http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7688-4621
Figures
Abstract
Placentas from gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) are often hypervascularized; however, participation of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and its receptors in this placental adaptation is unclear. We aimed to test whether changes in phosphorylation of tyrosine 951 or tyrosine 1175 (pY951 or pY1175) of the vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 (KDR) are associated with the proangiogenic state observed in placentas from GDM. We obtained placental samples from women with normal pregnancies (n = 24) or GDM (n = 18). We measured the relative expression of markers for endothelial cell number (CD31, CD34), VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 1 (Flt-1), KDR, pY951 and pY1175 of KDR in placental homogenate. Immunohistochemistry of placental blood vessels were performed using CD34. Proliferation and migration of human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVEC) obtained from normal pregnancy and GDM were determined in absence or presence of conditioned medium (CM) harvested from GDM or normoglycemic HUVEC cultures. GDM was associated with more CD31 and CD34 protein compared to normal pregnancy. High number, but reduced area of placental blood vessels was found in GDM. Reduced Flt-1 levels (mRNA and protein) are associated with reduced KDR mRNA, but higher KDR protein levels in placentas from GDM. No significant changes in Y951-or Y1175-phosphorylation of KDR in placentas from GDM were found. GDM did not alter proliferation of HUVECs, but enhanced migration. Conditioned medium harvested from GDM HUVEC cultures enhanced KDR protein amount, tube formation capacity and cell migration in HUVEC isolated from normoglycemic pregnancies. The data indicate that GDM is associated with reduced expression of Flt-1 but high pro-migratory activation of KDR reflecting a proangiogenic state in GDM.
Citation: Troncoso F, Acurio J, Herlitz K, Aguayo C, Bertoglia P, Guzman-Gutierrez E, et al. (2017) Gestational diabetes mellitus is associated with increased pro-migratory activation of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 and reduced expression of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 1. PLoS ONE 12(8): e0182509. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0182509
Editor: Maria Cristina Vinci, Centro Cardiologico Monzino, ITALY
Received: April 20, 2017; Accepted: July 19, 2017; Published: August 17, 2017
Copyright: © 2017 Troncoso et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Data Availability: All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.
Funding: This study was financially supported by Fondecyt Regular 1140586, Fondequip EQM140104, DIUBB GI153109/EF. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Abbreviations: GDM, Gestational diabetes mellitus; VEGF, Vascular endothelial growth factor; Flt-1, vascular endothelial growth factor receptor type 1; KDR, vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2; Y951, Tyrosine 951; Y1175, Tyrosine 1175; p, phosphorylation; CM, conditioned medium
Introduction
Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) affects at least 1 in 10 pregnant woman worldwide [1, 2] and accounts for a range of adverse perinatal outcomes including, among others, excessive fetal fat accretion (‘macrosomia’), fetal hypoglycemia, requirement of neonatal intensive care and neonatal mortality [2–5]. In addition, GDM causes not only short-term complications in the newborn, but is also associated with an elevated risk for chronic conditions such as cardiovascular disease, obesity and diabetes [6, 7].
The placenta is an essential organ for fetal growth and development. It mounts adaptive responses to changes in the intrauterine environment, which occur during normal and also pathological pregnancies [8]. Indeed, compared to normal pregnancies, placentas from GDM exhibit enhanced vascularization [9, 10]. This may appear counterintuitive in a situation of maternal nutritional oversupply, but reflects the increased oxygen demand of the fetus, because of the insulin-stimulated enhanced fetal aerobic metabolism [10]. The mechanisms underlying enhanced angiogenesis have not been fully elucidated.
Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is one of the main regulators of angiogenesis [11, 12]. It activates the three tyrosine kinase receptors VEGF receptor 1 (VEGFR1 or Fms-like tyrosine kinase 1, Flt-1), VEGFR2 (or kinase insert domain receptor, KDR) and VEGFR3 [13, 14]. Of these VEGFR-1/Flt-1 and VEGFR-2/KDR are expressed most prominently in vascular endothelial cells, where Flt-1, different from KDR, has a poor kinase activity, but an elevated capacity to bind VEGF. Thus Flt-1 has been considered as a negative regulator of KDR activation during angiogenesis [11]. On the other hand, KDR has potent tyrosine kinase activity and is, therefore, regarded as main transducer of VEGF effects on angiogenesis including proliferation, migration and tube formation of endothelial cells [11, 12]. At least five major phosphorylation sites on KDR have been described, which can activate different intracellular signaling pathways [11]. Among these autophosphorylation sites, phosphorylation on tyrosine 951 (pY951) has been related to cell migration [15], while pY1175 has been mainly related to cell proliferation [11]. Therefore, identification of the sites of KDR phosphorylation may help suggest, which particular processes involved in angiogenesis are enhanced during VEGF activation.
Several studies have reported placental levels of VEGF and its receptors in GDM, but with differing results likely due to selection of patients, differences in diagnostic criteria of GDM and methodological differences [6, 16–19]. However, there are no reports regarding functional aspects of KDR in GDM, which may help to dissect the mechanisms underlying placental hypervascularization in GDM. Therefore, we hypothesize that GDM is associated with elevated placental proangiogengenic markers and changes in tyrosine phosphorylation of KDR
Patients and methods
Patients
Pregnant women, who were attended by members of the Obstetric and Gynecology Department of the Herminda Martin Clinical Hospital, Chillán, Chile, for their delivery, were included in this study. Informed consent was obtained from each participant. Placentas were collected after delivery from 24 full-term normal or 18 full-term gestational diabetic pregnancies. Women were classified as having (1) normal pregnancy (maternal blood pressure <140/90 mm Hg, basal glycaemia <90mg/dL during entire pregnancy and no medical complications), (2) Criteria for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) diagnosis, which was defined as glycaemia >90 mg/dL (i.e., overnight starvation) and >140 mg/dL at 2 hours after an oral glucose load (75 g) at 22–24 weeks of gestation [20]. Investigation was performed according to the principles expressed in the Declaration of Helsinki. The Ethical Committee of the Universidad del Bío-Bío approved this cohort study.
