Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Built environment correlates of physical activity in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review

  • Sarah Elshahat ,

    Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    selshahat01@qub.ac.uk

    Affiliation School of Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences, Centre for Public Health, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland, United Kingdom

  • Michael O’Rorke,

    Roles Conceptualization, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Department of Epidemiology, College of Public Health, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, United States of America

  • Deepti Adlakha

    Roles Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Supervision, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation School of Natural and Built Environment, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland, United Kingdom

Abstract

Insufficient physical activity (PA) is the fourth major risk factor for many non-communicable diseases and premature mortality worldwide. Features of the built environment (BE) play a considerable role in determining population PA behaviors. The majority of evidence for PA-BE relationships comes from high-income countries and may not be generalizable to low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). We aim to systematically review the literature and assess the associations between perceived and/or objective BE characteristics and PA domains in LMICs. This review adopted a systematic search strategy for English language articles published between January 2000 and June 2019 from four electronic databases—Medline, Embase, Web of Science and PubMed—adhering to the PRISMA guidelines. Studies addressing the associations between self-reported and/or objective BE and PA were only included if they were conducted in LMICs, according to the World Bank classification list. Articles investigating PA-BE relationships across any age groups were included, and all study designs were eligible, except for qualitative studies and reviews. Thirty-three studies were included for evidence synthesis. Cross-sectional studies were the most prevailing study design (97%), revealing a notable gap in longitudinal PA-BE research in LMICs. A majority of the BE factors were not associated with different PA domains while others (e.g., density, proximity to services, aesthetics) exhibited an inconsistent association. Land-use mix diversity was positively associated with transport PA and the presence of recreation facilities resulted in an increase in PA during leisure-time. Increased safety from crime at night consistently increased total PA and walking levels. Research exploring the associations between BE attributes and PA behaviors in LMICs appears to be limited and is primarily cross-sectional. Longitudinal research studies with objective measures are needed for inferring well-grounded PA-BE causal relationships and informing the design of evidence-based environmental interventions for increasing PA levels in LMICs.

1. Introduction

Physical inactivity is a global public health issue and the fourth leading risk factor for many non-communicable diseases (NCDs), including obesity, diabetes, cardiovascular disease, stroke and some cancers [1]. The global health care costs of physical inactivity have been estimated to exceed international $53 billion annually [2]. Worldwide, about 3.2 million deaths are attributed to insufficient physical activity (PA) annually, with low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) carrying a disproportionate share of the disease burden [3]. Approximately 82% of the global NCDs deaths take place in LMICs, where the risk of premature NCD mortality is 1.5 times higher than high-income country populations [4]. Regular physical activity directly contributes to achieving the UN Sustainable Development Goal 3 (good health and well-being) as it helps prevent and treat NCDs [5]. Recognizing the importance of PA for NCD prevention, the WHO member states made an agreement to jointly work towards a relative decline in the global prevalence of inadequate PA by 10% by 2025 [6]. However, a recent study of 168 countries by Guthold et al. [7] did not reveal a significant decrease in the worldwide prevalence of insufficient PA between 2001 and 2016, (28.5 vs 27.5%, respectively), indicating slow progress towards meeting the global target and highlighting an urgent need for accelerated actions and policy changes for reversing these trends.

Characteristics of the built environment (BE) (human-made physical parts of the environment where people live and work, e.g., homes, buildings, streets, parks, open spaces, and transport infrastructure) play a vital role in determining individuals’ PA behaviors across four separate life-domains: domestic or home-based PA, occupational or work-related PA, travel PA, and leisure PA. Examples of the BE attributes include residential density, diversity and access to a mix of land uses and public services (e.g. parks, greenways, transit stops), pleasant neighborhood surroundings (e.g. trees, shrubs, rivers), as well as crime and traffic safety [8]. For example, accessible public parks and recreational amenities provide settings for leisure-time PA for families, individuals and institutions [9]. Availability of high-quality infrastructure for walking and cycling (e.g. sidewalks, bike paths, crosswalks) promote travel PA amongst populations [9].

Research investigating the associations between PA and BE attributes has increased rapidly over the last two decades and has become an international priority [10,11]. The vast majority of evidence in this area has primarily been limited to developed countries in Europe, North America, and Australia, with recent evidence from some LMICs in Asia, Africa and South America [8,1214]. For instance, a systematic review of 70 studies from Europe revealed a consistent evidence for positive associations between accessible public services and PA, and reported a gap in knowledge of the BE correlates across different PA domains [15]. Similarly, Smith et al. systematically reviewed 28 studies from the US and Australia, and reported significant positive relationships between destination accessibility, travel and total PA [1]. A recent systematic review of 25 studies by Zhang et al. [16] investigated the impact of BE characteristics in parks in North America, Australia, and Europe, and reported significant positive associations between park-based leisure PA, park lighting and walking and cycling trails. However, these findings may not generalize to LMIC contexts, where BE attributes are distinct from developed countries with respect to patterns of land-use, density, design and urbanization [17]. Population growth and economic development have spurred rapid absolute increases in the number of motor vehicles in LMICs, with marked shifts in travel patterns that are moving away from public transport, walking and cycling, to private motorized vehicles [12]. Rapid, unplanned urban expansion has contributed to environmental and health hazards, including road traffic casualties, air pollution, and diminished safe spaces for walking and cycling [18]. In the last decade, Latin America has witnessed major urban changes such as an increase in utilities infrastructure and expansion in transport networks, influencing lifestyle changes and PA behaviors in populations [19,20]. For example, studies showed that residential density and street connectivity were associated with reduced likelihood of PA in urban Brazil and Colombia, respectively. [21,22]. These socio-ecological issues are associated with reduced PA levels and sedentary lifestyles, making populations of LMICs highly predisposed to NCDs and premature mortality [23].

