Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Health-related quality of life among military HIV patients on antiretroviral therapy

  • Leonard Emuren ,

    leoemuren@yahoo.com

    Affiliations Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Dornsife School of Public Health, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America, Public Health Program, South University, Virginia Beach, VA, United States of America

  • Seth Welles,

    Affiliation Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Dornsife School of Public Health, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America

  • Alison A. Evans,

    Affiliation Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Dornsife School of Public Health, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America

  • Marcia Polansky,

    Affiliation Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Dornsife School of Public Health, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America

  • Jason F. Okulicz,

    Affiliations Infectious Disease Clinical Research Program, Department of Preventive Medicine and Biostatistics, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, United States of America, Infectious Disease Service, San Antonio Military Medical Center, San Antonio, TX, United States of America

  • Grace Macalino,

    Affiliations Infectious Disease Clinical Research Program, Department of Preventive Medicine and Biostatistics, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, United States of America, Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, Inc., Bethesda, MD, United States of America

  • Brian K. Agan,

    Affiliations Infectious Disease Clinical Research Program, Department of Preventive Medicine and Biostatistics, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, United States of America, Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, Inc., Bethesda, MD, United States of America

  • the Infectious Disease Clinical Research Program HIV Working Group

    Individual members and their affiliations are listed in the Acknowledgments

    Affiliation Infectious Disease Clinical Research Program, Department of Preventive Medicine and Biostatistics, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, United States of America

Abstract

Objective

The aims of this study were: (i) to determine the factors associated with HRQOL at baseline in our cohort, and (ii) to evaluate if there are differences in baseline HRQOL measures by antiretroviral treatment.

Methods

The Short Form 36 (SF-36) was administered between 2006 and 2010 among members of the United States HIV Natural History Study cohort (NHS), and participants who completed the SF-36 were included in the study. Physical component summary (PCS) and mental component summary (MCS) scores were computed based on standard algorithms. Multivariate linear regression models were constructed for PCS and MCS to estimate the association between selected variables and HRQOL scores.

Results

Antiretroviral therapy (ART) was not independently associated with HRQOL scores. Factors associated with PCS were CD4+ count < 200 cells/mm3 (β = -5.84, 95% CI: -7.63, -4.06), mental comorbidity (β = -2.82, 95% CI: -3.79, -1.85), medical comorbidity (β = -2.51, 95% CI: -3.75, -1.27), AIDS diagnosis (β = -2.38, 95% CI: -3.79, -0.98). Others were gender, military rank, marital status, and age. Factors independently associated with MCS were CD4+ count < 200 cells/mm3 (β = -1.93, 95% CI: -3.85, -0.02), mental comorbidity (β = -6.25, 95% CI: -7.25, -5.25), age (β = 0.37, 95% CI: 0.14, 0.60), and being African American (β = 1.55, 95% CI: 0.63, 2.47).

Conclusion

Among military active duty and beneficiaries with HIV, modifiable factors associated with HRQOL measures included advanced HIV disease, and mental or medical comorbidity. Addressing these factors may improve quality of life of HIV-infected individuals in the NHS cohort.

Introduction and background

The annual estimated rate of new human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infections in the United States between 2008 and 2011 remained stable at 15.8 per 100,000 while the rate for HIV stage 3 or acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS) was 10.3 per 100,000 during the same period[1]. Death from HIV/AIDS has continued to decline since the mid-1990s with the introduction of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART)[2, 3]. By 2010, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) estimated that the all-cause mortality in people infected with HIV in the United States was 6.3 per 100,000 and the all-cause mortality in those with a diagnosis of AIDS was 5.0 per 100,000[1]. Given the stable incidence of HIV/AIDS in the US and the declining mortality among infected individuals, greater emphasis is now being placed on other end-point measures both in clinical and public health settings, such as health-related quality of life (HRQOL), in assessing the well-being of individuals living with HIV/AIDS[4, 5].

HRQOL is a multidimensional and dynamic concept that is well recognized as an end-point in assessing the well-being of individuals living with HIV/AIDS[59]. Several factors have been established as determinants of HRQOL in HIV-infected populations but these determinants are partly influenced by the population studied, the HRQOL instrument used and the country of study among other factors[10, 11]. Some determinants of HRQOL in HIV-infected individuals in the United States and other high-income countries[12] are age[13, 14], race/ethnicity[13], gender[7, 8, 12, 15], educational level[13], income level[13, 14], socioeconomic status[16], access to health insurance[17], being on antiretroviral therapy[9, 10], injection drug use[18], the presence of mental and medical comorbidities[14, 19], presence of AIDS-defining illnesses[13, 20], CD4+ cell count[13, 21], plasma viral load (pVL)[21], and less frequently captured variables such as coping style/ability[17, 22, 23] and social support[22] among others. Marital status has also been shown to be associated with HRQOL in a large representative sample of the U.S. military[24].

The relationship between HIV/AIDS, HAART and HRQOL is complex. While HAART helps to prevent disease progression and results in better quality of life and well-being in HIV-infected individuals, the prolonged use of medication that is necessary to continually keep viral suppression below detection levels may lead to adverse effects that may reduce an individual’s HRQOL. Such side effects of HAART, including lipodystrophy, diarrhea and other medication-related symptoms, have also been shown to affect HRQOL[2527]. Although, side effects are not specific to one class of HAART medications, protease inhibitors have been implicated as having greater adverse effects including morphological changes and metabolic disturbances[28]. However, most studies evaluating the impact of different HAART regimen on HRQOL have been in clinical trials[10, 2932] or following a switch from protease inhibitor-based regimens to non-protease-inhibitor regimens without the benefit of an appropriate control group[28].