Sampling of placentas
Within 20 minutes after delivery, placentas were weighed and examined macroscopically to exclude clots, fibrosis, or areas of infarction. Four random full-depth samples of the placentas were then taken from each tissue as previously reported [21]. Samples were immersed in liquid nitrogen and maintained at -80°C until used for mRNA and protein extraction. The four samples were pooled for analysis.
Human umbilical vein endothelial cell (HUVEC) culture
In a subset of samples (14 each group), endothelial cells were isolated from the human umbilical vein (HUVEC) by digestion with collagenase (0.25 mg/mL) and then cultured (37°C, 5% CO2) in medium 199 (M199) as previously described [22]. All experiments were performed in duplicate, after overnight serum deprivation. Cells were used in passage 2. In culture endothelial cells develop the characteristic cobblestone phenotype [23].
In some experiments HUVEC isolated from either normal or GDM pregnancies were cultured in M199 without serum and conditioned medium (CM) was harvested after 48 hours. After collection, CM was centrifuged at 10,000 x g at 4°C for 10 minutes, sterilized by filtration through a 0.22 μm pore-size filter and maintained at -80°C until use within two weeks.
Microscopic analysis and immunocytochemistry
KDR protein was identified by immunocytochemistry in HUVEC isolated from normal pregnancies and HUVEC exposed to conditioned medium (CM) from GDM HUVEC (see above) by using a commercial kit (Vector Laboratories, MI, USA) following the manufacturer’s protocol. Briefly, after treatment HUVECs were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde prepared in phosphate buffer (PBS, (mM): NaCl 13.7, KCl 2.7, Na2HPO4 0.9, KH2PO4 1.8, pH 7.4, 4°C) for 20 minutes. After blocking unspecific binding using 5% bovine serum albumin (BSA) in blocking buffer solution (PBS/Tween 1%), the cells were incubated overnight with primary KDR antibody (Cell Signaling Technology, Boston, USA) (Clone 55B11, dilution 1:200 v/v). Antigen-antibody reaction was further revealed by HRP-conjugated secondary antibody (Vector Laboratories, MI, USA).
Images were taken by a camera and the intensity of the immunocytochemical staining was semi-quantified using ImageJ software (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD) [24]. Values are expressed as the ratio between the area of brown stain and the total area of the reference field. All samples for digital and microscopic analyses were blinded to the operator.
Western blot
Placental homogenates were prepared in an Ultra-Turrax homogenizer (Daihan Scientific, Seoul, South Korea). HUVEC mRNA and protein were extracted from primary cultures of normal and GDM pregnancies. Both extractions were prepared in lysis buffer (Tris HCL, pH 8, 20 mM; NaCl 137 mM; EDTA 2 mM; glycerol 10%, Nonidet P-40 1%) and protease inhibitor cocktail (Thermo Scientific, CA, USA). Samples were centrifuged at 14,000 x g at 4°C for 10 minutes. Proteins (70 μg) from supernatant were separated by SDS-PAGE (10%), transferred to nitrocellulose membranes, and probed with primary antibodies for CD31 (Abcam, Cambridge, UK; ab54211, dilution 1:1000 v/v), CD34 (Abcam ab8158, dilution 1:2500 v/v), VEGF (Abcam ab1316, 1:2000 v/v); Flt-1 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, TX, USA; sc-316, dilution 1:1000 v/v); KDR (Cell Signaling Technology, MA, USA; #2479, dilution 1:1000 v/v), phospho-Y951-KDR (Cell Signaling Technology; #4991, dilution 1:1000 v/v) and β-actin (Sigma-Aldrich, MO, USA; clone AC-74, dilution 1:15000 v/v). A horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody was used for visualization (rabbit, Thermo Scientific, CA, USA; mouse, Sigma-Aldrich, MO, USA). Bands on gels were scanned and images quantified by ImageJ 1.48 software (National Institute of Health, USA) as described previously [22].
Microscopic analysis and immunohistochemistry
Microscopic analysis and immunohistochemistry analysis was performed as previously describe for our group with minor modifications [21]. Briefly, paraffin-embedded tissue sections were cut into 5-mm slices to use for immunodetection of CD34 (Abcam ab8536, dilution 1:250 v/v) using a commercial kit (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA). Antigen-antibody reaction was visualized by diaminobenzidine reaction, and densitometry was performed using Image-Pro Plus software (Media Cybernetics, Rockville, MD) in two random pictures from each preparation. This approach, allowed us to count the number of blood vessels and chorionic villi. Also, we measure the area of every vessel and its corresponding villi. Values are expressed as number of vessels per villi and average area of those vessels per villi. Two different blinded observers analyzed those images.
ELISA for VEGF and KDR tyrosine phosphorylation
The PathScan Phospho-VEGFR-2 (Tyr-1175) sandwich ELISA kit (Cell signaling Technology) was used to measure tyrosine-1175 phosphorylation of KDR (pKDR) in total placental homogenate (300 μg). VEGF concentrations in conditioned culture medium (200 μg of total protein) were quantified by ELISA (R&D Systems, # DVE00). Both ELISA were performed following the manufacturer’s instructions.
Semi quantitative PCR
RNA was isolated using TRIzol® Reagent (Life Technology, CA, USA) according to the manufactures' instructions. RNA concentration was measured in MaestroNano (Maestrogen, NV, USA). An absorption ratio of 260/280nm ~2.0 was considered as high quality RNA preparation. The RNA concentration was used to standardize the amount of RNA of each sample for cDNA synthesis. Reverse transcription were performed as previously described [25], using the SV Total RNA Isolation System (Promega, Madison, WI) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
mRNA levels for Flt-1, KDR, VEGF, and 18S were assessed by semi-quantitative PCR in the linear phase of amplifaction (Multigene Gradient, Labnet, NJ, USA). Reactions in 20 μL were carried out, using PCR Master Mix with 1-μM primers, according to the manufacturer´s instructions. The primers and cycles used are described in Table 1. Products of the expected size were separated by electrophoresis on 1.5% agarose gels and visualized with ethidium bromide under UV light.
