Figures
Abstract
Background
We carried out a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the impact of prophylactic dexamethasone on post-operative nausea and vomiting (PONV), post-operative pain, and complications in patients undergoing thyroidectomy.
Methods
We searched Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated the prophylactic effect of dexamethasone versus placebo with or without other antiemetics for PONV in patients undergoing thyroidectomy. Meta-analyses were performed using RevMan 5.0 software.
Results
Thirteen RCTs that considered high quality evidence including 2,180 patients were analyzed. The meta-analysis demonstrated a significant decrease in the incidence of PONV (RR 0.52, 95% CI 0.43 to 0.63, P<0.00001), the need for rescue anti-emetics (RR 0.42, 95% CI 0.30 to 0.57, P<0.00001), post-operative pain scores (WMD –1.17, 95% CI –1.91 to –0.44, P = 0.002), and the need for rescue analgesics (RR 0.65, 95% CI 0.50–0.83, P = 0.0008) in patients receiving dexamethasone compared to placebo, with or without concomitant antiemetics. Dexamethasone 8–10 mg had a significantly greater effect for reducing the incidence of PONV than dexamethasone 1.25–5 mg. Dexamethasone was as effective as other anti-emetics for reducing PONV (RR 1.25, 95% CI 0.86–1.81, P = 0.24). A significantly higher level of blood glucose during the immediate post-operative period in patients receiving dexamethasone compared to controls was the only adverse event.
Conclusions
Prophylactic dexamethasone 8–10 mg administered intravenously before induction of anesthesia should be recommended as a safe and effective strategy for reducing the incidence of PONV, the need for rescue anti-emetics, post-operative pain, and the need for rescue analgesia in thyroidectomy patients, except those that are pregnant, have diabetes mellitus, hyperglycemia, or contraindications for dexamethasone. More high quality trials are warranted to define the benefits and risks of prophylactic dexamethasone in potential patients with a high risk for PONV.
Citation: Zou Z, Jiang Y, Xiao M, Zhou R (2014) The Impact of Prophylactic Dexamethasone on Nausea and Vomiting after Thyroidectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. PLoS ONE 9(10): e109582. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0109582
Editor: Richard E. Burney, University of Michigan, United States of America
Received: May 23, 2014; Accepted: September 6, 2014; Published: October 16, 2014
Copyright: © 2014 Zou et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Data Availability: The authors confirm that all data underlying the findings are fully available without restriction. All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.
Funding: The authors have no support or funding to report.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Introduction
Post-operative nausea and vomiting (PONV) is a common and distressing complication associated with surgery. The overall incidence of PONV ranges from 20 to 30% in general surgery and up to 80% in high-risk surgical patients when no prophylactic anti-emetic is given [1], [2]. For patients undergoing thyroidectomy, PONV is a risk factor for post-operative bleeding [3], [4], and prophylactic anti-emetics may be beneficial.
Previous studies have shown that prophylactic dexamethasone has anti-emetic and analgesic effects. Glucocorticoids are anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive agents, and dexamethasone may exert its therapeutic actions through central inhibition of prostaglandin synthesis, by decreasing serotonin turnover in the central nervous system, and by influencing the systemic inflammatory response in favor of anti-inflammatory mediators [5]–[9].
A systematic review demonstrated that prophylactic dexamethasone was safe and effective for reducing the incidence of PONV and post-operative pain in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy compared to placebo [10]. In patients undergoing thyroidectomy, a previous meta-analysis demonstrated a significant reduction of PONV in patients treated with a single dose of dexamethasone versus placebo [11]. However, the relatively small sample size included in this review precluded the authors from drawing definitive conclusions, and the optimal dose and timing of dexamethasone administration, and efficacy of combining dexamethasone with other anti-emetics, remains unclear.
The objective of the current study was to confirm, and continue to investigate the impact of prophylactic corticosteroid administration on PONV, post-operative pain, and complications following thyroidectomy.
Methods
This systematic review and meta-analysis is reported in accordance with the recommendations of the PRISMA statement [12].
