Figures
Abstract
It remains uncertain if the contralesional primary sensorimotor cortex (CL_PSMC) contributes to motor recovery after stroke. Here we investigated longitudinal changes in the resting-state functional connectivity (rsFC) of the CL_PSMC and their association with motor recovery. Thirteen patients who had experienced subcortical stroke underwent a series of resting-state fMRI and clinical assessments over a period of 1 year at 5 time points, i.e., within the first week, at 2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months, and 1 year after stroke onset. Thirteen age- and gender-matched healthy subjects were recruited as controls. The CL_PSMC was defined as a region centered at the voxel that had greatest activation during hand motion task. The dynamic changes in the rsFCs of the CL_PSMC within the whole brain were evaluated and correlated with the Motricity Index (MI) scores. Compared with healthy controls, the rsFCs of the CL_PSMC with the bilateral PSMC were initially decreased, then gradually increased, and finally restored to the normal level 1 year later. Moreover, the dynamic change in the inter-hemispheric rsFC between the bilateral PSMC in these patients was positively correlated with the MI scores. However, the intra-hemispheric rsFC of the CL_PSMC was not correlated with the MI scores. This study shows dynamic changes in the rsFCs of the CL_PSMC after stroke and suggests that the increased inter-hemispheric rsFC between the bilateral PSMC may facilitate motor recovery in stroke patients. However, generalization of our findings is limited by the small sample size of our study and needs to be confirmed.
Citation: Xu H, Qin W, Chen H, Jiang L, Li K, Yu C (2014) Contribution of the Resting-State Functional Connectivity of the Contralesional Primary Sensorimotor Cortex to Motor Recovery after Subcortical Stroke. PLoS ONE 9(1): e84729. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0084729
Editor: Nicole Wenderoth, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium
Received: June 13, 2013; Accepted: November 19, 2013; Published: January 8, 2014
Copyright: © 2014 Xu et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Funding: This study was supported by the National Basic Research Program of China (973 program, 2011CB707804), the Natural Science Foundation of China (81271564), and the Natural Science Foundation of Tianjin (12JCZDJC23800). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Introduction
Motor disability is one of the most common deficits after stroke. Irrespective of the type and amount of therapy, nearly all stroke patients experience at least some predictable degree of functional recovery within the first six months after stroke [1], [2]. This spontaneous motor recovery may be associated with structural and functional reorganization of the motor network [3], [4]. In the first days to weeks after stroke, increased activity in both hemispheres has been reported during movements of the paretic hand [5]–[8]. Although this increased activation in the contralesional primary sensorimotor cortex (CL_PSMC) after stroke is highly consistent across experiments [9], its functional relevance is a matter of debate. The increased activation of the CL_PSMC has been considered to either facilitate [7], [10]–[14] or inhibit motor recovery [15]–[17]. Based on the theory of interhemispheric inhibition, the increased activation in the CL_PSMC is a result of reduced inhibition from the ipsilesional PSMC early after stroke [18]. Inhibiting the activity of the CL_PSMC by repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) improves motor performance [19]–[22]. However, other groups have not observed the effect of motor improvement using the same method [23], [24]. On the contrary, a previous study reports deteriorated motor performance after inhibition of the CL_PSMC [25].
Resting-state functional connectivity (rsFC) reflects the temporal synchrony of functional MRI signals between remote regions and has been applied to stroke patients. Much attention has been paid to changes in the rsFCs of the ipsilesional PSMC after stroke [26]–[29]. Studies thus far have found that these rsFCs were initially decreased, then gradually increased during recovery, and were finally restored to near normal or above normal levels [26]–[29]. However, the dynamic changes in the rsFCs of the CL_PSMC after stroke remain unclear.
In the current study, we investigated dynamic changes in the rsFCs of the CL_PSMC and their correlations with motor recovery in subcortical stroke patients using a mixed-effects model to determine the functional relevance of the rsFCs of the CL_PSMC to the motor recovery.
Subjects and Methods
Subjects
Thirteen right-handed patients (all males; age 49.2±7.1 years, range 35–64 years) with subcortical ischemic stroke in the left (n = 8) or right (n = 5) motor pathways were enrolled from the inpatient service at the Xuanwu Hospital of Capital Medical University (Beijing, China). All patients were first-onset stroke patients who showed motor deficits in both the upper and lower extremities. None of them had a history of neurological or psychiatric disorders, nor did any experience subsequent symptomatic stroke. Conventional MR images did not show any abnormalities in the patients other than the infarct lesion. Thirteen age- and gender-matched right-handed healthy subjects (all males; age 49.6±6.8 years, range 35–64 years) were also recruited for comparison. The Ethics Committee of Xuanwu Hospital approved this study, and written informed consent was obtained from each patient or control subject.