Cell proliferation and migration
Cell proliferation was analyzed in absence or presence (24 h) of conditioned medium as described above by MTS assay (Roche Diagnostics, IN, USA) following the manufacturer’s instructions.
Cell migration was analyzed also in absence or presence (8 or 24 h) of conditioned medium using wound healing assay [22]. Briefly, cells were allowed to reach confluence in growth medium, and then switched to serum-free medium prior to addition of either normal or GDM-derived conditioned medium. The monolayer was wounded with a single sterile cell scraper of constant diameter. Cells were observed at 40X magnification in a phase contrast inverted microscope (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan), and six random images were taken using digital camera (MShot MD90, Guangzhou Micro-shot Technology Co., Ltd, China) immediately after wound generation and 24 hours after treatment. Cell migration was analyzed using both cell counting and the area measurement plugin from ImageJ software. Migratory area is expressed as percentage of migration in respect of denudated area.
Where M. area denotes the migratory area. A0 is the area at time 0, or denudated area, Anh represents the area, which remained denudated after 8 or 24 hours accordingly with experimentation.
Angiogenesis assay
HUVECs (4 x104) from normal pregnancies were cultured in a 96-well plate coated with 40 μL Matrigel Basement Membrane Matrix (Corning Labware, MA, USA). Assays were performed in absence or presence (8 hours) of conditioned medium derived from GDM. Tube length was quantified using the “Angiogenesis analyzer” plugin from ImageJ software.
Statistical analysis
Groups were compared by non-parametric analysis (Mann-Whitney test). Values are presented as median and interquartile range, or media ± S.E.M. as appropriate. P<0.05 is considered statistically significant. GraphPad Prism 5.00 (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA) was used for data and statistical analysis.
Results
Clinical characteristics
Forty-two pregnant women were included in the study, 24 with a normal pregnancy and 18 women with GDM (Table 2). The GDM women had higher weight, BMI in the first trimester (9 ± 1 weeks), and weight gain than non-GDM women. In addition, the number of prenatal care visit for clinical evaluation was higher (p<0.05) in women with GDM compared to controls. There were no significant differences in other clinical parameters including gestational age at delivery, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, and rate of cesarean section or newborn’s anthropometry. Placentas from GDM were heavier (P = 0.01) than those from normal pregnancy by about 100 grams. Ratio of newborn weight to placental weight was reduced (P = 0.007) in GDM compared to controls.
Protein expression of endothelial markers and VEGF
Protein levels of CD31 and CD34 (Fig 1A and 1B) in placentas from GDM were higher than those in normal pregnancy. Also, number of chorionic blood vessels (CD34 positive staining) per villi was greater in GDM than normal pregnancy (5.6 ± 0.5 vs 3.5 ± 0.3 vessels per villi, respectively, P = 0.006) (Fig 1C and 1D). However, average area of those vessels was lower in GDM than normal pregnancy (-63%, P = 0.01) (Fig 1E).
Protein levels of CD31 and CD34 in total placental homogenates of normal pregnancy (NP, white bar) and gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM, hatched bar) were determined by western blot. A) Representative western blot for CD31 (55 kDa), CD34 (80 kDa) and β-actin (43 kDa). B) Densitometric analysis of CD31/ β-actin ratio (left Y-axis) and CD34/ β-actin ratio (right Y-axis). C) Representative images of CD34 staining in placentas from Normal and GDM. D) Number of vessels per villi. E) Mean blood vessel area (MVA)/mean chorionic villi area (MCVA) ratio. In B, n = 6–12 in each group. In D and E, n = 4–5 in each group. Magnification 40X. P-value is indicated in each graph.
Placental VEGF mRNA (Fig 2A) and protein levels (Fig 2B) did not differ between GDM and controls. Furthermore, no significant changes were observed in VEGF protein levels when data was analyzed grouping normal first trimester body mass index or considering delivery mode (Fig 2C and 2D). The protein levels of CD31, CD34 or VEGF were not significantly correlated with newborn anthropometry or placental weight (data not shown).
A) mRNA levels for VEGF in total placental homogenate from normal pregnancies (Normal, white bar) or gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM, hatched bar). Values are expressed as ratio mRNAVEGF/18S obtained by densitometric analysis. B) Western blot of VEGF (55 kDa) and β-actin (43 kDa). The bottom panel shows the results of densitometric scanning expressed as VEGF/β-actin ratio. C) Post-hoc analysis of VEGF protein levels as presented in B considering maternal body mass index (BMI) in the first trimester D) or delivery mode. In A, n = 8 in each group. B, n = 14–15 in each group.
Vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 1 and 2
Compared to normal pregnancy, placentas from GDM exhibited significantly lower mRNA (-42%, Fig 3A) and protein (-59%, Fig 3B) levels of Flt-1. Differences remain significant in vaginally delivery pregnancies, but was attenuated in those delivered by cesarean section (see S1A Fig).
A) mRNA levels for Flt-1 in total placental homogenate (n = 8 in each group) from normal pregnancies (Normal, white bar) or gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM, hatched bar). Values are expressed as ratio mRNA Flt-1/18S obtained by densitometric analysis. B) Western blot of Flt-1 (210 kDa) and β-actin (43 kDa). The bottom panel shows the results of densitometric scanning expressed as Flt-1/β-actin ratio; n = 15 in each group. P-value is indicated in each graph.
Also KDR mRNA was lower (-34%, P = 0.003) (Fig 4A), while KDR protein levels were higher (Fig 4B) (1.7 fold, P = 0.02) in GDM placentas than in those from normal pregnancy, and were unaffected by mode of delivery (see S1B Fig).
