Skip to main content
Log in

Clopidogrel

A Review of its Use in the Prevention of Thrombosis

  • Adis Drug Evaluation
  • Published:
Drugs Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Abstract

Clopidogrel (Plavix®, Iscover®) selectively and irreversibly inhibits adenosine diphosphate (ADP)-induced platelet aggregation. Long-term administration of clopidogrel was associated with a modest but statistically significant advantage over aspirin in reducing adverse cardiovascular outcomes in patients with established cardiovascular disease in the CAPRIE trial. In other large well designed multicentre trials, such as CURE, COMMIT and CLARITY-TIMI 28, the addition of clopidogrel to aspirin therapy improved outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndromes. However, some issues regarding the use of clopidogrel remain unresolved, such as the optimal loading dose in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) and the optimal treatment duration following drug-eluting intracoronary stent placement.

Results of several large randomised trials, therefore, have established clopidogrel as an effective and well tolerated antiplatelet agent for the secondary prevention of ischaemic events in patients with various cardiovascular conditions, including those with ischaemic stroke or acute coronary syndromes. In addition, treatment guidelines from the US and Europe acknowledge the importance of clopidogrel in contemporary cardiovascular medicine.

Pharmacological Properties

Clopidogrel is a thienopyridine antiplatelet agent that acts by selectively and irreversibly inhibiting ADP-induced platelet aggregation mediated by the P2Y12 purinoceptor on the platelet surface. Inhibition of platelet aggregation occurs within 2 hours of administration of clopidogrel. The time to achieve maximal inhibition of platelet aggregation is significantly reduced by the use of a loading dose of clopidogrel. Platelet aggregation and bleeding times gradually return to baseline values ≈5 days after discontinuation of the drug. However, as demonstrated in ex vivo platelet aggregation studies, there can be substantial inter-individual variability in the onset and offset of the antiplatelet effect of clopidogrel.

Clopidogrel is a prodrug that must undergo biotransformation via cytochrome P450 (CYP)-mediated hepatic metabolism to an active metabolite. The active moiety is highly unstable and its pharmacokinetic properties have not been determined. Plasma concentrations of the parent compound are usually undetectable ≈2 hours after administration of clopidogrel because it is rapidly converted to the main circulating metabolite, an inactive carboxylic acid derivative, which represents ≈85% of circulating drug-related compounds in plasma. A peak plasma concentration of ≈3 mg/L for the main metabolite occurs ≈1 hour after repeated doses of clopidogrel 75 mg/day. Food does not affect bioavailability. The elimination half-life of the carboxylic acid metabolite is ≈7–8 hours.

Activation of clopidogrel occurs via CYP3A4 in humans, and ex vivo studies indicate that atorvastatin inhibits its activation; however, the clinical benefit of clopidogrel has not been shown to be reduced by concomitant administration of atorvastatin and further study appears to be warranted.

Therapeutic Efficacy

Clopidogrel has been evaluated in several large, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre clinical trials. Treatment with clopidogrel for 1–3 years in the CAPRIE study was associated with a modest but statistically significant advantage over aspirin in reducing adverse cardiovascular outcomes in patients with recent myocardial infarction (MI), recent stroke or established peripheral arterial disease. In the CURE trial, the early and long-term use of clopidogrel plus aspirin for up to 1 year was associated with a significant reduction in adverse cardiovascular outcomes (e.g. composite of death from cardiovascular causes, nonfatal MI or stroke) compared with that of aspirin alone in patients with acute coronary syndromes without ST-segment elevation. In COMMIT, patients presenting within 24 hours of onset of ST-segment elevation MI (STEMI) who were randomised to receive a short course (e.g. 4 weeks) of clopidogrel plus aspirin had significantly lower rates of death and the composite of death, MI or stroke than those who were randomised to aspirin alone. The CLARITY-TIMI 28 trial, which was conducted in patients who presented within 12 hours after the onset of STEMI and were deemed candidates for coronary angiography, showed a marked reduction in the rate of an occluded infarct-related artery (as reflected byThrombolysis in MI [TIMI] flow grade 0 or 1), recurrent MI or death among patients who were randomised to receive a short course of clopidogrel (e.g. ≤8 days, including a loading dose) in addition to standard therapy (including aspirin, a thrombolytic and, if necessary, heparin) compared with those who received standard therapy only. Essentially all patients (99.7%) in CLARITY-TIMI 28 received thrombolytic therapy, whereas thrombolytics were not mandated in COMMIT and only about half of patients received such therapy.

Prospectively planned analyses of patients who underwent PCI in CURE and CLARITY-TIMI 28 were also conducted. Results of PCI-CURE in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes showed that the use of clopidogrel plus aspirin was associated with a reduced incidence of events in the primary outcome cluster of cardiovascular death, MI or urgent target vessel revascularisation within 30 days of PCI compared with aspirin alone; longer-term cardiovascular events (mean follow-up period 8 months) were also significantly reduced with dual antiplatelet therapy. Results of PCI-CLARITY in patients with STEMI showed that randomisation to clopidogrel (in addition to standard therapy) was associated with a significant reduction in the incidence of the primary composite endpoint of cardiovascular death, recurrent MI or stroke from the time of PCI to 30 days after randomisation.

In addition to these analyses in patients undergoing PCI, the CREDO trial compared the early and long-term use of clopidogrel plus aspirin for 1 year with a shorter course of dual antiplatelet therapy (28 days starting after PCI) followed by aspirin only to the end of the study. Patients in the former group had a significantly lower incidence of events in the 1-year primary composite endpoint of death, MI or stroke than those in the latter group. There was also a numerical advantage in the 28-day composite endpoint, although this did not achieve statistical significance. CREDO is the only large prospective trial involving clopidogrel in the setting of elective PCI.

Results have been less favourable in the MATCH study in high-risk patients with recent ischaemic stroke or transient ischaemic attack and the CHARISMA trial in patients with clinically evident cardiovascular disease or multiple risk factors. In MATCH, the combined use of clopidogrel and aspirin for 18 months was associated with a nonsignificant reduction in the composite primary endpoint of ischaemic stroke, MI, vascular death or rehospitalisation for acute ischaemia compared with clopidogrel alone, but the dual antiplatelet regimen was also associated with an increased risk of life-threatening or major bleeding. After a median follow-up period of 28 months in CHARISMA, patients randomised to receive clopidogrel plus aspirin had a nonsignificant reduction in the primary composite endpoint of MI, stroke or cardiovascular death compared with those receiving aspirin only. However, there was also a nonsignificant increase in the risk of primary events and a significant increase in mortality with dual antiplatelet therapy in the subgroup of patients without documented cardiovascular disease, suggesting that clopidogrel plus aspirin should not be used for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease.

