Figures
Abstract
Background
A functional -94 insertion/deletion polymorphism (rs28362491) in the promoter of the NFKB1 gene was reported to influence NFKB1 expression and confer susceptibility to different types of cancer. This study aims to determine whether the polymorphism is associated with risk of bladder cancer.
Materials and methods
TaqMan assay was used to determine genotype among 609 cases and 640 controls in a Chinese population. Logistic regression was used to assess the association between the polymorphism and bladder cancer risk, and quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction was used to determine NFKB1 mRNA expression.
Results
Compared with the ins/ins/ins/del genotypes, the del/del genotype was associated with a significantly increased risk of bladder cancer [adjusted odd ratio (OR) = 1.92, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.42–2.59]. The increased risk was more prominent among subjects over 65 years old (OR = 2.37, 95% CI = 1.52–3.70), male subjects (OR = 1.97, 95% CI = 1.40–2.79) and subjects with self-reported family history of cancer (OR = 3.59, 95% CI = 1.19–10.9). Furthermore, the polymorphism was associated with a higher risk of developing non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (OR = 2.07, 95% CI = 1.51–2.85), grade 1 bladder cancer (OR = 2.40, 95% CI = 1.68–3.43), single tumor bladder cancer (OR = 2.04, 95% CI = 1.48–2.82) and smaller tumor size bladder cancer (OR = 2.10, 95% CI = 1.51–2.92). The expression of NFKB1 mRNA in bladder cancer tissues with homozygous insertion genotype was higher than that with deletion allele.
Citation: Li P, Gu J, Yang X, Cai H, Tao J, Yang X, et al. (2013) Functional Promoter -94 ins/del ATTG Polymorphism in NFKB1 Gene Is Associated with Bladder Cancer Risk in a Chinese Population. PLoS ONE 8(8): e71604. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0071604
Editor: Antonia Vlahou, Biomedical Research Foundation, Academy of Athens, Greece
Received: April 1, 2013; Accepted: July 8, 2013; Published: August 20, 2013
Copyright: © 2013 Li et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Funding: This work was supported by the Program for Development of Innovative Research Team of the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, the Provincial Initiative Program for Excellency Disciplines of Jiangsu Province, the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grants No. 81272832 and 81201997), the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (grant No. BK2011848) and the Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Introduction
Bladder cancer, primarily urothelial cell carcinoma (UCC), is the second most common genitourinary malignancy that leads to significant morbidity and mortality [1]. UCC is a heterogeneous disease, with 70% of patients presenting non-muscle invasive tumors and 30% presenting muscle-invasive disease associated with a poor prognosis from distant metastases [2]–[4]. These tumors have a lifelong risk of recurrence but are generally not life threatening. Risk factors for bladder tumorigenesis can be classified into three subsets: genetic and molecular abnormalities, chemical or environmental exposures, and chronic irritation [5], [6]. Although many people are exposed to the above-mentioned risk factors, only a fraction of exposed individuals develops UCC. Thus, individual variations in the susceptibility to risk factors leading to bladder carcinogenesis may exist.
Nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB) was first identified in 1986 as a B-cell factor that binds to a site in the enhancer region of the gene encoding the immunoglobulin κ light chain [7]. Since then, NF-κB has been shown to regulate the transcription of many genes for immune response, cell adhesion, differentiation, proliferation, angiogenesis, cellular stress reactions, tumorigenesis, and cell survival and apoptosis [4]. Several investigators have reported the constitutive activation of NF-κB in various tumor cells and cell lines, such as breast cancer [8], colorectal cancer [9], [10], lung cancer [11], [12], and pancreatic cancer [13]. The activation of NF-κB was reported to be potentially associated with bladder cancer growth by protecting the cancer cells from apoptotic cell death [14]. NF-κB is a heterodimer of the Rel family with five members, namely, RelA, RelB, c-Rel, p50 (NF-κB1), and p52 (NF-κB2); it is also the point of convergence of some metabolic and oncogenic pathways [15].
