Figures
Abstract
In an effort to trace the evolution of porcine epidemic diarrhea virus (PEDV), S1 and ORF3 genes of viruses identified in 41 pig farms from seven regions (North, Northeast, Northwest, Central, East, South West, and South, respectively) of China in 2015 were sequenced and analyzed. Sequence analysis revealed that the 41 ORF3 genes and 29 S1 genes identified in our study exhibited nucleotide homologies of 98.2%–100% and 96.6%–100%, respectively; these two genes exhibited low nucleotide sequence similarities with classical CV777 strain and early Chinese strain LZC. Phylogenetic analysis indicated that the identified PEDV strains belonged to global non S-INDEL strains, and exhibited genetic diversity; S1 gene of the HLJ2015/DP1-1 strain harbored an unique deletion of 12 nucleotides (A1130CAACTCCACTG1141); while the Chinese PEDV S-INDEL reference strains included two types of the “CV777” S-INDEL as well as the “US” S-INDEL, and all co-circulated with Chinese non S-INDEL strains. Of 29 identified S1 genes, the SS2 epitope (Y748SNIGVCK755) was highly conserved, while the SS6 epitope (L764QDGQVKI771) and pAPN receptor-binding region (aa 490–615) exhibited amino substitutions. Nine possible recombination events were identified between the 29 identifed S1 genes and the 3 S1 reference genes from early Chinese PEDV strains. The complete S genes of selected Chinese PEDV field strains (2011–2015) showed 5.18%–6.07% nucleotide divergence, which is far higher than the divergence observed in early Chinese PEDV strains (3.1%) (P<0.05). Our data provide evidence that PEDV non S-INDEL strains with genetic diversities and potential recombination circulate in seven regions of China in 2015; Chinese PEDV S-INDEL strains exhibit genetic diversity and co-circulate with non S-INDEL strains.
Citation: Wang E, Guo D, Li C, Wei S, Wang Z, Liu Q, et al. (2016) Molecular Characterization of the ORF3 and S1 Genes of Porcine Epidemic Diarrhea Virus Non S-INDEL Strains in Seven Regions of China, 2015. PLoS ONE 11(8): e0160561. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0160561
Editor: Zhefeng Meng, Fudan University, CHINA
Received: March 23, 2016; Accepted: July 21, 2016; Published: August 5, 2016
Copyright: © 2016 Wang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Data Availability: All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files. All sequence files are available from the GenBank database (accession numbers KU641637–KU641677 and KU710223–KU710250).
Funding: This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. 31472209), the State National Key Laboratory of Veterinary Biotechnology (grant no. SKLVBF201506), the Key Science and Technology Program of Heilongjiang Agriculture Reclamation Bureau during the 13th Five-Year Plan Period (HNK135-04-06-03), and the Program for New Century Excellent Talents in Heilongjiang Provincial University (grant no. 1252-NCET-016). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Introduction
Porcine epidemic diarrhea virus (PEDV), belonging to the order Nidovirales, the subfamily Coronaviridae, and the genus Alphacronavirus, is an enveloped, single-stranded, positive-sense RNA virus. PEDV was identified as the causative agent of porcine epidemic diarrhea (PED) in 1978 [1]. This disease is characterized by severe diarrhea, vomiting and dehydration. PEDV infections can occur in pigs of any age, but infections are most serious in piglets, with morbidity and mortality often reaching 100% [2]. At the end of 2010, a PEDV outbreak occurred in several pig-producing provinces in southern China. Since then, the disease has spread throughout other provinces of China and has resulted in enormous economic losses within the pork industry [3]. Thus far, PEDV infection has been reported in swine-farming countries in Asia, Europe, and North America [4–11].
The highly pathogenic PEDV variant was reported in China in late 2010, and since then there has been wide-spread epidemiological investigation of PEDV variant stains [4]. In December 2013, an S-INDEL strain, OH851, with reduced virulence was reported in the USA. Strain OH851 showed the same insertions and deletions in the spike gene (called S-INDEL) as the classical CV777 strain when compared with highly virulent US prototype strains [12, 13]. Yamamoto et al., (2015) reported one PEDV S-INDEL strain with a low pathogenicity in Japan [14]. While Stadler et al., (2015) reported that the S-INDEL strains, similar to the OH851 strain, were identified in southern Germany [15]. Boniotti et al., (2016) reported a new swine enteric coronavirus generated by recombination of PEDV and swine transmissible gastroenteritis virus (TGEV) [9]. At present, both S-INDEL and non S-INDEL strains co-circulate in the USA, China, and Japan [14, 16]. The accumulating data have revealed the genetic diversity and complex change tendencies of PEDV strains circulating in a global context.