A) Representative image of PCR for KDR and 18S in placental homogenates from normal (Normal, white bar) and gestational diabetic pregnancies (GDM, hatched bar). In the bottom panel is presented densitometic analysis of mRNA KDR/18S. B) Representative images of total KDR (170kDa) and tyrosine 951 phosphorylated (pY951-KDR) (70 kDa) and β-actin (43 kDa) in placenta homogenates. Chart represents densitometry of KDR/β-actin ratio and pY951-KDR/KDR. C) Optical units at 450 nm were used for estimating the relative amount of KDR phosphorylated in the Y1175 residue. Significant differences between groups are indicated with respective P value. In A and C, n = 8 in each group. In B, n = 18 in GDM, n = 20, for total KDR; while 8 per group for Y951. P-value is indicated in each graph. Outliners are indicated in gray.
Differential tyrosine phosphorylation of KDR in GDM
The ratio of Y951-phosphorylated KDR (pY951-KDR) to total KDR estimated by western blot was similar in normal and GDM placentas (Fig 4B). Similar results were obtained for Y1175-phosphorylated KDR as determined by ELISA (Fig 4C).
Cell proliferation and migration of HUVEC isolated from GDM
Proliferation (24 h, culture) did not differ between HUVEC isolated from GDM compared to those isolated from normal pregnancy (Fig 5A).
Nevertheless, significantly more migrating cells (i.e. cells crossing the gap after 24 hours) were observed in HUVEC isolated from GDM compared to normal pregnancy (Fig 5B, 20 ± 1.1 vs 15 ± 1.1 cells per field, respectively, P = 0.04).
A) Cell proliferation measured by MTS assay in HUVEC from normal (Normal, white bar) and gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM, hatched bar) pregnancies. B) Cell migration as in A. In A, n = 8–11; in B, n = 13 in each group.
Conditioned medium from cell culture of GDM promote angiogenesis in vitro
Conditioned medium (CM) harvested from HUVEC from normal (CM-NP) or GDM (CM-GDM) pregnancy exhibited similar concentration of VEGF (Fig 6A and 6B), although a tendency (P = 0.07) to higher concentrations was observed in CM-GDM than CM-NP in western blot assays (Fig 6A).
A) Estimation of VEGF concentration by western blot in conditioned medium harvested from HUVEC derived from normal (CM-NP, white bar) or GDM (CM-GDM, hatched bar). B) Quantification of VEGF in conditioned medium using ELISA as in A. C) Representative images of negative control (without primary antibody) in the immunocytochemistry for KDR identification in HUVEC isolated from normal pregnancies and exposed (8h) to either D) M199 (control medium), E) CM-NP or F) CM-GDM. G) Tube formation assay in HUVEC in presence (8h) of control medium (control), CM-NP or CM-GDM. H). Tube length quantification in the tube formation assay. Magnification 40X. All Figs represent n = 3 in each group. Significant differences are indicated with respective P value.
In parallel experiments a significant increase (2.2- and 1.8-fold, respectively) in the relative amount of KDR protein (immunocytochemistry; Fig 6C–6F) and tube length (Matrigel assay; Fig 6G and 6F) was found in HUVECs isolated from normal pregnancies exposed (8h) to CM-GDM in comparison to untreated cells.
CM-GDM induced proliferation is associated to Y951-phosphorylation of KDR
In parallel experiments cell migration was analyzed in the presence (8 h) of CM-GDM or CM-NP. HUVEC from normal pregnancy exposed to CM-GDM exhibited elevated migration than those cultured in M199 without serum (basal) or CM-NP (1.9 and 1.3 fold, respectively) (Fig 7A and 7B). This effect was abolished when CM-GDM was heat-denatured prior to use. Interestingly, HUVEC isolated from GDM did not exhibit any significant change when they were exposed to either CM-NP or CM-GDM. However, GDM cells exposed to heat-denatured CM-GDM showed reduced cell migration compared to basal condition or cell exposed to CM-GDM (-41% and -60%, respectively).
A) Cell migration (8 h) of HUVEC isolated from normal (Normal, white bar) or B) gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM, hatched bar) pregnancies exposed to conditioned medium harvested from cell cultures of either normal (CM-NP, +) or gestational diabetes mellitus (CM-GDM, +) pregnancies, or respective heat denaturized conditioned medium (heat denaturation). Representative images are available upon request. n = 4 in each group. Significant differences are indicated with respective P value. In B, line represents basal value in normal pregnancy. †P<0.05 vs HUVEC from normal pregnancy cultured in M199.
In addition, CM-NP and CM-GDM induced Y951-phosphorylation of KDR after 10 minutes incubation in HUVEC from normal pregnancy by 250% and 180%, respectively (S2B and S2C Fig), without significant changes in total KDR (S2A Fig). Y951-phosphorylation was abolished using heat-denatured CM (S2C and S2D Fig). No significant changes were observed in Y951-phosphorylation between CM-NP and CM-GDM, although a trend to higher phosphorylation was observed in CM-GDM (P = 0.4). HUVEC from GDM exposed to either CM-NP or CM-GDM exhibited no significant changes on Y951-phosphorylation. Raw data presented in this manuscript is included in S1 File.
Discussion
Collectively, the results of this study suggest that placentas from GDM pregnancies are in a proangiogenic state, since they have more endothelial cells i.e., elevated endothelial cell markers and placental blood vessels per chorionic villi, as well as higher level of total KDR than placentas from normal controls. However, we have to acknowledge that CD31 and CD34 are also present on hematopoietic progenitor cells, which may or may not contribute to hypervascularization in GDM [26]. Additional alterations associated with GDM include reduced Flt-1 expression (mRNA and protein), but no change of VEGF or KDR phosphorylation. In HUVEC no changes in proliferation markers were observed, but, interestingly, migration was higher in GDM cells than cells from normal control pregnancies. In line with this the conditioned medium harvested from GDM cell cultures enhanced the KDR amount and promoted cell migration and tube formation in HUVEC isolated from normoglycemic pregnancies after 8 hours of incubation. These results suggest that GDM is associated with high activation of KDR with ensuing overstimulation of endothelial cell migration. We speculate that this contributes to placental hypervascularization frequently observed in GDM pregnancies (see Fig 8).
