Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

An Elevated Body Mass Index Increases Lung Volume but Reduces Airflow in Italian Schoolchildren

  • Fabio Cibella ,

    fabio.cibella@ibim.cnr.it

    Affiliation National Research Council of Italy, Institute of Biomedicine and Molecular Immunology, Palermo, Italy

  • Andreina Bruno,

    Affiliation National Research Council of Italy, Institute of Biomedicine and Molecular Immunology, Palermo, Italy

  • Giuseppina Cuttitta,

    Affiliation National Research Council of Italy, Institute of Biomedicine and Molecular Immunology, Palermo, Italy

  • Salvatore Bucchieri,

    Affiliation National Research Council of Italy, Institute of Biomedicine and Molecular Immunology, Palermo, Italy

  • Mario Raphael Melis,

    Affiliation National Research Council of Italy, Institute of Biomedicine and Molecular Immunology, Palermo, Italy

  • Stefano De Cantis,

    Affiliation Department of Economics, Statistics, and Business Sciences—University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy

  • Stefania La Grutta,

    Affiliation National Research Council of Italy, Institute of Biomedicine and Molecular Immunology, Palermo, Italy

  • Giovanni Viegi

    Affiliation National Research Council of Italy, Institute of Biomedicine and Molecular Immunology, Palermo, Italy

Abstract

Background

Asthma and obesity are important and growing health issues worldwide. Obesity is considered a risk factor for asthma, due to the induction of changes in airway mechanics and altered airway inflammation.

Methods

We cross-sectionally investigated the effect of increased weight on pulmonary function in a large population sample of healthy children, aged 10–17 yrs living in Palermo, Italy. Explanatory effect of weight on lung function variables were evaluated by multiple linear regression models, taking into account height, gender, and age-class.

Results

Among the 2,393 subjects, FVC and FEV1 were positively correlated to weight. Multiple regression models showed that the weight beta coefficient for FEV1 was significantly lower with respect to that for FVC (0.005 and 0.009 l/kg, respectively), indicating a different magnitude in explanatory effect of weight on FVC and FEV1. Both FEV1/FVC and FEF25–75%/FVC ratios were negatively correlated to weight, while FEF25–75% was not significantly correlated. Similar results were obtained also when 807 symptomatic subjects were introduced in the model through a sensitivity analysis.

Conclusion

In healthy children, the disproportionate increase of FEV1 and FVC with weight produces airflow decrease and consequently apparent poorer lung function independently from respiratory disease status.

Introduction

Asthma and obesity are two important and growing health issues in industrialized countries. The prevalence of overweight children in the United States is continuing to increase, having risen from 6.5% to approximately 19% in schoolchildren between 1976–1980 and 2003–2004 [1], while the prevalence of adolescent obesity has nearly tripled in the last 2 decades [2]. This issue is not limited to the United States but involves many other Western and developing countries as well [3,4]. A recent report from the American Thoracic Society indicates that obesity is a risk factor for asthma in all evaluated demographic groups and that factors which could contribute to asthma pathogenesis in obese individuals include both airway mechanics and altered inflammation and immune responses related to being obese [5].

Numerous cross-sectional studies have reported that the prevalence of asthma is higher in obese versus lean individuals. Particularly, in a recent cross-sectional study conducted on 5,351 children aged 4–18 years, obesity was associated with a higher prevalence of asthma in children, with no evidence of significant modulation by either gender or age [6]. Furthermore, prospective studies, performed on both children and adults, have indicated that obesity antedates asthma and that weight-loss is associated with substantial improvements in the clinical status, lung function, symptoms, and asthma control in severe asthmatics with high body mass index (BMI) [7]. On the other hand, a recent prospective study investigating 6–15 year-old asthmatics concluded that the observed relationships between respiratory function with BMI are not specific of asthma, and being overweight is not associated with significant clinical impacts on asthma during childhood [8]. In addition, another prospective study performed in both children and adults found that there was no relationship in children between BMI and severity of asthma, spirometry findings, quality of life, or health care utilization [9]. Similarly, we have recently demonstrated that being overweight-obese does not have a significant effect on airway inflammation as measured by exhaled nitric oxide in adolescents [10].

