Skip to main content
Erschienen in: PharmacoEconomics 11/2001

01.11.2001 | Original Research Article

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis and the Consistency of Decision Making

Evidence from Pharmaceutical Reimbursement in Australia (1991 to 1996)

verfasst von: Dr Bethan George, Anthony Harris, Andrew Mitchell

Erschienen in: PharmacoEconomics | Ausgabe 11/2001

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Objective: The principle aim of this study was to generate a league table of drugs considered by the Australian Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee (PBAC) for reimbursement. The table was used to test the hypothesis that decisions made by the PBAC are consistent with the maxim of economic efficiency. In addition, we explored whether the past decisions by the PBAC revealed a threshold incremental cost-effectiveness ratio beyond which the PBAC is not prepared to recommend reimbursement of a drug.
Methods: All 355 submissions made to the PBAC between January 1991 and June 1996 were reviewed. Submissions using cost per life-year gained (26 submissions) or the cost per quality adjusted life-year (QALY) gained (9 submissions) were ranked in a league table and compared with advice given by the PBAC about that drug. The confidentiality restrictions for the submissions require that the individual drug details cannot be revealed in this article.
Results: There was a statistically significant difference between the cost per life-year gained for drugs that were recommended for listing and those that were not, suggesting that the PBAC has been broadly consistent with the use of economic efficiency as a criterion for decision making. We did not find an explicit threshold beyond which the PBAC was unwilling to pay for additional life years gained. However, between 1992 and 1996 the PBAC appears to have been unlikely to recommend a drug for listing if the additional cost per life-year exceeded 76 000 Australian dollars [$AU] (1998/1999 values) and was unlikely to reject a drug for which the additional cost per life-year gained was less than $AU42 000. The cost-effectiveness ratio was not the only factor determining the reimbursement decision.
Conclusions: The results of this preliminary study indicate that decisions to recommend a drug for listing by the PBAC in the last few years have, by and large, been consistent with the notion of economic efficiency.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Hall J. Research into action: does economic evaluation affect health policy or practice? In: Harris A, editor. Proceedings of the 17th Australian Conference of Health Economists, 1995 Jul. Australian Studies in Health Services Administration no. 80. Sydney: School of Health Services Management, University of New South Wales, 1995 Hall J. Research into action: does economic evaluation affect health policy or practice? In: Harris A, editor. Proceedings of the 17th Australian Conference of Health Economists, 1995 Jul. Australian Studies in Health Services Administration no. 80. Sydney: School of Health Services Management, University of New South Wales, 1995
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Canadian Coordinating Office of Health Technology Assessment (CCOHTA). Guidelines for Economic Evaluation of Pharmaceuticals. 1st ed. Canada, Ottawa: CCOHTA, 1994 Canadian Coordinating Office of Health Technology Assessment (CCOHTA). Guidelines for Economic Evaluation of Pharmaceuticals. 1st ed. Canada, Ottawa: CCOHTA, 1994
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Pharmaceutical Management Agency (PHARMAC). The first 20 months. Wellington: PHARMAC, 1995 Pharmaceutical Management Agency (PHARMAC). The first 20 months. Wellington: PHARMAC, 1995
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Department of Health. Memorandum of Understanding on Appraisal of Health Interventions. London: Department of Health, 1999 Department of Health. Memorandum of Understanding on Appraisal of Health Interventions. London: Department of Health, 1999
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Department of Health. Faster access to modern treatment: how NICE appraisal will work. A discussion paper. London: Department of Health, 1999 Department of Health. Faster access to modern treatment: how NICE appraisal will work. A discussion paper. London: Department of Health, 1999
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Hay J. Pharmaecoeconomic guidelines: where do we go from here? Value Health 2001; 4: 211–50PubMedCrossRef Hay J. Pharmaecoeconomic guidelines: where do we go from here? Value Health 2001; 4: 211–50PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Richardson J. Cost-utility analysis: what should be measured? Soc Sci Med 1994; 39(1): 7–21PubMedCrossRef Richardson J. Cost-utility analysis: what should be measured? Soc Sci Med 1994; 39(1): 7–21PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Ryan M. Using willingness to pay to assess the benefits of assisted reproductive techniques. Health Econ 1996; 5(6): 543–8PubMedCrossRef Ryan M. Using willingness to pay to assess the benefits of assisted reproductive techniques. Health Econ 1996; 5(6): 543–8PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Johannesson M, Johansson PO, Kristrom B, et al. Willingness to pay for antihypertensive therapy: further results. J Health Econ 1993; 12(1): 95–108PubMedCrossRef Johannesson M, Johansson PO, Kristrom B, et al. Willingness to pay for antihypertensive therapy: further results. J Health Econ 1993; 12(1): 95–108PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Reid W. Willingness to pay for diagnostic services: a new approach to modelling patient benefits in health care. Health Econ 1994; 3: 55–266 Reid W. Willingness to pay for diagnostic services: a new approach to modelling patient benefits in health care. Health Econ 1994; 3: 55–266