Additional data in patients undergoing PCI suggest that a loading dose of clopidogrel 600mg is required to ensure adequate antiplatelet activity if the drug is administered 2–6 hours before the procedure; a standard loading dose of 300mg is recommended when pretreatment can be administered at least 6 hours before PCI. Also, in patients receiving drug-eluting intracoronary stents, treatment with clopidogrel beyond the recommended 3- or 6-month period (for sirolimus- and paclitaxel-coated stents, respectively) appears to be warranted to reduce adverse long-term clinical outcomes, although the optimal duration of treatment is not established.

Results of a two-part phase III trial in Japanese patients with cerebral infarction (excluding cardiogenic cerebral embolism) verified the noninferiority of the efficacy of clopidogrel to that of ticlopidine in terms of preventing the primary composite endpoint of vascular events (cerebral infarction, MI and other vascular death). These results contributed to the approval of clopidogrel in Japan for use in patients with ischaemic stroke.

Tolerability

In general, the overall tolerability profile of clopidogrel, including bleeding complications, is similar to that of aspirin. In the CAPRIE trial, which directly compared clopidogrel and aspirin, significantly more patients receiving long-term clopidogrel therapy experienced rash or diarrhoea, whereas significantly more patients treated with aspirin reported gastrointestinal symptoms (indigestion, nausea or vomiting), experienced gastrointestinal haemorrhage or had abnormal liver function tests. In addition, clopidogrel was associated with a significantly higher rate of discontinuation because of diarrhoea, whereas aspirin was associated with a significantly higher rate of discontinuation because of indigestion, nausea or vomiting.

Although the risk of bleeding is generally increased when clopidogrel and aspirin are used concurrently, the benefits of dual antiplatelet therapy outweigh the risks in the management of acute coronary syndromes, particularly in patients undergoing PCI with or without intracoronary stent placement. In addition, results of CLARITY-TIMI 28 in patients with STEMI showed that clopidogrel could be administered safely in patients receiving aspirin, a thrombolytic and heparin.

Clopidogrel was shown to have a more favourable tolerability profile than ticlopidine in CLASSICS, which compared the tolerability of clopidogrel plus aspirin with that of ticlopidine plus aspirin for 28 days after intracoronary stent placement. The incidence of the combined primary outcome events (major bleeding, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia or early discontinuation) was significantly lower in the clopidogrel arm. Clopidogrel was also associated with significantly fewer adverse events (including laboratory abnormalities) than ticlopidine in the two-part phase III Japanese trial. In many countries, the use of clopidogrel has generally supplanted that of ticlopidine because of the better tolerability profile of clopidogrel (e.g. the use of ticlopidine is limited by life-threatening neutropenia).

Treatment guidelines suggest that clopidogrel be withheld for at least 5 days before coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), as it can lead to an excess in bleeding complications if administered close to the time of CABG surgery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Table I
Table II
Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Table III
Table IV

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The use of trade names is for product identification purposes only and does not imply endorsement.

References

  1. Steinhubl SR, Molitemo DJ. The role of the platelet in the pathogenesis of atherothrombosis. Am J Cardiovasc Drug 2005; 5(6): 399–408

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Wilson JM, Ferguson JJ III. Platelet-endothelial interactions in atherothrombotic disease: therapeutic implications. Clin Cardiol 1999; 22: 687–98

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. George JN. Platelets. Lancet 2000 Apr 29; 355: 1531–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Jarvis B, Simpson K. Clopidogrel: a review of its use in the prevention of atherothrombosis. Drugs 2000 Aug; 60(2): 347–77

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Easthope SE, Jarvis B. Clopidogrel: potential in the prevention of cardiovascular events in patients with acute coronary syndromes. Am J Cardiovasc Drug 2001; 1(6): 467–74

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Dickie JS, Scott LJ. Clopidogrel bisulfate: in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiovasc Drugs 2006; 6(6): 407–14

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Savi P, Heilmann E, Nurden P, et al. Clopidogrel: an antithrombotic drug acting on the ADP-dependent activation pathway of human platelets. Clin Appl Thromb Hemost 1996; 2(1): 35–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Klinkhardt U, Kirchmaier CM, Westrup D, et al. Ex vivo-in vitro interaction between aspirin, clopidogrel, and the glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors abciximab and SR121566A. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2000 Mar; 67(3): 305–13

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Caplain H, Cariou R. Long-term activity of clopidogrel: a three-month appraisal in healthy volunteers. Semin Thromb Hemost 1999; 25 Suppl. 2: 21–4

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Gawaz M, Seyfarth M, Muller I, et al. Comparison of effects of clopidogrel versus ticlopidine on platelet function in patients undergoing coronary stent placement. Am J Cardiol 2001 Feb 1; 87: 332–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Moshfegh K, Redondo M, Julmy F, et al. Antiplatelet effects of clopidogrel compared with aspirin after myocardial infarction: enhanced inhibitory effects of combination therapy. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000 Sep; 36 (699–705)

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Savi P, Labouret C, Delesque N, et al. P2Y12, a new platelet ADP receptor, target of clopidogrel. Biochm Biophys Res Commun 2001 May 4; 283(2): 379–83

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Geiger J, Brich J, Honig-Liedl P, et al. Specific impairment of human platelet P2Yac ADP receptor-mediated signaling by the antiplatelet drug clopidogrel. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 1999 Aug; 19(8): 2007–11

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Savi P, Pereillo JM, Uzabiaga MF, et al. Identification and biological activity of the active metabolite of clopidogrel. Thromb Haemost 2000 Nov; 84(5): 891–6

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Xiao Z, Théroux P. Clopidogrel inhibits platelet-leukocyte interactions and thrombin receptor agonist peptide-induced platelet activation in patients with an acute coronary syndrome. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004 Jun 2; 43(11): 1982–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Klinkhardt U, Bauersachs R, Adams J, et al. Clopidogrel but not aspirin reduces P-selectin expression and formation of platelet-leukocyte aggregates in patients with atherosclerotic vascular disease. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2003 Mar; 73: 232–41