2.1 Outcome measures
2.2 Data collection and analysis
2.2.1 Searches.
We searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases from their inception to October 1, 2013 using Cochrane Highly Sensitive Search Strategies to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for potential inclusion in our review [13]. We used the following MeSH terms and keywords: thyroid surgery OR thyroidectomy AND corticosteroid, glucocorticoid, steroid, OR dexamethasone. The search strategy is summarized in Table S1. Authors’ names were entered as search terms in the PubMed database to check for additional studies. Trials were also identified using the “related articles” function in PubMed. We hand-searched reference lists from articles identified by the electronic search and from previous meta-analyses. This process was performed iteratively until no additional articles could be identified.
2.2.2 Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria.
We included RCTs that: evaluated the prophylactic effect of dexamethasone versus placebo without other anti-emetics, dexamethasone versus placebo plus concomitant administration of a different anti-emetic, dexamethasone versus a different anti-emetic, and comparisons using different doses of dexamethasone for PONV in patients undergoing thyroidectomy. The included trials reported at least one of our outcome measures, and clearly reported patient inclusion and exclusion criteria, anesthetic technique, protocols for administration of the experimental drugs, and a definition and evaluation of nausea and vomiting. Studies were excluded if they were not RCTs, included patients who were undergoing other surgical procedures concomitantly, reported insufficient data, or were duplicate studies.
2.2.3 Selection of studies.
Two reviewers (ZH Zou and YM Jiang) independently examined titles and abstracts to select eligible RCTs. We removed records that were ongoing or unpublished studies, or were published as abstracts or conference proceedings. Where datasets were overlapping or duplicated, only the most recent information was included. We retrieved the full text of potentially relevant studies. Two reviewers (ZH Zou and YM Jiang) independently examined the full text records to determine which studies met the inclusion criteria. We resolved disagreements about selection of studies by discussion and consensus.
2.2.4 Data extraction and management.
Two reviewers (ZH Zou and YM Jiang) independently extracted data from eligible RCTs including details describing study population, interventions, and outcomes. We resolved disagreements about data extraction by discussion and consensus.
2.2.5 Assessment of quality of evidence in included studies.
Two reviewers (ZH Zou and YM Jiang) independently assessed RCT quality and risk of bias using tools provided by the Cochrane Collaboration [14]. The reviewers examined six domains including sequence generation, allocation concealment, double-blind evaluation (blinding), complete outcome data, selective outcome reporting, and baseline comparability of groups. The risk of bias was categorized as low, high, or unclear. RCTs with high risk of bias in at least three of six domains were not included in the meta-analysis. Baseline comparability of groups was assessed using seven matching criteria: age, sex, history of motion sickness, previous post-operative emesis, anesthetic technique, operation type (partial or total thyroidectomy), and duration of surgery. Baseline incomparability was defined as non-matching in at least three of the seven criteria. We resolved disagreements about quality of evidence by discussion and consensus.
2.2.6 Statistical analysis.
Statistical analyses were performed using RevMan (ver. 5.0; The Cochrane Collaboration, Oxford, UK) software and STATA (ver. 11.2; STATA Corporation, College Station, TX, USA) software. Weighted mean differences (WMDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for continuous variables, and risk ratios (RRs) with 95% CIs were calculated for dichotomous variables. A random-effects model was used to pool studies with significant heterogeneity, as determined by the chi-squared test (P≤0.10) and the inconsistency index (I2≥50%). Potential sources of statistical heterogeneity were explored by carrying out subgroup and sensitivity analyses. Subgroup analyses were performed by stratifying patients according to dose of corticosteroid and timing of dexamethasone administration; sensitivity analyses explored the impact of excluding outlying results. The presence of publication bias was comprehensively assessed using Begg’s funnel plot and Begg’s rank correlation test of asymmetry. Publication bias was thought to be present when the continuity-corrected Pr>|z| value was ≤0.1 [15]. The GRADE system was used to summarize the overall quality of evidence [16], [17].
