Figures
Abstract
Cytogenetically normal acute myeloid leukemia (CN-AML) is the largest and most heterogeneous AML subgroup. It lacks sensitive and specific biomarkers. Emerging evidences have suggested that microRNAs are involved in the pathogenesis of various leukemias. This paper evaluated the association between microRNA expression and prognostic outcome for CN-AML, based on the RNA/microRNA sequencing data of CN-AML patients. High let-7a-2-3p expression and low miR-188-5p expression were identified to be significantly associated with longer overall survival (OS) and event free survival (EFS) for CN-AML, independently or in a combined way. Their prognostic values were further confirmed in European Leukemia Net (ELN) genetic categories. Also, in multivariable analysis with other known risk factors, high let-7a-2-3p and low miR-188-5p expression remained to be associated with longer OS and EFS. In addition, the prognostic value of these two microRNAs was confirmed in patients who received hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). To gain more biological insights of the underlying mechanisms, we derived the genome-wide differential gene/microRNA signatures associated with the expression of let-7a-2-3p and miR-188-5p. Several common microRNA signatures indicating favorable outcome in previous studies were up-regulated in both high let-7a-2-3p expressers and low miR-188-5p expressers, including miR-135a, miR-335 and miR-125b and all members of miR-181 family. Additionally, common up-regulated genes included FOSB, IGJ, SNORD50A and ZNF502, and FOSB was a known favorable signature in AML. These common signatures further confirmed the underlying common mechanisms for these two microRNAs value as favorable prognostic biomarkers. We concluded that high let-7a-2-3p and low miR-188-5p expression could be potentially used as favorably prognostic biomarkers independently or in a combined way in CN-AML patients, whether they received HSCT or not.
Citation: Jinlong S, Lin F, Yonghui L, Li Y, Weidong W (2015) Identification of let-7a-2-3p or/and miR-188-5p as Prognostic Biomarkers in Cytogenetically Normal Acute Myeloid Leukemia. PLoS ONE 10(2): e0118099. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0118099
Academic Editor: Ken Mills, Queen’s University Belfast, UNITED KINGDOM
Received: October 2, 2014; Accepted: January 5, 2015; Published: February 3, 2015
Copyright: © 2015 Jinlong et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited
Data Availability: All data is available from TCGA data portal. (https://tcga-data.nci.nih.gov/docs/publications/laml_2012/)
Funding: The work was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (61372047) and the National High-tech R&D Program of China (2013BAI03B04). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Introduction
Cytogenetically-normal acute myeloid leukemia (CN-AML) accounts for almost half of patients with AML[1]. Such patients usually fall into intermediate-risk cytogenetics, but show obviously heterogeneous prognosis clinically. Mutations and gene expression signatures have been used to distinguish and identify different prognostic subgroups[2,3]. Mutations of NPM1[4] and CEBPA[5] are associated with favorable outcome, whereas mutations of FLT3-ITD[6] and WT1[7] supply indication for adverse prognosis. Also, low expression of BAALC and ERG[8], high expression of LEF1[9] have shown to be favorable prognostic factors. Because of the sizeable proportion of patients that failed to existing therapies and high relapse rate, identification of new diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers is valuable for finding novel targets and developing novel therapies.
MicroRNA is a large family of highly conserved noncoding genes with a short single strand of 19 to 25 nucleotides in length, which are directly involved in many critical processes, including cell differentiation, apoptosis, proliferations and hematopoiesis [10–12]. Emerging data shows that many types of solid tumors and leukemias are accompanied with the dysregulation of microRNAs [13,14]. For their direct and indirect involvement in hematopoiesis, recently, more and more function studies and prognostic analysis were performed on various leukemias. A cluster of two miRNAs, miR-15a and miR-16–1, were firstly linked to be involved in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL)[15]. The diagnostic and therapeutic impact about microRNAs was discussed in leukemias[16,17]. However, studies testing the prognostic impact of let-7a-2–3p and miR-188–5p expression have not been reported in CN-AML.