In the majority of PEDV strains, ORF3 gene is highly conserved, while the S1 region of the S gene (S1) shows high variability [17, 18]. As a result of the high sequence variation in the S1 gene, the more conserved ORF3 gene is widely used for diagnosis of PEDV infection. While the more variable S1 gene has been widely applied to studies of PEDV genetic diversity and evolution. Although researchers have continued to do epidemiological monitoring of PEDV infections in China, there is fairly limited information available on currently circulating PEDV viruses in 2015. In this study, molecular epidemiological investigation of PEDV was carried out in seven regions of China in 2015. We used the ORF3 and S1 genes to analyze the genetic evolution of the identified PEDV strains. Our aim was to provide insights into the genetic evolution of PEDV strains circulating in China in 2015.
Materials and Methods
Ethics Statement
The collection of samples from the diseased pigs used in this study was approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of the Harbin Veterinary Research Institute at the Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences in China. The field study did not involve endangered or protected species. No specific permissions were required for locations of samples because the samples were collected from public areas or non-protection areas. The sampling and data publication also were approved by owners of the pig farms.
Collection of PEDV-positive samples
In our study, a total of 165 intestinal tissues samples were obtained from the diseased piglets of 41 PEDV-positive farms in 18 provinces or municipalities of China in 2015. The intestinal tissues samples of the dead animals were collected by veterinarians of each farm, and were stored at −20°C. The diseased piglets exhibited the clinical manifestations of acute diarrhea and vomiting. The antibiotic therapy was not effective for the diseased animals. The 41 farms covered seven administrative districts of China including the Northeastern, Northern, Northwestern, Southwestern, Central, Eastern and Southern regions. Farms were selected as PEDV-positive using the colloidal gold immunochromatographic rapid test strip for PEDV (BioNote, Inc., Republic of Korea) or using RT-PCR. The PEDV infection status of all 165 intestinal samples was further confirmed using the conventional RT-PCR method which targets the ORF3 gene [19]. Briefly, 1 g of intestinal tissue was placed in 5 ml of PBS (pH 7.4), ground up and clarified. The viral RNA was then extracted from the supernatant of each sample using the TIANamp Virus RNA Kit (Tiangen Biotech Co., Ltd., Beijing, China) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The viral cDNA was synthesized by using Moloney murine leukemia virus (RNase H-) reverse transcriptase (Novoprotein Scientific Inc., Shanghai, China) in conjunction with six random nucleotide primers according to manufacturer’s instructions. The PCR amplification of the ORF3 gene was carried out according to the protocol described by Kim et al., (2015) [19]. One positive sample from each farm was selected for sequencing of the ORF3 gene. All nucleotide sequences generated in our study were submitted to GenBank. Sequence analysis was performed using the EditSeq tool in Lasergene DNASTAR™ 5.06 software (DNASTAR Inc., Madison, WI, USA). Multiple sequence alignments were performed using the Multiple Sequence Alignment tool of DNAMAN 6.0 software (Lynnon BioSoft, Point-Claire, Quebec, Canada).
Sequencing and analysis of the PEDV S1 gene
To obtain the S1 gene of PEDV, a pair of specific primers, PEDVS1-F: 5' TTTTCTAATCATTTGGTCAACG 3' and PEDVS1-R: 5' AATACTCATACTAAAGTTGGTGG 3', were designed to amplify the sequence between nucleotide 20609 and 23004 of the PEDV genome. This region was chosen based on the alignment of published PEDV genome sequences obtained from the NCBI GenBank database. The alignment revealed a 2396 bp fragment (partial nsp13 gene +S1 gene) covering the S1 gene. The primer positioning was determined according to the complete genome sequence of PEDV strain CV777 (GenBank accession no. AF353511). PCR amplification was undertaken in 50 μL reaction volumes containing 0.1 μM of forward primer, 0.1 μM of reverse primer, 4 μL of cDNA (synthesized as described previously), 5 μL of 10 × buffer, 0.5 U of ExTaq DNA polymerase (TaKaRa), and an appropriate volume of ddH2O. PCR products were amplified using the following cycle conditions: 30 cycles of 95°C for 1 min, 51°C for 1 min, and 72°C for 3 min, with a final extension at 72°C for 10 min. The reaction was carried out by using an automated GeneAmp PCR System 9700 thermal cycler (Applied Biosystems). The purified PCR products were subjected to Sanger sequencing, and all nucleotide sequences generated in our study were submitted to GenBank. A total of 29 S1 genes, corresponding to the previously sequenced ORF3 genes, were obtained. The epitopes of these 29 S1 genes were analyzed using SS2 (Y748SNIGVCK755) SS6 (L764QDGQVKI771) as described by Sun et al., (2008) [20]. These 29 S1 genes were compared with the PEDV S-INDEL reference strains, and assigned as S-INDEL or non-INDEL strains [16]. The amino acid substitutions in the pAPN receptor-binding region (aa 490–615) of PEDV S1 protein were analyzed and compared to the reference strains [17]. Finally, recombination analysis of the 29 identified S1 genes was carried out using the RDP4 software with parameters similar to those described by Geng et al., (2015) [21, 22].
