Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Drug Safety 4/2004

01.04.2004 | Leading Article

Pregnancy Exposure Registries

verfasst von: Dr Dianne L. Kennedy, Kathleen Uhl, Sandra L. Kweder

Erschienen in: Drug Safety | Ausgabe 4/2004

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Scientifically valid data on the safety of drug use during pregnancy are a significant public health need. Data are rarely available on the fetal effects of in utero exposure in human pregnancies, particularly when a drug is first marketed. Data from animal reproductive toxicology studies, which function as a screen for potential human teratogenicity, are usually all that is available in a product’s labelling. For practising clinicians, translating known animal risks into an accurate assessment of teratogenic risks in their patients is very difficult, if not impossible. Without human data on the effects of in utero drug exposure, it is difficult for physicians and other healthcare providers (e.g. genetic counsellors) to adequately counsel patients about fetal risks. Therefore, a pregnant woman may decide to unnecessarily terminate a wanted pregnancy or forego needed drug therapy. In spite of the lack of data on the safety of drug use during human pregnancies, pregnant women are exposed to drugs either as prescribed therapy or inadvertently before pregnancy is known (over one-half of pregnancies are unplanned). Because little is known about the teratogenic potential of a drug in humans before marketing, post-marketing surveillance of drug use in pregnancy is critical to the detection of drug-induced fetal effects. The existing passive mechanism of spontaneous reporting of adverse drug effects is inadequate to routinely detect drug-induced fetal risks or lack of such risks. Therefore, post-marketing pregnancy exposure registries are being increasingly used to proactively monitor for major fetal effects and to describe margins of safety associated with drug exposure during pregnancy. However, differing methodological rigour has been applied to the development of pregnancy exposure registries. It is important that all pregnancy registries develop epidemiologically sound written study protocols a priori. It is only through the use of rigourous methodology and procedures that data from pregnancy exposure registries will withstand scientific scrutiny. Successful recruitment of an adequate number of exposed pregnancies, aggressive follow-up, and complete and accurate ascertainment of pregnancy outcome are critical attributes of a well-designed registry.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration. Guideline for the study and evaluation of gender differences in the clinical evaluation of drugs. Fed Regist 1993; 58 (139): 39406–16 Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration. Guideline for the study and evaluation of gender differences in the clinical evaluation of drugs. Fed Regist 1993; 58 (139): 39406–16
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Mastroianni AC, Faden R, Federman D, editors. Risks to reproduction and offspring. In: Women and health research: ethical and legal issues of including women in clinical trials. Washington, DC: Natl Acad Sci Press, 1994: 175–202 Mastroianni AC, Faden R, Federman D, editors. Risks to reproduction and offspring. In: Women and health research: ethical and legal issues of including women in clinical trials. Washington, DC: Natl Acad Sci Press, 1994: 175–202
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Mitchell AA. Special considerations in studies of drug-induced birth defects. In: Strom BL, editor. Pharmacoepidemiology. 3rd ed. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons Ltd, 2000: 749–63CrossRef Mitchell AA. Special considerations in studies of drug-induced birth defects. In: Strom BL, editor. Pharmacoepidemiology. 3rd ed. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons Ltd, 2000: 749–63CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Ward RM. Difficulties in the study of adverse fetal and neonatal effects of drug therapy during pregnancy. Semin Perinatol 2001; 25(3): 191–5PubMedCrossRef Ward RM. Difficulties in the study of adverse fetal and neonatal effects of drug therapy during pregnancy. Semin Perinatol 2001; 25(3): 191–5PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Rogers JM, Kavlock RJ. Developmental toxicity. In: Klaassen CD, editor. Casarett & Doull’s Toxicology: the basic science of poisons. 6th ed. New York; McGraw-Hill, 2001: 351–85 Rogers JM, Kavlock RJ. Developmental toxicity. In: Klaassen CD, editor. Casarett & Doull’s Toxicology: the basic science of poisons. 6th ed. New York; McGraw-Hill, 2001: 351–85
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Schardein JL. Chemically induced birth defects. 3rd ed. New York: Marcel Dekker Inc., 2000 Schardein JL. Chemically induced birth defects. 3rd ed. New York: Marcel Dekker Inc., 2000
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Kaufman DW, Kelly JP, Rosenberg L, et al. Recent patterns of medication use in the ambulatory adult population of the United States. JAMA 2002 Jan 16; 287(3): 337–44PubMedCrossRef Kaufman DW, Kelly JP, Rosenberg L, et al. Recent patterns of medication use in the ambulatory adult population of the United States. JAMA 2002 Jan 16; 287(3): 337–44PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Colley GB, Brantley MD, Larson MK. 1997 family planning practices and pregnancy intention. Atlanta (GA): Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2000 Colley GB, Brantley MD, Larson MK. 1997 family planning practices and pregnancy intention. Atlanta (GA): Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2000
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Ventura SJ, Mosher WD, Curtin SC, et al. Trends in pregnancies and pregnancy rates by outcome, United States, 1976-96. National Center for Health Statistics. Vital Health Stat 2000; 21(56): 1–47 Ventura SJ, Mosher WD, Curtin SC, et al. Trends in pregnancies and pregnancy rates by outcome, United States, 1976-96. National Center for Health Statistics. Vital Health Stat 2000; 21(56): 1–47
10.