Some predictors of HRQOL in HIV-infected individuals in the general US population, such as lack of access to healthcare due to lack of insurance, access to and maintenance of antiretroviral medications, and injection drug use may not play an equally important role as determinants of HRQOL of HIV-infected individuals in the United States Military. HRQOL has not been previously evaluated in the U.S. Military HIV Natural History Study (NHS), which is one of the oldest open-enrollment dynamic HIV cohorts in the country and provides a unique opportunity to evaluate HRQOL in the setting of equal access to healthcare. Furthermore, racial diversity and equal access to medication are other advantages of our cohort. Also, previous study in the military shows that injection drug use is rare among military personnel[33, 34]. The aims of this study were therefore: (i) to determine the factors associated with HRQOL at baseline in the U.S. military cohort, and (ii) to evaluate if there are differences in HRQOL scores by treatment group.

Methods

The U.S. Military HIV Natural History Study has been approved centrally by the Uniformed Services University Institutional Review Board (IRB) and at each participating site and is conducted according to the principles expressed in the Declaration of Helsinki. Written informed consent was obtained from the participants. This analysis was approved by the central IRB and Drexel University.

Study cohort

The NHS is a prospective multicenter continuous enrollment observational cohort of HIV-infected active duty military personnel and other beneficiaries (spouses, adult dependents, and retired military personnel) from the Army, Navy/Marines and Air Force enrolled since 1986[33, 3537]. Participants are followed at six medical centers in the United States. Demographic data are collected at baseline and updated while medical and medication histories and standard laboratory studies are collected biannually. Blood samples obtained from participants in this cohort from scheduled visits are stored in a repository. All NHS participants provided informed consent, and approval for this research was obtained from the institutional review board at each participating site.

Study participants

The RAND Short Form 36 (SF-36) questionnaires were administered annually to NHS participants from April 2006 to September 2010. However, a few participants had more than one completed questionnaire in a year, and for these participants the last completed questionnaire for that year was used. Baseline was defined as the first ever HRQOL measure irrespective of when the participant was first enrolled in the NHS.

Definitions and variable selections

Variable selection was based on the literature on HRQOL in HIV-infected individuals in the United States and other high income countries[5, 10], on HRQOL in the US Military[24] and on variables captured in our cohort[3336].

Health-related quality of life scores.

We computed the norm-based physical (PCS) and mental (MCS) component summary scores from the eight health domains in the Short Form 36 (SF-36) questionnaire in line with the recommended scoring algorithm for the RAND 36-item health survey 1.0[38, 39]. The PCS and MCS scores were the outcome variables in our analyses. We have reported only the summary scores here for ease of interpretation of results and for comparison with other studies.

HAART definition.

HAART was defined as a combination of at least three full dose antiretroviral agents similar to previous investigations for this cohort[33]. HAART treatment was the main explanatory variable. HAART was divided into four groups: protease inhibitor-based HAART (PI-HAART), for HAART with at least one protease inhibitor in the HAART regimen; non-protease-inhibitor-based HAART (NPI-HAART), for HAART with no protease inhibitor in the HAART regimen; HAART-naïve group (HAART-N) for those who had never been on HAART prior to completing the HRQOL survey; and, OFF-HAART group made up of participants who were not on HAART at the time of completing the survey but had prior use of HAART.

Covariates.

Covariates considered for inclusion in our models were based on previous studies as well as on the demographic and clinical characteristics that were captured in the NHS cohort. These covariates included gender (male/female), age, military rank (officer/warrant officer, enlisted and civilian/retired), marital status (married, not married), race/ethnicity (non-Hispanic white, non-Hispanic African-American, and others), pVL (>50 copies/mL or ≤50 copies/mL), CD4+ cell count (<200 cells/mm3, 200–499 cells/mm3 and >499 cells/mm3), medical comorbidity, mental comorbidity, AIDS-defining illnesses (1993 CDC criteria), HIV duration, and calendar year. We used the CD4+ cell count and pVL values closest in time to the HRQOL measure used. Although most of the participants were not new to the NHS, administration of the HRQOL questionnaire began in 2006 and continued until 2010. We therefore included calendar year to adjust for any temporal variations in participants’ characteristics upon entry into the HRQOL study. Medical comorbidity referred to concurrent chronic medical conditions such as diabetes mellitus, hypertension and cancers the participants had at the time of the study. Similarly, mental comorbidity included such conditions as major depressive disorder, general anxiety disorder, bipolar disorder and alcohol abuse. Both medical and mental comorbidities were extracted from the participants’ medical record using the central electronic health-records system of the US Military. Medical comorbidity was classified as having “no” for participants who had no medical comorbidity or “yes” for those with one or more medical comorbidity. Mental comorbidity was similarly classified.

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

All participants aged 18 years and above who completed the HRQOL survey questionnaires between 2006 and 2010 were eligible for the study. We excluded participants who had been on treatment for less than four weeks prior to taking the HRQOL survey since some of the questions in the questionnaire specifically asked for participants’ functional health in the past four weeks. We further excluded participants who were on both on PI-HAART and NPI-HAART within four weeks of taking the survey Finally, we excluded participants who were on a non-HAART antiretroviral therapy at the time of survey.