The NFKB1 gene, which is located at human chromosome 4q24, encodes protein p50 that could act as a transcription factor to regulate its target gene transcription [16], [17]. The -94 ins/del ATTG polymorphism (rs28362491) in NFKB1 promoter reportedly elicits a regulatory effect on the NFKB1 gene and plays a role in the susceptibility of individuals to various malignancies, including gastric cancer [18], ovarian cancer [19], prostate cancer [20], and oral squamous cell carcinoma [21]. Riemann et al. [22] reported that NFKB1 (p50) mRNA expression is higher in tumor tissues with the ins/ins genotype than in those with the ins/del + del/del genotype. They also found that patients with homozygous deletion possess a statistically higher risk of tumor recurrence than carriers with one or more insertion alleles in non-muscle invasive bladder cancer. However, in their study, no association was found between the -94 ins/del ATTG polymorphism in NFKB1 promoter and bladder cancer risk [22].
In the present study, we hypothesized that the -94 ins/del ATTG polymorphism in NFKB1 promoter is associated with bladder cancer risk. This hypothesis was tested in our ongoing, hospital-based, case-control study in a Chinese population.
Materials and Methods
Ethics Statement
The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants involved in this study.
Patients and controls
The participants of this study included 609 bladder cancer patients and 640 age-matched controls. All subjects were from the Han population living in Jiangsu province and Anhui province of Eastern China. Bladder cancer patients were recruited from July 2006 to July 2012 at the Department of Urology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University. Patients with histories of cancer, metastasized cancer from other or unknown origins, and previous radiotherapy or chemotherapy were excluded. The diagnosis of bladder cancer was confirmed by histopathologic analysis. Cancer-free control individuals were frequency matched for age (±5 years) and sex, and were genetically unrelated to the cases. All controls were recruited from healthy subjects who were seeking physical examination in the outpatient department of the same hospital. Controls were excluded if they had symptoms suggestive of bladder cancer, such as hematuria. Prior to recruitment, all subjects were interviewed in person to collect demographic data and clinical characteristics, including age, gender, race, tobacco smoking, alcohol drinking, and self-reported family history of cancer. According to tumor-node-metastasis classification for the stage (2002 International Union Against Cancer), the clinical stage at the time of diagnosis was classified into two subgroups: non-muscle invasive group (pTa-pT1) and muscle invasive group (pT2-pT4). According to histopathologic grade (WHO 1973, grading of urothelial papilloma), the patients were classified into three subgroups: grades 1, 2, and 3. Individuals who smoked daily for >1 year were defined as ever smokers, and the rest were considered as never smokers. Individuals who drank at least three times per week for more than 6 months were defined as ever drinkers, and the rest were considered as never drinkers.
DNA extraction and polymorphism genotyping
Genomic DNA of each individual was extracted from 150 μl EDTA-anticoagulated peripheral blood samples using a DNA extraction kit (Tiangen Biotech, Beijing, China) following the manufacturer's instructions. The -94 ins/delATTG polymorphism in NFKB1 promoter was genotyped using TaqMan single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) Genotyping Assays (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA), and SDS 2.4 software was used for allelic discrimination. The primers, probes, and reaction conditions for each SNP are available upon request. Amplification was performed under the following conditions: 50°C for 2 min; 95°C for 10 min; and 45 cycles of 95°C for 15 s and 60°C for 1 min. For quality control, four negative controls were included in each plate, and 5% of the samples were randomly selected for repeated genotyping. The results were 100% concordant.