The motor function of each patient was assessed using the Motricity Index (MI) [30] by Dr. Hai Chen who had 10-years experience in neurology. This scale measures motor abilities including hand-grasp, elbow flexion, shoulder abduction, ankle dorsiflexion, knee extension and hip flexion in the limbs on the affected side. The reliability and validity of this scale have been confirmed [31], [32]. The patients were scanned and clinically assessed at five consecutive time points, i.e. within the first week, at 2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months, and 1 year after stroke onset. The clinical characteristics and demographic data are summarized in Table 1 and the lesion of each stroke patient is shown in Figure 1.
The lesions are shown on axial slices of the T2-weighted images. Patient numbers correspond with those in Table 1. L, left and R, right.
MR Image Acquisition
All images were acquired using a Siemens Trio 3.0 Tesla MRI scanner (Siemens, Erlangen, Germany). Tight but comfortable foam padding was used to minimize head motion, and earplugs were used to reduce scanner noise. Functional MR images were collected using an echo-planar imaging (EPI) sequence with the following scan parameters: repetition time (TR)/echo time (TE) = 2000/30 ms; field of view (FOV) = 220 mm×220 mm; matrix = 64×64; flip angle (FA) = 90°; slice thickness = 3 mm; gap = 1 mm; 32 interleaved transversal slices; and 180 volumes. During the fMRI scans, all subjects were instructed to keep their eyes closed, stay as motionless as possible, think of nothing in particular, and not fall asleep. Structural images were obtained in the sagittal orientation by employing a magnetization prepared rapid gradient echo sequence over the whole brain: 176 slices, thickness/gap = 1.0/0 mm, matrix = 256×224, TR = 1600 ms, TE = 2.6 ms, FA = 9°, and FOV = 256 mm×224 mm. T2-weighted images were acquired using a turbo-spin-echo sequence: 20 axial slices, thickness/gap = 5.0/6.5 mm, matrix = 512×416, TR = 4140 ms, TE = 92 ms, and FOV = 187 mm×230 mm.
Data Preprocessing
Before data preprocessing, we flipped the imaging data from right to left along the midsagittal line for the 5 patients who had lesions on the right hemisphere. For all patients, the left side corresponded to the ipsilesional hemisphere and the right side corresponded to the contralesional hemisphere. Preprocessing was performed using statistical parametric mapping (SPM8, http://www.fil.ion.ucl.ac.uk/spm). The first ten volumes of each subject were discarded to allow the signal to reach equilibrium and the participants to adapt to the scanning noise. The remaining 170 volumes were first corrected for the acquisition time delay between different slices and were then realigned to the first volume to correct for inter-scan movements. We controlled for head motion using a threshold of 2.5 mm translation in each cardinal direction and 2.5° rotation in each of the orthogonal x-, y- and z-axes. We also calculated the frame-wise displacement (FD), which indexes the volume-to-volume changes in head position that were obtained from derivatives of the rigid body realignment estimates that are used to realign BOLD data during fMRI preprocessing [33]. The average FD was considered as a nuisance covariate in the rsFC analyses. The realigned fMRI images were spatially normalized to Montreal Neurological Institute (MNI) space using the EPI template and were then re-sampled into a voxel size of 3×3×3 mm3. After normalization, the images were smoothed using a Gaussian kernel of 8×8×8 mm3 full-width at half maximum. Several sources of spurious variances from the estimated motion parameters, global average BOLD signals, and average BOLD signals in the ventricular and white matter regions were removed from the data through linear regression. Finally, temporal band-pass filtering (0.01–0.08 Hz) was performed on the time series of each voxel to reduce the effects of low-frequency drift and high-frequency noise [34]. Although global signal regression may partly reduce the effects of physiological noise and head motion, several studies have reported that global signal regression can influence the pattern of rsFC [35], [36]. To validate the robustness of our results, we also analyzed the fMRI data without global signal regression.
Definition of Seed Region
The seed region for rsFC analysis was defined as the CL_PSMC based on a previous work with a hand-grasping task using the left hand in 11 healthy subjects (4 females and 7 males; age 54.8±7.6 years).The motor task activated the right PSMC with a peak MNI coordinate of 36, −33, 54. The seed region of the CL_PSMC was defined as a sphere with a radius of 9 mm which centered at the peak MNI coordinates (Fig. 2) (Please see details in Method S1).
Red-yellow areas show activation of the right PSMC acquired by the left hand-grasping task of 11 normal controls, and the blue area indicates the seed region of the CL_PSMC. BOLD, blood oxygen level dependent; CL, contralesional hemisphere; L, left; PSMC, primary sensorimotor cortex; and R, right.
Calculation of the rsFCs of the CL_PSMC
For each subject, Pearson correlation coefficients between the mean time course of the seed region and that of every voxel in the brain were computed and converted to z-values using Fisher’s r-to-z transformation to improve normality. Each individuals’ z-values were entered into a random-effect one-sample t-test in a voxel-wise manner to identify brain regions that showed positive correlations with the seed region (Fig. 3). Multiple comparisons were corrected using the False Discovery Rate (FDR, P<0.05) method with a cluster size of >30 voxels.
