Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Drugs 1/2006

01.01.2006 | Review Article

Premixed Insulin Analogues for the Treatment of Diabetes Mellitus

verfasst von: Dr Alan J. Garber

Erschienen in: Drugs | Ausgabe 1/2006

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Premixed insulin analogues, consisting of rapid-acting and intermediate-acting insulin analogues, were developed to more closely mimic physiological endogenous insulin secretion and meet the needs of patients who require both basal and prandial insulin but wish to limit the number of daily injections.
There is considerable variability in onset and duration of action, as well as peak insulin levels, obtained with human insulin formulations such as premixed human insulin 70/30. To overcome these limitations, premixed insulin analogues were developed. Peak insulin levels are twice as high and reached in half the time with the rapid-acting insulin component of a premixed insulin analogue.
In the US, two premixed insulin analogue formulations are currently available: insulin lispro 75/25 (75% insulin lispro protamine suspension and 25% insulin lispro) and biphasic insulin aspart 70/30 (BIAsp 70/30; 70% insulin aspart protamine suspension and 30% insulin aspart). They are generally administered twice daily, just before breakfast and dinner. Data from various randomised trials show that both insulin lispro 75/25 and BIAsp 70/30 provide more effective postprandial control of blood glucose than premixed human insulin 70/30 or human insulin isophane suspension (NPH insulin). Longer-term glycaemic control, evaluated as changes in glycosylated haemoglobin, is comparable for premixed insulin analogues and premixed human insulin 70/30 in most studies. Three comparative, randomised trials have shown that patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus using premixed insulin analogues twice daily are more likely to reach glycaemic goals than those using only insulin glargine once daily. Some patients can also reach glycaemic goals with once-daily administration of a premixed insulin analogue.
Although the incidence of hypoglycaemia is low, direct comparison across trials of premixed insulin analogues is difficult because of inconsistencies in reporting. Within trials, the incidence of both major (rare) and minor hypoglycaemic episodes during treatment with premixed insulin analogues is low and comparable with rates found with human insulin 70/30.
Premixed insulin analogues can be safely used, and are effective and convenient for achieving overall glycaemic control in patients with diabetes. In addition, given the convenience of mealtime dose administration, compliance with insulin therapy may increase with premixed insulin analogues.
Fußnoten
1
The use of trade names is for product identification purposes only and does not imply endorsement.
 
