previous article in this issue | next article in this issue |
Document Details : Title: Long-term symptomatic benefit after radiofrequency catheter ablation for atrial flutter despite a high incidence of post-procedural atrial fibrillation Author(s): ANNÉ, Wim , WILLEMS, Rik , ADRIAENSSENS, Bert , ADAMS, Jozef , ECTOR, Hugo , HEIDBÜCHEL, Hein Journal: Acta Cardiologica Volume: 61 Issue: 1 Date: February 2006 Pages: 75-82 DOI: 10.2143/AC.61.1.2005143 Abstract : Objective— A high proportion of patients develops atrial fibrillation (AF) after ablation for atrial flutter (AFL). Radiofrequency ablation for AFL therefore would only be useful if it leads to a better quality of life despite this high incidence of AF post-ablation. Methods— All patients who underwent AFL ablation in our centre before March 2002 (n=203) were contacted by letter a median of 2.3 years after their ablation. Sixty-eight percent answered the questionnaire polling the perceived benefits of the procedure. The results were stratified according to the presenting arrhythmia before the ablation:only AFL, predominantly AFL,predominantly AF or class Ic-III AFL. Results— Despite a 60% incidence of AF, 84% considered the procedure to be beneficial during the 1st year and 77% during the 2nd year post-ablation. Patients with predominantly AF before the procedure showed significantly less overall improvement than the 3 other groups (50% and 33% after 1 year and 2 years, p<0.01) and a smaller reduction in palpitations (50% and 29% after 1 year and 2 years, p<0.01).The benefit of an ablation was also significantly less in patients who developed AF post-ablation than in patients who were completely arrhythmia free (75% versus 98% 1st year, 58% versus 91% 2nd year; p<0.01); nevertheless 75% of these patients reported fewer palpitations and 56% tolerated symptoms better than before. Conclusions— Despite a high incidence of AF after AFL ablation,the majority of patients considered the intervention beneficial. Only in patients with predominantly AF before ablation the procedure does not seem beneficial. |