Furthermore, when the relationship between body fat and lung function was evaluated in subjects of both genders without respiratory diseases, inconsistent results were obtained [11,12].

Therefore, the present study was aimed at investigating the effect produced by weight on pulmonary function in healthy children through the evaluation of a large sample of children previously enrolled in two cross-sectional surveys and all included in a narrow age range [13,14].

Materials and Methods

Two cross sectional studies were performed on random samples of white Caucasian schoolchildren, aged 10–17 years, living in the city of Palermo, in the Mediterranean area of southern Italy: the first one in 2004, on 1,050 children from 8 schools [13], the second one in 2005–2006, on 2,150 children from 16 schools [14].

Self-administered questionnaires were completed by adolescents at school, regarding past and current respiratory allergic symptoms and personal information. A child's history of “wheeze ever” was defined as a positive answer to the question “Have you ever had wheezing or whistling in your life”. A history of nocturnal cough and post-exercise cough or wheeze was also investigated. Information on possible confounders or effect modifiers was also collected. Exposure to mould/dampness at home was evaluated using the question: “Have you ever seen mould/dampness/fungi on the walls or on the ceiling of your bedroom”. Current passive smoking exposure (ETS) was assessed through the question “Are there smokers at home”. Self-reported traffic exposure was recorded as the frequency of trucks passing on the street of residence on weekdays (never/rare/frequent/constant), and subjects were considered exposed if they answered ‘frequent’ or ‘constant’.

Height and weight were measured in all the children in a standing position without shoes, using a stadiometer and an electronic digital scale: BMI was computed as weight/height2 (kg/m2). Overweight (OW) and obese (O) children were defined following the gender- and age-specific cut-off points for overweight and obese by Cole et al [15]. Pulmonary function tests were performed through a portable spirometer (MicroLoop, Micro Medical, Chatham Maritime, Kent, UK). Forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), forced vital capacity (FVC) and maximum mid-expiratory flow (FEF25–75%) were measured according to ATS/ERS guidelines [16]: the best FVC and FEV1 were retained and FEF25–75% was selected from the manoeuvre with the largest sum of FEV1 and FVC. Spirometric predicted values were those from Quanjer et al [17]. For each subject, FEV1/FVC and FEF25–75%/FVC ratios were also computed.

Statistics

A total of 3,200 children were enrolled, of which 807 reporting wheeze ever, nocturnal cough, or exercise-induced cough were excluded from the initial analyses: thus, 2,393 healthy subjects were evaluated.

Absolute values of FVC, FEV1, and FEF25–75%, along with absolute FEV1/FVC and FEF25–75%/FVC ratios were introduced into multiple linear regression models (as dependent variables) and tested against sex, age (as age classes: ≤11, 12, 13, and ≥14 years), weight, height (i.e., the two components of BMI). One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used for testing differences between means. The possible association between categorical variables was evaluated by χ2 test.

Ethics Statement

Both the epidemiological studies were approved by the Ethics Committee of the University Hospital of Palermo. All parents of the invited schoolchildren signed a written informed consent. According to Italian law, respect of individual privacy concerning clinical data was guaranteed.

Results

None of the investigated children declared him/herself to be an active smoker. The initial evaluation was performed on 2,393 healthy subjects: there were 654 (27.3%) OW and 279 (11.7%) O. General characteristics of the study sample are presented in Table 1. The prevalence of OW and O subjects was significantly higher among boys. The characteristics of the children reporting respiratory symptoms and thus excluded from the analysis are reported in Table 2: spirometric indices of airflow limitation showed that pulmonary function was significantly poorer in symptomatic rather than asymptomatic subjects, whereas no difference was found in BMI. Symptomatic subjects showed an increased frequency of domestic exposure to ETS, mould/dampness, and self-reported heavy traffic exposure. The prevalence of OW and O among symptomatic subjects was 28.0% and 13.0% respectively, not significantly different from that found in asymptomatic individuals (Table 2).

thumbnail
Table 1. General characteristics of the study sample composed by asymptomatic children, separately for males and females (No. = 2,393).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127154.t001

thumbnail
Table 2. Characteristics of enrolled sample (No. = 3,200).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127154.t002

