http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5686-5033
Figures
Abstract
Background
Health-related quality of life (HRQOL) is an important outcome measure in patients with end-stage renal disease. HRQOL is assumed to improve with kidney transplantation and also with nocturnal hemodialysis compared to conventional hemodialysis. However, there is no evidence regarding HRQOL to support the optimal treatment choice for patients on nocturnal hemodialysis who hesitate opting for transplantation. We therefore compared HRQOL between patients who were treated with kidney transplantation or nocturnal hemodialysis for one year.
Methods
We assessed HQROL using the Kidney Disease Quality of Life–Short Form questionnaire in a cross-sectional sample of patients who were treated with kidney transplantation (n = 41) or nocturnal hemodialysis (n = 31) for one year. All patients on nocturnal hemodialysis were transplantation candidates. Using linear regression, we compared HRQOL between kidney transplantation and nocturnal hemodialysis, and adjusted for age, sex, dialysis duration, cardiovascular disease, and presence of residual urine production.
Results
At one year follow-up, mean age of the study population was 54 ±13 years, and median dialysis duration was 3.2 (IQR 2.1–5.0) years. Kidney transplantation was associated with significantly higher HRQOL on the domain “effects” compared to nocturnal hemodialysis (adjusted difference 12.0 points, 95% CI 3.9; 20.1). There were potentially clinically relevant differences between kidney transplantation and nocturnal hemodialysis on the domains “burden” (adjusted difference 11.1 points, 95% CI -2.6; 24.8), “social support” (adjusted difference 6.2, 95% CI -6.6; 19.1), and the physical composite score (adjusted difference 3.0, 95% CI -2.0; 8.1), but these were not significant.
Citation: Jansz TT, Bonenkamp AA, Boereboom FTJ, van Reekum FE, Verhaar MC, van Jaarsveld BC (2018) Health-related quality of life compared between kidney transplantation and nocturnal hemodialysis. PLoS ONE 13(9): e0204405. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0204405
Editor: Abelardo I. Aguilera, Hospital Universitario de la Princesa, SPAIN
Received: January 31, 2018; Accepted: September 7, 2018; Published: September 20, 2018
Copyright: © 2018 Jansz et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Data Availability: All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.
Funding: TJ is supported by a grant from the “Wellerdieck de Goede Foundation” with mediation from “Friends of UMC Utrecht”. The NOCTx study is supported by unrestricted grants from Amgen, Baxter, Fresenius Medical Care, Novartis, Roche and Shire Pharmaceuticals. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing interests: The NOCTx study is supported by unrestricted grants from Amgen, Baxter, Fresenius Medical Care, Novartis, Roche, and Shire Pharmaceuticals. B.C. van Jaarsveld reports research grants from Fresenius Medical Care, Baxter, Vifor Fresenius Medical Care Renal Pharma, and Nipro outside the submitted work. There are no patents, products in development or marketed products to declare. This does not alter our adherence to all the PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials, as detailed online in the guide for authors.
Introduction
Health-related quality of life is an important indicator of well-being in patients with end-stage renal disease and is associated with survival and clinical outcomes[1–4]. Compared to the general population, patients with end-stage renal disease have severely diminished health-related quality of life, by some deemed even lower than in diseases such as congestive heart failure, chronic lung disease or cancer[5].
The preferred treatment for end-stage renal disease is kidney transplantation, which is associated with improved health-related quality of life and survival[6]. However, because of the limited availability of donor kidneys and because of transplant failure, many patients have to remain on dialysis.
An alternative to conventional dialysis modalities is frequent nocturnal hemodialysis. With this treatment, patients dialyze almost daily and twice as long (7–8 hours), generally at home. Thus, this treatment removes fluid more slowly and clears more solutes such as urea and phosphate[7]. Nocturnal hemodialysis may hence improve intermediate outcomes[8, 9] and possibly even survival, although mortality data remain inconsistent[10, 11]. By dialyzing at night, patients save time during the day, and nocturnal hemodialysis has thus been reported to improve health-related quality of life[12–14], to such an extent that some patients may even choose to forgo transplantation[15].
How clinicians should deal with this reluctance toward transplantation is unclear. Currently, there is no evidence to support the optimal treatment choice for these patients, particularly not regarding patient-reported outcome measures. To fill this gap, we compared health-related quality of life measured with the Kidney Disease Quality of Life—Short Form (KDQOL-SF) between kidney transplant recipients and transplantation-eligible patients treated with nocturnal hemodialysis.
