Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Open Access

Peer-reviewed

Research Article

Association between vertebral cross-sectional area and lumbar lordosis angle in adolescents

  • Tishya A. L. Wren ,

    Contributed equally to this work with: Tishya A. L. Wren, Skorn Ponrartana, Vicente Gilsanz

    Affiliation Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Children’s Hospital Los Angeles, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, United States of America

    ⨯
  • Patricia C. Aggabao ,

    ‡ These authors also contributed equally to this work.

    Affiliation Departments of Radiology, Children’s Hospital Los Angeles, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, United States of America

    ⨯
  • Ervin Poorghasamians ,

    ‡ These authors also contributed equally to this work.

    Affiliation Departments of Radiology, Children’s Hospital Los Angeles, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, United States of America

    ⨯
  • Thomas A. Chavez ,

    ‡ These authors also contributed equally to this work.

    Affiliation Department of Pediatrics, Children’s Hospital Los Angeles, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, United States of America

    ⨯
  • Skorn Ponrartana ,

    Contributed equally to this work with: Tishya A. L. Wren, Skorn Ponrartana, Vicente Gilsanz

    Affiliation Departments of Radiology, Children’s Hospital Los Angeles, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, United States of America

    ⨯
  • Vicente Gilsanz

    Contributed equally to this work with: Tishya A. L. Wren, Skorn Ponrartana, Vicente Gilsanz

    vgilsanz@chla.usc.edu

    Affiliations Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Children’s Hospital Los Angeles, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, United States of America, Departments of Radiology, Children’s Hospital Los Angeles, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, United States of America, Department of Pediatrics, Children’s Hospital Los Angeles, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, United States of America

    ⨯

Abstract

Lumbar lordosis (LL) is more prominent in women than in men, but the mechanisms responsible for this discrepancy are poorly defined. A recent study indicates that newborn girls have smaller vertebral cross-sectional area (CSA) when compared to boys—a difference that persists throughout life and is independent of body size. We determined the relations between vertebral cross-sectional area (CSA) and LL angle and whether sex differences in lumbar lordosis are related to sex differences in vertebral CSA. Using multi-planar magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), we measured vertebral cross-sectional area (CSA) and vertebral height of the spine of 40 healthy boys and 40 girls, ages 9–13 years. Measures of the CSA of the lumbar vertebrae significantly differed between sexes (9.38 ± 1.46 vs. 7.93 ± 0.69 in boys and girls, respectively; P < 0.0001), while the degree of LL was significantly greater in girls than in boys (23.7 ± 6.1 vs. 27.6 ± 8.0 in boys and girls, respectively; P = 0.02). When all subjects were analyzed together, values for LL angle were negatively correlated to vertebral CSA (r = -0.47; P < 0.0001); this was also true when boys and girls were analyzed separately. Multivariate regression analysis indicated that vertebral CSA was independently associated with LL, even after accounting for sex, age, height or vertebral height, and weight. Similar negative relations were present when thoracic vertebrae were analyzed (Model P < 0.0001, R2 = 0.37, thoracic vertebral CSA slope P < 0.0001), suggesting that deficient vertebral cross-sectional dimensions are not merely the consequence of the anterior lumbar curvature. We conclude that vertebral CSA is negatively associated with LL, and that the greater degree of LL in females could, at least in part, be due to smaller vertebral cross-sectional dimensions. Studies are needed to examine the potential relations between vertebral CSA and spinal conditions known to be associated with increased LL, such as spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis.

Citation: Wren TAL, Aggabao PC, Poorghasamians E, Chavez TA, Ponrartana S, Gilsanz V (2017) Association between vertebral cross-sectional area and lumbar lordosis angle in adolescents. PLoS ONE 12(2): e0172844. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0172844

Editor: M. A. Pérez, Universidad de Zaragoza, SPAIN

Received: August 3, 2016; Accepted: February 11, 2017; Published: February 28, 2017

Copyright: © 2017 Wren et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Data Availability: All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.

Funding: The authors received no specific funding for this work.

Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Introduction

Lumbar lordosis (LL) refers to the anterior curvature of the lumbar spine, expressed in humans as a response to upright posture and bipedalism. Accumulating evidence indicates that LL is present in early childhood, increases during adolescence [1], and is more prominent in women than in men [2,3,4,5,6], but neither the reasons nor the mechanisms responsible for this discrepancy are well-defined. A proposed hypothesis for sex differences in vertebral size is that it improves maternal performance in posture and locomotion. Pregnant women habitually extend their lumbar spine to counteract the shift in the center of mass associated with increases in abdominal size and weight by as much as 30% (~7 kg) [7,8,9,10]. Notably, the degree of lumbar lordosis in women is significantly associated with the number of pregnancies [8].

Although variations in lumbar vertebral morphogenesis, such as vertebral wedging and orientation of lumbar facets, have been suggested to facilitate lumbar lordosis [9,11,12], the structural basis for the greater degree of lumbar lordosis in females when compared to males are unclear. Recent data indicate that factors related to sex have a significant effect on intrauterine development of the axial skeleton [13]. Newborn girls have approximately 11% smaller vertebral cross-sectional area (CSA) when compared to boys [13]–a sexual dimorphism that increases further throughout childhood and is greatest at sexual and skeletal maturity [14,15,16]. Since the smaller female vertebra is associated with greater range of spinal motion [17], it could facilitate the lordosis needed to maintain upright posture during pregnancy [12].

Support for the notion that the sexual dimorphism in vertebral size in humans could represent an evolutionary adaptation to bipedal obstetric load would come from demonstrating an association between vertebral CSA and LL angle. In the current study, we examined the degree of LL and vertebral cross-sectional dimensions in 40 boys and 40 girls, ages 9–13 years, and hypothesized that 1) adolescent girls have a greater degree of lumbar lordosis than boys, 2) the degree of lumbar lordosis is predicted by vertebral CSA, and 3) differences in lumbar lordosis between boys and girls are related to sex differences in vertebral CSA.

Materials and methods

Study subjects

The Institutional Review Board for clinical investigations at Children’s Hospital Los Angeles (CHLA) approved this study, which was compliant with the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act. Written informed assent and consent were obtained from all participants and their parents.

For the purpose of this study, we chose boys and girls with ages corresponding to the adolescent growth spurt (9 to 13 years) and in early puberty when LL development markedly increases [4]. Participants were recruited from the AltaMed and Teenage and Young Adult Health Clinics in the Division of General Pediatrics at CHLA. We selected subjects who had a normal physical examination and no history of neuromuscular or chronic disease or use of medication. Subjects were also excluded if they had vertebral or spinal cord anomalies, scoliosis, or experienced recurrent episodes of low back pain. Height and weight measurements were obtained with participants dressed in examination gowns or lightweight clothing, without shoes. Body mass index (BMI) percentile was calculated with the Centers for Disease Control growth charts. For this study, values for testicular volume and degree of breast development were used to determine the Tanner stage of sexual development [18]. Only adolescents in early puberty (defined as Tanner stages 2 and 3) were included.

MRI determinations

All MRI examinations were performed in the supine position with extended legs and without the use of general anesthesia or contrast enhancement. Subjects were examined using a research-dedicated 3.0 Tesla whole-body MRI scanner (Achieva R3.2, Philips Healthcare, Cleveland, Ohio) with a standard 15-channel spine coil. Three dimensional T2-weighted turbo spin echo scans were taken with TE of 120 ms, TR of 3000 ms, a flip angle of 90°, and with a voxel size of 1.0 x 1.0 x 1.0 mm. For the purpose of this study, LL was measured as the angle between the superior endplate of L1 and the inferior endplate of L5 (Fig 1A) [19], and vertebral CSA was measured in the axial plane at the midportion of the vertebral body based on the anterior and posterior heights from T10 to L5 (Fig 1B). Vertebral height was measured as the average of the anterior, posterior and midportion heights in the sagittal plane of the lumbar vertebrae. All measurements were analyzed offline with image processing software (Osirix; Pixmeo, Switzerland). The coefficients of variation for repeated MRI measurements of LL angle, vertebral CSA, and vertebral height are between 0.8–3.0% [20].

thumbnail
Download:
Fig 1. MRI images of the lumbar spine in a 13-year-old girl.