(A) Normal controls. (B) Stroke patients. CL, contralesional hemisphere; IL, ipsilesional hemisphere; L, left; PSMC, primary sensorimotor cortex; and R, right.
Longitudinal Analysis
To investigate the dynamic change in the rsFCs between the CL_PSMC and other brain regions after stroke, a linear mixed model was employed to characterize monotonic changes in the rsFCs over time. The random intercept term accounts for the correlation due to repeated measurements within single patient [37]. This model might allow us to make the utmost use of all available data for each patient, even if some time points were missing. Each patient was assumed to possess a common slope (fixed effect) where only the intercepts were allowed to vary (random effect). The model was expressed as the following equation:(1)where Yij is each rsFC from the jth scan (up to five scans) of the ith patient (i≦13, j≦5);
is the intercept term that is common to all subjects;
is a random intercept allowing a unique intercept for each patient;
is the scalar of the fixed effect; Xij is the time interval (i.e., days after stroke);
is the number of subjects; and
is the residual error of the model. The model parameters were estimated by the restricted maximum likelihood method and considered significant if the P values were <0.05.
To analyze the relationship between the rsFC changes and motor function after stroke, we also applied this mixed-effect model to investigate the correlations between changes in the rsFCs and motor recovery, in which Xij is the MI score from the jth time point of the ith patient post-stroke.
Using SPSS 13.0 for Windows (SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL, USA), we also compared the rsFCs of patients at different time points and healthy subjects. Here, a general linear model (GLM) was applied with individual variation for random factors and different time points for fixed factors (P<0.05). The GLM was also used to test the motor recovery (P<0.05) by treating the variation in the MI scores of each individual as random factor and different time points as fixed factor.
Results
Behavioral Data
Demographic and clinical characteristics of stroke patients are listed in Table 1. The time intervals between stroke onset and each session were as follows: session 1 (mean ± SD: 4±2 days post-stroke), session 2 (15±2 days), session 3 (35±11 days), session 4 (mean ± SD: 92±18 days), and session 5 (352±54 days). Five patients completed all 5 sessions, 7 patients finished 4 sessions, and 1 patient completed 3 sessions. The lesions are shown on T2-weighted images of the first session (Fig. 1). The average size of stroke lesions was 9.04±7.74 ml. The MI score of each time point is shown in Table 1. Based on the MI score, all patients demonstrated significant recovery (P<0.05), and the recovery curves of these stroke patients are shown in Fig. 4. The mean MI scores at 1 week, 2 weeks, 3 months and 1 year post stroke were 31.0±2.5, 46.2±2.3, 56.6±2.5, 68.3±2.5, and 75.7±2.7, respectively. The MI scores were significantly different between all time points (P<0.005), except between 3 months and 1 year post stroke (P = 0.056).
The x-axis denotes days after stroke onset; and the y-axis denotes MI scores (ranging from 0 to 100, 100 represents complete recovery). MI, motricity index.
Longitudinal Changes in the rsFCs of the CL_PSMC
In the voxel-based rsFC analysis, the bilateral PSMC exhibited linearly increased rsFCs with the CL_PSMC after stroke (Fig. 5 and Table 2), but no brain region showed significantly decreased rsFC with the CL_PSMC after stroke (Table 2). We further compared the strengths of the rsFCs across healthy controls and patients at different time points (Fig. 5). Compared with healthy controls, stroke patients showed a decreased interhemispheric rsFC between the bilateral PSMC immediately after stroke onset that reached the lowest level at two weeks. This decreased rsFC restored to a near normal level at 3 months post-stroke and then increased to the normal level 1 year after stroke (Fig. 5C). When comparing intrahemispheric rsFC of the CL_PSMC of stroke patient to those of healthy control, the rsFC did not show significant decrease within one week and slightly decreased at two weeks. Subsequently, this rsFC was gradually increased to the near or above normal level (Fig. 5D).
Brain regions show increased rsFCs with the CL_PSMC after stroke in the ipsilesional (A) and contralesional hemispheres (B). (C) and (D) show group comparisons of inter-hemispheric and intra-hemispheric rsFC of healthy subjects and patients at 5 time points. Bars represent the means, error bars represent the SDs, and stars represent the significant differences between groups. NC, normal control; TP, time points; CL, contralesional hemisphere; IL, ipsilesional hemisphere; PSMC, primary sensorimotor cortex; and rsFC, resting-state functional connectivity.
The Associations of rsFC Longitudinal Changes with Clinical Scores
A mixed-effects model was applied to further explore the relationship between the rsFC and motor performance after stroke. A positive correlation with MI scores was found only in the rsFC between the bilateral PSMC (t = 2.28, P = 0.028) during stroke recovery (Fig. 6), and no significant correlations (t = 1.24, P = 0.223) were evident between the MI scores and intrahemispheric rsFC of the CL_PSMC.