Phylogenetic analysis
For the phylogenetic analysis, the ORF3 and S1 genes of PEDV strains from different geographical locations within China and the rest of the world were retrieved from the NCBI nucleotide database. Nucleotide sequences of the ORF3 genes are shown in Supporting Information (S1 Fig); nucleotide sequences of the S1 genes are shown in Supporting Information (S2 Fig). These nucleotide sequences were used to generate a neighbor-joining phylogenetic tree of the ORF3 gene or S1 gene using the ClustalX alignment tool in the MEGA6.06 software [23]. Neighbor-joining phylogenetic trees were built using the p-distance model and 1000 bootstrap replicates.
Analysis of S gene variation in PEDV
To explore the genetic variation of PEDV strains, the nucleotide sequences of the entire S gene of selected Chinese PEDV strains were retrieved from the NCBI nucleotide database. The nucleotide divergence of all selected S genes to the S gene of the prototype CV777 strain (Genbank accession no. AF353511) were calculated by using the MegAlign tool included in the Lasergene DNASTAR™ software package (version 5.06). The selected S genes were divided into six groups based on the collection date. These analyses revealed the following: (1) four were early Chinese PEDV strains (Genbank accession no. AY653204/ EF185992/ EU031893/JN547228); (2) 22 were 2011 strains (Genbank accession no. JQ239429-JQ239436/JQ282909/JQ979287-JQ979290/JX188454/JX188455/JX524137/KC196276/KC242897/KP399631-KP399634); (3) 19 were 2012 strains (Genbank accession no. JX112709/JX560761/KC242898-KC242912/KF384500/KP399630); (4) 29 were 2013 strains (Genbank accession no. KF601195-KF601201/KF761675/KJ020932/KP399610-KP399629); (5) 16 were 2014 strains (Genbank accession no. KM242131/KP399601-KP399609/KP890336/KR296665/KR296672-KR296675); and (6) 19 were unique 2015 strains (Genbank accession no. KR095279/KR296663/KR296664/KR296666-KR296671/KR296676-KR809885/KT199103).
Statistical analysis
All data sets were analyzed using a two-tailed, paired Student’s t-test in Microsoft Excel 2007 software. The nucleotide divergence (%) of each group is presented as “average value ± standard deviation”. The different letters (one or more) represent statistically significantly difference (P<0.05) among six groups of the early Chinese PEDV strains (n = 4), PEDV strains from 2011 (n = 22), PEDV strains from 2012 (n = 19), PEDV strains from 2013 (n = 29), PEDV strains from 2014 (n = 16), and PEDV strains from 2015 (n = 19); the same letters (one or more) represent no significant difference (P>0.05) among six groups.
Results
Sequencing and analysis of ORF3 and S1 genes of PEDV
In the current study, 165 samples from 41 PEDV-positive farms in 18 provinces or municipalities of China were identified by RT-PCR or rapid strip test. Of those 165 samples, 137 (83.03%) were confirmed as PEDV positive using by RT-PCR targeting the ORF3 gene of PEDV (Table 1). A total of 41 independent ORF3 genes and 29 S1 genes were successfully sequenced, covering seven regions of China. The sequence comparisons of the ORF3 genes revealed nucleotide homologies of 98.2%–100% and amino acid homologies of 97.8%–99.6% among the 41 PEDV strains; the 41 identifed PEDV strains exhibited 96.4%–97.2% nucleotide sequence homologies with the prototypical CV777 strain (Table 2). Sequence comparisons of the 29 identified S1 genes indicated nucleotide homologies of 96.6%–100% and amino acid homologies of 95.2%–99.5%, while nucleotide and amino acid homologies of 92.0%–92.7% and 89.5%–91.3% respectively, were observed between the 29 identifed PEDV strains and the prototypical CV777 strain (Table 2). These data demonstrated that both the ORF3 and S1 gene of the identified PEDV strains exhibited high sequence similarity to Chinese highly virulent PEDV strain CHYJ130330, Chinese recombinant PEDV strain CH/HNQX-3/14, and US prototype strain USA/Colorado/2013. They also showed low sequence similarity to the CV777 strain (ORF3: 94.7%–96% amino acids identity; S1: 89.5%–91.3% amino acids identity), early Chinese PEDV field strain LZC (ORF3: 93.3%–94.2% amino acids identity; S1: 89.2%–90.5% amino acids identity) (Table 2).