This paper tries to determine the prognostic impact of the expression of let-7a-2–3p and miR-188–5p in CN-AML patients. For the first time, it presented that high expression of let-7a-2–3p and low expression of miR-188 were significantly associated with better outcome, independently or in a combined way, for CN-AML patients whether they received hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) or not. Their prognostic values were further confirmed in European Leukemia Net (ELN) genetic categories and multivariable analysis adjusting other known risk factors. To further explore the underlying biological mechanisms of why high let-7a-2–3p and low miR-188 expression were associated with improved outcome, genome-wide sequencing data of gene and microRNA was analyzed to reveal the aberrant changes of expression pattern. Differentially expressed genes/microRNAs were identified, according to the high and low expression of these two microRNAs. Interestingly, many genes/microRNAs were identified to be commonly up/down-regulated associated with high expression of let-7a-2–3p and low expression of miR-188–5p, including several known favorable prognostic biomarkers, which validated the potential value of these two microRNAs in outcome prediction. In conclusion, these findings may potentially be used in clinical application and inspire new strategies for diagnosis and therapy for CN-AML patients.
Methods
Patients and expression profiles of gene and microRNA
TCGA provided 200 clinically annotated adult de novo AML samples, and performed RNA sequencing for 179 samples and microRNA sequencing for 194 samples as previously reported[18]. In all these cases, sample numbers of CN-AML was 79 with microRNA sequencing and 74 with RNA sequencing, respectively. These sequencing data provided exact measure for expression levels. Also, detailed descriptions were provided for clinical and molecular characteristics. All these data can be publicly downloaded from the TCGA website, providing a consolidated support for statistical analysis. Written informed consent was obtained from all patients, which was approved by the human studies committee at Washington University[18].
Statistical analysis
The main objective of the study was to evaluate the prognostic value of let-7a-2–3p and miR-188–5p expression in CN-AML. Firstly, median values of let-7a-2–3p and miR-188–5p expression were used to divide all patients into two groups, separately. Then, Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the association between microRNA expression levels and overall survival (OS) and event free survival (EFS), which were further validated with log-rank test. Definition of these clinical endpoints (OS, EFS) was described in [18].
To further investigate the association between microRNA expression levels and clinical, molecular features, the Fisher exact and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests were used to check the hypothesis testing for categorical and continuous variables, respectively. In addition, multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were used to study how these two microRNAs’ expression levels were associated with OS and EFS accompanying with other known risk factors. According to the two groups divided by microRNA expression levels, Student’s t-test was used to identify differentially expressed genes/microRNAs, the derived p values were corrected with multiple hypothesis of BH test (Benjamini& Hochberg). The statistic cutoffs were confirmed as absolute fold-change (FC) > 1.5 and the adjusted P-value < 0.05.
All analyses were performed on the platform of R 3.0.2 software package.
Results
Clinical and molecular characteristics associated with let-7a-2–3p and miR-188–5p expression
Most clinical and molecular features show no significant difference associated with different expression status of let-7a-2–3p and miR-188–5p. But it can be seen that high expression of let-7a-2–3p was associated with mutation of CEBPA (P = 0.03, Table 1), which can be seen as a biomarker for favorable prognosis in CN-AML [19]. This trend of association can also be seen in low miR-188–5p expressers (P = 0.057, Table 1).
Prognostic impact of let-7a-2–3p and miR-188–5p expression
Using median expression as the cutoff, patients were divided into high and low expression groups. High let-7a-2–3p expressers had a longer OS (P = 0.009, Fig. 1A) and EFS (P = 0.026, Fig. 1B) than low ones, while low expression of miR-188–5p showed a significant association with longer OS (P = 0.005, Fig. 1C) and EFS (P = 0.018, Fig. 1D) than high expression. In addition, mean OS, EFS and relapsing time associated with high or low expression groups of let-7a-2–3p and miR-188–5p were compared separately, results showed there did exist significant difference between high and low expression of these two microRNAs, respectively. (For let-7a-2–3p, OS: P = 0.0045, EFS: P = 0.016, relapsing days: P = 0.029. For miR-188–5p, OS: P = 0.012, EFS: P = 0.027, relapsing days: P = 0.047, Table 2).