Despite the well-documented benefits of PA, there is a gap in the current knowledge of the pathways through which the BE can promote or constrain PA across different life domains (e.g., home, work, travel and leisure) in LMICs populations. Previous reviews on this topic have been constrained by several limitations including challenges in summarising studies given their heterogeneity in terms of study design and quality and approach to evidence synthesis [24,25]. For instance, Day [24] conducted a review to investigate the impact of different BE features (e.g. density, availability of parks) and non-BE factors (e.g. weather, stray animals) on PA levels in developing countries. However, the review was narrative in nature, was not restricted to LMICs, and did not follow PRISMA guidelines or assess the quality of included studies.

The present systematic review aims to more robustly investigate the associations between BE characteristics and PA domains amongst different populations exclusively from LMICs, in order to inform and direct future research and necessary policy change towards sustainable design of the BE and to foster and promote more physically active populations in these developing regions.

2. Methodology

This systematic review was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) (Registration no. CRD42019141945) [26].

2.1. Search strategy

This review was conducted following the PRISMA guidelines for reporting of systematic reviews [27] (S1 Appendix). Various search terms and phrases were selected to reflect the key concepts of the review (PA, BE, LMICs), and combined using Boolean operators AND/OR (S2 Appendix). Four electronic databases were searched: Medline, Embase, Web of Science and PubMed. The search was limited to human studies and restricted to English Language papers published between January 2000 and June 2019 to summarize contemporaneous literature in the past two decades. A manual search of the reference lists of potentially relevant articles was also conducted.

2.2. Study selection

Studies were considered for inclusion only if they were conducted in LMICs, according to the World Bank classification list [28]. The included studies investigated the association between objectively and/or subjectively measured BE attributes and PA. All PA domains across all age groups were included. All study designs were eligible, with the exception of qualitative studies and any types of reviews. Studies investigating the impact of PA on health outcomes without any BE attributes were excluded. A two-step procedure was adopted for selection of eligible articles from among the retrieved results. Firstly, all authors (SE, MOR, DA) screened titles and abstracts of the retrieved articles after duplicate removal. Secondly, all potentially relevant studies were re-assessed in full, applying the previously established inclusion/exclusion criteria (Fig 1). Disagreements were resolved via discussion.

2.3. Data extraction

A pre-defined data collection form was used for data extraction. This comprised authorship, study origin (country), characteristics of study subjects, study design, sampling methods, covariates, PA and BE variables, as well as key findings (S3 Appendix). Data was classified according to the PA domains, namely, leisure-time PA, travel PA, leisure-time walking, transport-related walking, transport-related cycling, and total PA (S4 Appendix). For each PA domain, BE characteristics were categorized into six categories according to the Neighborhood Environment Walkability Scale [29]: land-use mix diversity, density, land-use mix access, aesthetics, infrastructure for walking and cycling, as well as crime and traffic safety. Additional categories for addressing associations with income and urbanicity (degree to which a given geographical area is urban) were added.

2.4. Quality assessment and evidence synthesis

An eight-item checklist was constructed for assessing the quality of the included studies (S5 Appendix). Six items were adapted from both the Center for Evidence-Based Management quality appraisal guidelines, and a previously developed checklist by Barnett et al. [30,31]. These included: [1] study design [weight: cross-sectional or case study = 1, longitudinal or quasi design = 2], [2] reliable response rate (≥80%) [yes = 1, no = 0], [3] stratification of recruitment areas by suitable environmental characteristics to maintain generalizability [yes = 1, no = 0], [4] controlling for socio-demographic confounders [yes = 1, no = 0], [5] calculation of confidence interval for main results [yes = 1, no = 0], and [6] assessment of statistical significance (p value) [yes = 1, no = 0]. In order to improve the appropriateness of appraising the studies included in the current review, two additional items were considered; [7] method of PA measurement (weight: subjective = 0.5, objective = 1), and [8] method of BE measurement (weight: subjective = 0.5, objective = 1). Higher scorings indicate better quality: ≤4 (low quality), 4.1–5.9 (intermediate quality), 6–6.9 (high quality), and ≥7 (very high quality). The review adapted the criteria developed by Sallis et al. [32] for synthesizing evidence in relation to PA-BE associations.

3. Results

3.1. Study characteristics and quality assessment

The literature search yielded a total of 6,324 articles. In addition, six papers were identified from the bibliographies of relevant studies. Of these, only 33 articles met the eligibility criteria and were included in the final analysis (Fig 1). Most of these studies were carried out in Brazil (43%), followed by both Colombia (9%) and India (9%) (S1 Table). Approximately 94% of the included studies adopted a cross-sectional design.

Most studies were considered to be of high quality (55%), and about 30% were of moderate quality (S5 Appendix). Potential socio-demographic confounders (e.g., age, gender, socioeconomic status) were controlled for in 88% of the included studies. Only 27% of the eligible articles reported a reliable response rate (≥80%). Only 9% of the studies measured PA objectively (i.e., using an accelerometer), whereas 42% considered assessing BE attributes through objective methods (i.e., geographical information systems (GIS)). Leisure PA was the most commonly investigated PA domain across studies (48%), followed by leisure walking (30%) (S1 Table). Transport cycling was only investigated in four studies [21,3335]. The most predominant BE attributes were safety from traffic and crime safety (45% each). We classified the results into four main subsections according to PA domains: leisure PA, travel PA, walking and cycling, as well as total PA.

3.2. Leisure PA

3.2.1. Land-use mix diversity.

Two studies showed that land-use mix diversity was not significantly related to self-reported leisure PA (Table 1).

thumbnail
Table 1. Relationships between leisure PA and BE attributes across included studies.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0230454.t001

A cross-sectional study by Adlakha et al. [8] did not find any significant associations between perceived land-use mix diversity and self-reported leisure PA among urban Indian adults. Likewise, Jáuregui et al. [36] did not detect any significant relationships between both in urban Mexico (Cuernavaca).

3.2.2. Density.

Perceived residential density showed an inconsistent association with self-reported leisure PA (Table 1). A significant negative association between both was found in urban India by Adlakha et al. [8], whereas, a study by Rech et al. [37] in urban Brazil did not detect any significant relationships. Availability of recreational amenities (e.g. parks, fitness centers) was a consistently positive feature (100%) of leisure PA across LMICs (Table 1). Amorim et al [44], also showed that reduced perception of green spaces was significantly associated with lower leisure PA in urban Brazil (Pelotas).

