Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter June 22, 2016

Evaluation of the first fully automated immunoassay method for the measurement of stimulating TSH receptor autoantibodies in Graves’ disease

  • Renato Tozzoli EMAIL logo , Federica D’Aurizio , Danilo Villalta and Luca Giovanella

Abstract

Background:

Thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) receptor autoantibodies (TRAb) are pathogenetic and diagnostic hallmarks of Graves’ disease (GD). Three varieties of TRAb have been described: stimulating (S-TRAb), blocking (B-TRAb), and apoptotic (A-TRAb) autoantibodies. Very recently, the first immunoassay method (Immulite TSI assay, Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics) declared to measure serum S-TRAb concentration, has been made available in an automated commercial platform. The aim of the study was to evaluate the ability of this new test to identify patients suffering from GD, in comparison with two current IMA methods for total TSH receptor autoantibodies (T-TRAb) measurement.

Methods:

Sera of 383 subjects [72 patients with untreated GD, 55 patients with autoimmune thyroiditis (AIT), 36 patients with multinodular non-toxic goiter, 100 patients with other non-thyroid autoimmune diseases (NTAD) and 120 healthy subjects (HS)] were evaluated.

Results:

The threshold obtained by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was 0.54 IU/L, very similar to that proposed by the manufacturer (0.55 IU/L). Thyroid-stimulating immunoglobulins (TSI) were positive in all GD patients and negative in all but three controls (clinical sensitivity and specificity of 100% and 98.7%, respectively). Passing and Bablok regression analysis and Bland-Altman plot showed an acceptable agreement between TSI Immulite assay and other two immunoassay methods (Cobas/Elecsys, Roche and TRAK RIA, BRAHMS Thermo Scientific).

Conclusions:

The diagnostic performance of fully automated Immulite TSI assay in GD patients is at least comparable to that of current TRAb immunoassays (IMAs) suggesting the possibility of including such assay in rapid and cost-saving diagnostic and monitoring algorithms. However, our results do not provide full evidence that this assay is specific for S-TRAb only, and future studies comparing Immulite TSI assay to stimulating activity are required.


Corresponding author: Renato Tozzoli, MD, Laboratory of Clinical Pathology, Department of Laboratory Medicine, ‘S. Maria degli Angeli’ Hospital, Via Montereale, 24, 33170 Pordenone, Italy, Phone: +39 0434-399213, Fax: +39 0434-399906

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Dr. Imperiali for his expert assistance in data elaboration, and to Dr. Filippetto and Dr. Scattolin for their technical support.

  1. Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.

  2. Research funding: None declared.

  3. Employment or leadership: None declared.

  4. Honorarium: None declared.

  5. Competing interests: The funding organization(s) played no role in the study design; in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; or in the decision to submit the report for publication.

References

1. Morshed SA, Davies TF. Graves’ disease mechanisms: the role of stimulating, blocking, and cleavage region TSH receptor antibodies. Horm Metab Res 2015;47:727–34.10.1055/s-0035-1559633Search in Google Scholar

2. Tozzoli R, Bagnasco M, Villalta D. Thyrotropin receptor antibodies. In: Shoenfeld Y, Meroni PL, Gershwin ME, editors. Autoantibodies, 3rd ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2014:375–83.10.1016/B978-0-444-56378-1.00045-9Search in Google Scholar

3. Adams DD, Purves HD. A new method of assay for thyrotrophic hormone. Endocrinology 1955;57:17–24.10.1210/endo-57-1-17Search in Google Scholar

4. McKenzie JM. Delayed thyroid response to serum from thyrotoxic patients. Endocrinology 1958;62:865–8.10.1210/endo-62-6-865Search in Google Scholar

5. Kriss JP, Pleshakov V, Chien JR. Isolation and identification of the long-acting thyroid stimulator and its relation to hyperthyroidism and circumscribed pretibial mixedema. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1964;24:1005–28.10.1210/jcem-24-10-1005Search in Google Scholar

6. Rees Smith B, Dorrington KJ, Munro DS. The thyroid-stimulating properties of long-acting thyroid stimulator and γ-globulin subunits. Biochem Biophys Acta 1969;192:277–85.10.1016/0304-4165(69)90366-3Search in Google Scholar

7. Lytton SD, Kahaly GJ. Bioassays for TSH-receptor autoantibodies: an update. Autoimmun Rev 2010;10:116–22.10.1016/j.autrev.2010.08.018Search in Google Scholar PubMed

8. Kamijo K, Murayama H, Uzu T, Togashi K, Kahaly GJ. A novel bioreporter assay for thyrotropin receptor antibodies using a chimeric thyrotropin receptor (Mc4) is more useful in differentiation of Graves’ disease from painless thyroiditis than conventional thyrotropin-stimulating antibody assay using porcine thyroid cells. Thyroid 2010;8:851–6.10.1089/thy.2010.0059Search in Google Scholar PubMed