Zurück zum Zitat De Vigan C, De Walle HEK, Cordier S, et al. Therapeutic drug use during pregnancy: a comparison in four European countries. J Clin Epidemiol 1999; 52(10): 977–82PubMedCrossRef De Vigan C, De Walle HEK, Cordier S, et al. Therapeutic drug use during pregnancy: a comparison in four European countries. J Clin Epidemiol 1999; 52(10): 977–82PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Lacroix I, Damase-Michel C, Lapeyre-Mestre M, et al. Prescription of drugs during pregnancy in France. Lancet 2000; 356: 1735–6PubMedCrossRef Lacroix I, Damase-Michel C, Lapeyre-Mestre M, et al. Prescription of drugs during pregnancy in France. Lancet 2000; 356: 1735–6PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Mitchell AA, Hernandez-Diaz S, Louik C, et al. Medication use in pregnancy; 1976-2000 [abstract]. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2001; 10Suppl. 1: S146 Mitchell AA, Hernandez-Diaz S, Louik C, et al. Medication use in pregnancy; 1976-2000 [abstract]. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2001; 10Suppl. 1: S146
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Kennedy D, Goldman S, Lillie R. Spontaneous reporting in the United States. In: Strom B, editor. Pharmacoepidemiology. 3rd ed. Chichester; John Wiley & Sons Ltd, 2000: 151–74 Kennedy D, Goldman S, Lillie R. Spontaneous reporting in the United States. In: Strom B, editor. Pharmacoepidemiology. 3rd ed. Chichester; John Wiley & Sons Ltd, 2000: 151–74
17.
Zurück zum Zitat International Society for Pharmacoepidemiology. Guidelines for good epidemiology practices for drug, device, and vaccine research in the United States. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 1996; 5: 333–8 International Society for Pharmacoepidemiology. Guidelines for good epidemiology practices for drug, device, and vaccine research in the United States. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 1996; 5: 333–8
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Strom BL, editor. Pharmacoepidemiology. 3rd ed. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons Ltd, 2000 Strom BL, editor. Pharmacoepidemiology. 3rd ed. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons Ltd, 2000
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Hartzema AG, Porta M, Tilson HH, editors. Pharmacoepidemiology: an introduction. 3rd ed. Cincinnati (OH): Harvey Whitney Books, 1998 Hartzema AG, Porta M, Tilson HH, editors. Pharmacoepidemiology: an introduction. 3rd ed. Cincinnati (OH): Harvey Whitney Books, 1998
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Honein MA, Paulozzi LJ, Cragan JD, et al. Evaluation of selected characteristics of pregnancy drug registries. Teratology 1999; 60: 356–64PubMedCrossRef Honein MA, Paulozzi LJ, Cragan JD, et al. Evaluation of selected characteristics of pregnancy drug registries. Teratology 1999; 60: 356–64PubMedCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Strom BL. Sample size considerations for pharmacoepidemiology studies. In: Strom BL, editor. Pharmacoepidemiology. 3rd ed. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons Ltd, 2000: 31–9CrossRef Strom BL. Sample size considerations for pharmacoepidemiology studies. In: Strom BL, editor. Pharmacoepidemiology. 3rd ed. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons Ltd, 2000: 31–9CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Gail M. Computations for designing comparative poisson trials. Biometrics 1974; 30: 231–7CrossRef Gail M. Computations for designing comparative poisson trials. Biometrics 1974; 30: 231–7CrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Sumatriptan/naratriptan and lamotrigine pregnancy registries interim reports. PharmaResearch Corporation, Wilmington (NC), USA 28403. 800–336–2176 Sumatriptan/naratriptan and lamotrigine pregnancy registries interim reports. PharmaResearch Corporation, Wilmington (NC), USA 28403. 800–336–2176