Statistical analyses

We summarized the baseline characteristics of the participants who met our inclusion criteria by four HAART groups. Proportions of participant’s characteristics were compared using Chi-square tests while the medians of the numeric variables were compared using the Kruskal-Wallis tests. Separate multivariate regression models were constructed for PCS and MCS scores. We tested the effect of covariates on participants’ PCS and MCS scores in univariate analyses, and included those which achieved a significance p-value of less than 0.05 in the final multivariate analyses. We also checked for evidence of interaction between HAART (the treatment variable), and covariates. Finally, we checked for any evidence of multi-collinearity for all covariates using the variance inflation factor (VIF). All statistical analyses were performed using SAS 9.3 [SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC].

Results

Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics by HAART group for participants with SF-36 data are displayed in Tables 1 and 2. Fig 1A and 1B show participants monthly returns of survey questionnaires from 2006 to 2010. Of the 1730 eligible participants, 24 (1.4%) on a non-HAART antiretroviral therapy were excluded. We also excluded another 38 (2.2%) who were either on HAART for less than 4 weeks prior to the survey or on both PI/NPI-HAART within 4 weeks of survey completion. Demographic characteristics with the exception of gender and marital status varied by HAART group; participants were also different on their clinical characteristics, HIV disease indicators and HRQOL measures (Tables 1 & 2). There were, however, more dramatic differences in participants who were HAART naïve compared to the other HAART groups. They were younger, more likely to be other races, less likely to be retired, had a shorter duration of HIV infection, and more likely to have higher plasma viral load copies.

thumbnail
Table 1. Baseline demographic/background characteristics.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0178953.t001

thumbnail
Table 2. Baseline HIV disease indicators and clinical data.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0178953.t002

Table 3 shows the unadjusted and adjusted analyses for the PCS scores. Factors associated with lower PCS scores were age, CD4+ cell count <200 cells/mm3, lower military rank or being civilian/retired, presence of medical and mental comorbidities, AIDS diagnosis, and being married. Being male was associated with a higher PCS score. Also, participants who were administered the HRQOL questionnaire in 2007 had a higher PCS score compared to their 2006 counterparts but there were no statistically significant differences in PCS scores for participants enrolled in 2008 to 2010 compared to their 2006 counterparts. The PCS scores of participants receiving protease inhibitors were significantly lower than those receiving non-protease inhibitors in the unadjusted model (β = -2.59, 95% Confidence Limits [95% CL]: -3.64, -1.55) but not in the adjusted model. The PCS scores of participants in the Off-HAART group were also significantly lower than those receiving non-protease inhibitors in the unadjusted model (β = -1.79, 95% CL: -3.35, -0.25) but not in the adjusted model (β = -1.11, 95% CL: -2.61, 0.38). Compared to participants receiving non-protease inhibitors, HAART-naivety was associated with a higher PCS scores by 1.99 (95% CL: 0.88, 3.11) in the unadjusted model but not in the adjusted model. Similarly, PCS scores in the PI-HAART group was significantly different from those of in the Off-HAART group and the HAART-naïve in the unadjusted model but not after adjustment (see Table 4). There were no statistically significant differences in PCS scores by pVL category and HIV duration in the adjusted model.

thumbnail
Table 3. Factors associated with physical component summary scores at baseline.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0178953.t003

thumbnail
Table 4. Unadjusted and adjusted MCS scores for HAART with PI-HAART as the referent category.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0178953.t004

Table 5 shows the unadjusted and adjusted analyses for the MCS scores. Increasing age and being African American were associated with relatively higher MCS scores. Factors independently associated with lower MCS scores were CD4+ cell count <200 cells/mm3 (β = -1.93, 95% CL: -3.35, -0.05) and mental comorbidity (β = -6.25, 95% CL: -7.25, -5.25). Plasma viral load >50 copies/mL and AIDS diagnosis were associated with lower MCS scores in the unadjusted models but not in the adjusted model. The MCS scores of participants receiving protease inhibitors were not significantly different from those of receiving non-protease inhibitors. MCS scores were 1.44 and 2.34 significantly lower for the HAART-Naïve and Off-HAART groups respectively compared to those on NPI-HAART. These differences were no longer significant after adjustment. On the other hand, the PI-HAART group did not show any differences in MCS scores before and after adjustment with the HAART-naïve and Off-HAART groups (Table 6). We did not find any evidence of multi-collinearity or significant interaction in the final multivariate models.

thumbnail
Table 5. Factors Associated with mental component summary scores at baseline.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0178953.t005

thumbnail
Table 6. Unadjusted and adjusted MCS scores for HAART with PI-HAART as the referent category.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0178953.t006

Discussion

Factors independently associated with PCS scores in our cohort were age, CD4+ cell count <200 cells/mm3, mental comorbidity, military rank, marital status, gender, medical comorbidity, AIDS diagnosis, and baseline enrollment year being 2007. Age has been reported in the literature to be negatively associated with PCS score in HIV-infected populations[14, 15, 18, 4042]. Also, Smith et al found age to be negatively associated with PCS in a non-HIV military population[24] which is consistent with our findings. The relationship between aging and HIV is complex, and how aging impacts physical functional health may be both indirect and direct. For example, both increasing age and HIV infection lead to gradual decline in immunity that may result in lower PCS scores. Furthermore, older individuals have slower immune recovery and achieve less CD4+ cell restoration with HAART[43] which may negatively impact PCS. Also, both HIV infection and aging are associated with increased medical comorbidities that could negatively impact PCS[19]. Beyond that, physical senescence associated with older age may also contribute to poorer PCS[5].