To further explore the prognostic impact of these two microRNAs, we investigated the combination of them. Firstly, patients with both higher expression of let-7a-2–3p and lower expression of miR-188–5p were compared with others to show the power of the combination of the 2 signatures for favorable prognosis. The combination of 2 expression signatures showed a significant longer OS (P = 0.006, Fig. 2A), EFS (P = 0.019, Fig. 2B) and relapsing days (P = 0.006, Table 2) than that of low let-7a-2–3p expressers and/or high miR-188–5p expressers. Secondly, the power for unfavorable prognosis was shown with the combination of low expression of let-7a-2–3p and high expression of miR-188–5p. The patient bearing the combining signatures showed a trend toward shorter OS (P = 0.022, Fig. 2C) and EFS (P = 0.07, Fig. 2D) than other patients.
According to the mutations of CEBPA, NPM1 and FLT3-ITD, European Leukemia Net (ELN) divided CN-AML patients into ELN Favorable or ELN Intermediate-I genetic categories. 50 of 79 samples used in this paper fell into the ELN Intermediate-I group. Based on these 50 samples, the prognostic impact of these two microRNAs was explored in molecular subsets of CN-AML, which were shown in Fig. 3. Higher let-7a-2–3p expressers had a longer OS (P = 0.026, Fig. 3A) and EFS (P = 0.038, Fig. 3B) than lower ones, while lower miR-188–5p expressers showed a longer OS (P = 0.041, Fig. 3C) and a trend for longer EFS (P = 0.12, Fig. 3D) than higher ones. These results further validated the prognostic values of these two microRNAs.
In addition, multivariable analysis was performed to determine the prognostic significance of let-7a-2–3p and miR-188–5p, accompanying other known risk factors. In the multiple model for OS, high let-7a-2–3p expressers had a 54% lower risk of death (P = 0.008), and low miR-188–5p expressers showed a 49% lower risk of death (P = 0.02). The only other factors associated with longer OS were younger age and FLT3-ITD-negative genotype. In the multiple model of EFS, high let-7a-2–3p expressers had a 52% lower risk of death (P = 0.01), and low miR-188–5p expressers showed a 43% lower risk of death (P = 0.06). The only other factor associated with longer EFS was younger age and FLT3-ITD negative genotype (See Table 3).
Prognostic impact of let-7a-2–3p and miR-188–5p in patients with/without hematopoietic stem cell transplantation
Given that the patient cohort included a certain number of patients who had received HSCT, the prognostic impact of these two microRNAs should be further clarified. Patients were divided into two groups, one contained 37 patients with HSCT (6 auto, 31 allo), while the other contained 42 patients without HSCT. Both groups were further partitioned as high/low let-7a-2–3p or miR-188–5p expressers, separately. The distribution of patients with HSCT showed no specificity according to these two microRNAs (See S1 Table). However, OS and EFS showed a significantly difference in all divisions of high/low expression. For patients with HSCT, high let-7a-2–3p expressers showed a longer OS (P = 0.049, Fig. 4A) and a trend for longer EFS (P = 0.07, Fig. 4B), low miR-188–5p expression was associated with a longer OS (P = 0.045, Fig. 4C) and EFS (P = 0.056, Fig. 4D). The combination of high let-7a-2–3p and low miR-188–5p showed a significantly longer OS (P = 0.014, Fig. 4E) and EFS (P = 0.049, Fig. 4F). The prognostic value of these two microRNAs was also further confirmed in patients without HSCT (See S2 Fig., S1 Table). It seemed that high expression of let-7a-2–3p and low expression of miR-188–5p could be used as favorable prognostic biomarkers for CN-AML patients whether they received HSCT or not, independently or in a combined way.
Gene and microRNA signatures associated with expression levels of let-7a-2–3p
To investigate the underlying biological mechanisms that induce improved outcome for high expression of let-7a-2–3p, we divided the CN-AML patients into different groups according to the median value of let-7a-2–3p expression, and implemented the differential expression analysis for genes and microRNAs on the genome-wide scale.