Results
3.1 Trial identification
The searches identified 195 articles. We screened titles and abstracts, and 17 were identified as potentially eligible for inclusion. We retrieved the full text articles. After analyzing the full text articles, 4 studies were excluded and 13 RCTs [18]–[30] were found eligible for inclusion according to our criteria for considering studies in this review (Fig. 1).
On the basis of the search strategy, 195 articles were identified by the initial search, and 17 required further assessment. Finally, 13 articles were included in this review.
3.2 Characteristics of included studies
The characteristics of the included studies are shown in Table 1. The 13 eligible RCTs included 2,180 patients who underwent general anesthesia for thyroidectomy. The majority of RCTs included patients classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class I or II. Exclusion criteria were: pregnant women, patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus, obesity, and patients with a high risk for PONV. Dexamethasone was administered intravenously in a single or combination dose ranging from 1.25–18 mg. Timing of administration varied from 90 minutes before skin incision to the end of surgery. Controls included placebo, droperidol, granisetron, ondansetron, tropisetron or a combination of these medications. Confounders such as anesthetic technique and rescue analgesics and anti-emetics were standardized within studies (Table 2). Risk of bias was low across all RCTs (Table 3).
3.3 Treatment effects
3.3.1 Primary outcome.
Incidence of PONV: Dexamethasone versus placebo, with or without concomitant anti-emetics - Data reporting on the incidence of PONV in thyroidectomy patients treated with dexamethasone versus placebo with or without concomitant anti-emetics are described in 11 RCTs [18]–[25], [28]–[30]. The meta-analysis demonstrated a significant decrease in the incidence of PONV in patients receiving dexamethasone compared to placebo, with or without concomitant anti-emetics (RR 0.52, 95% CI 0.43 to 0.63, P<0.00001; Fig. 2). There was evidence of significant heterogeneity between studies (P = 0.003, I2 = 56%). The dose-response gradient may have caused most of the variation between RCTs (Fig. 3; Fig.S1).
Eleven studies described the incidence of PONV in thyroidectomy patients treated with dexamethasone versus placebo with or without concomitant anti-emetics (RR 0.52, 95% CI 0.43 to 0.63, P<0.00001). There was evidence of significant heterogeneity between studies (P = 0.003, I2 = 56%).
Higher dexamethasone doses (8–10 mg) were significantly more effective than lower dexamethasone doses (1.25–5 mg) (P = 0.02).
Incidence of PONV: Dexamethasone versus a different antiemetic - Data reporting on the incidence of PONV in thyroidectomy patients treated with dexamethasone versus a different anti-emetic, including droperidol, granisetron, or tropisetron, are described in three RCTs [18], [25], [28]. The meta-analysis demonstrated no significant difference in the incidence of PONV in patients receiving dexamethasone compared to these different anti-emetics (RR 1.25, 95% CI 0.86–1.81, P = 0.24; Fig. 4). There was no evidence of significant heterogeneity between RCTs (P = 0.27, I2 = 23%).
Three studies described the incidence of PONV in thyroidectomy patients treated with dexamethasone versus other anti-emetics (RR 1.25, 95% CI 0.86–1.81, P = 0.24). There was no evidence of significant heterogeneity between RCTs (P = 0.27, I2 = 23%).
3.3.2 Secondary outcomes.
Postoperative pain scores and need for rescue analgesia: Dexamethasone versus placebo with or without concomitant anti-emetics - Data reporting on post-operative pain scores in thyroidectomy patients treated with dexamethasone versus placebo with or without concomitant anti-emetics are described in six RCTs [18], [20], [22], [23], [25], [26]. Pain scores were evaluated based on visual analogue scales (VAS) completed by patients 24 h post-operatively. Four RCTs [22], [23], [25], [26] reported data as means ± standard deviations (SDs); two RCTs [18], [20] reported data as medians (range) converted to estimated means and SDs [31]. The meta-analysis demonstrated a significantly lower post-operative VAS score in patients receiving dexamethasone compared to placebo, with or without concomitant anti-emetics (WMD –1.17, 95% CI –1.91 to –0.44, P = 0.002; Fig. 5). There was evidence of significant heterogeneity between RCTs (P<0.00001, I2 = 94%). The doses of dexamethasone may have caused most of the variation between RCTs. The need for rescue analgesia was significantly less frequent in the patients that received dexamethasone (RR 0.65, 95% CI 0.50–0.83, P = 0.0008; Fig. 6); there was no evidence of significant heterogeneity between RCTs (P = 0.25, I2 = 25%).