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Quinn MJ, Bhatt DL, Zidar F, et al. Effect of clopidogrel pretreatment on inflammatory marker expression in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Am J Cardiol 2004 Mar 15; 93(6): 679–84

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Evangelista V, Manarini S, DellÉlba G, et al. Clopidogrel inhibits platelet-leukocyte adhesion and platelet-dependent leukocyte activation. Thromb Haemost 2005 Sep; 94(3): 568–77

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Azar RR, Kassab R, Zoghbi A, et al. Effects of clopidogrel on soluble CD40 ligand and on high-sensitivity C-reactive protein in patients with stable coronary artery disease. Am Heart J 2006 Feb; 151(2): 521 e1-4

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Chen YG, Xu F, Zhang Y, et al. Effect of aspirin plus clopidogrel on inflammatory markers in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome. Chin Med J (Engl) 2006 Jan 5; 119(1): 32–6

    Google Scholar 

  21. Woodward M, Lowe GDO, Francis LMA, et al. A randomized comparison of the effects of aspirin and clopidogrel on thrombotic risk factors and C-reactive protein following myocardial infarction: the CADET trial. J Thromb Haemost 2004 Nov; 2(11): 1934–40

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Vivekananthan DP, Bhatt DL, Chew DP, et al. Effect of clopidogrel pretreatment on periprocedural rise in C-reactive protein after percutaneous coronary intervention. Am J Cardiol 2004 Aug 1; 94(3): 358–60

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Cooke GE, Liu-Stratton Y, Ferketich AK, et al. Effect of platelet antigen polymorphism on platelet inhibition by aspirin, clopidogrel, or their combination. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006 Feb 7; 47(3): 541–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Plavix® (clopidogrel bisulfate tablets): US prescribing information. New York (NY): Bristol-Myers Squibb/Sanofi Pharmaceuticals Partnership, 2006

  25. Denninger MH, Necciari J, Serre-Lacroix E, et al. Clopidogrel antiplatelet activity is independent of age and presence of atherosclerosis. Semin Thromb Hemost 1999; 25 Suppl. 2: 41–5

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Savcic M, Hauert J, Bachmann F, et al. Clopidogrel loading dose regimens: kinetic profile of pharmacodynamic response in healthy subjects. Semin Thromb Hemost 1999; 25 Suppl. 2: 15–9

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Kastrati A, von Beckerath N, Joost A, et al. Loading with 600 mg clopidogrel in patients with coronary artery disease with and without chronic clopidogrel therapy. Circulation 2004 Oct 5; 110(14): 1916–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Montalescot G, Sideris G, Meuleman C, et al. A randomized comparison of high clopidogrel loading doses in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes: the ALBION (Assessment of the Best Loading Dose of Clopidogrel to Blunt Platelet Activation, Inflammation and Ongoing Necrosis) Trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006 Sep 15; 48(5): 931–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. von Beckerath N, Taubert D, Pogatsa-Murray G, et al. Absorption, metabolization, and antiplatelet effects of 300-, 600-, and 900-mg loading doses of clopidogrel: results of the ISAR-CHOICE (Intracoronary Stenting and Antithrombotic Regimen: Choose Between 3 High Oral Doses for Immediate Clopidogrel Effect) trial. Circulation 2005 Nov 8; 112(19): 2946–50

    Google Scholar 

  30. Angiolillo DJ, Fernández-Ortiz A, Bernardo E, et al. High clopidogrel loading dose during coronary stenting: effects on drug response and interindividual variability. Eur Heart J 2004 Nov; 25(21): 1903–10

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Angiolillo DJ, Fernández-Ortiz A, Bernardo E, et al. Platelet aggregation according to body mass index in patients undergoing coronary stenting: should clopidogrel loading-dose be weight adjusted? J Invasive Cardiol 2004 Apr; 16(4): 169–74

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Angiolillo DJ, Fernandez-Ortiz A, Bernardo E, et al. Is a 300 mg clopidogrel loading dose sufficient to inhibit platelet function early after coronary stenting? A platelet function profile study. J Invasive Cardiol 2004 Jun; 16(6): 325–9

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Gurbel PA, Bliden KP, Hayes KM, et al. The relation of dosing to clopidogrel responsiveness and the incidence of high post-treatment platelet aggregation in patients undergoing coronary stenting. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005 May 3; 45(9): 1392–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Price MJ, Wong GB. Variability in the recovery of platelet function after discontinuation of clopidogrel therapy [abstract no. 855-5]. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006 Feb 21; 47 (4 Suppl. A): 379

    Google Scholar 

  35. Serebruany VL, Steinhubl SR, Berger PB, et al. Variability in platelet responsiveness to clopidogrel among 544 individuals. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005 Jan 18; 45(2): 246–51

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Gurbel PA, Bliden KP, Hiatt BL, et al. Clopidogrel for coronary stenting: response variability, drug resistance, and the effect of pretreatment platelet reactivity. Circulation 2003 Jun 17; 107: 2908–13

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Gurbel PA, Tantry US. Aspirin and clopidogrel resistance: consideration and management. J Interv Cardiol 2006 Oct; 19(5): 439–48

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Matetzky S, Shenkman B, Guetta V, et al. Clopidogrel resistance is associated with increased risk of recurrent atherothrombotic events in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Circulation 2004 Jun 29; 109(25): 3171–5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Nguyen TA, Diodati JG, Pharand C. Resistance to clopidogrel: a review of the evidence. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005 Apr 19; 45(8): 1157–64

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. O’Donoghue M, Wiviott SD. Clopidogrel response variability and future therapies. Clopidogrel: does one size fit all? Circulation 2006 Nov 28; 114(22): e600–6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Wang TH, Bhatt DL, Topol EJ. Aspirin and clopidogrel resistance: an emerging clinical entity. Eur Heart J 2006 Mar; 27(6): 647–54

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Wiviott SD, Antman EM. Clopidogrel resistance: a new chapter in a fast-moving story. Circulation 2004 Jun 29; 109(25): 3064–7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Barsky AA, Arora RR. Clopidogrel resistance: myth or reality? J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Ther 2006 Mar; 11(1): 47–53

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Eikelboom JW, Hankey GJ, Thorn J, et al. Enhanced antiplatelet effect of clopidogrel in patients whose platelets are least inhibited by aspirin: a randomized crossover trial. J Thromb Haemost 2005 Dec; 3(12): 2649–55