Akin to the literature, we found that CD4+ cell count <200 cells/mm3 was significantly associated with lower PCS score[13, 21, 44]. There was no significant difference in PCS scores of participants with CD4+ cell count of 200–499 cells/mm3 when compared to those with CD4+ cell count >499 cells/mm3, similar to findings by others[13, 14]. The negative impact of CD4+ cell count <200 cells/mm3 on PCS is likely attributable to the greater burden of the disease associated with CD4+ cell counts <200 cells/mm3, including the fact these individuals are more likely to have had HIV-infection for a longer period, be older and may have more associated comorbidities as was the case in our cohort (data not shown). Plasma viral load was, however, not associated with PCS similar to findings by others[14, 45, 46]. This is not entirely surprising since the effect of pVL on HRQOL may be partly explained by its effect on CD4+ cell count, and as previously noted by other investigators, CD4+ cell count is a better prognostic marker for disease progression for HIV-infected individuals on HAART[45, 46]. And in the NHS quality of life study, over 74% of the participants on HAART (Table 2) had pVL ≤50 copies/mL, a level that reflects the goal of therapy in suppressing viral activity.

The presence of medical and mental comorbidities was negatively associated with physical functional health similar to findings by others[7, 14, 19, 20, 22, 40]. Although diverse psychological comorbidities have been shown to influence HRQOL, depression, which accounted for over 60% of the psychological comorbidity in our cohort, is by far the most predictive of HRQOL[7, 14, 40]. Having ever been diagnosed with AIDS was negatively associated with PCS in our cohort similar to findings by others[13, 40, 47]. The median time since their last AIDS diagnosis in our cohort was 8 years (IQR: 2–12 years), and only 12 participants (6.12% of all those with AIDS at baseline) had a recent AIDS diagnosis in the one year preceding enrollment into the study. In sensitivity analyses, we did not find any differences in the results when we excluded these participants with a recent AIDS diagnosis.

We found that being male was significantly associated with a 2.2 point higher PCS score compared to being female in our cohort, a finding similar to what has been reported in the literature[7, 8, 12, 15, 48] including the US Military[24]. Summary score levels of 2 to 3 are considered clinically and socially relevant[24, 49], and it has been suggested that women are more likely to report their poor physical state than men because society expects men to adopt a more enduring attitude[5, 12, 50]. Also, women with HIV may face a number of gender inequalities that may exacerbate clinical disease[48], although it is doubtful if this may apply to the NHS cohort. Being civilian was associated with over a 3 point lower PCS score compared to being an officer which is not entirely surprising as physical fitness is a requisite condition for remaining in the military. However, it is less clear why those enlisted also have lower PCS scores compared to officers.

Being married was associated with lower PCS score in our cohort, a finding similar to that reported by Smith et al for a non-HIV military cohort[24]. Although we do not have additional data to support the association between marital status and PCS score, it is possible that being married makes participants more conscious of their physical limitations and increase their tendency to reporting those as captured in the HRQOL questionnaire. Also, those enrolled in the study in 2007 had a slightly higher PCS score compared to the 2006 enrollees. The SF-36 instrument was routinely administered from April 2006 to September 2010 (see Fig 1A and 1B). The greater majority of those who completed the questionnaire in 2006 and 2007 were already in the cohort while most those who completed the survey from 2008 onwards were new to the cohort. Because enrollment took place over a prolonged period (over four years), it was important to adjust for time (calendar year) to account for any temporal variations in enrollment, and not necessarily because Calendar Year by itself would be associated with quality of life. It is plausible that there may be differences between completing the questionnaire soon after entry into the study (a surrogate for recent HIV infection) and doing so after a few years. In our study, however, the difference in PCS scores was between 2006 and 2007, which could be an incidental finding.

Our findings indicate that there were statistically significant differences in PCS scores among HAART treatment groups in the unadjusted models (Tables 3 and 4) but not after adjustment for covariates. The differences in the unadjusted models may therefore be explained by the participants’ demographic and clinical indicators similar to the findings reported by Armon et al[17] and Preau et al[40]. Although HIV duration was negatively associated with perceived physical health in the unadjusted model, the association was no longer significant after adjusting for age and other covariates. Furthermore, age is often correlated with HIV duration as was in our cohort (correlation coefficient 0.62, p < .0001). Race/ethnicity was not associated with PCS in our cohort, which may give credence to the view that with employment, and/or equal access to healthcare, race/ethnicity is not significantly associated with PCS.

Factors independently associated with MCS scores in our cohort were age, CD4+ cell count <200 cells/mm3, mental comorbidity, and race/ethnicity. We found a positive association between increasing age and MCS in our cohort similar to that in the military[24] and in HIV-infected individuals[13]. The relationship between age and MCS is however not consistent[51], making others to conclude that mental health is less dependent on age[5]. We also found that CD4+ cell count <200 cells/mm3 was independently associated with lower MCS score similar to the findings by others[8, 17, 52] but unlike the findings by Hays et al[13], which found a positive association between lower CD4+ cell count and MCS scores. It has been suggested that because CD4+ cell count <200 cells/mm3 is associated with faster disease progression in HIV-infected individuals, this will tend to cause distress that may negatively impact MCS[8]. There was no significant association between pVL >50 copies/mL and MCS scores in the adjusted model, a finding that is similar to what others have reported[14, 45, 46]. Also, similar to findings by others[17, 53] we did not find the presence of AIDS diagnosis to be independently associated with MCS, which may further support the view that with time HIV-infected individuals may develop more effective coping strategies that could enhance their mental health[5, 22].