Quantitative real-time PCR
RNA from 35 frozen bladder cancer tissues (n = 8 for ins/ins genotype and n = 27 for carriers of del allele) was extracted using standard methods (RNeasy kit, Qiagen). A sample of 1 μg total RNA was used for cDNA synthesis with oligo-dT primers (Invitrogen, Karlsrule, Germany) and superscript II reverse transcriptase (Takara Bio, Shiga, Japan). PCR was performed using PCR Master (Roche, Mannheim, Germany) with the following primers of NFKB1: 5′-GTGAAGGCCCATCCCATGGT-3′ (forward) and 5′-TGTGACCAACTGAACAATAACC-3′ (reverse) and the primers for β-actin were 5′-ACTGGAACGGTGAAGGTGAC-3′ (forward) and 5′-AGAGAAGTGGGGTGGCTTTT-3′ (reverse). PCR in duplicates was done on a 384-well ABI 7900HT Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). The relative expression of NFKB1 in relation to β-actin was calculated using the formula NFKB1/β-actin = 2−ΔCt.
Statistical analysis
The frequency distributions of the selected demographic variables and each allele and genotype of the -94 ins/del ATTG polymorphism in NFKB1 promoter between the cases and controls were evaluated using χ2-type distribution. Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) was tested using a goodness-of-fit χ2 test. Unconditional univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted to calculate the crude and adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for bladder cancer risk. Interaction was tested using a multiplicative interaction term included in the multivariate model. To explore potential interactions between the polymorphism and tobacco smoking, we assessed a multiplicative gene – environment interaction by logistic regression analysis, including the main effect variables and their product terms. All analyses were carried out using SPSS 13.0 statistical software. A two-side P value of less than 0.05 was considered to indicate statistical significance.
Results
Characteristics of the study population
The frequency distributions of the selected characteristics of the cases and controls are shown in Table 1. The cases and controls was showed to be adequately matched on age and sex (P = 0.180 for age and P = 0.606 for sex). More ever smokers were found among the cases than the controls (47.9% vs. 38.0%; P<0.001). No significant difference in drinking status was found between the cases and controls (P = 0.169). In addition, the frequency of relatives with cancer was higher in the cases than in the controls (27.8% vs. 6.6%; P<0.001). These variables were further adjusted in the multivariate logistic regression analysis to assess the main effect of the -94 ins/del ATTG polymorphism in NFKB1 promoter on bladder cancer risk. The clinicopathological characteristics of 609 bladder cancer cases was listed in Table 1.
Association between the -94 ins/del ATTG polymorphism in NFKB1 promoter and bladder cancer risk
The genotype and allele frequency distributions of the -94 ins/del ATTG polymorphism in NFKB1 promoter among the cases and controls, as well as their associations with bladder cancer risk, are presented in Table 2. The genotype frequencies in the controls conformed to HWE (P = 0.164). The frequencies of the ins/ins, ins/del, and del/del genotypes were 31.0%, 44.2%, and 24.8% among the cases, respectively, and 34.8%, 50.6%, and 14.5% among the controls, respectively (P<0.001). Using the ins/ins and ins/del genotypes as reference, we found that the del/del genotype was associated with a statistically significant increased risk of bladder cancer (P<0.001, OR = 1.92, 95% CI = 1.40–2.59). A similar result was observed in the del/del genotype compared with the ins/ins genotype (P<0.001, OR = 2.10, 95% CI = 1.48–2.97).
Stratified analysis of the -94 ins/del ATTG polymorphism in NFKB1 promoter and bladder cancer risk
We further assessed the effect the -94 ins/del ATTG polymorphism in NFKB1 promoter on bladder cancer risk stratified by age, sex, smoking status, drinking status, and self-reported family history of cancer. As shown in Table 3, the increased risk was more pronounced among older subjects (P<0.001, OR = 2.37, 95% CI = 1.52–3.70), male subjects (P<0.001, OR = 1.97, 95% CI = 1.40–2.79) and subjects with self-reported family history of cancer (P = 0.024, OR = 3.59, 95% CI = 1.19–10.9) (Table 3).
Association between the -94 ins/del ATTG polymorphism in NFKB1 promoter and clinicopathological characteristics of bladder cancer patients
When compared with control group (Table 4), the risk of bladder cancer significantly increased in the del/del genotype compared with the ins/del + ins/ins genotype in non-muscle invasive cases (P<0.001, OR = 2.07, 95% CI = 1.51–2.85), grade 1 bladder cancer cases (P<0.001, OR = 2.40, 95% CI = 1.68–3.43), single tumor cases (P<0.001, OR = 2.04, 95% CI = 1.48–2.82) and cases with smaller tumor size (P<0.001, OR = 2.10, 95% CI = 1.51–2.92). No significant association was observed in the stratification of tumor grade and stage of bladder cancer cases. (Table 5).