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Plavix tablets 25 mg, 75 mg: rationale for setting the package insert (draft). Japan: Sanofi-Synthelabo Daiichi, 2006 (Data on file)

  46. Savi P, Combalbert J, Gaich C, et al. The antiaggregating activity of clopidogrel is due to a metabolic activation by the hepatic cytochrome P450-1 A. Thromb Haemost 1994 Aug; 72(2): 313–7

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Caplain H, Donat F, Gaud C, et al. Pharmacokinetics of clopidogrel. Semin Thromb Hemost 1999; 25 Suppl. 2: 25–8

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Lins R, Broekhuysen J, Necciari J, et al. Pharmacokinetic profile of 14C-labeled clopidogrel. Semin Thromb Hemost 1999; 25 Suppl. 2: 29–33

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. McEwen J, Strauch G, Perles P, et al. Clopidogrel bioavailability: absence of influence of food or antacids. Semin Thromb Hemost 1999; 25 Suppl. 2: 47–50

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Plavix tablets 25 mg, 75 mg: overview of clinical pharmacology. Japan: Sanofi-Synthelabo Daiichi, 2006 (Data on file)

  51. Deray G, Bagnis C, Brouard R, et al. Clopidogrel activities in patients with renal function impairment. Clin Drug Invest 1998 Oct; 16: 319–28

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Slugg PH, Much DR, Smith WB, et al. Cirrhosis does not affect the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of clopidogrel. J Clin Pharmacol 2000 Apr; 40(4): 396–401

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Caplain H, D’Honneur G, Carious R. Prolonged heparin administration during clopidogrel treatment in healthy subjects. Semin Thromb Hemost 1999; 25 Suppl. 2: 61–4

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Peeters PA, Crijns HJ, Tamminga WJ, et al. Clopidgrel, a novel antiplatelet agent, and digoxin: absence of pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic interaction. Semin Thromb Hemost 1999; 25 Suppl. 2: 51–4

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Caplain H, Thebault JJ, Necciari J. Clopidogrel does not affect the pharmacokinetics of theophylline. Semin Thromb Hemost 1999; 25 Suppl. 2: 65–8

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Pierce CH, Houle JM, Dickinson JP, et al. Clopidogrel and drug metabolism: absence of effect on hepatic enzymes in healthy volunteers. Semin Thromb Hemost 1999; 25 Suppl. 2: 35–9

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Lau WC, Waskell LA, Watkins PB, et al. Atorvastatin reduces the ability of clopidogrel to inhibit platelet aggregation: a new drug-drug interaction. Circulation 2003 Jan 7; 107: 32–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Shechter M. Atorvastatin and the ability of clopidogrel to inhibit platelet aggregation [letter]. Circulation 2003 Jun 10; 107(22): e210; author reply e210

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Steinhubl SR, Akers WS. Clopidogrel-statin interaction: a mountain or a mole hill? Am Heart J 2006 Aug; 152(2): 200–3

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Serebruany VL, Steinhubl SR, Hennekens CH. Are antiplatelet effects of clopidogrel inhibited by atorvastatin? A research question formulated but not yet adequately tested. Circulation 2003 Apr 1; 107(12): 1568–9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Tafreshi MJ, Zagnoni LG, Gentry EJ. Combination of clopidogrel and statins: a hypothetical interaction or therapeutic dilemma? Pharmacotherapy 2006 Mar; 26(3): 388–94

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Saw J, Steinhubl SR, Berger PB, et al. Lack of adverse clopidogrel-atorvastatin clinical interaction from secondary analysis of a randomized, placebo-controlled clopidogrel trial. Circulation 2003 Aug 26; 108(8): 921–4

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Brophy JM, Babapulle MN, Costa V, et al. A pharmacoepidemiology study of the interaction between atorvastatin and clopidogrel after percutaneous coronary intervention. Am Heart J 2006 Aug; 152(2): 263–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Mitsios JV, Papathanasiou AI, Rodis FI, et al. Atorvastatin does not affect the antiplatelet potency of clopidogrel when it is administered concomitantly for 5 weeks in patients with acute coronary syndromes. Circulation 2004 Mar 23; 109(11): 1335–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Mukherjee D, Kline-Rogers E, Fang J, et al. Lack of clopidogrel-CYP3A4 statin interaction in patients with acute coronary syndrome. Heart 2005 Jan; 91(1): 23–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. Gorchakova O, von Beckerath N, Gawaz M, et al. Antiplatelet effects of a 600 mg loading dose of clopidogrel are not attenuated in patients receiving atorvastatin or simvastatin for at least 4 weeks prior to coronary artery stenting. Eur Heart J 2004 Nov; 25(21): 1898–902

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. Wienbergen H, Gitt AK, Schiele R, et al. Comparison of clinical benefits of clopidogrel therapy in patients with acute coronary syndromes taking atorvastatin versus other statin therapies. Am J Cardiol 2003 Aug 1; 92(3): 285–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. CAPRIE Steering Committee. A randomised, blinded, trial of clopidogrel versus aspirin in patients at risk of ischaemic events (CAPRIE). Lancet 1996 Nov 16; 348: 1329–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Clopidogrel in Unstable Angina to Prevent Recurrent Events Trial Investigators. Effects of clopidogrel in addition to aspirin in patients with acute coronary syndromes without ST-segment elevation. N Engl J Med 2001 Aug 16; 345: 494–502

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. COMMIT (ClOpidogrel and Metoprolol in Myocardial Infarction Trial) collaborative group. Addition of clopidogrel to aspirin in 45 852 patients with acute myocardial infarction: randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 2005 Nov 5; 366(9497): 1607–21

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  71. Sabatine MS, Cannon CP, Gibson CM, et al. Addition of clopidogrel to aspirin and fibrinolytic therapy for myocardial infarction with ST-segment elevation. CLARITY-TIMI 28 Investigators. N Engl J Med 2005 Mar 24; 352(12): 1179–89

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  72. Steinhubl SR, Berger PB, Tift Mann J III, et al. Early and sustained dual oral antiplatelet therapy following percutaneous coronary intervention: a randomized controlled trial. CREDO Investigators. JAMA 2002 Nov 20; 288(19): 2411–20