The x-axis represents MI scores at each time point after stroke, and the y-axis denotes the rsFC of the bilateral PSMC. CL, contralesional hemisphere; IL, ipsilesional hemisphere; MI, motricity index; PSMC, primary sensorimotor cortex; and rsFC, resting-state functional connectivity.
The Effect of Global Signal Regression on the Results
The above-mentioned analyses were repeated on the fMRI data with the same preprocessing steps but without global signal regression. The results were described in Result S1 and the difference between both analyses was judged visually. The results derived from the fMRI data without global signal regression were similar to those after global signal regression (Figures S1–S6).
Discussion
To our knowledge, this is the first longitudinal study aimed to elucidate the functional relevance of the rsFCs of the CL_PSMC with motor recovery after subcortical stroke. We found that only a dynamic change in the inter-hemispheric rsFC between the bilateral PSMC was associated with motor recovery in stroke patients. This finding is in line with a previous study that reported increased rsFC of the motor network in stroke patients following an electroencephalography-based brain computer interface training program with motor imagery [38]. It should be noted that only patients with subcortical stroke were included in this study to improve the homogeneity of the patient population because cortical+subcortical and subcortical stroke patients have been shown to use completely different neural mechanisms for motor recovery [39], [40].
Decreased rsFCs of the CL_PSMC at the Acute Stage of Stroke
We found decreased rsFCs between the bilateral PSMC at acute stage of stroke, which is consistent with prior findings from both rats and humans. In stroke rats with lesions that comprised subcortical and cortical tissue [36], [37], the rsFC between the bilateral PSMC significantly decreased during the first days after stroke [41], which is paralleled by sensorimotor function deficits. Moreover, the reduced inter-hemispheric rsFC in these stroke rats was also accompanied by a decrease in transcallosal manganese transfer between these regions [42]. The latter finding reflects anatomical disconnection, which may underlie the impaired inter-hemispheric rsFC. Consistent with these results from animal experiments, an early decrease in the inter-hemispheric rsFC of the motor system of humans has been reported not only in subcortical stroke patients [26], [28], [29], [43] but also in stroke patients with cortical+subcortical lesions [26], [27]. The rsFC impairment between inter-hemispheric homogeneous regions is not confined to the motor system. In stroke patients with spatial neglect [26], [44] and aphasia [45], reduced inter-hemispheric rsFC was also found between areas related to attention or language.
At acute stage of stroke, we found reduced inter-hemispheric rsFC, which has been correlated with impairment of the corticospinal tract (CST) in subcortical stroke patients [43], [46]. At this stage, the bilateral PSMC remain relatively intact because subcortical lesions require months to affect the cortical regions via the retrograde degeneration mechanism [47]. Thus direct cortical impairments cannot explain for the reduced inter-hemispheric rsFC at this stage. The most possible explanation for this finding is inter-hemispheric diaschisis, which may transiently influence electrical activity, blood flow, metabolism, and possibly the rsFC [48], [49].
Longitudinal Changes in the Inter-hemispheric rsFC of the PSMC after Stroke
After the initial reduction in the rsFC between the bilateral PSMC, the rsFC gradually increased during the recovery progress following stroke. More importantly, the linearly increased inter-hemispheric rsFC was correlated with motor recovery in these patients. In stroke rats with lesions that comprised subcortical and cortical tissue [41], the initially decreased rsFC between the bilateral PSMC was gradually restores and the temporal pattern of changes in the inter-hemispheric rsFC was significantly correlated with the evolution of sensorimotor function scores [41]. Subsequently, these authors found that the degree of functional recovery after stroke was associated with the extent of reinstatement of the inter-hemispheric rsFC [46]. Similar dynamic evolution and functional relevance of the rsFC between the bilateral PSMC have been observed in stroke patients with subcortical lesions [28] and lesions in cortical and subcortical tissue [26]–[29]. Although the neural mechanisms for the reinstatement of the inter-hemispheric rsFC remain unclear, it may be related to the disappearance of the transient transhemispheric diaschisis [49] and axons sprouting to establish new connections and projections [50], [51].
Longitudinal Changes in the Intra-hemispheric rsFC of the CL_PSMC after Stroke
We also found a trend of an initial reduction and subsequent increase in the intra-hemispheric rsFC of the CL_PSMC following subcortical stroke. The increased intra-hemispheric rsFC within the CL_PSMC has also been previously reported in stroke rats with both subcortical and cortical lesions [41], [42]. The increased intra-hemispheric rsFC within the CL_PSMC at one year post-stroke may be associated with the remodeling of neuronal elements, i.e., axonal sprouting, synaptogenesis, and dendritic growth, which has been detected in various animal stroke models [3], [52]. We demonstrated that the intra-hemispheric rsFC of the CL_PSMC did not correlate with the restoration of motor function and was not significantly different from those of the healthy controls at any time point. These findings are consistent with previous reports on the non-significant contribution of intrahemispheric rsFC to motor recovery in stroke patients [26]. Of course, we cannot exclude the possibility that our monotonic linear model is not the best one for modeling association between changes in intra-hemispheric rsFC of the CL_PSMC and motor recovery. Further studies should be performed to determine the best statistical model for modeling longitudinal changes of the MRI and behavioral measures after stroke.