3.2.3. Land-use mix access and proximity to services.

A cross-sectional study by Adlakha et al. did not reveal any significant association between land-use mix access and leisure PA among urban Indian adults [8]. Studies revealed inconsistent associations between proximity of recreational amenities and leisure PA (Table 1). While studies by both Akpinar et al. [39] and Chen et al. [45] detected significant positive associations for urban green spaces proximity, Jáuregui et al. [36], Hino et al. [43] and Rech et al. [37] did find any significant relationships. Studies did not demonstrate any significant relationships between proximity of services (i.e., transit stops, stores) and leisure PA (Table 1).

3.2.4. Aesthetics.

Studies revealed inconsistent relationships between perceived aesthetics and self-reported leisure PA in different LMICs (Table 1). Aesthetics was a significant positive predictor in urban Turkey (Aydın), Mexico (Cuernavaca) and Brazil (Curitiba) [36,37,39], whereas it did not show any significant relationships in urban India (Chennai), Uganda (Kampala) and Brazil (Recife) [8,41,46].

3.2.5. Infrastructure for walking and cycling.

Studies revealed no significant relationships between leisure PA and either street connectivity or presence of infrastructure for walking and cycling (Table 1). When investigating perceived sidewalks availability, Parra et al. [33] detected a positive relationship with self-reported leisure PA, whereas, Vancampfort et al. [41] did not note any significant association. Finally, a study by Gomez et al. [19] in Colombia (Bogotá) found a significant negative association between objectively-measured land slope of ≥ 4% and self-reported leisure PA.

3.2.6. Crime and traffic safety.

Traffic safety was not significantly associated with leisure PA across LMICs (Table 1). Crime safety was also not related to self-reported leisure PA across studies, with the exception of one study by Rech et al. [37] who reported a significant positive association in urban Brazil.

3.2.7. District income.

Only two studies investigated the relationship between district income (assessed through GIS) and leisure-time PA. These showed a significant positive association between high area income and self-reported leisure PA in southern Brazil (Curitiba) [43,47].

3.3. Travel PA

3.3.1. Land-use mix diversity.

Two separate studies by Adlakha et al. [8,49] showed significant positive relationships between perceived land-use mix diversity and self-reported travel PA in urban Indian adults. Jáuregui et al [36], on the other hand, did not note any significant associations between both in urban Mexico.

3.3.2. Density.

While residential density predicted significantly increased odds for travel PA in India (Chennai), it was not significantly related to multi-modal or active commuting in the same Indian City [8,49].

3.3.3. Land-use mix access and proximity to services.

Adlakha et al. [8] reported no significant relationships between land-use mix access and travel PA in urban India (Chennai). While Adlakha et al. [49] reported a strong positive association between transit stop proximity and travel PA in urban India, a study by Jáuregui et al. [36] did not demonstrate a significant association between both in urban Mexico.

3.3.4. Aesthetics.

Three studies showed significant negative relationships between neighborhood aesthetics and travel PA (Table 2).

thumbnail
Table 2. Relationships between travel PA and BE attributes across included studies.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0230454.t002

Aesthetics predicted significantly reduced odds of transport PA among urban Indian adults in studies by Adlakha et al. [8,49]. Hallal et al. [46] also reported an inverse relationship between aesthetics and travel PA in urban Brazil.

3.3.5. Infrastructure for walking and cycling.

Studies did not detect any significant relationships between presence of infrastructure for walking and bicycling and self-reported travel PA across LMICs (Table 1). Adlakha et al. [8,49] reported a significant negative association between perceived street connectivity and self-reported travel PA in India (Chennai).

3.3.6. Crime and traffic safety.

Perceived traffic safety was unrelated to travel PA across LMICs (Table 1). On the other hand, surveys by Adlakha et al. [8,49] showed that higher perceived crime safety in urban India was significantly negatively associated with travel PA.

3.4. Walking and cycling

3.4.1. Density.

Objectively measured residential density (GIS) predicted increased and decreased odds of transport walking and transport cycling in urban Brazil, respectively (Table 3).

thumbnail
Table 3. Relationships between walking/ cycling and BE attributes across included studies.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0230454.t003

Hino et al. [21] reported that commercial density in Brazil (Curitiba) was significantly positively associated with self-reported transport walking, but it was not significantly related to transport cycling. Street density was a significant positive predictor for leisure walking in urban Brazil [50], yet it showed inconsistent associations with both transport walking and cycling across LMICs (Table 1). When combining both transport and leisure walking, Gomez et al. [22] found a positive relationship with objectively assessed park density (GIS) in urban Columbia.

3.4.2. Land-use mix access and proximity to services.

Studies did not reveal any significant relationships between proximity to transit stops and leisure walking, transport walking or transport cycling (Table 1). Perceived proximity to public services (e.g. stores, parks and transport stations) in suburban China (Shanghai) was associated with significantly increased odds for both transport and leisure walking [51]. Parra et al. [33], however, did not show significant relationships between perceived presence of public services with a 10-min walk in urban Brazil and either transport or leisure walking, yet a significant positive association was found for transport cycling.

3.4.3. Aesthetics.

Perceived aesthetics was not significantly related to either leisure or transport walking across LMICs (Table 1). Jia et al. [51] did not detect any significant relationships between aesthetics and either self-reported transport or leisure walking in urban Chinese adults. A survey by Hallal et al. [46] also did not reveal any significant associations between perceived presence of pleasant surroundings and leisure walking in urban Brazil.