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  73. Diener H-C, Bogousslavsky J, Brass LM, et al. Aspirin and clopidogrel compared with clopidogrel alone after recent ischaemic stroke or transient ischaemic attacks in high-risk patients (MATCH): randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. MATCH Investigators. Lancet 2004 Jul 24; 364(9431): 331–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  74. Bhatt DL, Fox KAA, Hacke W, et al. Clopidogrel and aspirin versus aspirin alone for the prevention of atherothrombotic events. CHARISMA Investigators. N Engl J Med 2006 Apr 20; 354(16): 1706–17

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  75. Sanofi-Aventis. Plavix® approved in Japan [media release]. 2006 Jan 24

  76. Mehta SR, Yusuf S, Peters RJG, et al. Effects of pretreatment with clopidogrel and aspirin followed by long-term therapy in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: the PCI-CURE study. The Clopidogrel in Unstable angina to prevent Recurrent Events trial (CURE) Investigators. Lancet 2001 Aug 18; 358: 527–33

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  77. Sabatine MS, Cannon CP, Gibson CM, et al. Effect of clopidogrel pretreatment before percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction treated with fibrinolytics: the PCI-CLARITY study. The Clopidogrel as Adjunctive Reperfusion Therapy (CLARITY)-Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) 28 Investigators. JAMA 2005 Sep 14; 294(10): 1224–32

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  78. Pershukov I, Petrakova L, Karben Z, et al. High versus standard loading dose of clopidogrel therapy in patients undergoing drug-eluting coronary stenting in European and West Asian population [abstract no. P4552]. Eur Heart J 2006 Sep; 27 Suppl.: 757

    Google Scholar 

  79. Tsuchiya Y, Lansky AJ, Mehran R, et al. Comparison between ticlopidine and clopidogrel in patients undergoing primary stenting in acute myocardial infarction. Results from the CADILLAC trial [abstract no. 868-7]. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005 Feb 1; 45 (3 Suppl. A): 87

    Google Scholar 

  80. Alexander JH, Berger PB, Hafley G, et al. Impact of early clopidogrel use on angiographic and clinical outcomes following coronary artery bypass surgery: Findings from PREVENT IV [abstract no. 932-257]. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006 Feb 21; 47 (4 Suppl. A): 178

    Google Scholar 

  81. Ringleb PA, Bhatt DL, Hirsch AT, et al. Benefit of clopidogrel over aspirin is amplified in patients with a history of ischemic events. Stroke 2004 Feb; 35(2): 528–32

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  82. Cannon CP. Effectiveness of clopidogrel versus aspirin in preventing acute myocardial infarction in patients with symptomatic atherothrombosis (CAPRIE Trial). CAPRIE Investigators. Am J Cardiol 2002 Oct 1; 90: 760–2

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  83. Bhatt DL, Marso SP, Hirsch AT, et al. Amplified benefit of clopidogrel versus aspirin in patients with diabetes mellitus. Am J Cardiol 2002 Sep 15; 90: 625–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Bhatt DL, Chew DP, Hirsch AT, et al. Superiority of clopidogrel versus aspirin in patients with prior cardiac surgery. Circulation 2001 Jan 23; 103: 363–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  85. Bhatt DL, Hirsch AT, Ringleb PA, et al. Reduction in the need for hospitalization for recurrent ischemic events and bleeding with clopidogrel instead of aspirin. Am Heart J 2000 Jul; 140: 67–73

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  86. Yusuf S, Mehta SR, Zhao F, et al. Early and late effects of clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes. Circulation 2003 Feb 25; 107: 966–72

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  87. Fox KAA, Mehta SR, Peters R, et al. Benefits and risks of the combination of clopidogrel and aspirin in patients undergoing surgical revascularization for non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome: the Clopidogrel in Unstable angina to prevent Recurrent ischemic Events (CURE) Trial. Circulation 2004 Sep 7; 110(10): 1202–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  88. Lewis BS, Mehta SR, Fox KAA, et al. Benefit of clopidogrel according to timing of percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute coronary syndromes: further results from the Clopidogrel in Unstable angina to prevent Recurrent Events (CURE) study. Am Heart J 2005 Dec; 150(6): 1177–84

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  89. COMMIT (ClOpidogrel and Metoprolol in Myocardial Infarction Trial) collaborative group. Early intravenous then oral metoprolol in 45 852 patients with acute myocardial infarction: randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 2005 Nov 5; 366(9497): 1622–32

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  90. Scirica BM, Sabatine MS, Morrow DA, et al. The role of clopidogrel in early and sustained arterial patency after fibrinolysis for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: the ECG CLARITY-TIMI 28 Study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006 Jul 4; 48(1): 37–42

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  91. Smith SC Jr, Feldman TE, Hirshfeld JW Jr, et al. ACC/AHA/SCAI 2005 guideline update for percutaneous coronary intervention: a report of the Americal College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (ACC/AHA/SCAI Writing Committee to Update 2001 Guidelines for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention). J Am Coll Cardiol 2006; 47: e1–121

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  92. Mukherjee D, Topol EJ, Moliterno DJ, et al. Extracardiac vascular disease and effectiveness of sustained clopidogrel treatment. Heart 2006 Jan; 92(1): 49–51

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  93. Saw J, Topol EJ, Steinhubl SR, et al. Comparison of long-term usefulness of clopidogrel therapy after the first percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass grafting versus that after the second or repeat intervention. Am J Cardiol 2004 Sep 1; 94(5): 623–5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  94. Amarenco P, Donnan GA. Should the MATCH results be extrapolated to all stroke patients and affect ongoing trials evaluating clopidogrel plus aspirin? Stroke 2004 Nov; 35(11): 2606–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  95. Pfeffer MA, Jarcho JA. The charisma of subgroups and the subgroups of CHARISMA. N Engl J Med 2006 Apr 20; 354(16): 1744–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  96. Patti G, Colonna G, Pasceri V, et al. Randomized trial of high loading dose of clopidogrel for reduction of periprocedural myocardial infarction in patients undergoing coronary intervention: results from the ARMYDA-2 (Antiplatelet therapy for Reduction of MYocardial Damage during Angioplasty) Study. Circulation 2005 Apr 26; 111(16): 2099–106