The Functional Relevance of the CL_PSMC to Motor Recovery after Stroke
It seems contradictory that the motion-elicited-activation of the affected hand in the CL_PSMC is initially increased and then gradually reduced to the normal level [7], [53], whereas the rsFCs of the CL_PSMC are initially reduced and then gradually increased to the normal level. The nearly inversed patterns in activation changes and rsFC of the CL_PSMC make it difficult to infer the functional relevance of the CL_PSMC in motor recovery after stroke. Actually, the debate on the functional relevance of the CL_PSMC in motor recovery also comes from other contradictory findings obtained by fMRI and TMS studies [18]–[25]. Although the activation of the CL_PSMC was reported to play an important role in subcortical stroke patients performing complex motor tasks [8], [17], [25], [54], this increased activation is more frequently reported in stroke patients with poor recovery [17], [49] and negatively correlates with motor recovery [48], [49]. Moreover, effective connectivity and TMS studies on interhemispheric inhibition suggested that the CL_PSMC exerted increased inhibitory influences on ipsilesional PSMC in subcortical stroke patients, thus preventing patients from motor recovery [55]–[57]. The complex changes in the functional characteristics of the CL_PSMC may depend on multiple factors, such as the extent of damage in the motor cortex, time intervals after stroke, and task complexity. Severe damage of the motor cortex (such as cortical stroke) may predict the increased activation of the CL_PSMC during the movement of the affected hand, suggesting a compensatory role in motor recovery. In contrast, in stroke patients with a relatively intact motor cortex (such as subcortical stroke), the initially increased activation of the CL_PSMC may compensate for the insult; however, the persistent high activity in the CL_PSMC, especially at the recovery stage, may exert an increased inhibitory influence on ipsilesional PSMC, thereby preventing patients from motor recovery. In stroke patients, the increased activation of the CL_PSMC during complex motor tasks suggests that more neural resources should be recruited in this situation.
The inter-hemispheric rsFC of the PSMC may play a crucial role in the bimanual coordination of motor execution [58], [59]. The initial reduction of this rsFC may indicate functional dysfunction that is caused by transient transhemispheric diaschisis [49]. The subsequent reinstatement of the inter-hemispheric rsFC may represent functional recovery, which is associated with the disappearance of the transient transhemispheric diaschisis and the formation of new connections [50], [51].
Limitations
One limitation of this study is the relatively small sample size and percentage of dropouts from the long-term follow-up; thus, further validation of our findings is necessary. The small sample size also prevents us from evaluating the influence of the severity of initial motor impairment on the longitudinal brain reorganization after stroke. Although only stroke patients with subcortical lesions were included, the relatively large difference in lesion location and volume might have impacted on current study results. However, correlation analysis did not show any significant correlations between lesion volume and the rsFC of the CL_PSMC or MI scores at each time point. Longitudinal follow-up of a larger study sample with lesion subgroups is required to verify current study results. The MI is a quick and easy to administer assessment scale, though it only provides a crude scoring of a patient’s motor function. Moreover, we did not distinguish upper limb from lower limb recovery, which are known to exhibit a different recovery pattern [60]. Since global signal regression may influence the rsFC analysis [35], [36], we tested the effects of global signal regression on our results and did not find any significant differences between the results with and without global signal regression, suggesting the robustness of our findings.
Conclusions
Using a longitudinal design, we investigated the dynamic changes in the rsFCs of the CL_PSMC after subcortical stroke and found that both the inter-hemispheric and intra-hemispheric rsFCs of the CL_PSMC experienced significant changes. We also found that only the inter-hemispheric rsFC of the PSMC correlated with motor recovery. Our findings suggest that monitoring the rsFC between the bilateral PSMC may be a potential tool for evaluating and predicting the motor recovery of subcortical stroke patients.
Supporting Information
Figure S1.
The rsFC pattern of the PSMC in normal control without global signal regression (q <0.05; FDR corrected). CL, contralesional hemisphere; FDR, false discovery rate; IL, ipsilesional hemisphere; PSMC, primary sensorimotor cortex; and rsFC, resting-state functional connectivity.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0084729.s001
(TIF)
Figure S2.
The rsFC pattern of the CL_PSMC in subcortical stroke patients without global mean regression (q <0.05; FDR corrected). CL, contralesional hemisphere; FDR, false discovery rate; IL, ipsilesional hemisphere; PSMC, primary sensorimotor cortex; and rsFC, resting-state functional connectivity.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0084729.s002
(TIF)
Figure S3.