Six studies described post-operative pain scores in thyroidectomy patients treated with dexamethasone versus placebo with or without concomitant anti-emetics (WMD –1.17, 95% CI –1.91 to –0.44, P = 0.002). There was evidence of significant heterogeneity between RCTs (P<0.00001, I2 = 94%).
Six studies described the need for rescue analgesics in thyroidectomy patients treated with dexamethasone versus placebo with or without concomitant anti-emetics (RR 0.65, 95% CI 0.50–0.83, P = 0.0008). There was no evidence of significant heterogeneity between RCTs (P = 0.25, I2 = 25%).
Need for rescue anti-emetic: Dexamethasone versus placebo with or without concomitant antiemetics - Data reporting on the need for rescue anti-emetics in thyroidectomy patients treated with dexamethasone versus placebo with or without concomitant anti-emetics are described in six studies [19], [25]–[28], [30]. The meta-analysis demonstrated a significant decrease in the need for rescue anti-emetics in patients receiving dexamethasone compared to placebo, with or without concomitant anti-emetics (RR 0.42, 95% CI 0.30 to 0.57, P<0.00001; Fig. 7). There was no evidence of significant heterogeneity between RCTs (P = 0.43, I2 = 0%).
Six studies described the need for rescue antiemetics in thyroidectomy patients treated with dexamethasone versus placebo with or without concomitant antiemetics (RR 0.42, 95% CI 0.30 to 0.57, P<0.00001). There was no evidence of significant heterogeneity between RCTs (P = 0.43, I2 = 0%).
Incidence of adverse events: Dexamethasone versus placebo with or without concomitant anti-emetics - Data reporting on blood glucose levels in thyroidectomy patients treated with dexamethasone are described in two RCTs. A significantly higher level of blood glucose was observed in patients receiving dexamethasone compared to controls during the first 8 hours post-operatively [23], [24]. No statistical differences in symptomatic transient hypocalcemia and asymptomatic transient hypocalcemia were present [23]. One RCT [27] reported that dexamethasone administration prevented recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy; however, this effect was not described elsewhere [23]. There were no significant differences in the incidences of extrapyramidal signs including headache, dizziness, constipation, and muscle pain, and other adverse events such as wound infection and delayed wound healing, in patients receiving dexamethasone compared to controls.
3.4 Subgroup analyses
Incidence of PONV: Dose of dexamethasone.
Subgroup analyses stratified by dose of dexamethasone (range, 1.25 mg to 18 mg) demonstrated that dexamethasone 4–5 mg and 8–10 mg significantly reduced the incidence of PONV compared to controls (1.25–5 mg: RR 0.59, 95% CI 0.44 to 0.79; 8–10 mg: RR 0.45, 95% CI 0.35–0.57), while dexamethasone 18 mg did not (RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.59–1.15) (Fig. 3). Dexamethasone 8–10 mg had a significantly greater effect for reducing the incidence of PONV than dexamethasone 1.25–5 mg (1.25–5 mg RR 0.40, 95% CI 0.28 to 0.55; 8–10 mg: RR 0.23, 95% CI 0.18–0.31; P = 0.02; Fig. S1).
Incidence of PONV: Timing of dexamethasone administration.