Comparison between high and low let-7a-2–3p expressers revealed 172 aberrant genes, including 74 up-regulated and 98 down-regulated, as shown in S3 Fig. Higher expression of FOSB and HIST1H4C was accompanied with high let-7a-2–3p expression. The former was previously reported to be sensitive to histone deacetylase inhibitors and associated with favorable outcome in AML [20]. The latter was a known regulator in NOTCH1-mediated NF-KB activity regulation, and closely associated with histone modification [21]. Up-regulation of RASAL2 was also observed, which was recently reported as a tumor and metastasis suppressor [22]. Other up-regulated genes included several members of zinc finger family and small nucleolar family. Furthermore, down-regulated genes associated with high let-7a-2–3p expression included known oncogene JDP2 [23], and several genes in the family of leukocyte immunoglobulin-like receptor (LILRA5/6, LILRB2/3), which might contribute to the adverse prognosis of CN-AML. The full list of differentially expressed genes can be found in supplementary materials (S2 Table).
Here, for the first time, we reported the microRNA expression signatures associated with let-7a-2–3p expression levels in CN-AML. 30 microRNAs were observed to be differentially expressed, including 22 up-regulated and 8 down-regulated signatures, as shown in S4 Fig. Let-7a-2–3p was among the most up-regulated microRNAs in high let-7a-2–3p expressers. miR-100, which induced cell differentiation and better outcome by targeting RBSP3 in AML [24], was also up-regulated. Others included all members of miR-181 family, miR-125a/b, miR-335, which were all previously reported to be associated with higher complete remission (CR) rate and longer OS/EFS in CN-AML[25–27]. One of the 8 down-regulated microRNAs was miR-106a, which was a known oncogenic signature in human T-cell leukemia [28]. The full list of these aberrant microRNAs was shown in supplementary materials (S3 Table).
Gene and microRNA signatures associated with expression levels of miR-188–5p. To gain further biological insights associated with favorable prognosis induced by low miR-188–5p expression, we derived the first gene and microRNA expression signatures associated with miR-188–5p expression levels. 34 differentially expressed genes were identified, including 26 up-regulated and 8 down-regulated genes in low miR-188–5p expressers, as shown in S5 Fig. One of the most up-regulated genes was FOSB, which has shown to be associated with favorable outcome in high let-7a-2–3p expressers. Other up-regulated genes included several members of small nucleolar family (SNORD50A, SNORD105, SNORD11B) and zinc finger protein family (ZNF502, ZNF662), which were similar as that in high let-7a-2–3p expressers. The full list of differential genes can be found in supplementary materials (S4 Table).
The first microRNA expression signatures associated with miR-188 expression levels were represented in our study. 77 differentially expressed microRNAs were identified comprising of 18 up-regulated and 59 down-regulated microRNAs in low miR-188 expressers, as shown in S6 Fig. The most up-regulated microRNA was miR-135a, which was recently proved to be a tumor suppressor in epithelial ovarian and regulate HOXA 10 expression [29]. It was also previously report to regulate JAK2 and promote a favorable outcome in classic Hodgkin lymphoma [30]. Other up-regulated microRNAs included miR-335, functioning as a tumor suppressor in pancreatic cancer by targeting OCT4[31]; miR-133a/b, recently reported to inhibit proliferation, migration, invasion and cell cycle by targeting transcription factor SP1 in gastric cancer[32]; all members of miR-181 family, just like in high let-7a-2–3p expressers. Notably, one of the down-regulated microRNAs represented in low miR-188–5p expressers was miR-22, an unfavorable factor targeting TET2 in myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and leukemia [33]. The full list of differential microRNAs can be found in supplementary materials (S5 Table).
Common genes/microRNAs associated with expression of high let-7a-2–3p and low miR-188–5p
Previous results showed that high expression of let-7a-2–3p and low expression of miR188–5p were associated with better prognostic outcome. To further distinctly show their commonly underlying genome-wide expression features, we overlapped the differential genes/microRNAs according to high and low expression of these two microRNAs (See Table 4). Four common genes were found, which were all up-regulated in both high let-7a-2–3p and low miR-188 expressers. 17 shared microRNAs were found, including 10 commonly up-regulated and 7 commonly down-regulated according to high expression of let-7a-2–3p and low expression of miR-188–5p. In these common signatures, several have been proved to be associated with better outcome in AML, such as FOSB, miR-335, miR-181 family members etc. These results further illustrated the possibility of combining let-7a-2–3p and miR-188–5p as prognostic biomarkers for CN-AML patients. Also, other unknown common signatures may aid to reveal the pathogenesis and identify new targets for CN-AML in further studies.