To further reveal the molecular characterization of the 29 identified S1 genes, the type S-INDEL strains, epitopes, and the pAPN receptor-binding regions were analyzed (Fig 1). The 29 identified PEDV strains were classified as the global non S-INDEL strains. The S1 gene of the HLJ2015/DP1-1 strain has a unique deletion of 12 nucleotides at position of 1130–1141 (using CV777 as the reference strain) when compared with S-INDEL and non S-INDEL strains (Fig 1A). The SS2 epitope (Y748SNIGVCK755) was found to be highly conserved in the 29 identified S1 genes, while two amino acid substitution occurred in the SS6 epitope (S764QSGQVKI771) when compared with the CV777 strain (Fig 1B). A total of 7 amino acid (aa) substitutions occurred in pAPN receptor-binding region (aa 490–615) of all identified PEDV S1 genes when compared to the CV777 strain (Fig 1C).
(A) Analysis of the type S-INDEL strain in the identified 29 S1 genes of PEDV. (B) Analysis of the epitopes SS2 (Y748SNIGVCK755) and SS6 (L764QDGQVKI771) in the identified 29 S1 genes of PEDV. (C) Analysis of pAPN receptor-binding region (aa 490–615) in the identified 29 S1 genes of PEDV.
Phylogenetic analysis of PEDV
Phylogenetic analysis using the nucleotide sequences of the ORF3 gene revealed that the 41 identified PEDV strains had a close relationship with Chinese field strains (identified between 2011 and 2015), several North American strains, other Asian strains, and several European strains, and differed from the CV777 strain as well as early PEDV strains from China, South Korea and Japan (Fig 2). The 41 PEDV strains identified in our study formed eight clusters in the ORF3 gene–based phylogenetic tree, in which the PEDV strains collected from same region of China showed genetic diversity from each other. Phylogenetic analysis of ORF3 did not reveal any differences between the S-INDEL and non S-INDEL PEDV strains.
Note. The classical PEDV strain CV777, North American (NA) prototype strain USA/Colorado/2013 (non S-INDEL), US S-INDEL strain OH851, Chinese early PEDV strains (CH/S), Chinese PEDV field strains (2006–2015), and other countries PEDV field strains were choose for genotyping and phylogenetic analysis of the 41 ORF3 genes identified in our study. Light purple dot represents PEDV strains identified in North China; red dot represents PEDV strains identified in East China; pink dot represents PEDV strains identified in Northeast China; grey dot represents PEDV strains identified in Northwest China; green dot represents PEDV strains identified in South China; yellow dot represents PEDV strains identified in Central China; blue green dot represents PEDV strains identified in Southwest China.
The phylogenetic tree drawn from the S1 gene sequences was comprised of two groups (GI and GII). The GI group included the “CV777” S-INDEL PEDV strains from China, South Korea, and the prototypical CV777 strain. While the GII group was split into two subgroups, with the “US” S-INDEL strains and the global non S-INDEL strains clustering apart. The US S-INDEL subgroup included the Japanese S-INDEL strain, the European S-INDEL strains, and several field strains from China, Canada and Vietnam. The 29 strains identified in our study as well as reference strains from China, North America, and other Asian countries fell into the non-INDEL subgroup (Fig 3). This analysis revealed that the 29 identifed PEDV strains were closely related to known Chinese variant strains and the highly pathogenic USA prototype strain USA/Colorado/2013, and formed fourteen different clusters.
Note. The “CV777” S-INDEL strain, North American (NA) prototype strain USA/Colorado/2013 (non S-INDEL), US S-INDEL strain OH851, Chinese S-INDEL strains (LZC, JS2008, and CH/S), Japanese S-INDEL strain ZK-O, South Korea S-INDEL strains (SM98 and virulent DR13), European S-INDEL strains (FR/001/2014, 15V010/BEL/2015, and GER/L00721/2014), Chinese PEDV field strains, and other countries non S-INDEL strains were choose for genotyping and phylogenetic analysis of the 29 S1 genes identified in our study. Light purple dot represents PEDV strains identified in North China; red dot represents PEDV strains identified in East China; pink dot represents PEDV strains identified in Northeast China; grey dot represents PEDV strains identified in Northwest China; green dot represents PEDV strains identified in South China; yellow dot represents PEDV strains identified in Central China; blue green dot represents PEDV strains identified in Southwest China.