Interaction between the -94 ins/del ATTG polymorphism in NFKB1 promoter and tobacco smoking
Compared with non-smokers with the ins/ins and ins/del genotypes, smokers with the del/del genotype had significantly increased risk of bladder cancer (P<0.001, OR = 2.53, 95% CI = 1.55–4.11) (Table 6). Given that the del/del genotype is associated with an increased risk in smokers, we evaluated whether smoking status is associated with the -94 ins/del ATTG polymorphism in NFKB1 promoter. We did not observe a multiplicative interaction effect between the polymorphism and smoking status (P = 0.783) (Table 6).
Association between the -94 ins/del ATTG polymorphism in NFKB1 promoter and NFKB1 mRNA expression
The amount of relative NFKB1 mRNA in bladder cancer tissues obtained from the homozygous insertion genotype (n = 8) was higher than that in tissues from the ins/del + del/del genotype (n = 27) (P = 0.025), even though there was significant overlap between the two groups (Figure 1).
Discussion
In this study, we identified an association between the -94 ins/del ATTG polymorphism in NFKB1 promoter and bladder cancer risk in a Chinese population. We observed that individuals with the del/del genotype have 1.92 times greater risk for bladder cancer than those with the ins/ins and ins/del genotypes (P<0.001). Furthermore, individuals homozygous for del have higher bladder cancer risk than those homozygous for ins (OR = 2.10, P<0.001). Besides, individuals with the del/del genotype was also associated with an increased risk of developing non-muscle invasive, grade 1, single tumor and smaller tumor size bladder cancer.
As a subunit of the NF-κB complex, p50 is encoded by the NFKB1 gene [16]. The over-expression of p50 (NF-κB1) was observed in various malignancies [22], [23], including non-small cell lung carcinoma, colon cancer, prostate cancer, breast cancer, bone cancer, and brain cancer. Considering that p50 over-expression is frequently observed in various tumor tissues, p50 is potentially involved in tumorigenesis.
Genetic variation plays a critical role in determining cancer risk, and several studies have investigated the association between the -94 ins/del ATTG polymorphism in NFKB1 promoter and cancer risk [18]–[21]. To date, only two studies have attempted to evaluate the association between this polymorphism and bladder cancer risk [24], [25]. Riemann et al. [24] reported that the polymorphism is not associated with an increased susceptibility to transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder in Caucasians. In our study, the del/del genotype was found to be associated with increased risk of bladder transitional cell carcinoma, including the non-muscle invasive and muscle invasive types. The disparity of results could be attributed to the different ethnicity of the study population. Tang et al. [25] studied a southwest Chinese population of 207 cases and reported that individuals with the ins/ins genotype have increased risk of non-muscle invasive transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder. Although the research population of Tang et al. [25] and present study were both Chinese Han population, the geographical distribution between our study population and theirs was different, which could result in divergent genetic backgrounds. Therefore, it might be a probable explaination for the contradictory results between our study and theirs. Moreover, the sample size in our study was moderately larger than two aforementioned bladder cancer studies, which might also partly explain the discrepancy.
