Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter March 6, 2017

Verification of propofol sulfate as a further human propofol metabolite using LC-ESI-QQQ-MS and LC-ESI-QTOF-MS analysis

  • Alexandra Maas EMAIL logo , Christoph Maier , Beate Michel-Lauter , Sebastian Broecker , Burkhard Madea and Cornelius Hess

Abstract

Background:

Propofol (2,6-diisopropylphenol) is a water-insoluble, intravenous anesthetic that is widely used for the induction and maintenance of anesthesia as well as for endoscopic and pediatric sedation. After admission, propofol undergoes extensive hepatic and extrahepatic metabolism, including direct conjugation to propofol glucuronide and hydroxylation to 2,6-diisopropyl-1,4-quinol. The latter substance subsequently undergoes phase II metabolism, resulting in the formation of further metabolites (1quinolglucuronide, 4quinolglucuronide and 4quinol-sulfate). Further minor phase I propofol metabolites (2-(ω-propanol)-6-isopropylphenol and 2-(ω-propanol)-6-isopropyl-1,4-quinol)) are also described. Due to its chemical structure with the phenolic hydroxyl group, propofol is also an appropriate substrate for sulfation by sulfotransferases.

Methods:

The existence of propofol sulfate was investigated by liquid chromatography electrospray ionization triple quadrupole mass spectrometry (LCESIQQQ-MS) and liquid chromatography electrospray ionization quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry (LCESI-QTOF-MS). A propofol sulfate reference standard was used for identification and method development, yielding a precursor at m/z 257 (deprotonated propofol sulfate) and product ions at m/z 177 (deprotonated propofol) and m/z 80 ([SO3]).

Results:

Propofol sulfate – a further phase II metabolite of propofol – was verified in urine samples by LC-ESI-QQQ-MS and LC-ESI-QTOF-MS. Analyses of urine samples from five volunteers collected before and after propofol-induced sedation verified the presence of propofol sulfate in urine following propofol administration, whereas ascertained concentrations of this metabolite were significantly lower compared with detected propofol glucuronide concentrations.

Conclusions:

The existence of propofol sulfate as a further phase II propofol metabolite in humans could be verified by two different detection techniques (LCESIQQQ-MS and LC-ESI-QTOFMS) on the basis of a propofol sulfate reference standard. Evaluation of the quantitative analyses of propofol sulfate imply that propofol sulfate represents a minor metabolite of propofol and is only slightly involved in human propofol clearance.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Dr. Martin Kramer, Birgit Tersteegen, and Ilona Raith (Department for Pain Medicine, BG University Hospital Bergmannsheil) for their precious support during sampling and data acquisition. We also wish to thank Prof. Dr. Kernbach–Wighton for carefully proof-reading the manuscript.

  1. Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for all the contents of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.

  2. Research funding: None declared.

  3. Employment or leadership: None declared.

  4. Honorarium: None declared.

  5. Competing interests: The funding organization(s) played no role in the study design; in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; or in the decision to submit the report for publication.

References

1. Kotani Y, Shimazawa M, Yoshimura S, Iwama T, Hara H. The experimental and clinical pharmacology of propofol, an anesthetic agent with neuroprotective properties. CNS Neurosci Ther 2008;14:95–106.10.1111/j.1527-3458.2008.00043.xSearch in Google Scholar

2. Heuss LT, Schnieper P, Drewe J, Pflimlin E, Beglinger C. Safety of propofol for conscious sedation during endoscopic procedures in high-risk patients-a prospective, controlled study. Am J Gastroenterol 2003;98:1751–7.10.1111/j.1572-0241.2003.07596.xSearch in Google Scholar

3. Lamond DW. Review article: safety profile of propofol for paediatric procedural sedation in the emergency department. Emerg Med Australas 2010;22:265–86.10.1111/j.1742-6723.2010.01298.xSearch in Google Scholar

4. Follette JW, Farley WJ. Anesthesiologist addicted to propofol. J Am Soc Anesthesiol 1992;77:817–8.10.1097/00000542-199210000-00028Search in Google Scholar