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Johannesson M. Theory and methods of economic evaluation of health care. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1996 Johannesson M. Theory and methods of economic evaluation of health care. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1996
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Gold MR, Seigel JE, Russell LB, et al., editors. Cost-effectiveness in health and medicine. New York (NY): Oxford University Press, 1996 Gold MR, Seigel JE, Russell LB, et al., editors. Cost-effectiveness in health and medicine. New York (NY): Oxford University Press, 1996
13.
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Maynard A. Developing the health care market. Economic J 1991; 101: 1277–86CrossRef Maynard A. Developing the health care market. Economic J 1991; 101: 1277–86CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Australian Institute of Health. Cervical cancer screening in Australia: options for change. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service, 1991 Australian Institute of Health. Cervical cancer screening in Australia: options for change. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service, 1991
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Tengs TO, Wallace A. One thousand health-related quality-of-life estimates. Med Care 2000; 38(6): 583–637PubMedCrossRef Tengs TO, Wallace A. One thousand health-related quality-of-life estimates. Med Care 2000; 38(6): 583–637PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Weinstein M. From cost-effectiveness ratios to resource allocation: where to draw the line? In: Sloan FA, editor. Valuing health care: costs, benefits, and effectiveness of pharmaceuticals and other medical technologies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995: 77–97CrossRef Weinstein M. From cost-effectiveness ratios to resource allocation: where to draw the line? In: Sloan FA, editor. Valuing health care: costs, benefits, and effectiveness of pharmaceuticals and other medical technologies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995: 77–97CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Mason J. Cost per QALY league tables: their role in pharmacoeconomic analysis. Pharmacoeconomics 1994; 5(6): 472–81PubMedCrossRef Mason J. Cost per QALY league tables: their role in pharmacoeconomic analysis. Pharmacoeconomics 1994; 5(6): 472–81PubMedCrossRef
19.
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Drummond M, Torrance G, Mason J. Cost-effectiveness league tables:more harmthan good. Soc Sci Med 1993; 37(1): 33–40PubMedCrossRef Drummond M, Torrance G, Mason J. Cost-effectiveness league tables:more harmthan good. Soc Sci Med 1993; 37(1): 33–40PubMedCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Commonwealth Government of Australia. Guidelines for the pharmaceutical industry on the preparation of submissions to the Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee. Canberra: Department of Health and Family Services, 1995 Commonwealth Government of Australia. Guidelines for the pharmaceutical industry on the preparation of submissions to the Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee. Canberra: Department of Health and Family Services, 1995
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Commonwealth Government of Australia. National Health Act. 1953 Commonwealth Government of Australia. National Health Act. 1953
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Commonwealth Government of Australia. Amendment to the National Health Act 1953 Subsection 3(a). 1987 Commonwealth Government of Australia. Amendment to the National Health Act 1953 Subsection 3(a). 1987
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Australian Bureau of Statistics. Australian economic indicators. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service, 1999 Australian Bureau of Statistics. Australian economic indicators. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service, 1999
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Hill S, Mitchell A, Henry D. Problems with the interpretation of pharmacoeconomic analyses: a review of submissions to the Australian Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme. JAMA 2000; 283(16): 2116–21PubMedCrossRef Hill S, Mitchell A, Henry D. Problems with the interpretation of pharmacoeconomic analyses: a review of submissions to the Australian Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme. JAMA 2000; 283(16): 2116–21PubMedCrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Hadourn DC. Setting health care priorities in Oregon: cost-effectiveness meets the rule of rescue. JAMA 1991; 265(17): 2219–25 Hadourn DC. Setting health care priorities in Oregon: cost-effectiveness meets the rule of rescue. JAMA 1991; 265(17): 2219–25
Metadaten
Titel
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis and the Consistency of Decision Making
Evidence from Pharmaceutical Reimbursement in Australia (1991 to 1996)
verfasst von
Dr Bethan George
Anthony Harris
Andrew Mitchell
Publikationsdatum
01.11.2001
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
PharmacoEconomics / Ausgabe 11/2001
Print ISSN: 1170-7690
Elektronische ISSN: 1179-2027
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2165/00019053-200119110-00004

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 11/2001

PharmacoEconomics 11/2001 Zur Ausgabe

Adis Pharmacoeconomic Drug Evaluation

Piperacillin/Tazobactam

Adis Pharmacoeconomic Drug Evaluation

Paclitaxel