The probable mechanism behind the observed association may be linked to the expression and activity of p50 (NF-κB1), which regulates important cellular events such as apoptosis and cell death independent of the NF-κB complex [17]. Using a reporter assay, a previous study found that the –94 ins/del ATTG polymorphism has regulatory influence on NFKB1 gene expression and that the activity of the ins allele is twice as high as that of the del allele [26]. Riemann et al. [24] reported that p50 (NFKB1) expression in bladder cancer tissues is higher in individuals with the ins/ins genotype than in those carrying the del allele. In the current study, we also identified a positive association between the ins/ins genotype and increased p50 (NFKB1) expression in bladder cancer tissues. The difference in the expression of p50 (NFKB1) in bladder cancer tissues between the ins/ins genotype and carriers of del allele may indicate the regulatory effect of the -94 ins/del ATTG polymorphism in NFKB1 promoter on p50 (NFKB1) expression. Previous works revealed that p50 induces MEKK4 activation by proteasome-dependent GADD45α degradation [27], [28]. Furthermore, the activation of MEKK4 specifically activates the JNK signaling pathway, which is involved in environmental stress-induced cell apoptosis [29], [30]. Therefore, the provocative explanation for the observed association between the -94 ins/del ATTG polymorphism and bladder cancer risk is that the del/del genotype induces the development of bladder cancer by down-regulating the expression of p50 (NFKB1), which plays a role in inducing cell apoptosis through the aforementioned mechanism.
Homodimers of p50 (NF-κB1) can repress the transcription of genes regulated by NF-κB [31]. The increased formation of the p50-p50 complex arising in part from enhanced p50 (NFKB1) expression [32], [33] suggests a reduced ability to promote TNF-α expression in cells [34]–[36]. The expression levels of many genes regulated by NF-κB, such as TNF-α, were also proposed to be higher in NFKB1 (p50) knockout mice [37], [38]. The cytokine TNF-α promotes tumor proliferation by inducing the release of matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) [39]–[43], particularly the gelatinases MMP-2 and MMP-9, which promote tumor growth and metastasis [44], [45]. Thus, we speculate that the ins/ins genotype can reduce the transcription of genes regulated by NF-κB, such as TNF-α, by enhancing p50 expression. Conversely, the del/del genotype can promote the proliferation of bladder cancer through the transcriptional activation of TNF-α caused by the inhibitory effect of the del/del genotype on the formation of p50 homodimers [44], [45].
Subgroup analysis according to clinicopathological characteristics, including stage, grade, tumor number, and tumor size, might help in identifying prognostic factors involved in various bladder cancer progression pathways [46]. Riemann et al. [24] reported that the time-to-recurrence is significantly shorter in patients with the del/del genotype than in those carrying the ins allele. A large majority (70%) of bladder cancer was considered to be of the non-muscle invasive type, which tends to recur and seldom progresses [2]. In this study, the del/del genotype was also related to an increased risk of developing non-muscle invasive or grade 1 bladder cancer (Table 4). This finding is in accordance with the study of Riemann et al. [24]. However, further follow-up studies with larger sample sizes are needed to validate these results. Furthermore, the del/del genotype was associated with a more pronounced risk of bladder cancer in the elder subject and subject with self-reported family history of cancer compared with the ins/ins + ins/del genotype (Table 3). Age is now widely accepted as the greatest single risk factor in developing bladder cancer [47], [48]. Several theories have been proposed to explain the relationship between carcinogenesis and ageing [49]. As individuals continue to age, they experience cumulative environmental exposure to carcinogens, as well as the accumulation of cellular events, such as genomic instability. The patients with self-reported family history of cancer was also believed to suffer from an increased risk of bladder cancer [50]. This fact explains the stronger association between the del/del genotype and bladder tumorigenesis in the elder subgroup and subgroup with self-reported family history of cancer. In the present study, the risk was found to be more significant in males. Male patients were considered to be more exposed to tobacco smoking and other risk factors implicated in the etiology of bladder cancer, which may explain why men are more susceptible to bladder cancer.
Several potential limitations of the present study should be considered. First, our study was a hospital-based case-control study. Thus, we cannot exclude the chance of selection bias to subjects that may have been associated with a particular genotype. Second, the sample size (609 cases and 640 controls) in this study may not be large enough to detect small effects from very low-penetrance SNPs and evaluate gene – environment interaction adequately. However, under the current sample size, we have 99.5% power to detect an OR of ≥1.92 with an exposure frequency of 39.8% at the 0.05 significance level.