The rsFC pattern of the PSMC in normal control with global signal regression (q <0.05; FDR corrected). CL, contralesional hemisphere; FDR, false discovery rate; IL, ipsilesional hemisphere; PSMC, primary sensorimotor cortex; and rsFC, resting-state functional connectivity.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0084729.s003
(TIF)
Figure S4.
The rsFC pattern of the CL_PSMC in subcortical stroke patients with global mean regression (q <0.05; FDR corrected). CL, contralesional hemisphere; FDR, false discovery rate; IL, ipsilesional hemisphere; PSMC, primary sensorimotor cortex; and rsFC, resting-state functional connectivity.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0084729.s004
(TIF)
Figure S5.
The linear changes of the rsFCs of the CL_PSMC after subcortical stroke. (A) The result without global signal regression of the resting-state fMRI data (q <0.05; FDR corrected); (B) Overlapping of the results with (yellow) and without (red) global signal regression. CL, contralesional hemisphere; FDR, false discovery rate; IL, ipsilesional hemisphere; PSMC, primary sensorimotor cortex; and rsFC, resting-state functional connectivity.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0084729.s005
(TIF)
Figure S6.
ROI-based comparisons of the significant rsFC across time points using fMRI data without global mean regression while with FD regressed. FD, frame-wise displacement; NC, normal control; PSMC, primary sensorimotor cortex; rsFC, resting-state functional connectivity; and TP, time points.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0084729.s006
(TIF)
Method S1.
Definition of seed region of the contralesional primary sensorimotor cortex.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0084729.s007
(DOC)
Result S1.
Analyzing Results without global signal regression.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0084729.s008
(DOC)
Author Contributions
Conceived and designed the experiments: CY KL. Performed the experiments: WQ HC. Analyzed the data: HX WQ LJ. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: WQ. Wrote the paper: HX WQ CY.
References
- 1. Kwakkel G, Kollen B, Lindeman E (2004) Understanding the pattern of functional recovery after stroke: facts and theories. Restor Neurol Neurosci 22: 281–299.
- 2. Kwakkel G, Kollen B, Twisk J (2006) Impact of time on improvement of outcome after stroke. Stroke 37: 2348–2353.
- 3. Nudo RJ (2006) Mechanisms for recovery of motor function following cortical damage. Curr Opin Neurobiol 16: 638–644.
- 4. Cramer SC (2008) Repairing the human brain after stroke: I. Mechanisms of spontaneous recovery. Ann Neurol 63: 272–287.
- 5. Chollet F, DiPiero V, Wise RJ, Brooks DJ, Dolan RJ, et al. (1991) The functional anatomy of motor recovery after stroke in humans: a study with positron emission tomography. Ann Neurol 29: 63–71.
- 6. Weiller C, Chollet F, Friston KJ, Wise RJ, Frackowiak RS (1992) Functional reorganization of the brain in recovery from striatocapsular infarction in man. Ann Neurol 31: 463–472.
- 7. Ward NS, Brown MM, Thompson AJ, Frackowiak RS (2003) Neural correlates of motor recovery after stroke: a longitudinal fMRI study. Brain 126: 2476–2496.
- 8. Gerloff C, Bushara K, Sailer A, Wassermann EM, Chen R, et al. (2006) Multimodal imaging of brain reorganization in motor areas of the contralesional hemisphere of well recovered patients after capsular stroke. Brain 129: 791–808.
- 9. Rehme AK, Eickhoff SB, Rottschy C, Fink GR, Grefkes C (2012) Activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis of motor-related neural activity after stroke. Neuroimage 59: 2771–2782.
- 10. Calautti C, Leroy F, Guincestre JY, Baron JC (2001) Dynamics of motor network overactivation after striatocapsular stroke: a longitudinal PET study using a fixed-performance paradigm. Stroke 32: 2534–2542.
- 11. Jaillard A, Martin CD, Garambois K, Lebas JF, Hommel M (2005) Vicarious function within the human primary motor cortex? A longitudinal fMRI stroke study. Brain 128: 1122–1138.
- 12. Loubinoux I, Carel C, Pariente J, Dechaumont S, Albucher JF, et al. (2003) Correlation between cerebral reorganization and motor recovery after subcortical infarcts. Neuroimage 20: 2166–2180.
- 13. Rehme AK, Fink GR, von Cramon DY, Grefkes C (2011) The role of the contralesional motor cortex for motor recovery in the early days after stroke assessed with longitudinal FMRI. Cereb Cortex 21: 756–768.
- 14. Tombari D, Loubinoux I, Pariente J, Gerdelat A, Albucher JF, et al. (2004) A longitudinal fMRI study: in recovering and then in clinically stable sub-cortical stroke patients. Neuroimage 23: 827–839.