Results of this study suggest that placentas from gestational diabetes mellitus are in a proangiogenic state characterized by elevated endothelial cell markers, ie. more endothelial cells, and higher KDR, resulting in enhanced migration in GDM cells than cells from normal control pregnancies. Additional alteration/compensatory mechanisms include reduction in the mRNA and protein levels of Flt-1, reduced mRNA levels of KDR, and no changes in VEGF, or cell proliferation. Changes observed in GDM are shown in red and black arrows.
In addition to placental angiogenesis, also the mean number of redundant capillary connections per terminal villus and the incidence of vascular hyperplasia (chorioangiosis) [16] is higher in GDM compared to controls suggesting a more pronounced capillary branching [27]. A hallmark of GDM is increased villous immaturity and increased measures of angiogenesis as recently reviewed by Huynh et al [9]. Our results also confirm increased placental angiogenesis in GDM.
The fetus vitally depends on adequate provision of oxygen. Fetal hyperinsulinemia in GDM stimulates fetal aerobic metabolism in GDM [28] and thus increases fetal oxygen demand. This occurs vis-a-vis elevated maternal levels of HbA1c, which has a higher affinity for oxygen than non-glycosylated HbA1. The resulting imbalance in oxygen supply and demand can lead to transient reduction of fetal oxygen levels (i.e., hypoxia), which together with elevated insulin are drivers for placental angiogenesis [29]. Thus, enhanced vascularization in GDM may represent a compensatory mechanism of the fetus to counteract permanent fetal hypoxia [30]. However, although the oxygen diffusive conductance is enhanced in GDM placentas [31], it is unclear whether placental hypervascularization in the GDM placenta is related to more oxygen delivery to the fetus. 3D-reconstruction of placental vasculature reveals that reduced vascular resistance due to high capillary sinuosity associated with capillary dilatation leads to effective oxygen uptake [32]. A different interpretation posits that a greater number of vessels in the villi can instead reduce oxygen diffusion to the fetus [21, 33].
Transient fetal hypoxia may trigger enhanced placental synthesis and release of VEGF, as well as the expression of VEGF receptors (i.e., Flt-1 and KDR) as reviewed previously by our group [6]. We have not measured cord blood VEGF concentrations in our collective, but other studies found reduced VEGF concentrations in umbilical cord blood from term fetuses born to mothers with GDM compared to healthy term fetuses [16, 18], while in placental tissue VEGF mRNA levels were not altered by GDM [17]. Our results show similar extracellular VEGF levels in CM-GDM and CM-NP.
While elevated VEGF levels do not seem to contribute to the proangiogenic state in GDM, changes at the receptor level either in the amount or activation or both may enhance VEGF effects. However, reports on VEGF receptor (i.e., Flt-1 or KDR) levels in human placentas in GDM are scant and vary between studies [17, 19, 34, 35]. Placentas from women with hyperglycemia contain high levels of VEGF and VEGF receptor 2 (KDR), but reduced expression of VEGF receptor 1 (Flt-1) compared to normoglycemic women [36]. Studies in pre-pregnancy diabetes also produced contradictory results [37–40]. This suggests that a range of unknown factors, including tissue sampling and clinical characteristics of the women, may have an effect on placental levels of VEGF and its receptors in GDM.
In the present study we have carefully considered mode of delivery and maternal pre-pregnancy BMI approximated by first trimester BMI. The results suggest that VEGF protein levels may not be significantly affected by BMI or delivery mode, whereas the GDM effect on Flt-1 protein levels depends on mode of delivery. It was significantly reduced only in women, who delivered vaginally, but not in the groups with cesarean section. Since Flt-1 has been considered as a decoy receptor of VEGF, we could speculate that reduced placental Flt-1 levels might constitute a compensatory mechanism in a proangiogenic diabetic scenario. Placental mRNA levels of Flt-1 are unchanged in GDM [17], but its soluble isoform sFlt-1 is elevated in placentas from GDM [41]. Despite these discrepancies it has been suggested that increased secretion and activity of VEGF may explain hypervascularization observed in placentas from GDM [6, 10, 16, 42]. However, the present study locates the relevant changes to the receptor level with a reduction in the expression of Flt-1, but increased KDR.
Activation of the KDR-mediated proangiogenic responses associated with phosphorylation of at least five tyrosine residues—951, 1054, 1059, 1175, and 1214 [12, 43]. Differential activation of KDR by VEGF has been previously described in endothelial cells [44]. For instance, Y951 appeared to be preferentially phosphorylated by matrix-bound VEGF, whereas Y1175 is preferentially phosphorylated by soluble VEGF [44]. In addition, the subsequent cell response depends on which site is phosphorylated. Thus, phosphorylation of Y951 of KDR has been associated with actin reorganization and cell migration [45], while phosphorylation of Y1175 leads to cell proliferation via the Src and ERK pathways [46]. This suggests that subtle differences in KDR phosphorylation at these sites might result in regulation of distinct, but different, cellular processes related to angiogenesis in GDM, similar to pre-eclamptic pregnancies [21].
Y1175-Phosphorylation of KDR was similar in placental homogenates from GDM and normal pregnancy. Importantly, HUVEC proliferation was also similar between these groups. In contrast, cell migration was higher in HUVEC from GDM than in controls. Also, HUVEC from normal pregnancies exposed to CM-GDM exhibited higher migration than cells exposed to CM-NP. The proangiogenic effect of CM-GDM was further supported by inducing (after 8 h) high KDR protein amount and tube formation in HUVEC from normal pregnancies. These results were associated with Y951-phosphorylation of KDR observed in cells exposed to CM-GDM or CM-NP, the former being slightly higher than the latter.
The angiogenic response to VEGF not only depends on its total concentration, but also on the spatial distribution and extracellular VEGF gradient [44, 47], as well as on the VEGF receptor location on the cell surface [12]. These factors lead to endothelial cell organization within vessels as tip and stalk cell phenotypes ultimately resulting in dynamic sprouting and branching angiogenesis [48]. Results showed more KDR in HUVECs from normal pregnancy exposed (8 h) to CM-GDM, associated with slight increase in Y951-phosphorylation of KDR in response to CM-GDM (10 min). Therefore, we suggest that CM-GDM induces KDR expression and/or activation leading to a higher migratory response.