In healthy children, the available variables potentially acting as confounding factors or effect modifiers were included in a multiple regression model. A backward stepwise selection process allowed us to extrapolate the only variables with a significant effect on respiratory indices, excluding domestic ETS, mould/dampness, and self-reported traffic exposures, thus identifying a “minimal” set including sex, age, height, and weight. Moreover, interactions between variables were tested, but none of them were determined to be significant. In Tables 3 and 4, R2 values and the β coefficients (with 95% confidence intervals) are provided for the multiple linear regression models with either FVC, FEV1, and FEF25–75% (Table 3) or FEV1/FVC and FEF25–75%/FVC (Table 4) as dependent variables. When controlling for sex, age, and height, weight showed significant and positive β coefficients for both FVC and FEV1: it is noteworthy that the weight β coefficient for FVC was higher than the weight β coefficient for FEV1. While the weight β coefficient was not significant for FEF25–75%, those relevant to FEV1/FVC and FEF25–75%/FVC were negative and significant. To confirm these results and avoid any age effect, we performed the same analysis stratifying the regression model by age classes. The results confirmed the significant weight effect within each age class (Table 5): furthermore, the weight β coefficient for FVC was always higher than the weight β coefficient for FEV1 and those for FEV1/FVC and FEF25–75%/FVC were always negative (with the exception of the weight β coefficient for FEV25–75%/FVC, which was not significant in the ≤11 years age class). In Fig 1 a graphical representation of the FVC/weight and FEV1/weight relationships is presented: the regression lines (along with relevant 95% confidence intervals) were produced using coefficients from Table 3 for a male child belonging to the ≥14 years age class of 1.64m height (the mean height of males in that age class in the studied sample).

thumbnail
Fig 1. Slopes of FVC and FEV1 linear regression lines to weight.

Linear regression lines (i.e., the fitted values followed by the lower and upper bounds of the 95% confidence interval for mean response) of the relationships between Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) and Forced Expiratory Volume in One second (FEV1), as response variables, and weight, as explanatory one, plotted according to parameters estimates in Table 3, for a male child belonging to the ≥14 yrs old age class, of 1.64m height (mean value for male 14 yrs old subjects in the sample).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127154.g001

thumbnail
Table 3. Parameter estimated by multiple linear regression analysis models for FVC, FEV1, and FEF25–75% as dependent variables and sex, age class, height, and weight as independent variables.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127154.t003

thumbnail
Table 4. Parameter estimated by multiple linear regression analysis models for FEV1/FVC and FEF25–75%/FVC as dependent variables and sex, age class, height, and weight as independent variables.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127154.t004

thumbnail
Table 5. β coefficients* estimated by multiple linear regression analysis for FVC, FEV1, FEV25–75%, FEV1/FVC, and FEV25–75%/FVC as dependent variables and sex, height, and weight as independent variables, separately for each age class (≤11, 12, 13, and ≥14 years), among 2,393 asymptomatic children.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127154.t005

When mean values of lung function variables were analyzed in OW and O categories, FEV1 and FVC (in percent of predicted) were significantly higher in both OW and O sub-samples (male and female, while no difference was found for FEF25–75% (Table 6). Conversely, FEV1/FVC and FEF25–75%/FVC (absolute percent) were lower in both male and female OW and O subjects (Table 6). As a sensitivity analysis, we performed the same comparisons on the whole sample also including the 807 children reporting wheeze ever or nocturnal cough or exercise-induced cough, for a total of 3,200 subjects (Tables 7 and 8). In this model, the presence/absence of allergic respiratory diseases was introduced as an independent variable: intercepts and weight β coefficients for FVC, FEV1, FEV1/FVC, FEF25–75%, and FEF25–75%/FVC remained substantially unchanged. The β coefficients for presence of respiratory symptoms were significant for FEV1, FEV1/FVC, FEF25–75%, and FEF25–75%/FVC. Among symptomatic children, the differences in mean lung function values among non OW-O, OW and O subjects were quite similar to those found in asymptomatic individuals (Table 9).