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Reiff-Eldridge R, Heffner CR, Ephross SA, et al. Monitoring pregnancy outcomes after prenatal drug exposure through prospective pregnancy exposure registries: a pharmaceutical company commitment. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000; 182: 159–63PubMedCrossRef Reiff-Eldridge R, Heffner CR, Ephross SA, et al. Monitoring pregnancy outcomes after prenatal drug exposure through prospective pregnancy exposure registries: a pharmaceutical company commitment. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000; 182: 159–63PubMedCrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat The North American Pregnancy and Epilepsy Registry. A North American registry for epilepsy and pregnancy, a unique public/private partnership of health surveillance. Epilepsia 1998; 39 (7): 793–8 The North American Pregnancy and Epilepsy Registry. A North American registry for epilepsy and pregnancy, a unique public/private partnership of health surveillance. Epilepsia 1998; 39 (7): 793–8
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Chambers CD, Braddock SR, Briggs GG, et al. Postmarketing surveillance for human teratogenicity: a model approach. Teratology 2001; 64(5): 252–61PubMedCrossRef Chambers CD, Braddock SR, Briggs GG, et al. Postmarketing surveillance for human teratogenicity: a model approach. Teratology 2001; 64(5): 252–61PubMedCrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Shields KE, Gahil K, Seward J, et al. Varicella vaccine exposure during pregnancy: data from the first five years of the pregnancy registry. Obstet Gynecol 2001; 98: 14–9PubMedCrossRef Shields KE, Gahil K, Seward J, et al. Varicella vaccine exposure during pregnancy: data from the first five years of the pregnancy registry. Obstet Gynecol 2001; 98: 14–9PubMedCrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Holmes LB. Editorial: need for inclusion and exclusion criteria for the structural abnormalities recorded in children born from exposed pregnancies. Teratology 1999; 59: 1–2PubMedCrossRef Holmes LB. Editorial: need for inclusion and exclusion criteria for the structural abnormalities recorded in children born from exposed pregnancies. Teratology 1999; 59: 1–2PubMedCrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Ellish NJ, Saboda K, O’Connor J, et al. A prospective study of early pregnancy loss. Hum Reprod 1996; 11: 406–12PubMedCrossRef Ellish NJ, Saboda K, O’Connor J, et al. A prospective study of early pregnancy loss. Hum Reprod 1996; 11: 406–12PubMedCrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Metropolitan Atlanta congenital defects program procedure manual and guide to computerized anomaly record. Atlanta (GA): 1998: A32–A100 US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Metropolitan Atlanta congenital defects program procedure manual and guide to computerized anomaly record. Atlanta (GA): 1998: A32–A100
31.