- 15. Johansen-Berg H, Rushworth MF, Bogdanovic MD, Kischka U, Wimalaratna S, et al. (2002) The role of ipsilateral premotor cortex in hand movement after stroke. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99: 14518–14523.
- 16. Ward NS, Newton JM, Swayne OB, Lee L, Frackowiak RS, et al. (2007) The relationship between brain activity and peak grip force is modulated by corticospinal system integrity after subcortical stroke. Eur J Neurosci 25: 1865–1873.
- 17. Schaechter JD, Perdue KL, Wang R (2008) Structural damage to the corticospinal tract correlates with bilateral sensorimotor cortex reorganization in stroke patients. Neuroimage 39: 1370–1382.
- 18. Swayne OB, Rothwell JC, Ward NS, Greenwood RJ (2008) Stages of motor output reorganization after hemispheric stroke suggested by longitudinal studies of cortical physiology. Cereb Cortex 18: 1909–1922.
- 19. Mansur CG, Fregni F, Boggio PS, Riberto M, Gallucci-Neto J, et al. (2005) A sham stimulation-controlled trial of rTMS of the unaffected hemisphere in stroke patients. Neurology 64: 1802–1804.
- 20. Takeuchi N, Chuma T, Matsuo Y, Watanabe I, Ikoma K (2005) Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of contralesional primary motor cortex improves hand function after stroke. Stroke 36: 2681–2686.
- 21. Nowak DA, Grefkes C, Dafotakis M, Eickhoff S, Kust J, et al. (2008) Effects of low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the contralesional primary motor cortex on movement kinematics and neural activity in subcortical stroke. Arch Neurol 65: 741–747.
- 22. Grefkes C, Nowak DA, Wang LE, Dafotakis M, Eickhoff SB, et al. (2010) Modulating cortical connectivity in stroke patients by rTMS assessed with fMRI and dynamic causal modeling. Neuroimage 50: 233–242.
- 23. Werhahn KJ, Conforto AB, Kadom N, Hallett M, Cohen LG (2003) Contribution of the ipsilateral motor cortex to recovery after chronic stroke. Ann Neurol 54: 464–472.
- 24. Talelli P, Wallace A, Dileone M, Hoad D, Cheeran B, et al. (2012) Theta burst stimulation in the rehabilitation of the upper limb: a semirandomized, placebo-controlled trial in chronic stroke patients. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 26: 976–987.
- 25. Lotze M, Markert J, Sauseng P, Hoppe J, Plewnia C, et al. (2006) The role of multiple contralesional motor areas for complex hand movements after internal capsular lesion. J Neurosci 26: 6096–6102.
- 26. Carter AR, Astafiev SV, Lang CE, Connor LT, Rengachary J, et al. (2010) Resting interhemispheric functional magnetic resonance imaging connectivity predicts performance after stroke. Ann Neurol 67: 365–375.
- 27. Golestani AM, Tymchuk S, Demchuk A, Goodyear BG (2013) Longitudinal evaluation of resting-state FMRI after acute stroke with hemiparesis. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 27: 153–163.
- 28. Park CH, Chang WH, Ohn SH, Kim ST, Bang OY, et al. (2011) Longitudinal changes of resting-state functional connectivity during motor recovery after stroke. Stroke 42: 1357–1362.
- 29. Wang L, Yu C, Chen H, Qin W, He Y, et al. (2010) Dynamic functional reorganization of the motor execution network after stroke. Brain 133: 1224–1238.
- 30. Demeurisse G, Demol O, Robaye E (1980) Motor evaluation in vascular hemiplegia. Eur Neurol 19: 382–389.
- 31. Cameron D, Bohannon RW (2000) Criterion validity of lower extremity Motricity Index scores. Clin Rehabil 14: 208–211.
- 32. W Bohannon R (1999) Motricity Index Scores are Valid Indicators of Paretic Upper Extremity Strength Following Stroke. Journal of Physical Therapy Science 11: 59–61.
- 33. Power JD, Barnes KA, Snyder AZ, Schlaggar BL, Petersen SE (2012) Spurious but systematic correlations in functional connectivity MRI networks arise from subject motion. Neuroimage 59: 2142–2154.
- 34. Greicius MD, Krasnow B, Reiss AL, Menon V (2003) Functional connectivity in the resting brain: a network analysis of the default mode hypothesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100: 253–258.
- 35. Murphy K, Birn RM, Handwerker DA, Jones TB, Bandettini PA (2009) The impact of global signal regression on resting state correlations: are anti-correlated networks introduced? Neuroimage 44: 893–905.
- 36. Saad ZS, Gotts SJ, Murphy K, Chen G, Jo HJ, et al. (2012) Trouble at rest: how correlation patterns and group differences become distorted after global signal regression. Brain Connect 2: 25–32.