The RCTs included in this review varied with regard to timing of dexamethasone administration. Some patients received dexamethasone 90 minutes before skin incision, while others received dexamethasone postoperatively. Wang et al [32] demonstrated that dexamethasone administered before anesthesia was more effective in decreasing early PONV compared to dexamethasone administered after anesthesia. These observations are in accordance with data showing that the onset time of dexamethasone on anti-emesis is approximately 2 hours. In the current study, subgroup analysis stratified by the timing of dexamethasone administration showed that dexamethasone was most effective in preventing PONV when administered before rather than after induction of anesthesia (P = 0.0002; Fig. S2).
3.5 Sensitivity analysis
To explore the effects of individual RCTs on the pooled OR estimates, we performed a sensitivity analysis omitting one study at a time. No single RCT significantly affected the overall results of the meta-analysis.
3.6 Publication bias
Visual inspection of a Funnel plot, Egger's test, and Begg's rank correlation test revealed no significant publication bias (Begg’s rank correlation test, continuity-corrected Pr>|z| >0.1), except for RCTs reporting on the need for rescue anti-emetic in patients receiving dexamethasone versus placebo, with or without concomitant antiemetics (Pr>|z| = 0.06), (Table S2).
3.7 Quality of evidence
Quality of available evidence from RCTs, which was downgraded by inconsistency (heterogeneity between studies), indirectness (variations in study setting), or publication bias, and upgraded by dose-response gradient, varied from moderate to high (Table 4).
Discussion
PONV is a common and distressing complication for patients undergoing thyroidectomy; therefore, prophylactic anti-emetics may be beneficial. An optimal anti-emetic regimen should be capable of decreasing the incidence of PONV without increasing the risk for adverse events. However, most of the currently used anti-emetics, including anti-histamines, butyrophenones, and dopamine receptor antagonists cause occasional undesirable adverse events, such as excessive sedation, hypotension, dry mouth, dysphoria, hallucinations, and extrapyramidal signs [33]. 5-HT3 antagonists are effective for preventing and treating PONV in patients undergoing various types of surgery [34]. However, the use of prophylactic anti-emetic therapy with 5-HT3 antagonists has been criticized for being too expensive [35].
Our meta-analysis of 13 RCTs demonstrated that prophylactic dexamethasone is effective in reducing the incidence of PONV, post-operative pain scores, and the need for rescue analgesia and anti-emetics compared to placebo administered with or without contaminant anti-emetics in patients undergoing thyroidectomy. In addition, our findings showed that dexamethasone is as effective as other anti-emetics for reducing PONV in this patient population. However, the benefits of administering dexamethasone as a more cost-effective anti-emetic and efficacious analgesic drug35 should be weighed against the potential side effects. Our study indicated that dexamethasone administration is associated with an increase in blood glucose during the immediate post-operative period, but with no other serious adverse events.
For optimal dose and timing of dexamethasone administration, subgroup analyses showed that higher doses of dexamethasone (8–10 mg) are more effective than lower doses (1.5–5 mg), and dexamethasone is most effective in preventing PONV when administered before rather than after induction of anesthesia.
In terms of populations eligible for treatment, the RCTs in the current study mostly included healthy patients, and excluded pregnant women, patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus, those who were obese, and patients with a high risk for PONV. As such, the impact of prophylactic dexamethasone on outcomes in high-risk patients is not known. A larger sample size and well-performed RCTs including high risk patients are required for further investigations.
This review has several limitations. First, data reporting on the effects of prophylactic dexamethasone on post-operative pain scores and need for rescue analgesics in thyroidectomy patients were limited by substantial heterogeneity and publication bias, respectively. Second, the studies in this systematic review included patients across various age groups receiving dexamethasone according to very different protocols.
Conclusion
The present meta-analysis shows that prophylactic dexamethasone is safe and effective for reducing the incidence of PONV, post-operative pain, and the need for rescue analgesia and anti-emetics in thyroidectomy patients. Prophylactic dexamethasone 8–10 mg administered before induction of anesthesia should be recommended for patients undergoing thyroidectomy except for those that are pregnant, have diabetes mellitus, hyperglycaemia or contraindications for corticosteroids. More high quality trials are warranted to define the benefits and risks of prophylactic dexamethasone in potential patients with high risk for PONV.
