.umcg.nl

    Affiliation Department of Anesthesiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, The Netherlands

    ⨯
  • Adrianus J. de Vries,

    Affiliation Department of Anesthesiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, The Netherlands

    ⨯
  • Vladimir Cernak,

    Affiliation Department of Anesthesiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, The Netherlands

    ⨯
  • Ton Lisman

    Affiliation Surgical Research Laboratory, Dept of Surgery, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands

    ⨯

Abstract

Background

In cardiac surgery, cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and unfractionated heparin have negative effects on blood platelet function. In acute normovolemic haemodilution autologous unfractionated heparinised blood is stored ex-vivo and retransfused at the end of the procedure to reduce (allogeneic) transfusion requirements. In this observational study we assessed whether platelet function is better preserved in ex vivo stored autologous blood compared to platelet function in the patient during CPB.

Methodology/Principal Finding

We measured platelet aggregation responses pre-CPB, 5 min after the start of CPB, at the end of CPB, and after unfractionated heparin reversal, using multiple electrode aggregometry (Multiplate®) with adenosine diphosphate (ADP), thrombin receptor activating peptide (TRAP) and ristocetin activated test cells. We compared blood samples taken from the patient with samples taken from 100 ml ex-vivo stored blood, which we took to mimick blood storage during normovolemic haemodilution. Platelet function declined both in ex-vivo stored blood as well as in blood taken from the patient. At the end of CPB there were no differences in platelet aggregation responses between samples from the ex vivo stored blood and the patient.

Conclusion/Significance

Ex vivo preservation of autologous blood in unfractionated heparin does not seem to be profitable to preserve platelet function.

Citation: Gallandat Huet RCG, de Vries AJ, Cernak V, Lisman T (2012) Platelet Function in Stored Heparinised Autologous Blood Is Not Superior to in Patient Platelet Function during Routine Cardiopulmonary Bypass. PLoS ONE 7(3): e33686. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0033686

Editor: Mercedes Susan Mandell, University of Colorado, United States of America

Received: December 22, 2011; Accepted: February 15, 2012; Published: March 19, 2012

Copyright: © 2012 Gallandat Huet et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Funding: NODIA BV provided utensils (www.nodia.be/node/17). No additional external funding received for this study. The funder had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Competing interests: NODIA BV provided utensils, but this does not alter the authors' adherence to all the PLoS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.

Introduction

Cardiac surgery is associated with blood platelet dysfunction and perioperative coagulation disturbances [1], [2]. The use of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) (resulting in haemodilution, hemostasis activation by contact with foreign surfaces and tissue factor liberation), blood suction, and the concomitant upregulation of inflammatory pathways all contribute to the activation and mechanical destruction of platelets [3], [4]. Moreover, vasodilatation, and blood loss contribute to a coagulopathic status at the end of surgery. Unfractionated heparin is universally used to anticoagulate patients during CPB, but also to prevent or treat other systemic thrombotic complications. Unfractionated heparin has long been known to possess platelet activating properties, but only recently it has been demonstrated that unfractionated heparin promotes platelet responsiveness via its ability to initiate αIIbβ3-mediated outside-in signaling [5]. During cardiac surgery several techniques are advocated to preserve coagulation factors and platelet function, in order to reduce allogeneic transfusion. These techniques include intra-operative platelet anesthesia [6], [7], platelet-rich plasma harvesting [8] and acute normovolemic haemodilution (ANH) with sequestration of unfractionated heparinised autologous blood [9], [10]. Intraoperative autologous blood can be donated prior heparinisation, after heparinisation but before bypass, and after stabilisation during bypass. In this study, we sequestrated a small volume of autologous blood after heparinisation but prior CPB as is our common practice, to mimick blood storage in the context of normovolemic haemodilution. We hypothesized that platelets function would be better preserved in ex vivo sequestrated unfractionated heparinised autologous blood compared to platelet function in the patient, as platelets in the patient are exposed to other activating mechanisms including the CPB circuit. We measured platelet aggregation responses in cardiac surgical patients and in sequestrated unfractionated heparinised autologous blood during the period of CPB with multiple electrode impedance aggregometry (Multiplate®, Dynabyte, Munchen Germany).