Methods
Study population
We analyzed a cross-sectional cohort from the ongoing NOCTx study (NCT00950573), a prospective cohort study designed to compare progression of coronary artery calcification between kidney transplant recipients, patients on frequent nocturnal home hemodialysis, and patients on chronic peritoneal dialysis or conventional hemodialysis. Patients were eligible when aged between 18 and 75 years and were candidates for transplantation when on dialysis. All study participants gave written informed consent. NOCTx excluded patients with a life expectancy <3 months, pre-emptive transplantation, or non-adherence to dialysis regimens. NOCTx has been approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of the University Medical Center Utrecht and is conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.
Between December 2009 and February 2016, NOCTx included 54 kidney transplant recipients and 39 patients on nocturnal hemodialysis who were referred for study participation to the University Medical Center of Utrecht, the Netherlands. For the present analyses, we included all kidney transplant recipients (n = 41) and patients on nocturnal hemodialysis (n = 31) who had one-year follow-up data. Most patients with a kidney transplant and on nocturnal hemodialysis entered NOCTx 2–3 months after switching to their respective treatment; thus, data from before switching were not available in these patients. We therefore analyzed data cross-sectionally after one year of treatment.
Treatment characteristics
Patients received treatment according to guidelines by the attending nephrologists. Kidney transplant recipients were treated in two tertiary centers, where standard immunosuppressant regimens consisted of a calcineurin inhibitor (tacrolimus), mycophenolate mofetil, and prednisone in tapering doses. Patients on nocturnal hemodialysis were trained and monitored in two dialysis centers that offered specialized training programs for nocturnal home hemodialysis. Patients dialyzed ≥ 4 x 8 hours per week at home, on a single needle, with a lower effective blood flow (150–220 mL/min), lower dialysate flow (300 mL/min), and a somewhat lower bicarbonate concentration compared to conventional hemodialysis, which was adjusted depending on laboratory results. Unfractionated heparin was used as anticoagulation.
Health-related quality of life
We assessed health-related quality of life with the validated KDQOL-SF version 1.2[16]. The KDQOL-SF consists of a general part and a disease-specific part. The general part, the Short Form with 36 questions (SF-36) version 1[17], consists of eight domains that can be summarized in two scores. These summary scores are designed to reflect the general population in the United States when the means are 50 with a standard deviation of 10 points for physical functioning (physical composite score) and mental functioning (mental composite score)[18]. The composite scores were obtained from 12 questions in the SF-36 (PCS-12 and MCS-12)[1]. The disease-specific part of the KDQOL-SF consists of 44 kidney disease-targeted questions, grouped in 12 domains. We focused on the domains “symptoms of kidney disease”, “effects of kidney disease”, “burden of kidney disease”, “cognitive function”, “quality of social interaction”, “sexual function”, “sleep”, “social support” and “overall health”. We did not evaluate the domains “work status”, “patient satisfaction” and “dialysis staff encouragement” in this study. The domains are scored from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better quality of life. Explanations of the disease-specific domains are available as Table 1 (adapted from Carmichael et al.[19]).
Other variables
At time of questionnaire completion, study personnel recorded demographical and clinical parameters (pre-dialysis blood pressure and post-dialysis weight averaged from routine measurements during 3 hemodialysis sessions or 2 outpatient visits for kidney transplant recipients) and laboratory parameters (total calcium, phosphate, parathyroid hormone, total cholesterol, albumin, hemoglobin, and C-reactive protein) routinely measured at local treatment facilities. Study personnel assessed presence of comorbidities by chart review, and assessed residual urine production with the most recent 24h-urine collection, which we classified as present (≥100mL/24u) or absent. Smoking status, oral anticoagulant use, and educational level were self-reported.
We defined diabetes mellitus as use of oral anti-diabetic medication or insulin therapy, and cardiovascular disease as any history of angina, myocardial infarction, percutaneous coronary intervention, coronary artery bypass grafting, stroke, intermittent claudication, peripheral artery angioplasty or bypass grafting. We defined higher education as any tertiary education. We estimated glomerular filtration rate with the Chronic Kidney Disease-Epidemiology Collaboration equation 2009 for kidney transplant recipients.
