Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Clinical Pharmacokinetics 6/2009

01.06.2009 | Original Research Article

Pharmacokinetically Based Estimation of Patient Compliance with Oral Anticancer Chemotherapies

In Silico Evaluation

verfasst von: Dr Emilie Hénin, Michel Tod, Véronique Trillet-Lenoir, Catherine Rioufol, Brigitte Tranchand, Pascal Girard

Erschienen in: Clinical Pharmacokinetics | Ausgabe 6/2009

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background and objectives

More and more anticancer chemotherapies are now available as oral formulations. This relatively new route of administration in oncology leads to problems with patient education and non-compliance. The aim of this study was to explore the performances of the ‘inverse problem’, namely, estimation of compliance from pharmacokinetics. For this purpose, we developed and evaluated a method to estimate patient compliance with an oral chemotherapy in silico (i) from an a priori population pharmacokinetic model; (ii) with limited optimal pharmacokinetic information collected on day 1; and (iii) from a single pharmacokinetic sample collected after multiple doses.

Methods

Population pharmacokinetic models, including estimation of all fixed and random effects estimated on a prior dataset, and sparse samples taken after the first dose, were combined to provide the individual POSTHOC Bayesian pharmacokinetic parameter estimates. Sampling times on day 1 were chosen according to a D-optimal design. Individual pharmacokinetic profiles were simulated according to various dose-taking scenarios.
To characterize compliance over the n previous dosing times (supposedly known without error), 2n different compliance scenarios of doses taken/not taken were considered. The observed concentration value was compared with concentrations predicted from the model and each compliance scenario. To discriminate between different compliance profiles, we used the Euclidean distance between the observed pharmacokinetic values and the predicted values simulated without residual errors.
This approach was evaluated in silico and applied to imatinib and capecitabine, the pharmacokinetics of which are described in the literature, and which have quite different pharmacokinetic characteristics (imatinib has an elimination half-life of 17 hours, and α-fluoro-β-alanine [FBAL], the metabolite of capecitabine, has an elimination half-life of 3 hours). 1000 parameter sets were drawn according to population distributions, and concentration values were simulated at several timepoints under various compliance patterns to compare with the predicted ones. In addition, several simulation scenarios were run in order to explore the impact of the quality of the error model, interoccasion variability (IOV), error in the number of pills taken, and the performance of the compliance estimation method.

Results

The best compliance estimate was obtained with pharmacokinetic samples taken 5 hours after the last dose. Performance of the method varied between simulation scenarios. In both the imatinib and capecitabine basic simulations, patient compliance was correctly estimated on the two last scheduled doses (with better results for imatinib). The magnitude of the error model also had a great impact on the quality of the compliance estimate.