3.4.4. Infrastructure for walking and cycling.

Studies did not detect any significant relationships for presence of infrastructure for walking and cycling and leisure walking, transport walking or transport cycling (Table 1). Giehl et al. [50], however, reported significant positive associations between transport walking and street connectivity, sidewalks or paved streets (assessed through GIS) among Brazilian older adults. When examining the impact of lack of sidewalks on self-reported leisure walking among urban Brazilian adults, Hallal et al. [46] reported a negative association, whereas Gomes et al. [20] noted a positive relationship. Bike path existence within 500-m buffers in Brazil (Sao Paulo) was associated with significantly increased odds for leisure walking in a study by Florindo et al. [14]. On the other hand, terrain slope of ≥5% and high street connectivity (measured using GIS) predicted reduced odds of total walking among urban Columbian adults [22].

3.4.5. Crime and traffic safety.

Studies did not show significant associations between traffic safety and leisure walking, transport walking or transport cycling across LMICs (Table 1). While perceived crime-related safety did not exhibit any association with either leisure walking or transport cycling, it was a significant positive predictor for self-reported transport walking in Brazil (Curitiba) [33]. When combining both transport and leisure walking, Oyeyemi et al. [52] noted significant positive associations with both perceived crime safety during day and at night.

3.4.6. District income.

Studies did not show any significant associations between district income and transport walking (Table 1). On the other hand, objectively assessed medium and high area income in Brazil predicted significantly increased odds of self-reported leisure walking in Curitiba and Florianópolis, respectively [43,50]. In contrast, high district income was inversely associated with transport cycling among urban Brazilian adults [21].

3.5. Total PA

3.5.1. Density.

A study in Nigerian students (University of Ibadan) by Oyeyemi et al. [12] did not reveal any significant association between perceived residential density or existence of leisure facilities and total PA (Table 4).

thumbnail
Table 4. Relationships between total PA and BE attributes across included studies.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0230454.t004

3.5.2. Land-use mix access and proximity to services.

Proximity of public services and transit stops did not exhibit any relationships with total PA (Table 1). Proximity to recreational amenities, however, significantly increased odds for total PA among urban Mexican adults [53].

3.5.3. Aesthetics.

Studies did not report any significant relationships between perceived aesthetics and total PA (Table 1). Jáuregui et al. [53] did not detect any significant relationship between aesthetics and objectively measured total PA (accelerometer) in urban Mexican adults. Perceived pleasant surroundings was also not related to self-reported PA in young Nigerian adults [12].

3.5.4. Infrastructure for walking and cycling.

Parra et al. [33] noted significant positive associations between total PA and presence of sidewalks, bike paths or steep terrain among urban Brazilian adults. Perceived lack of four-way intersections predicted significantly reduced odds of participation in total PA in Nigerian university students [12].

3.5.5. Crime and traffic safety.

While perceived crime safety during the day showed inconsistent relationships, crime safety at night was consistently positively associated with total PA across LMICs (Table 1). Two studies did not show any significant relationship between perceived traffic safety and total PA among urban Mexican and Brazilian adults (Table 1). Oyeyemi et al. [12] however, reported a significant unexpected negative association between perceived traffic safety and self-reported total PA (excluding walking) among young Nigerian adults.

3.5.6. Urbanicity.

Three studies demonstrated a consistent significant positive association (100%) between urbanicity and self-reported physical inactivity (Table 1). A cross sectional analysis of data from 46 LMICs showed a significant positive association between urbanicity and not meeting the WHO PA guidelines [56]. Similarly, urbanization was a significant positive predictor for self-reported physical inactivity in separate studies by Katulanda et al. (in Sri Lanka) [57] and Allender et al. (in India) [58].

4. Discussion

This systematic review aimed to provide a better understanding of the impact of BE attributes on PA behaviors in LMICs populations. We identified a supportive role of the BE environment on PA domains, however, there were considerable variations in BE correlates across different PA domains in LMICs. All eligible studies included in this review were descriptive in nature (cross-sectional and case-series design), revealing the gap in longitudinal and analytical research in LMICs. More than half of included studies (58%) were conducted in Latin America (Mexico, Brazil, and Columbia), highlighting the paucity of research on this topic in other developing countries.

Perceived land-use mix diversity was not significantly related to leisure PA, however, there was a consistent positive association with travel PA across LMICs. Our findings produced limited data concerning land-use mix access and did not show any significant relationships with either leisure PA or travel PA. Similarly, in a systematic review of 64 studies from both high-income and LMICs, Cleland et al [59] revealed no significant relationship between land-use mix access and either leisure or travel PA in older adults.

Residential density was significantly positively related to transport walking, but negatively associated with transport cycling. A possible reason for this inverse relationship with cycling may be the lack of bicycling infrastructure such as segregated bike paths, specialized traffic signs, and signals and secured bike racks in highly dense residential areas [60]. In many LMICs, perceptions that roads are dangerous and uncomfortable, largely due to high volumes and high speeds of motorised traffic are well-established barriers to cycling [61]. Transport-related walking and bicycling are still common means of transportation especially in lower income groups, accounting for 50% to 70% of commuter trips in some urban areas, yet social prejudice against bicycle use prevails, and car ownership is still seen as a sign of social status [62]. Similar to our study, a survey by Forsyth et al. [63] revealed that residential density was significantly positively correlated with travel walking in the US (Minnesota). Commercial density was investigated only in one study in urban Brazil, where it predicted significantly increased odds of transport walking, yet it was not significantly related to transport cycling [21]. Across LMICs, availability of recreational amenities showed a consistent positive influence (100%) on leisure PA only. Existence of leisure amenities was also a significant positive predictor for leisure PA in Australia (Adelaide) and the US (North Carolina) [64,65].

This review showed that subjectively or objectively measured proximity to transit stops was not significantly associated with PA domains across LMICs. A meta-analysis of nine studies from North America and the UK, however, concluded that access to public transit was significantly positively correlated with participation in PA [66]. In contrast to developed countries, the lack of association between proximity to transit stops and PA in LMICs may be due to the widespread availability of alternative privately-operated ride-hailing services (e.g., minibuses, taxis, autorickshaws or tuk-tuks) providing fast connections to transit stops and minimizing PA levels [67]. Perceived aesthetics showed a significant association (negative direction) only with travel PA. In contrast, the presence of pleasant surroundings increased the likelihood of participation in PA among Japanese adults [68]. These conflicting results may be explained by discrepancies in different populations’ perceptions about aesthetics and its importance in promoting PA behavior.