(A) Coned-down sagittal image of the lumbar spine showing the degree of lumbar lordosis measured as the angle between the superior endplate of L1 and the inferior endplate of L5. (B) Axial image outlining the measurement of vertebral CSA at the third lumbar vertebra.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0172844.g001

Data analysis

The data were analyzed with the t-test for unpaired samples, and multivariate regression analysis was used to determine the association between vertebral CSA and LL. Collinearity among predictor variables was considered a tolerance level < 0.01 or variance inflation factor > 10. Confounding variables were considered a > 10% change in the CSA slope. Multivariate regression assumptions (linearity, independence, normality and homoscedasticity) were ascertained. Continuous variables are presented as mean ± SD unless otherwise indicated. Statistical significance was considered p < 0.05. Data was analyzed using SAS (Statistical Software Package v 9.4, Cary, NC).

Results

The characteristics of study subjects are shown in Table 1. Boys were significantly older and heavier, and tended to be taller when compared to girls (Table 1). There were, however, no sex differences in height or weight percentiles between sexes.

thumbnail
Download:
Table 1. Ages, anthropometric characteristics, and MRI measures of vertebral morphology and degree of lumbar lordosis in 80 healthy adolescent boys and girls.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0172844.t001

As expected, measures of the CSA of the lumbar vertebrae significantly differed between sexes (Table 1); on average, vertebral CSA was 15.5% smaller in girls. Measures of vertebral height were comparable between sexes, suggesting that the mild sex differences in standing heights were due to leg lengths. In contrast, the degree of LL was significantly greater in girls than in boys; on average, the angle of lordosis was approximately 16.5% greater in girls (Table 1).

When all subjects were analyzed together, there were no associations between lordosis and age, weight, or standing or vertebral height (all r’s ≤ 0.11; all P’s ≥ 0.32). In contrast, values for LL angle were negatively correlated to vertebral CSA (r = -0.47; P < 0.0001); this was also true when boys and girls were analyzed separately (r’s = -0.53 and -0.33 in boys and girls, respectively; both P’s ≤ 0.04) (Table 2).

thumbnail
Download:
Table 2. Correlation matrix of age, anthropometric characteristics, and MRI measures of vertebral morphology and degree of lumbar lordosis in 40 healthy adolescent boys and 40 adolescent girls.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0172844.t002

Multivariate regression analysis indicated that sex was independently associated with LL, even after accounting for age, height or vertebral height, and weight (Table 3a). The addition of vertebral CSA as an independent variable increased the predictive power of the model (R2 increased from 0.14 to 0.37), but eliminated the contribution of sex (Table 3b).

thumbnail
Download:
Table 3. Multivariate regression models for the prediction of lumbar lordosis without (A) and with (B) the inclusion of vertebral CSA.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0172844.t003

When lumbar vertebral CSA was replaced with the mean vertebral CSA of the low thoracic spine (T10–T12), the negative relationship persisted (Model P < 0.0001, R2 = 0.37, T10–T12 vertebral CSA slope P < 0.0001).

Discussion

Lumbar lordosis is a likely adaptation to ensure stability when standing and walking, yet the structural basis for anterior lumbar curves and the reasons for their greater prominence in females are unclear. In this study, we examined the potential relations between vertebral cross-sectional dimensions and LL, and found that young females have significantly smaller vertebral CSA and a greater degree of lumbar curvature than young males. We also found a significant negative correlation between vertebral CSA and the degree of LL, which was present in both sexes and independent of age, weight, and standing or vertebral height. Moreover, regression analysis indicated that differences in LL between boys and girls were closely related to sex differences in vertebral CSA. Notably, the association between vertebral CSA and LL angle was also present when the cross-sectional dimensions of the thoracic rather than lumbar vertebrae were analyzed. These findings suggest that deficient vertebral growth is not merely the consequence of exaggerated anterior spinal curve, but likely a structural determinant of LL in adolescents.