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Wright A, Burden AC, Paisey RB, et al. Sulfonylurea inadequacy: efficacy of addition of insulin over 6 years in patients with type 2 diabetes in the UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS 57). Diabetes Care 2002; 25: 330–6PubMedCrossRef Wright A, Burden AC, Paisey RB, et al. Sulfonylurea inadequacy: efficacy of addition of insulin over 6 years in patients with type 2 diabetes in the UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS 57). Diabetes Care 2002; 25: 330–6PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat DeWitt DE, Hirsch IB. Outpatient insulin therapy in type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus: scientific review. JAMA 2003; 289: 2254–64PubMedCrossRef DeWitt DE, Hirsch IB. Outpatient insulin therapy in type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus: scientific review. JAMA 2003; 289: 2254–64PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Oiknine R, Bernbaum M, Mooradian AD. A critical appraisal of the role of insulin analogues in the management of diabetes mellitus. Drugs 2005; 65(3): 325–40PubMedCrossRef Oiknine R, Bernbaum M, Mooradian AD. A critical appraisal of the role of insulin analogues in the management of diabetes mellitus. Drugs 2005; 65(3): 325–40PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Rolla AR, Rakel RE. Practical approaches to insulin therapy for type 2 diabetes mellitus with premixed insulin analogues. Clin Ther 2005; 27: 1113–25PubMedCrossRef Rolla AR, Rakel RE. Practical approaches to insulin therapy for type 2 diabetes mellitus with premixed insulin analogues. Clin Ther 2005; 27: 1113–25PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Jain R, Allen E, Wahl T, et al. Efficacy of biphasic insulin aspart 70/30 in patients with T2DM not achieving glycemic targets on OADs with/without basal insulin therapy [abstract]. Diabetes 2005; 54 Suppl. 1: A69CrossRef Jain R, Allen E, Wahl T, et al. Efficacy of biphasic insulin aspart 70/30 in patients with T2DM not achieving glycemic targets on OADs with/without basal insulin therapy [abstract]. Diabetes 2005; 54 Suppl. 1: A69CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Chan JL, Abrahamson MJ. Pharmacological management of type 2 diabetes mellitus: rationale for rational use of insulin. Mayo Clin Proc 2003; 78: 459–67PubMedCrossRef Chan JL, Abrahamson MJ. Pharmacological management of type 2 diabetes mellitus: rationale for rational use of insulin. Mayo Clin Proc 2003; 78: 459–67PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group, DCCT Research Group. The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med 1993; 329: 977–86CrossRef Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group, DCCT Research Group. The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med 1993; 329: 977–86CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group. Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33). Lancet 1998; 352: 837–53CrossRef UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group. Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33). Lancet 1998; 352: 837–53CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat UK Prospective Diabetes Study Group. Effect of intensive blood-glucose control with metformin on complications in overweight patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 34). Lancet 1998; 352: 854–65CrossRef UK Prospective Diabetes Study Group. Effect of intensive blood-glucose control with metformin on complications in overweight patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 34). Lancet 1998; 352: 854–65CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Ohkubo Y, Kishikawa H, Araki E, et al. Intensive insulin therapy prevents the progression of diabetic microvascular complications in Japanese patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus: a randomized prospective 6-year study. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 1995; 28: 103–17PubMedCrossRef Ohkubo Y, Kishikawa H, Araki E, et al. Intensive insulin therapy prevents the progression of diabetic microvascular complications in Japanese patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus: a randomized prospective 6-year study. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 1995; 28: 103–17PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care for patients with diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care 2001; 24 Suppl. 1: S33–43CrossRef American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care for patients with diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care 2001; 24 Suppl. 1: S33–43CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat American College of Endocrinology. American College of Endocrinology consensus statement on guidelines for glycemic control. Endocr Pract 2002; 8 Suppl. 1: 5–11 American College of Endocrinology. American College of Endocrinology consensus statement on guidelines for glycemic control. Endocr Pract 2002; 8 Suppl. 1: 5–11