Discussion
Many studies have shown that aberrant expression of microRNA is closely associated with the leukemogenesis, diagnosis and prognosis of AML[34,35]. Several microRNA signatures have been identified to be oncogenetic factors or tumor suppressors, and provide valuable indication for predicting clinical outcome, such as miR-9[36], miR-29b [37]. This paper presents a new endeavor to elucidate the prognostic impact of let-7a-2–3p and miR-188–5p expression in CN-AML.
First, the paper showed higher expression of let-7a-2–3p and lower expression of miR-188–5p were significantly associated with longer OS and EFS in CN-AML patients. Also, their prognostic value was confirmed in ELN genetic categories and validated in multivariable analysis with other known risk factors. Further analysis indicated that these two signatures could be potentially used as favorable prognostic biomarkers for CN-AML patients, whether they received HSCT or not, in an independent or combined way. Thus, these two microRNAs can be used not only as prognostic biomarkers to evaluate the treatment effect, but also potentially as an indicator to direct the choice of therapeutic strategy for transplants in CN-AML.
Based on our searching of existing reports, there were only several papers focusing on the biological and clinical roles of these two microRNAs in various types of tumor research. Only one paper discussed the prognostic impact of let-7a-2, and showed that low expression of let-7a-2 was correlated with poor survivals in lung cancer [38]. On the other hand, there was one paper revealing the potential involvement of miR-188 in human ovarian cell proliferation and apoptosis [39]. To our limited knowledge, this paper was the first one to evaluate the prognostic impact of let-7a-2–3p and miR-188–5p in CN-AML.
Second, based on the genome-wide analysis of gene/microRNA expression profiles, we found many known disease factors were differentially expressed accompanying with the aberrant expression of let-7a-2–3p and miR-188–5p. These genes/microRNAs involved in many important genetic and epigenetic processes, such as cell proliferation, differentiation, immune response, methylation and acetylation, which can potentially reveal the underlying mechanisms why let-7a-2–3p and miR-188 functioned. In addition, pathway data from MSigDB [40] was used to show the expression alternation associated with microRNA expression levels. In high let-7a-2–3p expressers, several known pathways that indicate unfavorable outcome were significantly down-regulated (S6 Table), including ERBB Signaling pathway [41] (P = 0.02, Fig. 5A), JAK-STAT Signaling pathway [42] (P = 0.016, Fig. 5B).
Interestingly, some common microRNAs previously verified to be associated with better outcome were up-regulated in both high let-7a-2–3p expressers and low miR-188–5p expressers, including miR-335, miR-125b, miR-135a and all members of miR-181 family. Common up-regulated gene signatures included FOSB, members of zinc finger family and small nucleolar family in both high let-7a-2–3p expressers and low miR-188–5p expressers. FOSB has been verified to be a cofactor for JUN family to regulate proliferation and differentiation. The zinc finger family and small nucleolar family may be new disease factors for CN-AML. These findings indicated the possibly common function mechanisms for let-7a-2–3p and miR-188, and provided more support for the combined use for these two signatures in prognostic evaluation for CN-AML patients.
In conclusion, the paper identified high expression of let-7a-2–3p and low expression of miR-188–5p as two potential prognostic biomarkers for improved outcome in CN-AML patients whether they received HSCT or not. The relatively high accuracy of high-throughput sequencing data provided strong support for these discoveries. Limited by the relatively small sample number, more rigorous checkout should be carried out before their application in risk-stratification of CN-AML patients. These results presented valuable exploration about the function and clinical aid of let-7a-2–3p and miR-188–5p. Their prognostic value and associated aberrant expressed genes/microRNAs can improve the understanding of the internal mechanisms of leukemogesis and prompt the designing of new therapy strategies for CN-AML patients.