Mental comorbidity had a dramatic impact on mental functional health in our cohort (β: -6.25; 95% CL: -7.25, -5.25), which clearly shows the need for greater attention by both clinicians and policy makers in addressing mental health issues in this population of military personnel. The need for frequent and regular evaluation of the mental health of participants is further supported by the high prevalence of mental comorbidity in our cohort (over 25%). And as we stated earlier, depression was by far the most significant mental comorbidity in our cohort. There was no association between medical comorbidity and MCS. In our cohort, being African-American was positively associated with higher mental functional health which is similar to the findings in a non-HIV Military cohort which reported a higher MCS score among African-Americans compared to Caucasians[24]. While there may be need for further validation of this finding we are not sure if this has any clinical correlations, and is in fact below the 2 to 3 point difference in summary scores considered clinically meaningful[49]. Finally, our study showed no differences in MSC scores between NPI-HAART and PI-HAART (Tables 5 and 6) in both the unadjusted and adjusted models. Participants who were HAART-naïve or Off-HAART had statistically significant lower MCS scores compared to NPI-HHAART in the unadjusted model but not after adjustment (Table 5). On the other hand, participants on PI-HAART did not show any statistically significant differences in MCS scores compared to either the HAART-naive or Off-HAART groups even in the unadjusted model although that for the Off-HAART group was trending toward significance (p-value = 0.09).

Some of the limitations of our study include its cross-sectional nature, which may preclude conclusions on causality. Our study population was predominantly male (>90%) so generalizability to female should be applied cautiously. We also did not control for variables such as route of transmission as this was not captured at the time the surveys were administered due to the military “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” policy in place at the time[37]. It is worth noting that previous studies have, however, not found route of transmission to be independently associated with HRQOL[16, 17, 19, 40]. Finally, the use of the RAND SF-36 questionnaire, a generic HRQOL instrument, does not allow us to capture some important HIV-disease specific dimensions on quality of life such as cognitive functioning or sleep problems.

Our study had some major advantages. One, we simultaneously examined the differences in HRQOL measures in a large cohort of individuals on PI-HAART and NPI-HAART, as well as those who were HAART-naïve or Off-HAART. Because of the large sample size, we were able to adjust for many important confounding or mediating variables in our models. Our study also had a good representation of minority groups including African-Americans and Hispanics/other races. Also, the use of a norm-based generic HRQOL questionnaire (RAND SF-36) makes it easy for direct comparisons with different populations and settings including the general US population, non-HIV-infected US military population, other HIV cohorts as well as those of other chronic diseases that have used similar instruments. Finally, our models were fairly robust requiring removing only one influential observation from the PCS model and none from the MCS model.

Conclusion

In conclusion, our study showed that modifiable risk factors associated with negative physical and mental functional health were mental comorbidity and CD4+ cell count <200 cells/mm3. Medical comorbidity and AIDS were only associated with poorer physical functional health. Addressing these risk factors may help improve the physical and mental functional health status of HIV-infected individuals in the United States’ Military.

Acknowledgments

Disclaimer: The Views expressed are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official views of the Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, the NIH, or the Departments of the Army, Navy or Air Force, or the Department of Defense.

Members of the Infectious Disease Clinical Research Program HIV Working Group include the following:

Madigan Army Medical Center, Tacoma, WA: S. Chambers; COL (Ret) M. Fairchok; LTC A. Kunz; C. Schofield

National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Bethesda, MD: J. Powers; COL (Ret) E. Tramont

Naval Medical Center, Portsmouth, VA: S. Banks; CDR K. Kronmann; T. Lalani; LCDR K. St. Clair; R. Tant

Naval Medical Center, San Diego, CA: CAPT M. Bavaro; R. Deiss; A. Diem; N. Kirkland; CDR R. Maves

San Antonio Military Medical Center, San Antonio, TX: S. Merritt; T. O'Bryan; LtCol J. Okulicz; C. Rhodes; J. Wessely

Tripler Army Medical Center, Honolulu, HI: COL T. Ferguson; LTC J. Hawley-Molloy

Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD: B. Agan; M. Byrne; X. Chu; M. Glancey; G. Macalino; E. Parmelee; COL (Ret) J. Pavlin; X. Wang; S. Won; P. Wright

Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, Silver Spring, MD: S. Peel

Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD: MAJ J. Blaylock; H. Burris; C. Decker; A. Ganesan; LTC R. Ressner; D. Wallace; CAPT T. Whitman

Author Contributions

  1. Conceptualization: LE SW GM BKA.
  2. Data curation: BKA GM JFO IDCRPHIVWG.
  3. Formal analysis: LE.
  4. Funding acquisition: BKA SW.
  5. Investigation: LE SW AAE MP JFO GM BKA.
  6. Methodology: LE SW AAE MP GM BKA.
  7. Project administration: LE SW BKA IDCRPHIVWG.
  8. Resources: IDCRPHIVWG.
  9. Software: LE IDCRPHIVWG.
  10. Supervision: SW BKA.
  11. Validation: LE SW AAE MP JFO GM BKA.
  12. Visualization: LE.
  13. Writing – original draft: LE SW BKA.
  14. Writing – review & editing: LE SW AAE MP JFO GM BKA IDCRPHIVWG.