In conclusion, we identified an association between the -94 insertion/deletion ATTG polymorphism in NFKB1 promoter and bladder cancer risk in a Chinese population. The del/del genotype was found to be associated with an increased risk of bladder cancer.
Author Contributions
Conceived and designed the experiments: CY MG QL. Performed the experiments: PL JG XY JXY. Analyzed the data: XY PL JG ZW. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: PL JG XY HC JT. Wrote the paper: XY PL JG. Critical review of manuscript: QL MG CY.
References
- 1. Jemal A, Bray F (2011) Center MM, Ferlay J, Ward E, et al (2011) Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 61: 69–90.
- 2. Kaufman DS, Shipley WU, Feldman AS (2009) Bladder cancer. Lancet 374: 239–49.
- 3. Catto JW, Yates DR, Rehman I, Azzouzi AR, Patterson J, et al. (2007) Behavior of urothelial carcinoma with respect to anatomical location. J Urol 177: 1715–1720.
- 4. Stein JP, Lieskovsky G, Cote R, Groshen S, Feng AC, et al. (2001) Radical cystectomy in the treatment of invasive bladder cancer: long-term results in 1,054 patients. J Clin Oncol 19: 666–675.
- 5. Kiriluk KJ, Prasad SM, Patel AR, Steinberg GD, Smith ND (2012) Bladder cancer risk from occupational and environmental exposures. Urol Oncol 30: 199–211.
- 6. Dudziec E, Goepel JR, Catto JW (2011) Global epigenetic profiling in bladder cancer. Epigenomics 3: 35–45.
- 7. Sen R, Baltimore D (1986) Inducibility of kappa immunoglobulin enhancer-binding protein NF-kappa B by a posttranslational mechanism. Cell 47: 921–928.
- 8. Bhat-Nakshatri P, Sweeney CJ, Nakshatri H (2002) Identification of signal transduction pathways involved in constitutive NF-κB activation in breast cancer cells. Oncogene 21: 2066–78.
- 9. Pikarsky E, Porat RM, Stein I, Abramovitch R, Amit S, et al. (2004) NF-kappaB functions as a tumour promoter in inflammation-associated cancer. Nature 431: 461–466.
- 10. Danese S, Mantovani A (2010) Inflammatory bowel disease and intestinal cancer: A paradigm of the Yin-Yang interplay between inflammation and cancer. Oncogene 29: 3313–3323.
- 11. Karin M, Cao Y, Greten FR, Li ZW (2002) NF-kappaB in cancer: from innocent bystander to major culprit. Nat Rev Cancer 2: 301–310.
- 12. Saitoh Y, Martínez Bruyn VJ, Uota S, Hasegawa A, Yamamoto N, et al. (2010) Overexpression of NF-κB inducing kinase underlies constitutive NF-κB activation in lung cancer cells. Lung Cancer 70: 263–70.
- 13. Wang W, Abbruzzese JL, Evans DB, Larry L, Cleary KR, et al. (1999) The nuclear factor-κB/RelA transcription factor is constitutively activated in human pancreatic adenocarcinoma cells. Clin Cancer Res 5: 119–27.
- 14. Sumitomo M, Tachibana M, Ozu C, Asakura H, Murai M, et al. (1999) Induction of apoptosis of cytokine-producing bladder cancer cells by adenovirus-mediated IkappaBalpha overexpression. Hum Gene Ther. 10: 37–47.
- 15. Bours V, Dejardin E, Goujon-Letawe F, Merville MP, Castronovo V (1994) The NF-κB transcription factor and cancer: high expression of NF-κB and IκB-related proteins in tumour cell lines. Biochem Pharmacol 47: 145–149.
- 16. Chen F, Castranova V, Shi X, Demers LM (1999) New insights into the role of nuclear factor-kappaB, a ubiquitous transcription factor in the initiation of diseases. Clin Chem 45: 7–17.
- 17. Yu Y, Wan Y, Huang C (2009) The biological functions of NF-kappaB1 (p50) and its potential as an anti-cancer target. Curr Cancer Drug Targets 9: 566–71.