These findings have particular relevance to women during pregnancy, since smaller vertebrae would facilitate the anterior lumbar curvature needed to compensate for the obstetric load and maintain bipedal posture. They may also offer a new potential predictor of general spinal health. Lumbar spondylolysis is a condition specific to the unique human anatomical characteristic of LL [21] and a common cause of back pain in adolescents [22,23]. Accumulating evidence indicates that greater lordosis angle is a risk factor for developing spondylolysis and ventral slippage of the affected vertebra [24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34]. However, the degree to which LL is associated with low back pain has been a matter of considerable debate [35]. While some studies suggest that patients with chronic low back pain have increased LL compared to controls [36,37], others found no such relation [38,39,40,41]. Studies are needed to establish whether variations in vertebral cross-sectional growth influence the susceptibility for low back pain, spondylolysis, and spondylolisthesis.

This study has other notable limitations, including LL measurement method and the population examined. All subjects had to be analyzed in the supine position using a uniform method of evaluation for LL; prior data has shown that LL in the upright position can be reproduced by positioning the patient supine with straightened lower extremities [42]. Additionally, our analysis was confined to healthy adolescent boys and girls, but whether our results are translatable to adult populations is unknown. Since the sexual dimorphism in vertebral size increases during puberty and is greatest at sexual and skeletal maturity when young women have ~25% smaller vertebral CSA, even after considering differences in body size [14,15,16], the strong relations between vertebral CSA and LL angle are likely translatable to adulthood.

Although we did not have direct measurements of spine flexibility for the children, studies suggest a positive correlation between the degree of LL and lumbar spinal motion [43,44]. We propose that the relationship between smaller vertebral CSA and increased LL is mediated by increased spinal flexibility [17], though the relationship may also be affected by other factors such as loading in the lumbar region. We also acknowledge that we did not control for other potential determinants of lumbar lordosis and flexibility, such as intervertebral disc and apophyseal morphology, paraspinous musculature, and ligamentous support. These anatomical traits are difficult to assess and/or have a great range in variability, even within the same individual [45,46].

In conclusion, understanding sexual dimorphisms is relevant to many fields of medicine and must also be considered in this discussion of lumbar lordosis. Upright posture presents a unique set of challenges to the pregnant female spine. The current study provides new evidence that vertebral CSA is a structural determinant of LL, and that the greater degree of LL in females could, at least in part, be due to smaller vertebral cross-sectional dimensions. Studies are needed to corroborate and establish the generalizability of our results in other populations, and to explore the potential relations between vertebral CSA and low back pain and spinal conditions known to be associated with increased LL, such as spondylolysis.

Supporting information

S1 Table. Ages, anthropometric characteristics, and MRI measures of vertebral morphology and degree of lumbar lordosis included in the analyses.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0172844.s001

(XLSX)

Author Contributions

  1. Conceptualization: TALW SP VG.
  2. Formal analysis: PCA EP TAC SP VG.
  3. Methodology: TALW SP VG.
  4. Writing – original draft: TALW VG.
  5. Writing – review & editing: TALW PCA EP TAC SP VG.