References

  1. 1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Rates of diagnoses of HIV infection among adults and adolescents, by area of residence, 2011—United States and 6 dependent areas 2011 [01/26/2015]. Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/pdf/statistics_2011_HIV_Surveillance_Report_vol_23.pdf.
  2. 2. Palella FJ Jr., Delaney KM, Moorman AC, Loveless MO, Fuhrer J, Satten GA, et al. Declining morbidity and mortality among patients with advanced human immunodeficiency virus infection. HIV Outpatient Study Investigators. The New England journal of medicine. 1998;338(13):853–60. Epub 1998/03/27. pmid:9516219
  3. 3. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). HIV surveillance—united states, 1981–2008. MMRI. 06/03/2011;60(21).
  4. 4. Murri R, Fantoni M, Del Borgo C, Visona R, Barracco A, Zambelli A, et al. Determinants of health-related quality of life in HIV-infected patients. AIDS care. 2003;15(4):581–90. Epub 2003/09/27. pmid:14509872
  5. 5. Degroote S, Vogelaers D, Vandijck DM. What determines health-related quality of life among people living with HIV: an updated review of the literature. Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique. 2014;72(1):40. Epub 2015/02/12. PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPmc4323115. pmid:25671112
  6. 6. Carrieri P, Spire B, Duran S, Katlama C, Peyramond D, Francois C, et al. Health-related quality of life after 1 year of highly active antiretroviral therapy. Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999). 2003;32(1):38–47. Epub 2003/01/07. pmid:12514412
  7. 7. Briongos Figuero LS, Bachiller Luque P, Palacios Martin T, Gonzalez Sagrado M, Eiros Bouza JM. Assessment of factors influencing health-related quality of life in HIV-infected patients. HIV medicine. 2011;12(1):22–30. Epub 2010/05/26. pmid:20497251
  8. 8. Protopopescu C, Marcellin F, Spire B, Preau M, Verdon R, Peyramond D, et al. Health-related quality of life in HIV-1-infected patients on HAART: a five-years longitudinal analysis accounting for dropout in the APROCO-COPILOTE cohort (ANRS CO-8). Quality of life research: an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation. 2007;16(4):577–91. Epub 2007/02/03. pmid:17268929
  9. 9. Jin Y, Liu Z, Wang X, Liu H, Ding G, Su Y, et al. A systematic review of cohort studies of the quality of life in HIV/AIDS patients after antiretroviral therapy. International journal of STD & AIDS. 2014;25(11):771–7. Epub 2014/03/07. pmid:24598977
  10. 10. Gakhar H, Kamali A, Holodniy M. Health-related quality of life assessment after antiretroviral therapy: a review of the literature. Drugs. 2013;73(7):651–72. Epub 2013/04/18. pmid:23591907
  11. 11. Grossman HA, Sullivan PS, Wu AW. Quality of life and HIV: current assessment tools and future directions for clinical practice. The AIDS reader. 2003;13(12):583–90, 95–7. Epub 2004/02/13. pmid:14959693
  12. 12. Rao D, Hahn EA, Cella D, Hernandez L. The health related quality of life outcomes of English and Spanish speaking persons living with HIV/AIDS from the continental United States and Puerto Rico. AIDS patient care and STDs. 2007;21(5):339–46. Epub 2007/05/24. pmid:17518526
  13. 13. Hays RD, Cunningham WE, Sherbourne CD, Wilson IB, Wu AW, Cleary PD, et al. Health-related quality of life in patients with human immunodeficiency virus infection in the United States: results from the HIV Cost and Services Utilization Study. The American journal of medicine. 2000;108(9):714–22. Epub 2000/08/05. pmid:10924648
  14. 14. Liu C, Johnson L, Ostrow D, Silvestre A, Visscher B, Jacobson LP. Predictors for lower quality of life in the HAART era among HIV-infected men. Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999). 2006;42(4):470–7. Epub 2006/07/01. pmid:16810114
  15. 15. Ruiz Perez I, Rodriguez Bano J, Lopez Ruz MA, del Arco Jimenez A, Causse Prados M, Pasquau Liano J, et al. Health-related quality of life of patients with HIV: impact of sociodemographic, clinical and psychosocial factors. Quality of life research: an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation. 2005;14(5):1301–10. Epub 2005/07/29. pmid:16047505
  16. 16. Degroote S, Vogelaers DP, Vermeir P, Mariman A, De Rick A, Van Der Gucht B, et al. Socio-economic, behavioural, (neuro)psychological and clinical determinants of HRQoL in people living with HIV in Belgium: a pilot study. Journal of the International AIDS Society. 2013;16:18643. Epub 2013/12/18. PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPmc3862978. pmid:24331754
  17. 17. Armon C, Lichtenstein K. The associations among coping, nadir CD4+ T-cell count, and non-HIV-related variables with health-related quality of life among an ambulatory HIV-positive patient population. Quality of life research: an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation. 2012;21(6):993–1003. Epub 2011/09/23. pmid:21938643
  18. 18. Fleming CA, Christiansen D, Nunes D, Heeren T, Thornton D, Horsburgh CR Jr., et al. Health-related quality of life of patients with HIV disease: impact of hepatitis C coinfection. Clinical infectious diseases: an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America. 2004;38(4):572–8. Epub 2004/02/07. pmid:14765352