Supporting Information
S1 Fig. Flowchart for the selection of let-7a-2–3p and miR-188–5p.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0118099.s001
(EPS)
S2 Fig. Comparison of OS and EFS according to the expression of let-7a-2–3p and miR-188–5p in patients without HSCT.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0118099.s002
(EPS)
S3 Fig. Heatmap of differential genes associated with the expression of let-7a-2–3p.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0118099.s003
(EPS)
S4 Fig. Heatmap of differential microRNAs associated with the expression of let-7a-2–3p.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0118099.s004
(EPS)
S5 Fig. Heatmap of differential genes associated with the expression of mir-188–5p.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0118099.s005
(EPS)
S6 Fig. Heatmap of differential microRNAs associated with the expression of mir-188–5p.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0118099.s006
(EPS)
S7 Fig. Barplot of miR-135a expression according to miR-188.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0118099.s007
(EPS)
S8 Fig. Boxplot of let-7a and miR-188 expression in different cytogenetic groups.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0118099.s008
(EPS)
S9 Fig. Comparison of OS and EFS according to expression of let-7a-2–3p and miR-188–5p in other cytogenetic groups.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0118099.s009
(EPS)
S1 Table. Treatment response according to let-7a-2–3p and miR-188–5p expression for patients with/without HSCT.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0118099.s010
(DOC)
S2 Table. Differentially expressed genes according to high let-7a-2–3p expression.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0118099.s011
(DOC)
S3 Table. Differentially expressed microRNAs according to high let-7a-2–3p expression.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0118099.s012
(DOC)
S4 Table. Differentially expressed genes according to low mir-188–5p expression.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0118099.s013
(DOC)
S5 Table. Differentially expressed microRNAs according to low mir-188–5p expression.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0118099.s014
(DOC)
S6 Table. Pathways associated with let-7a-2–3p expression levels.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0118099.s015
(DOC)
Author Contributions
Conceived and designed the experiments: SJL WWD FL YL. Performed the experiments: SJL FL. Analyzed the data: SJL FL LYH. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: SJL FL. Wrote the paper: SJL FL LYH.
References
- 1. Burnett AK (2002) Current controversies: which patients with acute myeloid leukaemia should receive a bone marrow transplantation?—an adult treater’s view. Br J Haematol 118: 357–364. pmid:12139719
- 2. Mrozek K, Marcucci G, Paschka P, Whitman SP, Bloomfield CD (2007) Clinical relevance of mutations and gene-expression changes in adult acute myeloid leukemia with normal cytogenetics: are we ready for a prognostically prioritized molecular classification? Blood 109: 431–448. pmid:16960150
- 3. Valk PJ, Verhaak RG, Beijen MA, Erpelinck CA, Barjesteh van Waalwijk van Doorn-Khosrovani S, et al. (2004) Prognostically useful gene-expression profiles in acute myeloid leukemia. N Engl J Med 350: 1617–1628. pmid:15084694
- 4. Falini B, Mecucci C, Tiacci E, Alcalay M, Rosati R, et al. (2005) Cytoplasmic nucleophosmin in acute myelogenous leukemia with a normal karyotype. N Engl J Med 352: 254–266. pmid:15659725
- 5. Frohling S, Schlenk RF, Stolze I, Bihlmayr J, Benner A, et al. (2004) CEBPA mutations in younger adults with acute myeloid leukemia and normal cytogenetics: prognostic relevance and analysis of cooperating mutations. J Clin Oncol 22: 624–633. pmid:14726504