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Standl E. International Diabetes Federation European Policy group standards for diabetes. Endocr Pract 2002; 8 Suppl. 1: 37–40 Standl E. International Diabetes Federation European Policy group standards for diabetes. Endocr Pract 2002; 8 Suppl. 1: 37–40
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Heller S. Reducing hypoglycaemia with insulin analogues. Int J Obes 2002; 26 Suppl. 3: S31–36CrossRef Heller S. Reducing hypoglycaemia with insulin analogues. Int J Obes 2002; 26 Suppl. 3: S31–36CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat DECODE study group. Glucose tolerance and mortality: comparison of WHO and American Diabetes Association diagnostic criteria. Lancet 1999; 354: 617–21CrossRef DECODE study group. Glucose tolerance and mortality: comparison of WHO and American Diabetes Association diagnostic criteria. Lancet 1999; 354: 617–21CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Hanefeld M, Fischer S, Julius U, et al. Risk factors for myocardial infarction and death in newly detected NIDDM: the diabetes intervention study, 11-year follow-up. Diabetologia 1996; 39: 1577–83PubMedCrossRef Hanefeld M, Fischer S, Julius U, et al. Risk factors for myocardial infarction and death in newly detected NIDDM: the diabetes intervention study, 11-year follow-up. Diabetologia 1996; 39: 1577–83PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Hanefeld M, Koehler C, Schaper F, et al. Postprandial plasma glucose is an independent risk factor for increased carotid intima-media thickness in non-diabetic individuals. Atherosclerosis 1999; 144: 229–35PubMedCrossRef Hanefeld M, Koehler C, Schaper F, et al. Postprandial plasma glucose is an independent risk factor for increased carotid intima-media thickness in non-diabetic individuals. Atherosclerosis 1999; 144: 229–35PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Esposito K, Giugliano D, Nappo F, et al. Regression of carotid atherosclerosis by control of postprandial hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Circulation 2004; 110: 214–9PubMedCrossRef Esposito K, Giugliano D, Nappo F, et al. Regression of carotid atherosclerosis by control of postprandial hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Circulation 2004; 110: 214–9PubMedCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Hanefeld M, Cagatay M, Petrowitsch T, et al. Acarbose reduces the risk for myocardial infarction in type 2 diabetic patients: meta-analysis of seven long-term studies. Eur Heart J 2004; 25: 10–6PubMedCrossRef Hanefeld M, Cagatay M, Petrowitsch T, et al. Acarbose reduces the risk for myocardial infarction in type 2 diabetic patients: meta-analysis of seven long-term studies. Eur Heart J 2004; 25: 10–6PubMedCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Bastyr III EJ, Stuart CA, Brodows RG, et al. Therapy focused on lowering postprandial glucose, not fasting glucose, may be superior for lowering HbA1c. IOEZ Study Group. Diabetes Care 2000; 23: 1236–41CrossRef Bastyr III EJ, Stuart CA, Brodows RG, et al. Therapy focused on lowering postprandial glucose, not fasting glucose, may be superior for lowering HbA1c. IOEZ Study Group. Diabetes Care 2000; 23: 1236–41CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Monnier L, Lapinski H, Colette C. Contributions of fasting and postprandial plasma glucose increments to the overall diurnal hyperglycemia of type 2 diabetic patients: variations with increasing levels of HbA(1c). Diabetes Care 2003; 26: 881–5PubMedCrossRef Monnier L, Lapinski H, Colette C. Contributions of fasting and postprandial plasma glucose increments to the overall diurnal hyperglycemia of type 2 diabetic patients: variations with