  19. 19. Rodriguez-Penney AT, Iudicello JE, Riggs PK, Doyle K, Ellis RJ, Letendre SL, et al. Co-morbidities in persons infected with HIV: increased burden with older age and negative effects on health-related quality of life. AIDS patient care and STDs. 2013;27(1):5–16. Epub 2013/01/12. PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPmc3545369. pmid:23305257
  20. 20. Anis AH, Nosyk B, Sun H, Guh DP, Bansback N, Li X, et al. Quality of life of patients with advanced HIV/AIDS: measuring the impact of both AIDS-defining events and non-AIDS serious adverse events. Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999). 2009;51(5):631–9. Epub 2009/05/12. pmid:19430303
  21. 21. Call SA, Klapow JC, Stewart KE, Westfall AO, Mallinger AP, DeMasi RA, et al. Health-related quality of life and virologic outcomes in an HIV clinic. Quality of life research: an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation. 2000;9(9):977–85. Epub 2001/05/03. pmid:11332226
  22. 22. Jia H, Uphold CR, Zheng Y, Wu S, Chen GJ, Findley K, et al. A further investigation of health-related quality of life over time among men with HIV infection in the HAART era. Quality of life research: an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation. 2007;16(6):961–8. Epub 2007/05/01. pmid:17468942
  23. 23. Langius-Eklof A, Lidman K, Wredling R. Health-related quality of life in relation to sense of coherence in a Swedish group of HIV-infected patients over a two-year follow-up. AIDS patient care and STDs. 2009;23(1):59–64. Epub 2008/12/10. pmid:19063712
  24. 24. Smith TC, Zamorski M, Smith B, Riddle JR, Leardmann CA, Wells TS, et al. The physical and mental health of a large military cohort: baseline functional health status of the Millennium Cohort. BMC public health. 2007;7:340. Epub 2007/11/28. PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPmc2212642. pmid:18039387
  25. 25. Corless IB, Kirksey KM, Kemppainen J, Nicholas PK, McGibbon C, Davis SM, et al. Lipodystrophy-associated symptoms and medication adherence in HIV/AIDS. AIDS patient care and STDs. 2005;19(9):577–86. Epub 2005/09/17. pmid:16164384
  26. 26. Nicholas PK, Kirksey KM, Corless IB, Kemppainen J. Lipodystrophy and quality of life in HIV: symptom management issues. Applied nursing research: ANR. 2005;18(1):55–8. Epub 2005/04/07. pmid:15812737
  27. 27. Burgoyne RW, Tan DH. Prolongation and quality of life for HIV-infected adults treated with highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART): a balancing act. The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy. 2008;61(3):469–73. Epub 2008/01/05. pmid:18174196
  28. 28. Potard V, Chassany O, Lavignon M, Costagliola D, Spire B. Better health-related quality of life after switching from a virologically effective regimen to a regimen containing efavirenz or nevirapine. AIDS care. 2010;22(1):54–61. Epub 2010/04/15. pmid:20390481
  29. 29. Fumaz CR, Tuldra A, Ferrer MJ, Paredes R, Bonjoch A, Jou T, et al. Quality of life, emotional status, and adherence of HIV-1-infected patients treated with efavirenz versus protease inhibitor-containing regimens. Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999). 2002;29(3):244–53. Epub 2002/03/02. pmid:11873073
  30. 30. Campo RE, Cohen C, Grimm K, Shangguan T, Maa J, Seekins D. Switch from protease inhibitor- to efavirenz-based antiretroviral therapy improves quality of life, treatment satisfaction and adherence with low rates of virological failure in virologically suppressed patients. International journal of STD & AIDS. 2010;21(3):166–71. Epub 2010/03/11. pmid:20215619
  31. 31. Jayaweera D, Dejesus E, Nguyen KL, Grimm K, Butcher D, Seekins DW. Virologic suppression, treatment adherence, and improved quality of life on a once-daily efavirenz-based regimen in treatment-Naive HIV-1-infected patients over 96 weeks. HIV clinical trials. 2009;10(6):375–84. Epub 2010/02/06. pmid:20133268
  32. 32. van Leth F, Conway B, Laplume H, Martin D, Fisher M, Jelaska A, et al. Quality of life in patients treated with first-line antiretroviral therapy containing nevirapine and/or efavirenz. Antiviral therapy. 2004;9(5):721–8. Epub 2004/11/13. pmid:15535409
  33. 33. Chun HM, Roediger MP, Hullsiek KH, Thio CL, Agan BK, Bradley WP, et al. Hepatitis B virus coinfection negatively impacts HIV outcomes in HIV seroconverters. The Journal of infectious diseases. 2012;205(2):185–93. Epub 2011/12/08. PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPmc3244364. pmid:22147794
  34. 34. Brodine SK, Starkey MJ, Shaffer RA, Ito SI, Tasker SA, Barile AJ, et al. Diverse HIV-1 subtypes and clinical, laboratory and behavioral factors in a recently infected US military cohort. AIDS (London, England). 2003;17(17):2521–7. Epub 2003/11/06. pmid:14600525
  35. 35. Chun HM, Fieberg AM, Hullsiek KH, Lifson AR, Crum-Cianflone NF, Weintrob AC, et al. Epidemiology of Hepatitis B virus infection in a US cohort of HIV-infected individuals during the past 20 years. Clinical infectious diseases: an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America. 2010;50(3):426–36. Epub 2010/01/06. PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPmc2805765. pmid:20047484