Supporting Information
Figure S1.
Incidence of PONV stratified according to dexamethasone dose: 8–10 mg and 1.25–5 mg.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0109582.s001
(TIF)
Figure S2.
Incidence of PONV stratified by timing of dexamethasone administration.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0109582.s002
(TIF)
Table S1.
Search strategy from its inception to October 1, 2013.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0109582.s003
(DOC)
Table S2.
Begg’s rank correlation test for publication bias.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0109582.s004
(DOC)
Author Contributions
Conceived and designed the experiments: RZ ZZ MX. Performed the experiments: ZZ YJ. Analyzed the data: ZZ YJ. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: ZZ YJ. Contributed to the writing of the manuscript: RZ MX.
References
- 1. Sonner JM, Hynson JM, Clark O, Katz JA (1997) Nausea and vomiting following thyroid and parathyroid surgery. J Clin Anesth 9(5): 398–402.
- 2. Kranke P, Eberhart LH (2011) Possibilities and limitations in the pharmacological management of postoperative nausea and vomiting. Eur J Anaesthesiol 28: 758–765.
- 3. Matory YL, Spiro RH (1993) Wound bleeding after head and neck surgery. J Surg Oncol 53(1): 17–19.
- 4. Schwartz AE, Clark OH, Ituarte P, Lo Gerfo P (1998) Therapeutic controversy: thyroid surgery–the choice. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 83(4): 1097–1105.
- 5. Fredrikson M, Hursti T, Fürst CJ, Steineck G, Börjeson S, et al. (1992) Nausea in cancer chemotherapy is inversely related to urinary cortisol excretion. Br J Cancer 65: 779–780.
- 6. Aapro MS, Plezia PM, Alberts DS, Graham V, Jones SE, et al. (1984) Double-blind crossover study of the antiemetic efficacy of high-dose dexamethasone versus high-dose metoclopramide. J Clin Oncol 2: 466–471.
- 7. Sapolsky RM, Romero LM, Munck AU (2000) How do glucocorticoids influence stress responses? Integrating permissive, suppressive, stimulatory, and preparative actions. Endocr Rev 21: 55–89.
- 8. Hargreaves KM, Costello A (1990) Glucocorticoids suppress levels of immunoreactive bradykinin in inflamed tissue as evaluated by microdialysis probes. Clin Pharmacol Ther 48: 168–178.
- 9. Hong D, Byers MR, Oswald RJ (1993) Dexamethasone treatment reduces sensory neuropeptides and nerve sprouting reactions in injured teeth. Pain 55: 171–181.
- 10. Karanicolas PJ1, Smith SE, Kanbur B, Davies E, Guyatt GH (2008) The Impact of Prophylactic Dexamethasone on Nausea and Vomiting After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Ann Surg 248(5): 751–762.
- 11. Chen CC, Siddiqui FJ, Chen TL, Chan ES, Tam KW (2012) Dexamethasone for prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting in patients undergoing thyroidectomy: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. World J Surg 36: 61–68.
- 12. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG (2010) PRISMA Group (2010) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Int J Surg 8: 336–341.
- 13.
Lefebvre C, Manheimer E, Glanville J (2011) Chapter 6: searching for studies. In: Higgins JPT, Green S (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available: www.cochrane-handbook.org.
- 14.
Higgins JPT, Altman DG, Sterne JAC (2011) Chapter 8: assessing risk of bias in included studies. In: Higgins JPT, Green S (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available: www.cochrane-handbook.org.
- 15. Begg CB, Mazumdar M (1994) Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias. Biometrics 50(4): 1088–1101.
- 16. Atkins D, Best D, Briss PA, Eccles M, Falck-Ytter Y, et al. (2004) GRADE Working Group (2004) Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ 328: 1490–1494.
- 17. Guyatt G, Gutterman D, Baumann MH, Addrizzo-Harris D, Hylek EM, et al. (2006) Grading strength of recommendations and quality of evidence in clinical guidelines. Chest 129: 174–181.