5. Kranioti EF, Mavroforou A, Mylonakis P, Michalodimitrakis M. Lethal self administration of propofol (Diprivan). A case report and review of the literature. Forensic Sci Int [Internet]. 2007;167:56–8. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16431058.10.1016/j.forsciint.2005.12.027Search in Google Scholar

6. Roussin A, Montastruc JL, Lapeyre–Mestre M. Pharmacological and clinical evidences on the potential for abuse and dependence of propofol: a review of the literature. Fundam Clin Pharmacol 2007;21:459–65.10.1111/j.1472-8206.2007.00497.xSearch in Google Scholar

7. Maier C, Iwunna J, Tsokos M, Mußhoff F. Todesfälle durch Propofolmissbrauch. Anaesthesist. Springer Medizin 2017;13:1–6.10.1007/s00101-016-0260-6Search in Google Scholar

8. Simons PJ, Cockshott ID, Douglas EJ, Gordon EA, Hopkins K, Rowland M. Blood-concentrations, metabolism and elimination after a sub-anesthetic intravenous dose of C-14 propofol (Diprivan) to male-volunteers. Postgrad Med J 1985;61:64.Search in Google Scholar

9. Simons PJ, Cockshott ID, Douglas EJ, Gordon EA, Hopkins K, Rowland M. Disposition in male volunteers of a subanaesthetic intravenous dose of an oil in water emulsion of 14C-propofol. Xenobiotica 1988;18:429–40.10.3109/00498258809041679Search in Google Scholar

10. Le Guellec C, Lacarelle B, Villard PH, Point H, Catalin J, Durand A. Glucuronidation of propofol in microsomal fractions from various tissues and species including humans: effect of different drugs. Anesth Analg 1995;81:855–61.10.1213/00000539-199510000-00034Search in Google Scholar

11. Sneyd JR, Simons PJ, Wright B. Use of proton nmr spectroscopy to measure propofol metabolites in the urine of the female Caucasian patient. Xenobiotica 1994;24:1021–8.10.3109/00498259409043299Search in Google Scholar

12. Vree TB, de Grood PM, van Beem HB, Booij LH. Disposition and renal clearance of propofol and its glucuronide metabolites after a short intravenous infusion of propofol. Clin Drug Investig 1997;13:145–51.10.2165/00044011-199713030-00004Search in Google Scholar

13. Vree TB, Lagerwerf AJ, Bleeker CP, de Grood PM. Direct high-performance liquid chromatography determination of propofol and its metabolite quinol with their glucuronide conjugates and preliminary pharmacokinetics in plasma and urine of man. J Chromatogr B Biomed Sci Appl 1999;721:217–28.10.1016/S0378-4347(98)00466-6Search in Google Scholar

14. Favetta P, Dufresne C, Désage M, Païssé O, Perdrix JP, Boulieu R, et al. Detection of new propofol metabolites in human urine using gas chromatography/mass spectrometry and liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry techniques. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom 2000;14:1932–6.10.1002/1097-0231(20001030)14:20<1932::AID-RCM114>3.0.CO;2-PSearch in Google Scholar

15. Vree TB, Baars AM, de Grood PM. High-performance liquid chromatographic determination and preliminary pharmacokinetics of propofol and its metabolites in human plasma and urine. J Chromatogr 1987;417:458–64.10.1016/0378-4347(87)80145-7Search in Google Scholar

16. Cohen S, Lhuillier F, Mouloua Y, Vignal B, Favetta P, Guitton J. Quantitative measurement of propofol and in main glucuroconjugate metabolites in human plasma using solid phase extraction-liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci 2007;854:165–72.10.1016/j.jchromb.2007.04.021Search in Google Scholar PubMed

17. Simons PJ, Cockshott ID, Douglas EJ, Gordon EA, Knott S, Ruane RJ. Species differences in blood profiles, metabolism and excretion of 14C-propofol after intravenous dosing to rat, dog and rabbit. Xenobiotica 1991;21:1243–56.10.3109/00498259109043199Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Received: 2017-1-10
Accepted: 2017-1-27
Published Online: 2017-3-6
Published in Print: 2017-3-1

©2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 20.4.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/dmpt-2017-0003/html
Scroll to top button