Conclusions

We highlight the effect of three parameters on the quality of compliance estimates based on limited pharmacokinetic information: the plasma elimination half-life, interdose interval and magnitude of the error model. Nevertheless, the pharmacokinetic method is not informative enough and should be used with electronic monitoring, which provides additional information on compliance. Our method will be used in a future phase IV clinical trial where the relationships between compliance, efficacy and tolerability will be assessed.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Liu G, Franssen E, Fitch MI, et al. Patient preferences for oral versus intravenous palliative chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 1997 Jan; 15(1): 110–5PubMed Liu G, Franssen E, Fitch MI, et al. Patient preferences for oral versus intravenous palliative chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 1997 Jan; 15(1): 110–5PubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Chau I, Legge S, Fumoleau P. The vital role of education and information in patients receiving capecitabine (Xeloda®). Eur J Oncol Nurs 2004; 8(3 Suppl.): S41–53PubMedCrossRef Chau I, Legge S, Fumoleau P. The vital role of education and information in patients receiving capecitabine (Xeloda®). Eur J Oncol Nurs 2004; 8(3 Suppl.): S41–53PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Gerbrecht BM, Kangas T. Implications of capecitabine (Xeloda®) for cancer nursing practice. Eur J Oncol Nurs 2004; 8(3 Suppl.): S63–71PubMedCrossRef Gerbrecht BM, Kangas T. Implications of capecitabine (Xeloda®) for cancer nursing practice. Eur J Oncol Nurs 2004; 8(3 Suppl.): S63–71PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Grober SE, Carpenter RC, Glassman M, et al. A comparison of patients’ perceptions of oral cancer treatments and intravenous cancer treatments: what the health care team needs to know [abstract no. 3000]. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 2003; 22: 746 Grober SE, Carpenter RC, Glassman M, et al. A comparison of patients’ perceptions of oral cancer treatments and intravenous cancer treatments: what the health care team needs to know [abstract no. 3000]. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 2003; 22: 746
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Catania C, Didier F, Sbanotto A, et al. Fully oral chemotherapy regimens: patient’s or physician’s preference [abstract no. 3122]. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 2003; 22: 777 Catania C, Didier F, Sbanotto A, et al. Fully oral chemotherapy regimens: patient’s or physician’s preference [abstract no. 3122]. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 2003; 22: 777
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Waterhouse DM, Calzone KA, Mele C, et al. Adherence to oral tamoxifen: a comparison of patient self-report, pill counts, and microelectronic monitoring. J Clin Oncol 1993 Jun; 11(6): 1189–97PubMed Waterhouse DM, Calzone KA, Mele C, et al. Adherence to oral tamoxifen: a comparison of patient self-report, pill counts, and microelectronic monitoring. J Clin Oncol 1993 Jun; 11(6): 1189–97PubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Partridge AH, Avorn J, Wang PS, et al. Adherence to therapy with oral antineoplastic agents. J Natl Cancer Inst 2002 May 1; 94(9): 652–61PubMedCrossRef Partridge AH, Avorn J, Wang PS, et al. Adherence to therapy with oral antineoplastic agents. J Natl Cancer Inst 2002 May 1; 94(9): 652–61PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Urquhart J, De Klerk E. Contending paradigms for the interpretation of data on patient compliance with therapeutic drug regimens. Stat Med 1998 Feb 15; 17(3): 251–67PubMedCrossRef Urquhart J, De Klerk E. Contending paradigms for the interpretation of data on patient compliance with therapeutic drug regimens. Stat Med 1998 Feb 15; 17(3): 251–67PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Zeppetella G. How do terminally ill patients at home take their medication?. Palliat Med 1999 Nov; 13(6): 469–75PubMedCrossRef Zeppetella G. How do terminally ill patients at home take their medication?. Palliat Med 1999 Nov; 13(6): 469–75PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Iskedjian M, Einarson TR, MacKeigan LD, et al. Relationship between daily dose frequency and adherence to antihypertensive pharmacotherapy: evidence from a meta-analysis. Clin Ther 2002 Feb; 24(2): 302–16PubMedCrossRef Iskedjian M, Einarson TR, MacKeigan LD, et al. Relationship between daily dose frequency and adherence to antihypertensive pharmacotherapy: evidence from a meta-analysis. Clin Ther 2002 Feb; 24(2): 302–16PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Mu S, Ludden TM. Estimation of population pharmacokinetic parameters in the presence of non-compliance. J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn 2003 Feb; 30(1): 53–81PubMedCrossRef Mu S, Ludden TM. Estimation of population pharmacokinetic parameters in the presence of non-compliance. J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn 2003 Feb; 30(1): 53–81PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Cramer JA, Mattson RH, Prevey ML, et al. How often is medication taken as prescribed? A novel assessment technique. JAMA 1989 Jun 9; 261(22): 3273–7PubMedCrossRef Cramer JA, Mattson RH, Prevey ML, et al. How often is medication taken as prescribed? A novel assessment technique. JAMA 1989 Jun 9; 261(22): 3273–7PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat De Tullio PL, Kirking DM, Arslanian C, et al. Compliance measure development and assessment of theophylline therapy in ambulatory patients. J Clin Pharm Ther 1987 Feb; 12(1): 19–26PubMed De Tullio PL, Kirking DM, Arslanian C, et al. Compliance measure development and assessment of theophylline therapy in ambulatory patients. J Clin Pharm Ther 1987 Feb; 12(1): 19–26PubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Jonsson EN, Wade JR, Almqvist G, et al. Discrimination between rival dosing histories. Pharm Res 1997 Aug; 14(8): 984–91PubMedCrossRef Jonsson EN, Wade JR, Almqvist G, et al. Discrimination between rival dosing histories. Pharm Res 1997 Aug; 14(8): 984–91PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Pullar T, Kumar S, Tindall H, et al. Time to stop counting the tablets?. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1989 Aug; 46(2): 163–8PubMedCrossRef Pullar T, Kumar S, Tindall H, et al. Time to stop counting the tablets?. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1989 Aug; 46(2): 163–8PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Urquhart J. The electronic medication event monitor: lessons for pharmacotherapy. Clin Pharmacokinet 1997 May; 32(5): 345–56PubMedCrossRef Urquhart J. The electronic medication event monitor: lessons for pharmacotherapy. Clin Pharmacokinet 1997 May; 32(5): 345–56PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Feldman HI, Hackett M, Bilker W, et al. Potential utility of electronic drug compliance monitoring in measures of adverse outcomes associated with immunosuppressive agents. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 1999 Jan; 8(1): 1–14PubMedCrossRef Feldman HI, Hackett M, Bilker W, et al. Potential utility of electronic drug compliance monitoring in measures of adverse outcomes associated with immunosuppressive agents. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 1999 Jan; 8(1): 1–14PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Rudd P. In search of the gold standard for compliance measurement. Arch Intern Med 1979 Jun; 139(6): 627–8PubMedCrossRef Rudd P. In search of the gold standard for compliance measurement. Arch Intern Med 1979 Jun; 139(6): 627–8PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Levine AM, Richardson JL, Marks G, et al. Compliance with oral drug therapy in patients with hematologic malignancy. J Clin Oncol 1987 Sep; 5(9): 1469–76PubMed Levine AM, Richardson JL, Marks G, et al. Compliance with oral drug therapy in patients with hematologic malignancy. J Clin Oncol 1987 Sep; 5(9): 1469–76PubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Urquhart J. Role of patient compliance in clinical pharmacokinetics: a review of recent research. Clin Pharmacokinet 1994 Sep; 27(3): 202–15PubMedCrossRef Urquhart J. Role of patient compliance in clinical pharmacokinetics: a review of recent research. Clin Pharmacokinet 1994 Sep; 27(3): 202–15PubMedCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Lim LL. Estimating compliance to study medication from serum drug levels: application to an AIDS clinical trial of zidovudine. Biometrics 1992 Jun; 48(2): 619–30PubMedCrossRef Lim LL. Estimating compliance to study medication from serum drug levels: application to an AIDS clinical trial of zidovudine. Biometrics 1992 Jun; 48(2): 619–30PubMedCrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Rubio A, Cox C, Weintraub M. Prediction of diltiazem plasma concentration curves from limited measurements using compliance data. Clin Pharmacokinet 1992 Mar; 22(3): 238–46PubMedCrossRef Rubio A, Cox C, Weintraub M. Prediction of diltiazem plasma concentration curves from limited measurements using compliance data. Clin Pharmacokinet 1992 Mar; 22(3): 238–46PubMedCrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Pullar T, Kumar S, Chrystyn H, et al. The prediction of steady-state plasma phenobarbitone concentrations (following low-dose phenobarbitone) to refine its use as an indicator of compliance. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1991 Sep; 32(3): 329–33PubMedCrossRef Pullar T, Kumar S, Chrystyn H, et al. The prediction of steady-state plasma phenobarbitone concentrations (following low-dose phenobarbitone) to refine its use as an indicator of compliance. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1991 Sep; 32(3): 329–33PubMedCrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Vrijens B, Tousset E, Rode R, et al. Successful projection of the time course of drug concentration in plasma during a 1-year period from electronically compiled dosing-time data used as input to individually parameterized pharmacokinetic models. J Clin Pharmacol 2005 Apr; 45(4): 461–7PubMedCrossRef Vrijens B, Tousset E, Rode R, et al. Successful projection of the time course of drug concentration in plasma during a 1-year period from electronically compiled dosing-time data used as input to individually parameterized pharmacokinetic models. J Clin Pharmacol 2005 Apr; 45(4): 461–7PubMedCrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Santschi V, Wuerzner G, Schneider MP, et al. Clinical evaluation of IDAS II, a new electronic device enabling drug adherence monitoring. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 2007 Dec; 63(12): 1179–84PubMedCrossRef Santschi V, Wuerzner G, Schneider MP, et al. Clinical evaluation of IDAS II, a new electronic device enabling drug adherence monitoring. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 2007 Dec; 63(12): 1179–84PubMedCrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Duffull S, Denman M, Eccleston J, et al. WinPOPT user guide (version 1.1). Dunedin: University of Otago, 2006 Duffull S, Denman M, Eccleston J, et al. WinPOPT user guide (version 1.1). Dunedin: University of Otago, 2006
27.
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Beal SL, Sheiner LB. NONMEM user’s guides. San Francisco (CA): NONMEM Project Group, University of California, 1992 Beal SL, Sheiner LB. NONMEM user’s guides. San Francisco (CA): NONMEM Project Group, University of California, 1992