Methods

Patients

Twenty-six patients who underwent routine coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) or valve surgery were included for this observational clinical study after approval of the institutional review board of the University Medical Center Groningen and written informed consent. Patients on aspirin were included, clopidogrel was stopped at least 5 days prior to operation. Excluded were patients who were on unfractionated heparin or intravenous tirofiban prior to surgery, patients with a pre-operative platelet count of <150×109/L or an INR>2.0. Anaesthesia was standardised using bispectral index guided total intravenous anaesthesia with propofol, supplemented by sufentanil (3–4 µg/kg). All patients received tranexamic acid (30 mg/kg). Before CPB, 300 U/kg unfractionated bovine heparin was administered, supplemented if necessary to maintain an activated clotting time of at least 400 sec (ACT, Hemochron®, Technidyne, NY, USA). At the end of CPB, unfractionated heparin was reversed with protamine chloride in a 1∶1 ratio. The open CPB circuit included the use of a membrane oxygenator, roller pumps, uncoated tubings, hyperkalemic cardioplegia (St Thomas solution 2, Plegisol®, Hospira, Lake Forest, Ill, US) and was primed with 1.5 L lactated Ringer's solution and 500 mL 10% Hydroxyethyl starch (Haes 10%, Fresenius®, Bad Homburg Germany). No cell saver was used. The haemostatic profile was measured with a viscoelastic measurement (RoTEM thromboelastometry, Pentapharm®, Munich, Germany). Whole blood coagulation was initiated with tissue factor (ExTEM) without citration and recalcification. Fibrinogen (Clauss) and RoTEM measurements were taken after induction of anaesthesia and after unfractionated heparin reversal.

Blood samples from the patients were drawn gently from an unheparinised 20G arterial line, after discarding 4 times the volume of the connection line. Samples were taken after induction of anaesthesia (pre CPB), 5 min after the start of CPB, at the end of CPB, and after unfractionated heparin reversal.

Preparation of autologous blood.

After adequate unfractionated heparinisation as assessed with ACT time >400 sec, just before the start of CPB, a sterile blood conservation bag without additives was filled with 100 ml of autologous blood. This procedure was to mimick blood storage during normovolemic haemodilution, but in actual normovolemic haemodilution much larger volumes of blood are stored. This bag was placed on a stirring device (IKA Laboratory Equipment MK 2) and set at 100 cycles/min at room temperature to prevent stasis and spontaneous agglutination of platelets.

Blood samples from the autologous blood bag were taken 5 min after the start of CPB and at the end of CPB. All blood samples taken for platelet function measurements were stored in plastic tubes with hirudin as recommended by the manufacturer (Multiplate®, Dynabyte Medical, Munchen, Germany).

Platelet Aggregometry.

The Multiplate (Dynabyte® Medical, Munchen, Germany) is a multiple 5 channel whole blood impedance electrode aggregometer with disposable testcells (MEA). The platelet aggregation response was studied with adenosine diphosphate (6.4 µM, ADP), high dose ristocetin (50 uL, 0,77 mg/ml) and thrombin receptor activating peptide (TRAP, 32 µM) a strong activator to assess maximal activation response. ADP and TRAP are direct platelet activators, ristocetin is an indirect activatior which induces von Willebrand factor-mediated platelet activation. The ASPI test with arachidonic acid (0,5 mM), a sensitive platelet aggregation response activator was used to assess aspirin effects on platelet function [11].

Statistical Analysis.

A decrease in platelet receptor response of 25–50% during CPB has been reported [12]–[14]. A difference of 25% between the platelet aggregation response in the autologous blood bag and in the patient was considered clinically relevant and therefore used for sample size calculation (n = 23, power = 0.8, P<0.05), based on data from the study of Toth [15]. Our data had a normal distribution. Student's t-test for independent samples, was used to assess differences between bag and patient. Repeated Measures Analysis of Variance for multiple comparisons were used to assess a trend over time within the patient. A P-value<0.05 was considered significant. Data were not corrected for haemodilution.