Statistical analyses
We reported data as number (proportion) for categorical data, mean ±standard deviation for normally distributed variables, and median (interquartile range [IQR]) for non-normally distributed variables. We presented patient characteristics and health-related quality of life by renal replacement therapy. We compared categorical data with chi-squared tests, normally distributed variables with t-tests, and non-normally distributed variables with Mann-Whitney-U tests.
We used multiple linear regression analyses to examine the associations between renal replacement therapy and health-related quality of life. We regarded 5-point differences clinically relevant in the disease-specific domains, and 3-point differences clinically relevant in the composite scores[17, 18]. We adjusted stepwise for potential confounders age (years), sex, educational level (high/low), dialysis duration (years), presence of diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular disease, and presence of residual urine production (≥100mL/24u or absent), and kept them in the model when coefficients changed >10%. In the final model, we adjusted for age, sex, dialysis duration, cardiovascular disease, and presence of residual urine production.
We reported regression coefficients with 95% confidence intervals (CI). We considered P-values ≤ 0.05 (two-tailed) statistically significant, did not attempt imputation for missing values, and performed all analyses with R 3.4.1[20].
Results
Study population
The mean age of the study population (n = 72) was 54 ±13 years, 50 (69%) were male, median dialysis duration was 38 (IQR 25–60) months, and 17 (24%) had a history of cardiovascular disease. There were no significant differences in demographics or medical history between the kidney transplant recipients (n = 41) and patients on nocturnal hemodialysis (n = 31), but kidney transplant recipients had significantly lower phosphate levels and higher hemoglobin levels (Table 2). Kidney transplant recipients had an estimated glomerular filtration rate of 54.8 ±15.7 mL/min, while patients on nocturnal hemodialysis had median 0 (IQR 0–250) mL/day residual urine production. Patients on nocturnal hemodialysis dialyzed 38.3 ±7.2 hours per week in 4.8 ±0.8 sessions per week.
The current sample comprised 77% of all kidney transplant recipients and patients on nocturnal hemodialysis who entered NOCTx (n = 93). Seven kidney transplant recipients (3 were lost to follow-up, 2 withdrew consent, 2 died) and 7 patients on nocturnal hemodialysis (3 received a transplant, 2 withdrew consent, 1 was lost to follow-up, 1 died) did not complete follow-up at one year, while 6 kidney transplant recipients and 1 patient on nocturnal hemodialysis did not complete quality of life questionnaires at the one-year follow-up. Their mean age (n = 21) was 49 ±14 years (P = 0.15 versus study population), 12 (57%) were male (P = 0.43 versus study population), median dialysis duration was 65 (IQR 42–84) months (P = 0.03 versus study population), and 4 (19%) had a history of cardiovascular disease (P = 0.89 versus study population). Kidney transplant recipients were not more likely to complete follow-up than patients on nocturnal hemodialysis (P = 0.88).
Health-related quality of life at one year of treatment
The quality of life questionnaires were generally well-completed. In the following scales, one or more questionnaire items were missing resulting in a missing score: “sexual function” (5 respondents, 7%), SF-12 items (physical and mental composite scores; 2 respondents, 3%), “symptoms of kidney disease”, “effects of kidney disease”, “burden of kidney disease”, and “overall health” (1 respondent each, 1%).
Overall, kidney transplant recipients had numerically higher scores on the kidney disease-specific domains of health-related quality of life and the physical composite score compared to patients on nocturnal hemodialysis (Fig 1). Kidney transplant recipients scored significantly higher on the domain “effects of kidney disease” compared to patients on nocturnal hemodialysis, both in crude and adjusted analyses (Table 3). There were no significant differences on the other kidney disease-specific domains or the composite scores in both crude and adjusted analyses. When adjusted for age, sex, dialysis duration, cardiovascular disease, and residual urine production, kidney transplant recipients had potentially clinically relevant higher scores on the domains “burden of kidney disease”, “social support”, and the physical composite score compared to nocturnal hemodialysis, but these differences were not significant.
Mean health-related quality of life scores on the disease-specific domains “symptoms”, “effects”, “burden of kidney disease”, and the physical composite scores as bar charts in the 72 kidney transplant recipients and patients on nocturnal hemodialysis. We presented 95% confidence intervals alongside the bars. Mean scores for kidney transplantation and nocturnal hemodialysis: “symptoms” 86 and 81; “effects” 86 and 76; “burden” 75 and 67; physical composite score 47 and 43 points, respectively.