We acknowledge few limitations of our study. We have tried to overcome the small cohort size by complementing ex vivo with in vitro studies. Analysis of a potential influence of newborn sex was precluded by the cohort size. Western blot analysis for Y951 residue of KDR was difficult to perform because of varying molecular size in the blots and a double band with estimated sizes of 70 kDa was clearly found. This bands at 70 kDa may represent immature forms of KDR a suggested by Takahashi and Shibuya [49]. We also did not further study KDR expression and focused on protein and functional analyses. This decision was also based on the discrepancy of KDR mRNA and protein levels i.e. lower mRNA; higher protein in GDM. Identifying the reason for these divergent KDR changes in GDM was outside the scope of our study, but likely involves microRNAs such as miR-199a-3p [50], miR-410-3p, miR-497-5p, and miR-2355-5p [51] or miR-16 [52] This warrants future studies. A regulation via microRNA would not be unexpected, since angiogenesis in general, and VEGFR expression in particular, is a dynamic process [13, 53]. Despite these limitations, this report suggests for the first time that differential activation of KDR may contribute to the proangiogenic state observed in placentas from GDM.
In conclusion, GDM features as a pro-angiogenic placental state. These results appear related to the reduced expression of Flt-1, but increased activity of KDR. Interestingly, KDR phosphorylation at Y951, but not at Y1175, was higher in placentas from GDM than normal pregnancy, suggesting a differential role for these phosphorylation sites in the underlying cellular mechanism accounting for the proangiogenic state observed in GDM. This results in stimulated cell migration rather cell proliferation. The implications of these findings to fetal well-being remain to be elucidated. Our knowledge regarding the roles of the VEGFRs is scant and warrants further studies.
Supporting information
S1 Fig. Post-hoc analysis of Flt-1 and KDR.
Protein levels of Flt-1 (A) or KDR (B) as shown in Figs 3 and 4, respectively, were analyzed considering delivery mode in normal pregnancy (Normal, white bar) and gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM, hatched bar). Data is presented as densitometry of Flt-1 or KDR/β-actin ratio. In A, P value is presented in each analysis.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0182509.s001
(TIFF)
S2 Fig. Phosphorylation of Y951 of KDR in presence of CM.
A) Representative images of total KDR (170kDa) and β-actin (43 kDa) in HUVEC isolated from normal (Normal, white bars) or gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM, hatched bars). Chart represents densitometry of KDR/β-actin ratio. B) Representative western blot of pY951 of KDR (70 kDa) in presence (5–15 min) of conditioned medium from normal (CM-NP) or GDM (CM-GDM). C) Representative images of phosphorylated Y951 of KDR (70-85kDa, pY951) and β-actin (43 kDa) in HUVEC isolated from normal or GDM. Also heat-denatured CM-NP or CM-GDM was used in parallel experiments. D) Densitometry of pY951KDR/β-actin ratio and in C. In A, C and D, n = 6 per group. In B, n = 2 per group. In D, *P<0.05 vs Basal in Normal. †P<0.05 vs HUVEC from normal pregnancy cultured in CM-NP.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0182509.s002
(TIFF)
Acknowledgments
We are deeply grateful to midwives and medical staff of the Obstetrics and Gynecology Department of Hospital Clinico Herminda Martin from Chillán, Chile. We would like to thank all research staff at the Vascular Physiology Laboratory and the Group of Investigation of Tumor Angiogenesis (GIANT) of the Universidad del Bío-Bío for their technical support. We also thanks to researchers in the GRIVAS Health group for outstanding discussion regarding results presented in this manuscript.
References
- 1. Sacks DA, Hadden DR, Maresh M, Deerochanawong C, Dyer AR, Metzger BE, et al. Frequency of gestational diabetes mellitus at collaborating centers based on IADPSG consensus panel-recommended criteria: the Hyperglycemia and Adverse Pregnancy Outcome (HAPO) Study. Diabetes Care. 2012;35(3):526–8. Epub 2012/02/23. pmid:22355019; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3322716.
- 2. Veeraswamy S, Vijayam B, Gupta VK, Kapur A. Gestational diabetes: The public health relevance and approach. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2012. Epub 2012/06/26. pmid:22726771.
- 3. Wadsack C, Desoye G, Hiden U. The feto-placental endothelium in pregnancy pathologies. Wien Med Wochenschr. 2012;162(9–10):220–4. Epub 2012/06/22. pmid:22717877.
- 4. Anna V, van der Ploeg HP, Cheung NW, Huxley RR, Bauman AE. Sociodemographic correlates of the increasing trend in prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus in a large population of women between 1995 and 2005. Diabetes Care. 2008;31(12):2288–93. Epub 2008/09/24. pmid:18809630; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2584183.
- 5. Wendland EM, Torloni MR, Falavigna M, Trujillo J, Dode MA, Campos MA, et al. Gestational diabetes and pregnancy outcomes—a systematic review of the World Health Organization (WHO) and the International Association of Diabetes in Pregnancy Study Groups (IADPSG) diagnostic criteria. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2012;12:23. Epub 2012/04/03. pmid:22462760; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3352245.
- 6.
Escudero CG, M; Acurio, J; Valenzuela, F; Sobrevia, L. The role of placenta in the fetal programming associated to gestational diabetes. 2013. In: Gestational Diabetes—Causes, Diagnosis and Treatment [Internet]. Croacia: InTeach; [135–62].
- 7. Desoye G, van Poppel M. The Feto-placental Dialogue and Diabesity. Best practice & research Clinical obstetrics & gynaecology. 2015;29(1):15–23. pmid:25225059.
- 8. Gauster M, Desoye G, Totsch M, Hiden U. The placenta and gestational diabetes mellitus. Curr Diab Rep. 2012;12(1):16–23. Epub 2011/11/22. pmid:22102097.
- 9. Huynh J, Dawson D, Roberts D, Bentley-Lewis R. A systematic review of placental pathology in maternal diabetes mellitus. Placenta. 2015;36(2):101–14. pmid:25524060.