increasing levels of HbA(1c). Diabetes Care 2003; 26: 881–5PubMedCrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Culy CR, Jarvis B. Management of diabetes mellitus: defining the role of insulin lispro MIX75/25 (Humalog® Mix75/25). Dis Manage Health Outcomes 2001; 9: 711–30CrossRef Culy CR, Jarvis B. Management of diabetes mellitus: defining the role of insulin lispro MIX75/25 (Humalog® Mix75/25). Dis Manage Health Outcomes 2001; 9: 711–30CrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Koivisto VA, Tuominen JA, Ebeling P. Lispro Mix25 insulin as premeal therapy in type 2 diabetic patients. Diabetes Care 1999; 22: 459–62PubMedCrossRef Koivisto VA, Tuominen JA, Ebeling P. Lispro Mix25 insulin as premeal therapy in type 2 diabetic patients. Diabetes Care 1999; 22: 459–62PubMedCrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Malone JK, Woodworth JR, Arora V, et al. Improved postprandial glycemic control with Humalog® Mix75/25 after a standard test meal in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Clin Ther 2000; 22: 222–30PubMedCrossRef Malone JK, Woodworth JR, Arora V, et al. Improved postprandial glycemic control with Humalog® Mix75/25 after a standard test meal in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Clin Ther 2000; 22: 222–30PubMedCrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Malone JK, Yang H, Woodworth JR, et al. Humalog® Mix25 offers better mealtime glycemic control in patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Metab 2000; 26: 481–7PubMed Malone JK, Yang H, Woodworth JR, et al. Humalog® Mix25 offers better mealtime glycemic control in patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Metab 2000; 26: 481–7PubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Herz M, Arora V, Campaigne BN, et al. Humalog Mix25 improves 24-hour plasma glucose profiles compared with the human insulin mixture 30/70 in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. S Afr Med J 2003; 93: 219–23PubMed Herz M, Arora V, Campaigne BN, et al. Humalog Mix25 improves 24-hour plasma glucose profiles compared with the human insulin mixture 30/70 in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. S Afr Med J 2003; 93: 219–23PubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Coscelli C, Iacobellis G, Calderini C, et al. Importance of premeal injection time in insulin therapy: Humalog Mix25 is convenient for improved post-prandial glycemic control in type 2 diabetic patients with Italian dietary habits. Acta Diabetol 2003; 40: 187–92PubMedCrossRef Coscelli C, Iacobellis G, Calderini C, et al. Importance of premeal injection time in insulin therapy: Humalog Mix25 is convenient for improved post-prandial glycemic control in type 2 diabetic patients with Italian dietary habits. Acta Diabetol 2003; 40: 187–92PubMedCrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Mattoo V, Milicevic Z, Malone JK, et al. A comparison of insulin lispro Mix25 and human insulin 30/70 in the treatment of type 2 diabetes during Ramadan. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2003; 59: 137–43PubMedCrossRef Mattoo V, Milicevic Z, Malone JK, et al. A comparison of insulin lispro Mix25 and human insulin 30/70 in the treatment of type 2 diabetes during Ramadan. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2003; 59: 137–43PubMedCrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Roach P, Yue L, Arora V. Improved postprandial glycemic control during treatment with Humalog Mix25, a novel protamine-based insulin lispro formulation. Humalog Mix25 Study Group. Diabetes Care 1999; 22: 1258–61CrossRef Roach P, Yue L, Arora V. Improved postprandial glycemic control during treatment with Humalog Mix25, a novel protamine-based insulin lispro formulation. Humalog Mix25 Study Group. Diabetes Care 1999; 22: 1258–61CrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Roach P, Trautmann M, Arora V, et al. Improved postprandial blood glucose control and reduced nocturnal hypoglycemia during treatment with two novel insulin-protamine formulations, insulin lispro Mix 25. Clin Ther 1999; 21: 523–34PubMedCrossRef Roach P, Trautmann M, Arora V, et al. Improved postprandial blood glucose control and reduced nocturnal hypoglycemia during treatment with two novel insulin-protamine formulations, insulin lispro Mix 25. Clin Ther 1999; 21: 523–34PubMedCrossRef