- 6. Kiyoi H, Naoe T, Nakano Y, Yokota S, Minami S, et al. (1999) Prognostic implication of FLT3 and N-RAS gene mutations in acute myeloid leukemia. Blood 93: 3074–3080. pmid:10216104
- 7. Becker H, Marcucci G, Maharry K, Radmacher MD, Mrozek K, et al. (2010) Mutations of the Wilms tumor 1 gene (WT1) in older patients with primary cytogenetically normal acute myeloid leukemia: a Cancer and Leukemia Group B study. Blood 116: 788–792. pmid:20442368
- 8. Schwind S, Marcucci G, Maharry K, Radmacher MD, Mrozek K, et al. (2010) BAALC and ERG expression levels are associated with outcome and distinct gene and microRNA expression profiles in older patients with de novo cytogenetically normal acute myeloid leukemia: a Cancer and Leukemia Group B study. Blood 116: 5660–5669. pmid:20841507
- 9. Metzeler KH, Heilmeier B, Edmaier KE, Rawat VP, Dufour A, et al. (2012) High expression of lymphoid enhancer-binding factor-1 (LEF1) is a novel favorable prognostic factor in cytogenetically normal acute myeloid leukemia. Blood 120: 2118–2126. pmid:22815426
- 10. Bartel DP (2004) MicroRNAs: genomics, biogenesis, mechanism, and function. Cell 116: 281–297. pmid:14744438
- 11. Alemdehy MF, Erkeland SJ (2012) MicroRNAs: key players of normal and malignant myelopoiesis. Curr Opin Hematol 19: 261–267. pmid:22504525
- 12. Vasilatou D, Papageorgiou S, Pappa V, Papageorgiou E, Dervenoulas J (2010) The role of microRNAs in normal and malignant hematopoiesis. Eur J Haematol 84: 1–16. pmid:19744129
- 13. Lu J, Getz G, Miska EA, Alvarez-Saavedra E, Lamb J, et al. (2005) MicroRNA expression profiles classify human cancers. Nature 435: 834–838. pmid:15944708
- 14. Calin GA, Sevignani C, Dumitru CD, Hyslop T, Noch E, et al. (2004) Human microRNA genes are frequently located at fragile sites and genomic regions involved in cancers. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101: 2999–3004. pmid:14973191
- 15. Calin GA, Dumitru CD, Shimizu M, Bichi R, Zupo S, et al. (2002) Frequent deletions and down-regulation of micro- RNA genes miR15 and miR16 at 13q14 in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99: 15524–15529. pmid:12434020
- 16. Mian YA, Zeleznik-Le NJ (2010) MicroRNAs in leukemias: emerging diagnostic tools and therapeutic targets. Curr Drug Targets 11: 801–811. pmid:20370647
- 17. Schotte D, Pieters R, Den Boer ML (2012) MicroRNAs in acute leukemia: from biological players to clinical contributors. Leukemia 26: 1–12. pmid:21701489
- 18. Cancer Genome Atlas Research N (2013) Genomic and epigenomic landscapes of adult de novo acute myeloid leukemia. N Engl J Med 368: 2059–2074. pmid:23634996
- 19. Preudhomme C, Sagot C, Boissel N, Cayuela JM, Tigaud I, et al. (2002) Favorable prognostic significance of CEBPA mutations in patients with de novo acute myeloid leukemia: a study from the Acute Leukemia French Association (ALFA). Blood 100: 2717–2723. pmid:12351377
- 20. Khanim FL, Bradbury CA, Arrazi J, Hayden RE, Rye A, et al. (2009) Elevated FOSB-expression; a potential marker of valproate sensitivity in AML. Br J Haematol 144: 332–341. pmid:19036090
- 21. Tan M, Luo H, Lee S, Jin F, Yang JS, et al. (2011) Identification of 67 histone marks and histone lysine crotonylation as a new type of histone modification. Cell 146: 1016–1028. pmid:21925322
- 22. McLaughlin SK, Olsen SN, Dake B, De Raedt T, Lim E, et al. (2013) The RasGAP gene, RASAL2, is a tumor and metastasis suppressor. Cancer Cell 24: 365–378. pmid:24029233
- 23. van der Weyden L, Rust AG, McIntyre RE, Robles-Espinoza CD, del Castillo Velasco-Herrera M, et al. (2013) Jdp2 downregulates Trp53 transcription to promote leukaemogenesis in the context of Trp53 heterozygosity. Oncogene 32: 397–402. pmid:22370638