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  97. Wolfram RM, Torguson RL, Hassani SE, et al. Clopidogrel loading dose (300 versus 600 mg) strategies for patients with stable angina pectoris subjected to percutaneous coronary intervention. Am J Cardiol 2006 Apr 1; 97(7): 984–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  98. Kandzari DE, Berger PB, Kastrati A, et al. Influence of treatment duration with a 600-mg dose of clopidogrel before percutaneous coronary revascularization. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004 Dec 7; 44(11): 2133–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  99. Steinhubl SR, Berger PB, Brennan DM, et al. Optimal timing for the initiation of pre-treatment with 300 mg clopidogrel before percutaneous coronary intervention. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006 Mar 7; 47(5): 939–43

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  100. van der Heijden DJ, Westendorp ICD, Riezebos RK, et al. Lack of efficacy of clopidogrel pre-treatment in the prevention of myocardial damage after elective stent implantation. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004 Jul 7; 44(1): 20–4

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  101. Cuisset T, Frere C, Quilici J, et al. Benefit of a 600-mg loading dose of clopidogrel on platelet reactivity and clinical outcomes in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome undergoing coronary stenting. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006 Oct 3; 48(7): 1339–45

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  102. Chan AW, Moliterno DJ, Berger PB, et al. Triple antiplatelet therapy during percutaneous coronary intervention is associated with improved outcomes including one-year survival. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003 Oct 1; 42(7): 1188–95

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  103. Szük T, Gyöngyösi M, Homorodi N, et al. Effect of timing of clopidogrel administration on 30-day clinical outcomes: 300-mg loading dose immediately after coronary stenting versus pretreatment 6 to 24 hours before stenting in a large unselected patient cohort. Am Heart J 2007 Feb; 153(2): 289–95

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  104. Carrozza JP Jr. Duration of clopidogrel therapy with drug-eluting stents. J Interv Cardiol 2006 Oct; 19 (5 Suppl.): S40–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  105. Zimarino M, Renda G, De Caterina R. Optimal duration of antiplatelet therapy in recipients of coronary drug-eluting stents. Drugs 2005; 65(6): 725–32

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  106. Silber S, Albertsson P, Avilés FF, et al. Guidelines for percutaneous coronary interventions. The Task Force for Percutaneous Coronary Interventions of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J 2005 Apr; 26(8): 804–47

    Google Scholar 

  107. Bertrand ME, Rupprecht HJ, Urban P, et al. Double-blind study of the safety of clopidogrel with and without a loading dose in combination with aspirin compared with ticlopidine in combination with aspirin after coronary stenting: the Clopidogrel Aspirin Stent International Cooperative Study (CLASSICS). Circulation 2000 Aug 8; 102: 624–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  108. Juergens CP, Wong AM, Leung DYC, et al. A randomized comparison of clopidogrel and aspirin versus ticlopidine and aspirin after coronary stent implantation. Am Heart J 2004; 147(4): e15

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  109. Taniuchi M, Kurz HI, Lasala JM. Randomized comparison of ticlopidine and clopidogrel after intracoronary stent implantation in a broad patient population. Circulation 2001 Jul 31; 104: 539–43

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  110. Parodi G, Sciagrà R, Migliorini A, et al. A randomized trial comparing clopidogrel versus ticlopidine therapy in patients undergoing infarct artery stenting for acute myocardial infarction with abciximab as adjunctive therapy. Am Heart J 2005 Aug; 150: 220.e1-5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  111. L’Allier PL, Aronow HD, Cura FA, et al. Clopidogrel is associated with better in-hospital and 30-day outcomes than ticlopidine after coronary stenting. Can J Cardiol 2003 Aug; 19(9): 1041–6

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  112. De Luca G, Suryapranata H, van’t Hof AWJ, et al. Comparison between ticlopidine and clopidogrel in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction treated with coronary stenting. Thromb Haemost 2004 Jun; 91(6): 1084–9

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  113. Calver AL, Blows LJ, Harmer S, et al. Clopidogrel for prevention of major cardiac events after coronary stent implantation: 30-day and 6-month results in patients with smaller stents. Am Heart J 2000 Sep; 140: 483–91

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  114. Berger PB, Bell MR, Rihal CS, et al. Clopidogrel versus ticlopidine after intracoronary stent placement. J Am Coll Cardiol 1999 Dec; 34: 1891–4

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  115. Bhatt DL, Bertrand ME, Berger PB, et al. Meta-analysis of randomized and registry comparisons of ticlopidine with clopidogrel after stenting. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002 Jan 2; 39: 9–14

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  116. Chew DP, Bhatt DL, Robbins MA, et al. Effect of clopidogrel added to aspirin before percutaneous coronary intervention on the risk associated with C-reactive protein. Am J Cardiol 2001 Sep 15; 88: 672–4

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  117. Lee SW, Park SW, Hong MK, et al. Comparison of cilostazol and clopidogrel after successful coronary stenting. Am J Cardiol 2005 Apr 1; 95(7): 859–62

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  118. Chen YD, Lu YL, Jin ZN, et al. A prospective randomized antiplatelet trial of cilostazol versus clopidogrel in patients with bare metal stent. Chin Med J (Engl) 2006 Mar 5; 119(5): 360–6

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  119. Mueller C, Roskamm H, Neumann FJ, et al. A randomized comparison of clopidogrel and aspirin versus ticlopidine and aspirin after the placement of coronary artery stents. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003 Mar 19; 41: 969–73

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  120. Wolak A, Amit G, Cafri C, et al. Increased long term rates of stent thrombosis and mortality in patients given clopidogrel as compared to ticlopidine following coronary stent implantation. Int J Cardiol 2005 Sep 1; 103(3): 293–7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  121. Bernardi V, Szarfer J, Summay G, et al. Long-term versus short-term clopidogrel therapy in patients undergoing coronary stenting (from the Randomized Argentine Clopidogrel Stent [RACS] trial. Am J Cardiol 2007 Feb 1; 99(3): 349–52

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  122. Waksman R, Ajani AE, Pinnow E, et al. Twelve versus six months of clopidogrel to reduce major cardiac events in patients undergoing gamma-radiation therapy for in-stent restenosis: Washington Radiation for In-Stent restenosis Trial (WRIST) 12 versus WRIST PLUS. Circulation 2002 Aug 13; 106: 776–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  123. Bavry AA, Kumbhani DJ, Helton TJ, et al. Late thrombosis of drug-eluting stents: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Am J Med 2006 Dec; 119(12): 1056–61