Analysis of recombination and variation of PEDV
The recombination analysis of the S1 gene revealed that nine potential recombination events occurred between the 29 strains identified in this study and three early Chinese PEDV strains. The breakpoint positions for the recombination events are shown in the supporting information (S1 Table). Of the nine potential recombination events, six recombination events occurred among the 29 identified PEDV strains, and three recombination events occurred between these 29 PEDV strains and three early Chinese reference strains (Chinese S-INDEL strains) (Table 3). To explore the genetic variation of PEDV strains, the divergence (%) within the S gene was analyzed. The S gene of the prototype CV777 strain was used as the comparator. This data is shown in the supporting information (S3 Fig). Divergence of 5.18%–6.07% within the selected Chinese PEDV field strains (2011–2015) was significantly (P<0.05) higher than the divergence (3.1%) of the early Chinese PEDV strains. There was a trend for increased divergence in the selected Chinese PEDV field strains from 2011 to 2013 but there was a trend toward decreased divergence in the selected Chinese PEDV field strains from 2013 to 2015 (Fig 4).
Note. The values (red) represent “average value ± standard deviation” of the nucleotide divergence (%) of each group; the different letters represent statistically significantly difference (P<0.05) among six groups, and the same letters (one or more) represent no significant difference (P>0.05) among six groups.
Discussion
In this study, we collected 165 samples from 41 PEDV-positive farms in seven regions of China during 2015. After sequencing of the ORF3 and S1 genes, the molecular characterization of the identified PEDV strains was analyzed. Sequence analysis of both the ORF3 and S1 genes revealed that the PEDV strains identified in our study exhibited high similarity to the Chinese PEDV variant reference strains when compared with the CV777 prototype strain or early Chinese PEDV strains. Phylogenetic analysis showed that these identified PEDV strains have different genetic lineages, but that all of the strains have a close relationship with other non-INDEL strains, and are distinct from the “CV777” and “US” S-INDEL strains. Previous reports showed that the PEDV S-INDEL strain had a lower pathogenicity than the North American prototype strain [13, 14]. In our study, the identified PEDV strains and selected Chinese PEDV reference strains were divided into three strain types: (1) “CV777” S-INDELs (early Chinese PEDV strains), (2) “US” S-INDEL (Chinese PEDV field strains), and (3) non S-INDEL (Chinese PEDV field strains) strains. These groupings were similar to those observed for Japanese PEDV strains. This result demonstrates that the PEDV strains from China and Japan are more genetically diverse than those from North American countries. In our study, these PEDV reference strains belonging to the “US” S-INDEL subgroup showed a close relationship to the PEDV strains that fall within the global non S-INDEL subgroup, and differed genetically from the PEDV strains belonging to the “CV777” S-INDEL subgroup. The differences in the pathogenicity among the “CV777” S-INDEL subgroup, the “US” S-INDEL subgroup, and the global non S-INDEL subgroup are an interesting topic and require further studies. Additionally, co-circulation of S-INDEL and non S-INDEL strains should be investigated in an effort to better understand the genetic and pathogenic variability of global PEDV strains.
The PEDV strain USA/Colorado/2013 is a North American (NA) prototype strain with high pathogenicity; while the OH851 strain, an S-INDEL strain, is much less pathogenic [12, 13]. All the PEDV strains identified in our study were genetically distinct from the “US” S-INDEL subgroup which includes OH851, and instead clustered with the highly virulent non S-INDELs subgroup which contains the USA/Colorado/2013 strain. This clustering suggests that those PEDV strains identified in our study should possess high pathogenic potential. However, Chinese highly virulent strains (CHYJ130330 and YN15), Chinese variant attenuated strain (YN144), and Chinese variant strain with reduced virulence (FL2013) were also found in the same subgroup [24–26]. This data implies that the pathogenicity of these Chinese PEDV strains and the type strain of the non S-INDEL subgroup can diverge in pathogenic potential, which means that phylogenetic clustering is not sufficient on its own to predict virus pathogenicity, which would make this an ideal topic for future research. Meanwhile, sequence analysis of ORF3 and S1 genes may not be sufficient to fully reveal the genotype of pathogenic PEDV strains.