Discussion
To our knowledge, this is the first study to compare health-related quality of life between kidney transplantation and nocturnal hemodialysis, demonstrating that kidney transplantation is associated with significantly higher quality of life on the domain “effects of kidney disease” compared to nocturnal hemodialysis. In addition, kidney transplant recipients have potentially clinically relevant higher quality of life on the domains “burden of kidney disease”, “social support”, and the physical composite score, although not significantly higher in this study. Together, these findings suggest that health-related quality of life is generally better after kidney transplantation than on treatment with nocturnal hemodialysis.
The differences in health-related quality of life are the most evident on the domain “effects of kidney disease”. As this domain involves the restraints patients experience regarding their diet, ability to travel, and dependency on doctors, it is explainable that kidney transplant recipients score higher on this domain. After all, kidney transplant recipients are freer in terms of diet and travel than any patient on dialysis. Besides this domain, kidney transplant recipients have numerically higher adjusted scores on the domains “burden of kidney disease”, “social support”, and the physical composite score. Although not statistically significant, these differences may be clinically relevant[21]. The original KDQOL-SF manual reads that 5-point differences are clinically relevant regarding the disease-specific domains, and 3-point differences regarding the composite scores[17, 18], which has been adopted by others[22, 23]. Notably, a 3-point difference in the composite scores is associated with a mortality risk of approximately 6.0%[2, 3, 24]. Given the size and consistent direction of these differences, we consider them relevant, even though they do not reach statistical significance with the current sample size.
In our experience, some patients treated with nocturnal hemodialysis decline kidney transplantation and prefer to stay on treatment with nocturnal hemodialysis. The current findings suggest that kidney transplantation—in which quality of life is known to improve[25–27]—is a more favorable treatment option regarding health-related quality of life for transplantation-eligible patients on nocturnal hemodialysis, although individual outcomes may differ importantly.
For patients that are unlikely to receive a kidney transplant (e.g. HLA-sensitized patients), potential benefits of nocturnal hemodialysis remain relevant, such as an improvement of quality of life. Importantly, health-related quality of life has been shown to improve after conversion to nocturnal hemodialysis from conventional hemodialysis in several observational studies[12, 14] and on selected domains in a randomized trial[28]. This is despite the fact that nocturnal hemodialysis is performed almost daily and requires considerable patient involvement. Notably, patients on nocturnal hemodialysis in our cohort have somewhat higher health-related quality of life scores compared to North-American cohorts[12, 13, 29], which may be because all patients were transplantation candidates in our study. Remarkably, nocturnal hemodialysis does not seem to deteriorate sleep quality: patients on nocturnal hemodialysis have similar scores on the domain “sleep” to kidney transplant recipients in our study.
The results of this study should be interpreted within the context of some limitations. First, our study is not powered to demonstrate significance of all potentially relevant differences in kidney disease-specific health-related quality of life domains. For example, we would have needed 161 patients per group to show significance of an 8-point difference (as currently found) in the disease-specific domain “burden of kidney disease”. Second, the current data are cross-sectional after one year of treatment with kidney transplantation or nocturnal hemodialysis. A before/after comparison of health-related quality of life was not possible as patients were included in this study shortly after they had started treatment with either kidney transplantation or nocturnal hemodialysis. Third, we do not know the reasons why individual patients converted to nocturnal hemodialysis–there may have been patient selection. As noted in previous studies, healthier and more motivated patients may have been preferentially selected for nocturnal hemodialysis[30], which could influence health-related quality of life. Also, the current data are observational, although it should be noted that randomization to kidney transplantation would be unethical.
Our study has several strengths. First, questionnaire response rate in this study is high (91%) as compared to large studies on patients on hemodialysis[1, 2]. The responders’ demographic characteristics are largely similar to that of non-responders; therefore, we consider our findings generalizable to patients on nocturnal hemodialysis who may opt for kidney transplantation. Second, we focus on kidney disease-specific domains of health-related quality of life alongside the physical and mental composite scores, which increases the ability to detect more specific differences in patients’ well-being. Finally, this study has only included patients on nocturnal hemodialysis who were transplantation candidates; simultaneously, no kidney transplant recipients had been transplanted pre-emptively, i.e. all recipients had a history of dialysis treatment. Both of these inclusion criteria enable valid comparisons between the treatment groups.