Our results reveal that availability of infrastructure for safe walking and cycling was not significantly associated with any PA domains across LMICs. A study in older American adults also did not find significant relationships between perceived presence of walking and cycling facilities and self-reported total PA in seven rural areas in North Carolina [69]. Self-reported and/or objective street connectivity did not show significant associations with leisure PA, leisure walking or transport cycling, however, it was significantly inversely related to travel PA. The study findings demonstrated that presence of bike paths was not significantly related to any PA domains. The 2012 Active People Survey in England, however, showed that bike path networks were significantly positively related to self-reported cycling [70]. These variations may be explained by the juxtaposition of different means of transportation (pedestrians, bicyclists, and drivers), poor road infrastructure, lack of walking and cycling paths, weak road regulations and law enforcement in LMICs [71]. These inconsistent findings may also be related to socio-cultural differences and gendered norms in developing countries. For example, cycling is perceived as more appropriate for younger men, but an improper and unacceptable activity for women to engage in as per societal traditions in some LMICs [72].

Reviewed literature showed that perceived crime safety was not significantly related to leisure PA, yet it was significantly inversely associated with travel PA. These inconclusive results were also reported in previous studies, highlighting the need for further investigation of the influence of crime-related safety on different PA domains [73]. Perceived traffic safety was not significantly related to any PA domain across LMICs. On the other hand, perceived traffic-related safety predicted increased odds of participation in PA among Dutch adults in a study by Jongeneel-Grimen et al. [74]. These variations may be attributed to differences in perceived meaning of traffic safety among populations of different countries, where LMICs populations are more accustomed to high traffic volumes. Similar to Jongeneel-Grimen et al.’s study, a narrative review by Day [24] reported an association between traffic safety and travel PA in developing countries. However, we believe that findings from this review may have been inconclusive due to inconsistencies in evidence synthesis. Along with BE features, this review also examined non-BE factors (e.g. stray animals, weather), which may have impacted the overall study findings and conclusions.

Some studies showed that high district income was significantly positively associated with both leisure PA and leisure walking. Kari et al. [75] also reported that higher district income was a significant positive predictor for leisure PA among Finnish adults. High-income populations often have the resources to pay for memberships in private, well-maintained leisure centres, offering a wide variety of recreational activities (e.g. swimming and fitness classes, gymnasium, golf courts) [76].

Studies revealed that urbanicity significantly increased the likelihood of physical inactivity across LMICs. In both developed and developing countries, there is strong evidence that urbanicity is associated with increased sedentary behavior and diminishing levels of PA [58]. Urbanicity was also a significant positive predictor of physical inactivity among older populations in Europe [77]. Urban environment factors such as high population density, motorization, lack of safety from traffic and crime, diminishing space for walking, cycling and recreational activities, and excessive involvement in screen-based leisure time activities (e.g., television watching, video games, computer use, etc.) are associated with reduced PA and higher sedentary behaviors [23]. Measures of urbanicity have limitations as they only consider basic aspects of urbanization [78]. In LMIC contexts, these measures may not be capturing the context accurately as neighborhoods may have differing types of BE infrastructure (e.g., number of paved roads, proximity to markets, etc.), highlighting the need to create a hierarchy of BE features corresponding to levels of urbanicity for LMICs.

5. Strengths & limitations

This systematic review focuses on addressing the relationship between BE and PA in LMICs, which have thus far garnered limited research attention. Given that there are no gold standards for the selection of databases in the conduct of systematic reviews, we adopted a rigorous search strategy across four electronic databases including MEDLINE, PubMED, EMBASE and Web of Science. In conjunction with a robust search strategy, we feel confident that no pertinent articles were missed. This review was registered in PROSPERO to increase its transparency and minimize reporting bias. The findings were categorized by PA domains in order to allow effective reporting on the relationship between each separate domain and with BE features. This study, however, has some limitations for consideration. Given the large number of PA and BE variables examined, different statistical methods adopted by studies, and the inconsistency in the measurement of different PA domains and BE characteristics across the included studies, it was not feasible to do a meta-analysis. The majority of evidence in the current study was based on cross-sectional designs, which cannot infer causation [79]. Furthermore, more than half of the included studies relied on self-reported questionnaires for measuring BE and/or PA, which made our results subject to different types of bias (e.g. social desirability, recall bias) [80]. This review only included English publications, which posed the likelihood of excluding other relevant non-English articles from LMICs.

6. Conclusions and recommendations

Research investigating the relationship between BE and PA behaviors amongst LMICs populations appears to be limited. The majority of evidence in this field comes from cross-sectional studies, highlighting the gap in longitudinal, analytical and intervention research in LMICs. The majority of the investigated BE attributes were either unrelated or showed inconsistent relationships with all PA domains.

Based on the findings of this systematic review, we propose that future BE-PA research and policy making in LMICs must focus on longitudinal assessments in different geographical areas (both rural and urban), with sub-group variations (e.g., age, gender, socioeconomic status and ethnicity) in order to infer reliable, temporal BE-PA relationships that will inform public health interventions and practice. Utilizing a combination of both validated/standardized objective and self-reported measures for assessing BE attributes and different PA domains can minimize any potential information bias. Recommendations include the development of tailored environmental interventions for promoting PA amongst LMICs populations, with feasibility studies for testing, and intervention evaluation before scaling up.