9. Lytton SD, Li Y, Olivo PD, Kohn LD, Kahaly GJ. Novel chimeric thyroid-stimulating hormone-receptor bioassay for thyroid stimulating immunoglobulins. Clin Exp Immunol 2010;162:438–46.10.1111/j.1365-2249.2010.04266.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

10. Diana T, Kanitz M, Lehmann M, Li Y, Olivo PD, Kahaly GJ. Standardization of a bioassay for thyrotropin receptor stimulating autoantibodies. Thyroid 2015;25:160–75.10.1089/thy.2014.0346Search in Google Scholar PubMed

11. Araki N, Iida M, Amino N, Morita S, Ide A, Nishihara E, et al. Rapid bioassay for detection of thyroid-stimulating antibodies using cyclic adenosine monophosphate-gated calcium channel and aequorin. Eur Thyroid J 2015;4:14–9.10.1159/000371740Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

12. Kahaly G. Bioassays for TSH receptor antibodies: quo vadis? Eur Thyroid J 2015;4:3–5.10.1159/000375445Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

13. Shewring G, Rees Smith B. An improved radioreceptor assay for TSH receptor antibodies. Clin Endocrinol 1982;17:409–17.10.1111/j.1365-2265.1982.tb01607.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

14. Costagliola S, Morgenthaler NS, Hoermann R, Badenhoop K, Struck J, Freitag D, et al. Second generation assay for thyrotropin receptor antibodies has superior diagnostic sensitivity for Graves’ disease. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1999;84:90–7.Search in Google Scholar

15. Villalta D, Orunesu E, Tozzoli R, Montagna P, Pesce G, Bizzaro N, et al. Analytical and diagnostic accuracy of “second generation” assays for thyrotrophin receptor antibodies with radioactive and chemiluminescent tracers. J Clin Pathol 2004;57:378–82.10.1136/jcp.2003.012294Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

16. Smith BR, Bolton J, Young S, Collyer A, Weeden A, Bradbury J, et al. A new assay for thyrotropin receptor antibodies. Thyroid 2004;14:830–5.10.1089/1050725042451248Search in Google Scholar

17. Yoshimura Noh J, Miyazaki N, Ito K, Takeda K, Hiramatsu S, Morita S, et al. Evaluation of a new rapid and fully automated electrochemiluminescence immunoassay for thyrotropin receptor autoantibodies. Thyroid 2008;18:1157–64.10.1089/thy.2008.0119Search in Google Scholar PubMed

18. Tozzoli R, Kodermaz G, Villalta D, Bagnasco M, Pesce G, Bizzaro N. Accuracy of receptor-based methods for detection of thyrotropin-receptor autoantibodies: a new automated third-generation immunoassay shows higher analytical and clinical sensitivity for the differential diagnosis of hyperthyroidism. Auto Immun Highlights 2010;1:95–100.10.1007/s13317-010-0014-4Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

19. Tozzoli R, Bagnasco M, Giavarina D, Bizzaro N. TSH receptor autoantibody immunoassay in patients with Graves’ disease: improvement of diagnostic accuracy over different generations of methods. Systematic review and meta-analysis. Autoimmun Rev 2012;12:107–13.10.1016/j.autrev.2012.07.003Search in Google Scholar PubMed

20. Frank CU, Braeth S, Dietrich JW, Wanjura D, Loos U. Bridge technology with TSH receptor chimera for sensitive direct detection of TSH receptor antibodies causing Graves’ disease: analytical and clinical evaluation. Horm Metab Res 2015;47: 880–8.10.1055/s-0035-1554662Search in Google Scholar PubMed

21. Bahn RS, Burch HB, Cooper DS, Garber JR, Greenlee MC, Klein I, et al. Hyperthyroidism and other causes of thyrotoxicosis: management guidelines of the America Thyrod Association ans American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists. Endocr Pract 2011;17:e1–65.10.4158/EP.17.3.456Search in Google Scholar

22. Baloch Z, Carayon P, Comte-Devolx B, Demers LM, Feldt-Rasmussen U, Henry JF, et al. Laboratory medicine practice guidelines. Laboratory support for the diagnosis and monitoring of thyroid disease. Thyroid 2003;13:3–126.10.1089/105072503321086962Search in Google Scholar PubMed

23. Tahara K, Ishikawa N, Yamamoto K, Hirai A, Ito K, Tamura Y, et al. Epitopes for thyroid stimulating and blocking autoantibodies on the extracellular domain of the human thyrotropin receptor. Thyroid 1997;7:867–77.10.1089/thy.1997.7.867Search in Google Scholar PubMed

24. Rapoport B, Chazenbalk GD, Jaume JC, McLachlan SM. The thyrotropin (TSH) receptor: interaction with TSH and autoantibodies. Endocr Rec 1998;19:673–716.Search in Google Scholar

25. Zweig MH, Campbell G. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) plots: a fundamental evaluation tool in clinical medicine. Clinical Chem 1993;39:561–77.10.1093/clinchem/39.4.561Search in Google Scholar