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Insightful Corporation. S-Plus 6 user’s guide. Seattle (WA): Insightful Corporation, 2002 Insightful Corporation. S-Plus 6 user’s guide. Seattle (WA): Insightful Corporation, 2002
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Widmer N, Decosterd LA, Csajka C, et al. Population pharmacokinetics of imatinib and the role of alpha-acid glycoprotein. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2006 Jul; 62(1): 97–112PubMedCrossRef Widmer N, Decosterd LA, Csajka C, et al. Population pharmacokinetics of imatinib and the role of alpha-acid glycoprotein. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2006 Jul; 62(1): 97–112PubMedCrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Gieschke R, Reigner B, Blesch KS, et al. Population pharmacokinetic analysis of the major metabolites of capecitabine. J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn 2002 Feb; 29(1): 25–47PubMedCrossRef Gieschke R, Reigner B, Blesch KS, et al. Population pharmacokinetic analysis of the major metabolites of capecitabine. J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn 2002 Feb; 29(1): 25–47PubMedCrossRef
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Reigner B, Blesch K, Weidekamm E. Clinical pharmacokinetics of capecitabine. Clin Pharmacokinet 2001; 40(2): 85–104PubMedCrossRef Reigner B, Blesch K, Weidekamm E. Clinical pharmacokinetics of capecitabine. Clin Pharmacokinet 2001; 40(2): 85–104PubMedCrossRef
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Wang W, Husan F, Chow SC. The impact of patient compliance on drug concentration profile in multiple doses. Stat Med 1996 Mar 30; 15(6): 659–69PubMedCrossRef Wang W, Husan F, Chow SC. The impact of patient compliance on drug concentration profile in multiple doses. Stat Med 1996 Mar 30; 15(6): 659–69PubMedCrossRef
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Girard P, Sheiner LB, Kastrissios H, et al. Do we need full compliance data for population pharmacokinetic analysis?. J Pharmacokinet Biopharm 1996 Jun; 24(3): 265–82PubMed Girard P, Sheiner LB, Kastrissios H, et al. Do we need full compliance data for population pharmacokinetic analysis?. J Pharmacokinet Biopharm 1996 Jun; 24(3): 265–82PubMed
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Li J, Nekka F. A pharmacokinetic formalism explicitly integrating the patient drug compliance. J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn 2007 Feb; 34(1): 115–39PubMedCrossRef Li J, Nekka F. A pharmacokinetic formalism explicitly integrating the patient drug compliance. J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn 2007 Feb; 34(1): 115–39PubMedCrossRef
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Lu J, Gries JM, Verotta D, et al. Selecting reliable pharmacokinetic data for explanatory analyses of clinical trials in the presence of possible noncompliance. J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn 2001 Aug; 28(4): 343–62PubMedCrossRef Lu J, Gries JM, Verotta D, et al. Selecting reliable pharmacokinetic data for explanatory analyses of clinical trials in the presence of possible noncompliance. J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn 2001 Aug; 28(4): 343–62PubMedCrossRef
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Kshirsagar SA, Blaschke TF, Sheiner LB, et al. Improving data reliability using a non-compliance detection method versus using pharmacokinetic criteria. J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn 2007 Feb; 34(1): 35–55PubMedCrossRef Kshirsagar SA, Blaschke TF, Sheiner LB, et al. Improving data reliability using a non-compliance detection method versus using pharmacokinetic criteria. J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn 2007 Feb; 34(1): 35–55PubMedCrossRef
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Gupta P, Hutmacher MM, Frame B, et al. An alternative method for population pharmacokinetic data analysis under noncompliance. J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn 2008 Apr; 35(2): 219–33PubMedCrossRef Gupta P, Hutmacher MM, Frame B, et al. An alternative method for population pharmacokinetic data analysis under noncompliance. J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn 2008 Apr; 35(2): 219–33PubMedCrossRef
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Soy D, Beal SL, Sheiner LB. Population one-compartment pharmacokinetic analysis with missing dosage data. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2004 Nov; 76(5): 441–51PubMedCrossRef Soy D, Beal SL, Sheiner LB. Population one-compartment pharmacokinetic analysis with missing dosage data. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2004 Nov; 76(5): 441–51PubMedCrossRef
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Girard P, Blaschke TF, Kastrissios H, et al. A Markov mixed effect regression model for drug compliance. Stat Med 1998 Oct 30; 17(20): 2313–33PubMedCrossRef Girard P, Blaschke TF, Kastrissios H, et al. A Markov mixed effect regression model for drug compliance. Stat Med 1998 Oct 30; 17(20): 2313–33PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Pharmacokinetically Based Estimation of Patient Compliance with Oral Anticancer Chemotherapies
In Silico Evaluation
verfasst von
Dr Emilie Hénin
Michel Tod
Véronique Trillet-Lenoir
Catherine Rioufol
Brigitte Tranchand
Pascal Girard
Publikationsdatum
01.06.2009
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
Clinical Pharmacokinetics / Ausgabe 6/2009
Print ISSN: 0312-5963
Elektronische ISSN: 1179-1926
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2165/00003088-200948060-00002

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2009

Clinical Pharmacokinetics 6/2009 Zur Ausgabe