- 18. Lo SS, Chen JH, Wu CW, Lui WY (2009) Functional polymorphism of NF-ΚB1 promoter may correlate to the susceptibility of gastric cancer in aged patients. Surgery 145: 280–5.
- 19. Fan Y, Yu W, Ye P, Wang H, Wang Z, et al. (2011) NF-ΚB1 Insertion/Deletion Promoter Polymorphism Increases the Risk of Advanced Ovarian Cancer in a Chinese Population. DNA Cell Biol 30: 241–5.
- 20. Zhang P, Wei Q, Li X, Wang K, Zeng H, et al. (2009) A functional insertion/deletion polymorphism in the promoter region of the NF-ΚB1 gene increases susceptibility for prostate cancer. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 191: 73–7.
- 21. Lin SC, Liu CJ, Yeh WI, Lui MT, Chang KW, et al. (2006) Functional polymorphism in NF-ΚB1 promoter is related to the risks of oral squamous cell carcinoma occurring on older male areca (betel) chewers. Cancer Lett 243: 47–54.
- 22. Mukhopadhyay T, Roth JA, Maxwell SA (1995) Altered expression of the p50 subunit of the NF-kappa B transcription factor complex in non-small cell lung carcinoma. Oncogene 11: 999–1003.
- 23. Bours V, Dejardin E, Goujon-Letawe F, Merville MP, Castronovo V (1994) The NF-kappa B transcription factor and cancer: high expression of NF-kappa B- and I kappa B-related proteins in tumor cell lines. Biochem Pharmacol 47: 145–9.
- 24. Riemann K, Becker L, Struwe H, Rübben H, Eisenhardt A, et al. (2007) Insertion/deletion polymorphism in the promoter of NFB1 as a potential molecular marker for the risk of recurrence in superficial bladder cancer. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther 45: 423–30.
- 25. Tang T, Cui S, Deng X, Gong Z, Jiang G, et al. (2010) Insertion/Deletion Polymorphism in the Promoter Region of NF-ΚB1 Gene Increases Susceptibility for Superficial Bladder Cancer in Chinese. DNA Cell Biol 29: 9–12.
- 26. Karban AS, Okazaki T, Panhuysen CI, Gallegos T, Potter JJ, et al. (2004) Functional annotation of a novel NFKB1 promoter polymorphism that increases risk for ulcerative colitis. Hum Mol Genet 13: 35–45.
- 27. Song L, Li J, Zhang D, Liu ZG, Ye J, et al. (2006) IKKbeta programs to turn on the GADD45alpha-MKK4-JNK apoptotic cascade specifically via p50 NF-kappaB in arsenite response. J Cell Biol 175: 607–17.
- 28. Kovalsky O, Lung FD, Roller PP, Fornace AJ Jr (2001) Oligomerization of human Gadd45α protein. J Biol Chem 276: 39330–9.
- 29. Gerwins P, Blank JL, Johnson GL (1997) Cloning of a novel mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase kinase, MEKK4, that selectively regulates the c-Jun amino terminal kinase pathway. J Biol Chem 272: 8288–95.
- 30. Tournier C, Hess P, Yang DD, Xu J, Turner TK, et al. (2000) Requirement of JNK for stress-induced activation of the cytochrome c-mediated death pathway. Science 288: 870–4.
- 31. Tong X, Yin L, Washington R, Rosenberg DW, Giardina C (2004) The p50-p50 NF-kappaB complex as a stimulus-specific repressor of gene activation. Mol Cell Biochem 265: 171–83.
- 32. Inan MS, Rasoulpour RJ, Yin L, Hubbard AK, Rosenberg DW, et al. (2000) The luminal short-chain fatty acid butyrate modulates NF-kappa B activity in a human colonic epithelial cell line. Gastroenterology 118: 724–734.