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Malone JK, Kerr LF, Campaigne BN, et al. Combined therapy with insulin lispro Mix 75/25 plus metformin or insulin glargine plus metformin: a 16-week, randomized, open-label, crossover study in patients with type 2 diabetes beginning insulin therapy. Clin Ther 2004; 26: 2034–44PubMedCrossRef Malone JK, Kerr LF, Campaigne BN, et al. Combined therapy with insulin lispro Mix 75/25 plus metformin or insulin glargine plus metformin: a 16-week, randomized, open-label, crossover study in patients with type 2 diabetes beginning insulin therapy. Clin Ther 2004; 26: 2034–44PubMedCrossRef
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Malone JK, Bai S, Campaigne BN, et al. Twice-daily pre-mixed insulin rather than basal insulin therapy alone results in better overall glycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabet Med 2005; 22: 374–81PubMedCrossRef Malone JK, Bai S, Campaigne BN, et al. Twice-daily pre-mixed insulin rather than basal insulin therapy alone results in better overall glycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabet Med 2005; 22: 374–81PubMedCrossRef
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Roach P, Malone JK. Mean 24-hour glucose and postprandial glucose are lower with insulin lispro mixture 75/25 compared with insulin glargine in patients with type 2 diabetes [abstract]. Diabetes 2005; 54 Suppl. 1: A134 Roach P, Malone JK. Mean 24-hour glucose and postprandial glucose are lower with insulin lispro mixture 75/25 compared with insulin glargine in patients with type 2 diabetes [abstract]. Diabetes 2005; 54 Suppl. 1: A134
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Roach P, Koledova E, Metcalfe S, et al. Glycemic control with Humalog Mix25 in type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with glyburide. Clin Ther 2001; 23: 1732–44PubMedCrossRef Roach P, Koledova E, Metcalfe S, et al. Glycemic control with Humalog Mix25 in type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with glyburide. Clin Ther 2001; 23: 1732–44PubMedCrossRef
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Jacobsen LV, Sogaard B, Riis A. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of a premixed formulation of soluble and protamine-retarded insulin aspart. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 2000; 56: 399–403PubMedCrossRef Jacobsen LV, Sogaard B, Riis A. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of a premixed formulation of soluble and protamine-retarded insulin aspart. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 2000; 56: 399–403PubMedCrossRef
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Weyer C, Heise T, Heinemann L. Insulin aspart in a 30/70 premixed formulation: pharmacodynamic properties of a rapid-acting insulin analog in stable mixture. Diabetes Care 1997; 20: 1612–4PubMedCrossRef Weyer C, Heise T, Heinemann L. Insulin aspart in a 30/70 premixed formulation: pharmacodynamic properties of a rapid-acting insulin analog in stable mixture. Diabetes Care 1997; 20: 1612–4PubMedCrossRef
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Hermansen K, Colombo M, Storgaard H, et al. Improved postprandial glycemic control with biphasic insulin aspart relative to biphasic insulin lispro and biphasic human insulin in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 2002; 25: 883–8PubMedCrossRef Hermansen K, Colombo M, Storgaard H, et al. Improved postprandial glycemic control with biphasic insulin aspart relative to biphasic insulin lispro and biphasic human insulin in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 2002; 25: 883–8PubMedCrossRef
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Hermansen K, Vaaler S, Madsbad S, et al. Postprandial glycemic control with biphasic insulin aspart in patients with type 1 diabetes. Metabolism 2002; 51: 896–900PubMedCrossRef Hermansen K, Vaaler S, Madsbad S, et al. Postprandial glycemic control with biphasic insulin aspart in patients with type 1 diabetes. Metabolism 2002; 51: 896–900PubMedCrossRef
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Kapitza C, Rave K, Ostrowski K, et al. Reduced postprandial glycaemic excursion with biphasic insulin Aspart 30 injected immediately before a meal. Diabet Med 2004; 21: 500–1PubMedCrossRef Kapitza C, Rave K, Ostrowski K, et al. Reduced postprandial glycaemic excursion with biphasic insulin Aspart 30 injected immediately before a meal. Diabet Med 2004; 21: 500–1PubMedCrossRef