Antigenic epitopes and receptor-binding domain represent two important biological functions of the PEDV S protein [20, 27]. In our study, the SS2 epitope (Y748SNIGVCK755) was found to be highly conserved in the 29 identified PEDV strains, which is in line with previous studies [7, 28, 29]; while the SS6 epitope (S764QSGQVKI771) exhibited amino acids substitutions, all of which have been reported in other studies [7, 28, 29]. The C-terminal domain (CTD) of the S1 domain is bound to porcine aminopeptidase N (pAPN) [27], and when the pAPN receptor-binding region of the 29 identified S1 genes was evaluated, we identified 7 different amino acid substitutions when compared with the PEDV CV777 strain. Amino acids substitutions within the SS6 epitope and pAPN receptor-binding region are presumed to be responsible for pathogenic changes of PEDV [21, 30]. Recently, the PEDV variant strains with large deletions in the S gene have been reported in South Korea and Japan [31, 32]. Similar mutant strains have not yet been reported in the pig population of China. In our study, the HLJ2015/DP1-1 strain contains a novel twelve nucleotide deletion (A1130CAACTCCACTG1141) within the S1 gene when compared with the CV777 strain, other non S-INDEL strains, and S-INDEL strains. The 12 nucleotide deletion within the S1 gene was further confirmed as unique when a global survey of PEDV strains was undertaken using the nucleotide BLAST tool from the NCBI. The S1 gene of the strain HLJ2015/DP1-1 was identified in a vaccinated population suffering from long-term diarrhea caused by a single PEDV infection (data not shown). This unique deletion of the S gene was relatively rare in the global non S-INDEL strains, and may result from long-term immune pressure.
Since the outbreak of SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV, the recombination and variation of the coronavirus, especially as it concerns the cross species transmission of the coronavirus, has become a hot research topic [33]. In all of these coronaviruses, the S protein initiates infection by mediating receptor-recognition and membrane fusion and plays a key role in tracing the evolution of coronaviruses. In the past, phylogenetic analysis and identification of nucleotide or amino acid substitutions within the S gene were widely used for evaluating the genetic evolution of PEDV. There were little quantitative measures for evaluating PEDV variation. In our study, the divergences were identified by comparison of specific target sequences within the S gene between the selected Chinese PEDV field strains and the prototype CV777 strain. Using this approach, we were able to show that the selected Chinese PEDV field strains between 2011 and 2015 show a significant increase in diversity when compared to early Chinese PEDV strains, which is in line with previous reports about PEDV variants [4]. The amount of genetic divergence within the selected Chinese PEDV strains showed a downward trend from 2013 to 2015, which may be associated with recent effective control strategies for PEDV in China. Recombination plays a pivotal role in the evolution of coronaviruses, it allows the emergence of new strains with altered virulence, and potentially broader host ranges [9]. In our study, six out of a possible nine recombination events occurred between the 29 identified non S-INDEL strains. The remaining three recombination events occurred between the 29 identified non S-INDEL strains and three early Chinese S-INDEL strains. Recently, the recombination between PEDV and TGEV has generated a new swine enteric coronavirus which has been reported in pig population in Italy [9], confirming the potential for increased or altered virulence in PEDV as a result of recombination. The limited data presented here demonstrates that there is a potential for recombination and that this can occur between both related and unrelated coronaviruses.
Conclusions
This study has identified 41 PEDV strains in seven regions of China in 2015. These strains belong to the non S-INDEL strains, and exhibit genetic diversity as well as evidence of potential recombination. Amino acid substitutions have occurred in both the SS6 epitope and pAPN receptor-binding region; and one PEDV strain was shown to harbor a unique deletion (A1130CAACTCCACTG1141) within the S1 gene. Phylogenetic analysis revealed that three types PEDV strains, non S-INDEL, “CV777” S-INDEL and “US” S-INDEL, co-circulated in swine population in China. However, further studies are needed to clarify the effect of the phylogenetic grouping on the virulence of these PEDV strains.
Supporting Information
S1 Fig. Nucleotide sequences of the PEDV ORF3 gene for generation of phylogenetic tree.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0160561.s001
(TXT)
S2 Fig. Nucleotide sequences of the PEDV S1 gene for generation of phylogenetic tree.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0160561.s002
(TXT)
S3 Fig. The data of the divergence analysis of S gene from Chinese PEDV strains.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0160561.s003
(XLS)
S1 Table. The breakpoint positions of potential recombination events in our study.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0160561.s004
(XLS)
S2 Table. The geographic coordinates of the collected samples (Farm, City or Province).