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  124. Spertus JA, Kettelkamp R, Vance C, et al. Prevalence, predictors, and outcomes of premature discontinuation of thienopyridine therapy after drug-eluting stent placement: results from the PREMIER Registry. Circulation 2006; 113: 2803–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  125. Iakovou I, Schmidt T, Bonizzoni E, et al. Incidence, predictors, and outcome of thrombosis after successful implantation of drug-eluting stents. JAMA 2005; 293: 2126–30

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  126. Pfisterer M, Brunner-La Rocca HP, Buser PT, et al. Late clinical events after clopidogrel discontinuation may limit the benefit of drug-eluting stents: an observational study of drug-eluting versus bare-metal stents. BASKET-LATE Investigators. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006 Dec 19; 48(12): 2584–91

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  127. Eisenstein EL, Anstrom KJ, Kong DF, et al. Clopidogrel use and long-term clinical outcomes after drug-eluting stent implantation. JAMA. Epub 2006 Dec 5

  128. Tricoci P, Roe MT, Mulgund J, et al. Clopidogrel to treat patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes after hospital discharge. Arch Intern Med 2006 Apr 10; 166(7): 806–11

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  129. Kulik A, Le May M, Wells GA, et al. The clopidogrel after surgery for coronary artery disease (CASCADE) randomized controlled trial: clopidogrel and aspirin versus aspirin alone after coronary bypass surgery [NCT00228423]. Curr Control Trials Cardiovasc Med 2005; 6: 15

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  130. Zeymer U, Gitt AK, Jünger C, et al. Effect of clopidogrel on 1-year mortality in hospital survivors of acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction in clinical practice. Eur Heart J 2006 Nov; 27(22): 2661–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  131. Lim MJ, Spencer FA, Gore JM, et al. Impact of combined pharmacologic treatment with clopidogrel and a statin on outcomes of patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes: perspectives from a large multinational registry. Eur Heart J 2005 Jun; 26(11): 1063–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  132. ACTIVE Investigators. Clopidogrel plus aspirin versus oral anticoagulation for atrial fibrillation in the Atrial fibrillation Clopidogrel Trial with Irbesartan for prevention of Vascular Events (ACTIVE W): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2006 Jun 10; 367: 1903–12

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  133. McQuaid KR, Laine L. Systematic review and meta-analysis of adverse events of low-dose aspirin and clopidogrel in randomized controlled trials. Am J Med 2006 Aug; 119(8): 624–38

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  134. Yende S, Wunderink RG. Effect of clopidogrel on bleeding after coronary artery bypass surgery. Crit Care Med 2001 Dec; 29: 2271–5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  135. Hongo RH, Ley J, Dick SE, et al. The effect of clopidogrel in combination with aspirin when given before coronary artery bypass grafting. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002 Jul 17; 40: 231–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  136. Kapetanakis El, Medlam DA, Boyce SW, et al. Clopidogrel administration prior to coronary artery bypass grafting surgery: the cardiologist’s panacea or the surgeon’s headache. Eur Heart J 2005; 26: 576–83

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  137. Ascione R, Ghosh A, Rogers CA, et al. In-hospital patients exposed to clopidogrel before coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a word of caution. Ann Thorac Surg 2005 Apr; 79(4): 1210–6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  138. Mehta RH, Roe MT, Mulgund J, et al. Acute clopidogrel use and outcomes in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006 Jul 18; 48(2): 281–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  139. Braunwald E, Antman EM, Beasley JW, et al. ACC/AHA guideline update for the management of patients with unstable angina and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: 2002. Summary article: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on the Management of Patients With Unstable Angina). Circulation 2002 Oct 1; 106(14): 1893–900

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  140. Kapetanakis EI, Medlam DA, Petro KR, et al. Effect of clopidogrel premedication in off-pump cardiac surgery: are we forfeiting the benefits of reduced hemorrhagic sequelae? Circulation 2006 Apr 4; 113(13): 1667–74

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  141. Bennett CL, Connors JM, Carwile JM, et al. Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura associated with clopidogrel. N Engl J Med 2000 Jun 15; 342(24): 1773–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  142. Hankey GJ. Clopidogrel and thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura. Lancet 2000 Jul 22; 356(9226): 269–70

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  143. Bennett CL, Davidson CJ, Raisch DW, et al. Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura associated with ticlopidine in the setting of coronary artery stents and stroke prevention. Arch Intern Med 1999 Nov 22; 159(21): 2524–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  144. Annemans L, Lamotte M, Levy E, et al. Cost-effectiveness analysis of clopidogrel versus aspirin in patients with atherothrombosis based on the CAPRIE trial. J Drug Assess 2003; 6(3): 107–20

    Google Scholar 

  145. Karnon J, Brennan A, Pandor A, et al. Modelling the long term cost effectiveness of clopidogrel for the secondary prevention of occlusive vascular events in the UK. Curr Med Res Opin 2005 Jan; 21(1): 101–12

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  146. Schleinitz MD, Weiss JP, Owens DK. Clopidogrel versus aspirin for secondary prophylaxis of vascular events: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Am J Med 2004 Jun 15; 116(12): 797–806

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  147. Lyseng-Williamson KA, Plosker GL. Clopidogrel: a pharmacoeconomic review of its use in patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes. Pharmacoeconomics 2006; 24(7): 709–26

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  148. Lindgren P, Jönsson B, Yusuf S. Cost-effectiveness of clopidogrel in acute coronary syndromes in Sweden: a long-term model based on the CURE trial. J Intern Med 2004 May; 255(5): 562–70

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  149. Lindgren P, Stenestrand U, Malmberg K, et al. The long-term cost-effectiveness of clopidogrel plus aspirin in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention in Sweden. Clin Ther 2005 Jan; 27(1): 100–10

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  150. Mahoney EM, Mehta S, Yuan Y, et al. Long-term cost-effectiveness of early and sustained clopidogrel therapy for up to 1 year in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention after presenting with acute coronary syndromes without ST-segment elevation. Am Heart J 2006 Jan; 151(1): 219–27

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  151. Weintraub WS, Mahoney EM, Lamy A, et al. Long-term cost-effectiveness of clopidogrel given for up to one year in patients with acute coronary syndromes without ST-segment elevation. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005 Mar 15; 45(6): 838–45

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  152. Ubel PA, Hirth RA, Chernew ME, et al. What is the price of life and why doesn’t it increase at the rate of inflation? Arch Intern Med 2003; 163(14): 1637–41