Supporting information

S2 Appendix. The search terms used in the searched databases.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0230454.s002

(DOCX)

S3 Appendix. The standardized form with data extracted from the 33 eligible studies.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0230454.s003

(DOCX)

S4 Appendix. Classification of data according to PA domains.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0230454.s004

(DOCX)

S5 Appendix. Quality assessment of the included studies.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0230454.s005

(DOCX)

S1 Table. Numerical distribution and characteristics of the included studies.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0230454.s006

(DOCX)

References

  1. 1. Smith M, Hosking J, Woodward A, Witten K, Macmillan A, Field A, et al. Systematic literature review of built environment effects on physical activity and active transport–an update and new findings on health equity. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2017;14: 158. pmid:29145884
  2. 2. Ding D, Lawson K, Kolbe-Alexander T, Finkelstein E, Katzmarzyk P, Mechelen W, et al. The economic burden of physical inactivity: A global analysis of major non-communicable diseases. Lancet. 2016;388.
  3. 3. WHO. Physical inactivity: A global public health problem. https://www.who.int/dietphysicalactivity/factsheet_inactivity/en/. (2019). Accessed 10 Jul 2019.
  4. 4. Allen L, Cobiac L, Townsend N. Quantifying the global distribution of premature mortality from non-communicable diseases. J Public Health. 2017;39: 1–6. pmid:28184435
  5. 5. United Nations. Sport and the sustainable development goals: An overview outlining the contribution of sport to the SDGs. https://www.un.org/sport/sites/www.un.org.sport/files/ckfiles/files/Sport_for_SDGs_finalversion9.pdf. (2015). Accessed 18 Feb 2020.
  6. 6. WHO. Global NCD target: Reduce physical inactivity. https://www.who.int/beat-ncds/take-action/policy-brief-reduce-physical-inactivity.pdf?ua=1. (2016). Accessed 10 July 2019.
  7. 7. Guthold R, Stevens GA, Riley LM, Bull FC. Worldwide trends in insufficient physical activity from 2001 to 2016: A pooled analysis of 358 population-based surveys with 1·9 million participants. Lancet Glob Heal. 2018;6: E1077–E1086.
  8. 8. Adlakha D, Hipp JA, Brownson RC, Eyler AA, Lesorogol CK, Raghavan R. “Can we walk?” Environmental supports for physical activity in India. Prev Med. 2017;103: S81–S89. pmid:27663431
  9. 9. Sallis JF, Floyd MF, Rodriguez DA, Saelens BE. Role of Built Environments in Physical Activity, Obesity, and Cardiovascular Disease. Circulation. 2012;125: 729–737. pmid:22311885
  10. 10. Sallis JF. Environmental and policy research on physical activity is going global. Res Exerc Epidemiol. 2011;13: 111–117.
  11. 11. Bauman AE, Reis RS, Sallis JF, Wells JC, Loos RJ, Martin BW. Correlates of physical activity: Why are some people physically active and others not? Lancet. 2012;380: 258–271. pmid:22818938
  12. 12. Oyeyemi AL, Adegoke BOA, Oyeyemi AY, Sallis JF. Perceived environmental correlates of physical activity and walking in African young adults. Am J Heal Promot. 2011;25: e10–9. pmid:21534826
  13. 13. Bassett D, Pucher J, Buehler R, Thompson DL, Crouter S. Walking, cycling, and obesity rates in Europe, North America, and Australia. J Phys Act Health. 2008;5: 795–814. pmid:19164816
  14. 14. Florindo AA, Barrozo LV, Cabral-Miranda W, Rodrigues EQ, Turrell G, Goldbaum M, et al. Public open spaces and leisure-time walking in Brazilian adults. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017;14: 553. pmid:28545242
  15. 15. Van Holle V, Deforche B, Van Cauwenberg J, Goubert L, Maes L, Van de Weghe N, et al. Relationship between the physical environment and different domains of physical activity in European adults: A systematic review. BMC Public Health. 2012;12: 807. pmid:22992438
  16. 16. Zhang R, Wulff H, Duan Y, Wagner P. Associations between the physical environment and park-based physical activity: A systematic review. J Sport Heal Sci. 2019;8: 412–421. pmid:31534816
  17. 17. McMichael AJ. The urban environment and health in a world of increasing globalization: Issues for developing countries. Bull World Health Organ. 2000;78: 1117–1126. pmid:11019460
  18. 18. Agarwal S, Satyavada A, Kaushik S, Kumar R. Urbanization, urban poverty and health of the urban poor: Status, challenges and the way forward. Demogr India. 2007;35: 121–134.
  19. 19. Gomez LF, Sarmiento OL, Parra DC, Schmid TL, Pratt M, Jacoby E, et al. Characteristics of the built environment associated with leisure-time physical activity among adults in Bogotá, Colombia: A multilevel study. J Phys Act Heal. 2010;7: S196–S203. pmid:20702907
  20. 20. Gomes GA, Reis RS, Parra DC, Ribeiro I, Hino AA, Hallal PC, et al. Walking for leisure among adults from three Brazilian cities and its association with perceived environment attributes and personal factors. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2011;8: 111. pmid:21995846
  21. 21. Hino AAF, Reis RS, Sarmiento OL, Parra DC, Brownson RC. Built environment and physical activity for transportation in adults from Curitiba, Brazil. J Urban Heal. 2014;91: 446–462. pmid:24096625
  22. 22. Gomez LF, Parra DC, Buchner D, Brownson RC, Sarmiento OL, Pinzon JD, et al. Built environment attributes and walking patterns among the elderly population in Bogota. Am J Prev Med. 2010;38: 592–9. pmid:20494235
  23. 23. Olabarria M, Pérez C, Santamariña-Rubio E, Novoa AM. Daily mobility patterns of an urban population and their relationship to overweight and obesity. Transp Policy. 2014;32: 165–171.
  24. 24. Day K. Physical environment correlates of physical activity in developing countries: A review. J Phys Act Heal. 2018;15: 1–12. pmid:29278043
  25. 25. Day K. Built environmental correlates of physical activity in China: A review. Prev Med Reports. 2016;3: 303–316. pmid:27419030