thumbnail
Table 6. Analysis performed on 2,393 asymptomatic children.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127154.t006

thumbnail
Table 7. Parameter estimated by multiple linear regression analysis models for FVC, FEV1, and FEV25–75% as dependent variables and sex, age class, presence/ absence of personal history of respiratory symptoms, height, and weight as independent variables.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127154.t007

thumbnail
Table 8. Parameter estimated by multiple linear regression analysis models for FEV1/FVC and FEV25–75%/FVC as dependent variables and sex, age class, presence/ absence of personal history of respiratory symptoms, height, and weight as independent variables.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127154.t008

thumbnail
Table 9. Analysis performed on 807 children reporting wheeze, nocturnal cough, or exercise-induced cough.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127154.t009

Discussion

In the present cross-sectional study, by evaluating 2,393 children without any personal history of wheeze, nocturnal cough or exercise-induced cough, we found that FVC and FEV1 appear to be positively correlated to weight in both males and females when corrected for sex, age, and height. Conversely, FEF25–75% was not correlated to weight, while FEV1/FVC and FEF25–75%/FVC were negatively correlated to weight. These results produce further explanation for the identification of signs of respiratory impairment found in obese-overweight children without any history of obstructive respiratory disease [11,12].

Relationship between lung function and weight

Checking the studies evaluating the effects of being overweight and obese on ventilatory function, it is notable that the relationship between lung function and BMI in children remains unclear [6,9], especially in healthy children. By a multiple regression model, we accounted for differences in age, gender, and height in the relationship between weight and respiratory variables. In this model, we found a non significant interaction between gender and weight: i.e., gender does not appear to influence the relationship between weight and respiratory variables, in agreement with a previous study by He et al, in which the positive correlation of FVC to BMI was significant in all children gender categories [18]. Conversely, Lang et al [19] found that obesity was associated with significantly reduced FEV1/FVC in males, while it was associated with improved lung function among females. In the latter study, performed in children with poorly controlled asthma, the significant decrease in FEV1/FVC ratio was obtained among obese males through a slight reduction in FEV1 and a slight increase in FVC. Among obese females, FEV1 and FVC increased and FEV1/FVC remained unchanged.

In each age class, the weight β coefficients for FVC were more elevated than the weight β coefficients for FEV1. This produced a disproportionate increase of FEV1 and FVC with increasing weight (Tables 3 and 7 and Fig 1): thus, the weight β coefficients for FEV1/FVC were negative (0.1 decrease per each kg of weight increase), and consequently FEV1/FVC resulted lower in OW and O subjects. Nevertheless, when small airways were evaluated by measuring FEF25–75% [20], the weight β coefficient for FEF25–75% was not significant. Similarly to the FEV1/FVC ratio, weight presented a negative β coefficient for FEF25–75%/FVC and this was significantly lower among both male and female OW-O subjects. The ratio between FEF25–75% and FVC has been used as a surrogate measure of “dysanapsis”, reflecting the inequalities between the geometry of the tracheobronchial tree and the lung parenchyma [21]. Accordingly, a lower FEF25–75/FVC ratio was associated with higher airway sensitivity and reactivity to methacholine in susceptible subjects [22]. Our results support the hypothesis that, in children, the height corrected weight gain behaves as an index of body growth (that, in turn, produces an increase in lung volumes) [11]. Nevertheless, as weight increases, the disproportionate changes in FEV1 vs FVC and in FEF25–75% vs FVC could cause a reduction of relative airway size (as expressed by using FEV1/FVC and FEF25–75%/FVC ratios as surrogate measures) at higher BMI values. Consequently, adolescents with a higher BMI may show proportionally narrower airways: this might, at least in part, contribute to the reported association between being overweight-obese and asthma [23].

Effect of adiposity on airways and previous reports

Mechanical effects of adiposity are likely to occur in airways [24] and our data are in agreement with previous studies on children suggesting that higher BMI is associated with reduced lung function, as demonstrated by a lower FEV1/FVC ratio [2527], and predicts higher asthma incidence in both sexes [28]. Consistently with our results, recently Han et al found that among children without asthma BMI was positively associated with FEV1 and FVC but inversely associated with FEV1/FVC [29]. Moreover, Davidson et al showed a positive correlation between FVC and BMI, while the relationship FEV1/BMI resulted not significant [30]. In the same paper, despite the fact that a negative correlation was found between expiratory reserve volume (ERV) and BMI, no significant change in total lung capacity was observed. Although no ERV measure was performed in the present work, in our opinion the quoted results further support the hypothesis of a mechanical effect of adiposity on airways with a redistribution of relevant lung volumes.