- 10. Cvitic S, Desoye G, Hiden U. Glucose, insulin, and oxygen interplay in placental hypervascularisation in diabetes mellitus. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:145846. pmid:25258707; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4167234.
- 11. Koch S, Claesson-Welsh L. Signal transduction by vascular endothelial growth factor receptors. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2012;2(7):a006502. Epub 2012/07/05. pmid:22762016; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3385940.
- 12. Olsson AK, Dimberg A, Kreuger J, Claesson-Welsh L. VEGF receptor signalling—in control of vascular function. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2006;7(5):359–71. Epub 2006/04/25. pmid:16633338.
- 13. Shibuya M. Vascular endothelial growth factor and its receptor system: physiological functions in angiogenesis and pathological roles in various diseases. J Biochem. 2013;153(1):13–9. Epub 2012/11/23. pmid:23172303; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3528006.
- 14. Shibuya M. Differential roles of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-1 and receptor-2 in angiogenesis. J Biochem Mol Biol. 2006;39(5):469–78. Epub 2006/09/28. pmid:17002866.
- 15. Matsumoto T, Bohman S, Dixelius J, Berge T, Dimberg A, Magnusson P, et al. VEGF receptor-2 Y951 signaling and a role for the adapter molecule TSAd in tumor angiogenesis. Embo J. 2005;24(13):2342–53. Epub 2005/06/18. pmid:15962004; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC1173150.
- 16. Madazli R, Tuten A, Calay Z, Uzun H, Uludag S, Ocak V. The incidence of placental abnormalities, maternal and cord plasma malondialdehyde and vascular endothelial growth factor levels in women with gestational diabetes mellitus and nondiabetic controls. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2008;65(4):227–32. Epub 2008/01/17. pmid:18196904
- 17. Lappas M. Markers of endothelial cell dysfunction are increased in human omental adipose tissue from women with pre-existing maternal obesity and gestational diabetes. Metabolism. 2014;63(6):860–73. pmid:24684825.
- 18. Lassus P, Teramo K, Nupponen I, Markkanen H, Cederqvist K, Andersson S. Vascular endothelial growth factor and angiogenin levels during fetal development and in maternal diabetes. Biol Neonate. 2003;84(4):287–92. 73636. pmid:14593238.
- 19. Marini M, Vichi D, Toscano A, Thyrion GD, Bonaccini L, Parretti E, et al. Effect of impaired glucose tolerance during pregnancy on the expression of VEGF receptors in human placenta. Reprod Fertil Dev. 2008;20(7):789–801. pmid:18842181.
- 20. American Diabetes A. Diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care. 2011;34 Suppl 1:S62–9. pmid:21193628; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3006051.
- 21. Escudero C, Celis C, Saez T, San Martin S, Valenzuela FJ, Aguayo C, et al. Increased placental angiogenesis in late and early onset pre-eclampsia is associated with differential activation of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2. Placenta. 2014;35(3):207–15. Epub 2014/02/11. pmid:24508097.
- 22. Escudero C, Bertoglia P, Hernadez M, Celis C, Gonzalez M, Aguayo C, et al. Impaired A(2A) adenosine receptor/nitric oxide/VEGF signaling pathway in fetal endothelium during late- and early-onset preeclampsia. Purinergic Signalling. 2012. Epub 2012/11/28. pmid:23179048.
- 23. Latron Y, Alessi MC, George F, Anfosso F, Poncelet P, Juhan-Vague I. Characterization of epitheloid cells from human omentum: comparison with endothelial cells from umbilical veins. Thromb Haemost. 1991;66(3):361–7. pmid:1746009.
- 24. Rey S, Del Rio R, Iturriaga R. Contribution of endothelin-1 to the enhanced carotid body chemosensory responses induced by chronic intermittent hypoxia. Brain Res. 2006;1086(1):152–9. Epub 2006/04/06. pmid:16595126.
- 25. Fernandez P, Jara C, Aguilera V, Caviedes L, Diaz F, Radojkovic C, et al. Adenosine A(2)A and A(3) receptors are involved in the human endothelial progenitor cells migration. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 2012;59(5):397–404. Epub 2012/01/06. pmid:22217884.
- 26. Bai H, Liu Y, Xie Y, Hoyle DL, Brodsky RA, Cheng L, et al. Definitive Hematopoietic Multipotent Progenitor Cells Are Transiently Generated From Hemogenic Endothelial Cells in Human Pluripotent Stem Cells. J Cell Physiol. 2016;231(5):1065–76. pmid:26395760; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4729203.
- 27. Jirkovska M, Kubinova L, Janacek J, Moravcova M, Krejci V, Karen P. Topological properties and spatial organization of villous capillaries in normal and diabetic placentas. J Vasc Res. 2002;39(3):268–78. Epub 2002/07/05. pmid:12097825.
- 28. Desoye G, van Poppel M. The Feto-placental Dialogue and Diabesity. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2015;29(1):15–23. pmid:25225059.
- 29. Hiden U, Lang I, Ghaffari-Tabrizi N, Gauster M, Lang U, Desoye G. Insulin action on the human placental endothelium in normal and diabetic pregnancy. Curr Vasc Pharmacol. 2009;7(4):460–6. Epub 2009/06/03. pmid:19485889.
- 30. Gill JS, Salafia CM, Grebenkov D, Vvedensky DD. Modeling oxygen transport in human placental terminal villi. J Theor Biol. 2011;291:33–41. Epub 2011/10/01. pmid:21959313.
- 31. Mayhew TM, Sorensen FB, Klebe JG, Jackson MR. Oxygen diffusive conductance in placentae from control and diabetic women. Diabetologia. 1993;36(10):955–60. pmid:8243876.
- 32. Plitman Mayo R, Olsthoorn J, Charnock-Jones DS, Burton GJ, Oyen ML. Computational modeling of the structure-function relationship in human placental terminal villi. J Biomech. 2016;49(16):3780–7. pmid:28029359.