41.
Zurück zum Zitat McSorley PT, Bell PM, Jacobsen LV, et al. Twice-daily biphasic insulin aspart 30 versus biphasic human insulin 30: a double-blind crossover study in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Clin Ther 2002; 24: 530–9PubMedCrossRef McSorley PT, Bell PM, Jacobsen LV, et al. Twice-daily biphasic insulin aspart 30 versus biphasic human insulin 30: a double-blind crossover study in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Clin Ther 2002; 24: 530–9PubMedCrossRef
42.
Zurück zum Zitat Christiansen JS, Vaz JA, Metelko Z, et al. Twice daily biphasic insulin aspart improves postprandial glycaemic control more effectively than twice daily NPH insulin, with low risk of hypoglycaemia, in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Obes Metab 2003; 5: 446–54PubMedCrossRef Christiansen JS, Vaz JA, Metelko Z, et al. Twice daily biphasic insulin aspart improves postprandial glycaemic control more effectively than twice daily NPH insulin, with low risk of hypoglycaemia, in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Obes Metab 2003; 5: 446–54PubMedCrossRef
43.
Zurück zum Zitat Boehm BO, Home PD, Behrend C, et al. Premixed insulin aspart 30 vs. premixed human insulin 30/70 twice daily: a randomized trial in Type 1 and Type 2 diabetic patients. Diabet Med 2002; 19: 393–9 Boehm BO, Home PD, Behrend C, et al. Premixed insulin aspart 30 vs. premixed human insulin 30/70 twice daily: a randomized trial in Type 1 and Type 2 diabetic patients. Diabet Med 2002; 19: 393–9
44.
Zurück zum Zitat Boehm BO, Vaz JA, Brondsted L, et al. Long-term efficacy and safety of biphasic insulin aspart in patients with type 2 diabetes. Eur J Intern Med 2004; 15: 496–502PubMedCrossRef Boehm BO, Vaz JA, Brondsted L, et al. Long-term efficacy and safety of biphasic insulin aspart in patients with type 2 diabetes. Eur J Intern Med 2004; 15: 496–502PubMedCrossRef
45.
Zurück zum Zitat Niskanen L, Jensen LE, Rastam J, et al. Randomized, multinational, open-label, 2-period, crossover comparison of biphasic insulin aspart 30 and biphasic insulin lispro 25 and pen devices in adult patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Clin Ther 2004; 26: 531–40PubMedCrossRef Niskanen L, Jensen LE, Rastam J, et al. Randomized, multinational, open-label, 2-period, crossover comparison of biphasic insulin aspart 30 and biphasic insulin lispro 25 and pen devices in adult patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Clin Ther 2004; 26: 531–40PubMedCrossRef
46.
Zurück zum Zitat Warren ML, Conway MJ, Klaff LJ, et al. Postprandial versus preprandial dosing of biphasic insulin aspart in elderly type 2 diabetes patients. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2004; 66: 23–9PubMedCrossRef Warren ML, Conway MJ, Klaff LJ, et al. Postprandial versus preprandial dosing of biphasic insulin aspart in elderly type 2 diabetes patients. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2004; 66: 23–9PubMedCrossRef
47.
Zurück zum Zitat Raskin P, Allen E, Hollander P, et al. Initiating insulin therapy in type 2 diabetes: a comparison of biphasic and basal insulin analogs. Diabetes Care 2005; 28: 260–5PubMedCrossRef Raskin P, Allen E, Hollander P, et al. Initiating insulin therapy in type 2 diabetes: a comparison of biphasic and basal insulin analogs. Diabetes Care 2005; 28: 260–5PubMedCrossRef
48.
Zurück zum Zitat Brod M, Lammert M, Raskin P. Comparison of treatment satisfaction of twice-daily BIAsp 70/30 with once-daily insulin glargine in patients with type 2 diabetes [abstract]. Diabetes 2005; 54 Suppl. 1: A114 Brod M, Lammert M, Raskin P. Comparison of treatment satisfaction of twice-daily BIAsp 70/30 with once-daily insulin glargine in patients with type 2 diabetes [abstract]. Diabetes 2005; 54 Suppl. 1: A114
49.
Zurück zum Zitat Kilo C, Mezitis N, Jain R, et al. Starting patients with type 2 diabetes on insulin therapy using once-daily injections of biphasic insulin aspart 70/30, biphasic human insulin 70/30, or NPH insulin in combination with metformin. J Diabetes Complications 2003; 17: 307–13PubMedCrossRef Kilo C, Mezitis N, Jain R, et al. Starting patients with type 2 diabetes on insulin therapy using once-daily injections of biphasic insulin aspart 70/30, biphasic human insulin 70/30, or NPH insulin in combination with metformin. J Diabetes Complications 2003; 17: 307–13PubMedCrossRef