Interestingly, when we introduced the presence/absence of respiratory symptoms into the model, the β coefficients of all the variables remained unchanged. Moreover, when we repeated the analyses on symptomatic children, for each evaluated variable we found similar differences among non OW-O, overweight, and obese subjects. Thus, it seems that the effects of being overweight-obese on lung function may be independent from asthma-related airway obstruction. Because overweight and obese children showing reduced airflow may also have more asthma-like symptoms (primarily during physical exertion) [8], they may be affected by asthma overdiagnosis [23,31].

Our findings of significantly lower FEV1/FVC and FEF25–75%/FVC values in OW and O subjects are in line with the results of a longitudinal study performed on 654 young Australian adults (aged 27–36 years), first studied at the ages of 9, 12, or 15 years in which BMI and Lean Body Mass (LBM) were derived from anthropometric measures at baseline and at follow-up [32]. This study shows that the beneficial effect of increased BMI in childhood on adult FEV1 and FVC observed in previous longitudinal studies is likely to be attributable to larger childhood LBM and not to adiposity. Similarly, Tantisira et al showed that, along with an increase in spirometric indices, BMI increase was correlated to decrements in FEV1/FVC ratio, even in absence of asthma symptoms [33].

Adipose tissue is now recognized as a multifunctional organ with endocrine function through the production of different adipokines involved in inflammatory processes at different levels. In addition, obesity may cause chronic low-grade inflammation, contributing to systemic metabolic dysfunction associated with obesity-linked disorders [34]. Currently, this issue is still controversial. The mechanistic basis underlying the association between obesity and asthma has not been established, but many factors might contribute to it, such as mechanical factors, aspects of the systemic inflammation related to obesity including changes in energy-regulating hormones, comorbidities of obesity, or predisposition to common etiologies [35].

Strength of the present study is the evaluation of lung function in a large sample of children with a limited age-range. This allowed us to proceed in two steps. In the first step, we excluded subjects with a personal history of chronic respiratory symptoms: thus, we estimated the relationship between BMI and lung function without the interference of respiratory symptoms/diseases, also taking into account possible confounders such as domestic exposure to ETS, mould/dampness, and self-reported heavy traffic exposure. In the second step, as a sensitivity analysis, we repeated comparisons while including children with a personal history of allergic respiratory disease as well, ruling out a possible effect-modification on the physiological relationship between weight and lung function.

A possible limitation is the use of BMI as a proxy for adiposity. We are aware that BMI may not truly reflect adiposity, or give information on lean body mass. However, BMI is a simple epidemiological measure which is easily applied in large population studies, and it has recently demonstrated to correlate well to body fat mass in children and adolescents [36]. Moreover, despite none of the children enrolled for the study declared to be an active smoker, it is possible that some of them hid the truth for convenience: this, along with other potential confounding factors not included in the preliminary backward stepwise selection process, could have produced some interference in the analyses, even though all subjects presenting respiratory symptoms were excluded from the evaluation.

Conclusions

Our study shows that both FVC and FEV1 are positively correlated to weight, when corrected for height. Nevertheless, due to a different magnitude in explanatory effect of weight on FVC and FEV1, the latter shows a disproportionate lower increase with weight gain with respect to FVC. Thus, at higher BMI, this phenomenon decreases both FEV1/FVC and FEF25–75%/FVC levels, independently from respiratory symptoms/diseases.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank all the children and their parents who made the study possible.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: FC AB GC SB MRM SDC SLG GV. Performed the experiments: FC AB SB MRM. Analyzed the data: FC AB GC SB MRM SDC SLG GV. Wrote the paper: FC AB GC SB MRM SDC SLG GV.