  26. 26. Elshahat S, Adlakha D, O’Rourke M. Relationship between built environment features and physical activity in low and middle-income countries: A systematic review. PROSPERO; 2019; CRD42019141945.
  27. 27. Moher D, Shamseer L, Clarke M, Ghersi D, Liberati A, Petticrew M, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Syst Rev. 2015;4.
  28. 28. The World Bank. World Bank country and lending groups. https://datahelpdesk.worldbank.org/knowledgebase/articles/906519. (2019). Accessed 17 July 2019.
  29. 29. Cerin E, Saelens BE, Sallis JF, Frank LD. Neighborhood environment walkability scale: Validity and development of a short form. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2006;38: 1682–1691. pmid:16960531
  30. 30. Center for Evidence Based Management. Critical appraisal. https://www.cebma.org/resources-and-tools/what-is-critical-appraisal/. (2019). Accessed 17 Jul 2019.
  31. 31. Barnett DW, Barnett A, Nathan A, Van Cauwenberg J, Cerin E. Built environmental correlates of older adults’ total physical activity and walking: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2017;14: 103. pmid:28784183
  32. 32. Sallis JF, Prochaska JJ, Taylor WC. A review of correlates of physical activity of children and adolescents. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2000;32: 963–975. pmid:10795788
  33. 33. Parra DC, Hoehner CM, Hallal PC, Ribeiro IC, Reis R, Brownson RC, et al. Perceived environmental correlates of physical activity for leisure and transportation in Curitiba, Brazil. Prev Med. 2011;52: 234–238. pmid:21195726
  34. 34. Reis RS, Hino AAF, Parra DC, Hallal P, Brownson RC. Bicycling and walking for transportation in three Brazilian cities. Am J Prev Med. 2013;44: e9–e17. pmid:23332344
  35. 35. Cervero R, Sarmiento OL, Jacoby E, Gómez LF, Neiman A. Influences of built environments on walking and cycling: Lessons from Bogotá. Int J Sustain Transp. 2009;3: 203–226.
  36. 36. Jáuregui A, Salvo D, Lamadrid-Figueroa H, Hernández B, Rivera JA, Pratt M. Perceived neighborhood environmental attributes associated with leisure-time and transport physical activity in Mexican adults. Prev Med. 2017;103: S21–S26. pmid:27939266
  37. 37. Rech C, Reis R, Hino A, Hallal P. Personal, social and environmental correlates of physical activity in adults from Critiba, Brazil. Prev Med. 2014;58. pmid:24220100
  38. 38. Jaime P, Duran AC, Sarti F, Lock K. Investigating environmental determinants of diet, physical activity, and overweight among adults in Sao Paulo, Brazil. J Urban Health. 2011;88: 567–581. pmid:21327549
  39. 39. Akpinar A, Cankurt M. How are characteristics of urban green space related to levels of physical activity: Examining the links. Indoor Built Environ. 2016;26: 1091–1101.
  40. 40. Gul Y, Sultan Z, Moeinaddini M, Jokhio GA. The effects of physical activity facilities on vigorous physical activity in gated and non-gated neighborhoods. Land use policy. 2018;77: 155–162.
  41. 41. Vancampfort D, Stubbs B, Sallis JF, Nabanoba J, Basangwa D, Oyeyemi AL, et al. Associations of the built environment with physical activity and sedentary time in Ugandan outpatients with mental health problems. J Phys Act Health. 2019;16: 243–250. pmid:30862237
  42. 42. Cunningham-Myrie CA, Theall KP, Younger NO, Mabile EA, Tulloch-Reid MK, Francis DK, et al. Associations between neighborhood effects and physical activity, obesity, and diabetes: The Jamaica Health and Lifestyle Survey 2008. J Clin Epidemiol. 2015;68: 970–978. pmid:25910912
  43. 43. Hino AA, Reis RS, Sarmiento OL, Parra DC, Brownson RC. The built environment and recreational physical activity among adults in Curitiba, Brazil. Prev Med. 2011;52: 419–422. pmid:21497165
  44. 44. Amorim TC, Azevedo MR, Hallal PC. Physical activity levels according to physical and social environmental factors in a sample of adults living in South Brazil. J Phys Act Heal. 2010;7: S204–S212. pmid:20702908
  45. 45. Chen Y, Gu W, Liu T, Yuan L, Zeng M. Increasing the use of urban greenways in developing countries: A case study on Wutong Greenway in Shenzhen, China. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017;14: 554. pmid:28545246
  46. 46. Hallal PC, Reis RS, Parra DC, Hoehner C, Brownson RC, Simões EJ. Association between perceived environmental attributes and physical activity among adults in Recife, Brazil. J Phys Act Heal. 2010;7: S213–S222. pmid:20702909
  47. 47. Reis R, Hino AAF, Rech CR, Kerr J, Hallal PC. Walkability and physical activity: Findings from Curitiba, Brazil. Am J Prev Med. 2013;45: 269–275. pmid:23953352
  48. 48. Rech CR, Reis RS, Hino AAF, Rodriguez-Añez CR, Fermino RC, Gonçalves PB, et al. Neighborhood safety and physical inactivity in adults from Curitiba, Brazil. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2012;9: 72. pmid:22691163
  49. 49. Adlakha D, Hipp JA, Sallis JF, Brownson RC. Exploring neighborhood environments and active commuting in Chennai, India. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018;15: E1840. pmid:30149686
  50. 50. Giehl MWC, Hallal PC, Corseuil CW, Schneider IJC, D’Orsi E. Built environment and walking behavior among Brazilian older adults: A population-based study. J Phys Act Heal. 2016;13: 617–624. pmid:26693941
  51. 51. Jia Y, Usagawa T, Fu H. The association between walking and perceived environment in Chinese community residents: A cross-sectional study. PLoS One. 2014;9. pmid:24587214
  52. 52. Oyeyemi A, Adegoke B, Sallis JF, Oyeyemi A, De Bourdeaudhuij I. Perceived crime and traffic safety is related to physical activity among adults in Nigeria. BMC Public Health. 2012;12: 294. pmid:22520066
  53. 53. Jáuregui A, Pratt M, Lamadrid-Figueroa H, Hernández B, Rivera JA, Salvo D. Perceived neighborhood environment and physical activity: The International Physical Activity and Environment Network Adult Study in Mexico. Am J Prev Med. 2016;51: 271–279. pmid:27180029