  36. 36. Pelak K, Goldstein DB, Walley NM, Fellay J, Ge D, Shianna KV, et al. Host determinants of HIV-1 control in African Americans. The Journal of infectious diseases. 2010;201(8):1141–9. Epub 2010/03/09. PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPmc2838940. pmid:20205591
  37. 37. Spaulding AB, Lifson AR, Iverson ER, Ganesan A, Landrum ML, Weintrob AC, et al. Gonorrhoea or chlamydia in a U.S. military HIV-positive cohort. Sexually transmitted infections. 2012;88(4):266–71. Epub 2012/01/10. pmid:22223813
  38. 38. RAND. Scoring instructions for the 36-item short form survey (SF-36) [updated Updated 201005/5/2013.]. Available from: http://www.rand.org/health/surveys_tools/mos/mos_core_36item_scoring.html.
  39. 39. Hays RD. SAS code for scoring 36-item health survey 1.0 [9/5/2014.]. Available from: http://gim.med.ucla.edu/FacultyPages/Hays/utils/SF36/sf36.sas.
  40. 40. Preau M, Marcellin F, Carrieri MP, Lert F, Obadia Y, Spire B. Health-related quality of life in French people living with HIV in 2003: results from the national ANRS-EN12-VESPA Study. AIDS (London, England). 2007;21 Suppl 1:S19–27. Epub 2006/12/13. pmid:17159583
  41. 41. Liu C, Ostrow D, Detels R, Hu Z, Johnson L, Kingsley L, et al. Impacts of HIV infection and HAART use on quality of life. Quality of life research: an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation. 2006;15(6):941–9. Epub 2006/08/11. pmid:16900275
  42. 42. Kowal J, Overduin LY, Balfour L, Tasca GA, Corace K, Cameron DW. The role of psychological and behavioral variables in quality of life and the experience of bodily pain among persons living with HIV. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2008;36(3):247–58. Epub 2008/04/16. pmid:18411016
  43. 43. Effros RB, Fletcher CV, Gebo K, Halter JB, Hazzard WR, Horne FM, et al. Aging and infectious diseases: workshop on HIV infection and aging: what is known and future research directions. Clinical infectious diseases: an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America. 2008;47(4):542–53. Epub 2008/07/17. PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3130308. pmid:18627268
  44. 44. Gill CJ, Griffith JL, Jacobson D, Skinner S, Gorbach SL, Wilson IB. Relationship of HIV viral loads, CD4 counts, and HAART use to health-related quality of life. Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999). 2002;30(5):485–92. Epub 2002/08/03. pmid:12154339
  45. 45. Anastos K, Barron Y, Cohen MH, Greenblatt RM, Minkoff H, Levine A, et al. The prognostic importance of changes in CD4+ cell count and HIV-1 RNA level in women after initiating highly active antiretroviral therapy. Annals of internal medicine. 2004;140(4):256–64. Epub 2004/02/19. pmid:14970148
  46. 46. Tarwater PM, Gallant JE, Mellors JW, Gore ME, Phair JP, Detels R, et al. Prognostic value of plasma HIV RNA among highly active antiretroviral therapy users. AIDS (London, England). 2004;18(18):2419–23. Epub 2004/12/29. pmid:15622318
  47. 47. Rueda S, Raboud J, Mustard C, Bayoumi A, Lavis JN, Rourke SB. Employment status is associated with both physical and mental health quality of life in people living with HIV. AIDS care. 2011;23(4):435–43. Epub 2011/01/29. pmid:21271396
  48. 48. Lifson AR, Grandits GA, Gardner EM, Wolff MJ, Pulik P, Williams I, et al. Quality of life assessment among HIV-positive persons entering the INSIGHT Strategic Timing of AntiRetroviral Treatment (START) trial. HIV medicine. 2015;16 Suppl 1:88–96. Epub 2015/02/26. PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4341945. pmid:25711327
  49. 49. Hopman WM, Berger C, Joseph L, Towheed T, Prior JC, Anastassiades T, et al. Health-related quality of life in Canadian adolescents and young adults: normative data using the SF-36. Can J Public Health. 2009;100(6):449–52. Epub 2010/03/10. pmid:20209739
  50. 50. Mrus JM, Williams PL, Tsevat J, Cohn SE, Wu AW. Gender differences in health-related quality of life in patients with HIV/AIDS. Quality of life research: an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation. 2005;14(2):479–91. Epub 2005/05/17. pmid:15892437
  51. 51. Gibson K, Rueda S, Rourke SB, Bekele T, Gardner S, Fenta H, et al. Mastery and coping moderate the negative effect of acute and chronic stressors on mental health-related quality of life in HIV. AIDS patient care and STDs. 2011;25(6):371–81. Epub 2011/04/16. pmid:21492004
  52. 52. Preau M, Protopopescu C, Spire B, Sobel A, Dellamonica P, Moatti JP, et al. Health related quality of life among both current and former injection drug users who are HIV-infected. Drug and alcohol dependence. 2007;86(2–3):175–82. Epub 2006/08/26. pmid:16930864
  53. 53. Zinkernagel C, Taffe P, Rickenbach M, Amiet R, Ledergerber B, Volkart AC, et al. Importance of mental health assessment in HIV-infected outpatients. Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999). 2001;28(3):240–9. Epub 2001/11/06. pmid:11694830