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  153. Jönsson B. Changing health environment: the challenge to demonstrate cost-effectiveness of new compounds. Pharmacoeconomics 2004; 22 Suppl. 4: 5–10

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  154. Badia X, Bueno H, Gonzalez Juanatey JR, et al. Short- and long-term cost-effectiveness analysis of adding clopidogrel to standard therapy in acute coronary syndrome patients in Spain. Rev Esp Cardiol 2005 Dec; 58(12): 1385–95

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  155. Karnon J, Bakhai A, Brennan A, et al. A cost-utility analysis of clopidogrel in patients with non-ST-segment-elevation acute coronary syndromes in the UK. Int J Cardiol 2006 May 24; 109(3): 307–16

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  156. Latour-Pérez J, Navarro-Ruiz A, Ridao-López M, et al. Using clopidogrel in non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome patients: a cost-utility analysis in Spain. Value Health 2004 Jan; 7(1): 52–60

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  157. Maln C, Palmer S, Griffin S, et al. Clopidogrel used in combination with aspirin compared with aspirin alone in the treatment of non-ST-segment-elevation acute coronary syndromes: a systematic review and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess 2004 Oct; 8(40): iii–iv, xv-xvi, 1-141

    Google Scholar 

  158. Schleinitz MD, Heidenreich PA. A cost-effectiveness analysis of combination antiplatelet therapy for high-risk acute coronary syndromes: clopidogrel plus aspirin versus aspirin alone. Ann Intern Med 2005 Feb 15; 142(4): 251–9

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  159. Beinart SC, Kolm P, Veledar E, et al. Long-term cost effectiveness of early and sustained dual oral antiplatelet therapy with clopidogrel given for up to one year after percutaneous coronary intervention: results from the Clopidogrel for the Reduction of Events During Observation (CREDO) Trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005 Sep 6; 46(5): 761–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  160. Cowper PA, Udayakumar K, Sketch MH Jr, et al. Economic effects of prolonged clopidogrel therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005 Feb 1; 45(3): 369–76

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  161. Gaspoz JM, Coxson PG, Goldman PA, et al. Cost effectiveness of aspirin, clopidogrel, or both for secondary prevention of coronary heart disease. N Engl J Med 2002 Jun 6; 346: 1800–6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  162. Sarasin FP, Gaspoz JM, Bounameaux H. Cost-effectiveness of new antiplatelet regimens used as secondary prevention of stroke or transient ischemic attack. Arch Intern Med 2000 Oct 9; 160: 2773–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  163. Sacco RL, Adams R, Albers G, et al. Guidelines for prevention of stroke in patients with ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack: a statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association Council on Stroke co-sponsored by the Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention: the American Academy of Neurology affirms the value of this guideline. Circulation 2006 Mar 14; 113(10): e409–49

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  164. Fesmire FM, Decker WW, Diercks DB, et al. Clinical policy: critical issues in the evaluation and management of adult patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes. Ann Emerg Med 2006 Sep; 48(3): 270–301

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  165. Antman EM, Anbe DT, Armstrong PW, et al. ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction: executive summary. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to revise the 1999 guidelines for the management of patients with acute myocardial infarction). J Am Coll Cardiol 2004 Aug 4; 44(3): 671–719

    Google Scholar 

  166. Hirsch AT, Haskal ZJ, Hertzer NR, et al. ACC/AHA 2005 practice guidelines for the management of patients with peripheral arterial disease (lower extremity, renal, mesenteric, and abdominal aortic): executive summary. Circulation 2006; 113: 1474–547

    Article  Google Scholar 

  167. Bertrand ME, Simoons ML, Fox KA, et al. Management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation. Eur Heart J 2002 Dec; 23(23): 1809–40

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  168. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Clopidogrel and modified-release dipyridamole in the prevention of occlusive vascular events. London: National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence, 2005 May. Technology Appraisal 90

  169. Kastrati A, Mehilli J, Schuhlen H, et al. A clinical trial of abciximab in elective percutaneous coronary intervention after pretreatment with clopidogrel. N Engl J Med 2004 Jan 15; 350(3): 232–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  170. von Beckerath N, Kastrati A, Wieczorek A, et al. A double-blind, randomized study on platelet aggregation in patients treated with a daily dose of 150 or 75 mg of clopidogrel for 30 days. Eur Heart J. Epub 2007 Feb 1

  171. Bavry AA, Lincoff AM. Is clopidogrel cardiovascular medicine’s double-edged sword? Circulation 2006 Apr 4; 113(13): 1638–40

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  172. Cannon CP. What is the optimal timing of clopidogrel in acute coronary syndromes? Crit Pathways Cardiol 2005; 4(1): 46–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Greg L. Plosker.

Additional information

Various sections of the manuscript reviewed by: D.L. Bhatt, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA; C.L. Campbell, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA; J. Carlsson, Department of Internal Medicine II, Klinikum Lippe-Detmold, Detmold, Germany; C. Doecke, Royal Adelaide Hospital and University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; S. Dunn, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA; J. Latour-Pérez, Hospital General Universitario de Elche and University de Alicante, Alicante, Spain; U. Zeymer, Herzzentrum Ludwigshafen, Ludwigshafen, Germany.

Data Selection

Sources: Medical literature published in any language since 1980 on clopidogrel, identified using MEDLINE and EMBASE, supplemented by AdisBase (a proprietary database of Adis International). Additional references were identified from the reference lists of published articles. Bibliographical information, including contributory unpublished data, was also requested from the company developing the drug.

Search strategy: MEDLINE, EMBASE and AdisBase search term was ‘clopidogrel’. Searches were last updated 15 February 2007.

Selection: Studies in patients with or at risk of cardiovascular disorders who received clopidogrel. Inclusion of studies was based mainly on the methods section of the trials. When available, large, well controlled trials with appropriate statistical methodology were preferred. Relevant pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic data are also included.

Index terms: Clopidogrel, antiplatelet, acute coronary syndromes, atherothrombosis, percutaneous coronary intervention, myocardial infarction, stroke, pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics, therapeutic use.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Plosker, G.L., Lyseng-Williamson, K.A. Clopidogrel. Drugs 67, 613–646 (2007). https://doi.org/10.2165/00003495-200767040-00013

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00003495-200767040-00013

Keywords

Navigation