- 33. Place RF, Haspeslagh D, Giardina C (2003) Induced stabilization of Ikappa-Balpha can facilitate its re-synthesis and prevent sequential degradation. J Cell Physiol 195: 470–478.
- 34. Ziegler-Heitbrock L (2001) The p50-homodimer mechanism in tolerance to LPS. J Endotoxin Res 7: 219–222.
- 35. Ziegler-Heitbrock HW, Frankenberger M, Wedel A (1995) Tolerance to lipopolysaccharide in human blood monocytes. Immunobiology 193: 217–223.
- 36. Adib-Conquy M, Adrie C, Moine P, Asehnoune K, Fitting C, et al. (2000) NF-kappaB expression in mononuclear cells of patients with sepsis resembles that observed in lipopolysaccharide tolerance. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 162: 1877–1883.
- 37. Inan MS, Tolmacheva V, Wang QS, Rosenberg DW, Giardina C (2000) Tran-scription factor NF-kappaB participates in regulation of epithelial cell turnover in the colon. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 279: G1282–1291.
- 38. Erdman S, Fox JG, Dangler CA, Feldman D, Horwitz BH (2001) Typhlocolitis in NF-kappa B-deficient mice. J Immunol 166: 1443–1447.
- 39. Davies B, Waxman J, Wasan H, Abel P, Williams G, et al. (1993) Levels of matrix metalloproteases in bladder cancer correlate with tumor grade and invasion. Cancer Res 53: 5365–5369.
- 40. Lee SJ, Park SS, Cho YH, Park K, Kim EJ, et al. (2008) Activation of matrix metal-loproteinase-9 by TNF-alpha in human urinary bladder cancer HT1376 cells: the role of MAP kinase signaling path-ways. Oncol Rep 19: 1007–1013.
- 41. Lee SJ, Park SS, Lee US, Kim WJ, Moon SK (2008) Signaling pathway for TNF-alpha-induced MMP-9 expression: media-tion through p38 MAP kinase, and inhibition by anti-cancer molecule magnolol in human urinary bladder cancer 5637 cells. Int Immunopharmacol 8: 1821–1826.
- 42. Nutt JE, Durkan GC, Mellon JK, Lunec J (2003) Matrix metallo-proteinases (MMPs) in bladder cancer: the induction of MMP9 by epidermal growth factor and its detection in urine. BJU Int 91: 99–104.
- 43. Shin KY, Moon HS, Park HY, Lee TY, Woo YN, et al. (2000) Effects of tumor necrosis factor-alpha and interferon-gamma on expressions of matrix metalloproteinase-2 and -9 in human bladder cancer cells. Cancer Lett 159: 127–134.
- 44. Liotta LA (1986) Tumor invasion and metastasis-role of extracellular matrix: Rhoads Memorial Award Lecture. Cancer Res 46: 1–7.
- 45. Matrisian LM (1990) Metalloproteinases and their inhibitors in matrix remodeling. Trends Genet 6: 121–125.
- 46. Murta-Nascimento C, Schmitz-Dräger BJ, Zeegers MP, Steineck G, Kogevinas M, et al. (2007) Epidemiology of urinary bladder cancer: from tumor development to patient's death. World J Urol 25: 285–95.
- 47. Shariat SF, Milowsky M, Droller MJ (2009) Bladder cancer in the elderly. Urol Oncol 27: 653–67.
- 48. Zeegers MP, Kellen E, Buntinx F, van den Brandt PA (2004) The association between smoking, beverage consumption, diet and bladder cancer: a systematic literature review. World J Urol 21: 392–401.
- 49. Shariat SF, Sfakianos JP, Droller MJ, Karakiewicz PI, Meryn S, et al. (2010) The effect of age and gender on bladder cancer: a critical review of the literature. BJU Int 105: 300–8.
- 50. Murta-Nascimento C, Silverman DT, Kogevinas M, García-Closas M, Rothman N, et al. (2007) Risk of bladder cancer associated with family history of cancer: do low-penetrance polymorphisms account for the increase in risk? Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2007 Aug 16(8): 1595–600.