In conclusion, health-related quality of life is higher after kidney transplantation especially on the domain “effects of kidney disease” compared to nocturnal hemodialysis. This can be useful when counseling patients on nocturnal hemodialysis who may opt for transplantation.
Supporting information
S1 Dataset. Source data on which the results of this study are based.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0204405.s001
(CSV)
Acknowledgments
We thank the following centers for recruiting patients for this study: Dialysecentrum Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands; VU Medisch Centrum; Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Stichting Dianet Dialysecentra, and Universitair Medisch Centrum Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
References
- 1. Lacson E Jr., Xu J, Lin SF, Dean SG, Lazarus JM, Hakim RM. A comparison of SF-36 and SF-12 composite scores and subsequent hospitalization and mortality risks in long-term dialysis patients. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2010;5(2):252–60. pmid:20019120
- 2. Mapes DL, Lopes AA, Satayathum S, McCullough KP, Goodkin DA, Locatelli F, et al. Health-related quality of life as a predictor of mortality and hospitalization: the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (DOPPS). Kidney Int. 2003;64(1):339–49. pmid:12787427.
- 3. Lowrie EG, Curtin RB, LePain N, Schatell D. Medical outcomes study short form-36: a consistent and powerful predictor of morbidity and mortality in dialysis patients. Am J Kidney Dis. 2003;41(6):1286–92. pmid:12776282.
- 4. Kalantar-Zadeh K, Kopple JD, Block G, Humphreys MH. Association among SF36 quality of life measures and nutrition, hospitalization, and mortality in hemodialysis. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2001;12(12):2797–806. pmid:11729250.
- 5. Mittal SK, Ahern L, Flaster E, Maesaka JK, Fishbane S. Self-assessed physical and mental function of haemodialysis patients. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2001;16(7):1387–94. pmid:11427630.
- 6. Tonelli M, Wiebe N, Knoll G, Bello A, Browne S, Jadhav D, et al. Systematic review: kidney transplantation compared with dialysis in clinically relevant outcomes. Am J Transplant. 2011;11(10):2093–109. pmid:21883901.
- 7. Pierratos A, Ouwendyk M, Francoeur R, Vas S, Raj DS, Ecclestone AM, et al. Nocturnal hemodialysis: three-year experience. J Am Soc Nephrol. 1998;9(5):859–68. pmid:9596084.
- 8. Jansz TT, Ozyilmaz A, Grooteman MPC, Hoekstra T, Romijn M, Blankestijn PJ, et al. Long-term clinical parameters after switching to nocturnal haemodialysis: a Dutch propensity-score-matched cohort study comparing patients on nocturnal haemodialysis with patients on three-times-a-week haemodialysis/haemodiafiltration. BMJ Open. 2018;8(3):e019900. pmid:29523566
- 9. Walsh M, Culleton B, Tonelli M, Manns B. A systematic review of the effect of nocturnal hemodialysis on blood pressure, left ventricular hypertrophy, anemia, mineral metabolism, and health-related quality of life. Kidney Int. 2005;67(4):1500–8. pmid:15780103.
- 10. Pauly RP, Gill JS, Rose CL, Asad RA, Chery A, Pierratos A, et al. Survival among nocturnal home haemodialysis patients compared to kidney transplant recipients. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2009;24(9):2915–9. pmid:19584107.
- 11. Rocco MV, Daugirdas JT, Greene T, Lockridge RS, Chan C, Pierratos A, et al. Long-term Effects of Frequent Nocturnal Hemodialysis on Mortality: The Frequent Hemodialysis Network (FHN) Nocturnal Trial. Am J Kidney Dis. 2015;66(3):459–68. pmid:25863828
- 12. Lockridge RS Jr., Spencer M, Craft V, Pipkin M, Campbell D, McPhatter L, et al. Nightly home hemodialysis: five and one-half years of experience in Lynchburg, Virginia. Hemodialysis international International Symposium on Home Hemodialysis. 2004;8(1):61–9. pmid:19379403.