- 24. Zheng YS, Zhang H, Zhang XJ, Feng DD, Luo XQ, et al. (2012) MiR-100 regulates cell differentiation and survival by targeting RBSP3, a phosphatase-like tumor suppressor in acute myeloid leukemia. Oncogene 31: 80–92. pmid:21643017
- 25. Marcucci G, Radmacher MD, Maharry K, Mrozek K, Ruppert AS, et al. (2008) MicroRNA expression in cytogenetically normal acute myeloid leukemia. N Engl J Med 358: 1919–1928. pmid:18450603
- 26. Mariathasan S, Monack DM (2007) Inflammasome adaptors and sensors: intracellular regulators of infection and inflammation. Nat Rev Immunol 7: 31–40. pmid:17186029
- 27. Schwind S, Maharry K, Radmacher MD, Mrozek K, Holland KB, et al. (2010) Prognostic significance of expression of a single microRNA, miR-181a, in cytogenetically normal acute myeloid leukemia: a Cancer and Leukemia Group B study. J Clin Oncol 28: 5257–5264. pmid:21079133
- 28. Landais S, Landry S, Legault P, Rassart E (2007) Oncogenic potential of the miR-106–363 cluster and its implication in human T-cell leukemia. Cancer Res 67: 5699–5707. pmid:17575136
- 29. Tang W, Jiang Y, Mu X, Xu L, Cheng W, et al. (2014) MiR-135a functions as a tumor suppressor in epithelial ovarian cancer and regulates HOXA10 expression. Cell Signal 26: 1420–1426. pmid:24607788
- 30. Navarro A, Diaz T, Martinez A, Gaya A, Pons A, et al. (2009) Regulation of JAK2 by miR-135a: prognostic impact in classic Hodgkin lymphoma. Blood 114: 2945–2951. pmid:19666866
- 31. Gao L, Yang Y, Xu H, Liu R, Li D, et al. (2014) miR-335 functions as a tumor suppressor in pancreatic cancer by targeting OCT4. Tumour Biol. pmid:25549795
- 32. Qiu T, Zhou X, Wang J, Du Y, Xu J, et al. (2014) MiR-145, miR-133a and miR-133b inhibit proliferation, migration, invasion and cell cycle progression via targeting transcription factor Sp1 in gastric cancer. FEBS Lett 588: 1168–1177. pmid:24613927
- 33. Song SJ, Ito K, Ala U, Kats L, Webster K, et al. (2013) The oncogenic microRNA miR-22 targets the TET2 tumor suppressor to promote hematopoietic stem cell self-renewal and transformation. Cell Stem Cell 13: 87–101. pmid:23827711
- 34. Marcucci G, Mrozek K, Radmacher MD, Garzon R, Bloomfield CD (2011) The prognostic and functional role of microRNAs in acute myeloid leukemia. Blood 117: 1121–1129. pmid:21045193
- 35. Garzon R, Volinia S, Liu CG, Fernandez-Cymering C, Palumbo T, et al. (2008) MicroRNA signatures associated with cytogenetics and prognosis in acute myeloid leukemia. Blood 111: 3183–3189. pmid:18187662
- 36. Emmrich S, Katsman-Kuipers JE, Henke K, Khatib ME, Jammal R, et al. (2014) miR-9 is a tumor suppressor in pediatric AML with t(8;21). Leukemia 28: 1022–1032. pmid:24270738
- 37. Garzon R, Heaphy CE, Havelange V, Fabbri M, Volinia S, et al. (2009) MicroRNA 29b functions in acute myeloid leukemia. Blood 114: 5331–5341. pmid:19850741
- 38. Yanaihara N, Caplen N, Bowman E, Seike M, Kumamoto K, et al. (2006) Unique microRNA molecular profiles in lung cancer diagnosis and prognosis. Cancer Cell 9: 189–198. pmid:16530703
- 39. Sirotkin AV, Laukova M, Ovcharenko D, Brenaut P, Mlyncek M (2010) Identification of microRNAs controlling human ovarian cell proliferation and apoptosis. J Cell Physiol 223: 49–56. pmid:20039279
- 40. Aravind S, Pablo T, Vamsi KM, Sayan M, Benjamin LE, et al. (2005) Gene set enrichment analysis: A knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102: 15545–15550. pmid:16199517
- 41. Lee HJ, Daver N, Kantarjian HM, Verstovsek S, Ravandi F (2013) The role of JAK pathway dysregulation in the pathogenesis and treatment of acute myeloid leukemia. Clin Cancer Res 19: 327–335. pmid:23209034
- 42. Ufkin ML, Peterson S, Yang X, Driscoll H, Duarte C, et al. (2014) miR-125a regulates cell cycle, proliferation, and apoptosis by targeting the ErbB pathway in acute myeloid leukemia. Leuk Res 38: 402–410. pmid:24484870