References

  1. 1. Ogden CL, Carroll MD, Curtin LR, McDowell MA, Tabak CJ, et al. (2006) Prevalence of overweight and obesity in the United States, 1999–2004. JAMA 295: 1549–1555 pmid:16595758
  2. 2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Obesity rates among all children in the United States. Available http://www.cdc.gov/obesity/childhood/data.html Accessed 03 September 2014
  3. 3. Monteiro CA, Moura EC, Conde WL, Popkin BM. (2004) Socioeconomic status and obesity in adult populations of developing countries: a review. Bull World Health Organ 82: 940–946 pmid:15654409
  4. 4. Popkin BM, Gordon-Larsen P. (2004) The nutrition transition: worldwide obesity dynamics and their determinants. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 28 Suppl 3: S2–9 pmid:15543214
  5. 5. Dixon AE, Holguin F, Sood A, Salome CM, Pratley RE, et al. (2010) American Thoracic Society Ad Hoc Subcommittee on Obesity and Lung Disease. An official American Thoracic Society Workshop report: obesity and asthma. Proc Am Thorac Soc 7: 325–335 pmid:20844291
  6. 6. Yao TC, Ou LS, Yeh KW, Lee WI, Chen LC, et al. (2011) Associations of Age, Gender, and BMI with Prevalence of Allergic Diseases in Children: PATCH Study. J Asthma 48: 503–510 pmid:21599561
  7. 7. Chanez P, Wenzel SE, Anderson GP, Anto JM, Bel EH, et al. (2007) Severe asthma in adults: what are the important questions? J Allergy Clin Immunol 119: 1337–1348 pmid:17416409
  8. 8. Mahut B, Beydon N, Delclaux C. (2012) Overweight is not a comorbidity factor during childhood asthma: the GrowthOb study. Eur Respir J 39: 1120–1126 pmid:21885396
  9. 9. Peters JI, McKinney JM, Smith B, Wood P, Forkner E, et al. (2011) Impact of obesity in asthma: evidence from a large prospective disease management study. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 106: 30–35 pmid:21195942
  10. 10. Cibella F, Cuttitta G, La Grutta S, Melis MR, Bucchieri S, et al. (2011) A cross-sectional study assessing the relationship between BMI, asthma, atopy and eNO among schoolchildren. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 107: 330–336 pmid:21962093
  11. 11. Schwartz JD, Katz SA, Fegley RW, Tockman MS. (1988) Analysis of spirometric data from a national sample of healthy 6- to 24-year-olds (NHANES II). Am Rev Respir Dis 138: 1405–1414 pmid:3202495
  12. 12. Fung KP, Lau SP, Chow OK, Lee J, Wong TW. (1990) Effects of overweight on lung function. Arch Dis Child 65: 512–515 pmid:2357090
  13. 13. Cibella F, Cuttitta G, La Grutta S, Passalacqua G, Viegi G. (2008) Factors that influence exhaled nitric oxide in Italian schoolchildren. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 101: 407–412 pmid:18939730
  14. 14. Cibella F, Cuttitta G, La Grutta S, Melis MR, Lospalluti ML, et al (2011). Proportional Venn diagram and determinants of allergic respiratory diseases in Italian adolescents. Pediatr Allergy Immunol 22: 60–68 pmid:20825572
  15. 15. Cole TJ, Bellizzi MC, Flegal KM, Dietz WH. (2000) Establishing a standard definition for child overweight and obesity worldwide: international survey. BMJ 320: 1240–1243 pmid:10797032
  16. 16. Miller MR, Hankinson J, Brusasco V, Burgos F, Casaburi R, et al. (2005) Standardisation of spirometry. Eur Respir J 26: 319–338 pmid:16055882
  17. 17. Quanjer PH, Stanojevic S, Cole TJ, Baur X, Hall GL, et al. (2012) Multi-ethnic reference values for spirometry for the 3-95-yr age range: the global lung function 2012 equations. Eur Respir J 40: 1324–1343 pmid:22743675
  18. 18. He QQ, Wong TW, Du L, Jiang ZQ, Qiu H, et al. (2009) Respiratory health in overweight and obese Chinese children. Pediatr Pulmonol 44: 997–1002 pmid:19768805