  54. 54. Malambo P, De Villiers A, Lambert EV, Puoane T, Kengne AP. The relationship between objectively-measured attributes of the built environment and selected cardiovascular risk factors in a South African urban setting. BMC Public Health. 2018;18: 1–9. pmid:29986681
  55. 55. Trude A, Vedovato G, Mui Y, Oliveira M, Martins P. Factors associated with physical inactivity and sedentary behavior among women living in the urban area of Santos City, Brazil. Rev Bras Atividade Física Saúde. 2016;21: 162.
  56. 56. Koyanagi A, Stubbs B, Vancampfort D. Correlates of low physical activity across 46 low- and middle-income countries: A cross-sectional analysis of community-based data. Prev Med. 2018;106: 107–113. pmid:29066372
  57. 57. Katulanda P, Jayawardena R, Ranasinghe P, Rezvi Sheriff MH, Matthews DR. Physical activity patterns and correlates among adults from a developing country: The Sri Lanka Diabetes and Cardiovascular Study. Public Health Nutr. 2012;16: 1–9. pmid:22995708
  58. 58. Allender S, Lacey B, Webster P, Rayner M, Deepa M, Scarborough P, et al. Level of urbanization and noncommunicable disease risk factors in Tamil Nadu, India. Bull World Health Organ. 2010;88: 297–304. pmid:20431794
  59. 59. Cleland C, Reis R, Hino A, Hunter R, Fermino R, Paiva H, et al. Built environment correlates of physical activity and sedentary behaviour in older adults: A comparative review between high and low-middle income countries. Health Place. 2019;57: 277–304. pmid:31132718
  60. 60. Opinion Research Services. Lessons from higher density development. https://www.london.gov.uk/sites/default/files/project_2_3_lessons_from_higher_density_development.pdf. (2016). Accessed 16 August 2019.
  61. 61. Bener A. The neglected epidemic: Road traffic accidents in a developing country, State of Qatar. Int J Inj Contr Saf Promot. 2002;12: 45–47. pmid:15814375
  62. 62. Shoham DA, Dugas LR, Bovet P, Forrester TE, Lambert EV, Plange-Rhule J, et al. Association of car ownership and physical activity across the spectrum of human development: Modeling the epidemiologic transition study (METS). BMC Public Health. 2015;15. pmid:25885263
  63. 63. Forsyth A, Michael Oakes J, Schmitz K, Hearst M. Does residential density increase walking and other physical activity? Urban Stud. 2007;44: 679–697.
  64. 64. Cerin E, Vandelanotte C, Leslie E, Merom D. Recreational facilities and leisure-time physical activity: An analysis of moderators and self-efficacy as a mediator. Heal Psychol. 2008;27: S126–35.
  65. 65. Huston SL, Evenson KR, Bors P, Gizlice Z. Neighborhood environment, access to places for activity, and leisure-time physical activity in a diverse North Carolina population. Am J Heal Promot. 2003;18: 58–69. pmid:13677963
  66. 66. Xiao C, Goryakin Y, Cecchini M. Physical activity levels and new public transit: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Prev Med. 2019;56: 464–473. pmid:30777164
  67. 67. Finn B, Mulley C. Urban bus services in developing countries and countries in transition: A framework for regulatory and institutional developments. J Public Transp. 2011;14: 89–107.
  68. 68. Kondo K, Lee JS, Kawakubo K, Kataoka Y, Asami Y, Mori K, et al. Association between daily physical activity and neighborhood environments. Environ Health Prev Med. 2009;14: 196–206. pmid:19568848
  69. 69. Shores KA, West ST, Theriault DS, Davison EA. Extra-individual correlates of physical activity attainment in rural older adults. J Rural Heal. 2009;25: 211–8. pmid:19785589
  70. 70. Downward P, Rasciute S. Assessing the impact of the National Cycle Network and physical activity lifestyle on cycling behaviour in England. Transp Res Part A Policy Pract. 2015;78.
  71. 71. WHO. Global status report on road safety: Time for action. https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/44122/9789241563840_eng.pdf;jsessionid=8B5A9EC0DD10944A0535E6C377FA157E?sequence=1. (2009). Accessed 27 August 2019.
  72. 72. Kaplan S, Manca F, Nielsen T, Prato C. Intentions to use bike-sharing for holiday cycling: An application of the Theory of Planned Behavior. Tour Manag. 2015;47: 34–46.
  73. 73. Ding D, Adams MA, Sallis JF, Norman GJ, Hovell MF, Chambers CD, et al. Perceived neighborhood environment and physical activity in 11 countries: Do associations differ by country? Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2013;10: 57. pmid:23672435
  74. 74. Jongeneel-Grimen B, Droomers M, Oers HM, Stronks K, Kunst AE. The relationship between physical activity and the living environment: A multi-level analyses focusing on changes over time in environmental factors. Health Place. 2014;26. pmid:24448404
  75. 75. Kari J, Pehkonen J, Hirvensalo M, Yang X, Hutri-Kähönen N, Raitakari O, et al. Income and physical activity among adults: Evidence from self-reported and pedometer-based physical activity measurements. PLoS One. 2015;10: e0135651. pmid:26317865
  76. 76. Silva M, Cashman S, Kunte P, Candib L. Improving population health through integration of primary care and public health: Providing access to physical activity for community health center patients. Am J Public Health. 2012;102: e56–61. pmid:22994250
  77. 77. Kemperman A, Timmermans HJP. Influences of built environment on walking and cycling by latent segments of aging population. Transp Res Rec. 2009;2134: 1–9.
  78. 78. Hermosillo-Gallardo ME, Jago R, Sebire SJ. Association between urbanicity and physical activity in Mexican adolescents: The use of a composite urbanicity measure. PLoS One. 2018;13: e0204739. pmid:30261073
  79. 79. Setia M. Methodology series module 3: Cross-sectional studies. Indian J Dermatol. 2016;61: 261–264. pmid:27293245
  80. 80. Fisher RJ, Katz JE. Social-desirability bias and the validity of self-reported values. Psychol Mark. 2000;17: 105–120.