- 18. Wang JJ, Ho ST, Lee SC, Liu YC, Liu YH, et al. (1999) The prophylactic effect of dexamethasone on postoperative nausea and vomiting in women undergoing thyroidectomy: a comparison of droperidol with saline. Anesth Analg 89: 200–203.
- 19. Wang JJ, Ho ST, Lee SC, Liu YC, Ho CM (2000) The use of dexamethasone for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting in females undergoing thyroidectomy: a dose-ranging study. Anesth Analg 91: 1404–1407.
- 20. Lee Y, Lin PC, Lai HY, Huang SJ, Lin YS, et al. (2001) Prevention of PONV with dexamethasone in female patients undergoing desflurane anesthesia for thyroidectomy. Acta Anaesthesiol Sin 39: 151–156.
- 21. Fujii Y, Nakayama M (2007) Efficacy of dexamethasone for reducing postoperative nausea and vomiting and analgesic requirements after thyroidectomy. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 136: 274–277.
- 22. Worni M, Schudel HH, Seifert E, Inglin R, Hagemann M, et al. (2008) Randomized controlled trial on single dose steroid before thyroidectomy for benign disease to improve postoperative nausea, pain, and vocal function. Ann Surg 248: 1060–1066.
- 23. Feroci F, Rettori M, Borrelli A, Lenzi E, Ottaviano A, et al. (2011) Dexamethasone prophylaxis before thyroidectomy to reduce postoperative nausea, pain, and vocal dysfunction: a randomized clinical controlled trial. Head Neck 2011 33: 840–846.
- 24. Doksrød S, Sagen Ø, Nøstdahl T, Ræder J (2012) Dexamethasone does not reduce pain or analgesic consumption after thyroid surgery; a prospective, randomized trial. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 56: 513–519.
- 25. Song YK, Lee C (2013) Effects of ramosetron and dexamethasone on postoperative nausea, vomiting, pain, and shivering in female patients undergoing thyroid surgery. J Anesth 27: 29–34.
- 26. Barros A, Vale CP, Oliveira FC, Ventura C, Assunção J, et al. (2013) Dexamethasone effect on postoperative pain and tramadol requirement after thyroidectomy. Pharmacology 91: 153–157.
- 27. Schietroma M, Cecilia EM, Carlei F, Sista F, De Santis G, et al. (2013) Dexamethasone for the prevention of recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy and other complications after thyroid surgery: a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 139: 471–478.
- 28. Zhou H, Xu H, Zhang J, Wang W, Wang Y, et al. (2012) Combination of dexamethasone and tropisetron before thyroidectomy to alleviate postoperative nausea, vomiting, and pain: randomized controlled trial. World J Surg 36: 1217–1224.
- 29. Bononi M, Amore Bonapasta S, Vari A, Scarpini M, De Cesare A, et al. (2010) Incidence and circumstances of cervical hematoma complicating thyroidectomy and its relationship to postoperative vomiting. Head Neck 32: 1173–1177.
- 30. Fujii Y, Tanaka H, Kobayashi N (2000) Granisetron/dexamethasone combination for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting after thyroidectomy. Anaesth Intensive Care 28: 266–269.
- 31. Hozo SP, Djulbegovic B, Hozo I (2005) Estimating the mean and variance from the median, range, and the size of a sample. BMC Med Res Methodol 5: 13.
- 32. Wang JJ, Ho ST, Tzeng JI, Tang CS (2000) The effect of timing of dexamethasone administration on its efficacy as a prophylactic antiemetic for postoperative nausea and vomiting. Anesth Analg 91(1): 136–9.
- 33. Watcha MF, White PF (1992) Postoperative nausea and vomiting: its etiology, treatment, and prevention. Anesthesiology 77: 162–84.
- 34. Kovac AL (2000) Prevention and treatment of postoperative nausea and vomiting. Drugs 59: 213–43.
- 35. White PF, Watcha MF (1993) Are new drugs cost-effective for patients undergoing ambulatory surgery? Anesthesiology 78(1): 2–5.