References

  1. 1. Shefi S, Soudack M, Konen E, Been E (2013) Development of the lumbar lordotic curvature in children from age 2 to 20 years. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 38: E602–608.
  2. 2. Dolphens M, Cagnie B, Vleeming A, Vanderstraeten G, Danneels L (2013) Gender differences in sagittal standing alignment before pubertal peak growth: the importance of subclassification and implications for spinopelvic loading. J Anat 223: 629–640. pmid:24107185
  3. 3. Middleditch A, Oliver J (2005) Structure of the Vertebral Column. In: Middleditch A, Oliver J, editors. Functional Anatomy of the Spine: Butterworth Heinemann. pp. 1–62.
    • 4. Nissinen M (1995) Spinal posture during pubertal growth. Acta Paediatr 84: 308–312. pmid:7780254
    • 5. Fernand R, Fox DE (1985) Evaluation of lumbar lordosis. A prospective and retrospective study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 10: 799–803.
    • 6. Smith AJ, O'Sullivan PB, Beales DJ, de Klerk N, Straker LM (2011) Trajectories of childhood body mass index are associated with adolescent sagittal standing posture. Int J Pediatr Obes 6: e97–106. pmid:21114456
    • 7. Jensen RK, Doucet S, Treitz T (1996) Changes in segment mass and mass distribution during pregnancy. J Biomech 29: 251–256. pmid:8849820
    • 8. Letafatkar K, Hadadnezhad M, Asrashpour H, Heris MB (2010) Effects of weight, gender and number of pregnancies on lumbar total and segmental lordosis and low back pain. J Res Rehab Sci North America 4.
    • 9. Masharawi Y, Dar G, Peleg S, Steinberg N, Medlej B, et al. (2010) A morphological adaptation of the thoracic and lumbar vertebrae to lumbar hyperlordosis in young and adult females. Eur Spine J 19: 768–773. pmid:20033740
    • 10. Hay O, Dar G, Abbas J, Stein D, May H, et al. (2015) The Lumbar Lordosis in Males and Females, Revisited. PLoS One 10: e0133685. pmid:26301782
    • 11. Masharawi Y, Rothschild B, Dar G, Peleg S, Robinson D, et al. (2004) Facet orientation in the thoracolumbar spine: three-dimensional anatomic and biomechanical analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 29: 1755–1763.
    • 12. Whitcome KK, Shapiro LJ, Lieberman DE (2007) Fetal load and the evolution of lumbar lordosis in bipedal hominins. Nature 450: 1075–1078. pmid:18075592
    • 13. Ponrartana S, Aggabao PC, Dharmavaram NL, Fisher CL, Friedlich P, et al. (2015) Sexual dimorphism in newborn vertebrae and its potential implications. J Pediatr 167: 416–421. pmid:26028289
    • 14. Arfai K, Pitukcheewanont PD, Goran MI, Tavare CJ, Heller L, et al. (2002) Bone, muscle, and fat: sex-related differences in prepubertal children. Radiology 224: 338–344. pmid:12147825
    • 15. Gilsanz V, Boechat MI, Roe TF, Loro ML, Sayre JW, et al. (1994) Gender differences in vertebral body sizes in children and adolescents. Radiology 190: 673–677. pmid:8115609
    • 16. Gilsanz V, Boechat MI, Gilsanz R, Loro ML, Roe TF, et al. (1994) Gender differences in vertebral sizes in adults: biomechanical implications. Radiology 190: 678–682. pmid:8115610
    • 17. Middleditch A, Oliver J (2005) Normal Movement. In: Middleditch A, Oliver J, editors. Functional Anatomy of the Spine. 2nd ed: Butterworth Heinemann. pp. 173–208.
      • 18. Styne DM, Grumbach MM (2016) Physiology and Disorders of Puberty. In: Melmed S, Polonsky KS, Larsen PR, Kronenberg HM, editors. Williams Textbook of Endocrinology. 13th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier. pp. 1074–1218.
        • 19. Hong JY, Suh SW, Modi HN, Hur CY, Song HR, et al. (2010) Reliability analysis for radiographic measures of lumbar lordosis in adult scoliosis: a case-control study comparing 6 methods. Eur Spine J 19: 1551–1557. pmid:20437183
        • 20. Ponrartana S, Fisher CL, Aggabao PC, Chavez TA, Broom AM, et al. (2016) Small vertebral cross-sectional area and tall intervertebral disc in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Pediatr Radiol 46: 1424–1429. pmid:27183842
        • 21. Ward CV, Latimer B (2005) Human evolution and the development of spondylolysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 30: 1808–1814.
        • 22. Nitta A, Sakai T, Goda Y, Takata Y, Higashino K, et al. (2016) Prevalence of Symptomatic Lumbar Spondylolysis in Pediatric Patients. Orthopedics 39: e434–437. pmid:27064777
        • 23. Schroeder GD, LaBella CR, Mendoza M, Daley EL, Savage JW, et al. (2016) The role of intense athletic activity on structural lumbar abnormalities in adolescent patients with symptomatic low back pain. Eur Spine J.
