Chest
Volume 109, Issue 4, April 1996, Pages 982-988
Journal home page for Chest

Clinical Investigations: Lung Cancer
Evaluation of Pulmonary Lesions With FDG-PET: Comparison of Findings in Patients With and Without a History of Prior Malignancy

https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.109.4.982Get rights and content

Study objective

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of positron emission tomography (PET) using F-18-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) in differentiating benign from malignant pulmonary lesions both in patients with and without a history of prior malignancy.

Design

Forty-eight consecutive patients with pulmonary lesions suspicious for malignancy underwent FDG-PET scanning. Group 1 included 27 patients without and group 2 included 21 patients with a history of malignancy. Pathologic proof of diagnosis was obtained for 32 patients and 16 patients were followed up clinically and radiographically for at least 6 months. The standard uptake ratio (SUR) and the lesion to background (L/B) ratio were determined in 45 patients.

Setting

Vanderbilt University Medical Center.

Results

In group 1, the average SUR and L/B ratio for malignant lesions (n=14) were 8.9 ±4.9 and 20.6 ± 14.2, respectively. For benign lesions (n=12), the average SUR was 3.3±3.2 and L/B ratio was 5.2±5.5. In group 2, the average SUR and L/B ratio for malignant lesions were not significantly different from group 1. Using either a SUR greater than 2.5 or L/B ratio greater than 5 as an cutoff level to differentiate benign and malignant lesions, the sensitivity and negative predictive value in both groups were 100%. There were five false-positive studies in group 1 and one in group 2, including tuberculosis (n=2), a granulomatous lesion (n=l), an inflammatory lesion (n=l), a schwannoma (n=l), and a fibrous mesothelioma (n=l). The overall accuracy was 88%, 81% in group 1, and 95% in group 2.

Conclusion

FDG-PET can identify malignant pulmonary lesions both in patients without and with a history of prior malignancy with a high sensitivity and negative predictive value for lesions greater than 1 cm (100% in this study). High FDG uptake by some inflammatory processes and benign tumors may cause false-positive results. Semiquantitative evaluation using SUR or L/B ratio provides similar accuracy.

Section snippets

Patient Population

This study includes 48 consecutive patients who underwent an FDG-PET scan for clinical evaluation of a pulmonary lesion. There were 36 men and 12 women ranging from 33 to 88 years of age. Thirty patients had a pathologic diagnosis of the suspicious lesion within 6 weeks of the PET scan. Tissue was obtained by thoracotomy (n=22), endobronchial biopsy (n=4), pleural biopsy (n=l), mediastinoscopy (n=1), and fine-needle aspiration (n=2); 2 patients had evidence of malignancy by pleural cytologic

Results

Patients were divided in two groups based on whether they had a history of prior malignancy. There were 27 patients with new pulmonary lesions and no history of malignancy (group 1) and 21 patients with a history of prior malignancy (group 2). The prior malignancies in patients from group 2 were the following: Hodgkin's disease (n=l), melanoma (n=4), carcinoma of the colon (n=9), breast (n=2), cervix (n=2), lung (n=2), and kidney (n=l). All patients had surgical treatment of their primary

Discussion

PET provides a unique opportunity to study physiologic processes. Previous studies have demonstrated the usefulness of FDG-PET in the evaluation of pulmonary lesions.14, 15, 16 In this study, we compared the accuracy of FDG-PET to differentiate malignant from benign lesions in patients without and with a history of prior malignancy using two different parameters for semiquantitative measurements.

The two groups of patients were compared first using the SUR that requires attenuation correction of

Conclusion

FDG-PET is an accurate imaging modality to differentiate malignant from benign pulmonary lesions both in patients with and without a history of prior malignancy. The interpretation was equivalent using either the SUR or the L/B ratio, and the overall accuracy was 88%. Owing to its high sensitivity and negative predictive value for pulmonary lesions greater than 1 cm, FDG-PET can exclude the presence of a malignant lesion with great certainty, preventing further evaluation of some patients with

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors thank Nancy Buchheimer for excellent technical assistance and John Bobbitt for preparation of the figures.

References (29)

  • GallagherBM et al.

    Metabolic trapping as a principle of radiopharmaceutical design: some factors responsible for the biodistribution of [18F]2-deoxy-2-fluoro-D-glucose

    J Nucl Med

    (1978)
  • WahlRL et al.

    18F-2-deoxy-2-fluoro-D-glucose uptake into human tumor xenografts: feasibility studies for cancer imaging with positron emission tomography

    Cancer

    (1991)
  • KubotaK et al.

    Differential diagnosis of lung cancer with positron emission tomography: a prospective study

    J Nucl Med

    (1990)
  • NolopKB et al.

    Glucose utilization in vivo by human neoplasm

    Cancer

    (1987)
  • Cited by (195)

    • [<sup>18</sup>F]-fluorodeoxyglucose - Positron emission tomography in patients with active myelopathy

      2013, Mayo Clinic Proceedings
      Citation Excerpt :

      Leptomeningeal metastases have been reported to exhibit intraspinal hypermetabolism,26 and this was confirmed in 2 patients in our study. The FDG-PET can distinguish malignant from benign pulmonary lesions27 and appears to be highly sensitive in identifying systemic lymphoma.28 Spinal cord lymphoma was FDG-PET hypermetabolic in most (57%) of our patients, but these findings may have been lower than expected given the concomitant use of corticosteroid use in this patient group.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text