- 37. Gibbons RD, Hedeker D, Waternaux C, Davis JM (1988) Random regression models: a comprehensive approach to the analysis of longitudinal psychiatric data. Psychopharmacol Bull 24: 438–443.
- 38. Varkuti B, Guan C, Pan Y, Phua KS, Ang KK, et al. (2013) Resting state changes in functional connectivity correlate with movement recovery for BCI and robot-assisted upper-extremity training after stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 27: 53–62.
- 39. Feydy A, Carlier R, Roby-Brami A, Bussel B, Cazalis F, et al. (2002) Longitudinal study of motor recovery after stroke: recruitment and focusing of brain activation. Stroke 33: 1610–1617.
- 40. Luft AR, Waller S, Forrester L, Smith GV, Whitall J, et al. (2004) Lesion location alters brain activation in chronically impaired stroke survivors. Neuroimage 21: 924–935.
- 41. van Meer MP, van der Marel K, Wang K, Otte WM, El Bouazati S, et al. (2010) Recovery of sensorimotor function after experimental stroke correlates with restoration of resting-state interhemispheric functional connectivity. J Neurosci 30: 3964–3972.
- 42. van Meer MP, van der Marel K, Otte WM, Berkelbach van der Sprenkel JW, Dijkhuizen RM (2010) Correspondence between altered functional and structural connectivity in the contralesional sensorimotor cortex after unilateral stroke in rats: a combined resting-state functional MRI and manganese-enhanced MRI study. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 30: 1707–1711.
- 43. Carter AR, Patel KR, Astafiev SV, Snyder AZ, Rengachary J, et al. (2012) Upstream dysfunction of somatomotor functional connectivity after corticospinal damage in stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 26: 7–19.
- 44. He BJ, Snyder AZ, Vincent JL, Epstein A, Shulman GL, et al. (2007) Breakdown of functional connectivity in frontoparietal networks underlies behavioral deficits in spatial neglect. Neuron 53: 905–918.
- 45. Warren JE, Crinion JT, Lambon Ralph MA, Wise RJ (2009) Anterior temporal lobe connectivity correlates with functional outcome after aphasic stroke. Brain 132: 3428–3442.
- 46. van Meer MP, Otte WM, van der Marel K, Nijboer CH, Kavelaars A, et al. (2012) Extent of bilateral neuronal network reorganization and functional recovery in relation to stroke severity. J Neurosci 32: 4495–4507.
- 47. Cowey A, Alexander I, Stoerig P (2011) Transneuronal retrograde degeneration of retinal ganglion cells and optic tract in hemianopic monkeys and humans. Brain 134: 2149–2157.
- 48. Feeney DM, Baron JC (1986) Diaschisis. Stroke 17: 817–830.
- 49. Andrews RJ (1991) Transhemispheric diaschisis. A review and comment. Stroke 22: 943–949.
- 50. Carmichael ST (2006) Cellular and molecular mechanisms of neural repair after stroke: making waves. Ann Neurol 59: 735–742.
- 51. Carmichael ST (2008) Themes and strategies for studying the biology of stroke recovery in the poststroke epoch. Stroke 39: 1380–1388.
- 52. Dancause N (2006) Neurophysiological and anatomical plasticity in the adult sensorimotor cortex. Rev Neurosci 17: 561–580.
- 53. Marshall RS, Perera GM, Lazar RM, Krakauer JW, Constantine RC, et al. (2000) Evolution of cortical activation during recovery from corticospinal tract infarction. Stroke 31: 656–661.
- 54. Riecker A, Groschel K, Ackermann H, Schnaudigel S, Kassubek J, et al. (2010) The role of the unaffected hemisphere in motor recovery after stroke. Hum Brain Mapp 31: 1017–1029.
- 55. Duque J, Hummel F, Celnik P, Murase N, Mazzocchio R, et al. (2005) Transcallosal inhibition in chronic subcortical stroke. Neuroimage 28: 940–946.
- 56. Murase N, Duque J, Mazzocchio R, Cohen LG (2004) Influence of interhemispheric interactions on motor function in chronic stroke. Ann Neurol 55: 400–409.
- 57. Grefkes C, Eickhoff SB, Nowak DA, Dafotakis M, Fink GR (2008) Dynamic intra- and interhemispheric interactions during unilateral and bilateral hand movements assessed with fMRI and DCM. Neuroimage 41: 1382–1394.
- 58. Lewis GN, Byblow WD (2004) Bimanual coordination dynamics in poststroke hemiparetics. J Mot Behav 36: 174–188.
- 59. Rose DK, Winstein CJ (2005) The co-ordination of bimanual rapid aiming movements following stroke. Clin Rehabil 19: 452–462.
- 60. Luft AR, Forrester L, Macko RF, McCombe-Waller S, Whitall J, et al. (2005) Brain activation of lower extremity movement in chronically impaired stroke survivors. Neuroimage 26: 184–194.