Results

Blood samples were obtained from 26 patients, 16 patients took aspirin. The demographic data and intraoperative changes in haemostatic profile are shown in table 1. The ADP and TRAP induced intraoperative aggregation response decreased progressively (pADP = 0.002, pTRAP<0.001, for trend over time, table 2). Already in the sample taken 5 minutes after the start of CPB, a significant decline in both ADP- and TRAP-induced platelet aggregation was observed in comparison to aggregation measured in the sample taken after induction of anesthesia (pADP = 0.004, pTRAP = 0.001). Ristocetin-induced platelet aggregation also declined over time, but the difference in aggregation response between the pre-CPB and 5 minutes after CPB sample was not statistically significant. In samples taken after CPB, ADP- and ristocetin-induced aggregation were lower compared to pre-CPB levels (pADP<0.01, pRISTO = 0.04). In contrast, TRAP-induced aggregation appeared to increase post-CPB, and the post-CPB values were not significantly different from the pre-CPB values (pTRAP = 0.14, table 2).

thumbnail
Download:
Table 1. Demographic data of the 26 patients studied.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0033686.t001

thumbnail
Download:
Table 2. Platelet activation in patients on CPB and in ex vivo stored unfractionated heparin-anticoagulated blood.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0033686.t002

Our study population had reduced platelet aggregation responses in the ASPI test (table 1), which may reflect an existing partial platelet dysfunction in these patients [16]. Nevertheless, preoperative viscoelastic coagulation measurements performed by thromboelastrometry were within normal ranges in all patients.

The measurements of the ADP-, TRAP-, and ristocetin-induced platelet aggregation in the first sample taken from the ex vivo stored autologous blood were not different from the samples taken prior to CPB from the patients (table 2). At the end of the CPB period, the ADP induced platelet aggregation in the ex-vivo stored blood was decreased compared to the first sample taken from the blood bag (pADP = 0.02, table 2). Decreases in TRAP- and (to a lesser extend) ristocetin-induced platelet aggregation were also observed, but these differences were not statistically significant (pTRAP = 0.08, pRISTO = 0.52). At the end of CPB there was no difference in the platelet aggregation response with all activators between the samples from the ex-vivo stored autologous blood and samples taken from the patient (table 2).

Discussion

In this observational study we found no difference in the platelet aggregation induced by ADP, TRAP, or ristocetin between samples taken from cardiac surgical patients at the end of CPB and ex-vivo stored heparinised autologous blood. In addition, we found a progressive decrease of ADP- and TRAP-induced platelet aggregation response during CPB, which was already apparent at 5 minutes after the start of CPB. This rapid decrease in platelet aggregation response likely reflects the initiation of CPB, as these findings were not obtained in the sequestrated heparinized blood bag.

Several explanations have been offered for the decrease in platelet function during CPB [3], [4]. The decrease in platelet function in relation to CPB has been demonstrated in many studies in cardiac surgical patients [1], [13], [14], [17]–[20]. These studies are difficult to compare as several methods have been used for the measurement of platelet function, several preservatives were used for storage and sampling and either whole blood or platelet rich plasma was used. Rahe-Meyer [21] also used the Multiplate® to study platelet aggregation during CPB and also found a significant decrease in TRAP- and ADP-induced platelet aggregation, but in this study platelet aggregation was assessed in samples taken 30 min after initiation of CPB. Laga [20] suggested that haemodilution is a major confounder in the measured changes in platelet function during CPB. Recently, an in vitro study in healthy volunteers demonstrated that platelet counts below the normal range due to haemodilution may affect the Multiplate measurements, although even severely diluted samples may give results within the normal range [22]. In our study population, we observed a decrease in platelet count during CPB with a mean platelet count below the normal range. Therefore an effect of haemodilution cannot be excluded. Nevertheless, the decline in platelet function in the patient with decreasing platelet count was not different from the platelet function decline in the ex-vivo stored blood, in which the platelet count was preserved. In our study we did not perform actual isovolemic haemodilution with a clinically relevant volume substitution. Further haemodilution may have obscured the differences caused by unfractionated heparinisation and the artificial surfaces of the storage bag and the cardiopulmonary bypass equipment. Our study was simply designed to mimick the effects of blood storage in the context of normovolemic haemodilution. Another limitation of our study is that the results only pertain to practices where blood is donated prior to haemodilution and bypass. If bypass is started first, blood in the storage bag will be haemodiluted and exposed to the initial damaging effects of CPB. Our study suggests that these effects may not be neglectible. Flom-Halvorsen et al. also assessed the quality of intraoperative autologous blood donation preserved in unfractionated heparin. They found a small increase in beta-thromboglobulin after storage and suggested that heparinised autologous blood was an ideal blood product to restore hemostatic effects [23]. They however did not compare platelet function of the stored blood with platelet function in samples taken from the patients. As we did not measure beta-thromboglobulin we cannot relate our results to their findings. The other preservative widely used for intraoperative autologous blood storage is a citrate containing solution. Citrate, however, functions as an anticoagulant by chelating Ca2+ ions. As extracellular calcium is pivotal in platelet activation, this anticoagulant is not advocated for platelet function studies using the Multiplate® [24].