  19. 19. Lang JE, Holbrook JT, Wise RA, Dixon AE, Teague WG, et al. (2013) Obesity in children with poorly controlled asthma: Sex differences. Pediatr Pulmonol 48: 847–856 pmid:23143849
  20. 20. Schilero GJ, Grimm DR, Bauman WA, Lenner R, Lesser M. (2005) Assessment of airway caliber and bronchodilator responsiveness in subjects with spinal cord injury. Chest 127: 149–155 pmid:15653976
  21. 21. Litonjua AA, Sparrow D, Weiss ST. (1999) The FEF25-75%/FVC ratio is associated with methacholine airway responsiveness. The normative aging study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 159: 1574–1579 pmid:10228129
  22. 22. Parker AL, Abu-Hijleh M, McCool FD. (2003) Ratio between forced expiratory flow between 25% and 75% of vital capacity and FVC is a determinant of airway reactivity and sensitivity to methacholine. Chest 124: 63–69 pmid:12853503
  23. 23. Beuther DA, Sutherland ER. (2007) Overweight, obesity, and incident asthma: a meta-analysis of prospective epidemiologic studies. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 175: 661–666 pmid:17234901
  24. 24. Nicolacakis K, Skowronski ME, Coreno AJ, West E, Nader NZ, et al. (2008) Observations on the physiological interactions between obesity and asthma. J Appl Physiol 105: 1533–1541 pmid:18787093
  25. 25. Lang JE, Hossain J, Dixon AE, Shade D, Wise RA, et al. (2011) Does age impact the obese asthma phenotype? Longitudinal asthma control, airway function, and airflow perception among mild persistent asthmatics. Chest 140:1524–1533 pmid:21799027
  26. 26. Kattan M, Kumar R, Bloomberg GR, Mitchell HE, Calatroni A, et al. (2010) Asthma control, adiposity, and adipokines among inner-city adolescents. J Allergy Clin Immunol 125:584–592 pmid:20226295
  27. 27. Forno E, Lescher R, Strunk R, Weiss S, Fuhlbrigge A, et al. (2011) Childhood Asthma Management Program Research Group. Decreased response to inhaled steroids in overweight and obese asthmatic children. J Allergy Clin Immunol 127:741–749 pmid:21377042
  28. 28. Chu YT, Chen WY, Wang TN, Tseng HI, Wu JR, et al. (2009) Extreme BMI predicts higher asthma prevalence and is associated with lung function impairment in school-aged children. Pediatr Pulmonol 44:472–479 pmid:19360851
  29. 29. Han YY, Forno E, Celedón JC. (2014) Adiposity, fractional exhaled nitric oxide, and asthma in U.S. children. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 190: 32–39 pmid:24922361
  30. 30. Davidson WJ, Mackenzie-Rife KA, Witmans MB, Montgomery MD, Ball GD, Egbogah S, Eves ND. (2014) Obesity negatively impacts lung function in children and adolescents. Pediatr Pulmonol 49: 1003–1010 pmid:24167154
  31. 31. Bibi H, Shoseyov D, Feigenbaum D, Genis M, Friger M, et al. (2004) The relationship between asthma and obesity in children: is it real or a case of over diagnosis? J Asthma 41: 403–410 pmid:15281326
  32. 32. Curry BA, Blizzard CL, Schmidt MD, Walters EH, Dwyer T, et al. (2011) Longitudinal Associations of Adiposity With Adult Lung Function in the Childhood Determinants of Adult Health (CDAH) Study. Obesity (Silver Spring) 19: 2069–2075 pmid:21436794
  33. 33. Tantisira KG, Litonjua AA, Weiss ST, Fuhlbrigge AL. (2003) Association of body mass with pulmonary function in the Childhood Asthma Management Program (CAMP). Thorax 58:1036–1041 pmid:14645968
  34. 34. Ouchi N, Parker JL, Lugus JJ, Walsh K. (2011) Adipokines in inflammation and metabolic disease. Nat Rev Immunol 11: 85–97 pmid:21252989
  35. 35. Shore SA. (2008) Obesity and asthma: possible mechanisms. J Allergy Clin Immunol 121: 1087–1093 pmid:18405959
  36. 36. Phan TL, Maresca MM, Hossain J, Datto GA. (2012) Does body mass index accurately reflect body fat? A comparison of anthropometric measures in the longitudinal assessment of fat mass. Clin Pediatr (Phila) 51: 671–677 pmid:22514190