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0160561.s005
(XLS)
Author Contributions
- Conceived and designed the experiments: DBS LF.
- Performed the experiments: EYW CQL SW ZHW QJL.
- Analyzed the data: DHG BZ.
- Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: DBS.
- Wrote the paper: DBS EYW FZK.
References
- 1. Pensaert MB, de Bouck P. A new coronavirus-like particle associated with diarrhea in swine. Arch Virol. 1978; 58:243–247. pmid:83132
- 2. Wood EN. An apparently new syndrome of porcine epidemic diarrhoea. Vet Rec. 1977; 100:243–244. pmid:888300
- 3. Li W, Li H, Liu Y, Pan Y, Deng F, Song Y, et al. New variants of porcine epidemic diarrhea virus, China, 2011. Emerg Infect Dis. 2012; 18:1350–1353. pmid:22840964
- 4. Sun D, Wang X, Wei S, Chen J, Feng L. Epidemiology and vaccine of porcine epidemic diarrhea virus in China: a mini-review. J Vet Med Sci. 2016; 78:355–363. pmid:26537549
- 5. Pasick J, Berhane Y, Ojkic D, Maxie G, Embury-Hyatt C, Swekla K, et al. Investigation into the role of potentially contaminated feed as a source of the first-detected outbreaks of porcine epidemicdiarrhea in Canada. Transbound Emerg Dis. 2014; 61:397–410. pmid:25098383
- 6. Song D, Park B. Porcine epidemic diarrhoea virus: a comprehensive review of molecular epidemiology, diagnosis, and vaccines. Virus Genes. 2012; 44:167–175. pmid:22270324
- 7. Kim YK, Cho YY, An BH, Lim SI, Lim JA, Cho IS, et al. Molecular characterization of the spike and ORF3 genes of porcine epidemic diarrhea virus in the Philippines. Arch Virol. 2016 Jan 22. [Epub ahead of print]. pmid:26801789
- 8. Steinrigl A, Fernández SR, Stoiber F, Pikalo J, Sattler T, Schmoll F. First detection, clinical presentation and phylogenetic characterization of Porcine epidemic diarrhea virus in Austria. BMC Vet Res. 2015;11:310. pmid:26714453
- 9. Boniotti MB, Papetti A, Lavazza A, Alborali G, Sozzi E, Chiapponi C, et al. Porcine Epidemic Diarrhea Virus and Discovery of a Recombinant Swine Enteric Coronavirus, Italy. Emerg Infect Dis. 2016; 22: 83–87. pmid:26689738
- 10. Sung MH, Deng MC, Chung YH, Huang YL, Chang CY, Lan YC, et al. Evolutionary characterization of the emerging porcine epidemic diarrhea virus worldwide and 2014 epidemic in Taiwan. Infect Genet Evol. 2015; 36:108–115. pmid:26375730
- 11. Mesquita JR, Hakze-van der Honing R, Almeida A, Lourenço M, van der Poel WH, Nascimento MS. Outbreak of Porcine Epidemic Diarrhea Virus in Portugal, 2015. Transbound Emerg Dis. 2015; 62: 586–588. pmid:26344708
- 12. Wang L, Byrum B, Zhang Y. New variant of porcine epidemic diarrhea virus,United States, 2014. Emerg Infect Dis. 2014; 20:917–919. pmid:24750580
- 13. Chen Q, Gauger PC, Stafne MR, Thomas JT, Madson DM, Huang H, et al. Pathogenesis comparison between the United States porcine epidemic diarrhea virus prototype and S-INDEL-variant strains in conventional neonatal piglets. J Gen Virol. 2016 Feb 3. [Epub ahead of print]. pmid:26841768
- 14. Yamamoto R, Soma J, Nakanishi M, Yamaguchi R, Niinuma S. Isolation and experimental inoculation of an S INDEL strain of porcine epidemic diarrhea virus in Japan. Res Vet Sci. 2015; 103:103–106. pmid:26679803
- 15. Stadler J, Zoels S, Fux R, Hanke D, Pohlmann A, Blome S, et al. Emergence of porcine epidemic diarrhea virus in southern Germany. BMC Vet Res. 2015; 11:142. pmid:26135732
- 16. Vlasova AN, Marthaler D, Wang Q, Culhane MR, Rossow KD, Rovira A, et al. Distinct characteristics and complex evolution of PEDV strains, North America, May 2013-February 2014. Emerg Infect Dis. 2014; 20: 1620–1628. pmid:25279722