- 13. Garg AX, Suri RS, Eggers P, Finkelstein FO, Greene T, Kimmel PL, et al. Patients receiving frequent hemodialysis have better health-related quality of life compared to patients receiving conventional hemodialysis. Kidney Int. 2017;91(3):746–54. pmid:28094031
- 14. Van Eps CL, Jeffries JK, Johnson DW, Campbell SB, Isbel NM, Mudge DW, et al. Quality of life and alternate nightly nocturnal home hemodialysis. Hemodialysis international International Symposium on Home Hemodialysis. 2010;14(1):29–38. pmid:20377650.
- 15. Rosenthal MM, Molzahn AE, Chan CT, Cockfield SL, Kim SJ, Pauly RP. Why take the chance? A qualitative grounded theory study of nocturnal haemodialysis recipients who decline kidney transplantation. BMJ Open. 2016;6(5):e011951. pmid:27194322
- 16. Korevaar JC, Merkus MP, Jansen MA, Dekker FW, Boeschoten EW, Krediet RT, et al. Validation of the KDQOL-SF: a dialysis-targeted health measure. Qual Life Res. 2002;11(5):437–47. pmid:12113391.
- 17.
Ware JE, Snow KK, Kosinski M, Gandek B. SF-36 Health Survey-Manual and Interpretation Guide. Boston: The Health Institute, New England Medical Center; 1993.
- 18.
Ware JE, Kosinski M, Keller SD. SF-36 Physical and Mental Health Summary Scales: A User’s Manual, 2nd Ed. Boston: The Health Institute, New England Medical Center; 1994.
- 19. Carmichael P, Popoola J, John I, Stevens PE, Carmichael AR. Assessment of quality of life in a single centre dialysis population using the KDQOL-SF questionnaire. Qual Life Res. 2000;9(2):195–205. pmid:10983483.
- 20.
R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2016.
- 21. van Rijn MHC, Bech A, Bouyer J, van den Brand J. Statistical significance versus clinical relevance. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2017;32(suppl_2):ii6–ii12. pmid:28064161.
- 22. Mazairac AH, Grooteman MP, Blankestijn PJ, Penne EL, van der Weerd NC, den Hoedt CH, et al. Differences in quality of life of hemodialysis patients between dialysis centers. Qual Life Res. 2012;21(2):299–307. pmid:21633878
- 23. Hall YN, Larive B, Painter P, Kaysen GA, Lindsay RM, Nissenson AR, et al. Effects of six versus three times per week hemodialysis on physical performance, health, and functioning: Frequent Hemodialysis Network (FHN) randomized trials. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2012;7(5):782–94. pmid:22422538
- 24. DeOreo PB. Hemodialysis patient-assessed functional health status predicts continued survival, hospitalization, and dialysis-attendance compliance. Am J Kidney Dis. 1997;30(2):204–12. pmid:9261030.
- 25. Laupacis A, Keown P, Pus N, Krueger H, Ferguson B, Wong C, et al. A study of the quality of life and cost-utility of renal transplantation. Kidney Int. 1996;50(1):235–42. pmid:8807593.
- 26. Molnar-Varga M, Molnar MZ, Szeifert L, Kovacs AZ, Kelemen A, Becze A, et al. Health-related quality of life and clinical outcomes in kidney transplant recipients. Am J Kidney Dis. 2011;58(3):444–52. pmid:21658828.
- 27. Overbeck I, Bartels M, Decker O, Harms J, Hauss J, Fangmann J. Changes in quality of life after renal transplantation. Transplant Proc. 2005;37(3):1618–21. pmid:15866689.
- 28. Culleton BF, Walsh M, Klarenbach SW, Mortis G, Scott-Douglas N, Quinn RR, et al. Effect of frequent nocturnal hemodialysis vs conventional hemodialysis on left ventricular mass and quality of life: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2007;298(11):1291–9. pmid:17878421.
- 29. Manns BJ, Walsh MW, Culleton BF, Hemmelgarn B, Tonelli M, Schorr M, et al. Nocturnal hemodialysis does not improve overall measures of quality of life compared to conventional hemodialysis. Kidney Int. 2009;75(5):542–9. pmid:19109588.
- 30. Tennankore KK, Na Y, Wald R, Chan CT, Perl J. Short daily-, nocturnal- and conventional-home hemodialysis have similar patient and treatment survival. Kidney Int. 2018;93(1):188–94. pmid:28844317.