Although it appeared plausible that ex-vivo storage of whole blood in unfractionated heparin would better preserve platelet function as compared to platelet function in the patient, we found no differences in platelet function decline between the two situations. Unfractionated heparin affects platelet function by paradoxical platelet activating properties, which lead to a net decline in platelet activatability [5], [25]–[26]. This decline in platelet functionality is likely caused by irreversible platelet activation by heparin, which may occur in combination with other effects such as platelet activation by the storage bag (see below). When platelets are irreversibly activated, i.e., activated in such a way that granule contents are secreted, they can no longer be activated by a second stimulus, a phenomenon which is well known in literature [27]. Possibly the effects of unfractionated heparin on platelet function as measured by Multiplate® are far more important than the effects of CPB and the surgical procedure on platelet function. Platelet function decline ex vivo may be a combination of the unfractionated heparin effect with effects of the surface of the blood bag (comparable to the surface of CPB tubings) and the temporary storage at room temperature, which may also contribute to platelet activation [28].

In conclusion, we have demonstrated that platelet function is not better preserved in ex-vivo stored autologous blood anticoagulated with unfractionated heparin as compared to platelet function in the patient itself during the same period of cardiopulmonary bypass. Sequestration of autologous blood in unfractionated heparin, as used for acute normovolemic haemodilution in cardiac surgery patients does not seem to be profitable to preserve platelet function.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: RGH VC. Performed the experiments: RGH VC TL. Analyzed the data: RGH VC AV. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: RGH VC TL. Wrote the paper: RGH VC AV TL.