- 33. Gill JS, Salafia CM, Grebenkov D, Vvedensky DD. Modeling oxygen transport in human placental terminal villi. J Theor Biol. 2011;291:33–41. pmid:21959313.
- 34. Helske S, Vuorela P, Carpen O, Hornig C, Weich H, Halmesmaki E. Expression of vascular endothelial growth factor receptors 1, 2 and 3 in placentas from normal and complicated pregnancies. Mol Hum Reprod. 2001;7(2):205–10. Epub 2001/02/13. pmid:11160848.
- 35. Meng Q, Shao L, Luo X, Mu Y, Xu W, Gao L, et al. Expressions of VEGF-A and VEGFR-2 in placentae from GDM pregnancies. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2016;14(1):61. pmid:27645229; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC5029036.
- 36. Pietro L, Daher S, Rudge MV, Calderon IM, Damasceno DC, Sinzato YK, et al. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and VEGF-receptor expression in placenta of hyperglycemic pregnant women. Placenta. 2010;31(9):770–80. Epub 2010/08/03. pmid:20674013.
- 37. Janota J, Pomyje J, Toth D, Sosna O, Zivny J, Kuzel D, et al. Expression of angiopoietic factors in normal and type-I diabetes human placenta: a pilot study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2003;111(2):153–6. Epub 2003/11/05. pmid:14597243.
- 38. Leach L, Gray C, Staton S, Babawale MO, Gruchy A, Foster C, et al. Vascular endothelial cadherin and beta-catenin in human fetoplacental vessels of pregnancies complicated by Type 1 diabetes: associations with angiogenesis and perturbed barrier function. Diabetologia. 2004;47(4):695–709. Epub 2004/08/10. pmid:15298347.
- 39. Leach L, Taylor A, Sciota F. Vascular dysfunction in the diabetic placenta: causes and consequences. J Anat. 2009;215(1):69–76. Epub 2009/07/01. pmid:19563553; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2714640.
- 40. Dubova EA, Pavlov KA, Esayan RM, Degtyareva EI, Shestakova MV, Shchegolev AI, et al. Vascular endothelial growth factor and its receptors in the placenta of women with type 1 diabetes mellitus. Bull Exp Biol Med. 2012;152(3):367–70. Epub 2012/07/18. pmid:22803088.
- 41. El-Tarhouny SA, Almasry SM, Elfayomy AK, Baghdadi H, Habib FA. Placental growth factor and soluble Fms-like tyrosine kinase 1 in diabetic pregnancy: A possible relation to distal villous immaturity. Histol Histopathol. 2014;29(2):259–72. pmid:23939615.
- 42. Daskalakis G, Marinopoulos S, Krielesi V, Papapanagiotou A, Papantoniou N, Mesogitis S, et al. Placental pathology in women with gestational diabetes. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2008;87(4):403–7. Epub 2008/04/03. pmid:18382864.
- 43. Dellinger MT, Brekken RA. Phosphorylation of Akt and ERK1/2 is required for VEGF-A/VEGFR2-induced proliferation and migration of lymphatic endothelium. PLoS One. 2011;6(12):e28947. Epub 2011/12/17. pmid:22174934; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3236226.
- 44. Chen TT, Luque A, Lee S, Anderson SM, Segura T, Iruela-Arispe ML. Anchorage of VEGF to the extracellular matrix conveys differential signaling responses to endothelial cells. J Cell Biol. 2010;188(4):595–609. pmid:20176926; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2828913.
- 45. Sun Z, Li X, Massena S, Kutschera S, Padhan N, Gualandi L, et al. VEGFR2 induces c-Src signaling and vascular permeability in vivo via the adaptor protein TSAd. J Exp Med. 2012;209(7):1363–77. Epub 2012/06/13. pmid:22689825; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3405501.
- 46. Holmqvist K, Cross MJ, Rolny C, Hagerkvist R, Rahimi N, Matsumoto T, et al. The adaptor protein shb binds to tyrosine 1175 in vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) receptor-2 and regulates VEGF-dependent cellular migration. J Biol Chem. 2004;279(21):22267–75. Epub 2004/03/18. pmid:15026417.
- 47. Mac Gabhann F, Ji JW, Popel AS. VEGF gradients, receptor activation, and sprout guidance in resting and exercising skeletal muscle. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2007;102(2):722–34. pmid:17038488.
- 48. Eilken HM, Adams RH. Dynamics of endothelial cell behavior in sprouting angiogenesis. Current opinion in cell biology. 2010;22(5):617–25. pmid:20817428.
- 49. Takahashi T, Shibuya M. The 230 kDa mature form of KDR/Flk-1 (VEGF receptor-2) activates the PLC-gamma pathway and partially induces mitotic signals in NIH3T3 fibroblasts. Oncogene. 1997;14(17):2079–89. pmid:9160888.
- 50. Ghosh A, Dasgupta D, Ghosh A, Roychoudhury S, Kumar D, Gorain M, et al. MiRNA199a-3p suppresses tumor growth, migration, invasion and angiogenesis in hepatocellular carcinoma by targeting VEGFA, VEGFR1, VEGFR2, HGF and MMP2. Cell Death Dis. 2017;8(3):e2706. pmid:28358369; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC5386529.
- 51. Su SH, Wu CH, Chiu YL, Chang SJ, Lo HH, Liao KH, et al. Dysregulation of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor-2 by Multiple miRNAs in Endothelial Colony-Forming Cells of Coronary Artery Disease. J Vasc Res. 2017;54(1):22–32. pmid:28122380.
- 52. Yang IP, Tsai HL, Huang CW, Lu CY, Miao ZF, Chang SF, et al. High blood sugar levels significantly impact the prognosis of colorectal cancer patients through down-regulation of microRNA-16 by targeting Myb and VEGFR2. Oncotarget. 2016;7(14):18837–50. pmid:26934556; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4951333.
- 53. Carmeliet P, Ruiz de Almodovar C. VEGF ligands and receptors: implications in neurodevelopment and neurodegeneration. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2013;70(10):1763–78. Epub 2013/03/12. pmid:23475071.