- 17. Jarvis MC, Lam HC, Zhang Y, Wang L, Hesse RA, Hause BM, et al. Genomic and evolutionary inferences between American and global strains of porcine epidemic diarrhea virus. Prev Vet Med. 2016; 123:175–184. pmid:26611651
- 18. Aydin H, Al-Khooly D, Lee JE. Influence of hydrophobic and electrostatic residues on SARS-coronavirus S2 protein stability: insights into mechanisms of general viral fusion and inhibitor design. Protein Sci. 2014; 23: 603–617. pmid:24519901
- 19. Kim SH, Lee JM, Jung J, Kim IJ, Hyun BH, Kim HI, et al. Genetic characterization of porcine epidemic diarrhea virus in Korea from 1998 to 2013. Arch Virol. 2015; 160: 1055–1064. pmid:25666198
- 20. Sun D, Feng L, Shi H, Chen J, Cui X, Chen H, et al. Identification of two novel B cell epitopes on porcine epidemic diarrhea virus spike protein. Vet Microbiol. 2008; 131:73–81. pmid:18400422
- 21. Martin D, Rybicki E. RDP: detection of recombination amongst aligned sequences. Bioinformatics. 2000; 16: 562–563. pmid:10980155
- 22. Geng Y, Guo D, Li C, Wang E, Wei S, Wang Z, et al. Co-Circulation of the Rare CPV-2c with Unique Gln370Arg Substitution, New CPV-2b with Unique Thr440Ala Substitution, and New CPV-2a with High Prevalence and Variation in Heilongjiang Province, Northeast China. PLoS One 2015; 10:e0137288. pmid:26348721
- 23. Tamura K, Stecher G, Peterson D, Filipski A, Kumar S. MEGA6: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis version 6.0. Mol Biol Evol. 2013; 30: 2725–2729. pmid:24132122
- 24. Jia A, Feng X, Liu Q, Zhou R, Wang G. Complete Genome Sequence of CHYJ130330, a Highly Virulent Strain of Porcine Epidemic Diarrhea Virus in South China. Genome Announc. 2014; 2: pii: e00165–14. pmid:24744324
- 25. Chen F, Zhu Y, Wu M, Ku X, Ye S, Li Z, et al. Comparative Genomic Analysis of Classical and Variant Virulent Parental/Attenuated Strains of Porcine Epidemic Diarrhea Virus. Viruses. 2015; 7: 5525–5538. pmid:26512689
- 26. Zhang X, Pan Y, Wang D, Tian X, Song Y, Cao Y. Identification and pathogenicity of a variant porcine epidemic diarrhea virus field strain with reduced virulence. Virol J. 2015; 12:88. pmid:26063495
- 27. Reguera J, Mudgal G, Santiago C, Casasnovas JM. A structural view of coronavirus-receptor interactions. Virus Res. 2014; 194: 3–15. pmid:25451063
- 28. Hao J, Xue C, He L, Wang Y, Cao Y. Bioinformatics insight into the spike glycoprotein gene of field porcine epidemic diarrhea strains during 2011–2013 in Guangdong, China. Virus Genes. 2014; 49: 58–67. pmid:24771495
- 29. Chen J, Liu X, Shi D, Shi H, Zhang X, Li C, et al. Detection and molecular diversity of spike gene of porcine epidemic diarrhea virus in China. Viruses. 2013; 5:2601–2613. pmid:24153062
- 30. Deng F, Ye G, Liu Q, Navid MT, Zhong X, Li Y, et al. Identification and Comparison of Receptor Binding Characteristics of the Spike Protein of Two Porcine Epidemic Diarrhea Virus Strains. Viruses. 2016; 8: pii: E55. pmid:26907329
- 31. Masuda T, Murakami S, Takahashi O, Miyazaki A, Ohashi S, Yamasato H, et al. New porcine epidemic diarrhoea virus variant with a large deletion in the spike gene identified in domestic pigs. Arch Virol. 2015; 160: 2565–2568. pmid:26162305
- 32. Park S, Kim S, Song D, Park B. Novel porcine epidemic diarrhea virus variantwith large genomic deletion, South Korea. Emerg Infect Dis. 2014; 20: 2089–2092. pmid:25424875
- 33. Lu G, Wang Q, Gao GF. Bat-to-human: spike features determining 'host jump' of coronaviruses SARS-CoV, MERS-CoV, and beyond. Trends Microbiol. 2015; 23: 468–478. pmid:26206723