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Leippig KA, Werler MM, Can CI, et al. Predictive value of minor anomalies: I. Association with major malformations. J Pediatr 1987; 110: 530–7 Leippig KA, Werler MM, Can CI, et al. Predictive value of minor anomalies: I. Association with major malformations. J Pediatr 1987; 110: 530–7
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Khoury MJ, Moore CA, James LM, et al. The interaction between dysmorphology and epidemiology: methodologic issues of lumping and splitting. Teratology 1992; 45(2): 133–8PubMedCrossRef Khoury MJ, Moore CA, James LM, et al. The interaction between dysmorphology and epidemiology: methodologic issues of lumping and splitting. Teratology 1992; 45(2): 133–8PubMedCrossRef
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Scheurle A, Tilson H. Birth defect classification by organ system: a novel approach to heighten teratogenic signaling in a pregnancy registry. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2002; 11: 1–11CrossRef Scheurle A, Tilson H. Birth defect classification by organ system: a novel approach to heighten teratogenic signaling in a pregnancy registry. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2002; 11: 1–11CrossRef
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Edmonds LD, Layde PM, James LM, et al. Congenital malformations surveillance: two American systems. Int J Epidemiol 1981; 10: 247–52PubMedCrossRef Edmonds LD, Layde PM, James LM, et al. Congenital malformations surveillance: two American systems. Int J Epidemiol 1981; 10: 247–52PubMedCrossRef
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Goldstein DJ, Sundell KL, DeBrota DJ, et al. Determination of pregnancy outcome risk rates after exposure to an intervention. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2001; 69: 7–13PubMedCrossRef Goldstein DJ, Sundell KL, DeBrota DJ, et al. Determination of pregnancy outcome risk rates after exposure to an intervention. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2001; 69: 7–13PubMedCrossRef
41.
Zurück zum Zitat US Federal Regulations on the Protection of Human Subjects. 45 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) parts 46 & 164 and 21 CFR parts 50 & 56 [online]. Available from URL: http://www.access.gpo.gov/nara [Accessed 2003 Jan 2] US Federal Regulations on the Protection of Human Subjects. 45 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) parts 46 & 164 and 21 CFR parts 50 & 56 [online]. Available from URL: http://​www.​access.​gpo.​gov/​nara [Accessed 2003 Jan 2]
44.
Zurück zum Zitat White A, Eldridge R, Andrews E. Birth outcomes following zidovudine exposure in pregnant women: the antiretroviral pregnancy exposure registry. Acta Paediatr Suppl 1997; 421: 86–8PubMedCrossRef White A, Eldridge R, Andrews E. Birth outcomes following zidovudine exposure in pregnant women: the antiretroviral pregnancy exposure registry. Acta Paediatr Suppl 1997; 421: 86–8PubMedCrossRef
45.
Zurück zum Zitat Lipkowitz MA. The American College of Allergy, Asthma, and Immunology Registry for allergic, asthmatic pregnant patients (RAAPP). J Allergy Clin Immunol 1999; 103: S364–72PubMedCrossRef Lipkowitz MA. The American College of Allergy, Asthma, and Immunology Registry for allergic, asthmatic pregnant patients (RAAPP). J Allergy Clin Immunol 1999; 103: S364–72PubMedCrossRef
46.
Zurück zum Zitat Scialli AR. The Organization of Teratology Information Services (OTIS) registry study. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1999; 103: S373–6PubMedCrossRef Scialli AR. The Organization of Teratology Information Services (OTIS) registry study. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1999; 103: S373–6PubMedCrossRef
47.
Zurück zum Zitat Mitchell AA. Systematic identification of drugs that cause birth defects: a new opportunity. N Engl J Med 2003 Dec 25; 349(26): 2556–9PubMedCrossRef Mitchell AA. Systematic identification of drugs that cause birth defects: a new opportunity. N Engl J Med 2003 Dec 25; 349(26): 2556–9PubMedCrossRef
48.
53.
Zurück zum Zitat Kweder SL, Kennedy DL, Rodriguez E. Turning the wheels of change: FDA and pregnancy labeling. The International Society for Pharmacoepidemiology, Scribe Newsletter 2000; 3(4): 2–4, 10 Kweder SL, Kennedy DL, Rodriguez E. Turning the wheels of change: FDA and pregnancy labeling. The International Society for Pharmacoepidemiology, Scribe Newsletter 2000; 3(4): 2–4, 10
Metadaten
Titel
Pregnancy Exposure Registries
verfasst von
Dr Dianne L. Kennedy
Kathleen Uhl
Sandra L. Kweder
Publikationsdatum
01.04.2004
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
Drug Safety / Ausgabe 4/2004
Print ISSN: 0114-5916
Elektronische ISSN: 1179-1942
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2165/00002018-200427040-00001