        • 24. Huang KY, Lin RM, Lee YL, Li JD (2009) Factors affecting disability and physical function in degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis of L4-5: evaluation with axially loaded MRI. Eur Spine J 18: 1851–1857. pmid:19526378
        • 25. Been E, Li L, Hunter DJ, Kalichman L (2011) Geometry of the vertebral bodies and the intervertebral discs in lumbar segments adjacent to spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis: pilot study. Eur Spine J 20: 1159–1165. pmid:21181481
        • 26. Chen IR, Wei TS (2009) Disc height and lumbar index as independent predictors of degenerative spondylolisthesis in middle-aged women with low back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34: 1402–1409.
        • 27. Schuller S, Charles YP, Steib JP (2010) Sagittal spinopelvic alignment and body mass index in patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis. Eur Spine J 20: 713–719. pmid:21116661
        • 28. Vialle R, Ilharreborde B, Dauzac C, Lenoir T, Rillardon L, et al. (2007) Is there a sagittal imbalance of the spine in isthmic spondylolisthesis? A correlation study. Eur Spine J 16: 1641–1649. pmid:17437136
        • 29. Jacobsen S, Sonne-Holm S, Rovsing H, Monrad H, Gebuhr P (2007) Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: an epidemiological perspective: the Copenhagen Osteoarthritis Study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 32: 120–125.
        • 30. Mehta VA, Amin A, Omeis I, Gokaslan ZL, Gottfried ON (2015) Implications of spinopelvic alignment for the spine surgeon. Neurosurgery 76 Suppl 1: S42–56; discussion S56. pmid:28171620
        • 31. Jackson RP, Phipps T, Hales C, Surber J (2003) Pelvic lordosis and alignment in spondylolisthesis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 28: 151–160.
        • 32. Chung SB, Lee S, Kim H, Lee SH, Kim ES, et al. (2012) Significance of interfacet distance, facet joint orientation, and lumbar lordosis in spondylolysis. Clin Anat 25: 391–397. pmid:21815218
        • 33. Oh YM, Choi HY, Eun JP (2013) The Comparison of Sagittal Spinopelvic Parameters between Young Adult Patients with L5 Spondylolysis and Age-Matched Control Group. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 54: 207–210. pmid:24278649
        • 34. Ferrero E, Ould-Slimane M, Gille O, Guigui P (2015) Sagittal spinopelvic alignment in 654 degenerative spondylolisthesis. Eur Spine J 24: 1219–1227. pmid:25652553
        • 35. Christensen ST, Hartvigsen J (2008) Spinal curves and health: a systematic critical review of the epidemiological literature dealing with associations between sagittal spinal curves and health. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 31: 690–714. pmid:19028253
        • 36. Christie HJ, Kumar S, Warren SA (1995) Postural aberrations in low back pain. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 76: 218–224. pmid:7717811
        • 37. Jackson DW, Wiltse LL, Dingeman RD, Hayes M (1981) Stress reactions involving the pars interarticularis in young athletes. Am J Sports Med 9: 304–312. pmid:6269444
        • 38. Hansson T, Bigos S, Beecher P, Wortley M (1985) The lumbar lordosis in acute and chronic low-back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 10: 154–155.
        • 39. Tuzun C, Yorulmaz I, Cindas A, Vatan S (1999) Low back pain and posture. Clin Rheumatol 18: 308–312. pmid:10468171
        • 40. Nourbakhsh MR, Arab AM (2002) Relationship between mechanical factors and incidence of low back pain. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 32: 447–460. pmid:12322811
        • 41. Murrie VL, Dixon AK, Hollingworth W, Wilson H, Doyle TA (2003) Lumbar lordosis: study of patients with and without low back pain. Clin Anat 16: 144–147. pmid:12589669
        • 42. Andreasen ML, Langhoff L, Jensen TS, Albert HB (2007) Reproduction of the lumbar lordosis: a comparison of standing radiographs versus supine magnetic resonance imaging obtained with straightened lower extremities. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 30: 26–30. pmid:17224352
        • 43. Coates JE, McGregor AH, Beith ID, Hughes SP (2001) The influence of initial resting posture on range of motion of the lumbar spine. Man Ther 6: 139–144. pmid:11527453
        • 44. Been E, Kalichman L (2014) Lumbar lordosis. Spine J 14: 87–97. pmid:24095099
        • 45. Middleditch A, Oliver J (2005) Intervertebral Discs. Functional Anatomy of the Spine. Second ed: Buttonworth Heinmann. pp. 63–86.
          • 46. Leone A, Guglielmi G, Cassar-Pullicino VN, Bonomo L (2007) Lumbar intervertebral instability: a review. Radiology 245: 62–77. pmid:17885181