References

  1. 1. Harker LA, Malpass TW, Branson HE, Hessel EA II, Slichter SJ (1980) Mechanism of abnormal bleeding in patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass: Acquired transient platelet dysfunction associated with selective alpha-granule release. Blood 56: 824–834.
  2. 2. Solomon C, Hartmann J, Osthaus A, Schochl H, Raymondos K, et al. (2010) Platelet concentrates transfusion in cardiac surgery in relation to preoperative point-of-care assessment of platelet adhesion and aggregation. Platelets 21: 221–228.
  3. 3. Weerasinghe A, Taylor KM, The Platelet in Cardiopulmonary Bypass (1998) Ann Thorac Surg 66: 2145–2152.
  4. 4. Hartmann M, Sucker C, Boehm O, Koch A, Loer S, et al. (2006) Effects of Cardiac Surgery on Haemostasis Transfusion Medicine Reviews 20: 230–241.
  5. 5. Gao C, Boylan B, Fang J, Wilcox DA, Newman DK, et al. (2011) Heparin promotes platelet responsiveness by potentiating αIIbβ3-mediated outside-in signaling. Blood 117: 4946–4952.
  6. 6. Hiramatsu Y, Gikakis N, Anderson HL III, Gorman JH III, Marcinkiewicz C, et al. (1997) Tirofiban provides platelet anesthesia during cardiopulmonary bypass in baboons. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 113: 182–193.
  7. 7. Straub A, Azevedo R, Beierlein W, Wendel HP, Dietz K, et al. (2006) Tirofiban (Aggrastat®) Protects Platelets and Decreases Platelet-Granulocyte Binding in an Extracorporeal Circulation Model. Thorac Cardiov Surg 54: 162–167.
  8. 8. Christenson JT, Reuse J, Badel P, Simonet F, Schmuziger M (1996) Plateletpheresis Before Redo CABG Diminishes Excessive Blood Transfusion. Ann Thorac Surg 62: 1373–1379.
  9. 9. Ferraris VA, Brown JR, Despotis GJ, Hammon JW, Reece TB, et al. (2011) 2011 Update to The Society of Thoracic Surgeons and the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists Blood Conservation Clinical Practice Guidelines. Ann Thorac Surg 91: 944–982.
  10. 10. Ramnarine IR, Higgins MJ, McGarrity A, Mahmood Z, Wheatley DJ, et al. (2006) Autologous Blood Transfusion for Cardiopulmonary Bypass: Effects of Storage Conditions on Platelet function. Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia 20: 541–547.
  11. 11. Weber CF, Jambor C, Strasser C, Moritz A, Papadopoulos N, et al. (2011) Normovolemic modified ultrafiltration is associated with better preserved platelet function and less postoperative blood loss in patients undergoing complex cardiac surgery: A randomized and controlled study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 141: 1298–12304.
  12. 12. van Oeveren W, Harder MP, Roozendaal KJ, Eijsman L, Wildevuur CR (1990) Aprotinin protects platelets against the initial effect of cardiopulmonary bypass. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 99: 788–796.
  13. 13. Kondo C, Tanaka K, Takagi K, Shimono T, Shinpo H, et al. (1993) Platelet dysfunction during cardiopumonary bypass. ASAIO journal M550–553.
  14. 14. Greilich PE, Carr ME, Carr SL, Chang AS (1995) Reductions in platelet force development by cardiopulmonary bypass are associated with haemorrhage. Anesth Analg 80: 459–465.
  15. 15. Toth O, Calatzis A, Penz S, Losonczy H, Siess W (2006) Multiple electrode aggregometry: a new device to measure platelet aggregation in whole blood. Thromb Haemostasis 96: 781–788.
  16. 16. Rahe-Meyer N, Winterhalter M, Hartmann J, Pattison A, Hecker H, et al. (2008) An Evaluation of Cyclooxygenase-1 Inhibition Before Coronary Artery Surgery: Aggregometry Versus Patient Self-Reporting. Anesth Analg 107: 1791–1797.
  17. 17. Irani MS, Izzat NN, Jones JW (1995) Platelet function, coagulation tests, and cardioplmonary bypass: lack of correlation between per-operative and intra-operative whole blood lumiaggregometry and perioperative blood loss in patients receiving autologous platelet rich plasma. Blood Coag Fibrinolys 6: 428–432.
  18. 18. Ballotta A, Saleh HZ, El Baghdady HW, Gomaa M, Belloli F, et al. (2007) Comparison of early platelet activation in patients undergoing on-pump versus off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 134: 132–138.
  19. 19. Dietrich GV, Schueck R, Menges T, Kiesenbauer NP, Fruehauf A-C, et al. (1998) Comparison of Four Methods for the Determination of Platelet Function in Whole Blood in Cardiac Surgery. Thrombosis Research 89: 295–301.
  20. 20. Laga S, Bollen H, Arnout J, Hoylaerts M, Meyns B (2005) Heparin influences human platelet behavior in cardiac surgery with or without cardiopulmonary bypass. Artificial Organs 29: 541–546.
  21. 21. Rahe-Meyer N, Solomon C, Tokuno M-L, Winterhalter M, Shrestha M, et al. (2009) Comparative Assessment of Coagulation Changes Induced by Two Different Types of Heart–Lung Machine. Artificial Organs 34: 3–12.
  22. 22. Hanke AA, Roberg K, Monaca E, Sellmann T, Weber CF, et al. (2010) Impact of platelet count on results obtained from multiple electrode platelet aggregometry (Multiplate). Eur J Med Res 15: 214–9.
  23. 23. Flom-Halvorsen HI, Øvrum E, Øystese R, Brosstad F (2003) Quality of Intraoperative Autologous Blood Withdrawal Used for Retransfusion After Cardiopulmonary Bypass. Ann Thorac Surg 76: 744–748.
  24. 24. Kalb ML, Lukasz P, Scharbert G, Kozek-Langenecker SA (2009) The effect of ex vivo anticoagulants on whole blood platelet aggregation. Platelets 20(1): 7–11.
  25. 25. Muriiti EW, Belcher PR (2006) Heparin, cardiopulmonary bypass and platelet dysfunction. Artificial Organs 30: 488–489.
  26. 26. Xiao Z, Theroux P (1998) Platelet activation with unfractionated Heparin at therapeutic concentrations and comparisons with a direct thrombin inhibitor. Circulation 97: 251–256.
  27. 27. Kamath S, Blann AD, Lip GY (2001) Platelet activation: assessment and quantification. Eur Heart J 22(17): 1561–1571.
  28. 28. Maurer-Spurej E, Pfeiler G, Maurer N, Lindner H, Glatter O, et al. (2001) Room temperature activates human blood platelets. Lab Invest 81(4): 581–92.