26. Grasso YZ, Kim MR, Faiman C, Kohn LD, Tahara K, Gupta MK. Epitope eterogeneity of thyrotropin receptor-blocking antibodies in Graves’ patients as detected with wild-type versus chimeric thyrotropin receptors. Thyrod 1999;9:531–7.10.1089/thy.1999.9.531Search in Google Scholar PubMed

27. Evans ME, Sanders J, Tagami T, Sanders P, Young S, Roberts E, et al. Monoclonal antibodies to the TSH receptor, one with stimulating activity and one with blocking activity, obtained from the same blood sample. Clin Endocrinol 2010;73: 404–12.10.1111/j.1365-2265.2010.03831.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

28. Giuliani C, Cerrone D, Harii N, Thornton M, Kohn LD, Dagia NM, et al. TSHr-LH/CGr chimera that measures functional TSAb in Graves’ disease. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2012;97:E1106–15.10.1210/jc.2011-2893Search in Google Scholar PubMed

29. Lytton SD, Ponto KA, Kanitz M, Matheis N, Kohn LD, Kahaly GJ. A novel thyroid stimulating immunoglobulin bioassay is a functional indicator of activity and severity of Graves’ orbitopathy. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2010;95:2123–31.10.1210/jc.2009-2470Search in Google Scholar PubMed

30. Kamijo K, Murayama H, Uzu T, Togashi K, Olivo PD, Kahaly GJ. Similar clinical performance of a novel chimeric thyrod-stimulating hormone receptior bioassay and an automated thyroid-stimulating hormone receptor binding assay in Graves’ disease. Thyroid 2011;21:1295–9.10.1089/thy.2011.0056Search in Google Scholar PubMed

31. Lee JI, Jang HW, Kim SK, Choi JY, Kim JY, Hur KY, et al. Diagnostic value of a chimeric TSH receptor (Mc4)-based bioassay for Graves’ disease. Korean J Intern Med 2011;26:179–86.10.3904/kjim.2011.26.2.179Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

32. National Institute for Biological Standards and Control (NIBSC): WHO International Standard or reference reagent. Thyroid stimulating antibody NIBSC 08/204. Instruction for use (version 2.0, dated 28.03.2013). NIBSC, Potters Bar, Hertfordshire, UK. Available at: http://www.ninsc.org/document/ifu/08-204.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

33. McLachlan SM, Rapoport B. Thyrotropin-blocking autoantibodies and thyroid-stimulating autoantibodies: potential mechanisms involved in the pendulum swinging from hypothyroidism to hyperthyroidism and vice versa. Thyroid 2013;23:14–24.10.1089/thy.2012.0374Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

34. Takasu N, Matsushita M. Changes of TSH-stimulation blocking antibody (TSBAb) and thyroid stimulating antibody (TSAb) over 10 years in 34 TSBAb-positive patients with hypothyroidism and in 98 TSAb-positive Graves’ patients with hyperthyroidism: reevaluation of TSBAb and TSAb in TSH-receptor antibody (TRAb)-positive patients. J Thyroid Res 2012;2012:182176.10.1155/2012/182176Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

35. Wall JR, Lahooti H, El Kochairi I, Lytton SD, Champion B. Thyroid-stimulating immunoglobulins as measured in a reporter bioassay are not detected in patients with Hashimoto’s thyroiditis and ophthalmopathy or isolated upper eyelid retraction. Clin Ophthalmol 2014;8:2071–6.10.2147/OPTH.S67098Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

36. Kahaly GJ, Diana T, Glang J, Kanitz M, Pitz S, König J. Thyroid stimulating antibodies are highly prevalent in Hashimoto’s thyroiditis and associated orbitopathy. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2016;101:1998–2004.10.1210/jc.2016-1220Search in Google Scholar PubMed

37. Yaniv G, Twig G, Ben-Ami Shor D, Furer A, Sherer Y, Mozes O, et al. A volcanic explosion of autoantibodies in systemic lupus erythematosus: a diversity of 180 different autoantibodies found in SLE patients. Autoimmun Rev 2015;14:75–9.10.1016/j.autrev.2014.10.003Search in Google Scholar PubMed

38. Kumar K, Kole AK, Karmakar PS, Ghosh A. The spectrum of thyroid disorders in systemic lupus erythematosus. Rheumatol Int 2012;32:73–8.10.1007/s00296-010-1556-5Search in Google Scholar PubMed

39. Barbesino G, Tomer Y. Clinical utility of TSH receptor antibodies. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2013;98:2247–55.10.1210/jc.2012-4309Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

40. McKee A, Peyerl F. TSI assay utilization: impact on costs of Graves’ hyperthyroidism diagnosis. Am J Manag Care 2012;18:e1–14.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2016-3-10
Accepted: 2016-5-12
Published Online: 2016-6-22
Published in Print: 2017-1-1

©2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 23.4.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/cclm-2016-0197/html
Scroll to top button