50.
Zurück zum Zitat Raz I, Mouritzen U, Vaz J, et al. Addition of biphasic insulin aspart 30 to rosiglitazone in type 2 diabetes mellitus that is poorly controlled with glibenclamide monotherapy. Clin Ther 2003; 25: 3109–23PubMedCrossRef Raz I, Mouritzen U, Vaz J, et al. Addition of biphasic insulin aspart 30 to rosiglitazone in type 2 diabetes mellitus that is poorly controlled with glibenclamide monotherapy. Clin Ther 2003; 25: 3109–23PubMedCrossRef
51.
Zurück zum Zitat Workgroup on Hypoglycemia American Diabetes Association. Defining and reporting hypoglycemia in diabetes: a report from the American Diabetes Association. Diabetes Care 2005; 28: 1245–9CrossRef Workgroup on Hypoglycemia American Diabetes Association. Defining and reporting hypoglycemia in diabetes: a report from the American Diabetes Association. Diabetes Care 2005; 28: 1245–9CrossRef
52.
Zurück zum Zitat Rosenstock J. Basal insulin supplementation in type 2 diabetes; refining the tactics. Am J Med 2004; 116 Suppl. 3A: 10–16SCrossRef Rosenstock J. Basal insulin supplementation in type 2 diabetes; refining the tactics. Am J Med 2004; 116 Suppl. 3A: 10–16SCrossRef
53.
54.
Zurück zum Zitat DeWitt DE, Dugdale DC. Using new insulin strategies in the outpatient treatment of diabetes: clinical applications. JAMA 2003; 289: 2265–9PubMedCrossRef DeWitt DE, Dugdale DC. Using new insulin strategies in the outpatient treatment of diabetes: clinical applications. JAMA 2003; 289: 2265–9PubMedCrossRef
55.
Zurück zum Zitat Herbst KL, Hirsch IB. Insulin strategies for primary care providers. Clin Diabetes 2002; 20: 11–7CrossRef Herbst KL, Hirsch IB. Insulin strategies for primary care providers. Clin Diabetes 2002; 20: 11–7CrossRef
56.
Zurück zum Zitat Mudaliar S, Edelman SV. Insulin therapy in type 2 diabetes. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am 2001; 30: 935–82PubMedCrossRef Mudaliar S, Edelman SV. Insulin therapy in type 2 diabetes. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am 2001; 30: 935–82PubMedCrossRef
57.
Zurück zum Zitat Korytkowski M, Bell D, Jacobsen C, et al. A multicenter, randomized, open-label, comparative, two-period crossover trial of preference, efficacy, and safety profiles of a prefilled, disposable pen and conventional vial/syringe for insulin injection in patients with type 1 or 2 diabetes mellitus. Clin Ther 2003; 25: 2836–48PubMedCrossRef Korytkowski M, Bell D, Jacobsen C, et al. A multicenter, randomized, open-label, comparative, two-period crossover trial of preference, efficacy, and safety profiles of a prefilled, disposable pen and conventional vial/syringe for insulin injection in patients with type 1 or 2 diabetes mellitus. Clin Ther 2003; 25: 2836–48PubMedCrossRef
58.
Zurück zum Zitat Kadiri A, Chraibi A, Marouan F, et al. Comparison of NovoPen 3 and syringes/vials in the acceptance of insulin therapy in NIDDM patients with secondary failure to oral hypoglycaemic agents. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 1998; 41: 15–23PubMedCrossRef Kadiri A, Chraibi A, Marouan F, et al. Comparison of NovoPen 3 and syringes/vials in the acceptance of insulin therapy in NIDDM patients with secondary failure to oral hypoglycaemic agents. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 1998; 41: 15–23PubMedCrossRef
59.
Zurück zum Zitat Coscelli C, Lostia S, Lunetta M, et al. Safety, efficacy, acceptability of a pre-filled insulin pen in diabetic patients over 60 years old. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 1995; 28: 173-7PubMedCrossRef Coscelli C, Lostia S, Lunetta M, et al. Safety, efficacy, acceptability of a pre-filled insulin pen in diabetic patients over 60 years old. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 1995; 28: 173-7PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Premixed Insulin Analogues for the Treatment of Diabetes Mellitus
verfasst von
Dr Alan J. Garber
Publikationsdatum
01.01.2006
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
Drugs / Ausgabe 1/2006
Print ISSN: 0012-6667
Elektronische ISSN: 1179-1950
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2165/00003495-200666010-00003

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2006

Drugs 1/2006 Zur Ausgabe

Adis Drug Evaluation

Anagrelide

Adis Drug Evaluation

Pioglitazone

Adis Drug Evaluation

Telmisartan